Pfheonix Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Get finnesed Suits are civil. If this is criminal, she just has to go to the police. The laughter might not be worth it, though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/02/21 03:00 PM
1	Why shouldn't women be hypergamous? Sorry, generalization of the goals of this subreddit. I suppose it was a bit much, yes.	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 06:35 AM
1	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. A woman has a responsibility to herself, to protect herself physically and emotionally. She has a responsibility to her current (monogamous) partner not to have sex outside of their relationship without breaking it off first. She has a responsibility to her future partner to prevent herself from becoming damaged goods and to be honest with him about her past. Yeah, she should break it off with someone before beginning another relationship, unless there is a pre-conceived agreement between all as…	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 06:25 AM
2	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. Thanks for the explanation. When I say that I don't care to learn about the principles, I do mean in regards to application in my own life, as I have the drive to be a family man. Wife, kids, backyard with a dog and spacecraft, the whole gig. Might not happen, but that is what I want for myself. I understand that you have a different view, and so I'm simply playing a dickish devil's advocate for the society in general to get a general idea.	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 06:13 AM
-1	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. I don't particularly blame you. TRP isn't for everyone, and the term gets thrown around so often that I think its lost it's meaning. Social theory in itself is quite stupid but TRP differs from, say, Socialist or Marxist theory in that it is micro-scale and centered around self improvement of the individual. The pitfall that most social theory falls into and can never climb out of TRP intentionally jumps into and says, "If I can't even get out of here I have no right to whine." That works for me…	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 06:03 AM
0	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. When did this become a bad thing? When it demeaned women for having previous sexual partners. Not necessarily dozens, or even ten. But there is still a stigma against having multiple previous partners. Responsibility to whom? As long as you desperately cling to this notion that women should have to take no responsibility for any of their actions, you won't be able to comprehend what is going on here. That's what I was questioning. How does having had sex before marriage, or even having met the m…	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 05:53 AM
-1	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. I'm not saying that a woman letting a train be run on her is a good thing, unless you're in the train. Get in and get out, but wrap it up. However, for having a sexual identity and sexual partners before the royal you, there is a good amount of slutshaming. What responsibility is there in having sex with someone, assuming you don't get an STI or a child from the endeavor, if you don't mind me asking? I don't have that mindset, so I'd like to get the redpill perspective.	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 05:20 AM
-6	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. Jay Teachman, right? Sure, it's interesting. Of course, not having read the actual study, I'm not prepared to argue the point, since I don't know the variables controlled.	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 05:05 AM
-8	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. The one you've created in your mind? Maybe. Or, if we look at the history of patriarchal society, it would laugh at your feeble attempts to make it fit your theories, and you'd realize that no. It would not frown upon adultery of men. That's pretty decent bullshit.	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 04:20 AM
-13	On the absolute necessity of patriarchy for women's long term welfare. Let me put it simply so that your mind can get it. I'll use tiny words. Man-dominated (sorry, I know it's hard to read such a big word) culture makes women who have many partners seem worth less. So, the fix is that same man-dominated (shit, used it again, didn't I?) culture, which tells women to keep themselves "whole" and virginal, to keep themselves from being worth less because they didn't. Which is caused by the culture itself. Seriously?	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 03:51 AM
0	Does the education level of a woman matter? Do you feel that you can contribute to the conversation should it move toward an intellectual point? Guys want to be able to have a deeper conversation like that. If your lack of education is displayed in terms of you attempting to fake it, he might find it annoying. However, if you're honest about not knowing something, he may like being able to teach a bit. I find it fun when I get to explain something.	/r/RedPillWomen	11/01/15 03:33 AM
0	Why shouldn't women be hypergamous? You use the phrase cock carousel as if the pussy parade you seek is of any more "honorable" or "loyal" value. You'll be as loyal as the women you deride. You see something you want, and have to ability to take, and you go for it, ignoring that "loyalty" you profess to have. You think that women are different from us. Granted, there's a public perception of that, but that's much closer to propaganda that society is forcing on you than anything else. Sure, they may say something and mean something…	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 03:29 AM
0	You know how we mock posters about the whole "Her husband might hurt you" observations? Yeah... about that. Or, and don't get me wrong, I've done it, you could not fuck someone in a relationship. Or, in her case, you could not fuck someone while you're in a relationship with someone else that is, supposedly, deemed monogamous. Or have I missed something?	/r/TheRedPill	11/01/15 03:14 AM