Ah, stalker of posts eh? Now I know how you spend most of your pathetic time. And the “incel” insult is so typical, it’s hilarious. But for a simple-minded fool like yourself, I’m sure that’s the best you can deliver.
Yeah, I know you and your ilk think you should be able to get away with pretty much anything, and that police are “oppressive”, but that’s not how reality operates.
I wouldn’t consider statements of that sort of be “abuse” for either gender. Controlling is something completely different, and there are degrees of it.
No, I was responding to you and your criticism of men who value man caves and may critique safe spaces. The point is that the core concepts of “safe spaces” are inherently different than man caves.
No, it isn’t, and these are two totally separate concepts. Then again, I doubt you have the ability to understand conceptual separation and logical reasoning.
You really are dense aren’t you? That is pure and utter hypocrisy. Definitive hypocrisy. And I’m sure that you have talked to every man on the planet to conclude “men do not mind women invading their spaces” right? One thing is certain, you do not know men. At all.
Lol, cliche insult. And I’m quite certain you do not understand the meaning of hypocrisy. You are applying different standards to two very different situations and your justification is “men invade womyn spaces so it’s okay to not allow them in their spaces.” But it’s evil when men choose to exclude eh?
No basis in reality at all. You are a gynocentric misandrist who likely engages in pegging. See, I can speculate as well loser. And the law is the law. Cry more about womyn being “oppressed.”
Ah, more speculation from a brilliant individual like yourself. Blatant discrimination, which was the key point of the company, is illegal. It is in the US and Scotland. Male spaces do exist but they do not openly state that women are excluded.
No “facts” support your continuous ridiculous assertions. No, “sexual violence” is committed primarily by men against women. You do not belong here, and might be dealt with accordingly if you continue to post.
Modern day feminism means that women can get away with anything. Your previous comment exemplifies this as well as your comments on a post on male rape.
Pipe dream. There is no way females will face any meaningful degree of punishment for such false accusations under our current gynocentric state of affairs.
Except there have been cases where the only evidence is the woman’s testimony, and the case is charged only later to be proven false. See Nikki Yovino.
There would only be a legitimate “threat” of imprisonment if the accusation is actually false and there is evidence to demonstrate it. Thus, fear of this threat would only be reasonable if the individual is aware that she is making a false accusation.
Yes, you speculate on the supposed “harm” that this might cause “victims.” In reality, crimes of false accusations require evidence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict. It won’t be sufficient to just show that an acquittal, a no charge, or a Nolle Prosequi.
The fact is, the news propagandizes gynocentrism. Despite the fact that more men in these circumstances have ALWAYS died significantly more than women, the media focuses on a slight increase in female deaths in one year.
And a man has to pay 18 years of child support and faces a jail penalty if he cannot for a child he may not want. And he might have to pay even if he was imprisoned and not working.
All biased sources. And again, my point still stands, the most common form of female circumcision is essentially a pin-prick compared to male circumcision which is far more prevalent.
Yeah, of course you don’t have a source on what “they” do. What they actually do is comparable to a lesser procedure than circumcision in a majority of cases.
Defamation suits arise in CIVIL court. These cases, if charged by the state, arise in CRIMINAL court. And they’re only “rare” in your mind. Why are you even here?
A lot of baseless speculation without any citation to any law. Nice job. Individuals can sue for defamation without this law in effect. That’s civil law. Are you still with me? This is a criminal offense which requires intent. So there has to be evidence that the false accuser has the malicious intent to falsely accused before the case proceeds. See, now that’s legal expertise.
Nice source you provided. Oh wait, you didn’t. Just feminist “statistics.” And what does this have to do with the point of this post at all? Feminist propaganda. That is what you are here to spread.
“Rapists have more rights than the victims.” Yeah, I’m sure you have the evidence and legal “expertise” to make such a statement right? With your law degree from a cereal box?
