TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Patchwirk Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Patchwirk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

-30 to 200 with gold. Something is afoot.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:27 AM
2

Could you provide examples? I can think of the opposite, where SRS has been removed.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:21 AM
3

I'm not an American, sadly. I would otherwise. And don't tell me "Just make a fake account", I'd rather not lie.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:55 PM
1

How else can we get the word out on this?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 06:03 AM
0

Please, tell me how its satire.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:52 AM
8

inb1 wage gap So I, assuming I'm black as asphalt, can go around saying things that are racist ("y u krackers got such small dixx? i thought u hav enough munny 2 pay for biggar dik surgury?"), but its not racist because of my skin colour, but I'm white as snow, anything I say that's racist ("lol u wish u wer us u cuud have all de grape drank yu want, mayb a father as well!"), then its racist? Holy fucking shit, theignoredgender is going to have a field day at this.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:41 AM
9

Lets see how Samsmug portrays gender roles in this ad: Implying men are severely inferior to women, or at least not as evolved, by using the title "Evolutionary Husband?" Sloths who are retarded, incapable maintaining good hygiene or having a legitimate conversation aside from watching TV and eating. The only way that lifestyle is supported is because of women, who are incapable of changing things themselves (except if they have a magic box) Men cannot cook for themselves, or choose not to, and …
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:32 AM
3

I saw in a Metro article that he said something to the effect of "If I'm willing to take a test, you should be too.". I can't say whether the tests are actually ways to test, but at least he's not backing down.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:53 PM
1

Except its fake. And are you encouraging that men hit women back? That's not the best solution, fighting fire with fire.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:10 AM
1

[citation needed] srsly doe, do you have a source on your claim?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:48 AM
1

No, it's a joke! ^<sup>/s</sup> Based on what you've said about it, it would be considered abuse. If she intentionally meant to harm you, then it is straight out abuse.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:48 AM
1

Of course not, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have a say, which you are implying.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:21 PM
3

Gee, its not like cisgendered straight white males could ever have friends with people who are questioning their sexuality, are of a different race or have changed their gender. Yeah, all white guys are awkward fucks who should try to stay within limits and not try to diversify themselves. Agree or disagree?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:37 PM
3

So does that mean that all cisgendered people are automatically terrible people and should have no say in LGBTQ rights discussions?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:23 PM
2

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4759 How about that? The kind of person that you probably hate the most is being oppressed! Looks like your discriminatory practices are working, nice work. troofi 4 u
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:15 PM
2

Just like misandry dont real. Please, give sources on why this phobia doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:02 PM
1

"Ian Coley, a student on the Associate Student Government Diversity and Inclusion Committee, later said white heterosexual males are not qualified to hold the position of associate vice president of diversity and inclusion." Hm, his name sounds like he's a white male. Let's search him up! What is this? A picture of him?(Privilegur mirror) "His involvement with the Inclusion Task Force stems from a desire to appeal to the silent majority of students who are hampered from joining the discussion by…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:02 AM
13

Not relevant.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:31 PM
2

I think that if both genders were treated equally that we'd be doing fine. Even still, men managed the world for a long period of history and did pretty well, I'd say (feel free to correct me). What makes you think that giving up the reigns would be a bad thing?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:13 AM
2

patriarch Nice choice of words. Yeah, but not all men are war like and patriarchal, that's the thing. Sure, men aren't the same as women, but that doesn't mean that we should try and conform to something that we aren't simply because MS says we should. I should be allowed to be my own person, and use the differences that I have with people to benefit.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:03 AM
8

It basically says that women are the superior gender, and that men terrible when it comes to work habits compared to women. That's misandry, and infringes on the thing that MRAs and feminism both theoretically strive for: equality.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:53 AM
1

balls Check your prividge, you cis scumbag. But seriously, those points are absolutely bs.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:43 AM
1

While I'm not okay with any kind of homophobia, I don't like those kinds of jokes because they are so often used.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:43 PM
2

lacks proper grammar obviously photoshopped still posted here OP has fallen for for someone's trap!
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:31 PM
5

right in the feels What a crappy title. As for the article that CrossHook linked to, I believe that a series of ads should be run, depicting people of different ethnicities, genders and sexual orientation should be run.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter