TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PhantomBlack675 Archive

View 0 posts and 309 comments by PhantomBlack675 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I know bro, I know. Been at it for 2 decades. Women won't respect men's rights/dignity when most men themselves do not. Unfortunate that men lack the unity, self-respect and own gender affinity that women have. Genital assaults and mutilation of men is mainstream acceptable "entertainment". Look at all the TV and movies that depict it, is there even one revenge story (in light of so many adult women graping minor boys/girls) that depicts women sex offenders punished with mutilation? No one in Ho…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 12:32 PM
2

Fully agree. Without support of those men, feminism wouldn't last a week. As for women taking accountability for their own deeds, it's far more likely Israel and Iran become best friends.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 04:20 PM
1

Doesn't matter, they should be punished severely like they selectively seek for SA by men.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:09 PM
1

Female villains get killed off quickly, never beaten at length, tortured, mutilated. No graphic female frontal nudity, female nudity = blurry, fraction of second, low light shot, even though penises are shown in close up, in detail. No revenge movies exist that depict female rapists being killed or genitals tortured and mutilated, even though millions of female child rapists exist. We have movies showing (obviously props) severed male organs and testicle torture, but outside some EU movies, you …
/r/MensRights03/01/26 08:46 PM
1

They can't men become self-aware. Slaves need to be kept in check.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 08:33 PM
1

That is sexual assault. If men were to explicitly shoot women's genitals with bullets or arrows, would you still say it's not sexual assault? And sexual or not, it is neither less serious nor any more acceptable.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 08:25 PM
2

A sexual assaulter.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 08:23 PM
3

Sorry, but r*pe is far less severe. It doesn't prevent physiological pleasure or ability to partake in sex. In some incidents, the genitalia may sustain injuries but those are not deliberate but side-effect of the act, not the aim of the act itself.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 07:38 PM
5

FGM was banned in 1994. They could have banned circumcision in the same act, but no.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 07:36 PM
7

Yet never heard a mother say or express the desire to do similar kind of harm to women who SA their sons.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 07:14 PM
5

Most men are NOT collectivists in this context. Collectivist in profession? Sure. Think unions, strikes for collective interest trucker's union, bankers etc Collectivist in hobbies? Yes. Think Comicon, gamers, motorcycle groups Collectivist in nationality/regionalism? Yes. Collectivist in sex/gender politics? Not a bit. We're discouraged to see/play identity politics unless it's to take blame for women's issues.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 07:11 PM
13

An industry run by liberals/leftists, don't expect any rational/balanced takes from that cesspool of drugs, wh0redome and circle jerking buffoons.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 03:55 PM
1

They should teach certain things in school that aren't being taught, because they don't want to expose their game. Women don't want to get married, they want a grand wedding (or 2 or 3). Women don't marry a man, they marry his bank account/wealth. They divorce the man, but stay married to his money. For your parents: collect as many news clippings of and show them - incidents of wives cheating and murdering their husbands/children, false accusations, parents in jail owing to such 498a women. Onc…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:54 PM
6

This!
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:38 PM
5

Immaturity. Immoral character.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 09:41 AM
24

Likely due the US doing it on infants, while most others do it when the boys are 6-12 years.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:13 PM
2

If warning men about women who'll abuse/violate them is spreading hate, women are thousandfold guilty, yet you don't go on 2X and tell them to stop hating.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 02:45 PM
1

I'd advise such men to share their experiences, but with other men, to let them know women aren't pure innocent helpless victims they make themselves out to be.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:35 PM
1

No underestimation there, women know what they're doing.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 07:25 PM
6

I have zero respect for such c*nts.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:27 PM
32

If a woman gets drunk and drives a vehicle, she's held liable. If a woman gets drunk and has sex, she's a victim.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 09:18 PM
1

Not an expert on AI systems but: There's still an algorithm (program) or several, that processes the data, right? Let's say, for example feminist men who deny male suffering and misandry, they're largely* getting the same data (news, entertainment - movies, TV series) as MRAs, yet arrive at a different conclusion. * overall scheme of things, people will obviously not get all the news especially if it's not nearby/local to them
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:56 PM
1

Precisely so, but isn't programming about logic, and thus shouldn't programmers be logical?
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:03 PM
12

The I in AI isn't really intelligence, it's more aptly inference. All it's doing is gathering information it "reads" on the internet, thus biasing the matter in terms of more opinions expressed being misandrist than misogynist, since the latter is censored as hate speech. If AI is learning from prejudiced opinions, it forms prejudiced opinions.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:12 PM
10

Even AI is effing misandrist.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:05 PM
8

India is one of the most, if not the most, misandrist societies ever. media does a good job painting India as misogynistic, and some of those are valid, but the way mens' issues are downplayed or even turned around and treated as how it affects women, is wild.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 08:04 PM
1

No, they're not brainwashed, that's a literal flaw in the program.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 08:01 PM
6

"I want something but I'm not going to tell you what, you have to guess, and if you guess wrong, I'll judge you for it, and punish you for it, but I still want you to treat me like a rational, mature adult"
/r/MensRights22/02/25 08:00 PM
1

No good deed goes unpunished.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 06:10 PM
5

So how are you supposed to pay if your professional license(s) is/are revoked? This is nothing but corruption, and state sanctioned/enforced corruption at that.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 06:51 PM
3

Whole world, not just west
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:10 PM
11

Won't happen. Even though I've seen an increase in number of men who have seen through the BS and vocally denounce feminism, their hypocrisy and sexism, the vast majority of men are still worker drones obeying the queen bee. It will take extra-terrestrial intelligence to slap sense into that majority because they're effectively seeing themselves are heros standin up for the poor oppressed damsels and other men as the enemy, so our words are worthless to them.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:05 PM
3

You, sir, are a goldmine of resources. Saving this thread URL for later reading as it's late night here. Years ago, I read of a study on mice, which discovered that blocking estrogen receptors in mice brains made them more docile/less aggressive, than regular unaltered mice, quite pointedly hinting that estrogen is the hormone begin aggressive behaviour, for which testosterone gets the blame. The post below about roid rage alludes to the same in humans.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:07 PM
5

Shhh, don't talk logically, the femmes aren't equipped for that.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:17 PM
15

No, I assure you, modern women worldwide are becoming or have already become every bit as toxic and misandrist.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:55 PM
21

We all know why. Media is run mostly by wymmen. They're always going to paint themselves as the good, poor innocent victims.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:40 PM
6

The gynocentric thinking - even if she's an ex-wife and not widow, she should profit from the man's death. Do they do this for ex-husbands of women employees? I'm sure they don't.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 06:49 PM
170

Man = ATM. Even highly educated, high earning women want a man who makes even more.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 07:58 PM
3

There's no country for men. Except for the middle eastern (Islamic) ones, the only ones who've fended off feminism (but aren't free of misandry).
/r/MensRights13/01/25 07:22 PM
8

It is. Patriarchy is actually matriarchy wearing glued on moustache and pretend-deep male voice.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:16 PM
1

And if men did this to cheating wives/girlfriends?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:38 PM
9

Asia is misandrist as fuck too.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:37 PM
5

yet that is what men should be doing ...after all , that is equality.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:36 PM
0

Too lenient.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:35 PM
1

"Many are saints" Nope. Very, very few are saints. The others pretend to be, until they go from saint to satan faster than you can say wtf. Like in divorce court, where dozens of married men have expressed the shock when they found their "saintly" wives accused them of doing vile things with their children, to gain the upper hand in the case.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 05:16 PM
3

That's one thing common to left and right, conservative and liberal - men are disposable, women are precious, men are evil bastards who need to be whipped, women are innocent angles who need to be protected and nurtured. Just because they're politically opposed doesn't mean they have nothing in common.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:18 PM
11

Thus, vast majority of people don't consider boys/men to be humans, so as to have human rights.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:14 PM
7

Add India to the list of gynocracies.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 06:14 PM
1

That's why you don't just un-redpill yourself. (imagine the Sean Bean meme here).
/r/MensRights12/12/24 04:04 PM
0

Wasn't this about domestic violence? Where is rape or murder come in. If you are so selfish as to not care for long term damage in course of self-defence, don't expect others to give you that same respect. You want to kick your partner in the groin? Then you fully deserved that broken jaw and worse.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:56 PM
2

Oh yeah sure, go around looking for a rope to restrain her while she reaches for a knife to stab you in the back. You want to pretend women are angelic or rational, but lot many are not. I've read reports of the woman assaulting the man again after some time faking that she's calmed down. Every man has to judge that situation for himself and determine how much force is need to halt the attacker. And most men will give enough warning for the woman to stop and cease attacking, before they punch yo…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:55 PM
1

You started it right? Since you're so concerned over broken jaw, let me ask - most self defence classes tell you to assault men in the groin. That can have severe , life long consequences or death, but do you care about the welfare of men? Nope, when you are defending yourself, you don't care how unfair or disrespectful it is, so why expect men to kid-glove you especially when you initiate the violence, not he.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:51 PM
2

he’s more likely to severely injure or kill her Most men give multiple warnings to wives/girlffriends who get violent, before seriously hitting back. Clearly you're high on some illegal stuff.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:44 PM
5

Anyone who thinks women are romantic, tell me 5 poems or songs written by women, proclaiming admiration and adoration for men. Hell, list the top 10 or top 20 or top 100 romance/love prose/music and count how many are men and how many women.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:10 PM
11

0.001% of men/women means jackshit to the other 99.99% of the general population. What those idiots aka feminists mean by patriarchy is most reliably explained by oligarchy. But that doesn't fit their ideology hence the inexplicable mental gymnastics to make everything the fault of the "patriarchy" which exists only in their imagination. In reality, the limit of patriarchy stops at the doorway to the household, the man of the house can at most dictate that his daughter won't wear a mini-skirt or…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:54 PM
11

Ok, so then we can force these women to mate and get impregnated for the good of the country, right? Right?
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:55 PM
5

There are plenty of women suicide bombers. If there are hundreds if not thousands of women willing to blow themselves up for a mis-guided cause, surely the number of women willing to defend their country and people from such threats should be 10x higher.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:53 PM
81

They're looking up and complaining about the glass ceiling, but they never look down and appreciate that they're above the glass floor.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:49 PM
9

The problem is, patriarchy doesn't exist, it's a strawman. What we actually have is an oligarchy. The rich rule. Women complain they weren't allowed to study and go to work. Most poor women actually worked, they had to, and rich women did study and even go to universities. Key word being rich. How else do you have some women in the 1700s, 1800s become scientists, doctors/pharmacists, business owners? Married women not working (outside the house, for a third party) was a bragging feature for the …
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:56 PM
8

been saying that for years and years.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:49 PM
10

the gynocracy.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 09:21 PM
1

Maybe 60+% male demographic but only 6% pro-male/men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:04 PM
17

Most don't even after having a son. I've interacted with women so closed-minded and selfish, they get their sons circumcised but won't hear of it as nasty. "He's my child, I'll do as I please" , standard response. Imaging a father saying that about his daughter and watch their rage explode.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:02 PM
5

No, it's world over.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:54 PM
20

12+ rather
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:46 PM
4

Bwahahaha. Nope, don't believe you, we are not fooled.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 05:31 PM
3

Women are at even greater risk of STDs than circumcised or intact men, so by your logic, women should be circumsized moreso.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:36 PM
12

Add genital violence and mutilation. Even though only a small fraction of immigrants practiced FGM, the US banned FGM in 1994. In 2024, MGM continues to be legal, and Hillary continues to fund promoting MGM to Africa and Asia.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:58 PM
1

Oh they will, it's all they know.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:53 PM
8

MGTOW is honorable and grounded in reality. Huge difference.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:36 PM
9

any woman not interested in men is one less threat to me Not true. They may not be interested in you right now, to exploit financially, but they'll still demand you sacrifice something for them when the time comes.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:07 AM
10

Doesn't matter, her female friends will 100% support her. Women are a cartel. Hive mind.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:05 AM
2

Perhaps, but one of the points why mice are so often used for medical research is they have a lot of similarity in biochemistry to humans (and perhaps pigs since pig organs are being used as donor). I see your point, but it's not hard to see that testosterone alone isn't to blame for aggression, unless you're saying all violent women are high on testosterone (since women also make testosterone, but about 1/15th of average male)
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:12 PM
6

They probably are - I've read a good lot of sexual assault cases the perpetrators have a history of being sexually abused as children.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:06 PM
2

A study on mice indicated otherwise. There are enzymes which convert testosterone into estrogen/estradiol or such female hormone. When estrogen receptors in the brains of mice were chemically blocked, those mice showed far less aggression. I can see why these studies probably lost further funding.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:03 PM
16

Lose such "friends".
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:27 PM
11

But but but "anything a man can do, women can do better, with half the effort".
/r/MensRights17/10/24 08:07 PM
5

Factually though, that's not correct. Girls are born with all the eggs they'll ever have, they don't produce any eggs after birth, whereas sperm are produced after puberty.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:19 PM
13

And yet they convey nothing.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:21 PM
3

Since when have facts converted public opinion to do the right thing? If they had that much reasoning power, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place. All that library of facts thrown at the graduates of feminist brainwashing factories will perhaps get 0.0001% to wake up and see the light. Anyway, I admire your patience, I have lost mine, over 20 years of spitting facts.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:26 PM
6

Also, in what hypocritical world is deliberate groin assaults (on men) not sexual assault yet even light caress of a woman's breast is?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:13 PM
1

Sure East Asian women might be more demure than western, but I'd still be as cautious, a lot of them are mean as F. And Korean/Japanese men have their own woes with their wives.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:21 PM
2

3000 out of 3 billion?
/r/MensRights05/09/24 08:05 PM
14

Women manipulate or hire other men to kill or assault the husband on her behalf. I remember watching a documentary where FBI investigators said they've investigated homicide cases which turned out to be the wife hiring thugs to kill her husband and make it look like a robbery. Also many wives poison their husbands using slow acting poisons to evade detection. Forensic science took decades to catch up. Also remember, most insurance nominees are wives.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:00 PM
4

Women are physically much safer/protected from hurt, so the only "hurt" they care about is feelings, but only their own. If they had to deal with physical hurt as much as men, they couldn't afford to let their emotions run wild.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:12 PM
3

The ultimate irony - women "feel" unsafe but refuse to act in accordance to greater safety because civilization has made life so much safer, comfortable and carefree that women have abandoned any sane/rational thinking ability for "feeling". Our ancenstors would have perished if women prior to industrial age were so "feeling" and non-thinking.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:03 PM
1

Chill brah, 30 is still young. If women don't care whether you live or die, by dying, you don't win either. Everyone dies eventually, at 30 you have a lot more unwritten future ahead of you. Of course life comes with no guarantees, but in ceasing to live, you're ending even the whatever small chance of a better, happier life you could possibly have. I'd understand if you were 50, or perhaps even 40, but 30? Most men hit their prime in the 30s. Death is certain, no one escapes from it, just live …
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:52 PM
1

Don't be in a hurry to. The best revenge is living well. Live well, and choose your death when you've lived well and finally, maybe in your 60s/70s, decided , yup , I'm done. Till then, live well and prosper. Sex and intimacy are important, but it shouldn't make you want to stop living if it's lacking in life. How old are you man?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:41 PM
1

Even if you have "bad genes" according women because they don't want to date/sleep with you, you are still their "oppressor" , thus not out of firing range. You can still be accused of things like molestation/grape, or used in other ways. It's like knowing a snake is venomous such as a viper - while you can't always tell where those venomous snakes are hidden/camouflaged, at least the ones you see you know to avoid, instead of thinking they're harmless garter snakes.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:36 PM
43

The red pill isn't a movement, it's a moment. The moment of realization that you've been lied to, manipulated and used/abused, your interests quashed to serve those others. The red pill is a realization of reality is, what you choose to do thereafter, is what the movements are. Realizing the true nature of women, and men, and society in general, is not misogyny. You can choose to go MGTOW [not play the game at all] , or you can choose to be a player/game [play the game but differently after real…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 03:55 PM
36

Funny, because feminism is the anti-thesis of equality. Women do not want equality.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 03:32 PM
58

You're dead wrong about the red pill, if anything it's the best thing for men.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 03:27 PM
11

This. Exactly this.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:49 PM
12

Water and oil can still be mixed (I think it's called emulsion). This is more like matter and anti-matter.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 07:26 PM
1

If a war is always lost because you stuck to being respectful/ethical/moral/fair and the winners always win due to them being disrespectful/unethical/immoral/unfair , you know you have to become dirty to win. You cannot fight and win a war against pigs without getting dirty.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 03:43 PM
67

Because duh patriarchy didn't let their great grandmothers study women's studies.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:42 PM
24

I guess only females qualify for human rights and humane treatment.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:55 PM
12

Not one woman who has answered the question that I have seen has considered that HE may benefit from HER help Because women know they won't lift a finger to help a man.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:42 PM
65

Random women wouldn't help you if you were robbed or even raped by 3 women, so they should not expect men to risk their lives for these ingrates,
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:39 PM
1

If you have to fight pigs, there's no way you can come out of it without getting dirty yourself.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:54 PM
2

Then that leaves like 10000 women globally who are eligible for , er, sexual activity.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:45 PM
6

And not only do many women benefit from the crime (in cases of theft/robbery), many women instigate men to commit violence on their behalf. I remember someone mentioning the genocides in Rwanda, I think, where female officers some ranked generals, ordering the male soldiers to rape enemy women.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:40 PM
2

No, Asia is gynocentric as fuck.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 07:56 PM
16

Definitely one of the most misandric shows around. The hypocrisy in this show.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:47 PM
14

People don't see men as people.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:32 PM
32

Talk to a tree, set yourself free. Also, if you talk to a tree, it doesn't tattle to the entire forest. Women will tell her friends your penis size, shape, and every little detail but act like you're the pervert if you look at another woman's cleavage for more than 0.001 second. Hypocrisy is synonymous with woman. Whenever a woman wants to know you, 99.9999% it's to know how to hurt you.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 06:23 PM
8

Nobody cares if men get upset/offended. Just don't dare offend women. Hollywood now has more or entirely male denigrating content - from full frontal nudity but only dicks, no vags, to groin assaults and mutilation shown for comic effect and men have not protested. I think men have lost self respect and reason. The news has so many cases of female teachers raping students. Has even one movie been made about female rapists getting their organs mutilated in revenge? Yet dozens and dozens of movies…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:20 PM
10

More like, most men are idiots who are easily manipulated.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:02 PM
3

Pretty soon claiming men have any rights will get you labelled terrorist or such, in addition to whatever pejoratives are already in use.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:21 PM
3

Plot twist: what if the real reason they want women to know of husband's vasectomy is so that women can manage their cheating better.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:19 PM
11

They should, but they won't because it's way too much work to do everything by hand, so they've a nice cope to "rationalize" it - they (women) are "owed" a comfortable living due to past sins of the "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:20 PM
14

Women do the same. Citing that some men are criminals/violent, they expect women to be treated as perpetuall innocent victims, as though that gives women moral superiority over all men.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:16 PM
1

See, you saw her true colours after 12 years. That's the thing about women - they'll side with their own kind rather than side of right/truth. Cut such "friends" out of your life, it will be less toxic.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:28 PM
1

But only women's feelings are valued/considered. Men can go eff/off themselves, no one cares.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:31 PM
1

Egalitarianism 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You know who's actively preventing equality/fairness from being achieved? Women.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 06:05 PM
1

Meanwhile, assaulting a man's genitals isn't regarded as sexual assault. Why not?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 06:03 PM
2

You want to maintain the same standard of living even after divorcing your husband so you demand his money and property be given to you, why shouldn't he get his standard of living (i.e, whatever "chores" you did , and yes, sex) from you to continue too?
/r/MensRights25/06/24 07:08 PM
7

Because most assaults by women aren't reported, because when the victims do report them, they aren't taken seriously.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 01:47 PM
3

The very idea that one human being is more "valuable" than an other is revolting. And completely in contradiction to the "everyone is equal" paradigm bandied about.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:18 PM
38

And don't piss off men?
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:17 PM
25

Castrating females has huge benefits - no ovarian cancer, no endometriosis, no PMS, no uterine cancer, and they'll live longer too, saying how motherhood is so stressful.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:59 PM
3

You'd be better off making your own samwiches.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 03:41 PM
2

Sunk cost fallacy.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:42 PM
1

If that was true, we'd have won half a century ago.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:41 PM
2

It used to be true 20-30 years ago. Since then, they're already in bed with someone else not days after the husband ships out on duty.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:39 PM
1

This isn't naive, this is plain truth. Except for the girl waiting of course.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:12 PM
1

This isn't naive, this is plain truth.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:12 PM
3

Neither does his new host country, or any country for that matter. If you're not one of the 0.1%, you're cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:10 PM
43

Left or right, both are misandrist, is slightly different ways.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 04:03 PM
32

Because men aren't supposed to have any rights, only responsibilities.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:35 PM
7

Fight alongside the men. Because "anything a man can do, women can do better, with half the effort".
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:23 PM
8

Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. The former 2 actually had good modern cities with good infrastructure that Americans bombed to rubble.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:22 PM
12

Geez, how pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:08 PM
34

Ah, Simpgapore.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:03 PM
1

India is fucked. The level of gynocentrism here is no less than UK or Aus.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:07 PM
10

I suffered childhood abuse from my mother. Pretty much all her friends knew about it, yet they were and are still her friends. Did any women call her out on the abuse? Hell no. Women don't police or shun other abusive women, yet they expect men to. How is this not hypocrisy? Women are sexists, women cannot and do not want equality, equity or fairness.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:53 AM
5

Women also don't acknowledge that many, rather most, rapists are women.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:48 AM
11

Women's claims are mostly projection and lies.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:33 AM
31

If most men were half as bad/violent as women claim men are, they (women) would be cowering in fear in their houses, not daring to utter a word. And yeah, feminism wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:28 AM
4

They won't take your name but they'll definitely take your money.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:12 AM
12

Facts are a creation of the patriarchy (TM) to oppress women.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:09 AM
1

There are wicked men, and there are wicked women. but some forms of wickedness you see only in men, and some forms only in women. Those specific to women, aren't even recognized and punishable by law for most part.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:31 PM
0

I don't feel the least bit sorry for them. Society has always lied to us. Like "women are innocent and caring" , or that "women aren't egotistical or violent or power-hungry brutes" or "women mature sooner than men" or that "women are kind and forgiving" That maturity thing is important, because men are so commonly labelled as immature, yet feminism is a sign and result of female immaturity, ego and narcissism. Sorry not sorry, women are beyond redemption and forgiveness.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:26 PM
2

Female psyche is weird. If you look at female sex fantasies and kinks, a lot many really dig risque stuff, things that are socially or ethically forbidden. That's why women like to do it in public spaces where the risk of being seen doing the act is high. They don't want the easy way , most women can easily get a large number of men to say yes to sleeping with them. Children/teens? See the forbidden pleasures I mention above. Yet they'll scream pedophile if a 25+ man dares show interest in a 15 …
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:55 PM
4

Not so, even Spaniards and Scandinavians have truckloads of axes to grind against feminism.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:59 PM
11

No chop chop? People seem to be in a frenzy over cutting of men's bits for the smallest of things, but vanish into their holes when women rape.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:49 PM
2

As a certain character played by Jack Nicholson said : You want the truth? You can't handle the truth.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:20 PM
5

Independence from what? From dependence on one man who does love and care about her, to dependence on many who care far less about you when things go sideways. Depending on your husband is oppression, but depending on your employer (who has many more such employees) and can sack you at any time for any reason, is liberation. How I see it, women just shackled themselves to a nameless, faceless corporation or government as their husband.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:17 PM
5

Accountability and women? Whoa there, that's some real good stuff you're smoking!
/r/MensRights20/05/24 07:48 PM
10

Women have problems. Men are the problem. FTFY.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:56 PM
4

Feminism wouldn't have survived in pre-industrial era, there's too much work to be done throughout the day. Feminism only became a cancerous growth in the post-industrial era. Why? With washing machines, refrigerators, microwaves, vacuum cleaners, mixer-grinders, all such household appliances reduced the burden of housewives, complemented by packaged food becoming commonplace. Suddenly these wives had free time to watch TV and moan about how oppressed they are because of all the labour saving ga…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:40 PM
2

Not dying fast enough.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:31 PM
1

What stops things aren't a bunch of white knights, simps or cucks. It's more along the lines of the pressure hasn't built up enough and the right conditions haven't been met. Any fucking moment now. I call this critical mass, and it's a failed concept. I've been expecting this critical mass to be achieved ...like since 20 years and nothing has happened. An MRA is just a blowjob away from turning his back on the MRM, the older guys then used to say, and it's probably true.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:26 PM
1

Ah, the Esther Vilar and neoteny reference.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:12 PM
1

Too merciful for the crime.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 02:57 PM
26

Lot of women support this, in the comments. I recommend men whose wives cheat should do similar to cheating women. I don't expect those same women to be so supporting then.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:58 PM
30

No, chop off her girly bits.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:43 PM
15

Most.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:05 PM
13

Yet not improbable. I mean, adult women who raped teenage boys and got pregnant by that rape, have still gotten child support ordered by the courts from the boys they raped.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:49 PM
8

Women project their own behaviour and motivations on men, too.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:38 PM
2

Such a tragedy that this Mary wasn't Koss-trated.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 03:02 PM
5

Forgetting Sarah Marshall - several minutes full frontal
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:14 PM
5

They'll break up/file for divorce because he's too good to be true and makes her feel useless/inadequate/failed as a woman.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 04:08 PM
2

I don't just think men are awesome. I know.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:31 PM
2

Even post marriage assets should not be involved is one spouse has paid for it in full. If the payment is joint, the parties either sell the property and split the proceeds in the same proportion they pitched in, regardless of whether it's sold at a loss or profit; or one of the spouse pays the balance of the share and gets full ownership.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:25 PM
7

We live in a gynocracy. Men may be in charge, but it is superficial, much like how the chauffer is at the wheel of the car he drives, but the real power is with the one sitting in the back seat, not the one driving. The one driving is merely serving the one who wields the power.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 06:00 PM
2

They can, and they still downplay it as "had sex with" implying consent, or benign rather than belligerent.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:17 PM
5

One of the comments cites "Marry Cross" as a source of the 1 in 4 women will be raped statistic. It's Mary Koss, and her "study" is full of assumptions and connect the dots asserted as facts.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:28 PM
19

I'd feel for the bears, eating all those poisonous meatbags.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:26 PM
1

And that needs to change. OK, even if the word rape itself isn't used, the punishment should be what is prescribed for rape.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:09 PM
498

'took back to her apartment for sex' Rape. Wouldn't hesitate to use that term if the genders were reversed, yes?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:15 PM
2

So women [and men, by and large] are ok to post about gratuitously violent responses to male offenders, but silent about female offenders, you concur?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:18 PM
2

Even online, you often see posts by men who have children write how they'll punish anyone who tried to harm his kids, how they'd kill him/cut off his privates etc, but I've never seen women write similarly about women rapists. Never. Why is that? Even the cases that see court, women get lighter sentences. I have been undergone abuse in childhood, but not neighbours, certainly not women, ever confronted my mother over it. It's like women get a free pass to be abusive.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:53 PM
14

Misogyny isn't a problem, it's a response. Tell her/them that and tell us the reaction.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:20 PM
2

If that is so, where is the outrage?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:17 PM
16

If she stops putting money, that'll alert the wife.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:59 PM
2

people think they are less capable then they really are. Actually, this applies only to bad things. Good things, people believe/say women are as good or better than men at everything good/creative, but bad things, only men are capable of evil. The gist is - women are considered morally superior.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:28 PM
2

With no sense of humor
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:45 PM
7

10-11 years.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:25 PM
18

Perhaps it is, there are stellar women out there, but unlike how it is with bad men, bad women are not dealt with the same seriousness and zeal by women, as is with men. So I can only infer than women too think women like these shouldn't be punished because they're not adult/mature enough. Why won't women respond with the same anger/hate when women rape children? Lot of these women are or will be mothers themselves? Are they admitting that women aren't mature enough to punish .....or implying th…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:24 PM
30

I hope her fiance decided to end it.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:57 PM
-16

Jesus Christ would be over 2040 years old, if he were to be alive 😜
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:57 PM
19

a ten-year old boy is mature and adult enough to "make out" with his 24-year old teacher Same mental age, once you realize it, women don't actually mature like you're made to believe. There's a reason "women and children" are so often bundled together.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:56 PM
13

Misandry is truly global.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:58 PM
6

A trad wife who spends her days arguing with strangers/men, yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:04 PM
2

I've attacked by a dog when I was 5 or 6, I had to take 14 anti-rabies injections, and I still don't have a phobia of dogs, even though it was at that young age, not in my teens like you, when trauma can induce phobias a lot more easily - and top top that fucking cake, they say women mature sooner than men. Bears have so much more strength and far longer claws and teeth, even big dogs like Tibetan mastiff and Russian bear dog aren't a patch on a big brown/grizzly or even a black bear.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:46 PM
1

We're losing the war because we're not fighting back, forget fighting, most men aren't even aware.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:09 PM
1

But they are at war with us. Men just haven't fought back.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 03:47 PM
-1

OK - so let's fight terrorism, without hurting terrorists.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:40 AM
1

Most men in that said country are also poor. It's not like poor women with rich husbands.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:37 AM
10

99.9999% of women did zilch to end FGM, it was more men who did that.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:08 AM
7

Foreskin exists to protect and lubricate the glans, similar to why we have eyelids. You wouldn't recommend removing eyelids just because you got some eye infection, would you? You wouldn't know the downsides since you haven't experienced both intact and circumcised as an adult for sufficient period of time. A child born blind wouldn't miss seeing in the same sense of the term.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:27 AM
6

So accurate, I LOLed!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:53 PM
16

The cameraman never dies, and women never get punished.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:27 PM
4

Red Pill teaches much the same as radfems: "be the men women want, This is where you get it wrong. Red Pill is not a philosophy, it's a realization. What you're claiming it suggests, it actuall PUA - pick-up artistes. PUA or game, is learning to beat women's defenses and get her to be attracted to you. Red Pill is a realization, that men and women are biologically predisposed to behave certain ways that we cannot realistically change or control, so choose a way to live. Those ways are PUA, MGTOW…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:34 PM
16

Ukraine?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:08 PM
0

Know the difference between pick-up artists and red pill, you do not,.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:02 PM
3

Also make them read the book "The Manipulated Man" by Esther Vilar
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:56 PM
16

I'm surprised, nobody understands the connection between red pill and MGTOW? And MGTOW is the most peaceful of the paths from the red pill realization, but also the one that denies society access to men's money and labour the most.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:54 PM
1

I've read the Russian language has no words for rape, and maybe some other crimes. How/why and since when has Russian/Slavic culture been or become like that?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:10 PM
3

Adding something others haven't spoken about. Male rape and mutilation being treated as trivial or even comical. Plenty of Hollywood movies have presented male rape as funny (one of the American Pie series has a scene where a man is locked out naked and gets raped by a moose). Loads of movies depict men being kicked in the genitals as humour , by women for trivial reasons, woman talking casually about "cutting off your balls/penis" in movies, revenge flicks involving male genital mutilation as r…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:10 PM
3

"Women will have their fallopian tubes cut out" What? Shouldn't they cut off the tits and clit? Fallopian tubal ligation only prevents pregnancy, that's like vasectomy. F**k misandric Nigeria.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:53 PM
5

Because no female rapists have ever received any mutilation. It stinks of misandry.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:47 PM
5

Hahaha you kidding? most of them don't even see jail.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:44 PM
8

This misandry will only end when enough men do the chop-chop job on women.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:43 PM
5

But men have no rights.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:42 PM
7

Need vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:41 PM
2

They're biologically men, but mentally they're still largely women. Remember that scene from "Fight Club" ? We’re a generation of men raised by women. I’m wondering if another woman is really the answer we need. Growing up into a mature, well adjusted adult requires breaking of the maternal bond and maternal influence, in order the new adult to be able to think independently and question things.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:09 PM
2

Which society has ever cared for the well being of their livestock? We're oxen, whipped and beaten to perform and provide. Society will collapse if men are emancipated , educated and aware that it's us who are the ones in need of being freed.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:57 PM
3

In 1993, there was a movie "The Crush" starring Alicia Silverstone who as a 14 year old, has a crush on a 30+ man and accuses him of raping her when he declines her attention. An acquaintance of mine told me, where he lived there was a 7 year old girl in the same neighbourhood who told him "I want to see you naked" . I didn't ask for any further details other than a "damn, that's strange" response.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:52 PM
4

A decade? At least 4.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:01 PM
46

Workplace hours were first reduced for women and children, only then did it happen for men, otherwise people were forced to work 12-18 hours, with mostly men at the latter end. Then offices/factories often had spartan washrooms and minimal facilities, but once women joined in significant numbers, clean toilets and refreshments slowly became standard in most workplaces. So yes, unless women are affected, no one bothers if men have to put up with substandard treatment.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 06:58 PM
25

But feminism is taking revenge for imaginary crimes.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:24 PM
1

Circumcision has existed long before feminism, but feminism sure is preventing any progress towards banning MGM by drawing all attention to FGM only and making MGM sound like it's not mutilation which to any sane person, it is.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:46 PM
23

Women have all the rights, and men get all the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:39 PM
3

Men have always been treated like, moreso than women. With the rise of feminism, the reduced shit cast at women got thrown at men.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 06:06 PM
3

A culture that disrespects males (and all cultures do), isn't worth saving.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 07:40 PM
2

People who want to shit on the Red Pill will do it for whatever joy it gives them. The term originates in the early 2000s, not long after the movie "The Matrix" and the Red Pill only signified that you opened your eyes and see the truth is something else from what's being pushed. After you got the Red Pill, you chose what to do with your life. The 3 paths logically available were MGTOW, MRA and PUA. MRAs are the centrists who still think feminism/women can be reconciled with and that they will l…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:31 PM
2

That's not related to the Red Pill at all.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 04:25 PM
20

Don't be misled by the green in India.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 04:23 PM
1

Incels are mostly still productive members of society, they keep some systems running, they pay taxes and give more than they consume. Can you say that of the members of the F club?
/r/MensRights19/04/24 03:58 PM
2

Red Pill ideology is also contributing quite severely to the decline of gender relations in the west. Incorrect, Red Pill is the realization that ideology and propaganda have corrupted just about every fabric and every nut and bolt that society is built on. Red Pill isn't the cause, it is the effect.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 03:55 PM
2

That's what women imagine it to be, reality is very different. Women discuss their partners in detail with other women, including penis size, things you'd consider very private and not really meant for her friends to know, yet here we are. Men never ever discuss their partner's breasts/bra size/etc with friends, it's off limits. Most of what women claim about men and patriarchy is projection.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:24 PM
13

The "patriarchy" still protected women, made laws to protect women, but nothing for men. For all intents and purposes, the patriarchy was nothing but a matriarchy with a fake mustache.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:22 PM
1

Because male-only spaces are the patriarchy club chapters when men congregate to discuss ways to oppress women and give awards to the most oppressive performer of the year/month/week, and as we all know, patriarchy is the root of all bad things and it must be dismantled. /s
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:07 PM
1

Banning people will eliminate crime.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:25 PM
1

The problem, feminism doesn't want to solve the problem, they want the problem to get worse. That's what fuels their propaganda and bring them funds and power.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:24 PM
1

I didn't imply otherwise, but women know how to manipulate men rather well, into acting in stupid/self-destructive ways.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:30 PM
1

Feminism wouldn't survive unless there are men backing it. And feminism is based on a logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 08:12 PM
32

I read this article in the sun .co.uk , about how unjust it was that women had to pay alimony to their ex-husbands. Completely ignoring that 97% alimoney payers in the UK are men, and the average payout for women is lower that what men are ordered to pay.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:56 PM
1

Lot of conservatives support lower sentencing for women, especially mothers. Both conservatives and liberals are gynocentric, men are simply means to facilitating better lives for women (and maybe children), but do not care for men themselves.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:43 PM
10

But if you say every woman is a potential false accuser or baby trapper, that's misogyny.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:40 PM
-3

If men are logical, why does feminism exist?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:38 PM
18

"Those who willingly sacrifice their freedom for security are deserving of neither." - Benjamin Franklin
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:38 PM
1

Some guys are rich or at least well off, as in, have lots of money in the bank to buy a big 4 bed house and a Mercedes, but live in modest houses, drive an old car and don't spend on being fashionably dressed, don't like to go to bars, for them, picking up women is not easy. And while a very different thing, Warren Buffet allegedly drove an old Honda Accord for years and years. Most very rich men also tend to have plain looking wives, Buffet, Bill Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:13 PM
6

Post-feminist people hierarchy: Women > girls > trans/LGBTQ > animals In feminist doctrine, boys and men aren't even human.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:06 AM
11

Please don't put male "incels" in the same class as feminists/femcels. Male incels still for most part have skills and are productive, some may be nerds some may be employed in high paying jobs , building stuff and paying taxes. Feminists are parasitic, productivity is anathematic to them.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:27 AM
1

Feminism has reached Asia way back, and it has corrupted a lot (most?) of south Asian women.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:23 AM
1

Is there somewhere an Edward Rockhands and Edward Paperhands too?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:21 AM
4

Shows where society is headed, when peaceful movements are banned and militant ones put in charge. MGTOW is also misunderstood among most men. While some of us might approve like-for-like violent retribution , MGTOW is "I'm not playing this game at all, I'm going to take my stuff and leave, you don't get a say in it, you get to use/abuse my stuff and you're welcome to keep (what is rightfully) yours to yourself, I make no claims to your stuff. " The philosophy of MGTOW , if you were to imagine v…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:20 AM
4

Women even hit men in the groin and that's treated as a joke.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 05:26 PM
5

Fully? We're regarded below animals. Social hierarchy is thus: Women > girls > animals > boys > men
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:54 PM
3

Right on. Women not having to work outside the home was something to be flaunted, a sign of high status. Working class women had to work to make ends meet. Upper class women didn't work either. Clean cushy white collar jobs are the reason women want to work now, and even then lot of them realize it's not all that easy or fulfilling for most people.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:51 PM
3

Modern appliances like the washing machine and dishwasher, gave middle class/upper middle class women a lot more free time, then realized they are "oppressed" in this free time they got.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:47 PM
4

Tell your husband, your son is smart enough to choose for himself when he grows up. All that hygiene thing is bunkum, women get more UTIs than men, yet women get antibiotics but men get the scalpel? Over 70% of the world's men (most of Europe and Asia) are intact, and there's no epidemic of UTIs. Even then if he isn't ready to see the light, hope you have a daughter.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:32 PM
20

Conservatives are misandric. Liberals are misandric. Different assholes, same shit.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:03 PM
2

I disagree. Those willing to mutilate you while being intolerant of much less done to their gender, and then not ever have any remorse, do not deserve compassion.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:58 PM
1

Right now, not one of the battles has been won.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:55 PM
3

Women already get excessive and undeserved compassion. 40 year old married woman rapes a boy. "Poor woman, she must be so starved of attention that she had to do this with her student" OR Lorena Bobbitt, who attacked her husband while he was asleep "She was abused and just defending herself, had a bout of temporary insanity".
/r/MensRights11/04/24 09:32 PM
2

Ignorant much? Red pill is most associated with MGTOW. Red pill is not a movement, it is a state. Once you arrive at the red pill state, you choose what path you take - MGTOW, MRA and PUA. Since you don't even know what the red pill is, let me elaborate on the 3 paths MGTOW - dissociate from society and government as far as possible, become more like a ascetic or monk and disavow relations with women. MRA - try to salve the clusterfuck that marriage laws and society in general has become, try to…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:56 PM
3

Misogyny is the mouse in the room. Misandry is the elephant in the same room that people can't see.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:41 PM
3

I've seen it before. Women come into men's forums and say "Me, I'm not like the others, I don't hate men, I love men and yada yada" and in the end, the forum gets divided into a gang war between white knights and MGTOWs and gets derailed - while men's rights get no progress at all.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:32 PM
1

You know the good cop, bad cop routine?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:28 PM
5

Looks like you didn't study the feminist's man hating manual, v394 properly. It says in Chapter 4, women are 3467% more likely to be assaulted by known men than strangers.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:16 PM
6

Yup, women invented rape culture, false rape accusations, paternity fraud, misandry and gynocracy.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:11 PM
4

Ignoring cancer only allows it grow.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:09 PM
4

And women don't?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:06 PM
4

And she's still your wife?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:04 PM
3

Loads of women make up shit, literally, then expect to be believed.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:01 PM
24

And then women have the gall to shame men as behaving like babies for minor illnesses and derisive terms like man-flu. If women are so tough, I say let them handle all the tough jobs.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:19 PM
6

Feeding wild animals such poisoned meat should be a crime.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:06 PM
7

So that explains the loud complaining about rape, women make their vaginas their entire personality.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:48 PM
5

I wish some men grew the balls to castrate that bitch, along with Lorena B and Catherine Becker, else this won't stop. Men should do to women as they do unto men.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:46 PM
7

Lots. A few male nurses accounts I have read, mention female nurses deliberately exposing male patients' genitals in view of others, not drawing curtains when they need to do anything under the gown, even clicking photos with (unconscious) patient's penis as highlight.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:43 PM
64

I've written similar comments as the article, back on Twitter and farcebook, and that was over a decade ago. Men are stupid. If men had any sense, we'd burn the world to the ground for the disrespect we get.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:08 PM
240

Because men aren't human, silly.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:00 PM
81

The bear would be in greater danger of false rape accusations by these carni-whores.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:09 PM
1

Underrated comment. Women wear victimhood like a badge of honour and don't want to share it with men.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:48 PM
1

Erection is a physiological response, not an indicator of free consent. That way, women's vaginas also produce more fluid for lubrication, do people say she was willing?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:45 PM
4

if there’s one thing women are better than us It's unity. Men lack unity. Too many men are white knights or simps. The sisterhood. Women will downplay and deny female rapists exist. That is the true rape culture, and I would hardly be surprised if they true number of female rapists/molesters was 2-3x that of men. From teachers to nurses, I've read accounts from men of how they were molested/raped/exposed in public view, which, had the sexes been other way around, people would scream bloody murde…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:39 PM
1

I'd definitely support making genital assaults chargeable with at least the same punishment as rape.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:34 PM
4

Now where are those women and white knights who say rapists should have their genitals chopped off?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:28 PM
1

Women might not comment "lucky chap" but they also never snitch or call out on their rapist/molester sisters.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:06 PM
33

Men should just stop getting married, or even co-habiting with women. It's just not worth the risk, and the reward is too little.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:49 PM
6

Logic is a weapon of the patriarchy to oppress wymen.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 06:10 PM
2

Sure, suit yourself. Just that academia are so infested with politically correct liberal agenda that professionals in these spheres are mostly toeing the feminist new think. Children need to be taught things, not just handed a phone or laptop just so that mommy and daddy can work 15 hours in zoom calls without the kids disturbing. We had kids emulating porn moves and doing drugs long before cellphones. It's parenting that's lacking, not technology.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:18 PM
37

Women will never learn to value good men until there are none left. They will turn every last man into either a spineless simp or a misogynist. That fact that even the "good" women you speak of did nothing to punish or chastise the wrong-doing females, speaks volumes of the sisterhood's real intentions.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:40 PM
3

Women opposed conscription for women, some feminist groups even opposed the vote for women if it meant conscription as a precondition.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:46 PM
2

Sorry, no, this phenomenon long precedes mobile phones and social media. Sure these devices made it even more widespread but didn't cause it.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:37 PM
3

Neither are women imprisoned or denied any rights if they don't.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:14 PM
3

This pejorative term incel should not be used to drive a wedge deeper in the MR movement. It became used by feminists to shame men that didn't fall in line with feminazi propaganda. There's no need nor any sense of propriety in men using the same shaming. For all you know, those you refer to as incels possibly have more skills and make more money than you (or me). Just because they aren't conventionally attractive to women, haven't learnt "game" or female-please dressing sense, doesn't make them…
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:12 PM
3

When a man has these things, he will find a woman. She may not be a 10/10 but at bare minimum she'll respect him for caring about things in the real world and carrying himself with dignity. Not quite, if anything, a lot many women will exploit such men, run them into the ground and rub their noses in the dirt while taking his house, his money and leave him on the road, than cherish him.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:05 PM
4

Lot of Christian Americans do, as do Filipinos,
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:55 PM
4

Feminism is a victim's privilege circle jerk. They will never admit to being more powerful or more privileged because the entire doctrine is based on being powerless, hence the perpetual push for empowerment. They cite rape as a crime of power, so that women can never be guilty of rape, because by virtue of being powerless, thus incapable of rape. In feminist-land, a 40 year old woman is less powerful/privileged than a 12 year old boy she rapes.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:42 PM
12

Great work compiling all these with sources, OP. Deserves more upvotes.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:19 PM
3

What a jackass.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:03 PM
2

Your son isn't old enough to choose his religion. What if he decides on some other religion as a grown up, or become atheist?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:03 PM
3

Because women say anything a man can do, women can do better with half the effort.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 02:28 PM
2

Sure those cases exist, and I'd side with the mother in that case. But from what I have seen, women are the more petty and obnoxious ones when it comes to MGM, they say stuff like "It's my son and I will do anything I want with him." Imagine if a father said something like that about his daughter.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:36 PM
3

Men's Rights, as a movement, was successful. Far from it.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:15 PM
3

I'm surprised, shocked, that feminists would even oppose circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:11 PM
5

Long ago, circa early to mid 2000s, some MRM forums had women and some made some women the mods of the forum. As you might expect, soon men were getting banned for misogyny, because they upset the female mods. So much for safe spaces for men. Many men then abandoned those forums, saying letting women become moderators of men's forums is like letting the fox guard the chicken coop, and around then as also the time when MGTOW originated.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:07 PM
37

Why would a system that profits from men's ignorance and oppression teach them the means to set themselves free?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:44 PM
3

What's MSTOW?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:32 PM
9

There is, it's called MGTOW.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:53 PM
71

Tell them, "his body, his choice." and "no penis, no say" .
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:42 PM
1

No one mentioned genital mutilation? It's the USA, around 50% of all boys are subjected to genital mutilation within weeks if not hours and days after birth. Violence targeted at the male genitals. I read circumcision trauma also permanently alters the brain and that is supposedly visible in brain MRIs (can some doctors confirm?). Which other parts of the world practise male genital mutilation ? The middle east and parts of Africa, and those too are highly violent societies. When you're subject …
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:51 PM
1

There's a study on mice where blocking estrogen receptors in the mice's brains caused them to be less aggressive.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:35 PM
6

You want to eliminate suicide among men by telling them to shut up and not talk about the biggest thorn in their feet?
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:05 PM
1

Gender is a social construct. - also feminists
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:44 PM
-1

Ah, so you have to be a lion to be an expert on lions.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:43 PM
5

Feminists don't believe men have problems, feminism is based on the belief that men are the problem.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:41 PM
7

My-soggy-knee
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:14 PM
2

The comment above was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:53 PM
3

"Men only dominate women because their muscles make them stronger" "Anything a man can do, women can do better with half the effort". You can't make this shit up, and yet they did.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:47 PM
2

Ah, you know about GiMP, old hand I guess.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:52 PM
-2

women that actually like men. That's 5% or less.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:05 PM
0

I always recommend to men not to donate sperm.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:54 PM
35

They do. Simps are useful idiots to them.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 01:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter