| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | But..but MGM is not worse than FGM:100% this! Feminists became an obstacle to eliminating male genital mutilation when they campaigned to only ban FGM, while allowing MGM to remain legal. It's clear to me that feminism isn't going to be the force that will eliminate MGM. That's why I have become frustrated with intactivists who are concerned with pleasing feminists. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/01/25 03:28 PM |
| 9 | But..but MGM is not worse than FGM:Of course, BadEmpanda is wrong. Male genital mutilation and female genital mutilation can both be compared to each other. Both MGM and FGM are sexually debilitating mutilations. The reasons why BadEmpanda can't see MGM as debilitating are because he is blinded by cultural inertia and consumed by his own insanity. Furthermore, insanity is one of the primary reasons why MGM continues to occur. The other primary reasons why MGM stays alive are misandry and sadism. Another thing that I noticed is th… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/01/25 03:16 PM |
| 13 | Has anyone noticed a lack of awareness for the male anatomy?You're correct in your comment. However, I need to clarify something about male genital mutilation. Like FGM, there are multiple forms of MGM too. Contrary to popular belief, foreskin amputation isn't the only form of MGM. Another notable form of male genital mutilation is penile subincision in which the underside of the penis is slit open and also includes cutting open the urethra. Penile subincision sometimes includes total amputation of the foreskin and bifurcation of the glans. This form of … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/03/24 09:01 PM |
| 57 | Has anyone noticed a lack of awareness for the male anatomy?The worldwide acceptance and tolerance of male genital mutilation (particularly in powerful countries such as the United States and Israel) is definitely a contributing factor to the lack of awareness for the male anatomy, especially in regards to sexual function and physiology. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/03/24 08:24 AM |
| 3 | ‘Male circumcision’ and ‘female genital mutilation’: why parents choose the procedures and the case for gender bias in medical nomenclatureI like this study because it conveys an extremely important truth. The truth that this study is conveying is that the word "mutilation" always implies a negative value judgment. Here's the thing, there are many intactivists that refuse to refer to male genital cutting as "male genital mutilation". That's because some intactivists are trying to placate the feelings of pro-cutters in their societies so then pro-cutters won't feel alienated by intactivists. Here's a newsflash for the intactivist th… | /r/Male_Studies | 20/03/24 12:14 PM |
| 7 | Circumcision is a term used to normalize genital mutilation.They opposed the MGM ban because it puts both MGM and FGM on equal footing. Feminist seems to hate it when MGM and FGM are put on a level playing field, that's why they don't like calling male genital cutting "MGM". Thus, German feminists also opposed the MGM ban because they MGM isn't comparable to FGM and they think FGM is worse. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/02/24 01:09 PM |
| 4 | Circumcision is a term used to normalize genital mutilation.It's obvious that the word "circumcision" is an euphemistic term that is used to normalize genital mutilation. What's also important to note is that the term "circumcision" is a word used in order to appease or pacify pro-cutting humans. The problem is that when it comes to male genital mutilation (MGM), intactivists are too concerned about alienating and offending people. That's because there are many intactivists that refuse to use the term "mutilation". However, when it comes to female genita… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/02/24 06:57 AM |
| 28 | Have you watched Karen Straugan's YouTube video "Feminism and the disposable male". The cancel policy on MRA.Feminists will only advocate for men's rights issues if the said issue significantly affects women. If the men's issue doesn't significantly affect women, feminists will turn a blind eye to that issue. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 07:18 AM |
| 5 | The Hypocrisy of CircumcisionRich countries defend male genital mutilation because of cognitive dissonance. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/12/23 09:22 AM |
| 13 | The Hypocrisy of CircumcisionFemale genital cutting is referred to as "female genital mutilation" (FGM), while male genital cutting is referred to as "circumcision" because most feminists (in particular hypocritical FGM opponents) in rich countries dislike when female genital mutilation is put on equal or fair footing to male genital mutilation (MGM). These hypocritical FGM opponents hate when male genital cutting is referred to as male genital mutilation because they believe that recognizing male genital cutting as MGM wea… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/12/23 09:20 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter