TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PassageFinancial9716 Archive

View 2 posts and 146 comments by PassageFinancial9716 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I’m always half trolling. It does appear to be mostly about sex and money. I think people on subreddits like this are just very cerebral and it’s hard to find that out in the real world. 99% of people interact in a very surface level manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:11 PM
4

I don’t know lady I’m not quite yet finished writing the sequel to Utopia. But I am allowed to observe what appears to be a blatant backhandedness of your sex when it comes to proclaiming positive moral notions whilst still remaining a clearly primal being when navigating relationships with men, and making their final decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:05 PM
4

I think everyone on this subreddit has brain rot. It's like you are extracting from my comment single words, and then using each of them as some sort of buzzword to emphasize a relation between two things that I never made myself and then saying I said it... I'll try to ELI5 it for you: You're saying that these advantages women have are given. This does not mean the consequences of the usage of those advantages are given. The connection here is that the advantage is clearly being exploited, goin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:34 PM
6

There seems to be a disconnect between your parent comment and this. I don't see anywhere that I am referencing the voluntary nature of relationships, or mandatory ones for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:53 PM
8

I never said anyone should or shouldn't have free will. It appears you saw the last two words and just decided to ask a random question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:50 PM
7

Modern society is predicated on basically one thing: relationships. Since women have a much easier time of achieving such things, it is clear they aren't freely given, rather, they are a byproduct of the conglomeration of all of our behaviors as a species. The female advantage is clearly innate, and not given. The benefits of the societal structure we live in is not something that is necessarily given, but evolves over time to fit higher-order needs. Ergo, what is referenced here is a case and m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:45 PM
3

lmao dude dating is over. like 3-4 girls share the same guy to do only fans and not work. its just about money and chad who gives af anymore about this shit
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:37 PM
2

This literally sounds like my entire life as a mid 20's loner. It took me a long time to realize I'm supposed to interact with somebody before I love them LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 06:57 PM
1

That’s definitely not true from my experience. Yeah maybe some girls thought I was cute in high school, but the amount of attraction girls around that age show for me as a mid 20’s guy is staggering in comparison (and many late bloomer guys have this experience) It’s really no wonder guys that are shy and struggled with girls at a young age don’t settle down…it’s kind of too late. The emotional support from a relationship is not necessary as you struggled through everything substantial alone alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 08:36 PM
1

Sweet summer child
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 08:10 PM
1

I don't know, my comment was slightly tongue-in-cheek. For most of my life, I would have related to the story so much, the whole being cute but can't get laid sort of thing. People stare and smile but you just cant seem to lead interactions correctly, or push people away that would. It's a mindfuck and I understand the psychotic malaise that comes from it. The fact that we are required to balance both control (lead, introduction) and lack of control (rejection, calm attitude, no bitterness) is u…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:47 PM
2

What is it with all these people dating or being boyfriend/girlfriend but never having sex for that long? Is that common? I thought most people built up to that way faster than a month, but I was never good at getting into successful relationships anyway. And he's a psycho for obvious reasons - good-looking but can't get someone to fuck him. I don't see the issue with doing him a favor; his life would have literally taken a 180 but instead he's probably back to being a creep and is back to squar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 05:35 AM
7

Damn sounds like a friend group I could finally enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 04:31 AM
1

Someone with literally 0 mathematical ability trying to create some unhinged scenario where he is correct. Sure sweety, 99% of attractiveness is height. Hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:12 PM
1

It doesn't have anything to do with weight of variables. There is no consistent meaning that can be assigned to the resulting values (such as multiplying percentiles giving a new, meaningful percentile), which was my entire point. Then you went off on a subjective tangent on what you think the most important factors are...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:03 PM
2

lol. The way decimals and percentiles work, the more attributes you add, the smaller the number gets. Take a chad with 8/10 face, 8/10 body, 6/10 wealth, 1/10 since he lives with parents, etc. This literally has no meaning. You're meant to find a sort of average by adding them and then diving by how many there are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:24 PM
3

lol. I'm sure some men went down that path.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:53 PM
1

You could switch the word "Men" for "Women" too if we are going to keep it fully honest (while letting the sarcastic tone remain). Pining for guys out of your league based on popularity (as pure superficiality cancels out for both genders, I will use this) is not "trying to get a relationship". Not so. It's a very primitive game we are forced to play, but I don't expect normies to understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:54 AM
1

I have no interest in forming an opinion on the matter, but these views seem misguided. Of course, free will is an abstraction that has nothing to do with the biological imperative of a species. It is just one thing that makes us feel good as modern human beings. However, this and related abstractions clearly have failures, and I wouldn't always rely on them to make such judgements. Usually, one has to entrust others and society as a whole that the foundation has merit. If it leads to complete e…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:54 AM
5

Well, here is your answer. Female autonomy (to the extent that it is in contradiction to the biological natural order) leads to human extinction. Oh well, everyone. It was a good run.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:30 AM
2

no man never give up never surrender rofl
/r/seduction04/05/24 11:51 PM
2

You'd think with all this "freedom" they would actually be a lot nicer to men, instead they expect non-chads to basically be silent eunuchs lmfao. I'm hispanic and I'm pretty sure literally everybody including average men are fucking in like latin american countries. But in the U.S, if your looks can't boost a women's ego you are fucked. Weird goddamn place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:38 AM
1

The true black pill is every girl you had a crush on probably was obsessed with a more attractive guy. And same for girls that were attracted to you - they weren't interested in the less attractive guys that pined for them. It's all a looks and social status game. Your emotions are pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:23 AM
1

cope
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:24 AM
0

I don't recall saying what you did or didn't do. I'm simply explaining the male experience, but I guess that is meaningless!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 09:48 PM
2

I think the point I was getting across was that superficiality in men is just as common in women (which means very common), not that it was the only that thing all women look at. It does seem to be the case that unless a man blows women away in some specific case (looks, money, status, skills), she gives like no effort and many men can attest to this. So, even if you are a certain type of woman who cares, it takes someone very special. Just as a man will be bitter if he works out and loses weigh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 07:07 PM
0

He's not wrong though. Looks are the repellent, not personality at all. You can be unhinged and crazy and to some girl that sees it literally doesn't matter, she'll try to fuck. Or you can be the most genuine caring guy to a girl you really want to bond with and you can't even so much as be her friend because you aren't tall or popular enough or whatever. It's literally all superficial with you all in some way which is very common in a lot of men, too. It would be nice if society would be honest…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 06:01 PM
3

This comment and your flair make me feel like you recently learned how to use semicolons and try to use them in any way you can lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:15 AM
1

Yes, but that furthers my point about status. I never went back to finishing my mathematics degree after covid, and just live off of online poker now. There are some things very few people are able to do, but there is almost no status involved and I will never meet someone at those levels, that is why working out or singing only helps a little which just furthers the point about hookups only too. That does seem to be another misconception women make - intelligence is equal or similar at all to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 06:09 PM
1

Not necessarily. But women are clearly much more primal in that regard from what I've seen. Even "intelligent" ones will spout your nonsense, hookup randomly, then want to act like everything is no big deal and pretend to want a deep relationship again. I only mention it because it is the next best thing to try. From what I have seen, they develop so much experience that a certain genuineness and innocence is not attractive to them at all (what is attractive is cringey game/"rizz" which tells me…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:54 PM
1

Until they need a hookup. And the gap between what women and high IQ men consider "intelligence" is extreme. The guy that is confident, and does well in social situations simply has a halo effect. You will never find any girls chasing or interested in intelligence. It's like 100% looks and social status. It's funny that you could literally ask any man in that position and it has no effect by his life experience, but you have women constantly say they drop their panties in favor of them over unin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:41 PM
2

That's how we die alone
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 11:32 AM
1

I've never seen a group of people talk about something interesting a single time in my life. If you aren't a normie that cares about rigged sports or pop culture propaganda I guess you're fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 11:29 AM
1

Yes, people have actually found me attractive, but there were a lot of issues with being a shy sensitive boy at the younger ages. I definitely carefully crafted my personality to not engage or benefit anyone but myself as I grew older. That definitely affected certain chances for me as well, too. But, oh well. No one is going to wait for us, and we can't turn back time either. Might as well integrate back in before we fall further behind as that is really the only solution. You will be completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 11:20 AM
3

No, you just made very weird assumptions about the original comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 12:24 AM
3

If that was my point I would have made that suggestion by writing that phrase, but I didn't. It was simply one example that showcases how it is hard for us to believe in her struggle. It was you who missed the point entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 12:18 AM
6

Being someone's partner during high school/college does not require "settling down" during that time period (casual, break up, break, dating multiple people, etc.) Besides, they never even said that was a requirement to be their partner for that time being. Who knows if she was even looking to get married at that time. You are are making a lot of assumptions about this. Your question is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 12:14 AM
6

It doesn't go without saying because it is inherent in your choices. You can say height isn't a requirement, and then go ahead and date only tall guys. You can say job title doesn't matter, but not date a tradesman. You can say one's bank account doesn't matter, but not date a humble man. What you say your intentions are doesn't prove anything - what we are doing here is analyzing actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 12:09 AM
6

That's why there is an instant lull in the conversation. They assert the ridiculousness of the 6' requirement, but can't think of the last time they saw a non-tall man in public with a girlfriend either. That is to say, it is extremely uncommon. I don't need some neckbeard woman saying, "I saw this one guy..."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 12:04 AM
4

I mean I don't really know. It really depends on the setting. I don't know the last time I saw a guy under ~6' with a girlfriend in public. That's just one example.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:46 PM
8

Yeah, but that's clearly not the point I'm making. I'm saying you all hide behind saying you have low standards, or the bar is in Hades, when there are a plethora of "icks" you can have, and every time I hear crap like, "I'm just looking for a decent guy" it numbs my mind at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:41 PM
10

So, then that's not a relationship "standard", that's a prerequisite for a conversation lmao...if that's how women define "standard" no wonder we have no idea what's going on. So, like when you all say the bar is in the basement that just means you had irreconcilable differences in compatibility, not that he was a cheeto eating neckbeard who lives with his mom. That doesn't actually mean the bar is in the basement though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:31 PM
8

That would have been like most of the guys in her high school that were college-bound and those she met in college lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:15 PM
16

When women say this they usually use "Chad" as the prerequisite, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:10 PM
1

Yes. They struggle to get chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 11:09 PM
–

They sure do. That's why they fight to the death for the opportunity; hoard females; sneak sexual access, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:23 AM
–

Then move on if you lack the intelligence to figure it out big shot editor. I don't really need to see your comments saying the same thing again and again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:17 AM
–

I misunderstand completely what your previous comment is referring to, that's all. I am well aware of horniness. My post does not address the simple act of sex as it relates to ego. I am talking about a general Ego that is the arbiter for who passes on their genes and who does not. I am not talking about people having sex day in day out, specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:15 AM
–

My post does not address justifying rape in any way. I am not sure where this keeps coming from. I am simply observing society and how relative morality is going to change and keep changing given enough apathy to dysfunction, which I outline as it relates to the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:11 AM
–

My post does not address justifying rape in any way. I am not sure where this keeps coming from. I am simply observing society and how relative morality is going to change and keep changing given enough apathy to dysfunction, which I outline as it relates to the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:10 AM
–

Okay!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:03 AM
–

It's extremely hard to develop a definition for genetic "strength" that is not circular, given these cases and similar ones. I don't know what successful means to you or me, but biologically those males would be considered "successful". Perhaps strength wasn't the best word. But of course, the alpha(s) is the one who passes his genes on the most, whether or not sneaky agents are able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:01 AM
–

Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:57 AM
–

I have no idea what that means, but it doesn't sound good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:54 AM
–

I don't know lady. I don't try to fuck women every day. This seems like a personal issue you have with men, and that is not what I am writing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:50 AM
–

I've pretty clearly stated I am not suggesting anything. I am observing the state of society and how relative morality comes into play.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:48 AM
–

I'm glad you enjoyed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:47 AM
6

If it is nuanced, that means there are subtle elements involved. I cannot possibly write this position in one sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:47 AM
–

Perhaps I was confusing. I use "strength" to refer to something like "evolutionary strength", i.e. the males that adapt best to their environment (whether selfishly or not). It's really hard to not develop a circular definition here, so I might not add any detail for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:44 AM
–

I do believe men have those instincts, but I am not sure how "natural" they are to have for females you do not know or are not related to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:38 AM
–

"Requirement" is simply referring to the fact that moral objectiveness requires an abstract notion. This is brought up since a large retort to what I am saying is "rape, rape, rape", but if we take your subjective morality it's clear that both individuals involved have competing interests, and both are equally valid. One might have worse societal consequences, but due to moral subjectivity that is irrelevant. An objective notion cannot stem from human creation, it is "metaphysical" in some sense…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:31 AM
2

I believe my comment is a bit more nuanced than what you initially thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:21 AM
–

From what I've seen in my life, I would definitely doubt that for most of you LOL. Too late, I am already crying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:20 AM
–

Human females have a choice in their mate either by our own creation as social creatures or god-given. If it is our creation, it's justification doesn't rest on anything except preponderance in social stability, and is uplifted or degraded as societal circumstances change. So, the importance is in alleviating this dysfunction, not ignoring it, or trying to retroactively justify ignoring it after the fact, as the relative morality would also change in that instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:18 AM
–

This is where people keep getting confused. I am not suggesting anything. One of the things I am specifically pointing out is that you are seeing those comments from people for a reason. As the culture changes and devolves for one reason or another, the social morality ends up changing as well. You can continue to say, "Look at these crazy people, what are they thinking", and do nothing, or try to address society's concerns. It seems to me that the former leads to too much dysfunction, and you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:06 AM
3

Nope!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:01 AM
–

I'm not sure how the cooperation of humanity negates anything I am saying. And of course I know men aren't rape monsters, I am an introverted man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:59 PM
–

I'm not sure where I said mating resistance wasn't natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:56 PM
–

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:51 PM
–

It means that females choosing who to mate with is a gift for humanity and higher order advancement, but when taken to farthest extension becomes a curse that favors the female Ego as it starts to take the place of societal stability. It could have been given to us either by our own creation, or god-given. If it is a creation, then it's fall is amoral in nature, and so it's consequences!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:50 PM
–

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:46 PM
–

I definitely don't grow enough facial hair for that. And I'm worried I would get my cheetos stuck in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:44 PM
–

I don't know why we developed the way we do. But to think female animals do not avoid both weak and strong males alike shows misunderstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:41 PM
–

It's not biological; it's social. That's why only human cousins do it. It is developed from strong social cohesion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:40 PM
–

No, I actually like my neckbeard. I look like Henry David Thoreau.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:36 PM
–

I would not be surprised if a caste-like system develops from this, as the genetic and social differences will be so obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:35 PM
–

You just keep attacking me like a child who doesn't understand what is going in. Perhaps this is out of your league, please leave me alone and move along.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:23 PM
–

And relative morality is ever changing within a society and the changing environment. So, if society devolves in certain ways, by your own standard, what could successfully continue society might be considered evil today, but would maintain the society itself. If we define morality by what maintains society, then evil things can be considered good. In other words, there is no basis for that definition, sir. It is clear we'd want success of a society to be a byproduct of morality, not the reason …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:22 PM
–

Because you have nothing to say that's why. If you don't want to think don't bother even being here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:18 PM
–

That both male and female play a part in upholding the stability of society. Having either male or female Ego dominating the evolutionary structure is unbalanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:16 PM
–

I added to it ma'am. I make a lot of errors that's why there are so many edits.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:15 PM
–

Ok, but you aren't reading carefully...you keep trying to minimize biological amorality into an emotional response. So, what happens is we deny this biological expression in favor of the female ego to be our evolutionary arbiters, which seems to be either some sort of gift, or man-made addition to create stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:08 PM
–

No. Succeeding in this expression is considered strength biologically. Whether the female or other males are able to stop you or not is the entire matter. So, what happens is we deny this biological expression in favor of the female ego to be our arbiters, which seems to be either some sort of gift, or man-made addition to create civilization and stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:05 PM
–

It all stems from the amorality of biology and the requirement that stemming away from that requires an abstract moral notion. It's not too hard my man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:01 PM
–

I don't follow Jordan Peterson. The amoral nature of nature is understood by any educated person. The god part comes in because if you want to have a basis that goes against biological amorality, there must be some offspring in our evolution that requires a different evolutionary basis other than strong vs. weak. Whether this is pantheism or some other god is not of concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:00 PM
–

I'm not justifying anything. There is no "yikes" here. Biology itself is amoral. It's pretty basic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:59 PM
–

It's pretty easy to understand. Please upgrade your reading level. I know there are some big words in there for you. If you are going to to be lazy, you can read the bold and try to pinpoint where I am building up to that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:54 PM
-3

It is pretty intellectually dishonest to degrade those people unless you are also religious, though. The biological imperative of animalia is to have the strong pass on their genes - the female of the species to become the arbiter of this lineage expression is extremely recent, and it's for mammals in particular. The fact that the females of the species develop negative emotion to our biological imperative is not necessarily our fault or a matter of right or wrong. The females of other species d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:37 PM
2

I'm sorry you feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:07 PM
1

Oh, my bad if I wasn't clear. I was mostly referring to your last paragraph on why so few men are there. It's a bit of a learned behavior after a while. I believe women might go clubbing for a lot of reasons, but one of those includes chatting up the tallest men there. I'm sure a lot a lot of tall men would retort: "Oh yes, women definitely go clubbing for sex." It's a matter of perspective. And of course, I have no knowledge of what their intentions were with me unless something happened in tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:51 PM
0

Your writing is confusing, but what I think is meant to be in quotes is literally no direct quote of mine. Of course, one can only exercise this power in the duration of the relationship. I don't even like to use this wording, but essentially I can't think of a better way to explain it. It's more like someone who is more mature is going to naturally lead the relationship a bit more, and protect the stability of it in a way that two equal parties cannot. And I do not look down on promiscuous wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:10 AM
0

No, I don't want to stop someone from leaving me if they want to leave, which seems to be what your whole thing is based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:58 AM
–

What I am saying is crystal clear, but it's a 1 day account on your end so I'm not surprised you aren't really making sense and just spamming "lol", "chill", and apathetic responses lacking compassion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:57 AM
0

I don't want a slave, though. You do realize people with power over you have the capability to be virtuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:49 AM
–

So, you all put the onus on men either way, to keep yourselves the victim no matter what. If he does do something he is objectifying me, if he doesn't, he's weak; an incel; or give a reaction like it's not your problem. Well ma'am, you can't have it both ways. I don't know how many times I've read women complain about their relationships and what they deserve, but it does seem they don't believe men deserve the same relational fulfillment for whatever reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:47 AM
–

I'm explaining to you what happens if men do not objectify women. You said "I don't think people even can women as humans. We are going to be seen as object in any way." As in - nothing happens for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:41 AM
1

Yeah. I feel a much stronger connection to an inexperienced girl who is somewhat under my control. Now, with the idea of "equality" emerging, this instinct is pushed by the wayside, and it's no wonder the only men that still care are men that just want casual sex. There's absolutely no reason to be with a girl your same age with the same rights. It is imprinted in our psyche that they can leave or cheat on us at anytime and we are left with absolutely nothing to show it. Tell me, how does this m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:34 AM
–

I'm pretty sure it's more like men who never objectified women wake up one day and are an early to mid 20's virgin and realize the only way they will get women is up to increase their aggression which depends on some subconscious form of objectification. You wouldn't want us all to be lonely virgins forever would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:21 AM
3

Yeah, but the point is, a lot of guys missed out for one reason or another. And a lot of those men aren't just going to "go back to normal" because girls got bored of hook up culture. That's going to be a big issue because they want to experience a similar thing before a traditional relationship that they weren't able to for one reason or another that girls were able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:09 AM
1

There aren't that many for social dominance reasons. Believe me lady, I am considered a "cute" guy, but every time I tried at night life to be the aggressor to girls that dressed like this I'm pretty sure they didn't like me for my 5'8" height. Drunk girls talked to me though! Night life does not seem to work for some when 90% of the guys that go out are over 6 feet lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:04 AM
–

But aren't most young women insecure?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 12:56 AM
1

If by more success they mean quantity (and perhaps even quality), it is clearly and undeniably true. I'm pretty sure any guy who went from shy to not could tell you that, which proves it is not all about attractiveness - even if it mostly is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:33 PM
5

After banging the toxic men of course
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 03:28 AM
–

I swear every other time I click a woman's profile she's commenting in that teenmom subreddit lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 03:25 AM
2

You are just picking things to dissect. Clearly there is historical overlap between the terms that made me make this connection. This should be obvious to you. It is standard to separate virtue from obligation, which is contextually what the quote is referring to for the time period and war considerations. It is just funny to me that you took this to mean to get a six pack, no offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:50 AM
1

How the hell could being athletic be inherently virtuous? Your flair makes me think you based this major life decision on that mistranslated Socrates quote lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:38 AM
1

I never said you built it for women. And stop coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:10 AM
4

No, don't you get it? Your reward for a shitty life is to be an robot ATM for women and society. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:08 AM
–

cope
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:06 AM
3

yeah you got your advice from middle-aged copers, the look nowadays is your height and the tiktok aesthetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 10:48 AM
3

Yes, it is nice to be considered for a genuine relationship even if you are different or appear to be rough around the edges. However, this does not appear to be the case here but rather a circumstance involving someone that is not well-intentioned. I understand, but having a flair at all then is a bit confusing, I must say.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:10 PM
9

Don't you think it's a bit strange that even as a blue-pilled woman you still end up with a manipulative, bad person? You had all this time to find someone then once you do it turns out like this. I just don't get it. You were the one chasing, clearly..."blue-pilled" my ass. That's part of what I'm referring to. I'm sorry that happened to you, but I mean wtf. You literally have an account of an entire life of not letting a man get anywhere with you without lying and manipulating heavily. Again, …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 12:56 PM
1

Ok, then you can be my sugar mommy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:46 AM
3

No one's gonna be your beta bux; it's too late. Sorry hun.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 08:12 AM
14

She has a whole post from a week ago about how he actually passed around whores with friends and hung out with strippers and his now manipulating her financially lmao. Wtf is her comment talking about here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 08:01 AM
13

Are you mentally unstable? Your post about your marriage from 8 days ago is completely contrary in all ways to what you wrote here. https://www.reddit.com/user/Eowyn_In_Armor/comments/18lgioh/my_marriage/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 07:58 AM
2

negation[I can go 6 hours(negation[without being able to think straight])] => negation[negation(I can go 6 hours [without being able to think straight]). =>I can go 6 hours without being able to think straight (implied: at some point in time). I don't know how linguistic logic works or what assumptions one is allowed to make on the operative word lol but I think that's the right meaning assuming negation is associative which depends on the system of language the guy is using. It seems pretty sym…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 05:11 AM
3

But mainly etc.!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 03:39 AM
1

Yes, red pill is just a role play. That’s where the bitterness stems from. They themselves don’t feel loved, cared, or respected without having to play a role, so society can go f itself! As for myself, I was never able to get as far this way because everything felt so forced - even when it seems a girl liked me or was aroused they would avoid me for some reason. I had way more girls voluntarily engage with me when I wasn’t red pill acting… Men think in a very binary way even if they aren’t auti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 08:32 PM
0

Most men here are chronically online and slightly unhinged. We kind of just make stuff up as we go along here. Don't worry, you'll get used to it. However, this could be a problem of semantics - have you ever had a one night stand, or a quick sexual encounter that you don't consider a "date"? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:10 AM
1

I think there is something psychological going on where a lot females gave them little to no attention before they went "Red pill" and in return they changed a lot their behavior and outlook on things. So, now that they can get sex and relationships they enjoy the selfishness those same women employed against them, and refuse to do things they don't want to do such as build the family or financially support them. I'm not saying it is correct, but you have to be pretty ignorant to refuse to empat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 03:40 AM
2

What amazes me is that a lot of those men just give everything away once they turn 30. If I was ignored and whatever I'm definitely not sharing it with anyone anymore, a lot of those guys end up just seeing escorts or not marrying the women they have children with. It's one thing to refuse to date men that aren't already at the finish line; it's another thing entirely to ignore them throughout your 20's until you need them. I don't even necessarily fail in this way anymore as a young guy, but ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 03:08 AM
7

i had a good reply to something u/apresonly said but they deleted their account or blocked me and I cant reply in the parent comment lol. They said no man could offer intimiacy they needed and I said me and they wanted me to explain proof: "Well I did like girls here and there and it seemed you had to play some sort of role to get them any further. But if they would bend down in front of me or something I would avoid it because I was nervous. Or if one would follow me I would be nervous. Essenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:38 PM
–

im kind of just trolling while i play online poker
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:20 PM
1

me
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:17 PM
-1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:17 PM
5

replace "men" with "chad" whenever they post lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:10 PM
3

chad*
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:08 PM
4

harems
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 04:16 PM
7

Yeah I mean whenever a guy has a connection to you, it's likely that eventually he'll want to have sex with you. It doesn't mean that's "just all he wants to do" c'mon..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 06:04 AM
1

they think women aren't attracted to masculine faces for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 04:37 PM
3

All I’m hearing is “Arrogance is reserved for hot guys/athletes”. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 04:08 PM
1

Thanks, but we are smart in other ways. It is how we get our validation. That's why it is common for those people. It is not done out of malice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 12:47 AM
1

the feeling of self-importance is unparalleled. it is very hard to not be condescending to the world at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 03:14 AM
3

clearly shes never been around philosophy or math majors/grad students. it would flip her worldview upside down. she prob thinks finance bros and business majors are smart lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 03:09 AM
5

you cant develop emotional attachment at all if girls your own age are completely avoidant (before knowing them, during a friendship, dating them,etc) to all but the most good looking/tallest guys. how is that so hard to grasp?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 05:53 PM
–

At least you are being honest. Thanks for the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 12:32 PM
0

I bet if he got divorced raped, or falsely accused he ain't philosophizing about his being lmaooooo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:35 AM
-1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:34 AM
-1

Yes, pity sex would do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:33 AM
7

Did Chad not text back today? Is that what this is about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:29 AM
1

This comment is ruthlessly true as written.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:09 AM
6

ur the only one i see actually cutting through the bullshit lol. i was a mentalcel for a long time but once snapping out of it it does seem kind of pointless anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:06 AM
0

Finding a committed man that still cares about a career and making good money, but also doesn't ever want kids is such a pipe dream with all due respect. It is pretty dense to be so unaware of the subconscious motivations of why men do what they do. Oh look, another woman that doesn't want kids but still wants a provider so you can do your mediocre art on the side, and bang other men in his house when you get bored. College wasn't enough of an extended childhood for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 06:20 PM
1

I have noticed that at certain times you can be what many of them actually want, but still get no effort from them. I remember a few times girls would approach me and I felt they actually liked me, and those are the times I would be interested in a relationship. Not interested in doing all this work for someone that thinks they are better than me for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 04:03 PM
2

just take steroids bro. just have a father that owns a company bro. just be able to afford a house in 2023 bro
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter