TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Personal_Winner8154 Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Personal_Winner8154 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

This is a question of biology. Saying sex is primarily recreational is a blatant denial of the function of our species, and is the reason why so many are "surprised" when the process of intercourse fulfills its intended purpose. You are consenting to the pregnancy by consenting to the possibility by basic logic, as you don't control the chances. You are consenting to both wins and losses when you gamble, it doesn't matter that losing wasn't an intended. If you don't want to lose money, you don't…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:25 AM
9

Your consenting to an act that has the express biological purpose of birthing a child. You are consenting to the potential for a pregnancy, by definition, because that is intrinsic to the act no matter what.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 01:16 AM
15

Rape and incest combined are less than 2% of abortions, but the rarity doesn't stop it being used as an argument
/r/MensRights15/12/24 01:14 AM
1

Genuinely didnt understand, it's the tism I guess lol
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:36 PM
1

Is this a joke?
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:20 PM
1

That won't happen if people do what he's saying genuinely, although noone will because there will always be people like you
/r/MensRights14/12/24 01:48 PM
7

I think we're solving a problem that shouldn't exist here. We live in an age where we stake far too much on ephemeral speech and not on underlying character, and where much of communication is very black and white. I think we just need to bring talking to people in person, in public places where it's safe, back into the mainstream. Have hard conversations
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:45 PM
9

And women? Or are we introducing arbitrary prejudice into a system... Again
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:40 PM
2

And the fact they're convicted more often with longer sentences, and people say nonsense like this which when they believe it becomes self fulfilling prophecy, and that female aggression is more subtle because they're far more sensitive to the threat of retaliation where guys don't care, etc etc. it's almost like bad people arent mostly any gender lmao
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:36 AM
3

We are indispensable, and we need to have value for one another. We need to build more internal structure and internal brotherhood, and strengthen men as a whole. That should be our focus. The world often doesn't care, you are correct. But we do. And we are not the only ones. Dont worry about those who hate you anyway, seek out your brothers
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:56 PM
3

What? Most bad people aren't men lmao
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:26 PM
11

As a Catholic myself, entirely agree.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:47 PM
1

Also, wdym by Christianity being as blue pill as you can get? Or did you mean that specific brand of conservative thought
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:46 PM
1

I'm a traditional Catholic but I don't hate them at all. The position of the church has never been to hate them, it just doesn't view sexuality as part of identity. But I have no problems gay people or any other people, I've met a few friends who are gay in the discord
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:45 PM
2

LMAO. I call it like I see it, and apparently she was expecting noone to notice
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:24 AM
3

Ah yes, because someone with the username"TrustOnlyFemales" on reddit is going to bring a balanced egalitarian view point. Lmao
/r/MensRights11/12/24 08:14 PM
13

They have been taught to be. You can lock them and berate them like the libs do or work to unite them
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:18 PM
7

Shoot me a dm :) I love meeting new people
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:13 PM
16

I'll be your friend bro, I'll even introduce you to my other friends and my brother. We need to get you a real group of friends, because when you have friends like that, you don't need enemies brother
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:59 AM
1

I'm not saying he couldn't benefit from therapy. I'm saying that any human being that I anger probably won't behave optimally, and we have 0 context for what even made him angry. Reddit once again fails to think for two seconds and gather more information before assuming the worst
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:28 AM
1

W. I'm here specifically for the boys, the ladies have their stuff
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:25 AM
1

We're working on that friend. Soon
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:19 AM
-9

No, he responded in anger by breaking them. Some responses to anger aren't a "choice" it's a reflex action out of frustration. Pretending like you maintain your full reasoning function when your angry is incoherent nonsense. Also he didn't say she caused him to break them, read what he actually said
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:54 PM
-1

What did she say? It's hard to understand what's going on, it doesn't have to be all the details but can you elaborate on how you got mad?
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:52 PM
1

Not only that but we don't have enough context. What exactly did she say, because I have a feeling is wasn't mild if he got that mad. Natural reddit midwits jump to conclusions without asking any questions
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:50 PM
3

Being made cause him to break his iPods. "She made me mad, that caused me to break my ipods". He tracing cause and effect, not pointing blame at her, I doubt he thinks she was manipulating him into breaking his iPods lol
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:49 PM
-1

Well discerned, horribly communicated. If your not shouting into the void to have a gotcha moment, you need to learn to be compassionate on the way you acknowledge people's shortcomings. He does see how what he did was abuse, likely because this behavior is a subconscious response that isn't directed toward her but more of a way of expressing his own emotions, and if you read what he said, she got him angry, him being angry caused him to break his iPods. He doesn't know if hes being gaslighted o…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:47 PM
2

Bingo
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:31 PM
1

Learning = intelligence is false equivocation. Intelligence can't be simplified to simple models that create an output from an input and refine input over generations. Learning is not intelligence. Artificial intelligence is what it sounds like, an intelligence that is artificial. Not a glorified function call
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:21 AM
1

Understood, that makes sense. Thanks for the reply
/r/MensRights24/10/24 07:25 PM
2

Ah yes, red herrings. I love illogical nonsense. Is it or is it not slavery? That is the question. Stop whining about something unrelated
/r/MensRights24/10/24 06:10 PM
8

Chattel slavery isn't the only form of slavery, and the relatively severe horrors in America chattel slavery compared to the military doesn't change the fact that military service is still slavery. Your the one uninformed if you think slavery is so one dimensional it only refers to america chattel slavery
/r/MensRights24/10/24 06:09 PM
9

Why not?
/r/MensRights23/10/24 02:29 AM
2

Ah yes, because when someone's insane and are capable of human moments, that means they're beyond help. Peak human reasoning lol
/r/MensRights20/10/24 10:05 PM
5

She said equal treatment. Not equality. And your equity nonsense doesn't equate to reality friend.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:30 PM
1

They're being dramatic dude come on, most will try and save someones life if they can, but people give you hell and put people in more risk because of this nonsense. If me and my partner show up on scene when I was an emt and it was a woman, we both give each other a look. It's a mess waiting to happen, and it puts us at risk of being attacked by white knights, male or female, trying to "defend her", and also has the constant potential to ruin your reputation and career. Why would someone be hap…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:19 PM
2

The whole point is that it doesn't work. But men are treated horribly, told equality is the goal, and that we have all our rights and are privileged.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:42 AM
13

Give this man a medal
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:14 AM
2

Hmm. I thought there was evidence of her orchestration of the murder. She still committed a murder, as did she. But I guess I understand how it could be more complicated. Thanks for sharing
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:29 AM
6

But he should? Sheesh man
/r/MensRights14/10/24 08:34 AM
3

Oof. Didn't realize they were doing that. I thought the women just left for safety but now I realize they get to leave with no consequences. And now they're enjoying their lives elsewhere
/r/MensRights14/10/24 08:25 AM
0

"If a commenter responds to a post with "tl;dr," it expresses an expectation to be entertained without needing to pay attention or to think." - Cambridge Dictionary Not wanting to pay attention or think... Checks out
/r/ExRedPill28/09/24 12:22 AM
4

I think that's just human beings throughout history lol. "This generation is becoming so naive, they don't want to work and they not investing in their education" - Aristotle lol
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 10:47 PM
2

A. Exactly. That was literally my point. I know that it is true to an extent, the problem is that it doesn't really matter. Because nature has far less influence in this than something like say, diet. It's not productive to go "yea it's all natural". Ok? Murder is natural. So what lol. I'm a vegetarian, that's not natural because we're omnivores but it's the correct choice. B. Males work harder yes, this is true, which I say in my own comment C. We don't need them for what? This is my whole crit…
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 10:45 PM
2

Thanks. I'm not and never have been a red pill person, I'm a complementarian, I just care about treating everyone equally and caring for people to contribute to the growth of my species, and it seems more and more that the genders just hate each other. If I'm being honest, I only got on here to look at a programming language theory post and have been doom scrolling for an hour getting more and more frustrated by how callous and dissonant both sides are, and have been for a long time. I guess it …
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 09:48 AM
2

I'm trying to start that movement lol. If we don't, no one else will
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 09:31 AM
1

Interesting. I dont find models like this useful for constructing systems for optimizing reproduction and ensuring the positive adaptation of our species but research like this does make for an interesting read haha. Thanks for the source!
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 09:24 AM
2

The problem isn't reality, the problem(s) are: A. This is an appeal to nature. It being the norm in many of our relatives on this planet doesn't make it optimal, moral, or ethical, and that goes for many things. The premise that we should see this through the lense of nature and biology instead of working from first principles towards a worthy ideal by applying proper diagnostic method tells me that you need to redefine how you think about societal progress. With artificial womb technology, we t…
/r/ExRedPill27/09/24 08:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter