TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PerformerAbject62 Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by PerformerAbject62 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm sorry but the explicitness of the statement is far more important then some implicit insult to woman. Yeah the overarching theme here is toxic masculinity however that does not take away from the fact that this specific phrase is inherently far insulting to men. Like something can be the product of toxic masculinity but that thing can have worse implications for men then woman. I mean far more dudes are gonna feel body shamed about having a small dick then girls are going to picking up on so…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:08 AM
2

Yes but in context it refers to males. As in men who have small penises are weak or whatever. It does not refer to woman in that same way even if you can use it for a woman. Like if I was to say she has BDE then I'm referring to a woman but the context of the phrase refers to men. Yeah we agree on that part. It inherently though is explicit about its body shaming of males and as such the focus should be on that. Not the implicit woman shaming that you personally see in it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:59 AM
2

No you explained why you think its implied. I think the large majority of people are gonna agree that its used in a male context and really has nothing to do with woman. I think people could be pissed off (Im not, I'm just explaining why no one agrees with your view point) st you because this statement is flat out body shaming males and you are using convoluted logic to get to a place where its also.bad for woman when the phrase and terms are used almost exclusively in a male context. It explici…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:53 AM
3

Well because we know from the actual use of the term that big dick = strong and small dick = weak. The phrase implies nothing about women's lack of a penis, it is literally never used to imply that unlike what it implies for penis size. Its saying if you have a penis it has to be big or youre weak or whatever. That directly relates to men and has nothing to do with women.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:38 AM
3

I think its because the second part is a huge stretch, the phrase is about shaming male genitals and somehow you circle back round to being sexist towards woman. Its kind of ridiculous because everyone knows thats not how its used. Its used to refer to mainly men and not woman, it implies that if you have male genitals they have to be a certain way or that somehow reflects on you as a person. Theres no indication with the use of the phrase that it implies literally anything about woman.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:31 AM
19

I mean you talked about empirical evidence and provided none.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:10 AM
23

So literally says nothing about circumcision. So you can hypothesise but there's no evidence here.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:54 AM
19

What evidence you just made a bunch of claims? Got a source for point 3?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:31 AM
1

I'm sorry but just because there is potential for abuse doesn't mean men shouldn't have protections against hate speech. Thats ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter