TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PerfectHair Archive

View 0 posts and 402 comments by PerfectHair on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

He fucking murdered a man.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:33 PM
6

I must have dreamed all of this constant media coverage about how men are inherently awful, then.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:33 AM
1

No she's just winding you up.
/r/PussyPass09/11/15 04:17 PM
2

Whatever it is, it invariably involves the jews.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:22 PM
6

The excuse is "oh we're actually mocking advertising." Which is bollocks. 'Cause the hashtag is literally about masculinity.
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 06:33 PM
27

Sorry, what's that about masculinity being fragile again?
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 02:35 PM
0

Psst. This site is satirical.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:42 PM
1

Where does it say that?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:35 AM
-10

Oh I guess that makes police brutality acceptable then.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 05:46 PM
7

A piercing heals. Foreskin can't be regrown.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:19 PM
14

Okay, but it's not about you. It's about the fact that people are cutting parts off of babies.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:17 PM
2

Support has two meanings; active and passive.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:14 PM
3

Would transport people legitimately be F-22 Raptorkin?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:10 PM
1

pulling out a gun allows me to leave easily In the back of a police car.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:50 PM
1

What's wrong with pillow forts?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:46 PM
1

That's the heading for that section of the episode. The episode would most likely have been "You're a violent cheat but I hope the baby's mine" indicating that, as much as he hates his ex, he wants to be there for the kid, which frankly I respect.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:34 PM
4

As much as I hate the Jeremy Kyle show, I will forever give him props for this moment.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:32 PM
2

Hi, I'm LGBT. I don't want you to speak for me.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:28 PM
4

Baby steps.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:09 PM
2

It's an archive, that's why the video doesn't load.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:13 PM
29

As much as I dislike the Jeremy Kyle show for it's various bear-baiting antics, I respect him greatly for doing this.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:13 PM
3

Huh. I never thought of it that way. X-Post to KiA?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:43 AM
7

Feminism is egalitarian. The MRM is egalitarian. Therefore Feminism is the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:21 PM
-2

Not true. Streaking is a storied tradition, regardless of gender.
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 05:10 PM
13

Why are the people in that thread so intent on pushing the line that "this is between your mum and dad and he shouldn't have involved you." OP is seventeen and has every right to know if there is something that is going to immediately effect his future, and his dad going to jail is definitely one of those things. Not only that, but he sure as shit has a right to know why. Why should his dad hide it? OP, if you're still here, I'm sorry you're going through this. I hope it turns out alright.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 11:50 AM
2

It's not that their fighting for my rights, it's that they're fighting against the rights of others. I'm not doing that.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 10:33 AM
2

So, you'd rather tolerate rights violations instead? Because those are your options. No they are not. There is also the option of 'be civil and fight for your rights.' At the VERY least.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:45 PM
2

However, why would its tone stop you from voting for them? Why does tone play a factor in your vote? Yes. I don't tolerate hostility toward anyone.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:50 PM
2

Now I ain't sayin' she a golddigger
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:11 AM
4

What? No. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:11 AM
2

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/013/604/thisisbait.png
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:08 PM
3

Someone should tell that woman in the other thread that lied to her husband about being a virgin.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:41 AM
3

Celebrinado... Isn't that the guy that's been sending repeated death threats to Sarkeesian over Twitter? Like constantly?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:00 AM
0

If these videos have taught us anything, they also require: Be white That's part of "be attractive" m8 u best b avin a giggl
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:14 PM
3

Well, at the moment, the only thing stopping you is you, but a lot of dresses are cut for women, and will look misshapen on a man.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:59 PM
3

This is sexist to both genders simultaneously. Well done, OP. Well fucking done.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:05 PM
1

I saw that image before, the one on the left that is. My first thoughts were "for people who constantly screech about a need for diversity, that room is enormously white and male."
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:55 AM
1

I'm a man, and I need the MRM. I need it because boys are taught not to show emotion, not because it makes them girly, but because they have to be big boys. Big boys have to look after people. You don't get to have your time. Your time is spent on others. I need the MRM because I feel like a burden to others when I take time to deal with my own issues instead of listening to theirs for once.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:42 PM
3

Nothing. The MRM, as it stands at the moment, does very little, and it needs to do more.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:51 AM
1

Yeah, the enemies of the plutocracy lobbying the servants of the plutocracy, that would work. You can only affect the outcome of the game if you play it.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:50 AM
4

We have the threat, which we can condemn, and should be. We investigate after.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:01 PM
14

Damn right. This is not my MRM.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:39 PM
7

You believe, but have no evidence.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:38 PM
2

fuckn top kek m8
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:08 PM
5

for the same reason I wouldnt let my boy wear a push-up bra or fish net stockings or a g-string. A reason you've not yet articulated. Edit: Also, when "your boy" is old enough to decide he wants to do these things beyond being a kid, you won't be able to make that decision for him. no, a persons worth is determined by many things. But some people seem to think that we should stop valuing certain things. For a long time we've had feminists implying it is wrong to be a house wife. Now we have MRAs…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:00 AM
13

I get rather annoyed at the idea that being anti-SJW's is being anti-social justice. The two aren't a package deal. SJW's are the most toxic, vile, unlikeable people I've ever had the misfortune to come across in my entire life. Does that mean that I instantly think that there should be some sort of unequal treatment under the law? Of course not.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:12 AM
3

The idea that it is important that boys be able to wear pink tutus Why shouldn't they, if they want to? and we should not hold masculine traits in high regard when some men cant live up to them. Bollocks. As one of these boogeyman "anti-masculine" MRA's, this is utter bollocks. Masculinity is equally as valuable as femninity, but a person's worth is not defined by how masculine or feminine they are. Men and women should work together as a team using their own strengths (often biological) to prog…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:09 AM
2

I believe that it should be outlawed on children as it's primarily a cosmetic practice that serves no medical purpose. Anyone who elects to get it as an adult should be able to.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:31 AM
1

Progressivism 90 Socialism 81.25 Tenderness 56.25 Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general. Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist. To round out …
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:13 PM
1

Well I would just ask them how they would feel about men running feminism and in charge of feminist issues. If they say they wouldn't like it, well, that's why we have the MRM.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:17 PM
3

UKIP will do anything to get more votes. I agree with a default presumption of shared custody, but will not support UKIP, no matter what. They're a bunch of cunts.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:28 PM
3

It's a joke.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 08:35 AM
7

Can't wait for the game to come out. Congratulations Afterlife Empire!
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:24 PM
9

You'd rather be told you're a misogynist than have someone else make a fun game? What TFYC are doing is the antithesis of what Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn rant about.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:24 PM
0

Not sure I like the sound of that.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:27 PM
4

So where are the funds going? I don't wanna pay just to keep a website online. I want something concrete.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:57 PM
1

Based nicemod.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:09 PM
1

Other way around. Sex is genitals, gender is mental.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:08 PM
1

I'd've just said "If you know any female VR tech geniuses, send them my way, 'cause we'll take anything."
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:46 AM
1

Get out.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:10 PM
1

Anyone got a YouTube mirror? MSNBC's player is shit.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 12:56 PM
1

So you don't actually have any response to Worshack then. They could do with you over at SRS.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 12:45 PM
3

No, it's been posted to /r/videos before. And hit /r/all before.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:46 PM
14

It's been on the front page several times.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:41 PM
3

I always liked this one: It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. It's attributed to Aristotle, but that's disputed.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:38 PM
2

First thing, I think you need to seek Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, because it sounds like you have OCD of some sort and that won't go away on it's own. Find a therapist who can help you work past it. Second, you need to admit this to your wife. Let her know that if the house is untidy you get anxious and when she shouts at you it adds to your anxiety levels. A lot of the replies here seem to be saying things about you and your relationship, but very few seem to be offering advice beyond "divor…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:51 AM
1

Oh, and just to clarify, it's not just Pop-feminism that's been saying and doing these things, it's organisations like NOW, who opposed shared parenting bills, or Refuge UK, who refuse abused men access to domestic violence shelters. They are, by and large, run by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:35 PM
1

Anyone who calls themselves a feminist is to be taken at face value. The term is so nebulous that it can mean a lot of things. So those people you see wearing Male Tears T-Shirts or with Misandry tattoos or who tweet #KillAllMen, all in the name of feminism, are feminists whether you like it or not, and they are the loudest voices of your movement. Now, on the other hand, the MRM gets people like War Machine and Elliot Rodger dumped on them, despite neither of them having any connection to the M…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:34 PM
3

You must be new here. Feminists aren't our biggest fans and have, in some cases, actively worked against men's issues.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:14 PM
8

Just gonna leave a little shoutout to /r/KotakuInAction right here. They're doin' coverage of indie sites that are avoiding SJ bullshit in their articles. A few good ones, and a few looking for contributors. Go for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:01 PM
12

Oh, wait, is it because people who care about nudes are more likely to want female nudes? Nah, couldn't be.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:01 PM
1

Certainly not if want to enter glorious nation of Arstotzka!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:51 PM
1

Poor girl.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:59 PM
2

Jesus that's heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:26 AM
9

Probably because they believe society and economics to be separate entities.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:44 PM
2

Perhaps make a new post, with the Action Op. Flair, to get people to report it?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:41 PM
1

Perhaps we need to set something up to cover the Male angles of stories like these? 'Cause don't get me wrong, it was largely racial, but I doubt this would have happened had it been a black woman.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:02 PM
7

If you sincerely believe Elliot Rodger was a Feminist False Flag, you're a moron.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:01 PM
2

This is the question that needs to be asked more frequently.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:44 AM
7

It doesn't matter in the least who she sleeps with or why. Explicitly, yes, it doesn't matter. The results of said relationships do matter. No one cares about her having sex with people, it's who she had sex with and the results of it. The point is that it affected journalism to make people money, and it's becoming clearer that this sort of thing is accepted. To paraphrase a video by someone whose name currently escapes me, "It's like Nixon saying to Woodward and Bernstein 'I'll blow you if you …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:44 PM
10

Actually it's got wider repercussions than that. The theory is that she got to the point she is at today by sleeping with enough journalists and indie developers that now won't have a bad word said about her. She exploited the system for personal gain.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:54 PM
5

Woo! TiA got a shoutout!
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 09:55 PM
5

I Asked Men’s Right’s Advocates About Black Men’s Issues And when they tried to make it about Black Men's Issues I got really annoyed and wrote this blogpost.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:49 PM
6

Ahh, Amanda Marcotte. Wouldn't piss on her if she were on fire.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:15 PM
2

What, the link to a two-week old comment in a thread on a sub with less than 3k subscribers? Somehow I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:50 PM
2

wat That's not even vaguely from the front page.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 12:03 PM
2

http://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2chcvv/what_privileges_do_men_that_women_do_not_a/cjgg01f
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:44 AM
2

Can we add Utilities to that, too? Seriously. Fuck EDF.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:46 PM
3

This isn't really a major issue. /u/dainty_flower has given the best response of the thread here. Failing that, simply ask her, in a non-accusatory way, why she said that. Just say something like "Hey, I overheard you say something in the cafeteria. Can I ask why you think I'm weird?" The best advice? Don't overreact.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:56 PM
5

Thank you for actually giving a practical, workable, non-nuclear option for dealing with this.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:55 PM
1

Jenkem. Not even once.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 10:41 AM
1

Considering that this came from Vice, it's actually pretty balanced and fair. It's kinda shocking. 'Grats to the Badgers, though.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:23 AM
3

eBay gives advantages to women that work for them simply for being female Doesn't actually say that in the article. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:40 AM
1

Anita Sarkeesian has received numerous threats for criticizing video games' depiction of women. She has never advocated censorship. Anita Sarkeesian got threats for for kicking a nest of angry bees. They used her gender as a focal point because it was different than theirs. This doesn't necessarily mean that they hate women, any more than saying "oh you're just a man" means someone hates men. People were, and still are, angry at the fact that she manipulated people into giving her money and fame…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:18 PM
1

Never read it put like that. I love it.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:14 PM
2

Member of Parliament. They're the equivalent of a Congressman.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:00 PM
2

I highly doubt the gay fascists would ever pick up their toys and go home if things didn't go their way. It is more so they would try to destroy society out of spite. wat Gay people want to destroy society out of spite?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 03:30 PM
2

The contrast between HuffPo UK and HuffPo US is startling.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:10 PM
6

Kinda defeats the point of making the assignment a survey if you answer it yourself a bunch of times.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:16 AM
0

CCTV cameras every centimeter or so Owned by the people who own the building. i.e. Privately owned. Useless National Health Service that works in theory and abysmally fails in practice Ahem.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:09 AM
0

No she wasn't! If she posted tits and vag she ceased to be anonymous. She ceased to be one of us and became another girl clamoring for attention. [...] She got what she deserved. Generally I'm in favour of the "Tits or GTFO" explanation, but no, she did not deserve to be bullied. Ignored and laughed at perhaps, but no one deserves bullying.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:05 PM
7

Well for a start there's this focus on the tiny percentage of men in power, versus the vast amount of men who are not and who are disadvantaged due to their maleness. For example, the homeless population is 44% men. People often say that men aren't targeted for their gender, and thus aren't victims of sexism, but I would argue that men are neglected due to their gender, which is another form of victimisation, if only a less direct one. It's been stated in this thread already, but there's an empa…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:43 AM
3

I agree with /u/SRSLovesGawker, this group sounds like a pretty interesting basis for a thesis. Edit: Though there is now a danger that, if you were to reveal yourself, the whole section of rabid, insane, man-hating feminism, that does exist, would be written off as a bunch of manufactured troll accounts, as happened with the 4Chan/Tumblr Raid.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:26 AM
3

He reminds me somewhat of a male, British version of Karen.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:38 PM
1

You need to make that an np. link.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:29 PM
1

I'ma repost my comment from /r/sjsucks I'm sure some might read this data as reassuring. However, since one in five women will be sexually assaulted during their time at college, it's actually deeply worrying: as Emily Shire argues at the Daily Beast, it is "statistically impossible for a university not to have suffered any incidences of forcible sexual offenses on campus." "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:45 AM
3

/r/MaleSupportNetwork might be a good place for you to post.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:52 AM
6

Usually when I see "banned from [feminist subreddit of the day]" posts I say to just leave them alone, but this one was actually talking about the MRM, so I think it's pretty fair to have members of the MRM comment on it.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:08 AM
3

Probably not, and I agree, they should, but the judge also denied the request to put either man on the birth certificates.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:00 AM
5

Yeah, it's not like anyone could disagree with you or anything, is it?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:29 PM
1

You're one of the better FeMRADebatesers. :3
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:28 PM
6

Pussy is the diminuitive of pusillanimous.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:42 AM
2

You don't actually seem to be saying anything.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:39 PM
2

I don't need the MRM to try to fight for sex workers' rights or the rights of anyone else because other groups are already doing that. Okay, well.... we'll continue not doing that, I guess? Not really sure what you're accusing us of, here. I mean it's the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:41 AM
2

And so they change the whole rules of the site just to get this subreddit in trouble?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:09 PM
8

Because you're implying intent with no proof. The world is not out to get you.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:43 PM
7

Yes, but do you honestly believe that the reddit admins made this change specifically to target anti-feminist subs?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:06 PM
16

That's pretty paranoid.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:59 PM
5

We need to get Alex Jones in here.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:51 PM
16

Hahaha oh my god that is veering into actual conspiracy theory territory.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:33 PM
2

Because you have no alternative frame of reference. There's nothing wrong with how you feel about your own dick, ergo it's not a big deal for anyone else!
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:24 PM
3

Which African culture?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:59 AM
4

Put simply it's a cosmetic medical procedure being performed on a child. For the same reason you wouldn't tattoo a baby, you shouldn't cut bits of their anatomy off, no matter how "useless" you may deem them.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:53 AM
2

gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:50 AM
1

This was started by Pol. Hell it's even in the screenshot. Tasha /pol/right
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:53 PM
1

Funny how those over at AMR say the same with the targets swapped. If you've got a problem, take it up in /r/FeMRAMeta
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:01 AM
4

Or you could just follow the rules.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:45 AM
3

So, you're saying we should go full Nazi?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:50 AM
2

Are you new to Reddit, by any chance? Also I'd like to point you towards /r/FeMRADebates
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:48 AM
17

Was this drawn in MS Paint?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:40 AM
6

Nice to have you here, Katy. Thanks for the interest!
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:38 PM
1

I'll just point out that menstrual blood is not just blood.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 10:07 AM
1

Maybe, but they're not dedicated to mocking MR.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:40 AM
2

AMR is one, and the other I don't know of.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:54 PM
4

It involves two men! It is twice the issue! Joking aside, gay men get shat on a lot. Like, a lot a lot. I mean I've seen people seriously argue that gay men are only gay not because they're attracted to men, but because they're deeply misogynistic. Allowing gay marriage would be a big step towards helping prove to the general public that men can be caregivers and aren't all hulking brutes.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:24 PM
1

I'ma nudge you in the direction of /r/FeMRADebates and encourage you to grab as many people as you can from the feminist subreddits who isn't aware that they discourage MRA's from participating.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:57 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXdM8fkup4Q
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:19 PM
1

Totes fair, 'cause cishet white men are the oppressor.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:40 PM
2

Shhh, you'll be branded a Cissexist by the tumblrites!
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:16 AM
5

You're so nice. That doesn't happen much around here. Also, Catherine the Great was pretty cool.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:06 AM
8

Well, he is a Frenchman. So, there is that.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:49 AM
7

... What?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:15 PM
7

So what? Are you just gonna stand there and point out that it's men's own fault, or are you actually going to help?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:15 PM
1

Condemn it, yes. Actively tackle it, no. It's beyond the remit of Men's Rights. I agree that it's a fucking terrible thing, but we don't want to lose focus. That said, one of the MRM's goals is a gender-neutral definition of rape, so that would actually be beneficial to female-on-female rape. Also, we're not going to stop anyone who does want to tackle it. It's just not our business to do so.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:17 AM
3

Seconding this. When AMR aren't over there and dicking up threads, it's a good sub.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:12 AM
11

RAINN disagrees.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:08 AM
2

... How?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:23 PM
4

First one was dumb no matter what the gender. Second one, that girl is not unattractive. I don't really see the point they were trying to make. Third one, have these people never seen a Diet Coke advert? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuHV4gwSXn4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdrE1VMxzoE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Sre-wpGHE
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:54 PM
0

I'm not trying to make feminists sympathetic. I worded my comment wrongly. I meant "them" as in "the undecided."
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:26 PM
-1

Did it really take people this long to figure out?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:18 PM
1

Yes, but behaving this way doesn't exactly make them sympathetic to MRA's.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:18 PM
-1

Yeah, it is. What's your point.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:17 PM
1

Credibility of both parties go down due to the fact that OP was being hostile and standoffish, i.e. a dick. Just to preempt any statements about 'seeing the facts/truth/etc. over the tone', remember that the same thing can be said by feminists, and routinely is, under 'tone policing.' Tone is important.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:17 PM
2

Posted in a space for people who already oppose them. Almost literally preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:10 PM
2

And if you're in their space shout at them, then they are your target audience, no matter how much you want to pretend you're talking to the undecided people, you're doing it in entirely the wrong place.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:03 PM
-1

I didn't point it out because no one thinks that's an acceptable response. Pointing it out is pointless.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:57 PM
1

Wading in guns blazing when it's been made clear we're not welcome is really fucking stupid, yes.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:55 PM
-3

Not to them you can't. They just see you as a crazy outsider. And if you're in their space shout at them, then they are your target audience, no matter how much you want to pretend you're talking to the undecided people, you're doing it in entirely the wrong place.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:55 PM
-1

Well they can't if people keep doing stupid shit like this.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:51 PM
3

And you don't get people out of cults by going into Flag Land Base and shouting at the adherents.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:36 PM
-7

Well thanks for the non-sequitur, but what does that have to do with what I said?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:05 PM
-1

The title of the post indicates he was in /r/feminisms talking about Mens Rights. That is not the place to discuss it. They have repeatedly made that much clear.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:05 PM
-3

Where did I say that made them look good?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:38 PM
-4

Where did I say that the violent murder fantasy was an appropriate response?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:37 PM
3

He deliberately went into /r/feminism to bash feminists. That's the equivalent of wearing Bloods colours in Crips territory.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:37 PM
3

Ideological differences don't give you the right to be a dick to people. Make no mistake, that's all this is. They may be feminists, and feminism may have contributed to shitty situations and gendered laws, but did these individuals? Did anyone in /r/feminism, /r/feminisms, /r/TwoXChromosomes, etc. contribute? Does marching in there all angry and shouty achieve anything except making this subreddit, and the cause of Mens Rights in general, look like it's full of toddlers throwing tantrums?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:57 PM
8

Stop being a bitch and grow some balls kid. Did you just tell me to man up? Pretty sexist, bro.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:50 PM
17

Well, as a hairy man, I'm tired of this bullshit, too. We don't take kindly to feminists wandering here and shouting about how we're wrong, so why does stuff like this get points? Also, so what if the women who go there are hairy? How is that relevant to your last point?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:35 PM
12

Day old account, too.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:33 PM
0

Be nice to believe this happened, but since it's a new account, I'm skeptical. Still a nice story though.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:37 PM
84

Here's a tip: stop going to the feminist subs. Jesus it's like you go to pick a fight. Not just you OP, but I've seen several 'This happened over in /r/feminism' type posts in the past few days and no wonder they get sick of /r/MensRights. Edit: If you must talk about mens rights with feminists, go to /r/FeMRADebates.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:20 PM
7

Good on you. Either way, it might be worth checking out /r/FeMRADebates. When AMR aren't dicking about the conversations are pretty good.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:20 AM
3

Okay, first thing, don't fucking do that you moron. It will wreck your life and while it may feel cathartic good job getting anything done as an ex-con woman-beater. Second, leave her. Pack your shit in the middle of the night and go. Don't tell her where, don't leave a note, don't break or vandalise anything, just dematerialise.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:18 AM
22

They don't really bother us, so we don't really bother them, as far as I'm aware. There may be the occasional individual who goes over there to cause trouble, but if they do, they're a fucking tool. Anyway, I couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:03 PM
-1

This is pretty obviously a joke.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:34 AM
1

The only problem I have is that the constant derision of men who geek out about their hobbies or passions with infantilising portmanteaus, usually involving 'bro-' or 'dude-'.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:50 AM
1

Actually that quote was from a white supremacist.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:21 PM
3

I said the very same thing the other day in /r/FeMRADebates. It's an extension of mocking men for not being stereotypically masculine. Ironically, that's the primary insult used by the sort of person who opposes 'toxic masculinity.'
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:23 AM
6

There really is no better option, is there?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:37 AM
3

[–]Aerik [-1] 3 points 10 hours ago (5|2) you're lying you're stifling contribution and conversation go fuck yourself. The lack of self awareness is stunning.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:47 PM
3

Since when can a gold bar be a feminist?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:51 PM
1

Formatting's all wonky.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:49 PM
4

So women were better off when they literally couldn't do anything independent of a man? You heard it here first, folks: Germaine Greer is a traditionalist.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:48 AM
3

You are trolling, that much is obvious. Society doesn't condone or enable rape. In any way. They also don't see men as victims.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:17 PM
6

Dude chill out. This is like the MRM equivalent of 'a man touched me on the subway today so I reported him for rape.'
/r/MensRights23/04/14 11:58 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:47 PM
5

No, see, again, you're confusing anti-feminist with anti-woman. So you still haven't provided any examples.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:25 PM
5

no one outright says anti women's rights, but they group together women and feminists, and i agree with the first commenter who said that true feminists believe in real equality, instead of being positive and pro men's rights this sub constantly tries to say fuck women and fuck feminism - this sub is not a healthy way to promote equality Still gonna need examples of anti-woman (not anti-feminist) sentiment from this sub.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:05 PM
1

If you're too scared to bring it up, that's generally not a sign that the people you are involved in are 'the good guys' (for want of a better term.)
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:08 PM
1

If you don't mind my asking, where do you stand now? Still feminist? MRA? Egalitarian? Or do you not label yourself any more?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:48 AM
5

Yeah this literally never happened.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:31 AM
2

The Pocahontas one looks fuckin' awesome.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:49 AM
1

So have you ever felt uncomfortable or unwelcome in this sub?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:42 PM
7

It's written by Amanda Marcotte. What did you expect?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:18 AM
2

What's happening is they're focusing on the Men part of the label and not whatever else happens to be attached to it. Gay man? Still a man. Trans man? Still a man.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:32 PM
1

I disagree. Arguing a concept solves nothing when there are effects from the supposed concepts that need to be addressed. Additionally, if privilege is inherited, and thus unchangeable, through history and culture then surely combating the effects to change the present and current cultures would be a better long-term goal as it would change the preempt a change in the concept. Other than that, your reply makes very little sense. Privilege is often said to have effects on peoples lives, but when …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:24 PM
2

Without an example you may as well be trying to convince an atheist that god exists and is everywhere. Saying that privilege is cultural doesn't mean anything, it just abstracts it and makes it vastly more vague, and when you get to that level trying to argue against it is like trying to punch smoke. That is why you are being asked for examples. Because if you can provide one, someone else can provide a counterexample, and then discussion can progress.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:41 AM
31

Can you get evidence of these things?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:29 AM
-2

Can you not report her to the administration for hate speech or something?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:28 AM
13

I believe that image is shopped.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:20 PM
3

WikiMANNia looks like it's shaping up to be the mirror image of RationalWiki. This is not a good thing.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:13 AM
13

Sounds like the university was trying to find guilt rather than the truth. I'm sorry you had to go through this.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:32 AM
3

No.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:31 PM
1

/r/thathappened
/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:21 PM
7

So how do you feel about the phrase 'neckbearded virgin'?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 11:47 AM
47

My experiences with self-proclaimed feminists has been more in line with the tweets than with your definition, and I judge by actions, not words.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:53 PM
6

What makes it less representative than your brand of feminism? They're louder, people pay more attention to them. How are they not representative?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:02 PM
15

Sorry, no. It may say that, but the reaction of feminists is vastly different.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:34 AM
3

You've got a strange value system if you think that calling someone a bad name is worse than actively wishing them harm.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:13 AM
2

Then do you really get to call out others for using an "ableist slur"?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:51 AM
6

Source?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 09:44 PM
2

Maybe so, but they can point at that as an example to try and convince people with a neutral viewpoint.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:21 PM
2

That's a fair point, however the easy-to-digest stuff gets upvotes because it's, well, easy to digest, takes no thought. Ends up at the top of the sub. Gives people ammo to paint us as 'angry white guys.'
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:04 PM
1

I'd argue it shows us as petty, because it focuses on the interpersonal rather than the institutional.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:49 PM
5

What did she say? The woman who hugged you, that is.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:08 AM
6

You mean another tumblr troll. There's no way that's real.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:07 PM
1

Are often linked. Some of us just suck at explaining.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:19 PM
6

You don't know if they'll do this until you're involved with them. The two options that follow are: Mistrust of all women. Get to know the woman you're planning on sleeping with on a deeper level. The first is insane. The second is practical.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 04:56 PM
-1

At 85,000 subscribers vs. 119 I think we don't have to worry about them pushing propaganda. Don't actively give them any attention. Dismiss them calmly and factually if they come up anywhere you are, but don't seek them out to shout at them. It's a waste of energy.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:41 PM
1

Maybe there are less women in e-sports because men are better players. That's the part I take issue with. Nothing to back that up.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:11 PM
-1

Why post any proof to counter your point when you've posted nothing to support it? You're just sat in the corner, talking to yourself.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:58 AM
-2

It's an SRS sub. Just ignore them. They're not worth the effort it takes to get angry
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:19 AM
21

Changing attitudes towards male disposability.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:19 PM
1

You're wrong about the second part. Their website says as much. Man On The Run 5K Herne Bay, Kent 6th July 2014 It is a male-only race
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:31 AM
2

In the UK, there's a women-only breast cancer event called the Race For Life.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:30 AM
1

Formatting makes it a little hard to read. Put two line breaks before each line to set it on a new line.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 02:04 PM
4

But Friendship is Magic.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:29 AM
5

Seconded. This sub would flip it's collective shit if the genders were flipped.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:27 PM
7

Aside: Is this lecture going to be videoed?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:23 PM
1

Wrong. The actual joke is about how little Player Characters care about the plight of whoever they're supposed to be rescuing, especially once they've reached the basic level of achievement required to complete the grindy quest. It's a joke about the players, saying that no matter how awful the situations are, once the player has met the minimum requirements, they will be gone. It could be murder, it could be the cannibalisation of infants, it could be animal abuse. Nope. Players don't care. The…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:58 AM
2

... How was the whole dickwolves thing brutal? To call it a 'rape joke' is a stretch, too.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:43 PM
3

Holy shit the comments on that site are fucking atrocious. Then again, so is this. Just in a different way. This is just utterly contrary to the neutrality of Wikipedia. Also, the design of it is masculine? I have no problems with wanting to improve the design of Wikipedia, but to claim it's sexist is just so fucking bonkers I can't take you seriously.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 04:38 PM
11

By this logic, DV shouldn't be a massive issue in the MRM because far fewer men die from any DV they experience. Jesus. Violence is wrong no matter how severe.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:21 AM
25

I'd probably go as far as the mods banning Tumblr links and Facebook screenshots.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:04 PM
1

That's good to know.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:02 PM
1

I contacted lawyers, but they said it's past the statute of limitations for libel or defamation, so I'm SoL.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:45 PM
8

Burn.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:00 AM
2

Who was she, what college?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:12 AM
1

Not the point I was making. The point was, because he's known worldwide and his reputation isn't exactly that of a scholar, anything he says which goes against Social Justice thinking will be dismissed as the ramblings of one of the members of the Old Boys Club, the witterings of a misogynist and not worth taking seriously. Consequently, anyone who does try to talk about it will only end up being put in the same box as Bill, no matter how well read and well intentioned they are.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:15 PM
18

So? It's a blog. Who cares.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:58 PM
1

I'ma watch this when I get home.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:51 PM
6

That won't really help us. Bill will be blasted as a misogynist and any discussion of the pay gap will grind to a halt. For what it's worth, I don't like Bill either.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:22 AM
1

Oh I quite agree. I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's an improvement. I couldn't do any better, certainly.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:25 PM
1

Actually it was the opposite. Posts made closer to the time of the OP were the highest simply because they were first. So he weighted them by time. At least I think that's it.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:09 PM
1

The voting system is atrocious, both for new entries and comments. Ironically, Randall Munroe helped write it.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:46 PM
1

AskMen.com is utter shite.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:45 PM
1

I'm sorry, but even giving you that, three of the shows main antagonists are female. Trixie, Chrysalis and Nightmare Moon. The whole point is that they're not going to represent masculinity in a deep and meaningful way in a show marketed to girls. And neither should they have to. And nor should a cartoon for boys represent femininity in a deep and meaningful way. If they did, Deedee from Dexter's Lab would be decried as misogynistic. The show doesn't show that 'ew boys are icky' or 'omg boys are…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 11:49 PM
1

They don't discuss masculinity at all in MLP:FiM. Why should they? It's a show with female main characters, I can't imagine masculinity is one of the things they worry about very frequently. They have never stated that masculinity is bad, nor have they stated that femininity is wonderful. You've got more than one type of male character on the show, and more than one type of female character in the main cast. Rarity and Fluttershy are the most typically feminine, Rainbow Dash is a tomboy, Appleja…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 11:01 PM
3

Misandry in MLP:FiM? Are you serious? There aren't many male characters, but they are spread between good and bad. And beside, it's targetted at young girls. Why would they promote male friendships to young girls? Why not friendships that young girls can identify with?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:46 PM
6

The decrease in chance of infection is not substantial enough to warrant it. [1] [2] As for being sanitary, this is easily circumvented by washing.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:12 PM
6

So you're okay with people tattooing their babies then?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:00 PM
5

In what ways is circumcision necessary?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:56 PM
7

If there's no medical advantage, or disadvantage, why perform the procedure in the first place?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:56 PM
6

Because you're unnecessarily cutting healthy flesh off of a child for reasons that boil down to tradition/aesthetics.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:55 PM
12

It's not about whether or not you're okay with your dick. It's about the fact that you're cutting a healthy bodypart off of a newborn for reasons that boil down to aesthetics or tradition, neither of which are acceptable.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:52 PM
5

We can thank one of the Kellogg brothers for that
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:50 PM
14

I doubt this really happened. At least not the way you tell it. The dialogue sounds too fake.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:55 PM
1

Horseshoe theory in action.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:41 PM
7

I said it before in another sub, I'll say it here; Genderqueer does not demolish gender roles, no matter what you think. If anything it helps reinforce them, because you're saying that you aren't a wo/man if you enjoy things that aren't typically wo/manly. Deciding your gender on a day-to-day basis is particularly bad at reinforcing gender roles, because you are pretty much literally deciding to do it on a whim.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:57 PM
1

I'll admit I don't know much about the ACA, and was mostly responding to Suttreee's comment about providing free healthcare and Jeepski's comment about taxes being money.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:49 PM
1

Free at the point of use. If I need a ride to hospital, it doesn't cost me anything at that point because I've already paid for it, essentially.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:12 AM
1

So they try and end the 'girl hate' among women by practicing 'girl hate' when another woman disagrees with them? In this case, internalised misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:35 PM
1

I'm saying that teens are underpaid, and there is a reason for that. I didn't mean to imply that women were underpaid. I was trying to say that, on a 1v1 scale, they're not. The question I was asking was that teens are underpaid for a reason, and I was asking Grapeban if they felt that women were equal to an incompetent teenager. I could have worded it better.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:08 PM
1

I don't follow.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:38 PM
1

Any data to support this hypothesis?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:48 PM
1

... People age. Do you gradually change gender as the years progress? Also, at seventeen, you have less experience and no qualifications except your GCSE's. Are you seriously saying that, in terms of wage gap, women are equivalent to unskilled, unqualified, inexperienced teenagers?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:55 PM
2

Because men are expected to be providers. They go out, work and bring in stuff for the rest of the family to survive. If they don't, they're seen as worthless. It's not that women are seen as weak, it's that men are seen as tools.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:53 PM
-1

Where did I say that? I was pointing out how having UKIP associated with men's rights is damaging to the public image of the movement. For the record though, UKIP want to repeal the Human Rights Act 1998. So I'm going to go with, no, a UKIP parliament would not be a force for good. Democracy and good are not synonymous.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:01 PM
0

In fact, a few species have died out due to the effects of female sexual selection. [Citation needed]
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:00 AM
-2

UKIP have got a lot of support, but none of it good, and the only reason they have that much support is because of their stance on immigration. They're riding that in hopes of winning the elections. None of the leaders of the other parties take him seriously because of his stance on, well, most things. They've been recorded making sexist, racist and homophobic remarks, and if the Daily Mail is calling you racist, well you're probably pretty racist. Having UKIP come out in favour of men's rights …
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:51 AM
-1

It's hardly a counterpoint now, is it?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:00 PM
0

Oh absolutely. So not-rascist.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:18 PM
5

Being from the UK, I know who UKIP are. I know they have a majority. That doesn't make them any more credible. They're like a real life Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:29 PM
10

It came from Nigel Farage. This won't help our credibility.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:45 PM
4

Well done, MLK. Sorry things turned out so shitty.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:22 PM
1

⸮ Works.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:01 PM
6

Sarcasm is difficult to relay without tone. It's why the /s tag was invented.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:26 PM
4

Your post was just a whinge about something which OP has changed her mind about. If you wanna have a go at her for an opinion she no longer holds, then you're very welcome, but still wrong to do so.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:45 PM
5

That's neither helpful nor relevant to the discussion at hand.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:15 PM
2

So what, you've never thought a woman was attractive before you got to know her? Saw your lower reply.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:07 PM
7

It means attractive in a conventionally masculine way.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:10 PM
2

Right here.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:29 PM
19

Sribble every disparaging term you can think of for a man down on that piece of paper.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:59 AM
1

So you're saying that the Independent offers a better look at this subject than the Daily Mail? Colour me surprised.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:36 PM
1

Just so you know, to quote something, put a > before the text. Like so.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:41 AM
3

For 2-3 that can, they either look awkward or very masculine when skating, which is unappealing to me. What has that got to do with anything? Either way, skateboarding is not a woman's sport only due to the fact that less women are interested in it.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:32 AM
3

You should probably post this to the parent thread. Edit: Link to the study saved for posterity.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:15 AM
23

That's probably the most incisive comment I've ever read regarding feminists and male gender roles.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:11 PM
5

Sadly not. Redd is well known on /r/TumblrInAction for this kind of crazy.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:39 PM
1

Equality of opportunity. The idea that gender, race, sexual orientation, religion, height, etc. should not disallow you from basic rights, like the right to work, etc., nor should it disallow you from competing. I don't agree with a forced equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:44 AM
5

No thanks. I do want equality. I don't want to be perpetually fighting something.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:12 AM
5

I'll kiss him if she won't.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:23 PM
7

... Why the fuck did he do it? What a dick.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:39 PM
11

more comprehensive and applicable research asks 'why and how' a particular group is marginalized/oppressed. But you're starting with the premise that they are oppressed. Rather than asking 'are these people oppressed, and if so, in what ways,' the question is 'how are these people oppressed.' This ends up with a constantly changing definition of 'oppression' because, no matter the actual freedoms of the group, they are still defined as oppressed.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:01 AM
13

Disagree. If you start with the premise of 'women are oppressed, men are the oppressors' you're going to find the evidence you want to find.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:24 AM
2

It's about a person having to get on their knees and clean up dried piss. If you're a janitor, that's part of the job. Tough shit. Everyone does their best to not make a mess. You still have to clean up the accidents or misses.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:10 PM
2

What an open minded response.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:57 PM
3

This pretty much coincides with my opinion on the subject, and I hope OP reads it. OP himself may not be sexist, but any belief that requires one sex inhibit themselves more than another is sexist.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:56 PM
2

That's really what I took away from reading the article. There's plenty of legitimate criticism to be aimed at Jezebel, like the two links they mentioned. Those merit discussion. This article is just frustrated shouting that, ironically, reads very much like a Jezebel article. Only far less smug.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:04 PM
5

See this is a legit privilege. Quotas are enforced, but if there were no quotas, employers would favour a race or gender. Now, I'd be curious to see the race and gender of the employers, to see if this was racism, or in-group preference. Would black employers be more likely to hire black employees, for example?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:20 PM
5

Doesn't account for the following: Profession Role in profession Those are the big two. The others that I can think of off the top of my head are as follows; Level of seniority Level of education Employer Overtime worked Time off taken Missing the first two, the graph is useless.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:36 AM
1

Oh my god that made me feel old. Probably not intentionally, and I'm not even that old, but holy hell.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:04 AM
2

I like it. My favourite of hers so far is Dixon's Girl.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:32 PM
1

Always happy to hear new music. She's good.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 02:05 PM
5

[tumblring intensifies]
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:18 PM
1

21 shocking bodies that will make you feel normal 21 shocking bodies. NOW magazine, if you want people to feel good about their bodies, don't fucking describe them as shocking. How thick are you? But of course, Lads Mags are worse. How dare people look at a body and not criticise it!?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:39 PM
-1

I was going to say the same thing. I seriously hope OP isn't getting anti-women rhetoric confused with men's issues.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:25 PM
3

The amount of times I've heard 'no (female body parts), no opinion,' the reaction I'm beginning to think would be best would be 'no penis, no opinion.'
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:21 PM
3

Male. Ask him about morning wood then. Think of someone he specifically finds grossly unattractive and ask how he'd feel if he woke up to her riding his morning wood. Edit: Also point out that the question wasn't about still getting those no-reason erections, but to point out the fact that they're not purely voluntary.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:33 PM
3

Point out how stupid it is to assume they have full control over their erections. Something like 'so all those hard-ons you got during class at school were because you were aroused by learning?' Or something less dumb and better worded.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:37 PM
6

This is hardly big news. This is the BBC reporting on what is trending on twitter.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:36 PM
1

Did you actually read what he said?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:12 PM
13

Very Strongly Disagree. Homosexuality isn't something you choose for political reasons, or at all, for that matter, and the majority of people don't care about the 'traditional family values' this survey implies, so it's about as brave as braveryjerk.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:27 AM
2

I know, but the mods and admins on Reddit are really touchy about it.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:42 PM
11

This probably constitutes doxxing, just so you know.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:08 PM
2

He didn't deal with her too well, to be honest, but that's fair enough considering it's his first heckler
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:13 PM
1

While I doubt it's just 10%, I think that globally women may indeed earn less, and this doesn't surprise me, when you have countries like Saudi Arabia that don't even allow women to drive.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:09 PM
6

Oh, that works fine as a response. I never said a counter or rebuttal.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:20 AM
15

ALSO; prepare a response to the inevitable 'feminism will fix these things' answer to the above post.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:35 AM
1

You think so? We'll see you on TiA then.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:40 AM
6

So even if someone says they explicitly don't want what you say they do, they're wrong?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:12 AM
4

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:47 PM
8

Where does it say that?
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:26 PM
-21

That's not even equivalent. It would be equivalent if she were rinsing her vagina thoroughly with rubbing alcohol after ever sexual session, and yes, that would be a problem.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:53 PM
20

The guy scrubs his condoms with rubbing alcohol. He has trust issues. Being in charge of your own birth control is one thing, taking it to that level of extreme paranoia is not.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:37 PM
5

This is three things: Kinda childish. Very satisfying. Not really /r/MensRights material.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:34 AM
2

It's irrelevant. Curiously though, it's used by the same people who say that the spotlight for homelessness should be on homeless women because they are often overlooked due to the majority of homeless people being men.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 12:48 PM
1

This is really more appropriate for SRSSucks.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:56 PM
4

You're misunderstanding the use of the word in this context.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:58 AM
1

That seems a bit silly. I'm a LibDem and I think she makes good points.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:01 AM
1

You didn't actually address my point. I'm not saying LPS decides the fate of a baby, I'm saying that it puts the not-inconsiderable financial burden of a baby onto a single person in the event it is birthed.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:09 PM
0

I'm in the minority in this sub that I think LPS is a bad idea. At the end of an abortion, there's no baby to look after. If someone signs away their rights to a child and that child is brought to term, the burden is no longer split between two people and is placed upon one person, and babies aren't cheap. I don't have the answer, but I don't think LPS is a good idea.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:46 PM
1

In that case, these people can be notable feminists from now on.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:53 PM
5

Paedophile hysteria is huge here in the UK (blame the tabloids, really.) I mean my driving instructor, way back when, had trouble with neighbourhood kids throwing rocks at his car, which was also his livelihood. He called the police and they said they weren't going to do anything. So he said that he was taking photos of them. There was a squad car there inside ten minutes.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 09:37 PM
2

The former. I don't really care what you believe about it, to be honest.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:01 PM
4

I see you conveniently missed the point where I changed my post to say exactly what you said in this post, only without being a huge tool about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:03 AM
4

That's a fair point. We shouldn't get to dismiss something out of hand. We should try to avoid ideological purges.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:32 PM
6

Okay yeah let's pull a feminism and allow people to use the MRM platform to shout out about how gay people are the worst and unnatural or whatever they're going to say. Let's let that happen and say nothing. Then let's watch what happens to our public image! Great plan.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:26 PM
8

I agree. I was going to come back to edit my post a while ago, but illness sidetracks. What I meant to say is that we need to prevent people from hijacking the movement to push racist/sexist/etc. agendas. They are free to hold these views, but they must be separate from their advocacy. Quick question if I may; as a gay man, what makes you more interested in the MRM than the vocally pro-gay feminism?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:59 PM
50

I think this is a good idea, since we seem a bit directionless at the moment. Also, this will be an unpopular opinion, but we do need to denounce people who call themselves MRA's who are sexist or homophobic or transphobic or whatever. prevent the movement from being hijacked by those who would use it to push a racist/sexist/etc. agenda. They are allowed to hold these views, but they must be separate from their MRM advocacy. At the very least we can't let the extremists become the loudest voices…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:12 AM
0

No. People are victimised in day to day life all the time. It sucks, but it's a fact. This is not to do with mens rights. It's not systematic and the victim was not targeted for being male. The victims gender is incidental to the abuse. This is like those women in the YouTube videos who claim everything is misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:13 PM
5

I'm not really inclined to believe that this is real. At least I hope it isn't.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 06:37 AM
1

Well yeah, but he ran an entertainment service.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:40 AM
2

Yeah, but contrary to what P.T. Barnum believes, there is such a thing as bad publicity. We need good PR.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:38 PM
1

Perhaps not a 'rally,' as such. No bullhorns and chanting and shouting. That'd push people away. Things with a positive public image would be a good idea. Though rather than using them solely to push the MRM, fundraise for places or things the MRM advocates for, and then inform people about the MRM through these. Build up the association to worthy causes, rather than trying to convince people that we're worthy from the outset.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:52 AM
2

So, what, we shouldn't accept gay men into the MRM?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:42 AM
2

Maybe because there's this sort of theme that makes us feel like we're not wanted?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:48 AM
2

You didn't link.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:04 PM
8

Not the first time they've been irony-blind. Honestly the DM is just fucking dreadful in every respect.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:43 AM
6

I'd probably open with something like "Okay, let's not call prejudice against men sexism then. Does that make it more okay? If you're prejudiced towards someone, an individual or a group of people, for any reason that relies on stereotypes, is that absolutely fine with you so long as the word doesn't end in '-ism'? That's what the 'can't be sexist against men' argument boils down to. Semantics."
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:49 AM
0

If a woman sleeps around with worthy men, she's not a "slut." If a woman cheats on a "less worthy" man with a "more worthy" man she might be a treacherous bitch but she's not a "slut" because she's trading up. I never looked at it like that.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:00 PM
4

It was initially done to combat spammers, which makes sense. However when they start SBanning people who are actually using the site, it gets really sketchy. At least one of the admins has been SBanning people from subs like /r/SRSSucks for a while now, for reasons that would lead to the whole of SRS being shadowbanned if they were fairly applied. Edit: Examples.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:18 AM
2

I always figured Sheik was pretty androgynous.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:38 AM
-1

I don't see how someone can be an idiot for never having experienced something.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:27 PM
8

While that's a good point, we do need to be vocal in stating moderate opinions and denouncing extremists. People who say that transmen aren't men, for example. Otherwise you get into the clusterfuck that feminism has, where the term is so nebulous that you lose focus. We can't lose focus.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:53 AM
1

I've heard he's a nice bloke, but yeah, his policies are a bit cuntish.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:38 AM
-2

If we let the dominant voices become angry young men, we will end up with our own 'Big Red' and any credibility we have is gone.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:12 PM
3

You, uh, may be missing the point
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:48 PM
10

Why? It's not a question.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:16 PM
30

How many rapists are putting on a condom first?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:08 AM
-1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:19 PM
5

Not helpful.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:19 PM
1

I saw that. In what world are self defense classes $200 a month? The most expensive ones I've seen around where I live are £40 a month at the absolute maximum.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:05 AM
7

Aye, which I think is a misuse.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:29 PM
25

Well a shadowban is to combat spammers, so giving them a reason would be inefficient. However I think Shadowbans should be limited to spammers.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:52 PM
1

Oh I've just heard it more from Scots and Londoners is all. I've spent a fair bit of time in Wales, though granted only the south of it, and never once heard the word 'cunt' uttered. I'm sure you do, it's just that I've never heard it said with a Welsh accent, and thus it's not something I associate with Wales.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:11 AM
1

Makes sense, but Welsh is not one of the nationalities that springs to mind when I think of people casually calling each other cunts.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:14 AM
-4

Way to prove me wrong, buddy.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:43 PM
2

Oh yeah, I get the frustration, but some people can be less-than-polite.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:10 PM
72

Good to have you. Stick around! And hopefully don't give too much though to the angry few.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:10 AM
36

Couple of SRSers in there and others with no history of /r/MensRights posting. Reported it to the admins. Yeah, it got brigaded.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:09 AM
5

You've clearly never visited Scotland, England or Australia if you think the word cunt is gender-specific.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 08:47 AM
1

The user Retrograde seems to get it.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:34 AM
2

equality between men and women [snip] leads to a system of female supremacy. Citation desperately needed.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:20 PM
6

If you say it like that, sure. You'll sound like a pretentious fuckwit. If you say something like 'Oh, I thought it looked nice,' I doubt people would care.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:44 PM
11

Love, be the change you want to see in the world. You are part of society. If you don't like how it's working, then fucking change it.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:58 AM
6

Holy fuck is that comments section seriously suggesting that Islam is the best way to go for the MRM? Fuck me. No. No no.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:15 PM
3

Link to that?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:03 PM
3

Notice the np.reddit.com link, buddy. Can't vote through those.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:17 PM
4

I was about to say, the Daily Mail is almost single-handedly responsible for this sort of attitude.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:26 AM
3

Intelligence and affection.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:47 PM
2

Oh yeah, they're getting better quicker, but that has nothing to do with the ridiculous stereotypes and sexism towards both genders in this blogpost.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:33 PM
4

Well yeah, but the list of things I want in a partner is pretty damn long and you end up with a complex person, not a robot. It's easier to list what I don't want in a partner.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:07 PM
9

This list plays on so many stereotypes it's unbelievable. For a start, I don't want a woman that just cooks and fucks, I'm not a neanderthal. The assumptions this blog post makes about men are equally ridiculous as the ones it makes about women.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:26 AM
0

Oh it's nice to laugh at the hypocrisy, but ironically this post is pretty hypocritical itself. Anywho, I'm done now. <3
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:35 PM
1

Tact does not equal weakness. I'd argue it's a larger character flaw to find offense in innocuous comics on the internet. As for being a concern troll, you can think what you like about me, and you can throw out all the discussion-ending clichés that you like, but please do not stand around and complain when the MRM gets nothing but bad press and hatred.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:58 PM
1

Well see then you risk alienating potential allies and damaging the image of the MRM by attacking a group that is fantastic at manipulating sympathy and playing the victim.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:45 PM
-1

But we're not trying to change the minds of feminists, we're trying to change the minds of onlookers. Trying to change the mind of an ideologue is a futile effort. Resorting to this childish 'don't make jokes we don't like' will only make the MRM look bad, which will be pretty damaging considering it is still in it's infancy in terms of awareness and how seriously it's taken.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:24 PM
1

Yep. They need to calm down, too. We need to make people aware of the double standard, rather than stooping to the same low level that certain prominent internet feminists use.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:39 PM
0

Oh calm down, it's a comic.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:46 AM
2

Why not give both parts equal merit, since both are critical for a soldier?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:19 AM
0

Yeah, but the image says "The scientifically proven fact of Gynosympathy."
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:04 PM
-4

Sorry, if you're gonna claim something is a scientific fact, you'll need to prove that.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:48 PM
1

Well that's a coincidence! That's where I got the name from!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:57 PM
32

Interesting read, and thank you very much!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:57 PM
83

Gonna need a source for the 'fact' of Gynosympathy.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:43 PM
-4

I think I'll put some popcorn on.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:41 PM
2

Shame the OP of the thread doesn't seem to be to interested in having his view changed.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:54 PM
7

Well, why is it in the xkcd sidebar? The two subs are unrelated.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 04:54 PM
8

This is really telling. The person who messaged you got super angry about the idea that you lied about being raped. Yet suggest women do the same? You're a misogynist and one of the worst people out there. They blamed the victim, accused them of lying and then told them to kill themselves. So, MRA's are the bad guys, huh? OP, as an experiment, start a new Tumblr, 'shop the posts to flip the genders, and then post them up. See what sort of response you get. The post the unedited ones. See what so…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:22 AM
0

The issues I have with this are the following: They picked Jane Austen because she's a woman. They didn't pick a more important historical female figure. If you have to have a woman on the money, whatever, I don't care, but Jane Austen? Makes it seem like Tokenism.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:50 AM
1

Women are not equall to men. A strong woman is considered a weak man, women seldomly go into engineering. We are biologically different, quit witb this egalitarian bullshit. Its just like races within homosapians. Given this trainwreck of a comment, you shouldn't consider yourself superior to anyone.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter