TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Parvan Archive

View 1 post and 66 comments by Parvan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Parvan/r/MensRights22/11/09 06:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I put this as a reply to someone's comment but I believe it deserves it's own post That photo is from Portland Oregon, not Maine. It's taken just off Burnside and those homeless people are chilling at the train station out of the rain and wind. It's also right next to the wonderful Portland Rescue Mission which is why there are several homeless people there. Also, the Woman's march in Portland worked with organizations to collect donations for Portland's homeless population. I'm a supporter of M…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:02 PM
5

That photo is from Portland Oregon, not Maine. It's taken just off Burnside and those homeless people are chilling at the train station out of the rain and wind. It's also right next to the wonderful Portland Rescue Mission which is why there are several homeless people there. Also, the Woman's march in Portland worked with organizations to collect donations for Portland's homeless population.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:39 PM
2

I never claimed it was justice, I just asked why they didn't post the follow up and summed up the follow up article.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:32 PM
36

Why would you post this and not the result? TLDR: Jury sided with the boy, awarded refund of tuition and coverage of all expenses and the judge is deciding tomorrow on the issue of reinstatement.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 10:18 PM
2

I know people do things when they are drunk that they won't do while sober. I highly doubt that the gentleman in the incident would normally behave in such a way while sober. That does not mean that because she wouldn't when she was sober that it is rape. If she appears to be able to consent, consents and he has no other knowledge about something that would render her unable to consent then it's not rape, regardless of whether or not she regrets it in the morning.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:02 PM
1

That would all depend on if he was the one who gave it to her, or if he knew that she was under the influence of a date rape drug. Obviously if he knows she is under the influence of an intoxicant that renders her unable to consent then he should be prosecuted for rape. However, if he does not know and has no legitimate way of knowing due to her behaving in manner consistent with being able to consent and she consents then there is no mens rea and thus no crime has occurred.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 07:58 PM
15

Seems like a good measure for consent to me, unless you think we should follow the one sip and she is off limits rule. If you can walk unaided and talk then you can consent.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:40 PM
3

Except it's the bride's grandmother, not the alleged victim's.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:27 PM
1

This is not Shit Reddit Says mens edition.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:49 PM
-1

I agree completely, I certainly don't think a woman's clothing causes rape and don't think a woman should be told that. But frequently when this topic is brought up with feminist the idea of teaching women basic safety precautions such as not drinking more than your limit, understanding the area you are in, keeping a buddy with you is shouted down as victim blaming when in fact it is basic safety precautions. Personally I feel rape isn't something avoided in most cases by wearing less revealing …
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:22 PM
-1

No one is saying, oh she wore slutty clothes she deserved it, or that the rapist shouldn't be punished. What they are saying though is that knowing that wearing certain clothing can increase your chances of getting raped that you need to do a risk analysis. For example, I know walking around Compton in gang colors is generally a bad idea and increases my chances of being the victim of a violent crime so i don't do it. If I did it doesn't mean I deserved what happened to me or that the perpetrato…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:17 AM
9

What happened to John Bad Elk v. U.S., which established the right to resist unlawful arrest.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:00 PM
12

That is awesome
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:58 AM
12

no, just been reading a book with a lot of dumb rhymes.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:58 AM
29

let's make it clear, black, white, yellow or brown if you support mens rights then welcome to our town; gay, straight, lesbian, transsexual or queer if you think men have issues we welcome you here
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:31 AM
2

Age of consent in New York is 17, this was definitely illegal. "Sex with a person under 17 is a Class “E” felony if the perpetrator is at least 21. (“Rape in the third degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.25; “Criminal sexual act in the third degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.40.)"
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:03 PM
32

She was 25, he was 17. They had been having relationship problems for a year, meaning the boy was at most 16 when the relationship started. New York's age of consent is 17. Reverse the genders and the title would be "Man kills his molestation victim after she breaks his phone."
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:02 PM
1

I've had numerous feminists tell me that the solution top men's issues is through Feminism. I've never once heard an MRA claim that the solution to womens issues is through the MRM
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:56 PM
15

Honestly, I doubt anyone gives a shit that she was banging a 17 year old, the problem is if a male had been doing it he wouldn't have gotten diversion and damn sure wouldn't have gotten a reality tv show. He'd be spending years in PMITA prison and the rest of his life on a sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:59 PM
2

I find the stated context of the sub versus the obvious context juxtaposed with the commentary on the creepshots scandal amusing, but parent comment is right, that link/comment doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:03 AM
3

Comments like this one only reinforce the stereotype that all men are perverts. In the future keep your sick fantasies to yourself. /s
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:08 PM
4

I think it is all about the context of the concert, Carrie Underwood is pretty family friendly. If it was Kesha then yeah I'd have a problem with this, or Eminem with a female fan since their music is so overtly sexual and innapropriate. In the same light (I'm not very familiar with pop musicians so I am going to go with movie stars) if Robert Pattinson had a 12 year old female fan who held up the same sign I wouldn't find anything creepy about him giving her a peck on the lips in front of a cro…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:11 PM
6

1 week and I am banned from both LBGT and now Atheism+ I can understand lbgt since I called rape culture bullshit, but I thought I was being pretty respectful in a+. I was officially banned for being abelist by saying "crazy" and "durr" here: http://www.reddit.com/r/atheismplus/comments/zpj6b/meta_attention_downvote_brigade/c66nzzp Prior to the ban I was warned by the same mod regarding the earlier conversation I was having with another mod who actually seems like a really reasonable person. I j…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:55 AM
3

I wasn't on it, not surprising, I was curious though.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:44 AM
4

Tagging for later
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:24 AM
9

Thank you for confirming for me that I was banned for being an mra. Because I damn sure didn't say anything hateful about women. I stand for equality for everyone lbgt, man or,woman, but I also completely disagree with feminist theory and rape culture. That doesn't make me a misogynist. Congrats on being a hateful person who is marginalizing others, suppressing their views and generalizing everyone in the mens rights movement a women haters. keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:48 AM
6

That is incorrect, single parents are deployed all the time. You are required by the military to have a Family Care Plan including all necessary paperwork related to guardianship during deployment, support for the children, healthcare and anything else that might come up. You can and will be punished by the UCMJ for missing movement if you do not deploy because you failed to execute your Family Care Plan.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:02 PM
1

Oh god. I'm actually close in age to her daughter than I am to her I'm 17 years older then the girls and the mom is 22 years older than me.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:35 AM
9

Well that is why I said she pretty much ruined it. The girls wanted to hike, swim all the crap you do when you are camping. The mom wanted them to go into Flagstaff and go shopping. When they went hiking/swimming with me the mom flipped out, we got back from swimming and the mom had hooked her trailer up and was literally pulling out when we got back and wouldn't talk to us at all. We pretty much said good riddance and had a blast the rest of the weekend. When I brought the girls home her mom wa…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:38 AM
39

Single dad here, I've run into this once. Ironically it was after the girl had come over for sleepovers about 10 times, but when I wanted to take them camping the mom suddenly didn't think that was a good idea. I invited the mom along and she pretty much ruined the camping trip. First she insisted we go somewhere with showers instead of a more rustic campground. Then she got pissed cause I took the girls hiking and swimming when she wanted to take them shopping in Flagstaff. She ended up leaving…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:46 PM
0

And then he stopped. Note this is after she: *Stayed in the car despite them asking them to get a motel room and then asked them if they wanted to drive around and showed the two girls condoms *After her friend decided she did not want to accompany them and got out of the car *After she had sex with the other boy for ~30 minutes Told the boy in question he could if he stopped when she asked them to. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure to the girl it felt horrible and she probably did feel raped, but to…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:15 PM
0

Uhh... not necessarily. If I'm a second away from climax and the girl says stop and I climax, that does not make it rape. I am sure most anyone who is not an "all men are rapist" feminist will agree that a man continuing for 15-30 seconds does not constitute rape. To me it is obvious from the jury's questions posted that they really did not want to find this kid guilty but felt they were bound to do so because of the letter of the law, Of course the feminist crowd would say I raped my ex-wife th…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:16 PM
1

Ahh I understand, so it's a dirty underhanded trick.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:38 AM
1

Can anyone explain why he had to plead no contest to another crime to get out of jail? Is there a legal reason for it? Did that make it so they could release him quicker?
/r/MensRights30/08/11 05:38 PM
1

I love how every time it is a female offender you always find the relationship described as consensual
/r/MensRights30/08/11 01:24 AM
2

Yeah and from his description of the events it sounds like she knew what she was doing at the time.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 06:32 PM
12

By your logic he should also be pressing charges against her for raping him.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:15 PM
3

Why do I have a feeling she got to keep the house?
/r/MensRights02/06/11 11:04 PM
17

"She approached the boy at a high school sporting event in October 20099 and lead him to a storage room where the the consensual sexual encounter occurred." If the genders had been reversed (and the article had been proof read) it would have read "He approached the girl at a high school sporting event in October 2009 and lured her to a storage room where the the rape occurred."
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:28 PM
6

How in the hell am I acting like a white knight? By pointing out that everyone telling him to call the cops is giving him bad information? He'd find out himself when he called them. And no the mother does not have more rights to posses the child, absent a court decree or some clear case where the child is in some sort of danger no cop is going to take a child from one parent and give it to the other regardless of it it is the mother or the father.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 02:42 AM
16

Hate to swim against the tide here, but unless he has a court order stating he has custody the cops are not going to put themselves in the middle of it. The mother has just as much right to have the child as the father does. So OP, what you need to do is go in first thing Monday morning and get an emergency custody decree. Then if she won't hand the kid over you can call the cops.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 02:22 AM
-1

Also I wrote to Citizen's for Change to see if I could contribute to this young man's defense fund. Maybe some of you could do the same.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 03:48 AM
-1

If the girl's parents have no problem with it then it will be a very hard case to prosecute. A hostile witness, the victim's parents taking the stand in the perpetrator's defense, basically as long as the young man was smart enough to refrain from admitting he committed the crime he will probably get offered a deal.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 03:39 AM
3

Saving to come back after work and read the PDF
/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:51 PM
2

And I believe that the court has a lot more information about this incident then you or I and is in a much better position to judge the facts.
/r/MensRights30/03/10 04:59 AM
2

My whole point is that none of this conjecture makes any sense seeing as how there are so few facts in the article and they are not in context.
/r/MensRights30/03/10 02:45 AM
-1

By all means don't let him around your kids then. The point I am trying to make was that obviously the court has a lot mroe information and evidence about this case then we do, so second guessing them based solely on this article is more reacting to a common fear of child predators than it is a reasoned response. No one wants their kid to get molested, and the guy obviously fucked up, but he is still their father and could still be a positive factor in their life. They are taking steps to protec…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 08:36 PM
1

And you're jumping to conclusions about the whole situation. You don't know what type of Child Porn it was, what the age inappropriate affection was or under what context he invited her to sleep in his bed. Since we have no facts try assuming the situation is this Father gets caught with 3 pictures of 16 year old girls in sexually suggestive poses and is charged with child pornography (this has happened before). After serving his sentence he tries to regain custody. Months after the initial fili…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 07:57 PM
5

Of course it is appropriate for her to sit on my lap, what is not appropriate is for me to ask her to sit on my lap.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 07:47 PM
4

Yeah a family member has bonds of affection for a child that a stranger would not have. If my brother got busted for looking at child pornography I wouldn't keep my daughter away from him,but I would restrict the way he interacts with her. Just like this court did. What I don't understand is how you don't see that you are letting media manipulate your feelings and cloud your critical thinking skills. If the court thought there was any real chance that he might abuse his daughters they would not …
/r/MensRights29/03/10 07:07 PM
1

At night time the girls are sleeping and thus not able to fend for themselves. If their father stood over them and sarted jacking off or trying to photograph them with their legs spread during the day time they would probably notice, but if he did it at night they would never know. So basically the judge probably feels that the girls would report any abuse they are aware of so now he just needs to protect them from abuse when they are asleep.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:58 PM
6

It looks more sinister when you use terms like "filming images of child pornography on his computer" that don't even really have any meaning. You don't "Film images" so how could someone be "Filming images" To me that means taking photographs/movies of images. They are trying to imply that he produced child pornography, but they can't say he did that unless he really did, so they use something nonsensical and threatening sounding.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:52 PM
1

The man was likely found to have a very low chance of re offending. His daughters are at an age where they can and probably would tell on him if they knew what was happening. When they are sleeping though they might not even know, and if they were alone and did wake up he could easily claim it was a nightmare. They would not put his children back with him if they thought he was going to hurt them. No one would have blinked an eye if the judge had given him no visitation. This restriction is just…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:42 PM
3

I can kind of see what you are saying, but we really don't even have anything besides the general gist of this story. The judge had the facts. We don't even know what type of child porn it was, I know in a lot of countries child modeling pictures are considered child porn. Would this story have aroused your ire if it said "Man with pictures of girls in bikinis gets to see daughters"? And then in the article if it had said "One night when his daughter couldn't sleep he told her she could sleep in…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:36 PM
5

It said it was inappropriate for a child of that age. What is appropriate for a child of 2 or 3 is not for a child of 8 or 9. When my daughter was 11 there was nothing inappropriate about me inviting her to sit in my lap, now that she's 14 it's a bit of a different story. However the article does not state what he did or why he did it, it merely states that it was found to be inappropriate affection. Last time I checked no court would ever refer to an act of abuse as affection. And no I wouldn't…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:23 PM
3

That does not equal "made sexual advances towards the child" What type of affection was it, who said it was inappropriate? Did he cuddle with her, peck her cheek, rub her shoulders, massage her thighs? What were the circumstances behind the father inviting his daughter to his bed? Did she walk in saying "Daddy I can't sleep" or did he come into her room and say "Daddy wants you to sleep with him".
/r/MensRights29/03/10 06:04 PM
5

Nowhere in that article does it say he made advances on his daughter it says "demonstrated affection toward her in a way that was, in all the circumstances, inappropriate for a child of that age". That does not equal "made sexual advances towards the child" What type of affection was it, who said it was inappropriate? Did he cuddle with her, peck her cheek, rub her shoulders, massage her thighs? What were the circumstances behind the father inviting his daughter to his bed? Did she walk in sayin…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:49 PM
1

It's called being careful. He (the judge) obviously does not believe the father will try anything, if he did he would not send the girls to live with their father. He is following the recommendations of the family court counselor who stated that, "However, at night, when they were asleep or partly asleep and not aware of each other's whereabouts, they would be less secure." The article never states anything about the father behaving in a sexually inappropriate way towards his children. It has so…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:31 PM
3

Yes, the article is very sensationalist, what else do you expect from the news media when reporting about a male sex offender?
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:22 PM
9

The article says "The father was convicted in 2007 of three child pornography offences, including filming images of child pornography on his computer. He also created links and shortcuts to child porn sites." To me that sounds like he was taking child pornography images and making slide shows out of them, not that he was creating new child pornography.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:19 PM
2

As I said, "combined with the girl's fears and the age inappropriate behavior"
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:15 PM
8

I think the restrictions are appropriate considering all the facts presented. While watching child porn does not mean he'll molest his children, combined with the girl's fears and the age innapropriate behavior it makes me feel that these restrictions are justified. I'm sure a large part of their fear is from hearing about the case from the mother, but regardless of where it came from it is real fear. Honestly I think this judge made an excellent call. It gives the father a chance to stay connec…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 04:30 PM
17

She also violated his rights under the Soldiers and Sailor's relief act. This divorce will be nullified in a heartbeat. She's likely looking at a charge of adultery as well under the UCMJ. I hope the soldier gets his kid back.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 08:21 AM
1

That is actually a good idea. I will give that a try.
/r/MensRights23/11/09 04:30 PM
1

I am already pretty well aware of what needs to be done. There are two problems keeping me from doing this myself. I have 0 idea how to write the order as I am not a family law lawyer. I also do not live in Texas and thus need someone in court to represent me.
/r/MensRights22/11/09 07:49 PM
1

It's actually more complicated then it seems, the visitation has to be very specifically defined as well as who pays for what. I don't mind the cost so much as the insistence that it all be upfront.
/r/MensRights22/11/09 07:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter