Peterowsky Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	CHINA: Man bails on bill after woman brings 23 friends to blind date That's Bride price actually. Dowry is the share that the bride would inherit from her parents but would give up by marrying into another family, given on her marriage. And dower is the share of stuff that belongs only to the bride, as a "if your husband screws the pooch, you still have your own stuff". One can have all 3 in the same marriage.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/10/20 09:58 PM
1	Newly hired Boston University professor tweets “White masculinity isn’t a problem for America’s colleges, white masculinity is THE problem for America’s colleges.” They want equal treatment, even if it's not the ideal treatment. Even then, most MRAs I've seen are asking for one or the other, because either situation diminishes the inequality in rights, and once you bridge that gap, you can fight from equal footing for what you believe is right. Since it's unlikely they'll be able to strip one gender or minority from the special treatment they get, they try to get the same treatment tho both show how ridiculous it is (for some reason people clearly agree th…	/r/MensRights	12/05/15 01:35 PM
8	Newly hired Boston University professor tweets “White masculinity isn’t a problem for America’s colleges, white masculinity is THE problem for America’s colleges.” Just because those portrayals are banned doesn't mean that they necessarily should be, and that men should follow suit That's kind of the point. It doesn't really matter if that action is the best way to handle a situation, the fact that it is only used by one group, and dismissed as silly when another group points out that it doesn't get the same treatment is the issue. The propaganda and the attitude regarding it is a way to reinforce the stereotype that men don't need more rights, or protecti…	/r/MensRights	11/05/15 01:12 PM
13	If my husband was home, he would have been arrested. Considering those phone calls are anonymous and protected, and considering the officers don't really have to tell the victim or the suspect much of anything during the investigation, it's easy to see how that can be abused. "Someone thinks they heard something" as probable cause might protect a lot of people, but it can harm a few others quite badly.	/r/MensRights	06/05/15 05:52 PM
13	If my husband was home, he would have been arrested. Sad, but that's what we get often enough.	/r/MensRights	06/05/15 05:42 PM
3	You are doing it right. It's 2015, not 1915 (X-post from /r/pics) It's easier to criticize a problem than provide a solution to another.	/r/MensRights	25/04/15 04:13 AM
3	You are doing it right. It's 2015, not 1915 (X-post from /r/pics) Nothing wrong with that. Just reminding those of us who have seen it before, of where it was.	/r/MensRights	24/04/15 04:17 PM
11	You are doing it right. It's 2015, not 1915 (X-post from /r/pics) Wasn't this posted here, almost a year ago? And now someone put it on /r/pics ? http://www.reddit.com/r/no_sob_story/comments/33pkkf/woman_with_sign/cqn55li Editing because I am too lazy to make my own karma decay post.	/r/MensRights	24/04/15 02:57 PM
7	Anger after white people and men are banned from 'anti-racism' rally at British university by its own student union DIVERSITY OFFICER I don't think those people on the internet understand what racism is.	/r/MensRights	23/04/15 12:45 PM
0	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! You are the one drawing implications and generalizations from statements of small sample sizes, while criticizing that very behavior. Will you also say that we cannot conclude that europeans are worse at sprinting than sub-saharan africans because there's just not enough european olympians to compare them to? Actually, no. We have historically more European Olympians than sub-saharian ones, and even in modern sports they represent a significant amount of participants, though not of winners. What…	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 06:37 PM
3	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! Women are good at lying to themselves to protect their own ego Humans in general are, even if we don't like admitting it. Though I remember reading a while back that it is exactly because we make an excuse as to why we lost that we keep going, that we can keep in the game trying to best that excuse, our own disadvantages and the advantages of others. On the other hand we also get people who just say "it's unfair!" and leave it at that, or crusade to level the playing field to the lowest common d…	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 05:02 PM
1	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! I wish we had more data with a large sample size. Unfortunately we don't, so we need to content ourselves with opinions and some very speculative studies.	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 04:57 PM
0	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! By this logic you could grab a study claiming that most people are over 7 feet tall by using a sample size of two seven foot tall folks. Contrasts with: what is claimed here is the equivalent of taking some hypothetical sport S, observing that 98% of people playing it are over 7 feet tall, then claiming that having found 2 players under 7 feet somehow destroys the assumption that there is something inherent in S that makes people over 7 feet tall better at it I would imagine that since there are…	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 04:40 PM
0	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! That is part of the problem. Most chess players are male. Those who have it as a hobby, or as a profession are predominantly male. Finding female chess players that can rival the best male chess players, given that the sample to pick them from is smaller by nature of less females playing chess is quite hard. That being said, I don't know if they don't play because they don't like it, because they and others believe wouldn't be good at it, because it's a male dominated field or whatever reason.	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 04:05 PM
2	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! You are confusing empirical evidence of "people can be over 7 feet tall" which you would have, with the conclusion of "most people are over 7 feet tall". Drawing statistical conclusions with a small sample size is poor practice, but that's not what is claimed here.	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 04:01 PM
1	Apparently it's sexist to say women are worse at chess. But its OK to have separate women's tournament, even though Chess doesn't involve physical prowess! Well female players do represent a lot less of the total. Why they choose not to go into chess is however, their own problem and should not be an excuse for preventing men from playing them.	/r/MensRights	20/04/15 03:59 PM
1	Are we (r/MensRights) deteriorating to feminist standards? Have you calmed down now? Damn near every post here has some misogynistic comment pop up somewhere. They are usually down voted or deleted by the mods, but not always. And it sure doesn't' have to be "All women are terrible people who want to enslave men" to be misogyny. Sometimes it's the very type of comments noted by /u/entropiczy that can negatively affect the entire movement and falsely mark everyone here as a woman hater, and then it's easy to dismiss us. Blowing up over what you think was…	/r/MensRights	15/04/15 02:45 AM
1	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. The people accused don't exist! The accusation was a hoax. So you're getting this worked up over a women who accused imaginary men of raping her in an imaginary house, because you NEED to know who she is so you can stay away from her and it's your right to know that so that you can promote freedom and democracy and the greater good, by discriminating the people who are either victims of unproven violence, false accusers or mentally insane, doesn't seem to matter which. Oh, and anyone ever accuse…	/r/MensRights	08/04/15 07:02 PM
1	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. You know what, besides being awfully belligerent and somewhat disrespectful, you're not really making much sense to me. All anyone said is we need to know the identities of parties that make criminal complaints and those accused of crimes I said their status as complainants and suspects should be public. I'd wager you would be ok if your face showed up in national television as the primary suspect for a series of gruesome murders of entire families with extra cruelty to the family pets and child…	/r/MensRights	07/04/15 04:15 PM
1	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. You don't seem to have any actual reasons for the government to do it's business in secret, or any actual reasons to suppress evidence in an investigation. Ok, first off, investigations are usually conducted in secrecy, so the person being investigated can't make evidence "vanish". They have a right to know about everything once there is a trial where they are being accused of something. Revealing who is being investigated for what and who is the victim before there is a trial is quite backwards…	/r/MensRights	06/04/15 08:41 PM
1	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. On the unlikely case that a part of what she said was true it is not a good thing to out a possible victim, even if she did commit a non-violent crime by falsely accusing those men. When someone claims to be a victim, even if their story doesn't make any sense, the police should when possible investigate. False accusers can't really do much after they have been shown to be lying. The damage is done, but people, particularly those in positions of power become wary of trusting them (keep in mind t…	/r/MensRights	06/04/15 03:21 PM
1	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. Ok, that stuff is batshit insane territory. The information I had at the time of commenting was she accused 7 guys of raping her with a very inconsistent story, then this article. Hence the last sentence.	/r/MensRights	06/04/15 01:17 AM
2	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. In the (apparently very likely) case that she maliciously lied to screw the lives of those men it's not in the judiciary or police's best interest to out her, on the off chance that she is a victim or the much more likely case that she has some mental/psychological disorder.	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 10:15 PM
18	Jackie, the false rape accuser in Rolling Stone appears to have made at least one other false rape accusation. But the accused man was imaginary. She claims she was raped by a third year student whose alleged name does not match that of any student, whose alleged number belongs to an "anonymous online texting service". No one knows that student, no one seems to have met that student. I don't know... Maybe she was raped by someone passing for a student that deceived her. Maybe she lied about the whole deal. What I do know is that we have is a half-told rape story coming from someone who would later claim to be raped by 7 people, accusing t…	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 06:37 PM
4	TIL that early feminists would attempt to humiliate men who were not soldiers during WWI. Ah, I was trying to find the person who would play the "No True Scotsman". There is always someone who does it. And there are always at least a few comments dedicated to breaking down that fallacy and pointing out that it doesn't mean every single feminist out there is bad. A quick search for it in any of the dozens of other times this or any other piece of news that portrayed feminist movements or aspects of feminist movements in a bad light will show some important discussion made on that topi…	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 06:18 PM
2	Female domestic violence: women are sexually abusing men by super-gluing their genitals whilst they sleep. Imagine if men were gluing their wive's labia lips together. That is accurate. It's use in the article greatly downplays socially unacceptable behavior because it is a neutral term being used to describe negative actions, as if trying to justify breaching one's trust in regards to one aspect of social behavior because that person breached their trust in another aspect of social behavior, but the term is accurate nonetheless.	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 06:07 PM
1	Female domestic violence: women are sexually abusing men by super-gluing their genitals whilst they sleep. Imagine if men were gluing their wive's labia lips together. Not as much as one would think. The male body is very efficient at draining blood from the penis when in pain/danger. There are plenty of guys living with "chastity cock cages" out of their own accord and they don't seem to have much trouble with morning wood. Still, that would likely make one freak out. Not much can be done in those cases.	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 05:51 PM
7	Female domestic violence: women are sexually abusing men by super-gluing their genitals whilst they sleep. Imagine if men were gluing their wive's labia lips together. Most common scenario? They believe at the time of their marriage, against probability, biology/neurochemistry/psychology regarding attraction and interest, and both their own previous experiences and experiences of others that they will indeed still be attracted to one another after N years, and have a great, satisfying life without the little idiosyncrasies gaining greater and greater weight over time to the point where they just can't stand that anymore. Then they meet someone that is either v…	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 04:30 AM
14	Female domestic violence: women are sexually abusing men by super-gluing their genitals whilst they sleep. Imagine if men were gluing their wive's labia lips together. I'm going to skip the "violence is bad regardless of gender or method used to perpetrate it" speech because we all know it by now, and hopefully agree with it. Instead, I'll focus on how superglued skin is bad and injury-causing for people that freak out and a nuisance for people that keep their calm. This is knowledge you might need one day, not because you expect someone to superglue your genitals, but because a very large number of situations may lead to one needing to remove superglue from t…	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 04:21 AM
22	If you’ve been following the media aftermath of Reddit CEO Ellen Pao’s failed discrimination lawsuit, you may be forgiven for thinking that Pao won. She didn’t, but the mainstream media has nevertheless spent this week spinning the tale of a righteous crusader fighting against a sexist status quo. Well, she did fight the status quo. By suing one of the companies that hired the most women in the field for firing her after years of reports showing that her performance was average or worse and that she was generally an unpleasant person to work with. From what I saw the case was mostly centered around her idea that she was fired for being a female and that she didn't get the promotions her male co-workers got with similar levels of performance again because of her gender (nothing to do with …	/r/MensRights	05/04/15 04:06 AM
1	Feminist reddit CEO loses gender discrimination lawsuit Some people might have missed the "2000" part of the title. The nostalgia critic summed it up pretty well: "Has half of what made it good, forceful comedic sidekicks, practically nothing new to offer and wasn't something that the fan base ever demanded in the first place to begin with."	/r/MensRights	31/03/15 07:59 PM
1	Feminist reddit CEO loses gender discrimination lawsuit The majority of men between ages 20 and 34 are single. It's popular alright.	/r/MensRights	31/03/15 07:50 PM
1	Amazon UK remove 'slap her' mugs, yet continue to sell 'Boys are Stupid, Throw Rocks at Them' products. I worry about people that are offended over being bossed around by a shirt.	/r/MensRights	23/03/15 07:05 PM
16	Amazon UK remove 'slap her' mugs, yet continue to sell 'Boys are Stupid, Throw Rocks at Them' products. So it's ok to say you should throw rocks at boys because they're stupid since it's light hearted but saying you should slap a bitch is always bad taste? Rocks hurt a lot more than slaps, If we assume for a moment that the people getting or seeing those would be compelled to do what the phrase tells them to, I'd much rather not get hit by a rock, light hearted throw or not, and if we assume people are the least bit reasonable, EDIT: why is an inanimate object telling you to slap a bitch hard is s…	/r/MensRights	23/03/15 07:00 PM
1	Question: Why is it that feminists NEVER list "female" as a privilege while almost everything else is? (men, white, CIS, Christian, Straight, ...) Is that a problem with feminism, though, or with the justice system That goes both ways though doesn't it? Near any problem feminists are against could be attributed to the area that problem is in. And random people usually aren't responsible for major politics, it's the ones guiding them or using them as fodder that are.	/r/MensRights	14/03/15 03:44 PM
1	Question: Why is it that feminists NEVER list "female" as a privilege while almost everything else is? (men, white, CIS, Christian, Straight, ...) Yeah... except the females more often than not walk away with a slap on the wrist. Sure, there are males that get that preferential treatment too, but they don't seem to be a majority. The opposite however...	/r/MensRights	13/03/15 05:05 PM
1	Question: Why is it that feminists NEVER list "female" as a privilege while almost everything else is? (men, white, CIS, Christian, Straight, ...) Of course no organisation with half a brain cell distributed over it's members would say "We should keep mutilating their genitals!". But most of them don't say anything about it. They act like it's supposed to be that way, like it's only logical and since it has been done for so long, why the fuss about it now? (sounds familiar? it should)	/r/MensRights	13/03/15 05:03 PM
12	Fuck this oversimplified, condescending shit. It doesnt help anyone. Still, the fear of violence when walking down the sidewalk, physical or otherwise isn't exclusive to women.	/r/MensRights	09/03/15 03:49 PM
1	Women have fits because U. of Va. sororities are banned from frat parties this weekend, but the ban is the only logical response to the "rape culture" hysteria No True Scotsman. But indeed the extremely vocal radical groups are not necessarily representative of the majority of any given ideology. It is however VERY tiring to have to do the whole "explain why you think this group that labels themselves as A and is often accepted by other members of A as a subset of it, often participating in events that spread it's doctrine and taking credit/compliments without anyone that isn't the "evil", "oppressive" people from B complaining should not be called A i…	/r/MensRights	30/01/15 11:19 PM
0	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million Some civil law judges recognize that even without a shared residence. Few, but there is a doctrinaire current in that direction and they seem to be growing number as the years pass, in no small part because people don't often have any proof of residence, even when they lived together for a decade (I work with this kind of thing every day, one of the judges requires actual freaking evidence, the other is much, much more flexible with what constitutes proof and much, much less experienced in telli…	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 03:48 AM
43	UK: There are about 100 Male midwives in the UK. They are discriminated against and there was a great deal of opposition to them even being allowed to be midwives. In the UK 90% of nurses are female. Where is the Government campaign for more male nurses, midwives and GP's? There is however the issue of nurses though. What's the excuse then? Being dismissive of problems (even if we understand why they are there) doesn't really help further the cause in any way.	/r/MensRights	03/11/14 12:25 PM
1	15 Year Old Boy Commits Suicide In Adult Prison. He Was Charged And Convicted As An Adult At The Age Of 13. Note that murder has the largest penalty of any crimes in the majority of penal systems (with death penalty in some), is one of the less common crimes (particularly when opposed to patrimonial crimes) and is usually a crime of passion in that most murder cases aren't someone killing a random stranger, but someone who pushed them beyond the edge over the period they knew each other (usually years) or over some big falling out of them. So not only do less of them get out, they take longer to get o…	/r/MensRights	25/09/14 01:55 PM
1	15 Year Old Boy Commits Suicide In Adult Prison. He Was Charged And Convicted As An Adult At The Age Of 13. Pretty much any country in the world has a recidivism rate near 2/3rds. A handful of alternative programs boast about better results, but their studies are almost all short-term, with a small sample size and come with the hype that surrounds each "everyone else that did this before did it wrong" announcement (not to say that people before were right, just that we have an inherent drive to prove our views and ways are better than those before us). Oh, and they normally focus on non-violent crimes…	/r/MensRights	24/09/14 02:32 PM
1	15 Year Old Boy Commits Suicide In Adult Prison. He Was Charged And Convicted As An Adult At The Age Of 13. I think the issue here is that people can't differentiate between a theory (on rehabilitation) and a poor implementation of that theory. The implementation sucks. No doubts or questions there. It does so most everywhere in the world. The theory backing it up however is questioned because the implementation is poor and that's like buying a $1,99 watch and saying whoever decided the idea of a watch was good is an idiot because your watch doesn't work as it should. Or getting some incompetent idiot…	/r/MensRights	24/09/14 02:32 PM
7	I've lived my life as both male and female and have seen how each gender is treated first hand as both: AMA Not just a U.S. thing. In most of the world pink is associated with females in general. Though that has been gradually changing and men can now wear some of the more discreet tones of it without dealing with as much stereotype as a decade ago (depending on the environment you can pass off a pink shirt without anyone commenting on it- to your face at least).	/r/MensRights	20/09/14 07:46 PM
1	"Feminism is for everyone" Now that was uncalled for, much like the comment above yours.	/r/MensRights	18/08/14 12:30 AM
1	UK: Woman who starved her four-month-old baby to death escapes jail (but in another similar manslaughter case a guy was sentenced to eight years this month) Yeah, but apparently it does not protect the people who expose issues with the government, just "horrible people".	/r/MensRights	23/07/14 01:41 PM
6	Mexican Supreme Court of Justice rules: "a mother has no more right than a father to the custody of their children" And the first constitution to guarantee social rights and unfortunately still one of the few to guarantee that there is no such thing as a prohibited book in it's jurisdiction even if gasp someone that read that book committed a crime via a method described in the book.	/r/MensRights	01/06/14 10:33 PM
1	I am for Men's Rights but... No fear is eternal mate.	/r/MensRights	01/06/14 10:03 PM
1	I am for Men's Rights but... Yeah... no opportunity that comes from fear is a good one. It just makes a bigger mess further down the line when people want revenge and reparations.	/r/MensRights	01/06/14 04:40 AM
3	Is this real? Apparently you can build one in the premisses	/r/MensRights	17/05/14 01:34 PM
7	Is this real? A bear.	/r/MensRights	17/05/14 01:27 PM
1	Creep shamed, because I wouldn't let a woman return a sweater It means "promiscuous woman". Big difference there (the difference between liking something "too much" and having sex with every example of it that comes along). In modern society it also is frequently applied to men to describe them as "promiscuous". Not that there's anything wrong with promiscuity (except the far greater chance of contracting and spreading sexually transmitted diseases and bringing about unwanted pregnancies), but it's not generally a desired quality in a possible mate, so cal…	/r/MensRights	17/05/14 04:54 AM
2	Somehow I actually changed feminists' POV..... (or a brief story about Solange) Then change the analogy to "wears fancy suit and rolex in unknown area, while intoxicated and alone/accompanied by random stranger". If you get robbed it's because someone decided to rob you. Wearing jeans and a sweater with that casio watch might not have discouraged them but I'll be damned if it's the same. Being conscious of your surroundings and acting/dressing appropriately to minimize risks and maximize profits is a skill that far too many people lack. Showing up to a cocktail party in jea…	/r/MensRights	13/05/14 03:22 PM
0	Somehow I actually changed feminists' POV..... (or a brief story about Solange) So... can we get yet another reductio ad absurdum argument in here trying to make it look like we are blaming the victim? Is that what this sub has turned to?	/r/MensRights	13/05/14 03:10 PM
1	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? We choose what we do. If you think our genes or hormones do that for us, then I can't really say anything to convince you otherwise. We have examples everywhere of people that defy social expectations, the deterministic approach to gender was largely supplanted by the notion that we all have free will, even if it's influenced by an extremely long list of factors that range from hormones, to upbringing, to underlying emotional circumstances, to a long list of disorders caused or exacerbated by sa…	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 03:29 PM
1	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? So, you're referring to anecdotal experience, heavily related to social conformity and expectations of social behaviour as facts that justify our biological gender defining major personality traits, while having no hard evidence or scientific analysis to back you claim. I feel your social life is quite restricted if you believe that. There are all kinds of people out there that don't act any one given way because they came out of their mothers with a penis or a vagina. Please don't take this as …	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 02:57 PM
1	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? Enlighten me. And not via social constructs of what is expected from a gender, but showing me research of biological factors based on our gender that dictate our personalities.	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 02:47 PM
3	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? Yoga pants for women are released: "Great, now we're going to have those blobs walking around in skin-tight clothing, showing their fat, unshapely, cellulite ridden asses." See? It's not sexist per se, blobs are not representative of the majority of the female population, much as rapists are not representative of the majority of the male population. But I am willing to bet most women would take issue with it. That's kind of the problem here, you go from general statement to statement that only r…	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 02:42 PM
0	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? We don't have certain PERSONALITY traits because of our gender. We have free will, we can choose what we do, even if we can't choose what genitalia we get on our birth.	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 02:34 PM
4	Is this sexist or am I blowing it out of proportion? Poe's law is quite frustrating at times. I never know whether to laugh or look down and shake my head in disappointment.	/r/MensRights	09/05/14 02:28 PM
1	Don't do this. Seen in a NYC Library bathroom. But 138 is one of the less scary ones...	/r/MensRights	03/05/14 04:26 PM
2	A woman complained that she "couldn't use the weight room because of the men and that's not fair." Now the gym might have women only hours in the weight room. But that is a key element in all societies, even for animals. Everyone realizes it in one level or another too, but they only feel conscious about it (often in a negative way) when someone points it out (very often in a judgemental tone).	/r/MensRights	06/04/14 03:09 PM
1	A woman complained that she "couldn't use the weight room because of the men and that's not fair." Now the gym might have women only hours in the weight room. Done evenly: men-only gym from 22:00 to 07:00, women only gym 07:00- 10:00, 11:00-13:00, 18:00-22:00. Yup, okay with it.	/r/MensRights	06/04/14 03:04 PM
7	A woman complained that she "couldn't use the weight room because of the men and that's not fair." Now the gym might have women only hours in the weight room. After an expensive judicial battle that might be true.	/r/MensRights	06/04/14 03:00 PM
3	A woman complained that she "couldn't use the weight room because of the men and that's not fair." Now the gym might have women only hours in the weight room. It's not really "women only" since men can join. It's just marketed towards women and no men joins because of that (also because "that creep that shows up in the women only gym" is most certainly shunned).	/r/MensRights	06/04/14 02:58 PM
2	A woman complained that she "couldn't use the weight room because of the men and that's not fair." Now the gym might have women only hours in the weight room. It's not really enforced in most places since the majority of people don't give half a damn about it, but it is quite illegal yes.	/r/MensRights	06/04/14 02:56 PM
1	Tumblrinas post wildly inaccurate graph about rape statistics, gets destroyed by reality. (x-post from /r/tumblrinaction) Point taken. "I am unhappy because of some injustice, but hey, me someone else aren't the victims of more injustices. That's good enough I guess" Never met anyone with that thought process unfortunately.	/r/MensRights	20/03/14 12:47 PM
1	Tumblrinas post wildly inaccurate graph about rape statistics, gets destroyed by reality. (x-post from /r/tumblrinaction) There is the whole humans, mistakes thing going on there, not much consolation but then again what consolation can we offer the victims of those that went free?	/r/MensRights	20/03/14 03:39 AM
2	Tumblrinas post wildly inaccurate graph about rape statistics, gets destroyed by reality. (x-post from /r/tumblrinaction) Intimidate those that can be intimidated into not committing crimes, correct those who committed crimes and can be corrected, remove the others (unintimidated, uncorrectable) from society (no one seems to be opposed to keeping locked up those who fail to function according to the laws until they do - whenever that may be).	/r/MensRights	20/03/14 03:38 AM
2	According to Google Search, the streets are 100% safe for men, and men are the evil perpetrators of street harassment everywhere. Yeah, it should say "my personalized google search shows me different results that confirm my previously established opinions" if it wanted to be honest. That's kind of what confirmation bias means. As to a search engine giving opinions and facts, well, it's showing you what you want to see, namely opinions and facts related to what you searched.	/r/MensRights	28/02/14 05:53 PM
6	According to Google Search, the streets are 100% safe for men, and men are the evil perpetrators of street harassment everywhere. Google customizes your results. It links more to stuff that is similar to what you usually click on. It's algorithm carries an enormous confirmation bias.	/r/MensRights	28/02/14 05:09 PM
1	"Bathing in Male Tears" and other man-hating t-shirts touted as feminism. Some of those are pretty funny/ actually send a reasonable message. Some of cringe-worthy pieces warning us to stay the hell away (we're intimidated by their assertiveness and confidence, so we go home to cry on our fedoras).	/r/MensRights	28/02/14 03:41 PM
1	"Bathing in Male Tears" and other man-hating t-shirts touted as feminism. "No opinions besides my own matter."	/r/MensRights	28/02/14 03:38 PM
1	attempted rape = rape, but only if a girl is the victim. (The White House Council on Women and Girls) [Pg. 1, Fn. 1] threat of bodily harm A very incomplete one if I may add. Bodily harm is hardly the only thing you can threaten someone with. But in this case I suppose it's enough.	/r/MensRights	09/02/14 12:10 AM
2	attempted rape = rape, but only if a girl is the victim. (The White House Council on Women and Girls) [Pg. 1, Fn. 1] You mean to say your legal system does not have a crime category of "to threaten"? TIL.	/r/MensRights	08/02/14 07:33 PM
3	The representations of the female body in video games and movies are unrealistic and unattainable Far from it. There are quite a few doctors willing to prescribe proper doses of the stuff, with nutritional care and exercise, to healthy adults. It ends up being no more harmful or risky than a surgical procedure to change one's appearance. They are however still doing something that is illegal in most cases and can make it impossible for them to further practice medicine hence why they are harder to find than some guy selling horse steroids in the parking lot of the gym. The media (and society…	/r/MensRights	27/01/14 04:05 AM
2	The representations of the female body in video games and movies are unrealistic and unattainable This subreddit is less about men's rights than showing the flaws in modern feminism, much like modern feminism is less about equality and more about double standards. (insert long rambling speech on how it's hard to pitch an unpopular opinion to a crowd that's all to happy about maintaining their status quo and easier to vilify them and their actions, especially if they are indeed very, very petty : refer to any of the first two generations of feminists that actually were trying for equality or …	/r/MensRights	27/01/14 01:25 AM
-2	The representations of the female body in video games and movies are unrealistic and unattainable despite their obviously more harmful side effects Sorry, but do you have the slightest idea of how many complications can occur during and after surgery? How taxing it is on the body? Why it costs so much and why people are given instruction on what to do weeks before and after the procedure is complete, with regular check-ups to see if it all goes the way it should? Controlled steroid use is actually far less dangerous and harmful. (Which is why we prescribe it to waning old people and those wh…	/r/MensRights	27/01/14 12:52 AM
4	Why Should I Support Mens' Rights? people really do have a capacity to be absolutely disgusting where child custody is involved Likely because of child support. Scummy people don't usually care about their offspring, but rather the benefits having that child's guard might bring.	/r/MensRights	14/11/13 05:54 PM
0	Opting out: Women can have an abortion, some men say they should have a choice over parenthood too That was my second paragraph, just with (far) better wording. Giving the guy a choice over acting like a parent (good or not) since after the initial act he has no power over whether or not the child is born because that would violate rights, many of them. Still, it would need to be properly regulated and regulating it seems like some major pain in the ass (probably less than child-support for 18 years but still quite a herculean task for whoever considers themselves smart enough to make it fair…	/r/MensRights	10/11/13 04:07 AM
1	Opting out: Women can have an abortion, some men say they should have a choice over parenthood too The fact that it is hard to reverse it later on if you want to have kids (sperm can still be extracted directly from the testicles since they never stop producing, but it king of requires a needle going into your ball-sack, which I suppose isn't a problem if you are considering a vasectomy). Other than that and the fact that to keep the population people need to reproduce (social reason) and that there might be regional regulations, hospital/clinic policies, and some influential people with back…	/r/MensRights	10/11/13 02:40 AM
0	Opting out: Women can have an abortion, some men say they should have a choice over parenthood too I think a big part of it is because the woman carries the child in formation, and anything done on her body against her will violates her rights to her physical integrity, freedom, and whatever other item from the very long list of essential human rights you can put in there. That being said, men should have some form of control, and I am leaning towards them having the option to involve themselves (monetarily or otherwise) in the wonderful new life their only action towards creating was stickin…	/r/MensRights	10/11/13 02:19 AM
2	"Father Jailed For Allegedly Hiding Daughter From Mom" ... my uncle's story is finally getting media attention! Habeas Corpus. "Innocent until proven guilty". (Should be treated as innocent, and that should mean not being jailed before being convicted unless there is is a risk of destroying evidence, fleeing or coercing/threatening/hurting witnesses/whoever might be involved in the process) Ethics committee, watchdog associations and others exist to prevent and correct cases of abuse or improper conduct. But yeah, you're pretty much screwed unless you have some major leverage (money, friends in high place…	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 05:44 PM
10	Stop womens quotas in EU It simply isn't normal that the heads of the governments are not 50% women, I don't know why people have such problems with the idea what 50% of the population be represented by 50% of the population. How many women decide to go into politics again? Nowhere near enough to represent 50% of the available positions? Obviously because they would not be elected,and decided to spend their time in other activities that reinforce the stigma they feel have a better return, right? It doesn't even come dow…	/r/MensRights	03/09/13 04:31 PM
1	What the fuck did I just read? Where I live the double bladed razors go for around $7-9 each, triple bladed ones go for anything between $11-19. I could use a double bladed cartridge (or disposable razor) 5-6 times before it started cutting the skin instead of the hair, 6-7 times with a triple bladed one. I bought a double edged razor, 5 blades cost me between $1,65 and $2,30 now and I can use each 2-4 times depending on the quality of the blade. The ONLY downside is it now takes me 5 minutes to shave and I can't really shave…	/r/MensRights	18/08/13 08:25 PM
1	What the fuck did I just read? Now that is nice. 1.I suppose men can charge the girl for the gym, and the deodorant, and the aftershave, and the supplements and the massages to help their sore muscles after getting in shape for her, and the barber (if applicable) if she thinks she spending hundreds of dollars a month on her appearance is an excuse not to pay her share of the dinner. 2.And lest not forget how she sending gifts to the man's family to please them, and make them like her better should also be an excuse for her no…	/r/MensRights	18/08/13 08:08 PM
5	"I'm a girl, we can do that..." was in line for a bar Found your problem right there. Bars that have lines usually need to let more females in so the place does not turn into a sausage-fest (gay bars are a rather obvious exception), their service is also usually worse then bars where you go in, order some food and drinks and hang out with friends, but people go to this kind of places not to drink and have fun, but to hook up. Because of that men will often pay more to get into bars with more girls in them, and girls get to cut…	/r/MensRights	22/07/13 12:30 AM