~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | We need to talk more about Left Wing politics and less about feminismI believe so | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/07/26 06:36 AM |
| 7 | We need to talk more about Left Wing politics and less about feminismThat’s not anything dissenters don’t already know though, they’re just being disingenuous and subversive in a that contributes to why there are few pro male left spaces. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/07/26 03:14 PM |
| 19 | We need to talk more about Left Wing politics and less about feminismThis is truly the only thing that needs to be said about these concern troll posts It’s a male advocacy space from a left wing perspective, why would we be having discussions about left wing politics that don’t include male advocacy. It’s also completely impossible to talk about male advocacy without talking about feminism because it is the dominant gender philosophy that directly gets used against the interests of male advocacy- what part about that is difficult to understand? I can’t view post… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/07/26 03:09 PM |
| 13 | Portrayals of Misfit Men in Movies and How That Reflects/Influences Perceptions IRLAs much as I admire GDT’s craft and think the movie itself was impressive on many levels, I hated his interpretation of Frankenstein and this was part of why. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/06/26 12:55 AM |
| 1 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?Yeah that thread maps on cleanly to what you’re describing so I understand you fully, I think the only disagreement between us might maybe be a category error (?). Like I read through the whole thing including your reply and I see the logic train and it does make sense assuming all of the implicit assumptions are unchallenged, but I would err on the side of challenging those assumptions because I think there is a LOT of backwards rationalising in pop psychology- rather than a framework for under… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/06/26 12:19 AM |
| 1 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?I said platonic sex for lack of better word to mean the antithesis to your previous last sentence: “the only solution is to actually teach men how women want to be loved, which means that men must be emotional about their sexualities” I think traditional romantic sex is mixing your loving emotions with the sexual desire you have for the other person, so platonic here means the purely lustful desire without that emotional component. Just can’t think of a better shorthand for it at the moment “It'… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/06/26 03:54 AM |
| 3 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?No I didn’t think you were feminist, my questions were genuine and I was just sharing my own thoughts as well- like to your first paragraph here I was not really disagreeing, just explaining why I wasn’t considering the perspective of it being used in art analysis. I agree that it’s not an antonym. I articulated myself incorrectly if that’s what you thought I was saying, I was just laying out a framework for why I think the term is less well defined compared to male gaze- which is that the inten… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/06/26 03:40 AM |
| 3 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?I understand your perspective but imo at least from an American perspective, I don’t see any meaningful difference between the conservative and feminist perspective on male disposability- seems to me that women regardless of political affiliation assigned male value to productivity, and would give you an endless list of reasons about patriarchy and other sociopolitical institutions for why it is that way and ought to stay that way I think men similarly can make similar claims about wanting women… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/06/26 03:01 AM |
| 5 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?No? Not sure how that’s what you took away from my reply I was saying that I disagree with “women are being admired only for their appearance and for nothing else meaningful” being assumed to be valid, when I don’t think feminists and women broadly would ever say men making equivalent claims about being objectified for productivity is similarly valid | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/06/26 09:50 PM |
| 2 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?Thank you for the thoughtful reply “Usually the terms "male gaze" and "female gaze" are used in context to mean what a piece of art focuses on. It's not just men or women looking, it's what they'd prefer to be looking at.” I could imagine that being the intended use, but it’s gotten so assumed by common gender discourse that I would say the colloquial use tends to be exactly just about what men and women prefer to look at. I’d include the usage in a lot pop culture articles with that as well, bu… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/06/26 09:46 PM |
| 11 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?Is that even really valid when there is no logical consistency applied to the underlying premises, and it only ever matters in this specific heteronormative context? You can describe similar dynamics between various relationships and people will contest the validity using reasons that apply the same as counter arguments here. I question accepting that as valid | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/06/26 06:58 PM |
| 3 | [Repost] Why does ‘male gaze’ have ‘male’ in it?You keep saying they’re different, but your examples are not speaking to much. Can you define the differences in greater detail? I don’t see the point behind focusing on the arms thing exclusively and not the more pornographic images women consume given that this term is always used towards men liking pornographic imagery themselves, but even with the hands/arms thing, there is no difference. Plenty of men admire female hands in the same, plenty male art about women highlights parts of their bod… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/06/26 06:15 PM |
| 4 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.I can see you are not interested in being good faith, so I will respond and end the convo here. Liberalism wasn’t created by industrialists or factory owners. Its roots are in Enlightenment thought and predate industrial capitalism, with ideas about individual rights, constitutional government, religious liberty, and limits on state power already being developed long before the modern factory system. The American founders were themselves heavily influenced by liberal political philosophy, so des… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 05:48 AM |
| 4 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.I explicitly stated that I was not interested in debating, and my other two replies in this thread were not aimed at YOU as the OP directly for a reason. Just wanted to hear some analysis on RadFem from someone being intentional about specifying them since most of the posts in this sub are about feminism broadly without a modifier, but okay. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 05:39 AM |
| 3 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.Could you elaborate more on that then please. Not interested in arguing the right vs left thing beyond the other replies I made, but what are your expanded thoughts about RadFem having a pretence of anti-establishment, and why would say liberal feminism not have the same pretence? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 05:23 AM |
| 2 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.Wondering because you’re specifically saying RadFem- do you think (non radical) feminism is broadly similarly right wing? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 05:00 AM |
| 6 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.Nope. Insanely absolute statement that does not reflect society in the slightest. Your definition only works if you’re using “left wing” as a synonym for socialism. Historically and in political science, the left has included both anti capitalist movements and reformist movements that accept capitalism while seeking stronger labor rights, redistribution, regulation, and welfare programs. If left wing begins only at anti capitalism, then social democrats, progressives, and many center left partie… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 04:57 AM |
| 2 | The Industry of misandrist Rad Fem content , and how the system is for it not against it.I don’t think that belief makes him not an ally, but it is important to be aware that many leftists truly do oppose liberalism, so it’s a mistake to group them the way we commonly do. I’m sure I can understand why he thinks liberalism is right wing, but as long as we’re talking about the American political paradigm, that will always be a deeply unserious claim that I have not once heard a good argument for. Nice name btw | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/05/26 04:43 AM |
| 3 | The phrase "men are afraid of other men" is just a feminist way of calling men weak.Perfect example of why I’d rather be “weak” in the eyes of random women, than dead and out of my wife’s life | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/05/26 05:35 PM |
| 7 | Why do you think gay men have never been seen or accepted as "men" by other men?I’ve said this before and got downvoted for it, but people should just state their countries in their posts upfront instead of being vague about “society”. Like yeah many of the comments will be western-centric because most people that use this sub are probably western for a variety of reasons, ofc they will disagree and maybe not intuitively recognise if you’re speaking from the perspective of a culture they’re unfamiliar with Not to mention replies like this don’t help at all with that | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/05/26 04:48 AM |
| 1 | "Why is it always such a big deal when a woman says she hates men?"What is darvo I see that a lot on instagram comments | /r/EverydayMisandry | 26/05/26 04:39 AM |
| 3 | The Male Loneliness Epidemic And The Homeless: Similar DiscourseI mean the already existing infrastructure of women’s shelters would just be spread far and wide to the point where the majority would have an easy pathway out- there’d still be that 30% of men on their own. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/05/26 04:47 AM |
| 8 | The Male Loneliness Epidemic And The Homeless: Similar DiscourseI was having this conversation with my wife yesterday. When people say political will, they tend to just mean that women care about it. If homelessness was 70% women, they would care and there would be so much political will that it would absolutely be solved in America. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/05/26 04:27 AM |
| 10 | A study done on 361,645 job applications in almost 30 countries over the last 40 years discovered the hiring bias in society is actually against MEN, not women.Every single office I’ve been has been majority women. I was one of two males on my team in my last job, and it probably wasn’t a coincidence that we both happened to be black men in an office full of white women… 🤔 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/05/26 05:34 AM |
| 5 | They’re so closeThey know this bc they’ll wheel out the stats and large percentages of male virgins when they want to insult incels lol. They pick and choose when to pretend all men are womanisers w high body counts vs incel virgins | /r/EverydayMisandry | 19/05/26 03:48 PM |
| 5 | They’re so closeI still do not understand how they get away with this. They will morph homophobia into just being a product of misogyny, but can’t understand they’re being misandrist when WOMEN are judging other women as being disgusting for having sex w males bc they view male sexuality as disgusting. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 18/05/26 05:02 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter