TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PeteyMax Archive

View 30 posts and 476 comments by PeteyMax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
217

Marriage/ChildrenPeteyMax/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:51 PM
195

DiscriminationPeteyMax/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:09 PM
95

Edu./Occu.PeteyMax/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:29 AM
67

DiscriminationPeteyMax/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:50 PM
67

Social IssuesPeteyMax/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:44 PM
41

PeteyMax/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:55 PM
35

Legal RightsPeteyMax/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:50 AM
34

Anti-MRMPeteyMax/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:00 PM
31

Social IssuesPeteyMax/r/MensRights25/07/21 02:42 AM
31

PeteyMax/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:19 PM
30

FeminismPeteyMax/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:20 AM
28

Legal RightsPeteyMax/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:52 PM
25

DiscussionPeteyMax/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:13 PM
16

Edu./Occu.PeteyMax/r/MensRights23/09/15 04:38 AM
11

Edu./Occu.PeteyMax/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:26 PM
10

PeteyMax/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:29 PM
9

FeminismPeteyMax/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:46 PM
8

Social IssuesPeteyMax/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:59 PM
7

AnalysisPeteyMax/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:23 AM
6

PeteyMax/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:58 PM
6

DiscussionPeteyMax/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:25 AM
5

GeneralPeteyMax/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:15 AM
4

Social IssuesPeteyMax/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:11 PM
4

Social IssuesPeteyMax/r/MensRights03/11/18 03:28 AM
4

Legal RightsPeteyMax/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:45 PM
2

PeteyMax/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:55 PM
1

NewsPeteyMax/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:39 AM
0

PeteyMax/r/MensRights14/09/20 04:29 PM
0

Legal RightsPeteyMax/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:50 PM
0

PeteyMax/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:05 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

I haven't found any evidence of this. Quite the contrary.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:59 PM
3

"gender is a social construct" "race is a social construct"
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:38 PM
5

"the patriarchy"
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:36 PM
6

"toxic masculinity" "male gaze" "male privilege"
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:36 PM
5

"rape culture" "diversity" "white privilege"
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:34 PM
9

We need to organize this with men to demand some change.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 04:10 PM
6

It's much worse than that. We all know how promiscuous people can get with their co-workers, regardless of company policy or prohibitions against "harassment". If a woman sleeps with a man at work, good odds she has a high opinion of him. This, to me, suggests that it's often not the most competent man who gets the most respect at work, but rather the man who sleeps with the most of his colleagues as he has the support of all of his paramours.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 05:27 PM
19

Just find a better gym. Not all gyms are toxic environments.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:19 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ue4_MWwKY8
/r/MensRights19/11/23 06:18 PM
5

So basicly she's a prostitute who doesn't put out. A low-class escort.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:36 PM
11

Yeah, I'm not a big fan myself.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:33 PM
1

Regarding your first paragraph, I find the same thing at open mics. I'd like to play music that's a bit more edgy and political but I know that if I played some of the pieces I've written, I'd get thrown out of the club. It's a really nasty double-standard, as pretty much everyone else is allowed to be as edgy as they please. For instance, one time they were playing music over the sound system as a warm up, and I remember hearing the words, "everybody knows white people are assholes." Like WTF, …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:15 AM
1

Yes, doing science implies a modicum of research. And Wikipedia, the Atlantic, and the New York Times don't count...
/r/MensRights23/10/23 02:10 AM
1

As long as the Jewish lobby is as strong as it is, you're never going to have any success banning circumcision.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:07 AM
1

Your certainly never going to get it banned under their watch.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:06 AM
0

Jewish lobby.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 05:16 PM
25

They don't even bother to hide it any more. I have seen plenty of job adverts where it's made explicit that white men are either last in line for the job, or need not apply, even. Wish I could post a screenshot here...
/r/MensRights14/10/23 10:37 AM
71

The irony being, when men do it, women consider it about the creepiest thing possible short of actual physical harassment or assault.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:41 PM
4

This has been true for ages.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:46 AM
2

Man, that sucks. I used to rely on that site to give me unbiased reviews.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:38 PM
16

http://www.theoohtray.com/2023/07/23/film-review-barbie/ "Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister in charge of the wartime German film industry, believed the most effective use of the medium was to bury the message in ostensibly innocuous genre fare. You sense he’d have found Gerwig’s film a bit too on the nose."
/r/MensRights23/07/23 10:01 PM
9

Can't believe it got a 90% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:57 PM
3

Wow, sound absolutely awful. Not a big fan of Will Ferrell, either, so I'm definitely not going to see it...
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:53 PM
1

This is an excellent take.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:22 PM
2

I use a really cheap "straight" razor handle that holds a half a Wilkinson sword blade. I kind of enjoy the dexterity required to shave with an unguarded blade.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:03 PM
5

Don't care. I don't use the brand any more, in fact I just threw out a package of Gillette blades. Even if I go back to a safety razor, I have some no name brand blades I can fit to a Gillette handle. Fuck that company!
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:37 PM
80

To use sex as currency is to poison one of the most important parts of a relationship.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 05:38 PM
1

Pretty sure it's something like that. In affluent countries, the health problems associated with excess height, such as joint and cardiovascular problems, are not as readily apparent. From there, it's probably mostly driven by sexual selection: most women prefer taller men and taller men tend to be more successful, giving them a further edge.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:26 PM
12

The worst part is that this woman will probably only get a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 07:57 PM
1

No, Canada. The supreme court struck down all the old laws against prostitution as unconstitutional and gave the government one year to come up with something new. These were fairly in line with the U.S.: the act itself wasn't criminalized, but solicitation was as was "running a bawdy house" (brothel) and "living off the avails of prostitution" (pimping). In their place the Harper (conservative) government decided to insert the "Nordic model" which doesn't seem much of an improvement.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:50 PM
2

But if you are a man, it makes you a criminal, at least in my country...
/r/MensRights10/05/23 04:01 AM
38

Doesn't seem to be much intelligence here, artificial or otherwise. It's just parroting standard mainstream feminist talking points.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:00 AM
2

In other words, a weakness in their education. Ideally, school should teach one how to think. Sadly, I'm not convinced that's its true purpose, especially today what with CRT on the curriculum.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:30 PM
7

This, of course, has been understood for decades, yet feminists still refuse to accept or understand it for some reason. Likely because of wide gaps in their education and/or intelligence.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:46 PM
72

Anger is a natural response to injustice.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 11:26 PM
84

She has no business being in a school, teaching.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:56 AM
1

"debate group" Seems they're not very good debaters if this is their reaction to someone who disagrees with them!
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:05 PM
0

Seems to be practically the default setting for women today.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 05:51 PM
3

"It isn't that men are insecure, it is that these women do not provide security." Well said.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 05:50 PM
1

Does anybody still read that tabloid rubbish?
/r/MensRights02/04/23 02:58 AM
11

Looks like he had a good reason for trying to get custody!
/r/MensRights31/03/23 04:12 PM
3

Know of any screenshots?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:28 PM
62

"...as critics argue over who is in the wrong" Seems pretty straightforward to me. This isn't rocket science.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:27 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:38 PM
61

"Diversity."
/r/MensRights25/03/23 11:33 PM
1

"I guess he thought he was a man then. Now, he prefers to be considered a child.” Wow, what a disgusting cunt...
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:20 PM
10

Which becomes less and less true over time as more and more jurisdictions make it legal for women to go topless. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topfreedom
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:27 PM
3

I think that any man whose wife brings him home a bastard child should have the right to accept the child or reject it, that is to choose fatherhood or not. I think that a man whose girlfriend brings him home a child that is not biologically his should have no obligations whatsoever to either the child or the mother of that child. I also think that this is one of the core issues if not the core issue of the men's rights movement. Forcing fatherhood on men in this manner is slavery.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:48 PM
21

Of course they did. No man is going to want to eat there. No woman is going to want to eat there because she can't bring her boyfriend or other male acquaintance along. And no feminist is going to want to eat there either because there aren't any men to abuse or feel superior to...
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:00 AM
6

I like the way she speaks.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:43 AM
2

Would be nice if the "authorities" released the identities of these thugs. Probably one of the best deterrents: name them and shame them.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:20 AM
12

There are other, more serious violations of due process including in the criminal courts. For instance, Canada has introduced a new, stronger "rape-shield law" in which any communication "of a sexual nature" between the complainant and the defendant, must first be run by both the judge and the prosecution before being introduced as evidence. This seriously weakens the position of the defense.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 09:44 PM
5

Rubbish. These were volunteer units, not conscripted.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 05:36 PM
125

Women got the vote without the concomitant obligation for national service.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:02 PM
11

The idea that men are any safer than women in public spaces is becoming increasingly unsupportable in light of incidents like that in Toronto where a homeless man was killed by a group of female thugs. His maleness and the fact that they were all female didn't seem to matter in the slightest. Especially considering that they used knives in the attack. He still got killed and his attackers, considering their age and sex, will still probably get only a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:31 PM
3

You can pee standing up.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 03:57 PM
7

The law of unintended consequences...
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:03 AM
6

I keep thinking I should just use the "family" change room but change right out in the open and shower buck naked, also right out in the open!
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:17 AM
3

Interesting read.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 11:38 PM
51

At my local sportsplex they changed the male change room to a "family" change room. The male change room is now a little cubby hole in the middle of a long corridor. Don't you just love male privilege?
/r/MensRights09/01/23 08:54 PM
40

You can't read Nature without a subscription. If you really want to read the whole thing, best to head to the library of your local university and either read it there, or get a guest computer account so you can download it from the internet.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 05:58 PM
2

Not a big fan of this. They just need to enforce the laws already on the books.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:25 PM
13

Not the slightest bit surprising.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 04:24 AM
1

Castro Jr. wasn't the first PM named Trudeau to sell us down the river...
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:14 AM
1

"women's bodily autonomy": a fetus is a genetically distinct organism, therefore not part of a woman's body.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:57 PM
1

Also Germany.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:48 AM
1

"...men are not seen in a good light by society *despite the privilege*." LOL
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:41 AM
1

This is great progress, especially in a misandrist nation like Germany.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:29 AM
1

Yeah, I've noticed more and more posts getting deleted from this subreddit. Personally I'd rather have open discussion.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:25 AM
2

I suspect the majority of feminists are not consciously aware of how deeply unequal the things they fight for are. They lack the self-awareness necessary to understand things like fair play and equality. Much of this comes from a very deep, highly instinctual part of the brain. Simply put: most women are used to and expect to be treated specially by men.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:13 AM
3

Here's an interesting exchange in which Reddit simps try to show what virtuous white knights they are by somehow anticipating a woman's moves so as to make them "comfortable": https://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/svm1yw/women_of_reddit_whats_the_hardest_thing_to/hxhknxg/?context=8&depth=9 This just shows my much welcomed input to the discussion. There's actually a lot more...
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:01 AM
3

Canada.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:48 AM
4

"Menial"? I think you mean "trivial".
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:14 AM
11

I am "pro-life" but believe that abortion should be granted to woman under strict conditions, not as a right, but as a privilege for the purpose of harm reduction. edit: wording.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:19 PM
-3

I agree. I believe that abortion should be allowed, but only during the early stages of pregnancy, not as a "right" but as a privilege granted women as a form of harm reduction.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:20 AM
7

"My body, my choice." Except a fetus is a genetically distinct organism, therefore not part of a woman's body.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:25 PM
2

Worse, this woman is a professor!
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:52 AM
188

The first night I spent with an ex girlfriend she gently caressed my whole body in the most delicious manner. Little did I know this wasn't an indication of good things to come. Rather it was training: she would demand to be touched in that same way multiple times per week but somehow never repeated her performance from that first night!
/r/MensRights19/06/22 06:41 PM
2

Sadly, this type of discrimination seems to be widely accepted nowadays. Witness Castro Jr.'s Cabinet appointment.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 11:57 PM
1

That assumes that having multiple sexual partners is a choice worth making. It also assumes it's a moral choice. The drive to have sex and reproduce is ancient and powerful. Indeed, many people would argue that sexual and romantic fulfillment is a basic human need. Given the choice between obeying the law but having no sex and committing violence but getting sex, in many cases the more primitive, biological urge will win out. This is not as artificial a choice as you might imagine: many murderer…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:44 PM
2

https://www.cheknews.ca/victoria-coffee-shop-faces-backlash-for-deprioritizing-the-hiring-of-white-cis-males-1049562/
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:34 PM
10

Problem with these reviews: they're too obviously about the job advert which might start a backlash: all the wokesters will come flooding in in retaliation.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:20 AM
2

That's a good question. One would be, as men, to raise our standards: not just for our wives and girlfriends, but also our daughters. Obviously, it assumes we practice what we preach. edit: not to be sexist: also our sons; that is, we need to instill good values in our children.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:55 AM
1

The best would be to go back to monogamous mating. One man, one woman. That way, almost everybody gets a fair shake. If the Sultan has 1000 wives, that's 999 men who must do without.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:32 PM
1

I guess it's just my way of say that, no, I don't believe prostitution should be legal. I used to think so, but then it occurred to me that if we are to be consistent, then it ought to be legal to use sex as a tradable commodity in other situations. Not that consistency is ever much of a consideration in our modern world.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 12:31 AM
2

This will be an unpopular opinion, but I think that yes, prostitution should be legal so long as we accept certain corollaries consistent with that condition. Namely that sexual harassment in its classical definition--trading sexual favours for job favours--should be legal also. After all, if you can buy or sell sex, why should you not also be allowed to use sex as a bargaining chip in other negotiations such as employment remuneration?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:05 PM
12

It's much more important for a man to leave an abusive woman than it is for a woman to leave an abusive man. For a female victim of abuse there are tons of services and support. For a male victim, there is the constant danger that people will misinterpret the situation (especially the police) and he will end up in prison. In some jurisdictions, this is simply a matter of policy.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:22 AM
1

"Alright now, just keep your head turned that way... "That's good, that's good... "(Oh yeah...)"
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:25 PM
2

Personally I think this is one of the linchpin issues for men's rights. If a man's wife or girlfriend brings him back a child that is not biologically his, he must have the choice of giving it back. I think this should be possible at any time with the man able to sue for lost income as well as pain and suffering.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:05 PM
0

A fetus is a genetically distinct organism, therefore not part of a woman's body.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:49 PM
6

There is a lot of implicit bias against short people, especially men. The media is loathe to show any good, powerful character who is shorter than average. Take the character of Gandalf. In the books he is described as "shorter than average" and "stooped with age", as well as being dressed more like a tattered vagabond than a powerful wizard, yet he is often portrayed as being quite imposing. In the Peter Jackson films, for instance, Gandalf is played by Ian McKellen, who is quite tall. Another …
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:27 PM
-8

Well, he is a Brit...
/r/MensRights12/02/22 08:38 PM
2

Personally I think this is the crux underpinning all of men's rights: if a woman brings her man home a child that is not biologically his, he must have the choice of giving it back.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 05:00 AM
3

Yeah, I think affirmative action is the more likely explanation.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:17 PM
12

There's the case of the Australian civil service: they implemented blind resume evaluations in the hope of getting more women and minorities hired. This strategy was quickly discarded when the opposite happened.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:33 AM
1

I believe there was a woman in Edmonton who made a false accusation against a cab driver to avoid paying her fare...
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:54 PM
4

Another thing that might be worth reflecting on is how a certain segment of our population has been alleging just such a cabal of white men...
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:47 PM
3

Something that might be worth reflecting on, is how easy it is to criticize the white man, but how very difficult to criticize the Jew.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:58 PM
5

"or claims that Jews control the media" Is this not factually true? Are not the majority of stakeholders in the media of Jewish origin? I think it's pretty easy to prove...
/r/MensRights12/01/22 06:39 PM
2

Is this news?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 06:36 PM
36

What a joke. Yes, lets be sex-positive, yet shame men for their sexuality and their sexual desires: "If you've never been to a sex-positive event and you’re a single guy, don’t go and hit on all the girls." OK. Of course if you're a man, you're already used to being shamed even for something as innocent as asking a woman out on a coffee date. Most of us, at least those of us who've been around for a while, get even more jittery asking for sex. They go on: "If you’re there with good intentions an…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:08 AM
15

Women gooooood, men baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad.....
/r/MensRights08/01/22 03:59 AM
1

"Apartheid" is another word for "segregation". Americans don't like that word, of course, because it puts them on the same level as S. Africa, but it's true: before the 1960s, the U.S. was an apartheid nation.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:26 AM
8

I wonder...
/r/MensRights07/01/22 03:50 AM
10

As far as I know, it was the U.S. that invented affirmative action, as a band-aid fix to the wounds left by apartheid. It was the other Western nations that copied the U.S., not the other way around.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:27 AM
14

Good. Why should men face an environment so hostile to them? We will find new avenues by which to educate ourselves and contribute to science and tech while the universities crumble, to eventually be acknowledged as the laughing-stock that they are...
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:15 PM
20

Have you ever applied for STEM jobs before about 5 years ago? Because I have, and pretty much all of the adverts for jobs I applied for in both Germany and Canada stated explicit hiring preference for anyone who wasn't a white male.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:48 PM
98

Here is what happens when you tell the truth today: https://sputniknews.com/20211130/swedish-researchers-face-prosecution-for-study-about-immigrants-prevalence-in-rape-verdicts-1091128385.html https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/minority-professor-denied-grants-because-he-hires-on-merit-people-are-afraid-to-think
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:59 PM
91

Here is an editorial in Nature magazine: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00759-1 claiming that "white men still dominate in UK academic science." Their numbers? 76% of scientists in the UK are white. This from what used to be one of the premiere scientific journals. As far as I'm concerned, the universities and scientific journals are dead, at least if you're looking for honest science. The only way forward is to start our own institutions and try to keep the axe-grinders out.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:56 PM
18

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20220101155426/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/01/world/asia/south-korea-men-anti-feminists.html?referringSource=articleShare
/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:32 PM
3

If you go to Google ngrams and input "toxic masculinity" and similar terms (e.g. "white privilege", "male gaze", etc.) you'll find there was a huge explosion right around 2011. Many of these terms hardly even existed before then.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:00 AM
2

Stop using Google.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:39 AM
47

Propaganda from a certain group who are offended that their barbaric religious ritual is finally being called out is what it is...
/r/MensRights11/12/21 10:28 PM
3

This is a big problem in this feminized age. At some point in time at my local sportsplex, they changed the men's change room to a "family" change facility and the new men's change room is a tiny cubbyhole along a narrow hallway. I'm still not sure what I should do about it. Maybe shower buck naked in the "family" change room. I don't go there often so rarely think about it, but still... pisses me off...
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:55 PM
3

You need to learn to be more assertive. If you are tired and need to get up to work, you need to say so firmly and be firm in rejecting any advances. The other option would be to get separate beds.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:50 PM
5

Right to bodily integrity. FGM is outlawed, MGM is not. In Canada, reduced culpability if they murder their infant: contrast homicide vs. infanticide. Higher consideration in education and hiring. This is legal in most Western nations. Right to commit fraud: paternity fraud is rarely prosecuted and it is normally the victim who pays most for it. These are the main explicit legal rights. Many others are implicit. For instance, it's quite likely women are almost as if no just as criminal as men de…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:46 PM
1

It's not that bad. It's just her post-sentence probation that's been reduced: from 20 to only 5 years. The 12 year sentence stands so that's 12+5=17 years which is still a pretty hefty sentence.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 10:04 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHxf17yJsKs
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:59 PM
1

I get told off for using the slightly dated term "negro" to refer to those of African descent. Meanwhile, the media invents a new epithet for whites and men (and especially white men) practically every other week. Think "brogrammer" and now, "Karen".
/r/MensRights29/10/21 06:19 AM
16

What the hell do white men know of science? I mean they only invented the practice....
/r/MensRights29/10/21 02:42 AM
21

Stop reading that tabloid rubbish.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:50 AM
4

No. In several jurisdictions, legislation was tabled that would have made equal-shared-parenting the default in the event of a divorce. In every case, these efforts by father's groups and men's rights activists were scuttle by the National Association of Women. This is certainly not the only time feminists have opposed MRAs. When I was volunteering for CAFE, feminist-identifying, neo-Marxist groups deliberately disrupted our meetings, pulled fire alarms and barricaded the doors. Does it seem wis…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 04:07 PM
27

What exactly is it that makes these women have sex with minors, anyway? Is it a genuine fetish, or is it just insecurity that they don't think they can handle a relationship with a man their age?
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:51 PM
11

"Who's your Mommy? oh yeah.. that's right... "
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:43 PM
4

Personally I suspect this is the crux upon which all the rest of men's rights rest. If a man's wife or girlfriend brings him home a child that is not biologically his, he must have the choice of giving it back.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:12 PM
3

A fetus is a genetically distinct organism, therefore not part of a woman's body. Men, on the other hand, are still subject to infant circumcision...
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:57 AM
2

You should've gone to the dean.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 02:56 PM
5

In this day and age, the police will almost certainly not ask "what were you wearing." There is some controversy surrounding fighting back: first, can a man take silence as consent? and second, it's well known that fighting back almost always deters a would-be rapist. Of course reporting a rape will be stressful, but if a woman is telling the truth, then there will be virtually no possibility that she will face prosecution for false reporting, even if her complaint doesn't result in a conviction…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:59 AM
50

Why would a woman who's telling the truth have anything to fear?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:25 AM
3

I was thinking something similar recently. If a woman receives an unsolicited message on social media, there's a good chance it's a real fellow with a legitimate interest in her. Were she single, she could probably strike up a relationship with him. When I receive an unsolicited message from a woman on social media, it's almost always either a scammer or a prostitute. Which do you think is worse?
/r/MensRights10/07/21 09:53 PM
3

Well, no paternity testing. If the child's not yours... well, you get to keep it anyway.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 06:16 PM
1

Here's a recent one: https://atmos.meteo.uni-koeln.de/~bpospich/TUV2104-06_ACTRIS_IT_engl.pdf To be fair, it's gotten less common, although who knows what's going on behind the scenes.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:32 AM
6

How? How are we "privileges"? What rights and privileges do whites have that those of other races lack?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:27 AM
-4

I'm trying to figure this out: why did the judge double the bail to $10000? Given that he seemed to do that for no reason, it's understandable why she gave him the finger.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 01:16 AM
11

How many articles have you read in the last year that used the term "white privilege"? or tried to assert that you can't be racist against whites? I have personally received hundreds of job adverts that stated I would be last in line for a job both because of my colour and because of what's between my legs. Many of the complaints you guys have about men's rights are just as applicable to whites: discrimination in hiring and education, demonization in the media, even laws that blatantly discrimin…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:39 PM
10

Perhaps you'd care to list these privileges? For instance: is it a privilege to be last in line for a job? Is it a privilege to have zero organizations that advocate for your own interests? and those that try to are attacked and censored? Many of the complaints of men's righters relating to men apply even more strongly to whites.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:35 PM
20

There seems to be this impression among the white "woke" that if they disparage themselves enough--"white privilege", "you can't be racist against whites", etc.--that they will be better liked. Such people are not very good students of human nature. Generally, when you act submissive, people will abuse you more, not less. In order to gain liking and respect, you need to stand up for yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:39 PM
3

Cabin fever.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:41 AM
3

She committed the crime, yet he has to pay. Hmmmm...
/r/MensRights06/05/21 04:14 PM
18

Exactly. She brought the child into being, she can damned well pay for it.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:59 PM
28

The Supreme Court is the highest in the land. Once it reaches there, that's the end of the line, unless we can take it to the international courts (good luck with that--they're even more anti-male than Canada is).
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:58 PM
77

It's official: men in Canada are now slaves.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 05:13 PM
2

Personally I think this is the crux that underpins all of men's rights: if a man's wife or girlfriend brings him home a child that is not biologically his, he must have the choice of giving it back.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 05:11 PM
6

Want to know the origin and context of circumcision? Check out these two Bible passages: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2015&version=NIV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=NIV
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:37 AM
2

Want to know the origin and context of circumcision? Check out these two Bible passages: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2015&version=NIV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=NIV
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:35 AM
2

This has been true for a long time.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 01:12 AM
53

Personally I think this is the number one issue for men's righters. A married man should be able to choose whether to keep a bastard child and raise it as his own or divorce the woman who gave it to him and be completely free of her and her child. I suspect that all other rights of men stand or fall with this very basic right: to have and to keep a child of your own blood. The second most important issue is circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 04:26 AM
1

Ah, Billie's "daring" fashion sense AKA loud, tasteless, garish...
/r/MensRights18/09/20 04:00 AM
1

This looks like something for TRP. Gosh, maybe those guys have a point after all?
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:05 PM
2

"Art"
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:00 PM
17

Yeah, the Jewish lobby will make a big stink about it, just as they did when Iceland tried the same thing.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 06:08 AM
1

I used to wear spandex tights for running, cycling and cross-country skiing all the time. Often quite colourful ones too! Never really thought about it actually...
/r/MensRights17/10/19 11:41 PM
1

Jesus Christ. Is this woman an Arab? Read Genesis 17 and you might come to a different understanding as to why most Arab men are circumcised.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 02:46 PM
6

Shouldn't women retire later than men since they live longer on average?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:55 AM
1

Listen to what Janice Fiamengo has to say about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN7_pqgK8V0
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:40 AM
2

Textbook sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:37 AM
3

Garbage in, garbage out...
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:05 PM
0

There aren't hundreds of jobs available. I just haven't cleaned out my inbox in a while. And yes, if the job would've otherwise gone to a man but because of affirmative action it goes to a woman, you can certainly say he "lost" that job.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 06:13 PM
0

On the contrary. I have no idea how many white men have lost jobs because of such policies. Probably quite a few. What this proves is the legality of discriminating against white men. A number of people have been calling for the death of white men. Keep pushing in the same direction and this may become a reality. Isn't this what allegedly happened in Nazi Germany?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:17 PM
1

People keep using this argument. Frankly, I don't give a shit. It's the principle of the thing. During the last interview I had for a position in Germany, there was a woman from the "Ministry of Equality" or some other Orwellian title, whose only reason for being there, as far as I could tell, was to make sure not too many of my kind made it in.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:43 PM
1

These were atmospheric science jobs. What with the backlash against it, outright stating it is less common, but many of the ads had the following disclaimers: "In the event of two people of equal qualifications, women and visible minorities will be given hiring preference." Now you might say, it's only if their qualifications are equal, but how are you going to measure it? What that means in practice is that unless you hare head-and-shoulders above the next best woman or minority, you ain't gett…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:11 PM
1

I probably have several hundred job advertisements in my inbox that specify explicit hiring preference for women and minorities. White men are not considered a disadvantaged group, although I wonder what happens when whites become a minority? I imagine they will argue historical precedent to continue to keep whitey out-of-the-loop.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:21 PM
1

Yes, that was my point. But that's the nature of today's double-speak...
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:18 PM
1

Section 15.2
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:10 PM
1

Look for the words, "notwithstanding"...
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:06 PM
1

It's legal in Canada as well as in most other European countries. In Canada, it's actually guaranteed in the constitution, though it doesn't apply to (who else) white males...
/r/MensRights24/09/19 10:00 PM
1

Positive in this case means discriminating for rather than discriminating against. What that leaves out is if you're picking women over others and people of colour over others, who's left? So in the end, it doesn't really make any difference if you prefer some over others rather than reject someone.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 09:58 PM
1

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=KJV
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:38 PM
1

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=KJV
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:37 PM
0

Whoooosh....
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:35 AM
1

Yes, apparently 54% of mass shooters in the U.S. since 1982 have been white: https://thinkprogress.org/shootings-white-men-las-vegas-e378cfad534b/
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:34 AM
2

They aren't. There original school shooter was a woman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego))
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:30 AM
1

Don't forget, if we're talking peeing it usually takes women longer to undress, especially if they're wearing slacks. For men it's just zip and pull the thing out. Though I imagine the difference isn't much for skirts with no pantyhose (which nobody seems to wear any more anyway...)
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:07 AM
3

Oh brother. It's the surname that's important. I'm pretty sure Friedman is a common Jewish last name.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:01 PM
6

If being against the slicing of baby boys' genitals makes me a bigot, so be it. I can't help but notice that the judge's last name is Jewish and that the mainstream media has been strangely silent on the matter. It wouldn't surprise me that, as the pressure to ban MGM increases, we see instead countries in the West quietly repealing laws against FGM under the guise of "religious tolerance". If we are serious about banning MGM, the Elephant in the room is that we will have to go up against the Je…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:22 PM
2

Not a surprising development at all. The power of the Jewish lobby means that rather than banning male genital mutilation, countries, especially the U.S., where Jewish lobbying is one of the strongest, will opt instead to allow female genital mutilation so as to keep things consistent.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:41 PM
10

"Swedish comedian Emma Knyckare came up with the idea for the festival after a huge number of sexual offences were reported at Bravalla, Sweden's biggest music festival, last year." What they always fail to mention is who comprises the majority of perps...
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:29 AM
2

This should actually be done afterwards, not before since, presumably, the woman can withdraw consent in the middle e.g. if the man becomes too rough.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:49 PM
3

If she can't see the obvious bias against men in the modern world then she's an idiot. Time to ditch her ass and find a GF with something going on upstairs.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:15 PM
1

Come on. This is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 03:04 AM
2

I used to call myself a scientist. Many, if not most, of the jobs I've applied to recently specified hiring preference for anyone who is not a white male. Particularly those in Germany.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 01:59 AM
3

Thanks. We shouldn't be giving the sexist and racist NY Times any views.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 07:25 PM
0

Not worth the paper it's printed on. Not worth the digital storage it's wasting. This is the New York Times people. What did you expect?
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:27 PM
1

Just from self-interest alone you would think they would refrain from such behaviour. Does she think she'll get brownie points or some kind of reward? The obvious conclusion if her views become widespread is just a bullet to the brain.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 07:17 AM
1

In any case, who gives a damn what a bullshit rag like Fortune has to say about this issue? All these publication such as the New York Times, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, etc, sold out a long time ago. They are no longer serious news sources and should be thrown onto the same pile: the scrap heap, that is. The sooner we start ignoring them, the sooner they will lose their power to influence us.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:39 PM
2

It's not overwhelming. It looks like about a third think that it is a major problem. That seems pretty significant and well over half (~2/3 by exclusion) think it's a problem whether major or minor.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:26 PM
1

Unlike the content of the journals to which they are submitting, this is an incredibly important piece of scholarship...
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:32 PM
0

The personal attacks may refer to his mention of a rival in a job competition. Given that the third female Nobel laureate in physics was just announced, this may not be the best time to pursue this matter.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:39 PM
11

In response to statements like this, I like to suggest that in addition, because the majority of prisoners are black, most blacks are criminals. Unfortunately, they don't usually understand the logical equivalence either.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:00 AM
3

Haven't these people ever heard the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf? They don't seem to understand the unintended consequences...
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:15 PM
3

Haven't these people ever heard the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf? They don't seem to understand the unintended consequences...
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:14 PM
1

He sent sexually suggestive e-mails to a teenager. What a monster.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:08 AM
1

Don't forget circumcision, but she's probably a Jew so she can't say that...
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:30 PM
1

This is something I've been thinking for a long time. A little while ago there were all these articles about "Where have all the good men gone?" except the definition of a "good man" for them hasn't changed much: it's some combination of confident, tall, good-looking, good sense of humour, nice salary, well-educated, etc. Yet if you take the traditional definition of "good woman", there are demonstrably none left since part of being a good woman in the past was being chaste (if unmarried) and be…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:10 PM
15

I think this is the number one fight that men's righters should be engaged in. At the moment, it's common for a man to be ordered to pay support even with the court knowing full well that the child or children aren't his. This is a gross violation of a man's rights.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:45 PM
3

One wonders how often judges trade sexual favours with female defendants in exchange for lenient verdicts...
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:37 PM
1

Try Googling "European people art", "white couple", and "white man white woman" and see what comes up.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:48 PM
2

We shouldn't question men who are afraid of working with women in the wake of #metoo. Just #listenandbelieve.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:10 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:32 AM
1

Sorry, I disagree. A tiny brush to the buttocks warrants a full on physical assault? I don't think so...
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:25 AM
1

Sorry, I disagree. A tiny brush to the buttocks warrants a full on physical assault? I don't think so...
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:24 AM
2

Because the Times themselves are just as racist. Where do we find most of the articles demonizing white males? "Progressive" outlets such as the NYT, the Atlantic, Slate, Gawker, Vice, etc. It's time people started boycotting these rubbish tabloids. They're not serious journals...
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:46 AM
9

If a man had done the same, they would've thrown away the key, even back then. Instead, it sounds like she spent no time in jail.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:40 PM
1

Even if only 2% of accusations are false, doesn't mean we should abandon due process: that's 2% of accused men unjustly sent to prison. Rape is the least common violent crime short of murder. Does that mean we should decriminalize it?
/r/MensRights15/07/18 12:04 PM
3

You can get leg-lengthening surgery, or the cheaper option: heel lifts.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 03:09 PM
4

The fetus is a genetically distinct organism, therefore not part of a woman's body. Consider this: a baby is born helpless, completely dependent on its parents, just as a fetus is dependent upon the mother. Does this dependency convey a right to the parents, in this case of life and death, or a responsibility?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:33 PM
15

At least it should destroy her credit rating...
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:30 PM
25

You could decapitate someone that way. This is a very serious crime...
/r/MensRights30/05/18 09:40 PM
1

It doesn't hurt either that your libido is now in the toilet and even assuming you did want to go your partner wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole anyway because you're now such a sniveling wuss...
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:47 AM
12

Meanwhile any man who, seeing the current societal bias against men, asks, "how can I deal with my anger against women?" is pilloried as an evil monster.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:19 PM
1

Serial killer eyes...
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:37 AM
3

How or why is the SPLC (which I've never heard of before I started reading AVFM) an authority on who or what is a hate group?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:34 PM
1

It's impossible to say without listening to or reading the material, but yeah, if she's suggesting he was abusive and he wasn't then it's a pretty clear case of slander and he deserves compensation.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 07:27 PM
1

Is that how much magazines cost these days?! What a rip...
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:24 AM
3

The problem is if you complain about it... well, good luck getting any action in the future...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:37 PM
4

Fuck, that's Orwellian...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:02 PM
7

That's kind of rude, honestly...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:57 PM
16

What a crock of shit. How can anyone say with a straight face that publishing is dominated by men? Most authors are women, by a fairly large margin, I believe.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:05 PM
8

"Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown challenges accusers to press charges" He ought to be the one pressing charges.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:46 PM
2

Fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:31 AM
15

NY Times is infested with SJW bullshit these days. I wouldn't consider it a respectable journal any more: time to toss it on the heap with the rest of the tabloid rags...
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:52 PM
8

As they say, no good deed goes unpunished...
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:29 AM
2

That's good in theory, but who, after working 9-5 or longer, has the energy to go out and socialize after work? I know I never did. Plus I used to work in science. If you want to make it in science you don't really have time for a life outside. And if you are looking for an intelligent woman who is interested in an intelligent man, what better place to look than fellow scientists? All the my colleagues dated each other. Heck, there were even married couples working in the same department...
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:55 PM
12

Yes, we should have an exemption to the ban against female circumcision for Muslims.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:24 PM
12

I think I've been cat-called more than I've seen it happen to women...
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:42 PM
2

Here's a thought: journals like the New York Times and the Atlantic are no longer serious, unbiased news sources. They are now just like any other biased, tabloid rag. Stop reading them.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:20 PM
1

What, all five of them?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:08 AM
6

"I'm sure that you and your husband love each other in some way, but if he isn't willing to get a job to at least CONTRIBUTE..." Gotta love that. How long have feminists been whining about how "home-making" is real work or even, as in the following link, "the most difficult job on the planet"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-gbacsUKpc
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:06 AM
5

"Yeah, and when I do it on the show now, it's like the worse kind of sexual harassment because I'm like the boss," she joked. "And they're scared to complain because I'll fire them." This is the very definition of sexual harassment. Funny how she can announce it on publicly with zero repercussions, meanwhile a guy like Louis C.K. who asked permission of women who were not under his employ and who made no threats gets his career and reputation ruined. The double standard is alive and well...
/r/MensRights09/12/17 10:11 AM
10

The difference, however, is that male bonobos take no role in raising the young. The females do not extract resources from them or force them to watch over their young, even though paternity is uncertain. This is where feminism has got things badly wrong. The reality you describe is quite reasonable, but if it exists (and arguable we are pretty close right now) then men should have no stake whatsoever in child rearing. Feminists want it both ways: they can fuck whenever and whomever they want, b…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 01:56 AM
1

You have to question her judgement in admitting this. Everybody knows these types of things happen and they probably happen even more often than we think. However, because they happen, it suggests that we need to treat accusations of "sexual harassment" with a lot more caution. Was this just a case of after sex regret? Did the woman secretly want it? Should we fault the man for believing the woman wanted it? Hell, maybe it was the woman coming on to the man but it didn't work out. Humans have se…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:51 PM
1

When are these knobs going to get it through their thick skulls: whites are not the highest paid demographic. Not even close.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:08 PM
2

What a joke. "Conducted mostly by white men?" Social science is dominated by women. I wouldn't be surprised if more than half of this research was done by women and a significant portion with only women as co-authors.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:37 PM
5

Aren't the majority of journalism graduates women, by a wide margin?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:36 AM
5

I've noticed this a lot that "white male" or "white men" is being used as an epithet lately. I read one article which used the phrase, "of course the field is dominated by white males." OK, so what? How is this relevant?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:56 PM
8

He masturbates into the toilet, one of the women takes a dump right after and gets some splash-back and uh oh... she's pregnant!
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:52 AM
5

In this case the accuser turns out to be a man, but this is what has always bugged me about the whole sexual harassment witch hunts: if a woman wants to take out a male rival, all she has to do is accuse him of harassment and he's pretty much done. Edit: spelling.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:20 PM
20

This is practically the whole raison d'etre for the men's rights movement. It's double standards like this one. If something like this happens to a woman, not only can she sue for child support, she can send the dude to prison for sexual assault. Plus she has a number of options to get out of the pregnancy or otherwise rid herself of the unwanted child. If it happens to a man, tough luck, shoulda kept it in your pants! (edit: errors)
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:04 PM
21

They mention anti-semitism. I think it's time to set the record straight here. What does circumcision represent? Abraham was about to sacrifice his son Isaac to God but God told him He would take only the foreskin. In other words, circumcision is a symbol of human sacrifice. When the ritual is performed by a rabbi, it's common for him to take the penis into his mouth to help heal the wound. Yep, just what you want your son carrying around for the rest of his life: a scarified symbol of human sac…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:45 AM
4

One of the unintended consequences of stuff like this is that men will start clamming up around the women they work with, especially if sensitive topics are being discussed. Not exactly conducive to equal treatment. Feminists sure are good at shooting themselves in the foot...
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:52 AM
1

If she gets any punishment at all I would be satisfied.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:36 PM
7

I think the point is most of the time you don't have a choice. In theory they've abolished the draft here in Canada and a bunch of other countries including the U.K. for which I have a passport. Make no mistake, however, if they wanted to bring it back they could and they would.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 04:08 PM
1

Not just different jurisdictions but different countries even. Sentencing in the U.S. is very often harsher than in Canada. After all, the U.S. still has the death penalty. I pointed the same thing out but people didn't seem to like that...
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:51 PM
1

The two sentences are not directly comparable, unfortunately, because they are being passed in two different countries.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:52 PM
3

The woman with the beam box: sometimes you have to get a large, over-sized item home, even if you don't have access to a vehicle.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:33 AM
2

Because alimony is an anachronistic holdover from a time when women had fewer options for employment and were generally paid less than men.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:22 PM
1

Full text in this reddit post: https://np.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/6aitf7/false_claims_have_made_teaching_a_lottery_for_men/
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:31 PM
1

I think this is one of the most egregious results of rampant gender feminism and it puts the lie to complaints about "equal pay for equal work". Sure, a woman might be paid the same as a man but if she's not as well qualified then she's actually overpaid.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:15 PM
3

A local community sports center recently changed the men's locker room, which was spacious and comfortable, into a "family" change facility. The new men's locker room is tiny little cubby-hole with only a couple of benches. I meant to ask one of the female staff to describe to me what the women's change facility is like. I'm pretty sure it's the same as it was, although the new men's locker room is off the women's, so they might have carved a piece off it to make room.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:13 PM
1

This is exactly the point I was trying to make.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:41 PM
1

Depending on the severity. In this context, it's unlikely to be a severe assault ("Oh, some weird guy put his hands on my breasts! How will I ever live this down!") and if it is, the assailant is likely to find himself facing pretty harsh consequences, i.e. hard time. But to a large extent, how we react to negative events is under our control and part of the reason that rape victims suffer such trauma is that they are encouraged to do so. Look, I was once severely beaten about the head and face …
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:12 AM
14

Have you ever been in a situation where you would've ended up alone together with a woman? Suppose you were teaching a class and you arrived early along with one of the students. Except that's not what happened because the woman left, presumably because she was "uncomfortable". This has happened to me a number of times. Most women seem to think this is normal and proper, as if it's common for men to force themselves on women when in such a situation and as if she wouldn't have a perfectly good r…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:14 PM
4

One problem I find with these people is that they are too passive. He should stand up for himself: this is a public park, I have every right to be here. Please stop harassing me...
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:25 PM
3

What I find frightening is that a lot of people simply don't understand how this is an unfair double standard. You will point it out to them and then they will continue to argue against it. It's like they have no conception of justice or fair play.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:56 AM
10

I'm still not sure where this sexist stereotype that men are more likely to sexually abuse children comes from. I'm pretty sure that it's the other way around and the ratio is something like 2:1 female to male pedophiles. I say this for three reasons: more opportunity: women are more likely to work with children when women do it, it's more likely to be tolerated, either because it's couched in such a way as to appear innocent, or it's simply perceived as less harmful when a woman does it women a…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:36 AM
1

The comments towards the end: is that just her own personal BDSM fantasy or what?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:16 PM
15

I notice they got commentary from Elizabeth Sheehy, the law professor who wants to declare open season on men...
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:23 PM
1

Yes I find it incredible how so few women seem capable of seeing the man's perspective; metaphorically "putting herself in his shoes."
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:54 AM
7

The cluelessness displayed in this article is unbelievable. Either a man knows his biological child and can be forced to take responsibility for it, or a woman is entirely responsible for a child that she conceives on her own. You simply can't have it both ways. Sure, bonobos are promiscuous, just like human females, but the males take no part in raising the children. Why would they?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:25 PM
3

Didn't Milo Yianopoulos just get in considerable trouble for saying something similar?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:58 PM
1

This is very much a men's rights issue. There is a lot of talk about sexual harassment and part of the rhetoric often includes the assumption that all men are sexual predators by default. What's seldom acknowledged is that women in their turn will also pursue and seduce men, especially those higher up the ladder than they are. Yet it is the man who assumes the brunt of the risk in such situations, especially if he gives in to his wholly natural desires.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 08:21 PM
7

Are charges being brought against her? If not, why not?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:21 AM
10

Of course anyone with half a brain knows this. Strangely, it's not something anyone mentions when discussing sexual harassment or the problems of women in the working world...
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:36 AM
29

It's what's called a "rhetorical device." It's not arguing for these things simply using them to demonstrate a point of view. The problem with people who think that it's "angry", "woman hating" is they don't seem to be capable of much nuance in their thinking. They don't seem to understands literary devices and figures of speech unless they support their particular viewpoint.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:40 PM
5

WTF? They just love creating nasty double-binds for us don't they?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:32 PM
1

Not sure why I'm getting down-voted. She can do pull-ups which right away makes her stronger than most women and a lot of men.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:08 AM
0

Arm wrestling isn't really a good test of overall strength. There are champion arm wrestlers who are quite scrawny. It looks like she might be stronger than him in many other areas.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:24 AM
1

Dr. Who should be dead. He's had his 12 reincarnations already. Unless they want to turn him into an anti-hero so that he becomes like the Master. Maybe he is the Master .... ?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:03 PM
1

I think this is a fair analysis. It does seem that way.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:26 AM
1

This is what I found when I googled it: http://www.citizenship.gov.on.ca/owd/english/ending-violence/domestic_violence.shtml First sentence: "domestic violence is a gendered crime..."
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:43 PM
1

I don't know that this dreck bothers me all that much. The best response is to just ignore it. What's much more frightening is how many people in the comments section there are heartily agreeing with him. There seems to be a lot of hatred of men by women. I just read another article on Jezebel on this theme and it too was well supported by pundits in the comments. Where does all this hatred of men come from?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:02 PM
4

The cosmetics industry has just woken up to the fact that there's a ginormous untapped market consisting of roughly one half the population. I can't say I much approve of the trend but prepare to see a lot more men sporting eyeliner, lipstick, eye-shadow, blush etc.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 06:25 AM
8

On the other hand, maybe the real question we should be asking is, how does someone with only six minor publications get a professorship?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:28 AM
1

Heroic, even.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:08 PM
5

It's instances like this in which the true hatred of men by feminists is on full display. A man tries to make the most of an impossible situation, as men have been doing since time immemorial, yet still he gets shit on. I think the following quote that I found in the comments section of Jezebel is illuminating: "The perspective is that it's better you not terrify the object of your attention even if it means dying alone." Yes, better that a man die of loneliness and boredom than make even the sl…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:05 PM
3

The more likely outcome is that the new man would've simply accepted his fate and not asked too many questions as men are wont to do. How else would we have so many men still risking all by stepping into matrimony?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:44 PM
1

I'm really curious what the reaction would have been had the sex roles been reversed. I doubt there would've been even a peep about how morally depraved the actions of the protagonist were. Quite the contrary most people likely would've seen her actions as perfectly justified.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:34 PM
2

Reminds me of an ex-girlfriend: one demand after another. Pretty soon you can't keep track of them all...
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:34 AM
6

Yep, being a man was a real picnic back in the day. Nothing says male privilege like being coerced into swallowing your trauma so that you can continue to act as an agent of violence for the state.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 06:29 AM
5

We need to start our own male-only colleges. How to make it legal? Easy, just call it a religious order...
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:19 AM
0

Didn't realize there were still universities that still didn't have women's hours. Though to be fair, it's usually only a couple of days a week, not every freakkin' day.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:17 AM
2

I really don't get this whole, "banning speakers at universities." Why does it offend people so much if someone they disagree with speaks in the same university in which they are studying or teaching? If they don't like that speaker, they can do what mature people do every day: refuse to listen to them and not attend the talk. Problem solved!
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:58 PM
1

Jesus Christ. Can the double standard get any worse? "Manspaining,' "manterrupting" and now this...
/r/MensRights23/11/16 05:27 AM
6

Feminists keep claiming that such cases are rare. Yet we seem to be hearing about them on a pretty regular basis here. It's also a well-worn cliche that for every case that makes it to the media, there may be ten or a hundred or more that weren't publicized. And in this climate, we know that it's not just that they are being overlooked. They might well be being hushed up.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:46 PM
3

This is the very definition of sexual harassment: "Fuck me or you're fired." Funny how it keeps expanding in the case of women, but in the case of men, the most blatant example of it is ignored.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 07:08 PM
5

This is something I've been wondering for a long time.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:41 PM
9

Canada has the equivalent of the first amendment in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:27 PM
5

Except if we forbid the Muslims from mutilating the genitals of their infants, even though it's a religious rite, should we not also forbid the Jews from doing the same? Incidentally, Muslims also practice circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 09:11 PM
9

I think the elephant in the room in regards to circumcision is the power and influence of the Jewish community.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 05:07 PM
7

Shouldn't we read the book first before voting on it?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 05:39 AM
1

Use the speed up button under "settings". You can speed it up up to two times. Pick the fastest speed at which the words are still understandable.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:17 PM
12

The irony being that blatant price discrimination against males is something that MRAs are constantly battling...
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:10 AM
2

This has been my experience exactly. I can't tell you how many bungled repairs I've had from bike shops and how much attitude I've put up with. The best solution is to learn how to do the repairs yourself.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:34 PM
0

Not sure why you're getting so heavily downvoted. I would tend to agree. Maybe the problem is not adults having sex with 15-year-olds but rather our negative attitude towards sex. In this promiscuous age, it's probably better if most people gained experience early in life and and also that that experience was with someone older and more experienced rather than having two virgins fumbling at each other and then in college having all the misunderstandings that lead to lawsuits and men getting kick…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:10 AM
2

Yeah, probably. I was actually intent to create a whole alternate fake identity: buy a phone, set up a couple of e-mail accounts, a homepage, etc. In my field, published papers are worth quite a lot.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:24 AM
2

One problem is with qualifications. I list a bunch of publications in my resume and if potential employers look them up they'll see that they're actually written by somebody else. My considered solution was to upload all my publications to arxiv under different titles, removing all identifying keywords and with fake journal identifiers. Then try to point employers towards arxiv or google scholar rather than the actual journal website. Not sure if any potential employers actually look up my publi…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 02:36 AM
8

That's funny. I was actually thinking of doing a little experiment: select a bunch of jobs I'm interested then randomly split them in two. Send one half my regular resume and the other my resume but with a female name on top and see which one does better.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:08 AM
4

Somebody asked about the gender equality paradox and the response was, "I don't understand the question." Fuck, what a waste of bandwidth. If these "experts" don't even know their own field...
/r/MensRights29/09/16 10:02 PM
1

Doubtless she watched the "street harassment" video of the woman walking in NYC where, aside from the man that followed her, the most egregious thing said to her was, "Hello, beautiful."
/r/MensRights25/09/16 05:04 PM
3

Except in the case of a switch, her genetic legacy is still out there somewhere and she has the potential to reconnect. In the case of paternity fraud, your child never actually existed. He or she is a fantasy, a phantom.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 07:31 PM
2

I would argue that a simple switch of babies is not the equivalent of paternity fraud. A better equivalent would be if the woman's child is killed and another from a different mother substituted.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:15 AM
2

This is joke. The photo has obviously been doctored.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 02:43 AM
2

My ex girlfriend asked me to marry her. But it wasn't worded as a question, but rather a demand, as in: "Lets go and buy a ring." Yep, she was keeper.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:22 AM
1

Yeah, and it's this social safety net that conservatives are always trying to dismantle. Even in Canada, it's quite difficult to go on welfare. Both times I tried it I was told I had to have less than $500 or some ridiculously small amount of assets.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 09:17 PM
1

Sometimes we even give the disabled special jobs that they can work at at half-capacity. We never do this for the able-bodied for some reason.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 08:31 PM
1

By today's ethical standards, I would argue that, yes, everyone is owed a job, or at least, money to support themselves. Take the disabled: we don't just throw them on the scrapheap to die of their disabilities. No, we give them a pension, we have special buses that carry them around, special parking spaces to make it easier for them to access different utilities, ramps to help them move around, etc., etc. Ergo, by logical extension, what do we do if someone is unable to support themselves for a…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 08:27 PM
0

"The world doesn't owe anyone a job..." Honestly, for the average man, what other options are there? And if you can't find a job, how are you supposed to support yourself? Should you just kill yourself at that point?
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:44 PM
5

You've hit exactly on the point I was trying to make. I feel uncomfortable therefore it's my fault, according to you. I don't know about you, but I've had strange women do a lot of creepy stuff to me: sit down beside me and start telling me about her visit to the gynecologist; walk up real close, about four inches from my face and just start screaming; while I'm walking behind her, pirouette around to face me and say, "ta da!"; hike up her skirt in the middle of a coffee shop so she can show me …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:03 AM
1

She got a pretty mild sentence: 10 years for what is essentially first-degree murder is nothing. Yet it's still not enough.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:40 AM
3

I break it down like this: men get roughly 50% longer sentences for equivalent crimes. But it's not just at the sentencing stage that women are favoured: they are less like to be stopped; if stopped they are less likely to be arrested; once arrested they are less likely to be charged; once charged, they are less likely to be convicted; and they served less of their original sentence as men. That makes six stages: (3/2)6 = 11.4. In other words, there should be roughly 11 times as many men in pris…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 05:20 AM
11

I can't say I'm the slightest bit surprised by this. I'm not sure how anyone with eyes and a head on their shoulders could have failed to observe it. I wonder how much more invisible male privilege we are going to discover.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:39 PM
2

Shared change facilities were actually quite common in Germany. The sport center in Bremen Neustadt had one large room to change in with stalls if you wanted privacy but the lockers were out in the open. In the university the arrangements were even more awkward: the men's and women's showers were separate and so were the change rooms, but to get from the showers to the change rooms you had to use a shared hallway. A lot of people (both men and women) just walked naked. Not sure if that was the i…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:28 PM
-9

One thing is for certain: it's great publicity for her. Her albums must be selling like hotcakes.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:50 AM
1

Just google, "Jian Ghomeshi" and I guarantee you will get tons of results. The trial coverage is particularly comprehensive.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:13 PM
2

I'd say the chance of them being sexually assaulted (or just plain assaulted) by their peers is far greater than the chance of being assaulted by adult men.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:25 PM
1

If you have honestly failed to notice that women are favoured by the judicial system relative to men, you've got your head pretty fucking far up your own ass. No, you don't need peer review to see this, it's so obvious that even just anecdotally, the evidence is overwhelming. And in fact this favouritism happens at every stage in the judicial process: from being stopped by police to parole. When you do the math it's quite likely that women are every bit as criminal as men.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 04:28 AM
3

Shit. It has actually come to this: you can now be prosecuted simply for asking a woman out on a date. As if it wasn't a shitty enough ordeal as it is. No wonder birth rates are plummeting.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:45 PM
1

So it's just because they think she won't make a good mother that people are fussing about this?
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:48 PM
1

I honestly don't see anything wrong with this. Isn't this the whole point of personal freedom and female emancipation? If a woman wants a child and is able to pay for it on her own, then she should be free to conceive one with whichever willing male she can find. It's only if she demands child support (which as near as I can tell she hasn't) that it becomes more complicated.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 06:14 PM
1

I don't know about reverse-rape, but I think I've just been eye-raped!
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:03 AM
1

I'm definitely going to have to take a trip down to my local University to check out a copy of that article, since I'm unwilling to pay the absurd $40 cover charge.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:57 AM
1

Uhhhhhh.... how good of a mother is this woman likely to be?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:25 AM
1

Steven Harper muzzled government scientists. I am normally quite apathetic politically, but I marched on Parliament Hill because of that. That alone would be enough to make me dislike him, but I'm pretty sure it's representative of the rest of his actions while in power.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:30 AM
2

I can't say I'm the slightest bit surprised by this revelation. Here is someone who makes her living beating people up, who is stronger than most men and who I would give heavy odds on, is on 'roids. But most important, there is very little deterrent or social stigma against women behaving in this way, so why not?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:27 AM
1

The whole left-right dichotomy is a vast oversimplification anyway. Any system of classifying political "leanings" ought to have at least two axes if not more. Otherwise you're just arbitrarily lumping together completely unrelated positions.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:08 AM
1

Not sure if this is a troll or not. NDP would've still been preferable to the either the liberals or (especially) the conservatives.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 10:57 PM
1

I don't think you understand how the Canadian political system works. There were at least four candidates in my riding, but only two had any chance of winning: the liberal and the conservative. If you know anything about Steven Harper, you know why I didn't vote conservative. It's what's called "strategic voting"--pick the lesser of the two evils--and it sucks.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 10:54 PM
-1

To think I voted for this idiot, or rather his representative in my riding. But he's still better than the alternative...
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:31 AM
1

As long as she shows the clips of Big Red at the demonstrations, she definitely has to interview her as well for a balanced presentation. If the documentary is balanced and objective this strikes me as ideal for the MRM: show both sides of the issue and let people make up their own minds. It might also shed a light on some of the more negative aspects of the MRM, things we need to work on.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:47 PM
1

Last I checked she was only at $2000 so I highly doubt she'll make it. On kickstarter you don't get the money until you reach your goal. In other words it's better to set your sights low and the documentary probably isn't going to get made. Better to produce something more basic by leaving out a few things but have something in hand than be left with nothing.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:40 PM
2

Porn as well, but the written variety: romance novels and dreck like 50 Shades of Grey.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:36 PM
2

I did pledge a few dollars, but $97000 seems like a very ambitious goal, especially since she says in the trailer that it's mostly for "post-production."
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:56 AM
1

Is the whole thing legit even? I tried for ages to find a photo that wasn't censored and showed the actual goods but couldn't. I'm starting to suspect that Bieber's team invented the whole thing with nothing but censored photos so we'd think that he has a big penis.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 12:10 AM
1

The church is, or should be, concerned with making people more equal. The abolition of the slave trade and the emancipation of women was at least partly brought on by ideas introduced by Christianity. Sex outside of marriage was considered a sin because of the problems it produces in society that are only now just beginning to come into play. The causal relationship, however, was never made explicit which is why the taboo was (relatively) easy to defeat. Men tend to admire other men who sleep wi…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:17 PM
2

Look at how much income inequality has sky-rocketed since the rise of feminism and the "sexual revolution". The two may not be related, but I'm pretty sure they are: first, when people are under more pressure to be monogamous, men are more equal because no men are monopolizing all the women. Second, think about a work situation. We all know it's a bad idea to have sex with your colleagues, but it happens all the time anyway and nothing destroys objectivity better. In a mixed sex work place where…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:34 PM
30

This is rather rich coming from someone working in a sport like professional fighting. The sad truth is that in just about any sport requiring strength, the best women are worse than the worst professional men. The chasm is yawning: just look up the world records for power-lifting. The men's records are close to double those of the women's. And yet they often get paid on par. She should probably take on a few men first before bleating about her superiority. You could likely walk into just about …
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:06 PM
18

Yes, this is prudent. It doesn't just protect the student from harassment, it also protects you from false accusations. Actually it's probably better not to meet with female students in private rooms at all: go to the library or some other public place.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:35 AM
13

You would think this would be a feminists dream! No more need for evil, rapey men to involve real women at all in their sex play. No more chance of assault, harassment or whatever...
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:13 AM
2

Geez, their picks for sexiest are pretty weak as well, IMHO...
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:39 PM
1

When women and coloured minorities have to submit their work under a pseudonym to get published, it's a sign of discrimination against them. When a white man has to submit his work under a pseudonym to get published, it's also a sign of discrimination against women and coloured minorities. Funny that.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:35 PM
4

So because most powerful people are white males therefore all white males are powerful?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:58 PM
10

Yup. There's that white male privilege again.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:52 PM
1

Definitely not a good position to be in. I would suggest talking to your daughters directly: ask them why they feel as they do. Definitely don't badmouth the mother--your wife. Instead, explain to them the situation and allow them to make up their own mind. It seems a really hurtful thing to just casually bring up during dinner!
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:22 PM
1

Obviously trying to channel Julie Andrews. And not entirely succeeding. I don't know, they aren't that bad. I found them somewhat humorous...
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:54 PM
26

This is a very old article: it's dated 2010.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:35 PM
135

'"The current regulations yield a totally unfair result. Last year it was almost only women, 95 percent, who had worked hard to get into their dream programme but who did not get in because of their gender," Krantz wrote' Wow. That's weird. So when it benefits women it's not unfair but when it benefits men all of a sudden it becomes unfair?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 08:59 PM
-2

I beg to differ. Roosh may not have been an MRA in the past, but after this little incident, he just might decide to become one!
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:29 AM
3

There are other reasons why we should support Roosh and pick-up-artists in general. Most feminists are against slut-shaming and many of them also have few qualms about both indulging their baser desires and as well as virgin shaming. Yet in practically the same breath they will condemn PUAs. Roosh's writings are mild in comparison to some of the shit put out by radical feminists who are hosted by mainstream universities. Saidla Grundy, a new professor at Boston College, tweets "#KILLALLWHITEMEN"…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:53 AM
4

People are suggesting this shouldn't be here. This is a comment I posted to another item about Roosh: 'I'm pretty sure [Roosh's article suggesting rape should be legalized] was meant to be satire. "I may disagree with what he says, but I'll defend to the death his right to say it." Haven't you ever heard that? It's unpopular opinions that most need to be protected under free speech laws. Popular opinions will always have support. Isn't that what we're all about here? I think we have duty to defe…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:09 AM
1

I'm pretty sure the article was meant to be satire. "I may disagree with what he says, but I'll defend to the death his right to say it." Haven't you ever heard that? It's unpopular opinions that most need to be protected under free speech laws. Popular opinions will always have support. Isn't that what we're all about here? I think we have duty to defend Roosh's right to free expression, whether we agree with him or not. Even if they're wrong, feminists lump him in with you and me and all the o…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:58 PM
1

Because they don't understand numbers and they don't understand statistics. The whole idea of "patriarchy theory" is a massive logical fallacy which can be understood in terms of Bayes theorem. But try explaining that to them.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:24 PM
2

What I find most ironic is that feminism is actually enforcing patriarchal norms. The quickest way to get shamed by feminists is to show support for the MRM. The takeaway message? Suck it up, don't talk about your problems and try to achieve a high position in life so that you don't have to worry about the problems of lower class men...
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:47 PM
2

Ha ha that's a good point: "On a dim Saturday morning... "Within 24 hours George had five responses..." I had my doubts to begin with. This strains her credibility to the breaking point...
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:48 AM
2

I read the original article and I must confess I don't entirely believe it. From what I understand, female writers outnumber male writers by a considerable margin. It's almost certainly the same story for editors and even agents. I doubt there is that much sexism in publishing.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:26 AM
2

Sorry, I think that's bullshit. You either have free speech or you don't. Who is to say what is and isn't allowed to be said? Attacks on free speech are the whole reason guys like Roosh are so popular right now.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:04 AM
7

Whether he's an MRA or not, the fact that they want to shut him down is dangerous to free speech. Not that I'm under any illusions that free speech still exists in Canada.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:45 AM
1

Also shooting and ultra-distance swimming. I'm pretty sure a large proportion of the channel and lake crossing records are held by women. Shooting, of course, doesn't require much in the way of speed, strength or coordination.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:35 AM
10

Absolutely. Many schoolgirls who sleep with their male teacher did want it and did enjoy it. But society will always take a dimmer view of a man sleeping with a girl than of a woman sleeping with a boy. It seems to be something that's just built right in. It's this idea amongst others that makes me suspect that equality is just not in the cards. Men and woman are different, they occupy different positions socially and nothing will ever reconcile that. The current situation, however, is abysmal, …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:07 AM
1

The main issue I have with Elam is how he runs A Voice for Men. It is not a charity but rather a private corporation and he refuses to disclose his finances. In other words, your donations to AVFM go directly into Elam's pockets. Most of the people working there, incidentally, are volunteers. It is suspicious to say the least. For this reason, I will no longer be making donations to AVFM.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 09:30 PM
2

Wow! That's really creepy. Full legal support for a sexual double standard benefiting the female sex: "We have the right to whatever you have, plus a whole bunch extra."
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:42 PM
4

That is as frightening as it is sad and perverse. This may be one of the only joys available to this man--watching children play--because he himself is now too weak and frail to enjoy the outdoors. I wonder how much of this is projection that she is attributing her own perverse thoughts and desires to this poor old man.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:43 AM
8

“To be clear, I’m not interested in waging ideological war against feminism and want to distance myself from those MRAs and misogynists who seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time bashing feminism." Yet it was feminists who blocked the creation of the men's society. MRAs spend a lot of time fighting feminism not because they want to but because they have to. Because every attempt to draw attention to men's issues and ultimately to improve the treatment of men in society is blocked and ri…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:13 PM
1

This comment deserves more upvotes. A woman in just about any position can speak her mind about men. But let a man say something even moderately sexist and the shit hits the fan.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:57 AM
2

A more obvious and common occurrence of this paradox is in parliamentary democracies such as Canada or the U.K. when one party gets the majority of the popular vote yet nonetheless has a minority of seats in parliament. This is because of the way the votes are distributed: the winning party, despite losing the popular vote, has many ridings that win, but only marginally whereas the party winning the popular vote has very large majorities but in only a few ridings. The same thing can happen with …
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:54 PM
1

She's in a union. She'll keep her job.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:49 AM
1

On the other hand, people don't drain their chamber pots by throwing them out the window anymore either...
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:29 AM
15

Some people are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:13 AM
23

"Hughes' announcement will likely send men's rights activists into a frenzy but the principle of equal treatment does not necessarily mean everyone should be treated the same. Where the underlying circumstances of female and male prisoners are different, different approaches are needed to achieve equitable outcomes. This is a basic tenet of equality law." I love how these people twist themselves into knots trying to justify their position. How are they even able to function in life since they se…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:09 AM
2

It really is a nasty double-bind. To avoid the risk of assault or harassment allegations, the logical reaction is to avoid private company with women. But then you get in trouble for sexism. As a man, you can't win against feminism.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:02 PM
1

The door would've been hitting his ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:32 AM
1

Personally I think this woman should ask herself the question, "What race first tried to universally abolish slavery?" If she could answer honestly she might have a different attitude, not that she could since most of her other tweets were ahistorical.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:31 AM
13

As soon as you say that, however, you've acknowledged that men and women are not equal and that they must be treated differently. You can't have it both ways. You can't say that men and women are unequal in this one area and yet we'll try to force them to be equal in all these other areas. This is the same error that feminists consistently make.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:38 PM
1

This woman is mentally ill. She needs treatment.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:05 PM
1

I used to go swimming with my German girlfriend. There was only one change room that was not divided by sex. Instead, it had cubicles where you could go if you wanted privacy. I remember there was an older woman strutting around buck naked and for a lot longer than it would take just to pull off her swim suit, shower and change into street clothes. Now first, tell me she wasn't exhibiting and second, I think this illustrates more or less what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:50 PM
0

It would be hard to even define exhibitionism in Germany because of the whole, "freiecorperculture" (literally, free-body-culture) which is very popular. In many parts of Germany it's quite common to see topless women or even fully nude women and not just on the beach. In short, German women love to run around naked...
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:24 PM
1

I thought it might be a mistranslation, but there it is in the original German: "Ein Mann, der eine andere Person durch eine exhibitionistische Handlung belästigt, wird mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr oder mit Geldstrafe bestraft."
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:17 PM
3

"I absolutely hated communal showers..." Gee, I don't remember caring much for them either. But if you want to use the gym, they're pretty much mandatory. Unless you're a woman, that is...
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:27 AM
1

I don't deny that there are times for most of use when we need to escape the world. But the best place to find it, at least in my opinion, is out in the woods and the open spaces. So maybe what we really need are more parks and green spaces where people can find genuine solitude. These are things that everyone can use.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:41 PM
1

Do I have to be the one to state the obvious? Do I? Do I really? I mean if a guy could suggest that the two teens in "Hot Problems" weren't really all that hot...
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:11 AM
134

Disgusting. If three men had done the same to a woman they would've thrown away the keys.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:20 AM
2

I don't believe that all men are capable of rape. Quite the contrary. Human males are one of the few mammals that lack a bone in their penis, therefore they cannot get an erection on command.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:54 PM
42

When I hear about stuff like this it's not so much the lenient sentence that gets me, it's the double standard. Were it a man, people would be calling for his head. He would have been crucified.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:45 AM
6

Sounds like Paul Bernardo/Karla Homolka. Yeah, Paul's still rotting in prison while Karla has "paid her debt to society" and moved on with life.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:12 PM
5

Any statistic of that nature, e.g. "number of unconvicted rapists" "number of false rape accusations" is impossible to prove. You can only look at the surrounding data and try to see in what direction it points.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:27 PM
1

Oh I see. It appears the whole thing is an abstract. I stand corrected, and in fact now it's just the opposite!
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:03 PM
1

This is a master's thesis?! It's only 27 pages. To think I got called out by one of my professors for handing in a work report that was about that long.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:33 AM
2

Pretty gross considering that the vast majority of writers are female.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:23 PM
5

Ritalin not harmful?? You realize that it's a powerful stimulant, similar to amphetamine, both chemically and in its effects? I had a narcoleptic friend who used Ritalin to help him stay awake. Getting kids hooked on such strong drugs so early in life is a disaster waiting to happen...
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:48 PM
1

This and similar issues are the whole raison d'etre for the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:38 AM
1

That's good for schooling, but what about research? Remember, male professors are just as affected by the hostile climate in academia, possibly even more so.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:23 AM
1

You can also derive it from Bayes theorem. That's how I normally think of it. In fact it's been well studied in the psychological literature how human's do not have an intuitive understanding of Bayes theorem and make this error very frequently.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:21 AM
1

Except there's nothing in place yet to replace them. We need to gather together a group of men who have been burned by academia's PC bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:44 PM
2

If this does come to pass, then it'll definitely be time for some men to get together, figure out some legal loopholes, and start men's only educational institutions. Maybe pass them off as religious orders. It's high time this happened anyway.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:28 AM
12

That's awesome. Sounds like it could've been written by a Nazi. Gosh, maybe the term "feminazi" is accurate after all...
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:46 PM
4

These feminists don't seem to be capable of acting like civilized humans. If there are other seats available (as in so many of the photos such as this one) you take another one. If there aren't, you say, "Excuse me please," just as you would to a woman with two purses and five shopping bags hogging three seats. Is this so difficult? The irony seems to be that it's not men who are power hungry, space-grabbers but feminists for forcing men to take only one seat when more are available.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 06:50 PM
4

Nice way to stand the conventional narrative on its head.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 04:26 AM
2

Christ, listen to these idiots. This is the problem we're up against: the people passing the laws have no understanding of statistics. In one place a woman complains that a greater proportion of women are in prison for violent offenses, yet this seems to prove his point!
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:43 AM
2

What exactly was the guy doing wrong? Camping in a park? So much for America, Land of the Free!
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:20 AM
1

My theory about military staffing is that they're letting more women in because very soon all the most dangerous jobs, the ones that are currently being done by "special forces" will be done by machines, i.e. autonomous drones. The only place they need actual human bodies is as occupational forces and here it's actually an advantage to have women because the opposition is less likely to fire on them.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:37 PM
0

When I was in college I used to ski competitively. I was pretty bad: one of the slowest skiers in the circuit. Thing is, had I competed with the women, I would've done respectably, probably in the top half in most races and I likely would've even picked up a couple of medals.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:00 PM
0

Certainly the one about the Jews is vitriolic, but that's sort of the point.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:39 PM
4

What they say on their own time in private conversation is their own business, no one else's. As far as I know Sheehy is still employed by the University of Ottawa despite her rantings and has not been disciplined in any way. Summers, despite his rather mild comments, was forced to resign. Isn't "male privilege" a cornerstone of feminism? That statement is quite vitriolic. Maybe we should talk about Jewish privilege instead since they are, on average, better educated and better paid.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 07:12 AM
3

Effectively that is what the current politically correct climate does: if you are so afraid of speaking your mind because you might lose your job and get black-listed, then you might just start to change that mind, no matter how twisted-up the new one. And yes, there is a place for dumb, offensive humour. Ever watch Jim Jefferies or Bill Burr? And honestly, fuck you. I'm so sick of this bullshit where feminists get to spew their vitriol towards white males without any fear whatsoever of repercus…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 04:54 AM
8

Then the whole thing is bullshit. They are violating these students' rights to privacy free speech and free association. There was a time when what students did in private was considered to reflect badly on their school. But lets suppose, for instance, that a group of students were involved in BDSM, porn or prostitution. They almost certainly wouldn't get in trouble for it, but you might get in trouble for criticizing them!
/r/MensRights05/01/15 11:52 PM
11

Yeah that's great. The problem is what you risk if you screw up and approach the wrong woman in the wrong way: your job, your reputation, even your freedom. Fuck that shit.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 11:24 PM
6

My concern about the whole Dalhousie dentistry scandal: was the Facebook group private? If it was, then this is nothing short of thought-control: in a private setting, people should be free, as guaranteed by our charter, to say whatever they please and it is nobody else's business. Even if the group wasn't private, I still believe they should be protected especially since it doesn't seem the page was meant for anybody else's consumption. How often, at a party say, or between intimate friends, ha…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:30 PM
2

Absolutely. How strong is the case, that's the question, since the fetus gestates solely in the woman's body. No question the current laws are badly flawed since it's perfectly legal in many countries to kill a viable, fully developed infant, so long as you do so before it leaves the woman's body. Meanwhile, a man has absolutely no say how his genetic material is used once it leaves his body, yet bears a giant portion of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:17 PM
2

As it's normally asserted, the statement is false. A pregnant woman is actually two bodies: she is carrying an entity that is, in fact, genetically distinct. Her "right to her own body" is actually the power of life and death over her child.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:51 PM
0

Grammar Nazis!
/r/MensRights27/12/14 06:10 PM
1

No, but the option to get an abortion should be removed once the fetus is potentially viable at around two months or the second trimester. The idea that the second before birth you can plunge a rod through the infant's brain and then abort it like so much useless tissue with no legal repercussions is bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:39 PM
1

Once I was walking home from a bar and this girl stopped me and asked, "Can you help us dial a cab? We can't read the phone book because we're drunk!" Then she finished with, "Oh, by the way, where are you staying?"
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:55 PM
3

Given two people of equal ability and experience, the woman is far more likely to be hired as a scientist. It's a not a mixed bag at all: men have the short end of the stick in just about all of these.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:12 PM
1

There are a couple of sports where women perform roughly equal or even outperform men. Ultra long distance swimming is one. Many of the channel crossing records are held by women. Another is target shooting.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:38 AM
3

Another problem with the "special challenges" idea is that it's a return to Victorianism. Are all women delicate, wilting flowers who need to be protected from any and all forms of rough speech? If you've spoken to any young women lately, you'll know that most of them curse like sailors and talk about sex at least as often (probably more often) as their male peers.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:18 PM
3

Everybody faces "special challenges." Are women the equal of men or not? If they are, they shouldn't get special treatment, e.g. in the form of laws against catcalling. All these happened in highly populous areas. If either one were attacked, the woman would be most likely to receive bystander support. If any of those men attacked her, probably twenty others would rush to her defense. This has been shown repeatedly in a "social experiments" on youtube. Finally, the larger size of a man makes lit…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:50 PM
3

I should also point out that the "Tropes versus women" article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropes_vs._Women_in_Video_Games) is also overwhelmingly positively slanted.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:16 PM
5

I have done some editing of Wikipedia, but mainly only my own small corner of expertise. I've never tried editing more political stuff or even larger, "more important" articles that are in my field. Unfortunately I got into trouble for "conflict of interest" because I cited some of my own work. I'm still somewhat conflicted about it because it seems logical for me to write about stuff that I know and if I write about stuff that I know, then it's also logical to cite my own work as being the most…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:14 PM
2

That was sort of the point of this post. To draw attention to it and hopefully encourage someone to get in and try and fix the bias. Problem is you need a thick skin and a lot of patience to weather all the arrows that the ideologues will sling at you. It probably also helps to have some "status" on Wikipedia such as being an administrator.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:06 PM
14

I realize you are a troll, but there is plenty of evidence that she has done things wrong: stealing intellectual property, cherry-picking and misrepresenting evidence, presenting opinions as facts without any supporting evidence, and possibly outright fraud. Nobody is perfect and immune from defect. The fact that the article is overwhelmingly positive even though there is a mountain of criticism against her reeks of bias. Much of the criticism looks pretty valid to me. And by the look of it, the…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:53 PM
3

I think what you are articulating is the same issue most of us have with feminists. When it comes to things like street harassment, the causes are complex and the ethics ambiguous. Nothing wrong with asking questions and engaging in some critical thinking. But from the feminist point of view, there seems to be only one right answer, and not a particularly good one at that.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:56 AM
2

Is street harassment a problem for some women? Sure. On the other hand, the fact that women can complain about it and actually be taken seriously is definitely an example of female privilege. Men get harassed too. I have been catcalled or had strange women sit down next to me and say creepy or weird things. I often feel the urge to complain about it partly because at times it seems to be the only female attention I receive and partly because I'm so sick of hearing about it from women and I want …
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:27 AM
3

Thing is, most men on this site were aware of the issues long before they came here, it's just that they were afraid of voicing their opinions for fear of reprisal. Yes, it is possible (and a number of stories have cropped up in this very site) to lose your job if such opinions become known. Most people are unaware of the degree to which society and public opinion shapes their ideas; so much so, I would argue, that they are frequently unable to even articulate contrary ideas, even if they might …
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:21 AM
1

Doesn't matter. Just by statistical chance alone there will always be repeat victims. This model takes only that into account.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:07 AM
2

This doesn't take into account the same woman being raped multiple times, which happens quite often: rapists normally pick only on targets they perceive as vulnerable. The correct way to do this is to treat the 0.58% as a probability. Each year, a woman has a 99.42 % probability of not being raped, which amortizes over time: 0.994230 =~0.84 So she has an 84% chance of not being raped or a 16% of being raped. OK, the difference isn't that big, but this takes into account (crudely, at least) multi…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:02 AM
1

chosen rather than forced
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:25 PM
1

I don't know if I'm exactly offended by this--just not at all surprised. It's just so typically and confirms so many of my negative stereotype about the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:40 PM
3

What I want is an end to the double standard. I would prefer that both men and women be allowed to speak their minds, but I don't know if I would be too unhappy if women like this were sanctioned just like a man would be. I do find her comments somewhat offensive, but not to the extent that I think she should be punished as harshly as a man might be.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:34 PM
1

If there are strong social sanctions against me saying something--for instance, losing my job--then my free speech has effectively been curtailed. Of course this hasn't been tested in court yet, but I can keep hoping.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:29 PM
6

Yes. That's correct. It's not what's being said that's offensive, it's the double standard: 1. the sexes are supposed to be equal, remember? 2. free speech is supposed to guaranteed by all those exalted legal documents, one for each country
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:28 AM
10

The worst part: she asks the guy if he's got plenty of cash! He's twenty two and she's a senator for God's sake. Shouldn't she have a decent salary, plus a cushy pension??
/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:45 AM
0

This was something I pointed out in a another online discussion. Rape is not like murder in that it is normally assumed if you kill someone, they are unwilling participants. By contrast, a rape might not be a rape and the victim was, in fact, an enthusiastic participant. In fact she might even have been forced and yet wanted it anyway and enjoyed it. Lots of women enjoy rough sex. There seem to be a lot of complexities involved. I argued that sex can span the full gamut: from fully consensual to…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:59 AM
1

Two words: Calvin Klein
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:44 PM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:14 PM
-2

I'm rather disappointed that most of my comments are getting downvoted. It makes me question the motivations of the readers here. Perhaps you have internalized feminism to a greater degree than you realized. In today's society, women are supposed to be equal to men, yet all I see is an endless litany of double standards. When a girl sits down next to me on the bus and starts telling me about her visit to the gynecologist am I supposed to be flattered or is she a creepy weirdo engaged in street h…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:52 PM
-2

Read the text of the comic again and ask yourself the following questions: Did he threaten her? Did he try to bribe her? Did he say anything violent or insulting? His physical actions are not described, however if he was making sexual overtures, I can only assume that she responded since it is easy enough break these overtures by moving to another location, by pushing him away, etc. There was no coercion, therefore it was not rape.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:05 PM
-5

As I've pointed out elsewhere, a simple verbal "no" is not sufficient because men have been socialized to be the one to pursue sex. If every man took every "no" at face value, likely the human population would die out. How many times have you heard it, "I like a man who's confident, who takes control in the bedroom"? Where does this "confidence" and "assertiveness" end and aggression begin? It's a fine line and by feminist standards, a strictly subjective one--in other words, if she said it was …
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:55 PM
-6

There is no evidence of coercion anywhere in the story. She should take responsibility for her actions.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:39 AM
-10

If all men are rapists it is because they have been forced into that position. Consider how badly they are shamed for being virgins or being sexually inexperienced. Now consider that men are still expected to take the initiative in all things sexual and how the definition of rape has been expanded so that if a woman demonstrates only token resistance, then it must have been rape. It is an impossible double bind and I refuse to accept it any longer.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:38 AM
-5

Indeed. Sorry, but I guess I do question why women are incapable of resisting sexual overtures from men, and then later on call it rape. There's always this trope about men being more powerful, but I suggest you take it to it's logical extreme and find an animal that is waaay smaller than you are: a cat, say. Then see how easy it is to rape it, say, by shoving a broomstick up it's butt. And if women are truly equal, what would happen if a man was subject to such sexual overtures and then tried t…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:18 AM
1

By this argument, it should be the Jews who are under the most attack. I believe they are the best educated and have the highest average salaries of any group in N. America. Yet we never hear about "Jewish privilege." No, it's always white males who are singled out.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:16 PM
1

Where I was, I remember them actually airing it on prime-time. I think it was an attempt to legitimize it: look, it's on prime-time... it can't be that bad. I started watching in the hopes of catching some sexy-time action, but it was so bad I had to switch it off...
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:08 PM
2

Two words: Bubbles Galore...
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:53 AM
2

I think this is spot on. There is fine line between "assertiveness" and "aggression," in fact you could probably argue that the difference is mainly contextual. In many cases, yes, men with a propensity towards violence will be more likely to get what they want making them more sexually desirable.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:34 AM
5

Doesn't even raise an eyebrow anymore. The extent of male privilege is just so obvious. Why doesn't everyone see it?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:13 PM
3

Yes it does happen. There have been a number of posts about it on this forum. I don't know the exact laws by jurisdiction--all of the examples were in the States. I'm from Ontario and I haven't heard of a case here. On the other hand, I've heard of a judge ruling that a man must pay support for an illegitimate child, so I certainly wouldn't put it past them to force a minor to pay support to his rapist once he comes of age.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:22 PM
8

As someone pointed out above, the potential harm may be much greater: the boy is forced to pay child support for the next 18 years.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:00 PM
5

There is a third option and this is that we shouldn't treat men and women equally. This seems to be what both feminists and the rest of society favours. By corollary this unequal treatment must be expanded to most or all other spheres of life. It is this logical extension that feminists object to, yet are completely incapable of understanding.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:43 PM
1

This is kind of a silly question. Obviously, people will vary in their productivity. Even if we take it as a given that most women will be less productive on their periods, that still doesn't tell us how productive they are the rest of the time. I think most men will find their productivity varies a great deal as well. Certainly when I was working I found I might be extremely productive one week and do next to nothing the next. People are paid not on their minimum or maximum productivity but on …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:55 PM
1

It's not just that they refuse to acknowledge that men have problems. It's that men are not allowed to complain about their problems. This is just traditional gender roles all over again--only now it's feminists who are the enforcers--those who claim that they are against traditional gender roles. As a man, you are not allowed to show weakness. You are not allowed to show pain. So say our feminist overlords.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:22 AM
4

This is why we need men's rights. Why should men be so circumspect in their words? Do we have free speech or don't we? Sometimes anger and angry words are appropriate: it is a natural reaction to injustice. Turn the tables: do any feminists take much effort to temper their words and do they ever get censured for them? How many feminists aren't angry, even though they no longer have any reason to be? This is the most insidious barrier to men's rights activism. The sense, Oh, I'm saying something …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:52 PM
6

I think we should also be mindful of the internal contradictions of feminism and keep harping on them until everyone sees what a bogus ideology it is. I just wrote another post which points at these contradictions but it occurs to me that it wasn't worded nearly strongly enough. Some people say the MRM does too much of that, but maybe they don't do enough. And maybe we aren't direct enough.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:33 PM
1

= first world problems.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:43 PM
1

It all seems rather academic considering the "analytic engine" was never actually built. So whether she was the first programmer or not, there were no computers to run her programs anyway. Can anyone really be called a "computer programmer" when there are no computers?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:47 PM
5

Of course we don't know the actual source of the threats but when it's feminists being threatened, it's almost always pinned on MRAs. Is someone who opposes MR automatically a feminist?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:36 PM
86

Does any one else find it ironic that they accuse MRA's of being terrorists yet it is a MRA conference that is on the receiving end of death threats?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:38 PM
9

Honestly, I don't know how anyone gets away with saying that men are shallow and mainly motivated by looks while women aren't. From my own experience at least, the amount of female attention I receive is inversely proportional to the amount of body fat I'm carrying. When I was younger and in good shape, women would openly ogle me or cat call me. Thing is, I'm not very tall. I'd be willing to wager that a pair of lifts would do more for me than any amount of time spent in the gym.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:48 AM
2

A man is forced into the unenviable position of having to pay for the privilege of physical intimacy: something that no shortage of feminists will tell you is a basic human need. Using money that is probably hard won and that he can ill afford (especially considering the higher unemployment rate among young men vs. young women). And yet somehow it is the man who is oppressing the woman. Like so much feminist "reverse logic" it's highly offensive. It seems to me that the goal is to get to the poi…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:17 PM
4

Title from another, related, article: "Why Women Still Can’t Have It All" This is what we're up against. Do women honestly assume that men can have it all? That they don't make sacrifices and compromise? I think the problem is that Western women do think they can have it all, moreover that they are entitled to it.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:01 PM
1

"The important decisions are all still 100% made by humans." It will be the same with combat drones. I don't play video games, BTW.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 09:21 PM
9

And for those who think otherwise, this is a men's rights issue because if the suspect was a woman, if in fact it was for any other crime but rape, this almost certainly wouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 05:52 PM
23

Doesn't this violate at least two human rights principles: the presumption of innocense and the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 05:50 PM
9

And why do people always assume that just because a woman looks good that men automatically want to make love to her? As hot as she is, she looks like a complete psychopath. Would you want to have sex with Jodi Arias, let alone touch her with a hundred-foot pole?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:07 AM
0

You've got to be kidding me. Most of the time men are shamed for doing something female dominated, as in: "did you come here to creep on all the women?"
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:00 PM
1

I think you misunderstand me. My point is, it really doesn't matter who they hire as soldiers any more because human soldiers aren't going to be used in war, at least, not for the real fighting. This will be done by autonomous drones and bots. The human soldiers are just symbolic--they could be anybody. Glorified security guards, really. As for who designs and programs these things, yes, it will probably be mostly men, but the designers are a relatively small group of people. And yes, I'm saying…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:31 AM
1

No, I have never been involved in any way with the military. I'm not really sure how that's relevant. Most of the people making top-level combat decisions have little to no combat experience either (if they did, they probably wouldn't wage so many wars in the first place). From my perspective, I think all war is wrong and unnecessary, but that doesn't mean I can't see the obvious: drones are much better soldiers than humans. They do not tire, they are not affected by combat stress, they can be b…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:04 AM
2

Yeah, if you complain about the society's (mostly women's, actually) high expectations for men, then you haven't met them! Kind of ironic really.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:36 AM
0

Autonomous drones will soon be able to handle even that. There are now programs that can recognize a given individual by their walk alone. Soon you'll be able to feed a drone a list of individuals and their physical features and the drone will kill only them. Not that the U.S. seems to be all that concerned about civilian casualties...
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:28 AM
2

That doesn't require any physical ability whatsoever, so the question of physical standards is moot...
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:24 AM
-2

I keep hearing anti-feminists complaining about women getting a free pass in the military. But it's so obvious to me why it's happening and nobody bothers to talk about that: men (or women or any other type of animal for that matter) aren't really necessary to fight wars any more, at least not in any great numbers except possibly as occupation forces. In the future, wars are going to be fought by drones and bots. This is happening already with the drone assassination program in Pakistan. SEALs a…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:23 PM
3

Personally I think we should take back the term "white pride" from the intolerant bigots currently using it. Of course one of their platforms is that there is an assault on whiteness and the fact that just about any other group except white men can use the term xxx pride without condemnation would seem to support this. You're allowed to be proud to be a gay. You're allowed to be proud to be a woman. You're allowed to be proud to be black. Why not use the term white pride with pride? Why not be p…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:48 AM
5

OK. He spent fifteen minutes alone with these girls and then accused you of creeping on them? Sounds a bit fishy to me.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:06 AM
1

You hear a lot of complaints about the under-representation of minorities in television and other media. But there is at least one group that is over-represented relative to actual numbers: homosexuals (also Jews, but we I guess we won't go there today). Being gay today is the epitomy of cool.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:08 PM
1

This is just classic and illustrates beautifully the dissonance and hypocrisy of so many women and feminists in particular. I'm going to save this response somewhere.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:50 PM
1

They're attracted to some men. A lot of women are showered with attention from multiple suitors they have absolutely no desire for or interest in.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:58 PM
8

The best way for a heterosexual man to understand what it's like to be a woman is to be hit on by gay guys. I got quite a lot of free dinners from my gay suitors. The best was a fellow I met on "Couchsurfing." He told me I was fucking gorgeous, made me "food of the gods" for dinner and turned his apartment into my own private spa. Then when he asked me to join him in his bed, I just politely declined! Kind of makes me wonder why I should bother with women at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:48 PM
1

I for one am glad they now have men's only hours because if I was working out at a gym (I only work out in the park now because I'm too poor) I would use them (assuming they were convenient). When I go to the gym, I go there to work out and to work out hard and to do this, you need focus. Nothing is more distracting than females. They tend to deliberately dress down and yes, sometimes they hit on the men as well.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter