TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PerformativeRacist Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by PerformativeRacist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

They said 3x stronger, not 3x more likely. Men commit something like 90% of all violent domestic offenses
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 05:28 PM
3

I know little about anything beyond red pill But from what I've seen from purple pill flair posters here, purple pill is just redpill but even more dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 09:17 PM
18

Some of yall have such unhealthy views of relationships and human interaction in general
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 09:04 PM
10

On the JP Morgan case: You're actually making my point. Yes, the claims were found false, The kicker is though if he was fired because of this he can probably sue JP Morgan and get money because that's retaliation. I'm interning at a plaintiff's firm, and yeah, that is absolutely not how it works. Otherwise employers could never fire anyone for fear of a suit at any moment. For a retaliation suit, the employee has to have engaged in protected speech, suffered a loss of some kind, and that loss m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 10:31 PM
13

Frivolous and false accusations against men. Is increasing because technology can prove which things better did not happen for the most part False accusations are wrong, and I'd agree with even harsher punishments for them. Telling women to shut up about accusations is also wrong. The problem is that chuds bring them up to shut down things like MeToo. Women filming explicit content in public spaces, exposing bystanders without consent. When men call it out the women noticeably at least more than…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 10:08 PM
–

There was segregation up to the 1960's. And it was white politicians, legislators, and policemen that created and enforced laws which gave blacks their rights. That doesn't make their rights invalid, the same women's rights aren't invalid simply because they're not the dominant group. I really want to take the redpillers more seriously, but the quality of discussion I'm seeing from the same dozen accounts is just bottom of the barrel and almost 4chan esque
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:04 PM
–

As a man if you try to take mine away you automatically risk losing your life. You in a comment below: I’m black. So if white men were able to subjugate your people, are your rights now invalid?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:56 PM
–

You have a great personality as well
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:10 PM
–

I’m not refusing to consider that possibility at all. Some people really are just ugly and will struggle because of that, no matter what. But most incels I’ve seen are within the average range of looks, and are just incredibly socially inept, or have this crippling defeatist mindset that they resign themselves to failure with Some people also have incredibly repulsive and off putting personalities, that will make them very unattractive to the vast majority of people. A lot of the men on here hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:02 PM
–

If you’re ugly it will make you less attractive. If you have an ugly personality, it will also make you less attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:42 PM
3

Definitely. Different women will have different levels of comfort in being approached. Obviously, guys can't read their minds, and women can't expect to be invisible to any and all human contact when out in public. In my experience, if you approach politely and walk away as soon as you realize she's not interested, the worst you'll ever get is a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:49 PM
7

I'm not understanding what the big deal is. If you see a woman you find attractive and you want to approach her, do it. If she says no or visually displays disinterest, you just walk away. Where's the inconsistency or danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:35 PM
4

Could you explain this 'fog' more? Genuine question I don't usually approach women unless I've seen them looking at me, but of the times I've approached I've had 0 issues. If they're interested there will be consistent eye contact and an effort to continue the convo, if she's not, I walk away What else is going to happen beyond that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:30 PM
0

If male sexuality is framed as predatory or harmful Outside of some small extremist elements in the women's camp, I've never seen women at large or society argue that male sexuality is inherently predatory or harmful. And from my perspective, the expectations on men feel contradictory. Men are still expected to approach, initiate, and show confidence, but men also judged more harshly if men misread the situation. That tension makes the “rules” feel inconsistent, which is why I can understand why…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:16 PM
0

What's interesting is that the link you posted has this: One study found that the effect is mediated by increased gender equality. The mediation comes not from differences in attitudes towards women, but in attitudes towards men. In more egalitarian societies, people have less negative attitude towards men than in less egalitarian societies.\6]) In other words, the patriarchy is what enables this effect. Traditional gender norms and language enable this effect. Red pillers may claim to care abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:41 AM
4

But again this is widespread and well known, if it actually worked why would these spaces even exist? Because not everyone succeeds on the dating market. So people experiencing the same failures will coalesce to bond over their shared experiences. Eventually, they form theories as to why they've experienced failure, and what they can do to achieve success. That doesn't mean their theories are correct If having a great personality and putting yourself out there and just getting more female friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:11 PM
19

That's pretty much it. All the women I've dated wanted to be complimented when they put effort into an outfit, and also didn't want to be told what they can and can't wear. Seems pretty simple to me
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:21 PM
10

According to who?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:14 PM
14

Either girls prefer misogynist boys. Or boys that are more successful develop more anti-feminist views. Btw, we are speaking about young people here. I wouldn't really say either conclusion can be drawn from the data. Correlation doesn't equal causation after all. Your link does show that misogyny is likely more complex than the simple “lonely rejected boys become misogynists” explanation, but it doesn’t prove the opposite either. The fact that more socially active or dating boys may show lower …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:39 AM
–

Honestly what are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:30 AM
8

Because men insult women simply for being women. Men insult men for sucking at the game
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:17 AM
3

No, but it's just kind of unnecessary imo
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:41 AM
4

I disagree. If we've gone on 1-2 dates I think people are entitled to a "this isn't gonna work out" message. If it's an internet stranger you've merely matched with, there's really no expectation or social code that you need to message that person and tell them you're no longer interested The same way if I exchange glances with someone at a bar, I might've expressed interest, but nobody would seriously argue that I have to walk over and tell them "actually I don't want to talk to you anymore, ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:50 PM
13

The thing is that a lot of redpill beliefs and explanations are often rooted in a lack of social experience and exposure. I.e., anyone who goes out regularly can tell you the 80/20 thing is a complete myth. But for guys who live their entire lives online and only interact with women on apps, it's a compelling thing to believe
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:50 PM
3

Just gonna answer with a tangent. Factors like race also play a role in determining one's market value. Many wouldn't be okay with certain races valuing themselves higher just b/c the market says so bc racism still exists. It's like saying the market has spoken when there are problematic ideas still to be discussed and debated. That's a fair point. But are certain men not being picked because there's a wave of misandry keeping them down? Or is it that more is expected of men than ever before, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:38 PM
3

Why are you assuming there aren't any barriers now that are hurting men or affecting the market? Like what? whether it be social media, political zeitgeist, social programs, OLD, and such. This is all part of the market. None of those are artificial barriers
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:18 PM
7

Well the example you chose (women having to choose mediocre men for resources) came about because women were artificially barred from earning money. They couldn't go to college, and they couldn't work high-paying jobs or own property. That only existed because men didn't let them. If the barriers are removed, and women just aren't picking certain men, well, that is the market deciding, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:11 PM
7

Ofc the "market is law" BS again. Back in the day when women couldn't own property many women had to resort to sacking up with fat old ugly abusive men just bc they owned a house or had some type of means, but nobody defends the market in that context. I mean yeah, that was the market back then. It's no longer the case, and rightfully so Or the highly educated women who see their eligible prospects shrinking bc less men are going to college and there are way more women in these spaces than men n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:04 PM
–

BP doesn't really have a cohesive ideology or set of viewpoints like RP does. BP is defined purely by its opposition to RP. I think you're trying to ascribe viewpoints to BP that don't really make sense, like: For example if we take someone being rejected, you want me to believe that people don't get rejected over looks? I'm not sure I've seen anyone arguing this. Some people get rejected over looks, some get rejected over other things. That's life. RP wants to tell you that only a top X% of men…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:32 PM
–

I'm not even sure what the huge controversial thing is surrounding it either Women want guys they find attractive, just like guys want women they find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:30 PM
19

Then avoid those women and don't date them. Makes zero sense to attempt to contort yourself into something hoping that it meets the approval of others. A lot of guys spend so much time worrying about women they aren't even compatible with, or shouldn't be interested in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 12:02 AM
35

IMO, if you need to do all of this to get a woman to like you, she really isn't that into you. And if a woman does actually like toxic behaviors and a-hole men, then she has some things she needs to work on, and it's best to avoid her. There are definitely women who like emotionally open, honest, and vulnerable men. Sooo, date those ones Also way too many assertions made with 0 data to back it up. And lots of treating women like a monolith with no differing viewpoints. I think if everyone on her…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:52 PM
11

No it's entirely possible to over-analyze things, and I'd say you are here. Even if I were to concede that it’s more about “social competence” than about status (I won’t) It literally is. Everything you described was about social competence. You haven't actually mentioned anything involving status. Imagine telling some socially awkward guy who possibly has either autism or social anxiety disorder that all he has to do is be socially competent. What point is this supposed to defeat? Yes, autistic…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:43 AM
9

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091110105401.htm https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13077?af=R Why do men divorce women that get sick, far more than women divorce men that get sick?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:33 AM
15

who I am as a person has absolutely nothing to do with how I treat women. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:32 AM
26

Some of you guys distill social interaction and human emotion down to such minute levels of detail, when it really doesn't need to be. You also state points as if they're logical truths, instead of your own biased opinion based on vibes. Like: Men who are seen as “funny” by others are usually also high status, and it’s not that they’re high status because they’re funny, it’s that they’re considered funny because they’re high status. What is this based on? Anytime a woman is attracted to a man's …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:18 AM
–

You need calories and protein to build muscle, lifting weights is just one part of the equation. You need to eat more. Especially more protein.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:28 PM
–

What, do you wanna be in the room in a little chair watching next time?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:20 PM
–

Ofc looks matter for women as well, and you should want a women to be into your looks. Sometimes people need to put work into improving their looks in order to see romantic success OP is in that position
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:19 PM
–

I'm 5'7 and do not struggle with women. You can be short, but you cannot also weigh the same as a 14 yo boy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:14 PM
–

Going to the gym 140+ times means nothing if you aren't eating enough to fuel your body. You need to eat more.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:05 PM
–

I checked your post history, and you're 5'6 105 lbs. In other words, severely underweight, and lighter than the vast majority of women. Fill out your frame more, and I guarantee you you'll see a lot more success. I'm an inch taller than you, and at 150 lbs, I feel slightly leaner than I should be. 105 lbs is incredibly skinny
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 09:52 PM
24

This post sounds like you're describing yourself, rather than men as a whole
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 10:07 PM
10

This is a problem of finding the right therapist (which is a difficult task to be fair), not a problem with therapy in of itself. Either way, the incel definitely needs therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 09:40 PM
15

Why there always has to be someone who points out exceptions to generalities. There are some women who are taller than men, but you would agree that in average men are taller than women, right. I think there's enough individual factors at play to not cleanly divide it into gender roles. While a large # of men may be goal oriented, I also think there's many that are not. But lets say we are talking about some insecure basement incel who isnt happy with his life. Instead of telling him to get his …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 08:46 PM
22

Men tend to use more task oriented and problem solving coping strategies. Women tend to use more emotion focused coping and support seeking. Thats not just culturally but also biological ingraned. This is a copout, and not even entirely true. Believe it or not, there are men who prefer emotion focused coping, and there are women who prefer to drown themselves in work when going through things. Alot of men need goals, they need told what to do and get to work. Thats our therapy. Thats why many me…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 08:27 PM
–

So they find you attractive and like being around you. How would that be settling then?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 08:25 PM
–

Is there any data that confirms this? While I can understand the fear around being settled for or used solely for one's resources, isn't that something you'd discover way before getting married? Like you date a woman for some time before marriage, usually at least a couple years. Don't you think you'd discover that she doesn't actually like you all that much? If you're getting married, and you aren't even sure if your SO loves you, you definitely should not get married I also feel like people ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:24 PM
–

I'm having trouble trying to grasp what your actual point is here. Are you saying that relationships are doomed because women have more sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:09 PM
4

'Low quality' doesn't just include your job title or how much money you have. Emotional intelligence and maturity, healthy attraction, free of any toxic behaviors, etc. It's totally possible for a female engineer to have unhealthy attachment issues
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 06:25 PM
8

Women that are getting knocked up by convicts or having babies with men that have multiple baby mamas, are generally lower quality women. I'm not really concerned with what lower quality women are doing, because I have 0 interest in dating them, or even sleeping with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 06:05 PM
2

And I think it's especially true for male traits because women are less varied in their tastes, contradictory cultural narratives notwithstanding. I'm not sure that I agree. When I walk around and look at other couples, there are many instances where I see an attractive woman with a man that I wouldn't consider conventionally attractive at all, and scratch my head. I almost never see that the other way around, unless it's like a good looking dude who has a preference for really big girls or some…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:10 PM
12

There literally is a moral qualification in there. It's implying that women having more agency and choice is a big net loss. I'm not sure how you can hold that opinion without hating women or viewing them as lesser.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:21 PM
13

If you advocate for male circumcision to be illegal, who do you think your biggest opposition is going to be? Hint: It's not women
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:14 PM
10

hypergamy, women's voting rights and their ability to choose a partner and leave him at will has been a big net loss If you hold that opinion you are a chud, and there's really no way around it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:13 PM
8

Yes. But do we know exactly who these men are? Think about it from a woman's perspective. She doesn't have a crystal ball that tells her which men are violent. The violent men aren't walking around with identifying badges. They simply are violent, and some conceal it better than others. All we know is that the overwhelming majority of violence, comes from men. That isn't really a crazy concept either, because when men have daughters, they often exercise the same level of precaution with her arou…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:54 PM
5

If women perpetrated 90% of crimes involving dishonesty, would it not be accurate to say "dishonesty is largely perpetrated by women"? At least as it concerns dishonesty that seriously harms people/institutions. Now of course you couldn't say that all women are dishonest, but you could definitely argue that dishonest acts are generally done by women. It's the same thing here concerning men and violence. Nobody is saying that 'not a monolith' should be used to shut down any and all gendered argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:47 PM
2

Sneakier with what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:35 PM
2

I'm not really sure what you're arguing. It's not like men possess innate biological characteristics that allow only us to perpetrate violence. Women can swing fists, knives, and bats, or shoot guns. They just do it far, far less than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:27 PM
9

Correct. But I don't recall the predominant argument stating that all or most men commit violence, simply that violence is largely perpetrated by men. Something more along the lines of "not all men, but always a man"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:14 PM
19

Sure, but that same source says 90% of violent crime is committed by men. That's a pretty damning statistic, and it's sort of impossible to talk about violence without talking about men as a whole. I guess it depends on how you'd frame that statistic. If you said "All men are violent", that would be clearly wrong and 'not all men' would apply. If you said: "Violence is largely perpetrated by men", it would be pretty hard to argue against that, and 'not all men' wouldn't even really defeat or add…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:59 PM
1

Do you mind listing some of the principals? Genuine question
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:09 AM
5

When someone puts forth a point that is reliant on a term, it's generally on the person putting forth the point to provide the definition/criteria for what encompasses that term. Otherwise, we waste time debating about what a simp is, instead of the salient point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:49 PM
4

Now it's about feelings, validation, and self expression. Are you implying relationships shouldn't be?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:42 PM
14

I get it, all people are different. But the problem is, making the wrong move with the wrong woman – in modern world, can cost a man. Women these days are taught to not hold back against men, so if you do something that frustrates her (and it can be anything – because everyone is different and you can’t know for sure what this specific woman likes or hates) – she can rain hell on you, metaphorically (with words and emotions, to make you feel guilty and ashamed for not knowing the "basic manners"…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:36 PM
8

I mean it could be anything. Undiagnosed mental issues, a hermit who never leaves his house, lack of social skills, etc etc. Being a good person and having a job and a house are great, but there's more that goes into cultivating successful relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:03 PM
–

Which requires you to go to said new places. You can only be at one place at a time. You can also only meet the people at that point and time that are actually interested in you. As opposed to having a lineup of matches you can message at any time It's completely different
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:01 PM
–

"These #'s represent mainstream women!" insert #'s that represent a small subset of a small subset of french women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:01 PM
–

And that doesn't apply to the red pill guys here lmao? Most of the 'arguments' I've seen from TRP involve citing blogposts as data, and then concocting up a fantasy of what they think women are like
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:53 PM
–

Online dating is far more curated and artificial. When you go out in real life you don't have a lineup of people presented to you, you don't have multiple potential options that you can sift between. It's sort of like window shopping, and it can lead to an addictive cycle of always seeking better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:52 PM
–

#1 is for French nationals only, and shows less than a 1/3 of women have had more than 10 sexual partners. #2 shows that 8% of women have participated in group sex. Ok? #3 shows that online dating is not insignificant in encompassing romantic encounters. But like, did anyone really ever argue that nobody uses OLD? I think the argument is moreso that OLD is quite a bit different from meeting people in real life. Also, people who go on reddit to debate gender discourse and theory are in the absolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:45 PM
2

Reading a lot of comments on here, you can sort of just tell when someone doesn't interact with any women at all beyond their immediate family.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:57 PM
4

But a man who has an easy time attracting women has already done the hard part. Which is to become sexually attractive as a man. That's where his laurels come from, the women he sleeps with is really just a way to keep score. Do you notice the language you're using? You're describing women as points to be earned in a game. And that's why there's a double standard surrounding promiscuity. Because you (and the men with the same viewpoint) don't actually view women as human beings with their own de…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:22 PM
4

Is that so? So if a really attractive 'chad' or famous guy is promiscuous with many women, should he be shamed because sex comes easy to him? The answer for the vast majority of men is no, in fact, they usually praise guys like that and aspire to be them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:06 PM
3

Is that not literally the definition of a double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 06:42 PM
10

Idk why you're framing it in terms of winners and losers Society generally puts more of an expectation on women to be pure and have low body counts, and there's a lot of associated shaming with not doing so. Both from men and women. So women don't want to be seen as sluts. However for men it's the opposite, we receive aura points if anything for sleeping around a lot. It's an affirmation that we are desirable and have 'game'. Men will go out of their way to inflate the # of women they've slept w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:41 PM
2

It seems ridiculous to argue that women should go out of their way to fuck the unfuckables Should men start sleeping with 350 lb women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:25 PM
4

Stop having sex with men who've had more than 10 partners and instead start having sex with men who've had few This is really weird
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:16 PM
7

Looksmaxxers are doing it for the affirmation of other men, not to appeal to women. The only people who would find that attractive are men That's what I find funny about that community; they spend all this time obsessed over improving their looks, and their efforts aren't really even well optimized for what women would actually want in a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:58 PM
3

My top 3 ways for men to improve their face that don't involve ridiculous psuedo science and actually appeal to women (and not idealized hyper-aggressive standards made by men) are: Develop a good skincare routine. SPF based moisturizer in the mornings, cream based one at night. It will do wonders for improving your skin quality and appearance Get a haircut and/or beard trim that suits you. Everyone's got a different face shape, and certain haircuts will frame each shape better. Drink lots of wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:52 PM
2

Could you point to a feminist manhating post?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 05:28 AM
11

If women need security from men, because men are so much more violent (and especially lethally violent) Doesn't that validate women's concerns about tearing down the patriarchy? Why should women acquiesce to a more violent demographic?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:37 PM
0

Forming, a deep, long-lasting relationship with someone
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:19 PM
0

Woman finds me attractive, we talk, she finds me fun to be around, we bond
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:12 PM
–

Is the argument that it's correct to view women as people without thoughts or feelings? Of course a woman has to be attracted to you to want to be in a relationship with you. I mean, would you even want to be in a relationship with somebody that wasn't attracted to you? Men are also the same way That doesn't mean there isn't deep bonding that goes on in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:04 PM
1

I'm 5'7 and have had no issues 'bonding' with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 04:50 PM
1

I don't think the argument has ever been "take it offline and you're guaranteed success" It's moreso that the online dating experience is an incredibly curated and artificial one. You're limited only to the people using said app(s) in your area, and (in the case of a not insignificant # of women on the apps), many aren't even serious about actually meeting matches in person. As the other commenter said, it's also far too easy to be just another guy in her match list.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:55 AM
–

Driver 1 says men should always chase, and that a women can 'dangle' her interest in front of a man (like following him first on IG), but the man must still chase Driver 2 says there's data showing that couples where women pursued first have a higher chance of lasting
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:49 AM
6

The logic is that the mainstream is obsessed with the "manosphere" while we have cucks like Pierce Morgan whose wife openly disrespects and likely cheats on him. What is the correlation? I think the manosphere is toxic and harmful for both men and women. I also think Piers Morgan's marriage is definitely not the kind I'd want to emulate, but it sounds like a problem for Piers Morgan to worry about
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:37 AM
8

And you're able to determine the frequency of sex for each of these couples, and correlate it? Some people cheat even when they're having sex 3-4x a week or more with their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:32 AM
3

Different people have different sex drives. Some couples are ok with once a month. Also, you don't 'deprive' someone of sex. It's not food or water, you aren't entitled to anyone's body, even if you're married to them. In these cases I believe it's ethical to allow the other person to play the field. Or, just break up/divorce? Sure it's easier said than done in a lot of cases, but the relationship is already dead per this point. Unless both parties genuinely want an open relationship All in all,…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:28 AM
20

I'm not flying anyone out that I'm not in a relationship with
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:40 PM
–

Oh brother
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:13 PM
–

What do awkward mannerisms have to do with anything? Is that the barometer for determining if someone's a stealthy serial cheater or toxic and abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:07 PM
–

Why would that not also apply to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:06 PM
62

And what if a man craves connection beyond a hole to fill? How would fucking prostitutes help? And why are you so obsessed with this mythical chad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:08 AM
8

Everyone is experiencing increased loneliness, but it impacts men more generally. Why? Because men have less people to turn to for emotional support. Most male friendships are pretty shallow. Many guys have few if any friends they can confide deep/heavy stuff with. Men use therapy at a far lower rate than women as well. So guys generally depend on women for emotional support. But when they strike out on the dating market, they're generally left without that option. That compounds loneliness to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:11 PM
4

Both genders are experiencing increased loneliness. That's an objective fact. Several factors go into it, like people spending way more times on their phones/computers/tv's. The difference is that men tend to have more shallow friendships with little to no emotional support. So the loneliness for them is compounded. They simply have less (or even no people) to talk to. Further compounded by the fact that women seek therapy at a far higher rate than men. As a result, for a large # of men, their o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 05:37 PM
2

Maybe? I'm sure there are men that actually enjoy being providers
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 07:08 AM
14

for a lot of men to get laid, they have to serve the system in some way so they can get money, which most women have been programmed to be attracted to. So men chase money and material things and put up with all kinds of nonsense just so they can get laid. Sex is also how men are baited into playing the role of 'provider' for women. A provider is more of a relationship role than anything. You don't need to provide for women in order to fuck them. I also don't see why you need to put up with thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 06:59 AM
-1

They are interested in men, they just aren't interested in you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:03 AM
2

I'm in a happy relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 05:00 AM
3

I genuinely think it's a defect if you think the secret to life is fucking prostitutes and ignoring your feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 04:39 AM
4

I'm sorry you've never had a woman into you, but that is so categorically false
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 04:37 AM
4

Reminder that the mod that wrote that definition is not the objective arbiter of what is correct and what is not. Since some of "y'all" have that misconception. I'm not really sure how you'd define 'Blue Pill' in any way other than opposition to the red pill. There is no cohesive blue pill ideology or movement like there is for the red pill. Blue pill only exists as a political metaphor used by TRP to describe people it opposes or thinks accepts mainstream views Also reminder that, after we're r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:14 AM
9

Well incels would agree with many of TRP's views on women So no
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:02 AM
9

It's this new perspective on dating where men are starting to figure out that most women are autosexual-lesbians who are not attracted to the vast majority of men on any level. I think it'll help a lot of men stop pulling their hair out over their circumstances. Do you ever stop and think "I might be the problem"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 08:20 PM
3

Dating apps are not real life. Men outnumber women on apps by a significant margin. They also send swipes far more indiscriminately. The result is that women have a flood of likes and matches, and they simply don't have the time or mental energy to talk to 300 men at a time. So they raise standards and get extra choosy. Have you ever seen what happens to a University after it gets a larger flood of applicants compared to previous years? It's median GPA and SAT scores of admitted students go up
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:40 PM
2

Ok They're highly social, very extroverted, are always out at a function, and know how to be fun around women. Does that sound like a sexual elite (per your words) to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:34 PM
2

I was obviously talking about aesthetic attractiveness. You're taking about a sexual elite that get laid a lot, and it's just guys that are out every weekend and look at least decent
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:31 PM
4

Do you know what 'residual' means?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:26 PM
5

The guys I know that get laid the most are generally not even the most attractive. They're highly social, very extroverted, are always out at a function, and know how to be fun around women. Now obviously you still need to be somewhat attractive, but that's basically having some muscle mass and a haircut/facial grooming that suits you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:24 PM
9

That's a residual effect of women being kept financially dependent on men. When you're not allowed to work, or work in high-paying jobs, you become dependent on men for financial resources. So the only way to elevate your financial class, is to marry a richer man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:52 PM
2

It's also overly curated, and you're only meeting a small demographic of all single women that are on apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 12:20 AM
10

What if and I know this is crazy someone wants a woman for more than just sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 12:17 AM
8

Are you in your 20's and do you have friends you go out with?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:50 PM
14

Ok, let's say I acquiesce to your red pill narrative for the sake of an argument My point still stands. Being incredibly hot does not prevent a man from cheating on you. Jennifer Aniston and Natalie Portman were cheated on
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:43 PM
6

I've definitely seen men monkey branch.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:31 PM
–

Sponsor flights for guys that can't go to a bar and get laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:28 PM
16

I'm using extreme celebrity outliers because these are examples I can point to that can be found. If I tell you Tiger Woods, Eric Benet, and Jay-Z, you know what I'm talking about or can at least look up their cheating scandals. If I tell you Eric from my tax law class, you aren't going to have a clue who I'm talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:16 PM
49

You've constructed an entire fantasy in your head, and then expect us to treat it as a well-established logical rule. Imagine 10 average guys on an island with 10 Victoria's Secret models who are all also mentally well adjusted women. If you pair them off 1-to-1, those guys aren't looking for "better." They've won. They're content with beauty and a good vibe. Like you say this, but then we have tons of examples of male actors/athletes/artists who have pulled some incredibly beautiful and success…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:09 PM
3

You've gotta get off the internet and seek therapy I'm 5'7 and I've had no issues with dating
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:13 PM
10

Being called a douche is one thing Being told that your eggs are no good, that your degree is worthless, and that you aren't doing the right things to attract a man... Is a whole other thing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:06 PM
16

Have you met any attorneys or doctors? It's entirely possible to be proficient enough at a career to make good money, while also being very emotionally underdeveloped
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:03 PM
12

Traditionally men never have cared that women make less than they did. So most of history until recently we have society where guys make more than their wives. But now that women make more than men in this country as they are graduating college at way higher rates now. It’s like women aren’t willing to do the same for men. They still expect men to make more than they do or else he’s a “man child.” Traditionally women were literally barred from earning an appreciable salary, or any salary at all.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 06:59 PM
20

They've also outpaced men in law schools now
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:37 PM
7

Pretty much, it's a residual effect of the patriarchy. Women were conditioned for so long to set expectations at rock bottom and accept nearly anything from a man so long as he was able to provide. Also women were kept out of academia and higher earning professions until well into the 20th century. So both societal expectations and having the cards stacked against them. So when a woman out-earns a man it sort of begets the question "Well, why would I pick you?" Not a great feeling for the guy of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:10 PM
3

Both can be true. It's absurd to call yourself a doctor when anyone in academia knows it's really only used to refer to MD's While also acknowledging that she's receiving latent vitriol and hate that a man making the same post would never get
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter