TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pardonme23 Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by Pardonme23 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The law says nothing about "provoking". I victim can never provoke a beating. If he was angry, why not slap the wall of the elevator instead?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:27 AM
1

He admitted guilt. Why are you adamant to defend him? What has he done earn your respect?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:52 PM
1

He was found guilty of assault. The legal system supports nothing you say.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:16 AM
0

Conservative politics
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:00 AM
1

If Ray Rice was in no immediate danger or bodily harm, why was force enough to knock her out needed? If he was angry, there was nothing stopping him slapping the wall to let out his anger.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:50 AM
0

Yes. Believe it or not, in the adult world, you are responsible for your own actions. Strange concept, but its true. Nothing in the law has a contingency for "being provoked". He was not in danger of great bodily harm therefore knocking her unconscious was excessive force. If someone is being mean to you, there is nothing stopping you from walking away. Same with Ray Ruce. If the legal action includes knocking a woman unconscious, then (surprise surprise) Ray Rice is fully responsible. Legally, …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:44 AM
1

Legally speaking, a victim NEVER provokes their beating. You clearly know nothing about the law.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:34 AM
-2

Maybe you grew up in a shitty neighborhood
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:24 AM
1

I actually have a degree in human biology, for what its worth. What you say is partially true. Most of the time its true. Its gray, not black and white. I know men and women are different. It doesn't really bother me either. This subreddit though does bother me because its full of shit, but that is another discussion. Problem is we i don't really have any sources to back up what i want to say, and neither do you. Both us need to do research on this, aka peer-reviewed scientific articles and stud…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:05 AM
1

I never said it bothers me. Its just that engineering is way too skewed towards men. As in its a cockfest sometimes. It irks me but who am I to force people down certain career paths?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:27 AM
1

elaborate then.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:43 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:23 PM
2

I say denounce them. Stand up for what's right even if you're a minority of 1.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:01 PM
0

I think what OP is saying that talking to radical feminists isn't going to anything. The change comes from the moderate feminists. MLK never talked to the KKK to end racism. Instead, he appealed to moderate whites (LBJ being the most important). MLK also never painted white people with a broad brush, and in fact marched with them side by side.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:13 AM
2

I think its that SNL isn't funny. Seth Myers is TERRIBLE. they both did weekend update together.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:59 AM
0

Dying earlier has been happening for a while now. Hundreds of years. Learn to use evidence, not opinions out of your ass. Your opinions are (surprise surprise) wrong. Show me evidence to back up what you say.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:21 AM
1

Calling her ugly does nothing to help your argument
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:11 AM
0

Two wrongs don't make a right
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:59 AM
-5

most counties it's majority men doing the murdering. What's the point of this post? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:49 AM
1

I don't see the connection of showing that women commit crimes helping mens' rights. Women are half the population. It just fuels the raging douchebags who like to generalize women as inferior and think feminists as out to get them. There are a lot of dumbasses on this subreddit who think in black and white and don't know nuance.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:45 AM
-2

Its not a bs stat. Its been studied in peer-reviewed journals over and over again. Uncircumcised penises have an extra moist membrane where bacteria and viruses like to hang out. During sex this helps pass on disease. Circumcised penises do not have this, hence the lower STD rates. Basic common sense. Surely you knew this, right?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:35 AM
-5

Why were women engineers a higher percentage in Soviet Russia than in the USA during the same time period?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:09 AM
-3

Nope. Its psychology. Media and societal expectations effect the way people think and what they value. In soviet russia, even though it was a shithole, women and men were all seen as servantsbto the state and more equal than they are here. That led to about equal numbers of male and female engineers over there back then. Not so in the USA ever. In the USA, for example, women are seen as nurtures a lot, so about 70% of teachers are women. Obviously less then 50% of engineers in america are women.…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:42 AM
1

How is cherrypicking bad things women do helping mens' rights? The Catholic Church has done far worse sexual abuse and cover-ups than this btw. There have been plenty of rape cases and coverups with a man raping a woman as well. Does that mean all men are pigs and rapists? Does that help women who are being discriminated against achieve equal rights? What's the point if this post?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:31 AM
-3

Male circumcisions are medically beneficial. 40% less chance of catching STDs, including HIV. Its not an issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:21 AM
8

The women are more likely to be touching the dead because they are caretakers. That helps explain why. Also, who the fuck cares about what some random person on fb says?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:09 AM
-5

Experts disagree with you
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:56 AM
5

She'll still be a horrible parent no matter the gender
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:45 AM
-1

I'm not excited. Don't put words in my mouth. Its a rather cruel practice that makes sex painful, can lead to death by bleeding, and is used to make girls "pure" in islamic states of northern africa. Male circumcision and FGM are different. They are separate discussions.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:32 AM
-1

Male and female are different. Don't relate the two. The female one is bad. The male one is good, because it has a 40% less chance of transmitting HIV. therefore it saves lives. Your fake moral crusade should focus on reducing transmission of HIV and other diseases. Circumcision is one way to do it, combined with condoms. When people want to conceive they don't use condoms, which is why corcumcisions are important. Also when people have casual sex with no condoms, whichn happens. Pro-life people…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:20 AM
1

You must be from India http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2734047/India-s-rape-shame-continues-Men-held-sex-attack-schoolgirls-hanging-tree-NOT-charged-police-say-not-evidence.html
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:09 AM
-2

You're using an extremely biased nonscientific source. Stop it. I can do that too to argue that something that's false is true. This is why peer-reviewed scientific studies are used to study and discuss science, not opinion blogs from a biased source. The point of having controls and variables is to limit cause and effect to one variable. Simply saying "europeans have it less!" literally ignores hundreds of factors that have nothing to do with circumcision that help explain that. Talk about thos…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:28 AM
-2

Different topic. Don't put words in my mouth. This is about foreskin. FGM is very very different than male circumcision. Don'r try and realte or group the two. My answer is no.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:13 AM
-2

Dear lord you're dumb. Show me a peer-reviewed scientific study that states that circumcision doesn't reduce HIV transmission. Did it occur to you that you ignored about 100 other factors. The first thing you learn in statistics class is correlation does not imply causation. I got my numbers from peer-reviewed studies. You pulled your opinion out of your ass. Learn basic science you raging idiot. An uncircumcised penis is an extra moist membrane that bacteria and viruses like to congregate, whic…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:54 PM
-3

Opinion blogs are not scientific studies. Your source says that the studies need to be redone. That is not the same as circumcisions don't work. Also, your source admits circumcision is medically effective. As for the "risk compensation" factor, your source guesses on what might happen. This study actually looks at that and shows its not true. Here is another study about male circumcision for preventing HIV/AIDS in Africa. More evidence saying that male African circumcision is effective and the …
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:09 AM
1

Young males commit crimes a lot. Testosterone plus naivety do that. Nobody forces you to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:37 AM
0

This sub is run by idiots. You're young a naive so be wary. Notice the lack of differing opinions.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:27 AM
-4

Pro-life feminists hate using condoms because they falsely think condoms lead to a culture of sexual promiscuity. Same with Rick Perry and the HPV vaccine. All for an idiotic illogical moral crusade. The net results of their actions are more abortions and STDs and more girls with uterine cancer than there would be if these groups did nothing. You guys try to prevent circumcision for some idiotic moral crusade. Since circumcisions mean a 40% less chance of getting STDs including HIV, the net resu…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:02 AM
-8

40% less chance of contracting HIV. it saves lives. Learn basic science.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:51 AM
-1

Show me where a Jew murdered a gentile and got away with it based on the quote you provided
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:50 AM
-5

40% less chance of STDs. You're stupid not do it.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:49 AM
-3

You're letting your bias overtake your logic. Be cognizant of your confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:48 AM
2

This has nothing to do with men or women. If you're trying to screw people out of their money, you would try to do it to as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:45 AM
1

You pulled that 50% number out of your ass. Women are bring screwed over too.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:44 AM
-9

Look up the stats on men and rape
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:41 AM
-9

Most rapes are done by men, and most rapists don't go to jail.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:40 AM
1

Wil?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:34 AM
1

Do you believe in affirmative action? As in purposefully giving advantages to discriminated groups to help undo systematic discrimination that has built up in society over time?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:54 AM
1

I did not know about the NOG issue. What about the fact that guys waste more time playing video games and jerking it than girls? In the USA everyone has the opportunity to succeed, no?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:12 AM
1

Maybe its merit based?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:57 AM
1

But its better if mom is there in the bathroom with the demo is what I'm saying. Also, I'm just a Curb fan
/r/MensRights01/09/13 09:16 PM
1

Just off the top of my head http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bilaSB_tAE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:48 PM
2

Generally a husband wife raising the kids offers the kid a maternal and paternal role model, which is good for them. Each has different skills they can teach their kid. For biological, if you go into evolutionary biology, both parents are invested in their kid so they can pass down their genes. Plus the oxytocin makes the mother and father infatuated with their newborn.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:58 PM
1

Why is this story in this subreddit?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:53 PM
2

Laws are only potent if they are enforced.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:52 PM
3

It is. If done well it works.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter