PhaedronGDR Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-2	Let's have this discussion, whom does society favors more? In the West women are more favoured, primarily because people don't invest in them not because the establishment is against men (although a small amount of them are).	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 09:03 PM
5	Most women would rather enjoy the company of other women than men? Yes, most women prefer to spend time with other women. But they'll interact with some men if they're popular or attractive enough.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 07:33 PM
–	It isn't immoral to have kids before marriage. Kids from married couples are better off than kids who are born to unmarried couples by every sociological (educational attainment, drug/alcohol use, crime, mental and physical health, social adjustment) or financial (income, homeownership, debt) metric you can imagine. As an agnostic, I can understand why you're weary of any criticism you receive from your religious family members, but you don't need to throw the baby out with the bath water. You don't have to build your life in opposition to t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 07:24 PM
1	How conditional is your love? Once a woman checks certain boxes (looks matched, in her 20s like me, no kids, faithful) I'm willing to have a LTR. Conditional love (from men or women) is fine if your conditions are clearly communicated and your (reasonable) boundaries are enforced, it only becomes a problem when the conditions are dropped on a whim for callous or impulsive reasons.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 03:15 AM
11	Does the modern dating process and relationships quash mens individuality? Absolutely. It seems like since most men only experience meaningful dating success once they're above a certain threshold of social value (having a large social circle which gets you invited to mixed gender events with lots of eligible women, a popular/exciting/assertive personality or high status) and/or physical attractiveness (handsome face/tall/athletic build) since most dating starts online (dating apps, social media).	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 02:45 AM
6	Would the Male Heterosexual equivalent of yourself have an easier time or harder time in dating? Adding 5 inches to your height (average height difference between sexes) would be a good start. Here are some other examples: Low BMI female = muscular or athletic build male hourglass figure = v-taper (broad shoulders and narrow waist) agreeable female = assertive male emotionally stable woman = confident man a girl who is well regarded by her family and her peers = popular and exciting male a woman with a graduate degree = man with a good career or homeowner	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 02:24 AM
-2	Would the Male Heterosexual equivalent of yourself have an easier time or harder time in dating? Your male equivalent would be 5'7'' (men are 5 inches taller than women on average), have an athletic build (the male equivalent of a low BMI in terms of attractiveness) and be moderately successful with women if they had an exciting or assertive personality.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 02:14 AM
4	It's not that men want submissive women, we just want agreeable women. This seems true to me. Outside of the most socially maladjusted parts of the manosphere, I haven't heard any men demand total subservience from women, it seems like they just want their crushes to reciprocate their affection. But the problem for most men is that unless they're part of the top 10-20% they're easily replaceable and as a consequence they would be treated like 4th choice LTR material in most cases or have women be extremely demanding towards them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/05/24 02:00 AM
4	The great "checklist" bait-and-switch (why most dating advice is useless) There is some truth to this thesis, unfortunately too many men procrastinate by 'improving themselves'.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/05/24 09:22 PM