TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Phallindrome Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Phallindrome on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What are some examples of "legal but deviant" sexual acts, and how involved does the complainant have to be?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:09 AM
3

Gay guy here; the sodomy limit is widely viewed as unenforceable, and will be ruled as such in the unlikely event anyone actually goes to court for it.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:02 AM
1

Ugh, Nikki Ashton. Can't believe I supported her until I met her in person. It was at a large group dinner, all she wanted to talk about was partying. And this was during her campaign for leadership of her party.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:18 AM
1

Sorry if this is too personal, but why aren't you able to get a handicap permit? Is it harder to get them through veterans' health care?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:22 PM
5

This is a parody trailer I've wanted to watch for the last several months.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:58 PM
0

I'm a gay man, I took the survey, I support Men's Rights, and I found nothing wrong with it. EDIT: This survey is the Male Role Norms Inventory - Revised, designed by Ronald Levant, a former president of the APA who has spent most of his career researching men and fatherhood. OP is a troll.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:13 PM
3

Well, I though that went without saying. Most first-world countries-that-aren't-America have social programs to reduce the burden of raising children.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:32 PM
3

Yes, why?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:31 PM
6

Why don't we just push for subsidized child rearing? There's definitely a national incentive to have kids; reproduction in most first world countries is below replacement rates. If we push for general subsidies, everyone will contribute, both male and female. High-income earners will contribute more, and low-income earners won't have to raise their children in poverty.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:18 PM
1

The eyes for the eyes?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:16 PM
-1

They are all victims here.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:55 PM
-2

It's called empathy.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:54 PM
1

Vengeance is a natural human desire. That doesn't make it an acceptable action.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:53 PM
2

For what it's worth, the Sun is a terrible publication here in Canada. Many people block them from access to events, because it's guaranteed they'll spin it to fit some right-wing agenda.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:06 PM
3

I don't think you understand how Wikipedia works.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:08 AM
3

They won't delete a page just because you don't like the content. If an editor is consistently a negative influence, you need to take it to Request for Arbitration.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:19 AM
1

That old data is research on various other forms of parenting, such as single parenting, divorced parenting, step-parenting and unmarried cohabitation, which was misrepresented by well-funded gay marriage opposition groups. Since then, conclusive enough evidence has been found showing that LGBT families have similar outcomes that all those fairly influential organisations I mentioned above feel confident defending it in court.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:07 PM
1

And what I am saying, and what is actually supported by scientific research, is that there is no data saying children have better outcomes with both male and female role models. There is, however, plenty saying they do well with two parents instead of one. The conjecture that it holds true due to gender-binary culture is just as disconnected with reality as the underlying premise. There is no difference in outcome. To continue to say otherwise, without evidence, suggests bigotry.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:19 PM
-1

I mean, you could say, "Children do better with both a father and mother", and have research to back it up, and they'd go off the deep end about your hereto-normative cis-gendered homophobia Well, except there isn't any outside of the homophobic apologia crowd, because gay couples, both fathers and mothers, do just as well as straight couples. Sources: The American Psychological Association, the California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Associat…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:16 AM
8

Male, just tried this, had no problem.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:17 PM
0

Um, excuse me, but in what country do more than half of men call themselves conservative?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:30 PM
28

"Oh, you have a penis? I'm sorry, I just don't approve of that lifestyle choice." In all seriousness, I'm incredibly jealous that it's socially unacceptable for me to breastfeed and only borderline acceptable to be a full-time parent.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:18 PM
1

Unless there is a court order to the contrary, either parent is legally allowed to take the child out of state without the permission of the other parent. If that were the case, would this then be a potential plan for OP?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 10:38 PM
2

I love that it's a textbox.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:06 AM
0

For what it's worth, I'm a gay guy and I'd definitely say that we're less likely to be interested in women, even just as people. I'd generally prefer the friendship of men, and I'll admit to some sexist feelings.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:42 AM
1

"However, not once to my knowledge has there been anything similar regarding Real Women. Imagine if the tables were turned and some bitter man penned a treatise on what constitutes a real woman." I have a book! Here's some quick and dirty pictures of it. Sorry, one picture is upside down cause I couldn't figure out how to re-rotate it. Real Women Don't Pump Gas, by Joyce Jillson, 1982. http://imgur.com/a/Qoqv4
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:17 PM
1

If you encrypt it, they cannot force you to decrypt it.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:03 PM
2

You cannot give meaningful consent to sex if you don't know the circumstances of the act. This is why people who deliberately have unprotected sex while hiding an HIV+ status are charged with assault.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:26 AM
0

You don't need a provision for supplying the video by court order. You cannot be forced to incriminate yourself, so if you want them to see just show them; they can't force it otherwise.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:22 AM
4

More importantly, using both the default ratings and the US women's rating, women come out ahead in nearly every country measured. EDIT: In fact, even if you make your only criteria Income OR Jobs OR Work-Life Balance, women still come out ahead in the U.S.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 10:13 PM
9

Um, I'm a gay gay rights advocate and that's absolutely asinine. I can absolutely blame people for their own willful ignorance and stupidity. That's like saying it's hard to blame people who think Obama is a socialist, because most socialists in the US vote D.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:22 AM
26

Wait, what? How does this have anything whatsoever to do with accepting gays?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:09 AM
4

Because sex is incredibly deep and meaningful and automatically seals a lifelong contract of mutual dependency or something and people could never sign a contract of that importance with their genitals while intoxicated.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:25 PM
12

This subreddit has over 75 thousand readers. That's a sizable population, almost twice as much as SRS and three times as much as /r/feminism. A userbase that large deserves to have its opinions given equal time on reddit, instead of being marginalized.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:30 AM
6

Eugh. Thank god I'm gay, because assholes are way more inviting than those.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:21 PM
1

Not necessarily specific advice, but more general things like "I never liked sports, please don't enroll me in any" or "Push me hard in school, I need the extra motivation."
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:29 AM
1

You're being satirical, but I'd actually love to see what would happen if expectant parents routinely traveled to the future to get child-rearing advice from their adult children.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:49 PM
12

Personally, I trust the word police a LOT more than I trust the word sheriff. EDIT: It's subconscious, not rational. Might have something to do with the Wild West culture.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:47 PM
16

It's a 50 minute program, I doubt there's any grading. It looks to me more like a seminar.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:35 AM
1

logically and emotionally Because they're sexually attracted to the female, right? ಠ_ಠ Because that's totally acceptable decision-making. Otherwise, we wouldn't allow it in the workplace!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:32 AM
2

What if he actually is a Jewish African-American?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:02 AM
1

Why would they bar MtF transgenders?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:33 AM
0

Who committed Roman crimes, yes.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:42 AM
3

It wasn't even an example of misogyny, it was an example of severe paranoid psychosis.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:18 PM
1

Ooh, penis pun thread?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:14 AM
4

Actually, assuming rounding to nearest whole numbers, this statistic is correct!
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:25 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristen_%28given_name%29
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:56 PM
1

Knew a guy named Lori once, he was some kind of Scandinavian. You know the type, with the hippie parents.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:45 PM
1

Actually, I was just inviting you to go on a 12km jog with me next week.
/r/seduction26/06/12 05:13 PM
1

This doesn't mean women are being dishonest with you. But attraction is more than logic, trust me. If attraction was all logic and reason, then none of us would end up butt-hurt, would we? I'll leave you butt-hurt. ;D
/r/seduction26/06/12 05:06 PM
1

You're the one that posted these potential headlines: "Woman attacks woman with baby, man to blame. Tonight on this particular news network." "Seriously that guy in the background just kept walking and didn't defend her; he basically assaulted her!" Now write one for "guy in the background subdues a woman."
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:50 PM
1

Are you seriously suggesting that a man should step in and subdue a woman?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 02:09 PM
1

Miles away, yes. It's usually accurate to the municipal level though, at least in my experience. But like I said, it's a portion of the necessary bits of entropy to finding out who you are.
/r/seduction24/06/12 03:27 AM
5

You can when you've got tons of other clues already. IP addresses significantly zero in on a location. According to my postings I'm somewhere in BC, but if you knew my IP you'd know what town I'm in. Add that to my statement that I'm in college, or that I work at a stationary store, and you're down to about 100 people. Take off 50 cause I've told everyone I'm a guy. If I work at a stationary store, probably only 10 of the 100 people working at stationary stores in my area will be my age. I'm whi…
/r/seduction24/06/12 03:15 AM
1

Not to keep track of someone so much as to connect a person with their postings.
/r/seduction24/06/12 02:00 AM
1

D= Your spam promotion is working!
/r/seduction24/06/12 01:57 AM
1

It could potentially connect your username with your IP. That is, if it hadn't been sent everywhere on the web. That's actually a great way to connect IPs to accounts, on websites that allow private messaging.
/r/seduction24/06/12 01:27 AM
3

No, because it's the middle of the night and you're the only person who has so far had the opportunity to be amused. =( It's just you and me... Wanna make out?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:21 AM
12

that they will have difficulty sexually The penis has been evolutionarily bred to be as good at procreation as possible. If a foreskin made sex more difficult for men, we wouldn't have them. The foreskin makes penetration much easier, acting almost like a lubricant in itself by sliding back as the penis initially enters the vagina. Off the top of my head, I remember reading a stat that said it takes 10 times as much thrusting force to enter without a foreskin as with. Also, if your child wants t…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:01 AM
8

I'd rather be equally fucked in a tenement house on welfare than equally fucked by all the other inmates in a shower. All fuckeds are equal, but some are more literal than others.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:50 PM
1

Fair point, I wasn't really thinking about all the possibilities.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:38 PM
1

Yeah, that's less 'preventing rape' and more 'adhering to your social group's fundamental christian rules'.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:42 AM
1

To be fair, I find it extremely difficult to take off skinny jeans when I'm the one wearing them, much less when someone else is.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:37 AM
8

Refusing to show your face at a nightclub is reason enough not to be allowed in, regardless of religion. Also, everyone gets searched going into clubs.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:49 AM
3

Might? It's already 100% indecent exposure.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:04 PM
1

/r/pickle?
/r/MensRights01/04/12 05:23 PM
7

What the fuck? Reading this makes me ashamed to be associated with you. You can't forcefully take what is already yours. Evidently, you think women should be returned to the status of chattel. Personally, I joined this subreddit because I believe (fairly strongly) in male and female equality. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but in the last, oh, eighty to a hundred years ago, women (and all those other pesky minorities like the blacks and the jews) got these cool things called "equal rights." In sho…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:40 PM
0

You sound suspiciously like a bitter beta cock.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:09 PM
5

Wikipedia automatically takes screenshots. Look at the history tab on top of the article.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:11 AM
2

Okay. The problem lies here: if their daddies weren't blocked out - Under the circumstance that their fathers are blocked out In English, using 'if' to express a conditional in this manner implies that the opposite is currently true. "It sure would be nice if I had a car" obviously implies that I don't have a car, for example. Now, I can totally understand this if English is your second language; counterfactual conditionals are complex and I believe German in particular does it differently. What…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 06:50 PM
3

Your comment implied that girls who put up with physical abuse due to their "daddy issues" (absent fathers, assumably) HAD absent fathers due to deceitful actions by their mothers. Full stop. There was no stated caveat that not all mothers do that. And yeah, I don't read peoples' histories before voting on their individual comments... sorry?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:23 PM
14

Most people recognize the difference between caring about equal rights for men, and misogyny.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 03:31 AM
4

ಠ_ಠ All well and good until it becomes standard practice to sterilize undesirable men.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter