TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PercentageForeign766 Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by PercentageForeign766 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yall go on dates just to get sex, when you could just find a girl who's DTF and save ur time and money. Then yall slut Shame women even though these are the types you want. Because no self respecting woman is gonna fuck a man who pays for 1 dinner bit weird You must have had one guy properly cuck you because this is pure derangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 06:26 PM
2

So you go on dates for free Happy meals? Bit weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 04:31 PM
2

You 100% have gonorrhea.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 04:16 PM
3

She's not going to shag you. Oh the horror, that someone making some shitty generalisation gets called out. Keep projecting, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:47 AM
2

And you've got several sexual diseases to prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:45 AM

About the humour I'd expect from a chronically diseased carpet muncher.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:46 PM
3

Goofy ass clapped up junkie.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:32 PM

How bad did your Daddy touch you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:24 PM
5

This is you, btw:
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:10 PM
1

This is you, btw:
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:07 PM
1

“Women often prefer slightly feminine faces.” Weird lie. You get off on making everything a “nuh-uh!” Instead of actually being logical and learning things? And I demonstrated how your methodology is contradicted, or not at all what you're representing. Do you get off on being this obtuse?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:44 PM
1

As I said, the theory is masculine men won’t make as good of parents. You just said apparently women as a whole don't find them attractive. Tone down the schizo posting, lad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:25 PM
0

Great observation, Sherlock.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:16 PM
4

You're gloating about wanting to fuck a robot. What's there to cope about? You most likely already shag body pillows, so you're just a loser. Have fun being one, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:59 PM
2

In other words, women may prefer masculine men generally Actual quote from your first source, lmao. You do realize that your 2nd source isn't referencing just makeup, right? Items like skin cream or sunscreen are included.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:57 PM
2

Those looking for one night stands, maybe. Not a general rule, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:31 PM
13

The sex robot advocacy is as cringe as the femcels saying they'd rather live with a bear. Actual brainrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:31 PM
2

Since men and women are not coming together because they need to, we are increasingly seeing men and women come together only because they want to Isn't that better as it's a much clearer choice being made? And no, I wouldn't want to date a sex robot and if you do, then you're a weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:30 PM
2

Even if one party is pulling more "legwork" than the other, I don't understand how one still can't view the relationship as a 50/50. It shouldn't be viewed as dependency, but rather selflessness which is what makes the relationship work.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:27 PM
2

I'd like to think that both men and women can take the lead in an aspect of a relationship and still see each other as 50/50. Being a slouch means you're not contributing, and being overzealous can be to domineering (depending on the circumstance). I don't agree that the majority of men are unattractive to women, but paying for dates usually is a token of how one feels. If you are attracted to her, why not pay for a date? It's a kind gesture that indirectly tells her how you feel. I always see p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:25 PM
6

Your preference is a minority prefence. There's nothing wrong with it, but I don't know why you're pretending it's some general rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:19 PM
2

Except any kind of social study has shown women tend to be more attracted to conventionally masculine men. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/72960/1/Docherty_etal_EHB_2020_Do_more_attractive_women_show_stronger_preferences.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:18 PM
1

Being real here, either you're projecting some twisted fantasy whilst fingering yourself, or you actually did cheat on a dude and gloating about it which means you 100% munch on diseased carpet to compensate over getting fingered by your Father. Either way, your life's grim and just not worth living, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:14 PM
4

Lmao, you're actually using the "live and let live" argument for prostitution as if there aren't any problems besides their ethics in practice, you utter baboon.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:35 AM
7

Are you playing dumb or what, big boy? You're saying your framework is better than hers, yet bitch about her framework with some corny-ass insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:29 AM
7

"Fraud or misrepresentation" are indicators along with more blatant examples like kidnapping or coercion. So both. A pornstar getting "hunted" by a group of white dudes doesn't count, so don't worry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:17 AM
5

Society has values but one of those values is that your sky daddy doesnt matter to anyone except you. Probably the dorkiest reply yet. Have you realized that trying to impose your framework onto him as the exact same thing you're crying your eyes out about the other user doing? *She didn't even say anything about God, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:45 PM
5

You’re essentially going to pay for sex and relationships no matter what you do, it is never for free What is this take? Relationships in reality aren't akin to cringey-ass Bioware games where being a helping hand/giving money guarantees you sex. you’re paying with how you socialize, how you dress, what you drive, if you have a house of your own, etc. How you socialize isn't dependent on your expenditure or any monetary value, it's all down to how you are as a person. There's room to be introver…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:42 PM
32

Ha. Citing German as some kumbaya union of prostitutes isn't actually an accurate narrative: https://business.time.com/2013/06/18/germany-has-become-the-cut-rate-prostitution-capital-of-the-world/ https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/06/12/does-legalized-prostitution-increase-human-trafficking/ "Countries with legalized prostitution are associated with higher human trafficking inflows than countries where prostitution is prohibited. The scale effect of legalizing prostitution, i.e. expansion o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:28 PM
6

there's a bit more credibility to the theory that a larger percentage of the male population is bisexual if not gay than our society would really find comfortable. "Theories" concocted by r/ MensLib and r/ TwoXChromosomes that mainly boil down to projection and porn brainrot. As of right now, the difference between bisexual women and men is negligible, so this thinking that "there's so many closeted bisexual men" doesn't make any sense. It's the same brainrotted thinking that perpetuates the ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 01:20 PM
2

My best female friend is gay and super femme and wildly attractive. Dutch, so... all the conventional model good looks *Me when I lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 01:17 PM
4

Yeah, wtf was that shit about, lmao?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 06:29 PM
1

Because your example was, ironically, so far removed from your original point of people using "pop science" to push forward legislation about women supposedly being dumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 05:39 PM
2

It's not a scientific report, it's a self-report, lmao. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 12:16 AM
1

If we removed the percentage of lesbians experiencing IPV that was perpetrated by men, the number (43.8%) would drop. That figure includes only male perpetrators, only female perpetrators, and instances of women and male perpetrators. Why does every smackhead try and twist the article like this? Over 2/3 of reported abuse comes from "intimate partners". Unless gay women are pairing off with opposite sexes on a regular basis, you're just pulling shit from your smelly ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 12:15 AM
1

All this "female brain misunderstanding" whinefest is about abortion, lmao? You know? A topic that is more of an ethical dispute more than anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 08:34 PM
1

Why do you compare a TikTok meme to a scientific paper, as if these are equivalent in heft and authority? Because I thought you were getting worked up over the same dumb people I ignore. Can you name one example in the first-world were someone has passed scientifically ill-informed legislation over "pop science"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:39 PM
1

The she doesn't know what she's talking about. Dumbass feminists work circles around that CDC report but can't find any logical copout.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:19 PM
1

I’ve been debunking the misinterpretation of CDC data/lesbians are more violent myth for years and it never stops popping up. Literally isn't a myth, though so yeah, I can assume your "debunking" hasn't worked because you're operating from a dumb position. The 43.8% of DV to lesbian women, and saying that they could have been with men, is a bit of a copout when the stats for men were 35% DV against hetero women, and even lower for gay and bisexual men. The stats are incomplete, but you can make …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:14 PM
2

Why do you believe it is even possibly correct that women’s brains are “inferior”, when inferiority is a moral, opinion-based stance? I don't... but sometimes teaching a general public to understand nuance in a complex, statistics based scientific field is not possible when the alternative understanding is easy, cheap, and feels good. Are you just finding out that people take shortcuts in intellectual laziness? I said it makes me nervous, just as it makes you nervous that people having thoughts …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:06 PM
1

Our findings suggest that the neuroanatomical signature of transgenderism is related to brain areas processing the perception of self and body ownership There's no marker that has been found that is in conjunction with the supposed differences of brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:58 PM
1

Why would it back up your point considering tras don't believe you need dysphoria to be trans?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:50 PM
0

That article even mentions that they did find a sex-non-typical characteristics in trans brains in the area dealing with self perception... which makes sense and contradicts your "the trans brain is a myth" declaration. That's actually not what it says. Secondly, it doesn't mention the topic of the previous comment as it is a larger analysis of female and male brains. You're trying to find gotchas in something that doesn't back you up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:49 PM
-1

Given up that easily, lmao. You're pulling out every term from the redditoid bingo card, aren't you? What's next? "You're projecting, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 10:46 PM
-2

You're talking in circles because you're insecure in your beliefs, lmao. If you can't counteract something so easy and think that supposed bad actors wouldn't have been anyway, then I don't know what to tell you. You clearly want some kind of narrative to be censored or not conducted, then that's literally on your intellectual failings. You're a political activist with that rationale, not a objective or impartial analyst. Like tras who railroad false narratives about puberty blockers or detrans …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 10:42 PM
2

Lmao. Such a nonce take. You're the one putting forth the notion that people who apparently act in bad faith, suddenly won't when facts agree with their destination of thought. Actual negative IQ take.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 09:09 PM
0

Keep working yourself up, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:52 PM
3

Except, no, it's entirely disputing the "trans brain" claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:51 PM
1

Not my fault its contradictory. Literally isn't and your poor comprehension is the only issue here, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:45 PM
1

So you're just going to keep citing a part and not the follow up sentence where I cited. I like your play, kid. GG.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:41 PM
2

Lol, what? "The findings of Hassett and colleagues do not directly address the issue of mechanism, but the seminal work of Berenbaum and Hines (1992) revealed that girls who have Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) and have been exposed to high prenatal levels of adrenal androgen show a strong preference for male-type toys over female-type toy" That is just showcasing tomboys having a preference for toys targeted towards boys. Plus, your claim is countered in the very next sentence, lmao: , how…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:21 PM
7

No, because he cited your comment and that's what I disagreed with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:01 PM
5

You do realize there are neurological factors for why girls and boys act the way they do? Gender roles may be social constructs, but they're stereotypes for a reason:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755553/#\_\_ffn\_sectitle
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:01 PM
4

Research like this always makes me nervous not because science is bad, but because lay people like to use pop-science translations of studies they don’t understand to justify their awful biases. This train of thought never makes sense to me. If they're misinterpreting the information, then that's on them and you should be armed to deal with that misinformation should it come up (if they're indeed wrong). It's this type of train of thought that lays the groundwork for censorship or just plain ign…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:54 PM
15

It's actually sexuality that has a neurological root: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-17352-8 The "Trans brain" myth is just that: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763421000804
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:51 PM
2

Statistically men tend to be more likely to do those things than women In general, or in the context of a relationship? Because one of those is true and the other isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 07:01 PM
1

I've lost track of the age gap discourse, because whilst it's one thing to find an age gap relationship gross and disgusting (think of the most bog-standard example), it's got to the point where sexual maturity and experience are tossed aside as well as tiny age gaps now being grouped in with large age gaps. Inherent power imbalances come down to more than just age. Whilst I agree that considerable age gaps and people who exclusively date younger is somewhat nefarious, I do think your point here…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 07:00 PM
1

Sexual maturity and age you started developing feelings are the main factors for determining if it's creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 06:57 PM
20

The most common type of IPV reported by men was psychological (35%), followed by physical (17%) and then sexual (2%). Important note. Data from 2018 indicated that 48% of gay men and 66% of bisexual men had been psychologically, physically or sexually abused by an intimate partner at least once since the age of 15 (Jaffray 2021). Gay and bisexual men are much more likely to have experienced physical or sexual assault by an intimate partner than heterosexual men (31% vs. 17%), and more likely to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/24 10:51 AM
12

The article does not identify that there is a distinction between talking and socializing, which is probably the crux of the article.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 06:15 PM
2

That scenario deals with pressure from outside parties rather than one person's (at worst) nefarious sexual gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:02 PM
4

I'VE JUST EXPLAINED HOW THERE IS NO DEFAULT DURING THE 6-8 WEEK PERIOD.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 06:01 PM
3

I've lost track of the age gap discourse, because whilst it's one thing to find an age gap relationship gross and disgusting (think of the most bog-standard example), it's got to the point where sexual maturity and experience are tossed aside as well as tiny age gaps now being grouped in with large age gaps. Inherent power imbalances come down to more than just age. Whilst I agree that considerable age gaps are off-putting, the equivocation to joining the military is incorrect because the milita…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:52 PM
1

Most of the time younger women do not choose older men, as data show. Do you mean that data shows women date men within their own age, or don't initiate interest to older men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:46 PM
3

I hope for your sake that you're invoking fake credentials, because if you're a biologist, then that's really embarrassing. The primordial gonad remains in a bipotential state, neither male nor female. It has no female cells (follicle cells or theca cells), so it's not female. The situation is more complex. There are 3 kinds of genes in the developing embryo: Genes that are neutral, genes that determine sex such as SRY, genes that cause the gonadal ridge to differentiate and become male or femal…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 05:39 PM
0

They're given a pass because they're a minority, not due to thinking their "men-lite". By doing that, it keeps the misandry based on the predominant group, which is all that feminism caters to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 05:33 PM
2

I mean technically, every man is trans, it's just a matter of when you transition. What? Embryos have the genetic info to determine whether it’s xy or xx. Not all embryos are female, and they start indistinguishable during the first weeks in the womb. Gonads in the presence of XY chromosomes and SRY genes develop the embryo into a boy. It's not a girl by default. *****Response here because this subreddit isn't letting my comment through: u/dash-dot-dash-stop I hope for your sake that you're pull…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 09:28 AM
-2

And while all trans people are valid Is that a universal belief that applies to self-iders, and tumblr brainrot like "xenogenders"? Because I think there's a pretty clear line between that and someone who is thoroughly diagnosed with a neurological disorder that doesn't compute with the sexual organs one possesses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 09:22 AM
4

but the queer movement's dislike of men can extend to trans men too But it doesn't. Unless you can point to an example, I always see feminism give an exception to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 09:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter