TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PharmParty Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by PharmParty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Me.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:08 PM
0

While many other comments have covered the text... I am curious, what led her to form these opinions. When she looks at a woman working at a higher job - does she think she only got there because she fucked her way to the top?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:59 PM
5

This exact situation is why I support men's rights. What happened here is an outrage.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:40 PM
3

Someone should give it the Rosa Parks treatment.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:19 PM
3

This really is the heart of the issue. I'm sad it doesn't get more attention.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:47 AM
-2

Dirty cunt makes me sick.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 07:12 PM
1

Introduced by Sen. Tom Casperson (R) on September 27, 2011, to give probate courts the authority to terminate the parental rights of a parent who commits a criminal offense against a child.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:18 AM
1

Right. I couldn't find anything related to the submitters title.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:15 AM
7

I don't like the title for a variety of reasons. First, I believe the proposed Title does not shed an honest light on what the majority of the MRM wants (or at the very least, myself). Alternatively, newcomers to the subreddit, both men and women, may be turned off by such a combative title right off the bat and thus dismiss the forum immediately as "trolling" or what have you. Second, the title makes absolutely zero mention of MensRights. The forum is about discussing Mens Rights, not earning s…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:39 PM
3

Why not something like "A community dedicated to raising awareness of male related issues and encouraging intelligent discussion." I feel the "earning scorn" as too combative right off the bat. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:58 AM
3

...the attacker... was meticulous about not leaving evidence at the scene. He wore gloves and a mask, and brought with him wet wipes to clean up the scene after assaulting women for hours. Afterward, he made his victims brush their teeth and shower, and he took their clothes and bedding with him when he left, Golden Detective Stacy Galbraith said. False-rape claims are a very real problem. In my opinion, this case is distinguishable from a false-rape claim. The prototype false-rape claim is one …
/r/MensRights14/04/11 04:38 PM
6

I bet that "If you don't do [x] right now, you don't love me" graduated ever so slowly until it was "if you don't do [x], I'm gonna kill myself and take the kids with me". Her: "I can't believe you're doing this to us"
/r/MensRights14/04/11 06:19 AM
25

Let's recap: 5 years ago Demonstrably true false-accusation of rape 1 year ago Child abuse Injury to personal property and Resisting a public officer in the case, Prosecutors dismiss arson charge after a jury couldn't reach a verdict This month Assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury likely be upped to felony murder Can someone help me? What the fuck is going on here. Did she get any jail time for the previous crimes? If not jail then some kind of psych ward? I…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:43 AM
5

Oh, I don't know - maybe Michelle, Malia, and Sasha have something to do with it? Or it might be that society still entertains the idea that women are unfairly treated, have no rights, etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 11:27 PM
4

I agree completely. The "clear and convincing" standard gave some protection against these fingerpoint-convictions because the alleged victim was required to provide more evidence, i.e. more than word of mouth, to convict. As to your second point, I believe that men will still flock to pussy. Perhaps they will change once they see someone they know personally suffer the consequences of the new, lesser standard of proof.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 07:35 PM
5

The new standard can be thought along these lines: Picture a scale. On one side is the evidence produced by the alleged victim. On the other side is the evidence produced by the alleged perpetrator. If in your mind the scales are even (50/50) - the alleged victim will lose the case. If the scales tip even one iota (51/49) in favor of the alleged victim - they win the case.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:33 PM
1

The infant likely reacted because Mother was "quickly grabbing something, reaching past [daughter]" The child is 18 months.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 08:15 PM
1

I would advise your friend how you feel. Further, I would recommend he speak with an attorney and file a report with the appropriate State agency about the facebook post. As an aside, it is absolutely unacceptable to post private messages like that on facebook for the world to see. Classless.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 08:10 PM
8

The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee writes, "To diminish a victim's ordeal by branding him/her an accuser essentially questions whether the crime committed against the victim is a crime at all. Robbery, assault, and fraud are all real crimes with real victims, the Republican asserts with this bill." No, branding someone an accuser does not essentially question whether the crime committed against the victim is a crime at all. Since the American system is set up such that one is innocent…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 10:52 PM
4

It appears some have forgotten the 8th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 07:37 PM
5

Indeed we are. One commenter on the original post suggested that women today expect men to respect the tradition and "provide" for them at all times while still going out and being "independent."
/r/MensRights24/01/11 07:02 PM
1

The commitment "tip" set me off. If I choose to be up front with my feelings i.e. that I am not interested in a long term relationship - I deserve that decision to be respected. Just as I would equally respect a woman who, after hearing my position, no longer wants to continue dating because she is seeking a long term partner. According to this author, being true to myself and expressing my feelings is merely a "rationalization and justification for not committing" to a woman I otherwise have no…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:51 PM
5

Most people don't know they are in abusive relationships either. I was in one for nearly all of 2010 and I can say it's been the worst year of the 25 I've been fortunate enough to have. All I can say is that somewhere deep inside, you know that the relationship is awful - and yet you stay. Why? shrink4men.com Censoring your thoughts and feelings. You edit it yourself because you’re afraid of her reactions. Swallowing the lump in your throat and your hurt and anger is easier than dealing with ano…
/r/MensRights22/12/10 02:47 AM
2

Interesting story, thank you for sharing. I think you really hit the nail on the head with your last sentence. In addition to having a level of power, it's as if society conveniently forgets that a woman can be as corrupt and evil as anyone else. After a woman abuses that power, I see men and women alike trying to do whatever necessary to make sure she's justified, excused, and validated for her acts. What's worse, I feel as though men cannot truthfully and publicly speak about their opinions on…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:11 AM
12

Placer County Superior Court Judge Joseph O’Flaherty, who called her extortion attempt “close to the worst crime I’ve seen in my 21 years on the bench.” And she only got 9 years in prison. What's more, is that Yolanda Perez Fryson could have done this to anyone reading this right now. She should be in prison for the rest of her despicable life.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 03:36 PM
1

I certainly don't know the answer to whether this issue belongs in Men's rights or not. However, I will say that this "issue" introduced me to the concept of men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 02:02 AM
1

At this point I believe the man can bring a lawsuit against the woman alleging defamation. From Wikipedia: Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. It is usually a requirement that this claim be fals…
/r/MensRights06/11/10 08:13 PM
2

They have as much right as the woman chooses to give them.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 03:36 AM
1

She was a professor of law at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972. In 1970, she co-founded the Women's Rights Law Reporter, the first law journal in the U.S. to focus exclusively on women's rights.[11] From 1972 until 1980, she taught at Columbia, where she became the first tenured woman and co-authored the first law school casebook on sex discrimination. She also taught in Tulane University Law School's summer-abroad program.[12] Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg I don't doubt the …
/r/MensRights26/10/10 11:30 PM
2

Here take this link and read up: http://shrink4men.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/relationships-with-borderline-narcissistic-personality-women/ To highlight: Censoring your thoughts and feelings. Everything is your fault. Constant criticism. Control freak. Dr Jekyll and Ms Hyde Your feelings don't count. Questioning your own sanity. Isolating yourself from friends and family. Walking on landmines/eggshells. Builds you up, puts you down. She makes the rules and breaks them. You're a loser, but don't le…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter