TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Personage1 Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by Personage1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Would you really though? Like, are you actually interested in finding out in good faith what feminists think, or do you already "know" that feminists are wrong and so can't possibly have anything worthwhile to say about this? Cause the first thing I thought was "why would you post just a screen cap of an article?" Seems like if you actually wanted to be informative, you would post the actual article. The second thing I thought when I actually read the article was "oh what a surprise, the situati…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/19 07:40 AM
0

From the article Studies Show that Women Sometimes Provoke Men Into Violence August 6, 2014 · by zanzucchi · in Uncategorized · 1 Comment Are you comfortable yet? There is no such study that I know of.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:32 PM
2

Are you trying to say that there should be outrage because "think of if we reversed the genders" or is the "reverse genders" tag supposed to be for another reason?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:46 PM
-1

I mean, if you say "this feminist said this awful thing" then you are making a claim I was responding to that part. But anyway, it seems you finally understand, so yes, we can move on. So wait, you aren't claiming that the feminists (well, some of them you could argue aren't even feminists or at least argue that they have never said they are feminists) said those things and that those things are awful?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:04 AM
-3

I'm just trying to clarify you may choose to say I'm making claims by my headlines. That's your prerogative, but the material speaks for itself. because it seems like you are trying to avoid saying that you are making a claim here. Since you have now said you are making a claim, Oh, I'm definitely making a claim that feminism has a strong core of hatred. we can move on.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:28 PM
-1

So posting quotes of feminists in a subreddit called "fighting feminsts" isn't making a claim about feminsts? I am somewhat curious about the mental gymnastics you have to go through to get there.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:17 PM
0

I mean, if you say "this feminist said this awful thing" then you are making a claim and it's on you to provide the source. At least that's what someone who wants to be taken seriously does.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:06 PM
1

Oh nice, so everything you post is going to have the full context right?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:53 PM
2

[removed] What was in the removed part?
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:01 PM
3

I'm confused how this is feminists supporting the ban Cat Moody, committee member of Edinburgh University’s Feminist Society told The Journal, “My personal opinion is that, women and people of all genders should be able to express their sexuality in any way they choose. Attitudes such as this highlight the stigma and blame attached to sex workers, rather than tackling misogyny and patriarchy which fuel these attitudes.” As a response to the student union's reasoning for banning pole dancing.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:47 PM
1

Anderson County School District Superintendent Don Blome said Thursday that he could not discuss the specific case because of privacy concerns. However, he said all students, whether female or male, are prevented from having bags, purses, satchels and backpacks in the core classrooms like English and math. The bags must be stored in lockers during class time, he said. "We strive to make sure we treat every kid alike and there are classroom rules we expect kids to follow," he told KCTV5 on Thursd…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:36 PM
2

I went on wikipedia and it had this on it.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:28 PM
1

A high sense of entitlement — a core facet of narcissism — disposes women to internalize patriarchal beliefs, such as that women need to be protected by men or that women are naturally good caretakers So when a woman feels entitled she is more approving of benevolent sexism. That would make Women are fine with sexism… as long as it benefits them, says new study. dishonest unless you believed that women tend to feel entitled.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:05 PM
0

When rape charges are dropped, it's not appropriate to call the accuser 'the victim' It is pretty inhuman to suggest someone is a rapist based on an accusation. I'm confused at how you think those two things go together. When rape charges are dropped, it's not appropriate to call the accuser 'the victim' You can most certainly be a victim of a crime and not yet have anyone charged with it, or arrested, or tried and sentenced. Especially with a crime like rape, that is so hard to prove, it's pret…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:01 PM
-3

So, you think it's insulting to men that people say that rapists may think a certain way because it implies men (note: not rapists, not men and women, but men) can't control their urges; and then claim you feminists (a group to which you pertain) don't think that? And you don't see how you contradict yourself? I'm going to go ahead and conclude that it was not irony... When people are victim shaming it is primarily targetting women as men aren't even considered victims in general (I'll get back …
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:07 PM
-2

Huh, I have to apologize, I stopped paying close attention after you said "only a feminist" due to the lack of critical thinking demonstrated by such a statement. After going back over your comment, it doesn't even make sense. Feminists do not argue that men can't control their urges, in fact they argue the opposite. They argue that wearing certain clothes doesn't make a man lose control because they believe men are people. In addition, I see people on subs like 2X discuss female rapists plenty …
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:37 PM
-2

It's ironic that that is the exact opposite of my experience :/
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:18 PM
5

The idea that men are these uncontrollable sex animals is so insulting. Every single time someone says shit like "well what was she wearing," about a rape victim as if clothing takes away our self control, I get so angry.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:33 PM
7

Kinda like how women couldn't be in direct combat situations until recently? That seems like the most obvious explanation.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:50 PM
0

You imply that you don't believe that rapes are more prevalent than false accusations. I assume you hold this belief due to some kind of data and am curious to see it. I mean, you wouldn't hold a belief like that without some kind of data right?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:33 PM
10

Let's just assume that you have any sort of reliable proof for your claim that rapes are far more prevalent than false accusations (i.e. not the old 2-8% of all rape reports are proven as false accusations, therefore all other reports are true adage) I'm interested to see your sources on false accusations being more prevalent than rapes.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:56 PM
2

It's not even a matter of fantasy. There are just times when you want to be viewed as a hot piece of meat and who better than your partner to do so while in bed with you? On the flip side there is a very attractive woman who sits in front of me at work but it would be completely wrong of me to objectify her or treat her differently because of it.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:33 PM
7

A very common misunderstanding about objectification is that it is portrayed as bad. Objectification can be bad, but it can also be good. When you are with a significant other, you are going to be objectifying the hell out of each other during sex and you (should) both want that. The problem with objectification arises when people get unreasonable expectations, treat someone as if their looks are the only thing of worth for them, and/or other things along the same line. A person can be beautiful…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:57 PM
1

Do you have any links to stories? I'd be interested in reading them.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:41 PM
-2

A few quotes from the story. There is no allegation that she was maliciously trying to transmit HIV. Last fall, the Supreme Court of Canada released a pair of decisions that were criticized by HIV groups for authorizing an unjustly wide scope for criminal prosecution — at odds with the evolving scientific evidence about HIV, with most of the lower court decisions to date, and even with the direction previously suggested by the Supreme Court itself. For instance, a person living with HIV can now …
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:46 PM
3

:/ sorry
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:13 PM
3

Doing a very quick google search. After ignoring a foxnews story that didn't list it's sources, I found this and this. Lots of disagreement on numbers but men are always listed as cheating more often. Edit: The foxnews story also said men cheated more, in case anyone tries to bring that up.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:52 PM
1

I'm always interested in learning more. Can you link to examples?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:44 PM
1

According to the article linked, she was put on leave when the investigation began and then she quit before any further action could be taken.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:42 AM
3

Police in Othello have been investigating Scootney Springs Elementary School teacher Lisa Davis, reports KHQ. In late May, another local teacher informed school officials that something fishy might be going on between Davis and the fifth-grader. Her name was published. She hasn't been charged yet by the sound of the article.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:25 AM
2

.....Which one stands out?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:46 PM
1

I was making sure, as safe haven gives the child support, so the comment about it completely fucking over the child had me confused. Also I couldn't tell but I thought either parent would be protected by safe haven which would make this a gender neutral law.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:02 PM
1

Do you mean when it's decriminalized for a parent to leave their child for the state to take care of?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:35 PM
0

I'm curious if anyone has any ideas for alternatives? The fact is that child support is put in place to support the child. It doesn't matter how unfair it is for the parents, the child's interests come first. If it was legal to simply ditch a baby and force only one parent to try and provide for it, that's not good for the baby. The solution seems that we should fight for the state to always make sure that each and every child has enough money. Therefore if the mother or father drops their econo…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:21 PM
1

Wait, so VAWA helps men too? When did that happen?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:12 PM
1

"It puts the burden of proving innocence on the victim" Doesn't that mean people assume the victim is guilty until proven innocent? Doesn't that have absolutely nothing to do with "innocent until proven guilty?"
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:40 PM
2

I had a friend who said she was pro-life. When I asked her about it she said she could never get an abortion but would never limit someone else's choice to do so. I think that makes her pro-choice and feel no problem saying so. In your situation, it appears to be the same. The question I would wonder is why you didn't identify as a feminist. If you say "I believe in x, y, z but I am not a feminist" and I think to myself "but x, y, and z are what feminists believe in" I would at least be curious …
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:20 PM
11

Wouldn't we all. Where in the story did it say that he was screwed over? From the sound of it she was the better off person economically and decided she wanted to have a more active life.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:54 PM
27

I'm curious where you get that it was his money. The only thing I saw was when you take the entire paragraph you quoted there. In quick succession, she had a tattoo and bought a Harley-Davidson motorbike, which she rode across Australia and New Zealand. She taught English in Costa Rica and China, worked in a Zambian orphanage and travelled through Siberia and Mongolia. Now, six years later, she divides her life between the UK and Spain, where she runs a travel agency, Go Granada! The article say…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:44 PM
0

You missed the important question. Would you be willing to be treated like a child for your entire adult life? Would you be willing to only have the opportunities of a child for your entire adult life? I would argue that being treated like an child and only having the oportunities of a child means you are treated worse than an adult.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:36 PM
0

Your argument in the last paragraph is one I have seen often on this sub and I find it interesting. There is this idea that women had fewer rights but on the flip side had fewer responsibilities, which made them equal to men. The thing is, that means that children are equal to adults. Now wait, you say, children are a protected class. We value their lives higher than adults. My response to this is simple. If you were treated the same way as a child now that you are an adult, how would you handle…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:49 PM
-1

Actually rainydayblues's comment just goes to show that s/he didn't understand the article. The author made generalized comments and that's what rainydayblues was responding to. Of course then the author explained her comments which apparently a lot of people didn't read.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:17 PM
0

So I went through the 10 things and explained my thoughts on them. What exactly do you have issues with? Which ones are wrong? I made it pretty clear that some were a little tricky and explained why. What specifically is the problem here?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:34 PM
-4

While this is not as well written as it should be, most of these points are pretty logical. Don't neg-if you disagree with this then I don't like you so we should stop now. Don't lead with your money-as a man I feel like this is also a no brainer. Why would you want to be with someone who you have to show off your money to to impress? Don't put yourself down- as someone who used to do this, yeah, it's not attractive. Don't get handsy - I hope no one has problems with the idea of personal space. …
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:30 PM
2

It's sad that this isn't the highest upvoted comment.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:10 PM
1

This reminds me of people pointing to MSNBC and saying "look, liberals are stupid." Who the hell watches MSNBC? Who the hell takes Cosmo seriously?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:58 PM
2

One of these times I'm going to get that right, although it's kinda amusing to think of what it would mean if "rolls" was the correct spelling.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:35 PM
-1

I'm a male who had an amazing father (and mother). My parents threw gender roles out the window. Yet I identify as a feminist. Wonder what the author would think of me. Probably that I'm a pansy.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:58 PM
1

Yes? That's why I get really angry when people try to make excuses for rapists like what she was wearing etc. It implies that men have no self control. If we have no self control, we should be locked up. I believe we are human beings, however, and therefore we need to stop making these bullshit excuses.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:35 PM
3

If they were married then their assets are shared and therefore she would be financially responsible.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:24 PM
5

The only argument that makes sense is the fear of the wife being held financially responsible for the child that is born. Of course that really just means we need to make sure the donor can't be held liable for the children his donation produces.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:08 PM
1

An organization would never say on thing and do the exact opposite. That would be out of character. Fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:54 PM
2

After hearing all the people who say men can't help themselves in cases of rape, I've suggested that we may as well do this if we are simply mindless animals with no self control.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:58 PM
5

Can you explain how this is clearly about male-on-male rape?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:23 PM
13

How did this take 2 months to sort out? After forensic evidence is taken how does it take 2 months?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:03 PM
2

And thank you? No but seriously, dismissing rapists by using "boys will be boys" is insulting to men because it assumes we are these pigs that have no self control. If you are upset that the author dislikes the "boys will be boys" mindset, I am assuming that you think men are pigs with no self control.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:17 AM
1

Why are you not linking to the site?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:53 PM
6

So the author doesn't like when people treat men like pigs who can't control themselves? That seems like what men should be arguing doesn't it?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:05 PM
1

"In response to that, I think one of the things that feminists have a hard time understanding is the effect of ignoring, silencing, and marginalizing someone, because this is something that feminists have simply never been subjected to." I think this sums up my issue with the men's rights sub quite well.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:37 PM
0

I actually see it flipped, that the ideology is sound but individual feminists still need to work on the gender issues. I agree with the idea behind the second paragraph but I see too much laying the blame on feminism as well as sexist attacks on women to want to support the MRA. However, as someone pointed out elsewhere, if I want to change things perhaps doing so from the inside would be a good start (and yes I think feminism has to change some as well)
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:14 PM
2

"That's the whole idea behind blaming things on "patriarchy". To them, it's not sexist when systemic gender prejudice is toward men, because it's more like self-defense. I've actually heard a feminist compare it to slavery, comparing men to slaveowners and women to slaves, so that women are justified to be against men. The feminists believe in patriarchy more than Don Draper does. They need patriarchy to exist and be relevant. It's their way of being sexist without calling it sexism." This was w…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:52 PM
0

Yes I do see MRAs blaming feminists constantly which is something that makes me sad as I wish I could support men's issues. Your answer is exactly what I wanted though and I thank you for it. Now I need to think about it some.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:42 PM
-2

I can totally see and agree with that. I think I have more of a problem with even the acknowledgement of patriarchy as an underlying problem where I see too many people in this subreddit saying it's all feminists fault and patriarchy is a lie. I feel that this forces feminists to have to defend themselves which results in the cancer patient not getting what s/he needs.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:26 PM
-8

Damn, I mispelled a word. Bummer. Your point is that there are men being discriminated against and it doesn't matter what the underlying cause is because it's wrong. My point is that knowing the underlying cause is good because it allows you to fix the deeper problem rather than the symptom. In both our cases we are saying that these are problems that need to be fixed.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:13 PM
-8

Well now I'm curious. Without simply blaming feminists, what are the other explanations, in your own words please. Also, I keep getting time limits on my posts because I am getting downvoted. If you feel my comments are not applicable to the discussion, then let me know so I can be gone. If you simply disagree with me, then :/
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:03 PM
-12

Yet with the examples you gave me all I could think was "yes, this does stem from patriarchy." "An underage boy is forced to have sex with a woman who becomes pregnant, and a court makes the boy pay child support." Men are the providers (and can't be raped)-patriarchy "A man is beaten by his wife, and the police show up and arrest him because the state has mandatory arrest laws." Men are the violent ones-patriarchy "A father loses custody of his kids to an abusive mother." Women are better at ch…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:50 PM
-6

"But for me, when you say that patriarchy can be compared to slavery is like shitting on all my male predecesors who have been protecting and dying for their families for thousands of generations, and that's why Im giving you a downvote." Just want to point out that you are breaking the code of conduct by downvoting simply because you disagree :/ The interesting thing about the military argument is how women have been fighting to be let into the military, to have an equal chance of fighting and …
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:32 PM
-12

Yes and when you look at the history it is generally men on top (yes there are exceptions). It lays the problems on the men of those days. How is that denegrating to you and me who are here now unless we continue to reinforce those issues? If you reinforce those problems, then it should be denegrating because you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:20 PM
-17

That's like saying "calling it slavery is bigoted towards white people." That's stupid. White people used to be slave owners (yes yes I know it's more complicated. Please don't use exceptions to argue general trends). To say that the discrimination that black people still face doesn't stem at least in part from this past system is wrong. Similarly to say that many of the issues involving gender today don't stem from the Patriarchy we had is wrong to me.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:45 PM
-15

I think if you look at how people treated Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin compared to Barak Obama and George W. Bush you will find that the focuss was on Clinton and Palin's looks whereas it was on Obama and Bush's ideas and personalities. Women are still viewed as objects first and not taken seriously by too many people.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:34 PM
-9

No. I think that using the term "Patriarchical Society" does describe our current situation in which the gender rolls and societal structure is descended from the direct Patriarchy of the past. The way the genders view themselves and each other (which mostly comes from what media tells us) stems pretty much directly from patriarchy and so I feel that it is very applicable to modern times.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:16 PM
-22

See this is a huge issue for me. I've listened to people talk about patriarchy, read the wikipedia page on patriarchy and at no point does patriarchy take away from men's rights issues. The social structures that patriarchy has passed onto us today, such as women should be in the kitchen and men should be at work, or men can't be raped, or feminine = weak while masculine = strong, seem shockingly clear and it boggles my mind that people are trying to argue that it isn't where we get our current …
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:00 PM
0

The democrats tend to be for social welfare and individual rights. I tend to be for these things and therefore usually vote Democrat. It is up to me as an individual to decide arbitrarily if what I perceive as the goals of the Democrats fits my own goals enough (it helps to take it on an person by person basis as there are plenty of idiot Democrats and plenty of intelligent Republicans). That being said there are countless times when I disagree with things that different Democrats do. I really d…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:12 PM
0

I was thinking about it and I think there was a big miscommunication here. You have to believe with the overall goal or message or whatever of the group. However I feel that you can disagree with plenty of things and still belong to the group. One of the things I identify as is a feminist because I agree with what I see as the overarching goals of the movement. However there are countless specific things that I can and do argue about.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:05 PM
-2

I thank you for taking the time to write this. Of all the responses I've been getting, this one that argues against me so well is the one that I appreciate and respect the most. I want to apologize if this gets long but I feel you deserve a more thought out response. I also want to apologize because you reminded me of what I know and should have kept in mind, things are complicated. I wrote a simplified response and on top of that knew that it could ruffle feathers which is what I was going for …
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:46 PM
-3

So because more women vote in a country that is decidedly not representative they must have more power because why else would they continuously vote men into power? As for men advocating for women's interests, there's been countless examples of overwhelmingly men infringing on women's health issues such as abortion.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:29 PM
-3

My point of view is you can belong to a group and disagree with what the group as a whole or individual members of it believe. How much is completely arbitrary and varries from person to person.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:46 PM
-8

Probably, I don't feel like wasting too much time online arguing anonymous people so I pick and choose what to argue. The "hard stuff" requires far more time, thought, and words to properly discuss.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:45 PM
-11

So you are arguing that the patriarchal society was bad for both genders.... I think we agree on this one.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:44 PM
-13

See I can't help but find it ironic that I see this sentence in the MensRights subbreddit.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:43 PM
-4

Considering just how many democrats disagree with him quite often.... I think it would be more comparable to how liberals attack people who explain away Obama's more right wing actions that attack our liberties. While I have not heard anyone come up with a phrase for it I wouldn't be surprised if it was out there.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:42 PM
-4

I'm confused, are we honestly still arguing that if you belong to a group, you aren't allowed to disagree with anything that group or members of that group say? If that's not what you are arguing then this conversation became pointless a long time ago. If you are arguing that then we should just stop because we will get no where with it.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:41 PM
-2

Them too. If you identify as a member of the Democrat party that means you feel they best line up with your views politically. However since no two people anywhere in the world will ever agree 100% it's stupid to say you can't disagree with Democrats about things.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:26 PM
-1

A Democrat is someone who belongs to the Democrat political party. These people (ideally) have looked at all the issues and where the different political parties stand on those issues and have decided that the Democrat party lines up with their personal viewpoint more than the others.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:14 PM
-5

The argument comes from the fact that focussing on punishing false rape reporters creates an environment where victims of rape are less likely to come forward less they be labled a false accuser. False rapes happen at about the same percentage as any other false accusation and far less frequently than actual rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:12 PM
0

How is feminism any different than democrats or the mra? You can certainly belong to any group and have disagreements with that group. It's like how I was a Christian but refused to say the apostles or nicene creed because I didn't agree with them. Hell, as much as I may dislike the Republican party I am all too aware of the fact that many republicans disagree with each other on issues. To think otherwise is naive.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:09 PM
-4

We are at a fundamental difference of opinion here. I believe you can be part of any group and disagree with that group as well.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:06 PM
-2

To some degree yes, but the sheer number of people on here who appear perfectly fine with that mentality is terrifying to me.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:47 PM
-2

The reddit reaction was scary...
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:39 PM
-6

So I can't be a Democrat and disagree with Obama? edit: or you can't be an MRA and disagree with MRAs?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:37 PM
-10

.....you mean like how women make up 20% of the senators in the US and we have never had a female president (or on a personal note having visited DC recently, how the museum exhibit for first ladies was all about their fashion sense and didn't talk about any of the things they actually did). Or you mean how gender rolls in our society are based off of the ones we got from patriarchical societies? No I argue about things that are actually important like how men are influenced by the media just as…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:36 PM
-2

Heh no I know what you meant the first time. I was just amused that rather than address what I said you try to dismiss it by bringing up a potential feminist girlfriend or wife that I may have (which is also an assumption but considering that I only have around a 3% chance of being gay I'll let it slide). Of course if that's not what you are trying to do then I'm really honestly curious why you are interested in my availability.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:22 PM
-4

Particularly her.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:20 PM
-5

And yet when the kids that gangraped the girl in Ohio (I think that was the state) there was a large number of people condeming how harsh the sentence was. Our society tries to not actually let people be accused of rape by making excuses for the rapists and shaming the victims. It's only when the rape is obvious that our society tries to make up for this by crucifying the rapist.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:05 PM
-5

And she is saying that they should be able to have independent thoughts and actually be willing to disagree with her on things.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:01 PM
-13

Which is interesting that it's been my experience personally that feminists can talk about things and I can disagree with them.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 04:32 PM
-8

No, I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 04:10 PM
0

So you went from blindly following a feminist history teacher to blindly following mra after a day? It sounds like you need to do what I did at your age which is shut up and listen (I also found a good way to participate in discussions without knowing anything about them is simply to challenge what you see as the weak points in someone's arguments. Force other people to be open and clear about what they mean and address any counterarguments).
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:58 PM
-1

Man, I was hoping this would be an interesting article but instead we get this. The friendzone issue is that some men only become friends with the sole purpose of getting into a girls pants and/or cuts off the girl when it is discovered that she gasp isn't interested in him sexually. Plenty of people, men and women, hang onto someone they are interested in because they have bought into the bullshit that if you stick with it and do x, y, and z you will get the person you are interested in. Then w…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:48 PM
4

Let's take some quotes from her interview. So do you meet guys who pass the feminist test but then turn out to be disappointments for other reasons? There is a type of feminist guy who is so eager to fall over himself to be deferential to women and to prove his feminist bona fides and flagellate himself in front of you, to the point that it really turns me off. And it makes me sad, because politically, these are the guys that I should be sleeping with! But they’re so serious about their feminism…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:34 PM
-10

I always have issues with the crusade agains false rape accusations. In America we have a culture that desperately tries to make excuses for rapists and attack anyone who reports rape (and then tries to make up for it by crucifying the one or two people who are actually "clear cut" rapists). Yes false rape accusations are bad but so is rape. On top of that rape is far far far more prevelant than a false accusation and only a fraction of rapes even get reported (partly from the stigma attached to…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:14 PM
28

The example you gave was very poorly written and hateful. However the core ideas were still there. The problem with the friend-zone debate is that one half (usually women) mean one thing and the other half (usually men) mean another. The usually women half mean someone who is friends solely to get into another person's pants. It is someone who buys into bullshit that fairy tales feed us that if you stick with someone long enough they will eventually want you. Then the person gets pissed off beca…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:36 PM
0

Actually being raped comes to mind
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:27 PM
2

When do women do that? I'm very curious.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter