Payze- Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	Part of the growing divide between men and women comes from the idea that men should silently accept misandry as justified payback for patriarchy Agreed. Be the change you wish to see. An eye for an eye will only make the world go blind.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/04/25 12:47 PM
3	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. Words have meaning, I fully agree. And words have nuanced meaning. He gave consent to impregnating her by spreading his seed in her womb. They both agreed that he cum inside her (consensus). By inseminating the egg cell, you have a kid. It may not have a heartbeat yet or brainwaves, but it's offspring DNA. Your point is that they both consented on getting rid of the baby afterwards by taking Plan B. And she didn't do that. And here is where we seem to talk past each other: 1. He said "I don't wa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 09:44 AM
6	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. I am from where actions give consent as much as words do. If I grab a bread from a bakery and bite into it, my actions give consent to buying the bread. He took actions to nut inside her. Therefore his actions heavily imply consent from his part. He wasn't forced to nut inside her. The moment you nut inside a woman, you consent to the chance of your sperm inseminating an egg cell and leading to a child. All of that happens even way before taking Plan B, if it's taken. That is the context here. I…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 09:19 AM
8	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. I'll break it down in easy words: Both had sex. Both knew sex can lead to pregnancy. Both know that raw-dogging has the highest chance of leading to pregnancy. They both took individual action and both are adult. How is he entirely free of blame? It's not a transactional thing where if someone doesn't stick to the agreed conditions, you can just undo it. It's something that involves a potential baby, which can decide your next 18 years, atleast. If I absolutely don't want a baby, I do not take a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 08:03 AM
5	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. I don't understand where I shift blame. But maybe I will learn something if you explain to me. I am not shifting blame from her. I am blaming both her. And blame him at the same time. It's pretty clear that sex can result in pregnancy. It's being taught that contraception can fail. Yet both took actions that can lead to pregnancy. The reason I also blame him is: 1. "He loves going raw" -> Not a smart idea if you don't want child. 2. "The father doesn’t want a child and makes this clear to the mo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 07:45 AM
14	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. You can't make that comparison, atleast where I am from. As sperm donor, you sign a legal document that denies any legal right and responsibilities. When I "just nut" inside a girl because I feel like it in the spurt of a moment, I don't sign a document there. And let's not start talking about the notary deed, which is sometimes needed for sperm donations. Edit: Here a quick excerpt from my home country about this: With the new Sperm Donors Register Law [...], legal paternity on the behalf of th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 06:56 AM
29	Men who were clear and consistent about not wanting kids are no morally different than sperm donors to me. Seemingly unpopular take nowadays, yet still: Maybe don't nut into a woman when you don't want a child? And especially not someone you just met and can't tell how much you can trust them. Even condoms and other protection aren't 100% safe. If you provocate a pregnancy by doing stuff like that because 'you felt like it', then you shouldn't be free from consequences. You can't have full freedom without taking any kind of responsibilities. The argument to this is, if he didn’t want to have this fin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 06:47 AM
–	How do men view sex? That's the point of your post, right? ;) Don't mind it, happy to help.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/25 01:24 PM
–	How do men view sex? Colour me an unmanly man if you want but ... I agree, "thrusting a penis in and out of a vag" can be quite monotonous. But that's not the point of sex, if you ask me. I desire to be desired. I love to find out more about my body and her body. I love knowing which buttons to push and which buttons I want to have pushed. I want to see my girlfriend happily panting and being exhausted from her orgasm - just like I want to have that privilege too. And if I don't manage to do so, I want to grow so I …	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/25 12:44 PM
1	The best way for men to weed out the inauthentic women is to get separate orders on dates. I disagree. The point is how to increase the chances of being with a "genuine" woman (EDIT: I guess you mean "woman who is genuinely interested in you"). And your argument misses that point entirely, from what I feel like. Because the same argument you made can be easily made in favor of women if you turn it around. We live in a world where there are actually women who will go on a date with a man just for the free food. [...] This is sad and embarrassing for women. We also live in a world where…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 06:42 PM
1	In my country there's a saying that goes "If you want to catch more fish, you should ask the good fisherman for tips, not the fish". It's talking about picking up women, obviously. True. You don't ask the fish because fish won't answer you. It also applies to women, they also don't talk to me. Jokes aside, I think you are limiting your attention to the wrong part of the saying. First off, I think this idiom doesn't fully apply to cases like this, because the counterpart is able to communicate with you. How well the communication actually goes differs from case to case though ... I think it is a good idiom for other cases though. That aside, I think good fisherman is the im…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/03/25 10:12 PM