TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Paraplegic_Dolphin Archive

View 1 post and 175 comments by Paraplegic_Dolphin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Question for MenParaplegic_Dolphin/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Chatting with cool women from the other side of the planet doesn't exactly lead to dates. And volunteering isn't exactly as good for dating as people seem to think. I volunteer with a few animal shelters and a wildlife rescue group, and all the women involved that are over 18 are either married or LTR'd. There are also female variants of the things you listed. So the populations of dateable women drops at a theoretically similar rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:44 PM
1

Obviously the number is dramatized for effect. But in every group, the number of men vastly overshadows the number of women. Rarely do single women show up, and when they do there's a line of men trying to get with them. Unless of course she's so ugly she's borderline deformed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:30 PM
2

I know, I know. But the competition just gets tiresome after a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:22 PM
2

RP only applies to heterosexual relationships. If a gaybro wants to use RP on another gaybro, good luck to him. But I'd say it remains an untested (and mostly unimportant to RPers) spinoff theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 07:33 PM
1

Was having horrible luck with women, went looking for help Couldn't find anything that I hadn't already done and failed with, kept looking Going deeper and deeper into the PUA realm, started getting better results Found RP, results increased exponentially.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 07:26 PM
14

I wouldn't say I've sworn them off altogether. I'm open to the possibility. But the likelihood of finding a women I'd be willing to settle down with is slim to none.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 04:08 AM
2

If a man has the power/resources to pull off the male dual-mating strategy, more power too him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 11:49 PM
2

That's what drugs are for right? Seeing how much you can drink before you pass out in the stall at a club and wake up with a stranger. Or see how much ecstasy you can take before you can't find a refill station and die of a heat stroke at the festival.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 11:47 PM
11

Everybody likes to believe they have the answers, and that they'll be the one to finally share some new piece of information that changes your life. Of course they're new around here, and they don't realize that they're just rehashing the same mindless drivel and useless platitudes FA's/incels have heard at least 100 times. They're also people who have had it easy from the start. Good genes, solid family and childhood, and of course a large and diverse friend group going back to their youth. So …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 10:27 PM
1

You're trying so hard to weasel around the facts sitting directly in front of you. Countless studies show women consider a mans career and income to be of utmost importance. The VAST majority of relationships have the male in the higher earning position. Women consistently CHOOSE lower paying careers, men consistently CHOOSE higher paying careers. The facts are clear, the evidence is a few keyboard clicks away. Why do you (and so many BP's) fight it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 01:42 PM
6

She's not my style, but let's be honest here. She's at least an 8. Nowhere near average, I don't care what country you're in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 03:34 AM
1

Eh, it's a vagina, I'd probably hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:57 AM
2

I'd say so, at least here in the south.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:53 AM
3

Something like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 01:00 AM
2

But their not marrying randomly. Every study done shows income being a huge factor for women when considering a partner. There's a very clear pattern. Not seeing it is simply willful ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:46 AM
2

That's exactly it. While men become doctors, women become nurses. While men become lawyers, women become receptionists. While men become engineers, women become accountants. Your example being an software engineer, where there are very few women, is not an isolated incident.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:44 AM
2

The wage gap is largely self-inflicted with the millennials. Even so, women in power still marry above themselves. A woman making $20K/yr won't marry a guy making less than $30K/yr, and a woman making $100K/yr won't marry a man making less than $150K/yr. NOTE Obviously these numbers a made up to make a point, not hard set rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/16 10:10 PM
11

She's got no problem bouncing to a new dude as soon she gets a little bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 10:35 AM
19

She's a flight risk. You're just number 41, and 42 will be along soon enough. TRPers don't want to get caught in that wake.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:18 PM
2

I wasn't talking about the adult baby. I forgot my painfully dry humor needs a /s in text.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:12 PM
2

If she's the most mature teenager in the room anyway, there isn't much difference as far as I'm concerned. Maybe a pacifier might stop the monotonous droning for a little while at least...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:02 PM
2

I handle my own homemaking, I don't want children, and I don't need financial or emotional support. Sex on tap is cool, but not worth the effort. Especially if she's in settle down mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:56 PM
6

What else would she offer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:44 PM
4

This is just another example of the Kafkatrap that is modern day leftism. No matter how valid your reason for disliking it, you're a misogynistic, racist, xenophobic, transphobic shitlord for disliking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 06:10 PM
19

First, the narrowing income gap doesn't matter. Women still, by and large, date and marry above themselves. A man still needs to make more than her, have a higher degree of education, and a higher career trajectory than her to be considered a long term prospect. Second, no matter how you word or define the situation, the end result is the same. A man getting a raw deal from a women who already had her fun and now wants to settle with a guy who can pay the bills. If you're cool with that, go for …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 06:07 PM
1

Facts will, the difficulty is proving those facts. I don't take people at their word, and all you have is words.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 06:01 PM
1

Video logs for the duration of your relationship, which obviously can't be provided. But without it, anything you say is just going to be you casting a good light on yourself over the internet, and anything you quote from him is just what he would say knowing you're going to hear it. This is the reason I disregard self-reported surveys and any 'data' derived from them. People can't be trusted to give accurate, truthful answers, even when the survey is anonymous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 10:37 PM
3

I've seen women with >= Master's Degrees cheat on their wealthy, well-educated fiancés with the physique competitors and male strippers I hang out with. Until the ladies of PPD can prove they've been married for 30+ years without straying and without the sex life dying, I'll continue to take their word for what it is, text on a monitor (and probably half-truths at best).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:38 PM
2

Occam's Razor. You're needlessly adding variables to this solution. You can't ever know how a guy was acting over a forum post. So your really just trying to give any made-up excuse you can as to why women aren't just being shallow, and why everything is still always men's fault. Gotta maintain that 'women are wonderful' mentality at all costs though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 10:52 AM
15

Yes. Single mothers train their sons to be as little like the father who left as possible. Ignoring that those things she's training out of her son, are the very things that attract young women. You see it time and time again where these boys raised by single moms are great guys, fantastic husband material on paper. Single mothers in their 30's dream of finding a guy as together, kind, gentle, and nurturing as him. Unfortunately he's probably going to spend his teens and 20's alone, unless he ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 09:40 PM
19

FA types band together because everyone shits on them outside of their group. Everywhere they go, everything they do, is met with contempt and vitriol. You even acknowledge this in your post. You have a long drawn out explanation of how people can very easily become ostracized by society, sometimes even through no fault of their own. You clearly understand how, and why it happens. Yet you consistently shit on them. Even in the very post where you pretend to be sympathetic (as if we don't already…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 03:12 PM
4

The last woman I dated was super interested, borderline obsessive about architecture. She was also really good at sculpting. It was really cute, she would not just take pictures of every building and art piece we went to see, but she would get closeup shots of the grout work holding together stonework. I swear she got wet for Ottoman architecture and fine marble work. Fucking weirdo...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 09:49 PM
1

Here's me explaining it to someone else a while back. An idea does not have a moral value. Only after an idea has been put into action does it have a moral value. Otherwise you're talking about thought-crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 01:34 AM
5

If all you do is bitch and moan about something without providing an alternative, you're just a whiny little bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:42 AM
1

It happens in every group. Whether she be a redneck, a fitness chick, a gamer-girl, a goth chick, or a liberal college chick; women just prefer more muscular men. Given an option between a skinny/fat guy, and a jacked dude, she's gonna pick the jacked dude (all else being equal). This isn't that difficult of a concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:32 AM
2

I am, and I'm a dude, but I'm also a nerd who hangs out with geeky groups. I've seen girls leave their nerdy boyfriends to hang all over one of my lifting bros I got into MTG or 40K. That's why I never take the, "it's who you surround yourself with" argument seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 07:48 PM
0

Never. Given a choice of two men, all else being equal, she'll go with the more jacked one. I think this is another one of those little lies people tell to make themselves and everyone around more comfortable. When a guy says he's not really into huge tits, is he really gonna turn down a chick with huge tits coming onto him? Doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 06:00 PM
-1

That's not their job. Feminists are about entitlement, not improvement. Their requests/demands are all about changing laws so that governments/corporations/schools/men do things for them, not for them to do things for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:13 PM
1

That's a well known fact. You know, 'The Gatekeepers of Sex', Briffault's Law. Dudes put on a show, and the chicks choose the ones they want. The active side is still the male.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 12:36 AM
5

Why does she care more about a ring and a party than the family and life they could build together?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 09:27 PM
1

I can't be bothered. TL;DR?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 09:25 PM
2

And that's all a lot of us want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 09:23 PM
1

That's funny. In the thread on PPD, and everywhere else I've ever heard this debate; men and women almost universally disagree on how to define 'an approach'. Ah well, as with most things, the bar must be lowered to allow women the feeling of success. For the sake of debate though, I'll accept your/this definition. How is this still not passive? So she throws a smile from across the bar, then everything else still falls on him. He still has to go start the conversation, manufacture chemistry, es…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 09:19 PM
1

Where is this research? And what do they consider 'moves'? I know a scary number of women who genuinely believe playing with their hair on the other side of the bar counts as an approach. Hell, we had a thread here on PPD not long ago where most of the women here seemed to believe that. If that's how low the bar is for women to make 'moves', it should be more of an embarrassment than anything else. Especially if that low of a bar can still only be reached 50% of the time. Get it the fuck togethe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 02:37 AM
3

You're extrapolating this idea too far for this discussion. When RP says passivity is easy, they're specifically talking about passivity in terms of dating. The vast majority of women take the passive role in every aspect of dating. From waiting for men to make the first move every step of the way before dating, and still relying on him to make all the choices while dating. Everything from the first kiss, to the first bone, to 'where the fuck are we eating dinner on our 7th anniversary' all fall…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 01:19 AM
0

Other than lifting, I don't really apply anything else, and I do that because it became a hobby. I picked up on the PUA/TRP stuff and went wild with it. Got laid a decent bit, and now I'm bored of it. I'd really rather just play video games now. Approaching women, putting in 1000 hours a week to advance your career, and putting on a facade of confidence and dominance is tiring, and Dark Souls with beer is just a lot more fun. Maybe one day I'll get lonely and want to try again, or maybe I'll hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/16 03:25 PM
1

Does she weigh less than me? Is she at least passably interested in me? I can make it work...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 08:27 PM
1

I still don't think two people choosing to be together negates their value, and revalues them equally. Does that mean Donald and Melania Trump are equal SMV? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 08:18 PM
2

I complain about my car too. You gotta take what you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 08:08 PM
7

The majority of people also see relationships as they grow up. You probably saw your mom and dad (or step parents) together. You learned how they acted, reacted, and adapted to changing situations. Combine that subconscious information gain with the useless platitudes, and you "just get it." I grew up isolated with a single mother who never dated again after having me. I never saw a relationship from the inside, and by the time I hit my late teens and started hanging out with people I only got t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 12:58 PM
2

SMV is subjective in the sense that some people attach more/less value to different things. Look at the relationships around you. Which one looks better? Which one makes more money? Which one has a higher degree of education? Which one has a better career placement? Which one has a better career trajectory? Which one has a higher social value? More friends, more involved family, better community around them? These are the things that effect someones SMV. Some less valuable than others, and some …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 12:46 PM
2

I guess I just don't pay much attention to the points of complaint you have with TRP. I don't care about objective studies in the context of dating, because I don't trust self-reported data, ever. I've also seen plenty of success stories and even failure stories, what is it that you think is being blocked? And as in real life, politics are as avoidable as you want them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:24 PM
1

Not always, no. You see it on /r/okcupid all the time, some shy-guy makes an unfinished account and 3 days later receives an unsolicited message from his future wife. That's part of why I still think dating is 90% luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:17 PM
1

True, but I still think the bar is lower for women than it is for men. If a women is capable of maintaining a conversation on the occasion that a man tries to start one, she'll probably do alright eventually. But that scenario rarely plays out for men. A shy women may still be approached at some point, a shy man HAS TO get the fuck over it and make an approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:12 PM
4

I hate using 'safe space' to describe a forum. The internet is too accessible and too easily manipulated to just allow anything to go. And that will obviously lead to moderation within any group. If that becomes your definition of a safe space, than literally every forum on the internet, about any topic at all, is a safe space to protect those trying to have any given conversation. More to your point though; TRP is a brand of dating/life advice. They talk about their strategies, their errors, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:42 AM
2

God damn it... Edited. But that's great for you dude, you've got the looks to pull of the 'cute shy guy' and I'd be lying if I said I wasn't jealous. But for us busted looking dudes, we gotta try another approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 08:48 PM
4

Aren't you a woman? That makes this all null. Being shy and awkward are traits considered cute in women by many many men. Not so much the other way around. Unless a guy is incredibly attractive or charismatic (which means he's not shy or awkward) women aren't going to go out of their way to strike up conversations. While those bitter, venom spitting men do exist; I think they're far from the majority. I think most are like I was. Shy and awkward, and didn't know how to start a conversation. But …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 08:25 PM
8

Having been FA in the past, I empathize with them a great deal. Having met FA women since getting out of FA status myself, I now see that obviously women can be lonely, but I think what men in these forums (myself in the past included) are getting at (while lacking nuance), is that it takes much more for a women to become FA than a man. A man who's even a little shy, or awkward, or god forbid has any level of social anxiety has a really good chance of being essentially exiled from greater societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 06:19 PM
5

Good for you. Damn near 100% of women say they don't mind men being virgins in their 20's. The experience of many 20-something virgin men proves otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 02:31 PM
10

Yeah. Admitting to being a virgin at 18 is embarrassing, and you will get clowned for it. Admitting you're a virgin after 21 is social suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 01:34 AM
3

Feminism in 2016 is a lot of man-hate, and a lot of Kafka Traps. Someone saying they're not a feminist to me means they don't agree with feminism TODAY. I think feminism accomplished a lot, and a lot of what it accomplished was great. I have not interest in returning to an era before 2010. But when you hear about feminism TODAY, you don't hear about them campaigning in Uganda to stop female genital mutilation, you hear about how some tacky t-shirt is keeping girls out of STEM and how sexist air …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 09:59 PM
5

Like I said, TRP is the knowledge of bomb making. Knowledge itself has no moral leaning. Just like learning to build and engine, you can learn to build a bomb. But you can put that engine in a truck and mow down civilians, just like you can use that bomb to kill people. Only after use, does knowledge gain a moral leaning, not before. And claiming otherwise is inching you closer to the camp of thought policing book-burners.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:08 PM
10

A strategy is not moral or immoral. Me knowing how to make a bomb isn't moral or immoral. Me teaching someone else how to make a bomb isn't moral or immoral. If I were to make a bomb with the intention to kill bad guys, then that action becomes moral. If I were to make a bomb with the intention to kill innocents, then that action becomes immoral. What TRP is, is the knowledge of bomb making, and the spreading of that knowledge. Discussion is too low of a level, the knowledge hasn't been used, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:43 PM
6

But how? HOW do you "go for it?" HOW do you "actually ask women out?" HOW do you "make a move?" I've yet to find anywhere outside of the PUA and TRP realms where these questions are answered. For a man who doesn't know HOW to do these things, this advice is still just as horseshit as "just be yourself." Try asking a women how she hooked up with that last guy she hooked up with, or how her and her SO got together. I'll bet my fucking savings account her answer is something along the lines of "It …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:37 PM
24

The reason women's advice is shit is because it leaves a massive void where they simply don't know what the fuck to do. According to women, all you have to do is dress well, be nice and next thing you know, you're happily married with kids. Advice women will give you: dress 'better', groom 'better', find interesting hobbies. And when you do all this with no better dating results, it's because... Advice women won't give you: Be assertive, hell be aggressive. Push boundaries, and make bold moves. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 01:26 AM
2

So would you prefer to date a guy who just couldn't give a shit about where you are, who your with, or what your doing? Also, see my reply to BiggerDthanYou.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:10 PM
2

Of course, and that's why I call it a spectrum. From completely controlling behavior all the way to true IDGAF behavior, there are men who fill all roles. My point is that I think most women prefer a level of mate-guarding more toward the controlling side than a completely laissez-faire mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:09 PM
3

Yes. I've heard many women talk about how much they like when their boyfriend mate-guards, in whatever form it takes. Some women like a man who will stand up for them at any time, others seem to like a man who's "an asshole, just not to me." Or on the other end of the spectrum, I've heard quite a few women talk about breaking up with ex's because 'He was just nice to everyone, I didn't feel like he was treating me special, or fighting for me.' Either way, the outcome is the same; women love thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:59 PM
1

Of course, this is why men seeking female dommes is one of the most popular requests (from men) in any kink community. The number of men who want to be submissive in a relationship/sexually far outweigh the number of women willing to be dominant in those situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 09:35 PM
4

I thought we were above this SJW drivel here at PPD? Tell me more about your Sapiosexual Gender-fluid Attack Helicopter identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 02:06 AM
1

They can have different probabilities of cheating all they want. That doesn't make it any less black and white. If they cheat, they chose to out of a complete lack of respect for their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 01:55 AM
1

Cheating is never an accident. There's a long chain of events that lead to any sexual situation. A women going out and cheating on her boyfriend is a calculated action. She had many chances to stop the situation, and chose to participate anyway. And before someone asks, the same goes for cheating men. Anybody who cheats on a partner clearly has zero respect for them. And there is no justification. If you find yourself needing to have sex with someone else during an exclusive relationship, it's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 04:42 PM
2

Like I said in my first post, if you're happy being lonely and celibate, go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:38 PM
1

And what happens when you have your degree, and a great job, and a house on your own, and interesting hobbies, and you've done everything right, but still can't make friends or get any attention from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:13 AM
4

You win, *Some TBP readers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:10 AM
1

And that's the choice you made. Some people want something else. There are those who are naturals with game, and therefore don't understand how anybody could have difficulties making friends or picking up women. Luckily advice exists for those who aren't naturals. Those who are over-eager or too apathetic and drive people away from them, they need to learn to do what others do naturally. That's game.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:05 PM
2

Depends on the party. Going over to a friends house where the larger friend group is meeting up, and going to by home by midnight? Fine, I don't have a problem with that. Putting on the fluorescent thong and pasties to go to a rave with a group of dudes all on E? I won't stop her, but we won't be together anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:38 PM
2

How do you get to that point? Not by asking them to hangout every day, and not by not contacting them for weeks at a time. The same way you don't message a girl immediately after a date telling her how much fun you had and how you can't wait to see her again, you can't bug the shit out of people you just met because you want to be really good friends with them. The game will always be played.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:35 PM
5

You're taking the ramblings of one man to represent the ideology of all who read TRP. That's not how it works, this isn't a religion, Archwinger is not a holy man, and that post is not scripture. Anyone with any shred of rationality reads TRP, takes what they need, and moves on. Those that stay are too far gone to concern yourself with, let them burn themselves out. Human emotions can only last for so long, and hatred is one of the quickest to dissipate. TBP spends so much time laser focused on …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:20 PM
1

As I told RoidLovinMassMonster, making friends is still game.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:09 PM
1

Friend game. Don't bug the shit out of them and drive them away, but make sure to keep in contact enough so they stay interested in hanging out with you. Whether it's game to pick up chicks or friends, it's still game. The game will be played, whether you want to or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:08 PM
1

As a man, the cost of not learning game is perpetual loneliness. If you're OK spending your life alone and celibate, that's fine. But if you want something more, anything more, you're going to have to learn game.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 09:18 PM
2

TRP is full of dudes that have taken the time to analyze the world around them and when faced with the facts, take on a borderline nihilistic attitude towards it. TBP is full of people that have experienced mostly good things, have bought into the just world fallacy, and can't understand how others would disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 01:55 AM
2

You're right, but the way you word it makes it seem like I have high standards. My standards, and expectations are abysmally low. I'm just not interested in the benefits of an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 01:50 AM
3

Literally every single one of my female friends has used the 5 or the 10 point scale at some point. Maybe jokingly, but they use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:04 PM
1

Hot enough to LTR a younger, more starry eyed Paraplegic_Dolphin? Like 80% Hot enough to LTR the lightly older, jaded and cynical Paraplegic_Dolphin? 0% I'm far more interested in the benefits of casual sex and short term dating than the benefits of an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:57 PM
3

Good enough for just one night? Like 95% Good enough for marriage? 0%
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 12:04 AM
1

Read my first post again, I didn't say T was the 'one and only predictor of libido.' I said it was the 'single greatest booster of sex drive.' Not meaning it's the only thing that will boost someones sex drive, but it is the most effective/direct, natural, single means to do so. Sure MDMA will boost your sex drive, so will coke and Viagra, and many other synthetic or combinations of other natural substances. But as far as I know, no singular substance found naturally found in the human body will…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 02:56 PM
2

No, you're the only one that gives a shit about you. Do what you have to do to stay happy with your own existence, because nobody else will. And if somebody gets hurt along the way, well they'll learn to stay the fuck out of the way next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:21 PM
1

Alright, now I understand what your saying. I'm not a women and certainly haven't been pregnant, so I can't talk about the drive of those hormone combos under those conditions. But nonetheless, this is still a different argument than what we started with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:19 PM
1

Again, we were talking about averages. You're talking about a situation where your hormones were not at a normal state, therefore you were no longer average. Comparing you in that state to your husband in a normal (average) state is not a fair comparison. You needed a boost (natural or not) to get your libido up to that level. That's no longer a comparison of averages.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 09:57 PM
1

No, I get exactly what your saying. Under extreme circumstances, during a portion of your pregnancy, while your hormones were out of control, you had a higher libido than A SPECIFIC MAN, your husband. Does he normally have a high libido, or just higher than yours? Is yours normally low? Or are we now comparing a high-T women to a low-T man? Let's test this, you get pregnant again and throw your hormones off, and I'll take steroids and test boosters to throw my hormones off and then lets talk abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 01:23 AM
1

Are hormones influenced by culture, or is how the people react to the effects of those hormones influenced by culture? Until we have hard evidence to the contrary, I'll believe the science.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 10:21 PM
1

It happened right in this thread... I should have put an >inb4 in my first comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 10:20 PM
1

The estrogen and progesterone boosts I had during my pregnancies would blow the average male libido out of the water. - TheScienceOfLight Just hours before... But inevitably some twat comes along with a story of how she had a higher libido than one of her ex's, which clearly negates all we know about biology and hormones. - Paraplegic_Dolphin Like clockwork...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 10:17 PM
3

What eserai said. Anecdotes from Roman orgies don't counter modern biological studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 02:24 AM
3

How does this help your case? Are you trying to say that women are saving all their pent up arousal for these 3 dudes? Again, untestable and undebatable. It's widely accepted by everyone except the most ardent feminists that men are more aroused, more often than women (barring any bizarre cases of low-T men with high-T women).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 02:22 AM
1

So your arguing that women can get just as aroused as a man during a single sexual encounter? So like, peak arousal achieved during a relationship? While I still doubt the average women could even compare to the average man as far as any sex drive matter is concerned, it's untestable the thereby undebatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:30 AM
1

IDK if there's any evopsych behind it, but I went a little more in depth in response to DrunkGirl HERE.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:22 AM
3

IDK if it's implied sluttiness, I think that's just how people rationalize the way men act when approached. I've never heard from men IRL that a women who approaches is slutty. What I have heard is that something must be wrong with the situation. Whether she just got herpes and is now angrily trying to spread it to any man she can, or if her boyfriend is in the alley and she's setting you up to get mugged, or if it's just a prank one of your other friends put her up to, something ain't right. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:19 AM
8

I'm too lazy to look up studies. But you're scientifically incorrect. Testosterone is a hell of a drug, and is the single greatest booster of sex drive. Biologically, the average man will have a sex drive leagues above the average women. But inevitably some twat comes along with a story of how she had a higher libido than one of her ex's, which clearly negates all we know about biology and hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:07 AM
2

You know, I never thought about it this way. But this does kind of feel like an Uncanny Valley type thing. Women and men can sense when something is off, obviously not with 100% accuracy. Maybe this explains why so many dudes get creeped out by forward women. Maybe that's the male 'creep-sense' and it just comes out as slut-shaming. Intriguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 09:47 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 05:37 AM
3

Looks are all that matters. Good looking shitheads will still go far in the dating game, while ugly dudes with a heart of gold will still get nothing out it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 08:56 PM
5

No, marriage is stupid. Legally tying yourself to another human is close to the dumbest thing you could do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 08:54 PM
1

I said it once before on this sub, but luck is the biggest issue. Dating is 90% Luck, 9% Looks, and 1% everything else. You can look great and have a heart of gold, but if you have shit luck, you're just as fucked as a morbidly obese autist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:15 PM
7

In the US? Obviously women. We live in an era where women are allowed to do whatever they want, and someone will always be there to catch them when they fuck up. Outside the US? I don't know, and I couldn't pretend to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:09 PM
2

And the lesson of this drivel is: If you want success, be Trump. If you want women to tell you how swell you are and how some women someday is going to love you, but never really accomplish anything, be Burnie. And not a soul was surprised...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:07 PM
4

Obviously, douchebag jocks and scummy artists are very different people, but both still fill the Chad role. And at the end of the day, your last paragraph is exactly what dudes don't want. It sucks to be the dude, who can only get laid by 30+ year old women who are done having fun and want to settle into a comfortable life of monthly missionary sex and romantic comedies every night. If faking being an alpha-douchebag means I get to dodge that fate, I'll make that choice every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 05:41 PM
2

It's a joke, I forgot the /s.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 05:29 PM
2

Hey girl, what you doin tonight?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 01:52 PM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 01:46 PM
1

Both?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 01:46 PM
1

Here we go again. "I did this thing, and it worked perfectly for me! If you would just do the same it'll work out great for you too! And if it doesn't, you're clearly just doing it wrong."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 02:41 AM
8

I'll be honest, if my standards were any lower I could date a corpse. But us having a common interest and her being able to hold a conversation would definitely put her at the top of the list. But, that's just asking way too fucking much.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 02:38 AM
2

True, that's the trap. They tell you do open up, and when you do they say you're too needy and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:56 AM
3

You know all that blathering women do at random times about absolutely nothing of relevance, aka 'venting?' That. They have feeling 24/7, why not you? Here's Mark Gungor explaining it in a comedy show
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:28 AM
4

It means striking some arbitrary emotional balance this particular woman wants. Open up and tell her your feelings, not too little because then you're cold and distant, but not too much because then you're clingy cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:12 AM
1

True, and that's why we have an impasse at PPD; we have different experiences, and demanding others believe your side when their life experiences are the polar opposite is ridiculous. And you can't subjectively interpret these stats, that's the problem. There's too many unanswered questions. It's just like when RPers claim the past was superior because marriage rates were higher and divorce was lower, but were they happy marriages? Now divorce rates are down and marriage rates are lower than eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:05 AM
2

True, even barring homosexuals/asexuals/whatthefuckever there will be a subset of both genders that nobody will ever find attractive. The debate around here is just which group is larger and more hopeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 12:40 AM
1

With age comes baggage. Whether from failed relationships or failing to get relationships, people get jaded and bitter as they age.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:45 PM
1

At what age? And after how many years of agonizing loneliness? And how many of those relationships are actually happy, loving, fulfilling relationships? Or how many are just together because they can't pull anything else, be it they don't have the skills or are past their prime? Raw statistics involving relationships just don't answer enough questions for me to take seriously. And asking these questions counts as a self-reported survey, which I don't trust for shit. So, I'll leave this one to my…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:40 PM
3

I actually used to agree with this. But now I've met some FA type women, and they don't seem any less soul-crushingly lonely than FA men do. There are fewer of them for sure, but I don't think the few there are are any less lonely than the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:32 PM
3

By that same logic, there would be men that would never be attractive to any women ever. This is all based on the almighty luck factor non-RPers rely so heavily on. "If you just be yourself and get out there, you'll meet someone perfect for you eventually." How many years should someone waste using this strategy with no success before trying something else? Anytime someone gives this advice I think in my head it means 'keep bashing your head against the wall, eventually you'll break through or d…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 04:10 PM
2

Yes, it reinforces it. That's the whole "enjoy the decline" mentality. You know those kids who spent all their time working on school work, engaging in academic activities after school, and not partying and having a good time? All those people I know are now lonely fucks with a nice degree to hang on their wall that nobody will look at...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 04:03 PM
3

Yes, no always means no. Even if it doesn't, treat it as if it does. Then when she texts you after a few days of no contact asking what happened you can be all snobby and passive aggressive and say shit like "Well, you said you didn't want to."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 01:53 AM
3

Probably has something to do with how many more distractions we have today, both forced and optional. School was nowhere near as important 40 years ago as it is today. Kids who choose to waste their youth in school will obviously come out behind others in the social department. 20 years ago, video games (and other solo hobbies) weren't nearly as prevalent or accessible as they are today, and people choosing to spend their time doing those things will end up behind others as well. Mix these with …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 01:39 AM
25

So what if it is? Dating someone much more experienced than you can be intimidating. It comes with all kinds of discomfort. Hearing her talk about crazy shit she did with exes can be heartbreaking, and visiting her home town only to be surrounded by men that have already fucked her can be gut wrenching. If you have option, why not take the least uncomfortable one? Why are you so concerned with other dudes not wanting to date sluts? Why the fuck did I come back to this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 02:08 AM
1

No No No Yes, because I couldn't pretend to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 01:56 AM
3

From an individual man's perspective, positive. From an individual women's perspective, don't know don't care. From societies perspective, null. So few men will ever take part in these subcultures that it doesn't make a bit of difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/15 03:31 AM
1

I, like most RPs I would assume; have an inherent distrust of women. Especially ones who are that aggressive. You can't game someone who distrusts you before you even start. I'd probably just stop talking to her, and I'd only feel as though my suspicions were confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/15 03:28 AM
29

Because they got lucky. They said the right thing, to the right person, at the right time, and everything worked out great. So they assume if everyone does the same thing it'll work out for them as well. The fact is there are great and horrible people that to great in the dating game, just like there are great and horrible people who can't seem to get anywhere. But for them to acknowledge this would mean they accept that their success is mostly dumb luck, and nobody wants to do that. So they mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 07:42 PM
1

I remember watching a video once that was basically a talk show, and I think the lady running it was a doctor or a psychologist or something (can't find the video now). One of the lady viewers asked almost exactly this question. Her explanation was that women want emotional security from their man, but also an emotionally vulnerable man. And the problem she described is that when women pry a man for emotional exposure, she's forcing him to expose his emotional weaknesses. This in turns breaks do…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 10:01 PM
2

That's my point, it's neither an approach, nor a rejection. If you want to go by a textbook definition of approach, then I guess it works. But we all know there's more to an 'approach' in terms of dating. Here is where the warps ideas come in. Girl 'approaches' boy, and starts random conversation. Boy doesn't pick up on the interest, perpetuate the conversation, start escalating, and do the mating dance. Girl runs away to Reddit and exclaims "See! We get rejected too! And it hurts just as bad!"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 09:24 PM
1

If I approach a women and start talking about beers, have the conversation fizzle out when she says shes not a beer drinker, then I walk away, does that count an an approach an a rejection?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 10:33 AM
1

I guess I should have included something to indicate levels. Yes, I think an outrageously paid doctor can pull it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 10:31 AM
5

No, only for unbelievable levels of status and power. Only presidents, congressmen, stars, and athletes can pull that off. This is something I don't agree with TRP on, looks are above and beyond your number 1 asset, man or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:16 AM
1

I'm a pretty moderate RP, so it'll be pretty hard to disprove the few RP things I agree with. But I'll change them if I see overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:09 AM
1

Obviously not. What you find when you pry information out of people who actually believe that is that they have a warped idea of what an 'approach' is. Some women actually believe that the smile from across the bar counts as an approach. Spend any amount of time reading AskWomen and you'll see they have no concept of what an approach actually is. Even the ones who claim to have approached their boyfriend, if you really dig into the story you'll find all she did was start a conversation and let h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:01 AM
0

I'm RP, and I still don't understand why you'd use dread. If you're unhappy, leave. No explanation, communication, or passive aggression required. There's 3+ billion women on this planet, on to the next one. As for married men that can't just leave, you chose, poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:50 AM
1

Bear Mode But that's because I'm a powerlifter turned strongman. Fuck physique, eat more lift more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 10:25 PM
2

A couple in their 40's start dating, they're boyfriend/girlfriend. Do you still not consider it cheating if one goes outside the relationship for sex (assuming they didn't agree to an open relationship)? Do your thing is saying that I don't care what you do, I just don't understand it, and "bruh" is a bastardization of "bro". Also, I'm not BP, I'm quite red. I just respect monogamy at any stage of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 02:59 AM
5

I consider a bf/gf relationship to have unspoken vows and there are consequences. It's the promise of monogamy, and the consequence for breaking it is a split. Of course, if you don't care about the consequences then do your thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 02:41 AM
4

Ignoring the age thing, cheating is A-Okay until marriage for you? Do your thing bruh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 02:38 AM
10

jacks, pls
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 12:05 AM
4

Surprise! There's nothing you can do! It's all a numbers and waiting game. Ask as many girls out as you can, and see if anything sticks. Some guys get lucky enough to find their wife at 16, other are virgins till death (at least you're not those guys). Happy dating games, and may the odds be ever in your favor! In the mean time, if a relationship isn't an even exchange, kill that relationship. Forget anybody who only knows your name except for when they need something.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 11:50 PM
1

No amount of after school activities will repair the shattered psyche created by growing up thinking your parents are just too busy to care about you. I grew up with a single mom who left before I woke up for school and didn't get back until hours after I had. It's shitty, and I'd like to warn people about not tearing apart their kids life because you'd rather build a career or are "unhaaaaapy" with your choice of partner. EDIT: Abandoned Child Syndrome It doesn't take much to ruin someones life…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 10:38 PM
7

You can do whatever you want to do. You can accomplish whatever you want to accomplish. But there are pros and cons to everything, and all your choices have consequences. Now go forth and take over the world little one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 11:57 PM
8

DISCLAIMER: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS AHEAD The happiest, most productive families I know have a father at work and a mother at home (potentially reversed? haven't seen it). The most fucked up families I know have split parents, with one rarely being seen and the main custodial parent at work while the kids are at daycare or being raised by video games. There's your spectrum, now where does this relationship fall in that spectrum? With both parents at work, what are the kids doing? What shape is the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 10:48 PM
7

It's feel good advice that translates into, "stop asking me why you're so lonely, creep."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/14 01:30 AM
1

I'd love to say Man B, but in real life, Man A is the one that leaves with the girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/14 10:36 PM
1

Those are examples of beta traits, which TRP says are required for a long-term relationship AFTER you've began dating. The issues is that being friendly and helpful doesn't attract women. She knows he's friendly and helpful, so she'll ask him to help her move or paint her living room, maybe even hang out. But under no circumstances will she ever date him, because being a friendly, helpful father/husband figure isn't sexy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/14 10:06 PM
3

The original idea behind women being incapable of love is that women are incapable of loving a man the way he expects to be loved, that was the original quote anyway. And it's mostly true, men and women love differently. From this RP men are supposed to understand that women will never love you the way you want to be loved, and you're supposed to just accept that and move on. But I guess this is an example of context being lost even within TRP. As for the alpha-fuck/beta-bucks system, it happens…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/14 04:53 PM
12

Every time I read someone say something along the lines of "not unique to TRP" or "should be common sense" I get a little frustrated. Yes, very few things, if any, are unique to TRP. But they are compiled and organized there in a way nobody else (I've found) does. Everywhere else you go has incomplete/out of context advice ("be yourself", "be confident", "be funny"). All with no context and is absolutely useless for someone who doesn't already understand how to do those things. Then you find TRP…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/14 02:02 PM
2

Always, never end the hug, ever!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/14 12:29 AM
5

Go to school Party Go to work ??? Profit (hopefully live to see 40) I guess that goes for both genders...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/14 08:47 PM
1

I agree with you, but that doesn't change how people act. IDK if you've seen the reports from Tindr and OkCupid (the book Dataclysm I think), but those show online dating being much more cutthroat than IRL dating. When people are presented with seemingly endless access to "perfect" people, why waste time with normal people?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 05:32 PM
0

If you're a normal human being who is capable of filtering garbage from reality, it has no influence. If your not, you're gonna have a bad time. As far as online dating sites go, the numbers have shown if you don't have an amazing profile with amazing pictures and a carefully planned/interesting profile, you're not getting anywhere. Take a trip of r/okcupid and see people's stories of fixing their profiles after a critique and instantly get their first message in 2 years. lel
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 01:49 PM
1

All of them... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGzq2HQ2YRs
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 01:40 AM
6

crippling social anxiety and an inability to communicate with women led me to the red pill. 10/10 would pop pills again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:24 AM
1

Whatever pills I can get, and any music. Except Country, fuck country.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 09:39 PM
1

bruh 2deep4me
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 09:08 PM
4

Surviving long enough to find something interesting to do...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 01:10 AM
1

But claiming 0.18% as a majority vote is a fair way to judge a subreddit? Just for giggles lets assume only 1000 people even read the sub, that's still only 14%.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 09:31 PM
3

If you're not good with comebacks I'd say just giggle and brush it off. Just don't let it shake your frame, and being able to laugh at yourself shows others you won't be shaken. Also, try and work on your witty comeback game. Can't tell you how, other than to watch how other people do it, and watch a lot of stand up comedy.
/r/askTRP27/09/14 10:48 PM
2

140 upvotes / 74,788 subscibers (as of posting) Is 0.18% a majority vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 08:35 PM
4

Probably not, and it's a bit disheartening. But as they say, hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 11:32 AM
2

Most of your examples deal in absolutes, there are always exceptions to the rules. Also, your batch of male perks seem to come from the lunatic fringes of the RP community. Only clowns believe they'll be able to pull a gorgeous women 20+ years younger than them, or that game actually makes up for unattractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 01:16 AM
1

RP is probably A LOT more to blame than non-RP in this scenario. They do go above and beyond with the "biotruths" sometimes. But still neither side is right or wrong, they both just make blanket statements for simplicities sake. It's hard to talk about people on a granular level in a forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 12:53 AM
7

I think whatever makes a couple happy is all that matters. But as far as the debate goes, I think it comes from RPers and non-RPers refusing to believe the other side actually exists. Some RPers seem to believe that a couple can't be happy with neutral or reversed gender roles, and some non-RPers seem to believe that nobody could ever be happy in traditional gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 12:35 AM
3

are you implying all women "shit test"? Yes. I think women call them Fitness or Loyalty Tests, and don't look at them in the same light as men, but they are the same. so once you stop trying to "train them", then what? If you think she's worth dealing with the shit test, then you deal with them. Otherwise, you leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/14 06:22 PM
2

The dog metaphor is a bit disingenuous, but it gets the point across. Eventually you get tired of women shit testing you, and it's no longer worth trying to get them to stop (training them).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/14 06:09 PM
4

Only use self-deprecating jokes if you're escalating someone else' joke about you. Never clown yourself for no reason, but don't let someone else make the best joke about you either.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 02:02 AM
1

We mainly talk about wildly erratic behavior, and not so much diagnosed mental illness (but I'm new and haven't read everything, so I may have missed a lot of it). And while most women are capable of it, some have the ability to control it. The difference lies in knowing if she's a lunatic or not. If you choose to mess with someone that shows crazy behavior before you get involved, you should expect to end up in jail at some point, and it's your own fault, for "sticking your dick in crazy." I'd …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 10:00 PM
3

I think the problem is that people have different ideas of what they consider harassment. So even documenting cases of it won't make people care. I've seen people's "harassing tweets" and this ladies cyber-stalker, and I still don't care. Having grown up on the internet and playing games, I'm used to being called a "faggot-nigger" and being threatened with ass-rape on the regular. I've had people find out who I was IRL and threaten me with that info. It doesn't faze me, so whenever I see anybody…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 11:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter