TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PearsOfWrath Archive

View 7 posts and 411 comments by PearsOfWrath on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Honestly women are practicing their ideal sexual selection already. Can't think of any advice for them. Fuck around and try to trap an alpha. If that fails go for your backup. Men are too simpy to say no and most okay looking women will never run out of options as long as they get married in their late 20s early 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 12:11 AM
3

One way or another I don't think bisexual men prove anything about men. They are hardly representative of all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 12:21 AM
1

Because you're trying really hard to change the subject because I debunked this particular narrative and I won't let you. Loooooool okay girl, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 12:20 AM
3

Yea thats what I pretty much do now with women. There's a grand total of one woman on this subreddit who's worth arguing with and I think she's banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 12:17 AM
8

Beta male qualities Nah what you described is alphas exhibiting beta male qualities. Not betas being betas. As I said, if most average men behaved like these dudes women would say eww and move on. The female sexual preference for bad boys over nice guys is so well known at this point that its mainstream and openly stated by many women, and nothing these novels show suggests otherwise. But yeah, I'm usually of the opinion that theres very little point arguing with women on this subreddit, with al…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 12:39 PM
13

I'm not sure there's really a point in challenging your view here. But anyway... As I said to you in another thread, the point the 'manosphere community' were making is how these novels show the traits women are looking for. As for the rest, I'm sure the majority of men would agree that: a) If a man was to have the beta characteristics that the men in these novels sometimes develop the women would lose sexual interest. b) And if not, its only because the men in these novels are maxed out in ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 12:08 PM
2

And yet 80% of men get pussy and the frequency of sex goes up when they enter relationships. Relationships, not marriage. And no shit you get more sex when in a relationship vs single. Although no doubt there are many couples who have a good sex life after marriage. Not on average though. You just proved her point. You guys are merely cherry picking what "proves red pill theory", just like with everything else. First of all, nothing controversial or horrible about women is being said here. Women…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 11:58 AM
3

Man the women coming here and denying your point by saying shit that isn't even contradicting it are fucking hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:38 AM
2

Simplifications like that are often useful for discussions. The reality of course is somewhat more nuanced, but many men will experience a reality that basically fits perfectly into what TRP describes for betas, and others will fit perfectly into what TRP described for alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:36 AM
7

Okay, take dread. Dread is a strategy, certainly not a tenet. And the guys in these novels are always portrayed to be heartthrobs who can get any girl they want. Women are attracted to men like that. RP is not for super famous young hot billionaires, its for normal men. Dread is a strategy for normal men to make women realize they have options. Thats all. Now personally I think the way some talk about it is kind of cringe, but anyway. Some beta characteristics? The elements I listed are defining…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:35 AM
32

Nothing you said counters the crux of what the red pill is about. You just focused on some random shit. And not even all of that made sense, like: He's willing to change for her That's literally what the red pill says. Women will spend their best years trying to get the best possible man who has infinite options to fall in love with them, change his 'toxic masculine' behaviours, and adopt some beta characteristics to become a faithful loving husband and a father. If/when that fails they'll go fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 05:23 AM
1

Bro I studied electrical engineering and am kind of introverted. The excuses are kind of lame honestly. I disagree with you and think this is pessimistic bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 09:00 PM
1

You mean the category of not doing volunteer work and leisurely classes? No I mean the category working from home, who didnt make friends in college, who have no social hobbies, who are part of no groups or clubs, who have no friends at all to introduce them to new people, and who dont go to church.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 04:02 AM
1

What exactly is stopping people from meeting people at work? If you work from home, don't go to church, dont go to school, don't have social hobbies, and don't already have a bunch of friends then yes, its hard to meet people. No shit. I'm not disagreeing, I'm saying its a really small percentage of people who don't fall into that category. Also half my friend group I met after the age of 26. I'm nearing 30 now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 06:51 PM
1

Did you make no friends at school or work? Right now of my lets say 6 best mates, 1 I met randomly, another is his best friend. 1 I met at baseball. 3 are college friends. Yeah you make a lot of friends in college and work, and then you meet their friends. Honestly I could meet a lot more people if I wanted to but I dont want to. Hangouts... like if someone has a birthday party or just a random party or a games night or if you go out camping or kayaking or insert group activity here as a group. …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 10:18 AM
1

The trip was planned by my friends friend and they basically said the more people the better so I tagged along too. I didn't know anyone there but most of the new people I meet are friends of friends. Well you don't say. Its not only school and work its five things: School, work, friends, hobbies/sports, church. If you don't have any of those things then you belong in a rather small group. Hangouts happen regardless of school or work for me and its easily the best place to meet girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 06:27 AM
–

Wtf is this sub tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:56 AM
1

Currently I've made a few new friends at my MBA program. I've met a few chicks in courses. Earlier this year I met a few people and a chick at a camping trip. I only knew one person in that trip but ended up meeting quite a few people and smashed that chick. Shes currently dating another guy from that trip. Also went with a few of those same people kayaking and met some new people on that trip. Other than that.. I literally meet people all the time and I'm not even extroverted. Before this I mad…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:42 AM
1

I'm pretty good looking but I'm not talking about myself I'm talking about all my friend group
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:23 AM
2

To be honest I don't think people exaggerate online dating enough. The fact that some studies show that women match with 1% of people is insane to me. Yeah I don't think thats true. It seems as though most women just want to socialize with their friends, and most do group activities strictly with their friends(i.e. escape rooms) Not in my experience. Less and less people are going to nightclubs. They are dying out. Not in my experience. Fair, but for my case specifically, most of my friends are …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 01:16 AM
12

My personal experience: People here exaggerate how difficult it is to get pussy on online apps. Its also pretty easy meeting girls at events and group activities. Believe it or not, single women also like to socialize. And only someone who's never been to a club will say theres a 9 to 1 ratio there. Clubs aren't for 25 year olds exclusively anyway, obviously you are going to see older people there. Go to a bar or a club near a college. Your friends should also know quite a few women. Their girlf…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 08:36 PM
4

Too much text.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:22 AM
2

Lmaoooooo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:20 AM
1

Yeah I clarified already in my post. Eventually finding a monogamous relationship and raising a family is important for a well adjusted man. Not including childfree, poly and other degeneracy in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:13 AM
2

well adjusted
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 01:11 AM
2

well adjusted
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 01:11 AM
1

Every non degenerate man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 01:09 AM
2

There's absolutely pressure to do dumb destructive shit for pussy when you are a young man (teens and early 20s.) TRP definitely zones in on this ageis group though. Post-college a man who has shit together is definitely attractive to a lot of women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 08:20 PM
6

Monogamy should be a goal in your life as a well adjusted man. After all, you want to raise a family and want a good woman to support you and raise your children with you. But never push to make it happen. Men have everything to lose from marrying a trashy woman, so they need to be extremely picky when they choose a wife, and most men just aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 08:17 PM
-2

Never listen to women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 10:37 AM
4

Dating is way easier in a big city. Idk how many people here ever lived in a small town. If you are a mid 20s woman in a small town and not taken theres a potential red flag there. Dating women in a large city is pretty easy though, theres a lot more people and there is a dating culture beyond teens and early 20s. Finding an early 20s small town girl is your best bet to find a decent wife though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 10:36 AM
6

I lived in Boston and various other big cities in America for all of my 20s. I always imagined myself getting married in my mid 20s and I had a good job and everything ready to do that except a good woman. I dated throughout my 20s with quite a few women and never once came across someone worth marrying until I moved back home in a small Midwest town due to COVID. Most men just will never find a woman worth marrying, especially if you live in a major city. But that won't stop them from using the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 10:32 AM
5

This is one of the most important things to learn in life as a man. Don't listen to what women say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:53 AM
8

Nearly 30 myself, I have to admit that personally I dont find many teen girls that attractive anymore. You can definitely see the youthful beauty but a lot of them look like children to me. But the change between 17 and 22 is huge. I'm on a college campus these days and its so easy to distinguish between 17 and 22, but not so much between 22 and 25. There isn't any looks decline for women between 17 and 22, I think they just become more adult looking, but still hot. There is a decline from 22 on…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:52 AM
7

You can look down on someone and still want to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 02:15 PM
5

As men become more risk adverse, so marriage/birth rates drop and not due to some feminist utopia. If men became truly risk adverse, there would be little to no Fire Fighters, Police, Military, Husbands, Fathers etc. What are you even saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 02:15 PM
-1

Women are normally not socially conservative. The majority who seem to be are religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 05:42 PM
1

C A P I T A L I S M I S G R E A T
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:14 AM
2

my nigga
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:13 AM
2

How many of these 27% of men would prefer watching porn over having actual sex with a woman? I mean.. maybe I don't get it, I don't like or watch porn much, but it can't imagine these people would rather sit at home jacking off to some overproduced shit with ugly pornstars than to have actual intimacy with a woman. I agree that porn is part of the problem. But women being more attention whorish than ever plays a part. Having access to shit like Tinder plays a part. Women having greater financial…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 02:54 AM
2

Personally I think one of the main reasons is that modern life has made men more and more beta. Look at the soy boy white guys in their early 20s. Easy to see why they are having issues dating. Meanwhile, women having greater and greater financial security without needing a man has made it even harder for betas in the SMP.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 02:33 AM
1

I kind of agree. But porn didn't start in 2008. I realize its more normalized and accessible than ever, but I also think there are a ton of other social changes that have happened that make men not even want to try dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 02:29 AM
2

My nigga
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 02:29 PM
5

I nominate u/wingbark. Fits the criteria. He's also black, so Littleknownfacts will love him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 02:28 PM
1

I value the women in my life. Just because you gave me one counterexample doesn't disprove my argument that women don't like and don't do well in hard jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:14 AM
1

Congrats to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:03 PM
1

Nagging is how women make the men they married more beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:58 PM
1

Why man spends less than woman? Poor people spend less. Men aren't retarded Why woman on average tends to apply for easier jobs? Because they can't do the hard ones. And now the easy ones are paying almost as well due to all the diversity and equity initiatives. Also, TRP theory is much less relevant in China.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:51 PM
2

The men here are right then.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:38 PM
-1

If a woman cheats her marriage is over. Cheating is fucked. Especially in a marriage. People take relationships before marriage way too seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:38 PM
4

I keep reading posts/replies by TRPers saying that men hit their SMP peak later in life ... 40 to 45 seems to be the most common age bracket that these guys claim I think you misunderstand. They are claiming their RELATIVE sexual peak is then. Past 35, the woman's sexual market value is decreasing rapidly. A mans decreases too, but not as fast. At 40 or so, I'd say a man has the most options he will ever have RELATIVE to a woman of the same age. Of course, the number of available women by that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:25 PM
2

No conservative sexuality was not female centric. I mean, it focused on female modesty, sure. But it was not based on the sexual proclivities of women. Now it is. Women exert the greatest cultural control, and we see that reflected in sexual norms. This is the look but dont touch generation. Fits in with female sexuality completely. Total attention whoring, reflected through what they wear and the photos they put on platforms like instagram. UNLESS its explicitly for men, like strippers and nude…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:15 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:13 PM
2

Its not a conservative stance. Its female centric. So naturally its a little more selective and opposed to things like porn and prostitution. But there is nothing traditional about it. Understand the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:10 PM
1

and into academics. fuck no. For dating, a dumb ditzy girl is better. For marriage, she has to be kind of smart but only because you want good genes for the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:05 PM
3

we have moved towards more traditional stances on marriage, sex and love. That isn't 'traditional marriage.' Traditional marriage was about children and necessity. Or if you were elite, connections and politics. Sex and love is new marriage. It has only been the norm in recent times. Maybe traditional marriage could mean gender roles in marriage? But is that what millennials mean? I doubt it. 'Traditional' here is undefined. Besides thats bullshit. Most millennial opposes gender roles. How have …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:02 PM
5

Because women age pretty bad and men mainly go for looks. I get no pleasure of saying that tbh. But its true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 01:59 AM
1

a) thats only for marriage b) everything I said above for black men applies for spics too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 01:58 AM
1

They are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:34 AM
1

Look them up my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:34 AM
1

High economic status, way higher SMV, more masculine than asian men, way higher social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:07 AM
1

Statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:07 AM
2

Yeah, which suggests men dont really care about this in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:06 AM
1

No posts about race. Oh jesus. Thats not even a rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 12:01 AM
1

Nice guys finish last
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:55 PM
1

Sure the idea that a fetus is a human person right from conception is retarded Christian crap. But is a fetus is just a 'lump of cells' at say, 15 weeks? Of course not. On the contrary, most nations in the world dont allow abortion after a certain period (usually the first trimeste). Most European countries have 12-14 week limits. I believe Islamic law imposes similar restrictions. Most of Asia has restrictions. But it remains legal here to abort it until ~20-24 weeks. Something women have repea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 03:11 PM
1

Yeah a subcommunity full of incels and men being edgy has really showed you how evil men are in nature. Calm down girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 09:59 PM
1

So shes 24, has had 7 kids, and has been married, divorced, and has remarried. Yeah, where I'm from we call that white trash. Not sure what you are trying to say though. Pregnancy can fuck up your body, but that woman is just not fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 09:29 PM
1

A lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 08:32 PM
1

Ive heard different things from different women. Maybe it depends on how far along you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:35 PM
6

If abortion is a serious thing then women should treat it seriously. Instead, since they want to keep it legal and widely accessible (since not doing so would impact their careers and sexual freedom), they've done their best to dehumanize the fetus so that women can continue having abortions without feeling guilty. If its so difficult, women should make sure that they dont get pregnant. Its not that difficult to get an IUD, stay on birth control, and use a condom. But around a million women have…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:49 PM
8

Awww life is so fucking tough :( Acting like an adult and responsibly using birth control and a condom is so hard. :( Googling an abortion clinic is so hard :( Then I actually have to go to my subsidized abortion procedure? Fuck man! Why is it so hard to get rid of this fucking parasite that I've been blabbing about is so insignificant and easy to get rid of? I have to take a pill that gives me mild discomfort?? FUCK. We should have abortion clinics around the corner with great big teddy bears o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:07 PM
2

Its always justified. A man who isn't a misogynist is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:01 PM
1

Yeah I knew some dipshit would say this. Depends on the usage of the term more. But yes, I know how ratios and percentages work. Thanks though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 12:34 AM
3

Yeah that means 15% more women are retarded than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 11:14 PM
3

lol thats happened several times to me with your posts too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 11:13 PM
9

What explains the discrepancy? Women are fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 09:41 PM
5

no
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 03:20 PM
0

I can't make lewd/savage/offensive jokes around female friends. I can't discuss politics with them because the political views of 90% of women are retarded. Can't discuss tech, my job/industry, or my hobbies because most women aren't interested in any of that. I mean, some women have male brains and you can have good conversations with them. But the majority of them are cunts. I come from a small Christian midwest town and the women were raised to be feminine and the men masculine. In liberal ci…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:51 AM
0

I've always found women to be very different from men. When someone tells me they dont treat their female friends differently, well.. I think that either makes you very unique, gay, or delusional. But yes, in all honesty I find most women to be quite annoying. Its very pleasant to talk to feminine women and spend time with them every now and then. But as close friends? Being around each other often? Never going to happen. No way. As for your other questions, I don't have too many friends where I…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 12:14 AM
3

Eh I have a few female friends, but we aren't particularly close. I don't understand how you become particularly close friends with a woman unless you've grown up together or you are gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 11:28 PM
2

Women don't understand the concept of self improvement. Men who aren't already well accomplished are disgusting to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 08:20 PM
0

lmaoooooo
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:14 PM
1

Less whiney? what??? Which planet are you from where women aren't whiney nigga I want to go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:14 PM
1

Maximize your looks. Work out a bit and do physical shit. That doesn't just develop your body it gets rid of the disgusting soyboy look that some men have. Learn. Not. To. Give. A. Fuck. A lot of men are fucking frightened, and women SMELL that and realize this dude is a loser. Go talk to girls. Get rejected more. Laugh it off. Maybe fuck a hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 07:27 PM
0

Both are attracted to those who will give the best babies. But a man has much lower standards since he can impregnate multiple women in a year whereas a woman can only give birth to a single child in a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 07:22 PM
1

Stop being a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:02 PM
2

I'm 33. I'm sort of brainwashed by red pill in saying my "peak" is to 35 or 40. No its not. Your RELATIVE PEAK is in after 35. At this point womens value is dipping massively, far faster than yours is. So your relative value - relative to women - is higher than it will ever be. But overall peak value for a man is in his 20s, no doubt about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 12:28 PM
2

Night. Preferably while they are asleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 11:46 AM
2

Because if a woman is horny she can go on tinder and get 90 matches with decent looking dudes within 2 hours. And if she wants to get laid she just needs to go to a dude and spread her legs. Men work for sex, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 05:43 AM
3

Obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 05:40 AM
1

Yeah I suppose I spend a lot less than most people. I'll probably have to spend a lot more on personal things when I have a wife. But even then, I'll probably have a fair bit left over to handle a family of 4. I mostly agree though. If you have a LOT of kids, like 6-7, you should, and probably will have to, move to a cheaper neighborhood. Money is definitely a factor, but its also a question of priorities. A lot of people would rather go on a few vacations and buy nice things rather than have lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:45 PM
3

Fuck. Well spotted.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:26 PM
9

No. Yea. Yea. No. No
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:14 PM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:08 PM
1

Eh, I calculate 40,000 for 3 kids, if wife stays at home so I dont need childcare, and if they dont go to private school which is perfectly fine considering the public schools here are great. About 10,000 per kid and then another 1,000 a month to move from my 1 bedroom to a 3 bedroom. Not too difficult for professionals, I'd say. The average salary of professionals here is ~90,000. I make 120. Sure, 40,000 is a lot but what the fuck else am I going to be spending it on if not my kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 04:53 AM
10

Have you ever invested in the stock market before? Such minor ups and downs can't be chalked up to boycotts or investors losing confidence. Its 2% change. That's nothing. Give it a few more weeks. Investors care most about sales, than anything else. While it seems clear that a boycott will reduce long term gillette sales, the short term effect has been mixed.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:16 AM
1

Eh. Not really. People overestimate the annual cost of riasing a child. Maybe if they were going to private schools.. sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:49 AM
1

Where do you live where single mothers are common? And how old are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:47 AM
1

I find it very rewarding regardless. Necessary, even. But my perspective on this is one that is really only held by males - children are important to me for the sake of legacy. And I'm willing to put up with whatever for the sake of that. I don't think women give a fuck about legacy. Also, my main roles as a parent will be in providing and giving direction. Obviously less time consuming than what women have to do. But thanks for the input.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:46 AM
5

Nah I don't. Just personal experience. Many white men are quite emasculated and wouldn't cheat if an 18 year old beautiful naked blonde girl crawled into their bed. Meanwhile white women have been repeatedly told that they aren't responsible for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 07:39 PM
0

Among white people, almost definitely women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 05:33 PM
7

Marriage will become even more of a joke than it is now. Women will find even better ways of filtering out all the betas. AF/BB will become even more open and widely practiced. White men will become even more emasculated. White women will become even more degenerate, and it'll be harder and harder to find non-mudsharks. The good thing is by 2050 western culture will mostly be dead, and foreigners will start to influence our dating culture with theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 05:31 PM
1

These terms mean something different from a RedPill perspective. Although even there the term is disputed. I use Alpha to mean the type of men who are largely uninhibited, and wild. Possessing of many of the traits that women find attractive for purely sexual encounters.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:14 PM
1

They were locked up, as beta patriarchs often did to alphas throughout history.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:55 PM
1

I see quite a few of these relationships among middle/lower middle class social classes. Especially considering the area where I am doesn't have a lot of black people. It is pretty liberal though. I expect many of these 'relationships' are short term. When I was in college I used to hang out with a few black guys, who regularly used to get with white girls. With as much, if not more, ease than white guys. But these were mostly flings.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:50 PM
1

Kids aren't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 02:36 PM
2

Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 02:34 PM
1

Yeah. Four preferably.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 02:34 PM
2

Well, men generally care about legacy. Women don't, really. But otherwise yeah I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 01:20 AM
-2

Yeah I know, its funny how trash women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:50 PM
3

Anecdotally I want 7 kids And I would bet my hat that you (and most of those women for that matter) are either religious or live far from the coastal United States (if you are American.) Like sure, small town girls in whothefuckcares, Missouri, want to have many kids. But I rarely come across women like that in Boston. And yeah yeah, I know there are a lot of different factors involved. Don't really care about the rationalizing, the fact remains that there is a huge correlation (and I think ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:45 PM
1

Lmaooo. Well I wouldn't expect different from incels and should-be-incels. I mean he's not saying that 'hey son, I regret having you because it ruined my body and limited the amount of time I could have spent doing cocaine and fucking random dudes in nighclub bathroom stalls.' He's saying 'hey son, I'm a fucking failure and most likely you will be too, I regret having you.' Its a different kind of fucked up. But its women who actually regret having children because of the added responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:19 PM
1

Well, er, beta patriarchs do. No doubt a lot of men are lazy pieces of shit these days. But I do think more men desire large families than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:14 PM
0

True, but the kind of woman who wants children is a dying breed, especially near the coast and in urban areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:13 PM
3

Haha. Nah, no conspiracy. White women just want to get fucked and have the government pay (contraceptives and abortion) to keep them free from the risks involved in doing so. That's all they ever desired. We only just realized that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:12 PM
-1

Most women in the west seem to be doing their best to avoid this hardship, leading to below replacement fertility. Without men to force them to have large families, most women went childfree or want one child at most. But no! They love kids so much. Men don't desire 'relatively easy lives.' Men chase success, challenges, power, legacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:08 PM
3

Feminism is puritan in general, but in a very different way than 'colonial puritanism.' Colonial Puritanism was a rule of beta males. It was patriarchy. Repress female and male sexuality for the purposes of establishing order and stability. Feminism doesn't care about order and stability, it promotes repressing male sexuality but not female sexuality. So yeah I don't agree with the term. And I don't think they were being 'micro-aggressed' either. I do think that their culture - specifically thei…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:25 PM
5

That speaks to me more of the general racism towards white people in liberal media. But yeah, that too.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:01 PM
14

Oh no doubt. Black men aren't immune from feminist actions, they suffer like the rest of men, but feminists can't criticize them, which I find hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:42 PM
7

White men are not perceived as harmless little bunnies. They are more harmless, but regardless of that the feminists have done their best to portray white males as the main enemy.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:30 PM
32

Right, the way white women treat black men often seems so fucking racist. Objectifying them as sex toys and using them to piss of their daddies and show how liberal they are.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:28 PM
1

the problem with your 'argument' is you are projecting what you want out of a relationship onto others. For you I guess it doesn't matter if your wife is having some other nigga in her ass, or if she gets knocked up by some other dude - but most men aren't ever going to accept that. And besides, even with a DNA test, this completely fucks up the family model.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:50 AM
0

Thanks for telling us all about your sex life in detail. Very interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 04:59 PM
1

It wasn't an "invention". You get what I mean though, right? So fuck off with the semantics. It doesn't favor betas, it gives them a chance Thats the same thing. And oddly enough, women themselves were reporting higher happiness when they were "sexually repressed by betas". That is odd, yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 01:29 AM
3

If you were an alpha you wouldn't be making this thread and saying what you are saying. You wouldn't be bitter about your past. Actually, your bitterness over your past makes your mindset really fucked. And fucking many women won't change your mindset or make you an alpha. What you need to do is grow up and move on. I'm not trying to insult you by saying you are not an alpha. An alpha is merely a subgroup of males, and you do not belong in that group. Neither do I for that matter. Also dont look…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 05:15 AM
4

Alpha and beta-ness is not set in stone. I'm an example of that. No you are not. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 04:25 AM
6

All men truly desire fucking many women. Denying that is merely a defense to cope with the fact that you are unable to do so. Of course, wanting to fuck many women and wanting to raise a good family are not polar opposites. You can desire both. And betas generally desire both, whereas alphas only desire the former. What is true is that the abundance of free sex that women are handing out makes it more difficult for betas to cope with their situation. You can't really be satisfied with one women …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 03:48 AM
2

What? Most women on Tinder I met did jackshit. But yes, I think it might skew professionals because they tend to have less time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 03:25 AM
5

but in my mind I am sad for them and just pity them. Hang on. If sexual freedom favors women, why pity them? Your thoughts are all over the place. I do agree though. Sexual repression of women was a beta invention. It favors betas, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 03:21 AM
2

Don't have to wonder. She asked her husband for permission to cheat for research in her book. She said she didn't eventually cheat. But the fact that her husband is a cuck tells me enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 02:46 PM
4

The reviews for this book really show how women are pushing for polyamory. Fuckign disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 11:33 PM
1

Fuck the cucks for letting cunts like this 'Wednesday Martin' to run her mouth and say so much stupid woman shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 11:13 PM
1

There is more to it than that. But that's a red flag. It's sufficient to rule out wife material, its absence is not sufficient to determine whether she is wife material. It’s bullshit anyway, people get way more lenient than their stated preferences when they fall in love Well that's what I said didn't i
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 10:58 PM
1

get to figure out who they are Statements like this are meaningless to me. It's women talk. Be specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 10:55 PM
1

I know people are shying away from marriage. It will never disappear entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 06:07 PM
1

Monogamy and marriage are related you twat. They aren't the same thing, but if he's talking about 'lifelong pair bonding' that often means marriage. Which is why I brought it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 11:10 AM
0

Thanks for teaching me something I already knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 01:46 AM
0

Marriage will only be obsolete when men stop marrying. And that hasn't happened and isn't likely to happen. Plenty of men have very low standards. What is interesting is that many women have stopped getting married. But they end up regretting it and just act as examples to other women to get married before their ovaries dry up. Monogamy will always be a thing. So marriage will always be a thing. Even if its become a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 11:00 PM
2

And if she does, she's most likely a slut. Women have the capability of sleeping with whoever they want, and its unlikely that you were the top guy she stumbled across. More likely she's just easy. I'm okay with being thought of as a provider, as long as the girl thinks of all men as such - or at least all men that she has been with. I wouldn't want a woman who is hard to get but boned a couple chads with no commitment in her party days. So yeah, wife material is hard to come by. But a girl who …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 10:20 PM
1

I never said I'm not sexist. I just said I don't find it reprehensible to be sexist, and therefore you labeling me as such isn't likely to make me reevaluate my position. I think being sexist is normal. I find it ridiculous to not have different standards for men and women. That would be absurd. You choose if you have sexist double standards- saying' men think this therefore I think this... ' is a very weak argument. That's not what I said. My argument was that it's not a red flag for men to sle…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 10:17 PM
9

A thing of the past? No, they were never a thing. Not entirely. Even in the past lots of people cheated and separated. Divorce just wasn't as common because men don't usually want divorce and women didn't have the freedom to. We've always aspired to monogamy, putting it on a pedestal while doing other shit like cheating, or divorcing, or having premarital sex. That's what we used to do, and its what we do now. Sex before marriage has just increased because of birth control and the fact that men …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 10:02 PM
6

IRC . 2018
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 08:51 PM
1

Because they want to have their cake and eat it too. And then you have men telling them this and it bothers them because they want to be prime marriage material while having rode the fuck out of the cock carousel. It sucks that they can't have both. But some of the backlash has some merit. Like the whole 'shes not a virgin and therefore not marriage material' shit is weird, as is calling a girl with 5 n count a 'slut.'
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 08:49 PM
1

I can sleep around then get married just fine but yoooooooo can't You can do whatever you want. Men generally don't find sexually promiscuous women to be marriage material. Women seem to care less. The double standard arises as a consequence of these preferences, not MY 'sexism.' Personally, yeah I would want to maximize my chances of having a stable marriage, which means marrying a sexually conservative woman. Whats wrong with that? You are throwing 'sexist' around meaninglessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 08:45 PM
1

The CDC 2002 data seems to be the most comprehensive data we have on this: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/nsfg_cycle6.htm The more partners = less chances of divorce doesn't seem intuitively true to me. Though I will concede that there is probably a correlation between male n count and chances of divorce too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 08:37 PM
0

That's interesting. Though the 233 sample size is kind of bullshit. Whats your n count
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 07:56 PM
5

Well, there's something to consider. Is she really easy and is sleeping with literally everyone she finds somewhat attractive? What if she's slept with 50 guys, and you are just 1 of 50 that she found attractive enough on a Friday night while semi drunk and horny to sleep with. Wifey material? Or did she find you THAT attractive that she decided hey, you know what, I normally don't sleep with guys the first night, but this guy is so attractive that I don't care. I'm pretty sure it's almost alway…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:51 PM
12

That's some retarded logic right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:38 PM
1

and vulnerable with someone else Lmao. Sure, go ahead and be vulnerable with a woman. Lets see how that works out. Red Pill advice is advice from men for men. Women shouldn't read it. And if they do they should control their "I AM SO OFFENDED" reflex and understand that they don't know jackshit about the lives of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:35 PM
1

No. Men and women are different. Sexual promiscuity isn't as much of a red flag in men as it is for women. I have not come across research suggesting that high N count men initiate divorces more. Though, tbh, I have not come across much research done on this topic in general. Also, men generally don't initiate divorces, women do. And furthermore, men don't marry for emotional reasons, or financial security. They marry for stability and legacy. Divorce is incredibly destructive to those things, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:24 PM
4

Pretty much what other people said. Date, sure. Marry, no way. That said, I say that but when you are actually with a girl you like it's hard to do the rational thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 10:14 AM
3

No its not. In the pursuit of finding themselves and finding happiness, women (and many men, tbf) butcher their marriages and the lives of their children. They do that rather than try to repair their marriage. They do that rather than suck it up and be mature and try to make it work for the sake of the children. Just cheating is infinitely better than divorcing. When you marry, your stuff becomes our stuff. That’s part of marriage. Yeah that was part of marriage back when it actually meant somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 10:02 AM
1

What I mean is that you can't just become like that at the age of 17. You become that over time, depending on many factors during your childhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 09:13 AM
-1

EDIT: THIS IS NOT A RACE POST, RACE IS RELEVANT TO THE SPECIFIC ARTICLE AND TO WHO IN FACT IS BEARING THE BRUNT OF THESE ACCUSATIONS AT COLLEGES. RACE IS VERY SPECIFICALLY GERMANE AND THIS IS NOT BAITING OR A CALL TO RACIALIST DISCUSSION, BUT TO CAMPUS CULTURE AND ATHELETES ETC Lmao, had to include this so the mods didn't immediately take your post down. Jesus. Anyway, no surprise that white girls fucking black guys are also psycho rape accusers. Shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 08:17 PM
10

Masculinity. Nothing attracts women like the traits we associate with masculinity. Not giving a fuck, abundance mentality, confident, hard to control, dominant. But those things are all natural, not learned. Betas who try to act like that just come across as loser tryhard assholes. It's the natural assholes women like. Being good looking helps a lot too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 03:15 PM
1

High employment... Decent wages. Consumer prices at an all time low... Whats wrong with the economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 11:01 PM
1

See what women do, don't listen to what they say. The economy isn't even bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 11:00 PM
0

Women say they do but they don't seem to care much.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 10:59 PM
3

Now that's actually a good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 06:37 AM
0

Upper middle/upper class women have never had the most children. Actually, they used to have plenty of children before first and second wave feminism. That might be part of the story as to why. Did you read the rest of the sentence? Those factors are balanced by the immense drop in prices of consumer products. I did read your first article. I did not read the second. Because declining marriage is not an answer. I could say that marriage is in decline because women are more interested in career t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 03:25 AM
0

People want children in roughly the same ways that they always have, by gender, but the world around them is changing. Nah. Finances are not that difficult for the average middle class family. They can afford to have children. They just don't want children. Immigrant families generally have plenty of children, even though they are usually less well off than the native populations. Speaking of which, it is general upper middle class and upper class women who are having the least children. These w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 03:11 AM
2

Call them master and offer to clean their shoes if they let you have a share of their spoils.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 01:17 AM
2

Patriarchy existed and it was great. Patriarchy built Western civilization, and now women are smashing it apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 02:45 PM
1

If you can be sure that she didn't develop those skills from choking on 500 cocks, sure. But in most cases that's what being a pro in bed suggests and I'll pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 02:42 PM
0

Right. I don't see why anyone would care much if shes just a girlfriend or a side ho.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 03:04 AM
2

I'd say I'd want a potential wife to pull her weight but it's not necessarily financial. If she's not making money she should do all the home management and child care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 02:12 AM
2

I want my hookup or a gf to be great in bed. I don't know where this idea came from that men want their wives to be pros in bed. Decent in bed, yes, but if she gives me the impression that shes been fucking multiple dudes constantly since turning 15 I'm hardly going to be like 'man this girl is wife material.'
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 02:09 AM
2

I don't really see how happiness is contagious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 02:05 AM
3

The way I see it is it's everyone's duty to create a healthy society full of happy functional members and some people just need a little push to get there. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 08:09 PM
4

What is society
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 06:01 PM
6

A lot of women don't come often from PIV. As far as I know, it doesn't have much to do with the skills of their partners. Oral is the best way to get your girl to orgasm. As for sexual skill, most members of both genders suck. You know how often we have to deal with trash starfish sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 05:59 PM
0

Jamie and Cersei
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 03:12 PM
2

You need to get the fuck off the pillosphere. You are taking this way too seriously and are getting disheartened. The beta men who grow up to get good careers and then go after 8/10 gold diggers are those who were failures in their sexual life earlier and are trying to compensate. You don't want those men anyway, and they aren't a majority of men. It's not all about looks. Looks matter to a certain degree, sure. Like, you aren't going to get a husband who is an 8/10. But if you are a 5/10 and yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 03:35 PM
2

Well okay, many successful betas become assholes who go after good looking gold diggers to compensate for their lack of experience and attention from these women when they were younger. So yeah, a woman like yourself doesn't have a chance with these men, but then again, that's actually a good thing. I do think that there are men out there who fit what you are looking for and aren't really shallow. As I said, you just need something else to market. You seem sweet. But you seem to have severe self…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 04:03 PM
2

I’ve seen “wife material” referred mostly towards a woman who is down to party, or a woman who knows more about sports than they do, or a woman who is financially successful. REALLY? You've seen wife material being referred to a woman who is into partying? REALLY? We live in different worlds clearly. I don't mean being men want wives to be obedient like a dog. I've mostly heard wife material being used for a domestic, supporting, compassionate woman. It's primarily associated with good cooking s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 03:55 PM
0

Women have women brains. That shapes who they are, what they want, what they value... etc. Women would be miserable being a man. Its a harder, riskier, but more character building life. The only way women would be happy being a man is if they became incredibly wealthy, privileged chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 11:03 AM
1

Women have tremendous advantages in the workplace. The only reason men are ahead is because of whatever meritocracy is left in the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 09:24 AM
3

What do you think men are referring to when they say a woman is wife material? A 'challenging' 'difficult' woman? They don't want a woman who is docile towards EVERYONE, merely one who is agreeable towards them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 09:21 AM
2

No, not a bully. I'm just saying that it's hard to have a perfectly egalitarian marriage in every way, which is what you sound like you want in a relationship. Just don't get caught up in stuff like 'does half of the housework and childcare.' Men aren't good at these things, particularly the latter. He should do the masculine housework, sure, but do you really want your husband doing emasculating housework? Also I should add that if you want your husband to be very good looking in addition to al…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 09:17 AM
1

Almost everyone is racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 09:02 AM
2

Not really. It's not looks and status and money, it's smart preference of the typical mature (post carousel, though not saying that you necessarily hopped on that) woman who desires stability and a good family. Now the men who fit part of your description sound like they would be one's who have their shit together, and therefore they would be men who aren't too caught up in shallow shit like attraction. But, they would also be men who have a pretty decent choice of mates. You don't necessarily h…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 01:57 AM
2

I'm not talking about subreddits, I'm talking about real life. What I've observed, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 01:41 AM
2

kk np grl n yw
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 01:37 AM
2

Nope. I've had 4 partners. Not a lot, I am definitely a beta. Getting with women is almost not worth it as a result. But not an incel either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 01:07 AM
5

agreeable wives, 'challenging' girlfriends/fuckbuddies
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 12:14 AM
2

A good man being: Loving Kind Hard working. Makes an effort to provide for his family Protects his family Has a sense of duty Isn’t a substance abuser Doesn’t domineer over his wife or bully her Does half of the housework and childcare if both partners are working full time Isn’t weird about marriage and money Is loyal Does what it takes so their kids don’t live in a ghetto and go to good schools Sounds like a beta. Are you sure that's what you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 12:06 AM
8

nah, they certainly do. Talkin about like 'oh can you handle me?' As if men are interested in that 'challenge.' It's female solipsism, they think being wild, independent, and confident make them more desirable to men in general - because those are traits that they find desirable in men. Men like that type of woman for a fuck. But I don't think women understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 12:03 AM
1

There are always exceptions. We are just dscussing about the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 12:00 AM
1

Black men in general are low class, yes. But it's not just them being low class that makes the women who seek them out low class. It's all the traits that would lead women to be very interested in those men in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 10:20 PM
14

I think most men generally want the 'slightly difficult' women for banging and casual relationships, and more agreeable women for wives. It's always amusing when women think 'free and empowered' increases their relationship value, when in fact it just increases their sexual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 10:14 PM
1

It's a sign of low class and low character. Always has been and always will be. It correlates heavily with BPD, daddy issues, promiscuity, single motherhood, being on drugs, being low class, having STDs, disloyalty.. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 08:29 PM
1

Fucking black men. Have bad hygiene. Being a single mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 07:40 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 07:23 PM
1

It's relevant. Miscegenation lowers your SMV, or is representative of low SMV and class.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 07:15 PM
1

Be a single mom, be a mudshark, have disgusting hygiene... A few other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 06:13 PM
1

Identity politics is a very specific thing. It's a concept rooted in Marxism and intersectionality. It is a concept that individuals of a particular group are, by virtue of identity, more vulnerable to various forms of oppression. Republicans do not use an oppression narrative. The narrative is not that white people are not being oppressed by society, the patriarchy, and various other spooks. The narrative is that we are being misled and making the wrong choices, which are dooming the country. R…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 04:47 PM
2

Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 04:41 PM
20

More. 18 to 30 (average age of marriage.) Around 650 guys lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 04:31 PM
2

70 is really, really not normal. I mean I grew up in the Midwest where the average was like.. I'd say 4 or 5. Then in college I just met so many girls who were so ready to have ONSes. No doubt about it. But they always had n counts of about ~10. And now in mid 20s its still around ~15-20 in any major US city. Like even if they were lying about their number, I do NOT think 70 is anywhere close to normal. I'd say with a 10 average, leaving out all the virgins, uber religious people, and small town…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 04:30 PM
-1

Even male groups dedicated to separating from women(see MGTOW and WAATGM) spend a considerable amount of time trying to impress women and write to them Yeah, I don't see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 03:06 PM
1

Obviously. Men have more value at that age. But not enough value to get endless sex without much commitment. So they get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 03:05 PM
1

Oh definitely not. "new guy every weekend" is incel hysteria and projection 9-10 is the average of the various stats I've come across. https://collegestats.org/explore/collegiate-sexual-exposure/ shows between 12-14 This says 7.5 https://onlinedoctor.superdrug.com/whats-your-number/ This says 10 http://www.data360.org/temp/dsg1100_500_350.jpg I've come across various others (CDC and etc.) that show between 7 and 12. So the average is between 9 and 10. The discrepancy is partly explained by the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 01:53 PM
1

It's kind of the same for America.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 01:29 PM
1

Yeah that's bullshit. The actual average is like 9 or 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 01:29 PM
65

Hence why the average woman probably fucks a new guy every week. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 01:29 PM
1

That's not identity politics. People's tendency to identify with their own group (in this case, European ethnicity and Christianity) and be wary of other groups IS NOT identity politics. It's just xenophobia and tribalism. NOT identity politics. Terms have meanings, learn about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 11:20 AM
3

Right. Low population growth is going to decrease our living standards (as well as spell the death of western civilization.) This is fucking obvious, old people can't and don't want to work. But hey at least we aren't going to all die in the 'apocalypse event.'
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 12:46 AM
1

Half of all wildlife has died since 1970: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/29/earth-lost-50-wildlife-in-40-years-wwf Remind me how that's going to cause apocalypse? 39 million acres of forests lost in the tropics: https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/06/2017-was-second-worst-year-record-tropical-tree-cover-loss See above. We are in the middle of a worldwide Mass extinction, at roughly 1000x the background rate: https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/elements_of_biodiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 10:00 PM
1

We are quickly approaching carrying capacity of this planet, with almost apocalyptic levels of extinctions taking place in animals worldwide Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 08:00 PM
1

What identity politics do the Republians engage in wrt white identity?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 07:58 PM
1

As long as Democrats focus on identity politics and Russia, then yeah they are going to lose. But I agree that if they stand for something more than LGBT rights and illegal immigration, they might win.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 10:07 AM
1

There are more women than men sure. But the ratio isn't 60 40, its 52 48. That's not massively significant. Republicans still have a decent chance of winning each election. 2020 is gonna be all Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 09:48 AM
2

Lol what what? It's perfectly reasonable to assume that the vast majority of 26 year old virgins are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:54 PM
2

Didn't they just win last presidential election? Luckily as Democratic party becomes more full of women, Republicans get more men. Turns out most men don't really like emotional bullshit like 'what about the poor illegals????'
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:53 PM
1

the idea that women are wholesale cynical about relationships is a male fantasy That was what was being claimed in the post I was responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:52 PM
4

Well of course you don't, you are a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:52 PM
2

I'd say being forced into a LTR to get pussy from a woman who probably gave it to several other dudes for a far lower price is the new norm for men. But men can definitely get laid. Incels just exaggerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 05:34 PM
2

Well, clearly women are attracted to men who will pump and dump them. But then they also get cynical about relationships because of that? lol. Female logic. That's like me saying I'm attracted to women with severe BPD. And then when they make my life a living hell, I break up with them and whine about how relationships are bad. And then I go and find another BPD bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 05:30 PM
0

Or claiming that prostitution is the reason why so few men are virgins as time goes on Honestly, that's probably part of the rise of inceldom. But I think its more because of multiculturalism, porn, and being inside too much. I do think women having more opportunity to be selective is part of it. But not the main part.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:41 PM
5

The internet is debunking true love mysticism. Not just TRP but all kinds of anecdotes about relationships gone awry (frivorces, the Aziz story, etc.). It also causes women to be more cynical because the "he will say anything to get in your pants" message is a lot more prevalent. And so women's reaction is to shun the betas and have more casual relationships. I would say that disproves your argument but given that women are retarded I have to say it actually makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:11 PM
2

Lol, that would mean 25% of all men who said they have had sex were lying in that survey. Nah. Anecdotal, but I'd say about 10% of my male friends (mid 20s) are incels, and more than half of those incels were from Asia. And I studied engineering ffs. I don't know why they feel the need to exaggerate. 20%, if true, is quite a huge number and means inceldom is on the rise, which is his point I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:01 PM
10

Okay, let's say that statistic is correct (sounds a little much, but okay.) 40% is still absurd. The world does not consist of you and your friends. 12.5% of 26 year olds are virgins according to that study. Probably 80% of those are men. So 20% of men at 26 might be virgins. I don't know where you got 40% from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 03:41 PM
2

Conservative is another word for misogyny. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 03:35 PM
1

I'm not anywhere close. What do you think I am, some misogynistic incel? I have very good relationships with many women. They are just conservative. Though even with them, emotions dominate their thought process. It's alien to me. But with liberal women it's even worse due to the outrage culture and victimhood complex. It's fucking toxic and pathetic, and it's effecting more and more women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:54 AM
5

To defend our ideas and positions? Seems like a pretty obvious reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 07:13 PM
0

Well, yeah I'm surprised the Bible conservatives weren't. But why would the rest of us be? Why would middle and lower class men, especially, be? That's normal talk for that group. If anything it makes Trump seem more human. Teenage beauty pageants accuse him of just walking into their clothing rooms to look at their naked bodies Seems pretty normal to me. A thirteen year old sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein accuses Trump of having paid for her services Yeah. No. Proof or gtfo. things he is getting a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 05:09 PM
1

Yeah, once, or a few times. Ending a really short fling before it becomes something more would also be a 'pump and dump'
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 04:21 PM
1

I'm not trolling though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 11:23 AM
2

I guess it's what you value. Imo most men seem to value both equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 09:17 AM
2

Yeah, but that's not what you mean by family line. It's half genetics, it's half name. Genetics are passed on by men and women. The family name is passed on solely by the man. Women go to another man's family.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 09:06 AM
1

Daughters don't even pass on the family line.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 07:29 AM
2

True. Pumped and dumped is when women enter casual relationships in the hope that it will lead to something more, but doesn't. :( So it makes sense to screen out the men who have options. Only the betas will stick around. Which is exactly what you'd want if you are looking for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 07:28 AM
1

Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 12:16 AM
2

Not sure if it's 'fair' or not. It's a double standard, but I'm all for having double standards. 'Egalitarian' feminists should theoretically oppose this double standard, but it's not like they actually believe in sexual egalitarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 12:15 AM
1

Most guys who are only looking for sex will quickly move on. Yeah, but those are the dudes who women want to be 'pumped and dumped' (aka casual sex) by. But I realize most of the women here are in the post-slut phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 11:36 PM
1

Well I find this place pretty gay most of the time but it clearly has a pretty diverse membership, and that makes the discussions interesting. I mean where else do you have incels, 'RP'W, blue pill women, white knights, and TRPers discussing stuff together with relatively lax moderation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 09:39 PM
1

It's just become politically incorrect to say a male preference now. Things haven't changed otherwise. Men who work at a mostly female workplace are probably gay anyway (I'm serious.) Doesn't mean that people perceive female doctors to be more competent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 08:30 AM
1

Women are required to do these things because of other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 11:44 PM
0

Women are your bosses, doctors, police officers, teachers..."most" men have no problems with that. Well I don't really either. By interaction I mainly meant like for friendly chats, or for discussions, or as friends. General recreation and social interaction, not dealing with women in occupations. Personally I'm more likely to want to interact with a female police officer because she's more likely to let me go, but that has nothing to do with my primary point. Women as bosses? Most men prefer ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 08:23 PM
1

'He's mocked … women' Cool. They should be mocked. They're getting too uptight and cunty. I mean, be honest, were you really that outraged when Trump said 'Grab them by the pussy.' Like OMG HOW CAN MEN TALK LIKE THAT?? But seriously, is he a narcissist with thin skin? Yes. Is he better than the other scumbag politicians? Also yes. Not the hero we want but the hero we need. Or however that saying goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 02:50 PM
1

Trump is a boss. Republicans should have kept the house but unfortunately women can vote so...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 01:56 PM
9

Trust me there is little reason for most men to want to interact with women past flirting, relationships, and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 11:09 AM
1

Do you know what not necessarily means? What if they don't eat like shit? Then they don't get fat. And they don't become ugly. I've met women who are very sedentary but they keep a good diet and have decent facial features so they are attractive enough. That's not true for men. Being indoors is terrible for men. Physically and psychologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 06:31 AM
2

They get soft, unhealthy, and weak, not necessarily fat. But that's not AS bad for a woman. Being fat is, but you can be sedentary and not fat. You can't be sedentary and masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 04:02 PM
1

Well, it could. Attractiveness is a large number of things. Hair, face, sure, are obviously part of attractiveness. All I'm sayin is that very few incels are at the point of attractiveness where things are totally hopeless without surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 02:30 PM
6

You'd think with the world becoming more 'crazy', your agency would play a more significant role?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 01:00 PM
5

They may not be desired after they get married and become cucks to their wives, but they were likely desired before. I don't believe women marry men they are not desired to, merely for 'chores' and money. Those things may have a genetic element, but I don't believe it's enough to justify yourself being an incel. I'm sorry. I've met plenty of people who managed to pull themselves out of an incel mindset and be successful with women, and I'm in that category myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 12:02 PM
6

So basically... "Take the Black Pill." No, the PUAs are right. Don't be a pussy. You aren't 'meant' to be an incel. Very few men can point to their genes and say 'that's the main reason I'm an incel' and not be full of shit. The majority of incels just lack masculinity and social skills. Things you can develop to some degree, if you have willpower. Sure, beta men really shouldn't dream of getting hoards of women coming after them, it's not LIKELY going to happen particularly with the collapse of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 10:13 AM
1

Good for you dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 09:53 AM
5

Yeah, because more and more men are buying into feminist bullshit and becoming emasculated. I also think it's sedentary lifestyles. That doesn't matter too much for women, it matters a lot for men. You lose the childish look and personality by going out and doing shit, not by sitting inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 08:05 AM
1

A woman who knows what she's talking about. Wow
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 06:34 PM
1

Why would a man respect a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 05:45 PM
0

Well it changed 10% in 2017... So I wonder what stigma suddenly changed in one year? Or could it be the 40,000 refugees accepted that year.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:52 PM
1

Throughout history isn't really relevant. Since throughout history women had virtually no power or independence. They do now, and they are using that power and independence to rapidly change or destroy our current cultural, racial, and national identities. So yes, that makes them traitorous towards that culture, race, and nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:51 PM
0

Well, they might have good work ethic if they are working to not be deported back to their shithole of a country.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:48 PM
1

Their problem is that it's a shithole with a low population IQ, and no work ethic in their culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:43 PM
0

No it doesn't. I mean, Sweden doesn't keep track of the ethnicity or country of origin of the criminals, but any independent study into the ethnicity of the rapists have found the majority to be foreign born. Now you could say that the organizations doing these studies lean right wing and that's probably true, but it's the only statistics we have. And it fits that the number of reported rapes in Sweden has increased by 24% in the last decade.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:42 PM
1

Promoting gender roles would be good enough. Women could still have freedom, but if most men and many women scoff at women political candidates, they are unlikely to be elected anywhere. Which would be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:35 PM
1

That's just one fucking example. In every single country in the world women overwhelmingly support leftist parties, and women are much more supportive of immigration, multiculturalism, and interacial relationships. They are much less likely to support the nation in wars. This is easily observable. The most extreme parties are also largely populated by women. (DSA, for example)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:32 PM
1

What do you even mean by that. You saw my post history and realized hey, he clearly believes that women have a traitorous character! But I already just fucking said that. I'm saying challenge my view. If you can't refute it you don't have to post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:29 PM
1

Well if your country is not doing well, it's unlikely you will be. For example, feminists in Sweden have welcomed in a ton of refugees and immigrants, and that has skyrocketed their rape rate. Even if you think those figures are exaggerated, immigrants overall, but particularly asylum seekers, take more from the system than they put in. Which means that accepting immigrants leads to a decrease in your overall living standards. As for race and culture, they are tied together. And a large part of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:27 PM
1

Yeah alright. I mean I've seen some low quality trash on this sub, but maybe the standards have gotten higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:21 PM
0

Well yes, it is a pretty strong view. But isn't that the case with all CMVs? That said, if you provide a good argument I'll listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:20 PM
1

No idea what you are talking about friend. This is simple observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:19 PM
1

Great! Thats good to hear. So did you restore my post?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:18 PM
0

I don't think it's great mod policy to base your moderation on how triggered you are, but alright, I've changed my original post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:14 PM
1

Wow I have a female supporter! But it looks like I'm being sexist so my post was removed. Imagine that!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 03:05 PM
1

I just said "I don't mean 'lock them in the kitchen'" And you responded with hysteria. No I don't mean that. I like women having freedom. It's better for men if they do. I just think they should be discouraged (even prevented) from having power and influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:59 PM
0

Uhh, how about Swedish feminist parties supporting open borders. Women very clearly are more likely to support higher rates of immigration, multiculturalism, and mixed race couples. This isn't hard to see. Its really obvious. So can you please stop censoring me. If I'm wrong, let people make arguments against me and I'll debate in good faith. But stop with the censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:56 PM
0

Well, if it's true, that means that some oppression of women is necessary to preserve culture and race, and to prevent the decline of the country. And by oppression, I don't mean 'lock them in the kitchen', but rather to prevent women from getting positions of power and influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:51 PM
1

Wait a sec. Isn't this the sub that literally shits on Indian and Asian men all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:27 PM
1

Jeez.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:25 PM
1

Are you serious? Just talking about the different attitudes towards culture of women of different races.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:24 PM
2

Well, at the base level the average woman has more opportunities than the average man. Less is expected of her, she has similar career opportunities (with the option of not working as well), much more sexual opportunities, and she is treated better by society in general. At the high end its better to be a man, since male social structure is deeply hierarchical, and women's preference is deeply hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 01:59 AM
1

That seems... inaccurate. Across the western world in numerous countries the average seemed to be around 7 or 8. But I don't know, there are always irregularities in these studies. Also, what sets the top 5% apart? I don't know. More bohemian lifestyle?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 09:40 PM
6

Women report less than half the partners that men do. The actual mean is somewhere in the middle of the two. Around 7-11
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 09:17 PM
2

Not gonna lie, this is getting pretty funny. Though I have no idea what this is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 09:34 PM
2

I'm not an incel. lol So your entire reply is just bullshit. Maybe next time don't assume shit and you won't waste 10 minutes of your time writing an entirely pointless post.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 07:43 AM
2

Definitely. Women should get drilled by 50 dudes while pursuing communication degrees. They should then complain about wage gaps until the market bends to give them higher pay. Then they can find some beta to leech off of when they are 30+. Sounds about perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 01:12 AM
-1

They were near grils. Therefore Chads. 6 to 1. Hail Saint Rodger
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 12:31 AM
-1

4 chads and 2 stacies. 6 to 1. Great KD. I rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 12:25 AM
7

Women are fucking retarded. They more than anyone should be able to understand what makes incels so fucking depressed. After all, women fuck for validation. That is more than anything what incels want. But as I said, women are fucking retarded. So they don't understand shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 11:35 PM
1

Women act retarded because men give their stupid behavior a free pass. Well that's never going to happen, men aren't going to stop wanting a woman just because she says stupid shit. But yeah, focusing on this case (the video OP linked) women behave this way towards ugly males. Men aren't very collectivist, attractive males aren't going to stand up for unattractive ones. So yea women will keep getting away with it. But all I'm pointing out is the hypocrisy. It's never going to stop. But the dual …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 01:47 AM
19

This is the super power of women. Low awareness and cognitive dissonance. They can treat short and ugly men with utter disdain while complaining about how men are shallow. They can dress like whores while talking about how men should not objectify them. They can talk about how men need to show emotion, and then mock men like Kavanaugh when they show emotion. In short, women are retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:58 PM
1

Well back then women working in careers weren't likely to climb very high. You were either a housewife, or a secretary or nurse or some other low level service job where you were likely to be paid poorly, harassed and assumed to be loose. Relative to those, being housewife was absolutely more respected. I'm not saying men were like 'wow shes a housewife so impressive!' But being a housewife was the best option a woman had in terms of how respected a role was in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 08:19 PM
0

It was as respected a role as women could have in that society. So in that sense it was promoted and prestigious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 03:39 PM
1

It was the role that 'respectable women should do' instead of now, where its the role that 'respectable women should NOT do.' It was promoted as the ideal outcome, and therefore was a somewhat respected role with some prestige, as much as a woman could get in a patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 03:21 PM
3

It really isn't a respected role any more. I think it was a respected role during the patriarchy. But now.. with the social constructivists in control of our culture, obviously being a SAHM can't be respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 04:28 AM
3

Right, that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 04:01 PM
3

You are actually insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 03:47 PM
2

I'm saying that photos of their tits and asses are far less likely to be part of 'competition with other women without regards to men.' Photos like that are exclusively geared towards gaining male attention, whereas facial features could go either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 03:47 PM
6

It's certainly competition with other women, but male attention is part of that competition. There is a reason why women on Instagram commonly strike poses that accentuate their hips, breasts and asses. If it was completely without regard for men it would mostly about facial features, fashion, being slim etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 03:41 PM
3

They should lose weight anyway, lol Anyway, what do you mean 'mostly women.'
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 03:38 PM
11

This actually makes some sense. One small problem though. 'Toxic masculinity' attracts women. And as long as that remains true, toxic masculinity will stay around. Personally, the happier and sexually successful males I know don't have or promote these toxic ideas and behaviors. They do, they just don't tell you. Why would they?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 02:34 AM
5

So it obviously counts as a mark against you. You are the same height or shorter than 22% of women in the United States. A lot of those girls won't date you, as its quite uncommon for a girl to date a guy shorter than her. But, it's not sufficient to explain being incels for those men. Even girls taller than you might date you if you have other great qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 01:36 AM
2

Tbh no. My penis doesn't really care about her personality. If shes a horrible person, it doesn't really affect sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 10:06 PM
2

Have fun. Socialize. Be fit if you aren't. Learn time management. People can get good grades and be social too. I've seen many college aged betas say they aren't dating, partying and socializing because they are studying. Bitch, you have time for doing all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 09:39 PM
1

Lmao. XD Hard to read tone on the net.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 04:31 PM
1

Are you a woman? Only a woman would read my objective analysis of the situation and think I'm speaking personally. I'm not shy or introverted. I'm saying women lower their standards faster than men do. Stop being so triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 03:07 PM
1

Well, assuming there were a couple of relationships there that lasted a year or a few years, then one can also expect that there was quite a few flings and/or ONSes too. It's not prudes bashing on non-prudes, it's a description of women's sexual strategy. They are willing to enter casual relationships in their late teens to mid 20s (and yes, 15 partners in 8 years indicates plenty of casual relationships) because they select less-safe but more attractive options - men who will probably not stick…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 02:51 PM
1

Those numbers are mostly gathered for women (75% I'd say) between ages 18-26. To have had 15 partners in 8 years indicates a period of sexual disinhibition, which is what the cock carousel refers to. It doesn't mean ONSes every weekend, but short term flings that are far more casual and physical than the types of relationships that women enter in with the betas in their late 20s and 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 02:01 PM
2

I don't think religion is a factor, and the late marriage age shows that people don't really take religion seriously. But the cultural development from religion is a factor, and Ireland's culture has been shaped by it's Catholic roots. I mean, I don't know how much, but I see that pattern in general from your chart. Italy (23%) has lower divorce rates than its neighbors, France (55%) and Switzerland (42%.) Poland (36%) has lower than Hungary (45%) and Czech Republic (53%.) Malta has just 13%. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 01:58 PM
1

It is common. The average person in the US has had 10 partners (Or 8 or 12 depending on the study.). If you narrow that down to irreligious or not particularly religious city folk, then the average is 15-20 (the average in my city is 20+.)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 01:48 PM
3

Because in almost all cases your woman will be fucking a lot more people than you. Also men are naturally possessive. Being a cuck is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 03:05 AM
0

No, but there are certain factors involved that make the cock carousel very common. For one, women are incentivized to, these days. Being prudish used to be seen as a good sign, now being more sexually open is somewhat celebrated (though not too much!) Second, women at a young age can afford to get into risky ONSes and short term flings that they hope will lead to a relationship. They usually don't, and they don't care that much, not at that age. Lastly, you are young, and everyone is attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 01:24 AM
2

It is. It works. Blue Pill advice doesn't work. Blue Pill advice is the REASON people go to the red pill in the first place. I mean, I should have said that in my first comment I guess lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 01:18 AM
1

Go talk to women. Just get out of your shell, that's all. If you are a pushover, be more aggressive. Be more confident, be more of an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/18 01:57 PM
3

Yeah, of course. I mean we are talking about women who aren't paired up and are desperate for partners - obviously not the attractive ones!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/18 05:15 AM
4

Yeah, you keep lowering your standards as you age. But more importantly - women do. Women lower their standards for men far faster than men do. And soon, those beta foreveralone men are paired up with fat divorced single mothers. True love right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/18 10:35 PM
6

There is almost no such thing as forever alone. Almost every man will find someone by 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/18 09:05 PM
1

Depends on the person that I'll be spending the rest of my life with. But in most cases, a lifetime of casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/18 09:03 PM
1

No, but strict enforcement of monogamy was against AF/BB and hypergamistic branch swinging. The current system is exactly what women desire, so it's likely to remain as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/18 02:47 PM
1

That's whats important!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 06:00 PM
3

Do girls come out of the screen and jump on your dick too? Didn't think so. If a woman is initiating sex because she's really horny I'm going to say that she likes sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:58 PM
3

I mean, I’ve got a couple mirrors I can look in if I feel like I need it. That confidence though
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:57 PM
5

Are you incel? I've been with women who definitely enjoy sex. A lot. You can say they don't like it as much as men. And there is definitely usually a greater emotional component to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:26 PM
6

She could be a grad student. Though calling yourself a young woman at 27 is a stretch.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 03:39 PM
2

Pretty much?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 02:02 PM
1

Also, the assertion that men peak at the same time as women is complete garbage. Women peak at 18-23. Men reach their peak in their 20s, but certainly later than women, and also have more potential to stave off aging if they don't get fat or bald.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 02:01 PM
1

That article is retarded. "Science does not support the half + seven rule.' No shit. The half plus seven rule is a rule FOR MEN to know how normal it is to have a relationship with a young woman of a certain age. It's not saying women are most attracted to men 2* (x-7) their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:55 PM
1

They are definitely not. That said, I feel you are misunderstanding the 35 male peak. That's fair because a lot of TRPers misunderstand it too. 35 is when a male has the most potential in the sexual market place. NOT the most potential to have sex with 22 year olds. Don't be confused. That is probably 23-25, but at that place a woman has far more value than a man, and the sexual market place is entirely in her favor. By 35 that situation is reversed. Women are desperate for a man to marry by the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:51 PM
1

I'm kind of TRP lite. There is a lot of shit TRPers say that I disagree with. That said, I do believe that modern lifestyles, sexual disinhibition, and feminism have made AWALT much more common. Not because women weren't AWALT before but that their AWALT-iness wasn't so much on display. It manifests itself most in the 'sexually free', outspoken, liberal woman who says one thing (loudly, as propaganda) and does another. So yah, I just see a lot of AWALT behaviors from women so I 'meet the TRPers'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 03:26 AM
2

Don't have a sister, she'd probably be an AWALT. My mom's a conservative farm woman. My dad was her first and only partner. So she's kind of that unicorn. The awaltiest thing she did was raise me as a beta. But with my dad she's always remained pretty non-awalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:10 AM
2

You know, that's a fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:01 AM
4

Half of them look like gay liberals. The styles might work in San Francisco. Where I live people will think you are homosexual. And a poorly dressed one at that. Some styles look aight though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 08:17 PM
10

Or a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 08:14 PM
30

new account. Named childfree91. Post filled with garbage trash. Yes I'm going to guess this is a troll. To answer your question, it's because men always desire young women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 06:38 PM
2

Well if they fuck you, they are probably interested in you - for fucking. Past that I don't understand why someone would want to get married to someone with these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 03:44 PM
2

Yeah, its misleading as fuck. Did you know only 50% of 10-50 year olds are married? Crazy right
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 03:38 PM
1

I'm assuming for an LTR Red: Divorced, Single mother, daddy issues Green: Chill, religious, doesn't do drugs
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 03:25 PM
1

Well, one problem with the red pill right now is that it's become infested with twats. These people have added shit they WANT TO BELIEVE into 'Red Pill truths', and a lot of that shit is what the blue pill mocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 03:05 PM
1

His numbers aren't too incorrect. But only because so few people from 22-26 are married. Most people are married by 30, still. His point still stands though. People married way earlier before. https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/7b31li/percentage_of_us_women_never_married_by_age_1980/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:53 PM
4

Less condom use, more minorities, homosexuality and bisexuality being more open and encouraged. The latter two aren't PC to say, but probably are a big part of the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:41 PM
1

Beta game is pretty much dead in the west, yeah. There is still a threshold of status and income that most women will desire - few will date below their status - but few women are looking to climb higher through marriage. And why would they? They can meet most of their needs and wants doing an easy job, and few of them want to be homemakers and raise children well now. The fact that women gave up their homemaker roles en masse the first chance they got, despite the fact that their income wouldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:35 PM
1

Well, cucks are. The statistics are statistics. What are you claiming, that men are making it up? MEN, who would be extremely embarrassed to admit this, are making up being beaten up? I mean sure the women might not be hurting them as much. But how does that change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:28 PM
3

It's probably also because most men and boys are desperate for pussy and will put up with all types of shit, whereas women, especially young women, can just walk the fuck away. It's also because men have become cucks, because of deliberate emasculation. Who the fuck lets a woman beat them up, you'd have to have no fucking balls.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:27 PM
1

Time is very short and youth even shorter. Stop taking everything so seriously and have some fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 02:25 PM
4

She's attracted to the gifts the beta gives her, not beta traits. There's a difference. She's not attracted to the nigga. With alphas, she's actually attracted to the man. Anyway, I agree it shouldn't be shamed. Providing income and gifts is all that a beta can bring to the table and that's the only way he can compete with alphas. Unfortunately, beta game is a dead strategy. As you said, the overwhelmingly dominant narrative is about tingles, so beta game now is to manage to get some broad past …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 05:24 PM
2

The average woman is wired like that -> meaning she can't change it. But sure you can find many male-brained women who are the exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 11:34 AM
1

Probably not ideal now that women entering the labor force has saturated the market and driven wages so low that the average middle class or umc family has to have both parents working. But yeah, it was a pretty good idea before.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 11:32 AM
1

But is there really that much pressure to not have an abortion here? There may be a lot of discussion about abortion here, but I don't see much pressure against it, nor many problems with availability. I've actually lived and worked in Japan for a year. Now, obviously as a single man at the time I didn't discuss abortion much there, but from what I know and read, it's slightly harder to get an abortion there, and people aren't super chill with it. It's more expensive, they rarely give abortion p…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 10:09 AM
1

Not if you redefine what masculinity is!/s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 08:39 AM
1

Not to a social constructivist. Gender is a myth anyway, why would behavior be a part of one gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 08:38 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is attractive to young women. I think after a woman has been damaged by toxic masculinity enough, she starts to find other qualities more attractive, or at least stops finding toxic masculine behavior as attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 08:36 AM
1

What problems would be solved? Less single moms? Obviously. There are no examples in the West. But it's intuitively true.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 08:34 AM
6

Abortion is prosecuted here? Every fourth woman has had an abortion in Canada and the US. Where are you living.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 08:33 AM
1

It was in jest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 05:44 AM
1

oh ok
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 12:34 PM
3

Nothing should be free or subsidized. Government making things free creates degeneracy. But as long as we are also paying for single mothers who get knocked up by some chad who they never see again, we might as well also pay for birth control and abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 11:20 AM
1

That's because you are azn. Real talk though, it's mostly old white American and Canadian women who get pissed off about any age gap. Half your age plus seven is like.. a 30 year old dating a 22 year old. Normal? Imo it is. But certainly many would call it creepy these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 08:41 AM
1

Except that's not the case anymore. Half your age plus seven is frowned upon now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 08:07 AM
2

Yeah because MRA and co. are so much more gung ho than feminists. Throughout my life almost all the women I know have complained about other women. It's so common.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 06:58 AM
1

I said that I can't thnk of something that I dislike in men generally. But yes, there are separate things about alpha and beta men that annoy me. Which is what I said. But you can keep being a cheeky twat if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 04:49 AM
1

That's just a rather small group of men. I guess I could separate it between beta and alpha characteristics. In which case I hate beta 'nice guy' behavior, being nice and doing shit for women trying to get laid. And I dislike alpha boasting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 04:10 AM
2

Funny how its all women commenting here lmao. Tbh I can't think of much I dislike of men. There are different behaviors of groups of men I dislike, but can't think of any general thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 03:36 AM
2

I guarantee you that in the 60s, 70s, 80s even maybe 90s, a 23 year old dating a 30 year old wouldn't merit a second look. Finding that weird is a totally modern thing, and it was deliberately constructed by older women. Age gaps of 10+ years might always have been creepy though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 12:51 AM
1

Are you kidding. So a city with a murder rate of 0.4% and a city with a murder rate of 0.1% would be of no difference to you? Because that's the difference (4 times) between Chicago and San Francisco. Or Detroit and Dallas.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 05:06 PM
1

Well, I'm not disputing that women are probably less happy while staying at home. What I'm disputing is that the shift to work oriented life overall doesn't seem to have brought a lot of happiness to women. The current lower levels of happiness of house wives may be due to the lack of acceptance or respect of her job and contribution to society, as well as the lack of funds that it might lead to, due to the overall lower wages now in comparison to 1970. This model has nothing to do with number o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:58 PM
2

I'd say the indignation starts at 5 years age difference and higher, and is particularly bitter when it's with early 20s women or, especially, teens. I've never met a woman who didn't get a little bothered hearing that men find late teen women the most attractive. I don't blame them tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:34 PM
1

And female depression rates have increased over time. Interesting. It certainly had more prestige than it did now. If some job is being encouraged by most of society, it has prestige. On the other hand, if you are being mocked for doing something, it is unlikely to have much prestige. It's not a misconception, it's obvious truth. A woman who has a career is unlikely to find the time to have a child, unless there are massive benefits and provided by her employer if she gets pregnant. In a free ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:30 PM
1

According to latest stats, 44% of Japan's labor force is female. Compared to 46% in Western Europe and the United States. So not very different. It might be less brazenly feminist, but they've still dragged women who would be happy being housewives and raising children to instead do 9 to 5, likely longer in Japan, jobs. I'm not saying women should not work. But I think the more masculine minded feminist women dragged the more feminine women to all work, and being a housewife has lost any prestig…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:03 PM
1

Well, yeah, it's certainly true that we wouldn't be having fertility problems if not for job requirements, feminism, etc. It's not so much the age, though higher age at first birth IS a factor. It means, for example, higher chance of defects - and thus abortion. It means less time until you are unable to have more kids. It means less chance of an 'oops we're pregnant' moment both because of reduced fertility and higher maturity. It means less time to change your mind and have kids. And various o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 01:55 PM
1

Damn, gotta work on that reading accuracy. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 01:06 PM
2

TFW you get triggered by natural biological behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:22 PM
1

I don't think you get it really. I'm in my mid - late 20s. The guys I work with are generally still good looking. I do admit, that youth = attractive, in general. But that said, it's ridiculous to say a guy hits 30 and loses his attractiveness, same as women. Most of the men here are not balding or receding, some are losing some volume. Not a big deal. Wrinkles? Skin aging? Science has shown that affects women more than men. If that was not the case, then SO MANY male celebrities in their 30s wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:07 PM
1

Fwiw the median age of marriage has risen over time but the age gap has been pretty steady at 2.5 years since the forties. You have to go back 100 years to see that gap widen to 4 years. Stats like this mask certain things. The reality is something like the first figure in this study: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9b92/c553be44f0cb70cf498e4c8650c9a1742b9d.pdf Notice that age gaps don't change much. But that's only because more people marry older and when you are in your 30s and 40s, age gaps …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 11:50 AM
1

Depends on the age... I agree that 20 and 30 is odd. 26 and 36 is not, however. 23 and 29 is not 22 and 27 is not 20 and 25 is not. The half your age plus seven rule works pretty good actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 11:40 AM
1

When did I say much older? I said 5 to 10 years older. And yes, it was not uncommon or weird at all. So why the sudden change? My argument is that it's not because women suddenly became free in the last two decades. It's because of deliberate social conditioning by older women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 11:22 AM
1

No, I don't. I have respect for them. But it has nothing to do with attractiveness. If anything it's unattractive, because it is not a feminine thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 10:19 AM
2

No, it's always been like that. The only reason young women married older men was because those were the only men with resources, and since women needed men to survive, they had to do it or they'd starve. The men their own age were poor and had no means to support a wife. Enter the mid to late 20th century, and suddenly women are free to make their own money, go to college, and live outside of their father's household. BAM. Suddenly young women are nearly all dating young men. Except it hasn't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 10:16 AM
2

It's just the wording. TRP is an all-male group, and no one cares about sugarcoating shit. 'Dread' is what it is, it's an apt name for it. I mean they could call it 'be the type of person who your wife/gf won't take for granted, because you could leave her and get someone else.' That won't trigger as many women, but not triggering women isn't the point, getting the point across in a catchy way is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 10:14 AM
3

Yeah... kind of a fair point. I'm not sold on all the MRP advice. But some of it's good. Dread gaming, limiting beta characteristics, being in shape, being assertive etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 09:50 AM
1

That would be true if there wasn't a huge number of women who shame women who date older men and men who date younger women. It has become creepier over our lifetime due to social conditioning. Women didn't just suddenly become free two decades ago, that is ridiculous. Sexual freedom was pretty much equal in the 70s and 80s, if not more. And yeah, a 25 year old woman probably has lower SMV. But SMV declines faster for women than men. A 25 year old dating a 33 year old is fine, even optimal. 7 ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 09:49 AM
5

Reading in a lot of assumptions to what I'm saying. First of all, even in the 60s, 70s, 70s and maybe even 90s, age gaps of 5-10 years were not considered strange, at all. This is a modern invention. And a 25 year old woman would probably not mind a 33 year old man at all. If he's fit and has his hair, his looks don't decline too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 08:26 AM
1

Yeah I understand that you would find that creepy. Men are never going to not desire the attention and sex of young women, but dating or marrying an 18 year old as a 38 year old is ridiculous and is unlikely to work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:59 AM
5

It should always be passive, imo. But if you aren't the type who is capable of passive dread, then you have to internalize that and develop the ability to passive dread. Tbh, just being fitter, more confident, more charismatic, more outgoing, more successful and just less boring is enough to passive dread. I'd say shit like intentionally making your wife think you are cheating is just reprehensible and an example of when TRP goes too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:57 AM
3

Well, it depends on the balance. Depends on the woman. Good sex is one positive thing in your favor. That's all I can say about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 04:57 AM
3

I doubt that, tbh. Great sex may offset your beta characteristics for some time, but it's obviously not enough to sustain a LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:53 AM
16

It's hilarious to read the comments here. Nothing seems to trigger women more than older men with younger women. No wonder they've done their best to condition young women to find it creepy through propaganda and social control.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:50 AM
2

That seems a little excessive. What are the reasons for these requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:46 AM
9

It's creepy because that is the attitude people have been conditioned to have during third wave feminism. It was not remotely creepy for the vast majority of human history. Age gaps of between 5 and 10 years make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:41 AM
1

Well, it's probably not indicative of most men, but probably most of the ones that find TRP. But yeah you have to navigate through a lot of bullshit and bitter twats to get to constructive stuff on TRP these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:40 AM
10

Well, that could be it. It could just be that they tried it with the wrong women. What I've also observed is that women have a tendency to encourage beta traits in their boyfriends and husbands, and the men adopting those traits lead to a decline in sexual interest from the woman. It's paradoxical, but I've seen it happen with many couples and have heard it online too. TRP advocates alpha behaviors to restore sexual interest in relationshps. Dread gaming, for example. I've found that to work qui…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:30 AM
17

That's what many of them have said, though. What's clear to me is that men have been fed a bunch of bullshit by society that leads to excessive beta traits and failure in their relationships. TRP at least points out that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 03:26 AM
32

TRP is full of people who all tried shit like this, and they reject it because it didn't work for them. Then they try the stuff TRP talks about and suddenly their relationships are much better, which reinforces the ideas. That's why they strongly believe what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 02:57 AM
1

Yeah, and all of them have transitioned to late marriages. The countries where women marry the latest have the lowest fertility rates. Not to mention that the risks of defects quadruple by 35. It's not very sustainable. Or healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 01:26 AM
1

Yeah, and Europe is facing a demographic crisis, with several countries in negative growth rates, and most in a labor crisis with inability to pay out pensions due to the old people per productive people ratio. Wish you luck Thanks. It's not a goal of mine though. I'm not going to reject a girl that I like and not marry her just because she's not 5 years younger, or that she's my age or older. I'm just countering your point about what's the best age difference. But unless there's an absolutely h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 01:15 AM
1

And if you can, go for it. Wealthy men will always have the opportunity to marry younger women, and it doesn't seem like there are many negatives to them doing so. Originally I said I'm just going to go with my intuition. That appears to be the right move, since all these studies are so contradictory. Intuitively, I would say that a 40 year old male isn't going to have a great marriage with a 20 year old woman. But a 26 year old with a 34 year old man makes perfect sense to me. She's still young…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 01:01 AM
1

Thanks for the study. Interestingly the original study isn't even discussing age differences. It's about wedding expenses. Still, it stands but.. it's refuted by the study I linked. There is a figure in the study that plots age difference vs divorce rates among 3 cohorts (1961, 1981, 2001 marriages.) It's generally quite steady no matter the age difference, with some slight, rather insignificant, variations. Ultimately, I'd say people should do what they want. Most men will always want to marry …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:48 AM
1

It's a huge part of it. Along with anti-feminism, I'd say it was the two things that TRP was originally about. I said on another post that it's community has degenerated a bit since then, and you will find a lot of nihilism and genuine hatred for women there. It's also become infested with foreigners, incels and MGTOWs which is why I don't post there as much. But I don't really see that among the top contributors, nor the overall TRP teachings. Despite the other crap, PUA, antifeminism and discu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:39 AM
1

What I hope to be true? I'm in my mid 20s, it's entirely irrelevant for me. It's what I think would be true. It certainly makes sense that age differences are more important when you are young than when you are older. Are you really arguing against that point? Anyway, you can wave aside almost any study with the 'correlation is not causation' argument. In this case, and there have been other studies that have shown the same, the correlation is quite strong. Especially since wealth is correlated …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:34 AM
1

not with a clear trend (consistent rise) Fair point. But you didn't address my other point. It depends on the ages too. I'd argue whats more important is age difference to actual age ratio. What kind of men have the chance of attracting a younger partner? Rich, good looking, healthy. That's a cause, not the effect. Read the study. Those things were studied too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 12:09 AM
1

So TRP encourages you to look at women as sexual objects? When someone gives PUA advice, they are going to treat women as a 'sexual object' within the context of that conversation. A PUA person is telling you how to get laid, and is therefore women in such conversations are just objects of your sexual desire. That doesn't necessarily mean that any of those people in that conversation view women as sexual objects all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 11:57 PM
1

No it doesn't. You've got these facts and are parading them around without any context or even a link to the original study. First of all, the 5 year age gap is quite insignificant. 18% difference probably falls near the margin of error for such a study. 10 years, also quite insignificant. Then you have to consider the ages of the two involved. 18 years old girl with a 28 year old man? Probably won't work out. Probably will have tremendously high rates of divorce. However, 28F with 38M? That's p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 11:42 PM
1

Your stats didn't specify the age at marriage and the age difference together. You posted two separate stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 11:24 PM
2

That small number of women who go crazy with fitness, makeup, hair and are attractive on top of it are doing it for a) to bag a top 20% male and b) for competition with other men. Regardless of what you do as a male who's not in the top 20%, you aren't going to make it into that. So there is less point for those ads to target towards men. The sexual market is distorted because it's always been like that due to the different sexual natures of men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:41 PM
1

I'm willing to bet that a man has the lowest risks of being divorced if hes in late 30s marrying a girl in her late 20s or early 30s. High age gaps seem good for marriages - intuitively anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:37 PM
3

That's trash advice. Women should ride the carousel and settle for a beta bux in their late 20s. That's their optimal sexual strategy - quite obviously. It sucks for beta men, but that's why beta men oppressed women's natural sexual behavior for thousands of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:34 PM
1

For me all but the last one is red flag behavior. But none of them except the first 3 are cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:33 PM
3

What if your problem is not getting laid. Will getting laid solve that problem? Have you ever considered the possibility that they are sexually unsuccessful NOT because of their toxicity but because of other aspects of their personality or appearance? Consider the case of: The guy is ugly The guy has massive social anxiety The guy is short The guy has a bad frame The guy has a white knight/nice guy complex The guy feels entitled to women The guy doesn't know how to talk to women well And etc. TR…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:22 PM
3

Your self worth is obviously tied to your sexual life to some degree. A lot of TRPers have the rest of their life in order. They have hobbies, they have a job or are studying at school, they have friends, decent relationship with family. But they can't get girls. So that part of their life is not fulfilling at all, and it leads to bitterness. But better than being a bitter asshole is to learn some PUA, learn how women think and what they want, and go and be successful in that part of your life. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 10:11 PM
14

Would you say that every person who has had casual sex treats the opposite sex as a sexual object? Or is it only when the person can't get casual sex but desires it that you get triggered?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 08:14 AM
17

it's a step towards them solving their feelings of inadequacy. Their problems of not being able to have a healthy sexual life - which, and this might surprise you, is important to being happy. Also, TRP mostly says the problem is with you, not women. 'If you can't get laid, it's your fault, this is what you should change in order to get laid.' What is wrong with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 08:07 AM
12

It's changed a lot since I started reading it. At the start it was mostly about PUA with some anti-feminism thrown in. But the anti-feminism wasn't very academic or well thought out. Now, yeah, its a lot more degenerate. People there seem a lot more hedonistic and perhaps nihilistic. There are also a lot more foreigners, incels, and MGTOWs there. The overall tone is a lot more bitter. So it's changed a lot. But it's anti-feminism and PUA aspects are still good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 05:40 AM
1

Well, I said relatively. And I don't just mean domesticated cats, though they are far more of loners than other domesticated animals (dogs for example.) Most wild cats with the exception of lions hunt independently, not in a pack, and live independently too, with the exception of offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 04:16 AM
1

I don't understand the logic. It's all a competition. Unless the ratios of men to women are different in cities, then it'll be just as difficult. The only factor that matters significantly is that in a town you can get a 'reputation' for being a loser. Whereas in a city no one cares about you at all. Personally, I found it easier to date in a town than a city. I actually knew people and people knew me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 01:35 AM
1

The girl was quite ugly. I don't think good looking, normal, girls ever ask guys out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/18 01:18 AM
1

I kind of rejected a girl who kind of showed interest in me. Only one though. Rejection, three or four times, I guess. I haven't asked many.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/18 11:22 PM
1

I think everyone's gonna have to settle for good enough on some degree. But if she's too far below the best you can do, then I think your relationship will be problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/18 10:14 PM
1

Cats are loners as far as animals go. Women are generally quite community orientated (humans are in general, but women more than men.) Is this the natural state of humanity, as it is for cats, and 'the patriarchy' is just an attempt to impose an unnatural order on things? Far more interesting question. And definitely true imo. Patriarchy was a social construct made by beta men to develop stability and stop the toxic behavior of women and alpha males. It's obviously not seen in nature. But many e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/18 09:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter