TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PhoebusElpollo Archive

View 4 posts and 203 comments by PhoebusElpollo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well yeah, but I think it's kind of unfair for her to have to pay more for extremely necessary clothes (underwear), when the boy doesn't have to.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:32 PM
1

Kind of sounds like you're dismissing my point, just because I don't have children, which is a pretty shitty thing to do.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:31 PM
2

Depends on how expensive the accessories were, if they were just 15 bucks, that's not enough to buy a bra, if they were 30 or more, then it is pretty stupid. Although I suppose some women might think that accessories are necessary as well. And obviously it's not the boys fault, but with my "solution" (the parents pay for all of their underwear) neither child gets an unfair advantage
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:25 PM
1

I do not, I was one though
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:23 PM
1

No it isn't but they'll realise for themselves that they'll have to pay for that stuff later, my parents are actually providing for basically every need, they're paying for uni, and they'll even pay (part of) my rent. That doesn't mean I'll be incapable of doing it myself, it means they're just helping me along right now. As for what makes it unfair, it's that you did nothing on purpose to get that cancer, but it still fucks up a big part of your life, in my book, that's not fair.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:48 AM
2

I'm sorry, I'm not actually sure what you mean with this comment
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:27 PM
1

Then how come my friend who is pretty skinny has breasts with cup D? It's not just their weight, it's genetics too. I'm done arguing and I really hope you're just a shitty troll
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:20 PM
2

Yes, if you got cancer and I didn't that would be unfair, nothing to do about it, but still unfair. Just like it's unfair that some people are smarter than others, not saying that we should do anything about it, but it's still unfair. And yes, I woukd sacrifice a part of my earnings, it's called tax and healthcare. I'm not saying the boy should get less than 300 dollars, I'm saying the parents should pay for both of their necessities, like underwear (including bra's) within reason, then let them…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:16 PM
3

That's not how breasts work... You can be skinny with huge breasts or fat with smaller oned.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:14 PM
3

Obviously in the future she'll need to pay for her own bras, however I don't think she should have to pay for them now, in the future she'll have an "unfair" extra expense (in addition to tampons/pads) so in my opinion the best would be to make it fair now. Just like I think she shouldn't have to pay for her own tampons or pads now.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:23 PM
2

Those aren't cheaper and pretty uncomfortable
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:13 PM
3

How do you know how expensive a comfortable bra is? I don't know either, but I've seen women say on reddit how expensive a good bra is.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:37 PM
5

Nothing, the daughter NEEDS bras, the son doesn't have that extra expense.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:35 PM
3

But the son didn't have to sacrifice looking good for being comfortable, he doesn't need to buy bras, the daughter does.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:34 PM
-1

But it's not like men never do that, it's not only a thing that women do, your comment kind of implies that no woman can be trusted with contraception.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:31 PM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:48 PM
3

/r/bigdickproblems
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:01 PM
1

Do you have any of those later videos?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:13 AM
2

I think you posted this on the wrong sub buddy
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:46 AM
1

No one gets to define what it is to be a man
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:45 AM
1

I'm pretty sure Taika was just joking with the piece of meat comment, because just like people like Ryan Reynolds, he's basically a comedian all the time. And the largest problem for Hemsworth was that he didn't want to have to exercise again, it had nothing to do with showing his body
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:53 PM
1

I almost got expelled from school for following my biological imperatives. Right, not to be a dick, but this kind of sounds like that allegation might not have been false, may I ask what you did? Also, just because women didn't support you and stabbed you in the back doesn't mean all women do that, to say that they do is insanely sexist. Women have evolved not to care about men. Not how evolution works, if women evolved not to care about men, they wouldn't fall in love with them, meaning no chil…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:10 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:24 PM
1

I don't really care about the law in this case, /r/AmItheAsshole is about morals and stuff, not the law. It's still insanely creepy to climb a roof to spy on your neighbour sunbathing. I agree with you on the other point
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:57 PM
2

I agree with that, if she just had open fences around her backyard or high buildings where you can look out the window and see into her backyard then it's her own damn fault and it's idiotic to expect otherwise, however, if people need to climb a roof to spy on her then it's the kid's fault.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:56 PM
1

I don't think there's anything wrong with admiring another human being either, however, saying this is just admiring another human being is taking it waay to lightly. He climbed up on a roof to watch her half naked body without her consent. It's one thing to see someone and think "damn she's hot" or even "she's got a nice rack", and a whole other thing to go out of your way to basically spy on someone. I agree that it's important to know the layout of the backyard, but since he had to climb on t…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:35 PM
0

yeah, it's going to decrease, but it's still there, it does depend on how it was situated, for example, if there had been a window in the roof of the house or there's a flat nearby, but from the story, it doesn't seem like there was, so I think the woman could expect some privacy. Besides, wether she can expect that privacy or not, the son in the story still had to go to climb on top of a roof, just to see some tiddies, so I think it's reasonable for that woman to assume that she was privacy if …
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:39 PM
1

Which exact statistics are you referring to?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:54 AM
3

Where did you get that idea? There are definitely women who don't think about their significant other, and I do agree that there is a lot more media telling men to care about/for their girlfriends, but that doesn't mean that in all/most relationships the woman doesn't care about her partner.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:09 AM
2

The father should be punishing his son, he invaded someones privacy, while they were in their own backyard, for an entire week, that's really messed up, and while it is understandable as a boy, he should learn that behavior is not okay. Don't get me wrong, the mom and neighbour are overreacting as well, saying that he should be in intensive psycho therapy.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:06 AM
5

That's a little bit sexist, don't you think?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:01 AM
0

Wasn't she the leader or something? I think that it's fair to say she made it possible if she led it, I'm pretty sure this was cleared up a while ago
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:40 AM
1

Where'd she do that?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:39 AM
12

What the fuck, why are you being downvoted? You just asked a simple question
/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:20 AM
0

calling people retarded doesn't help anyone and it definitely doesn't promote a normal discussion
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:45 AM
1

Luckily most of the comments actually agree with us that she's wrong
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:15 AM
1

Alright, then it makes more sense to say, depends on what the other was saying
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:04 PM
1

you were downvoted because it had very little to do with the post, you were just saying it to make a point about something else, and myself and apparently other think that's very annoying. I do agree that people who say men are trash are dickheads, but I think most of reddit would agree with me on that
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:18 PM
11

I couldn't find it, because I don't remember the exact title of the post, but I'm 100% sure I've seen it, I've seen a lot more for women, but I have seen one or two for men as well
/r/MensRights23/06/19 10:33 AM
34

I have seen things like these on reddit before, for men as well :)
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:59 PM
4

Chef by Jon Favreau
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:03 PM
1

But what does that have to do with this post?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 07:23 PM
4

Where? What? How is this sexist?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:31 AM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights15/05/19 04:43 PM
1

Do you maybe have a source for that CDC claim?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 09:11 AM
1

well, if they actually thought their dates were rapists, they wouldn't go on a date with them, this would just be making sure to be safe. It's possible that their date is a rapist, and there's no real downside to making sure your friends know that you're safe.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:49 AM
1

Yeah, but I don't really agree that it was rape, maybe technically it was, but he said that he had no problem with her having sex with him while he was sleeping, but that the problem was that he woke up.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 06:02 PM
1

Where's the men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:19 PM
10

Because these aren't really the kind of questions you ask in askreddit
/r/MensRights07/04/19 10:48 AM
0

What about the skrull guy? and as far as I remember it's not like Fury was totally helpless or something, he helped a lot.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 10:48 AM
1

What are you going in about? man-eating just means that it eats humans, and just because she is a feminist, doesn't mean she believes all men are abusive. It's pretty ironic that you presumed that just because she's a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:03 AM
0

And? And what? She didn't want four children, she wanted two, so she wants to abort two of them. So, you would kill any girl children? Well, let's start out by saying I don't really consider it killing, and if I don't change my opinion about wanting children, I would want to abort all children I might have, but if my SO was carrying quadruplets and we couldn't handle that, I think I would abort one of both genders, and if we had twins, and we couldn't handle that I would probably prefer to abort…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:21 PM
0

But she doesnt want four children, i think in the OP she said she couldnt handle it emotionally/financially. who wants boys. I dont want kids but if I did I would prefer boys
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:00 PM
1

I mean, there are a lot of parents who want a certain gender, the genders are different, and if you have a boy there's a way higher chance he'll want to play football and play fights, and if you have a girl, there's a way higher chance she'll like dolls and stuff like that. If you have to abort two of your quadruplets, and you want to play with dolls with your children, it would be better to abort the boys, because there's just a larger chance you'll get to do what you want to.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:16 AM
1

I'm pretty sure this was a post on reddit, on AITA
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:14 AM
-1

Obviously, but he isn't making it
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:08 PM
-2

Well, I mean, it is the strain on her body, obviously it's probably hard for the man too, but it's a fact that the woman is creating the human being, once the man has impregnated her, technically he's no longer necessary to make the kid.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 11:04 AM
1

Where's that research? Sounds interesting
/r/MensRights18/03/19 08:37 PM
1

Yep, I agree with that.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:54 PM
1

Yeah, i agree that men's health in itself is obviously a men's issue, for example circumcision and prostate cancer, but I don't really think obesity is specifically a men's issue, I don't think there is any reason to focus on it especially affecting men.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:44 PM
2

No, health needs to become an issue immediately, I'm sorry, but this has very little to do with men's rights. This is just shitty health in general, just like domestic violence isn't a men's issue or a women's issue, it's just an issue, it's not gendered.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:52 PM
3

What? I've never heard of this, do you have an article or a link to the tweet?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:19 AM
1

well, the entire sub is already quarantined, so it's basically meaningless
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:42 PM
8

It was pretty good actually, there's very little annoying feminism, just one or two comments about how they couldn't serve the US Air force because they were women, which was true back then.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:21 AM
1

just most posts honestly, referring to women as "roasties" and they're just basically a deep pit of sadness, it kind of makes me angry and sad at the same time.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:09 PM
2

/r/Braincels
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:28 PM
1

I think incel doesn't necessarily mean a virgin, or someone who's angry towards women, but it's more someone who does actually believe women are just holes, who only want hot men who beat them instead of someone who loves them. basically a next level nice guy
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:10 PM
-2

It was an example, and she used that specific example, because she had mentioned earlier that i believe 60 percent of all reviewers were white males. Now, I personally don't think it's weird if a white man reviews a movie made for black people (because apparently, she said it was for (teen) women of color, not for children, so sorry for that). And I do think it's weird that movies are apparently made for certain groups and ethnicities. However, I don't think she was sexist or racist.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:00 AM
-4

Where did she insinuate that? She only said she didn't care what white adult men had to say because A wrinkle in time was made for kids
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:47 AM
1

Why? I thought it was a really good and enjoyable film
/r/MensRights10/03/19 07:46 PM
1

I mean, the press tour thing is pretty weird but understandable, but she never said the thing about not wanting white men to review her superhero movie, she said she didn't really care about what adult men had to say about a wrinkle in time, because it was a kids movie.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:54 AM
1

Nope, and I don't really know why you're asking, because I'm against circumcision too
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:49 PM
4

It does have some benefits, but so does female circumcision, removing the tonsils, or the appendix, we don't remove them either. Also, circumcision isn't totally safe, and you can end up with a fucked up penis or even a dead kid. And the foreskin is pretty important in sex, it adds to the sensitivity and I think it also helps with lubrication.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:41 PM
3

Because it's not that hard to clean it, so there's no reason to cut it off, it's not like it makes you immune to STD's and HIV, you still need to use condoms, and it decreases sensitivity during sex.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:28 PM
3

He's saying you're a troll
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:27 PM
1

Where's it been debunked? I'm just wondering, I'm against circumcision as well, but I'm pretty sure UNICEF did some research or something on the results of circumcision and correlation to HIV
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:26 PM
3

I mean I agree, I haven't really seen anyone hijack IWD to talk about men's issues, but they should keep not doing it, there's a reason there are 2 separate days. The only thing that you could maybe mention on IWD is how IMD gets way less attention
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:23 PM
0

Well why not, they clearly do recognise it, UNESCO recognises it, UNESCO is a part of the UN, thus the UN recognises it, and as I said I agree it's pretty weird that it's not on that page.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:07 AM
1

Well it's recognised by UNESCO, which belong to/is a part of the UN, so by extension it's recognised by the UN. However, it is weird that it isn't in that list. although the UN did create world toilet day, so i would make sense they would recognise it.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:39 AM
1

I mean, it's a pretty funny joke
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:57 PM
0

Both? International Men's Day is celebrated in over 80 countries,[8] on 19 November, and global support for the celebration is broad.[8][3] International Men's Day is followed by Universal Children's Day on 20 November, forming a 48-hour celebration of men and children, respectively. Additionally, the month of November is also occasionally recognized as International Men's Month. International Men's Day is supported by a variety of organisations including UNESCO.[14] Speaking on behalf of UNESCO…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:22 PM
-4

In my experience, men feel way less threatened than women, my female friends are so afraid of biking alone at night, they often won't do it at all if there's no one who will go with them. I think the chances of being attacked/followed at night is way smaller for men then for women.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:32 AM
-4

Is it also crowded at night? The difference in security is probably that men don't come into the women's parking lot, so women feel less threatened
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:36 AM
-8

This is actually something I can understand, because women often feel threatened in parking lots, this will help them feel a bit more safe.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:01 AM
3

I think it's a good idea, at least women's day, I think a whole month defeats the purpose. But I think it's a good idea, because it sets aside a day where we can raise awareness about issues concerning women, just like international men's day should be a day on which we can raise awareness about men's issues.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:57 AM
1

Do you have a source for this? because the only one i know of is is the one from 1996 or something, and I think that's pretty outdated. That one also says that it also counts unfounded/baseless reports as false, so that might skew the results a bit.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:13 AM
1

Well, they can't keep on showing the same figures over and over, if that's what you mean, this was probably on an article about campus rape or something like that.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:07 PM
1

they're pointing that out because that's still a huge number, it should be 0%, it's insane if 6,4% of college men rape someone, but it's not that weird if the statistic were 93,6% of college men don't rape, the important part is that 6,4%
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:11 PM
1

No it isn't this is on trollxchromosomes, it's a joke
/r/MensRights24/02/19 05:49 PM
2

I don't think there's anything wrong with "objectification" if someone has a nice body you can admire that without immediately thinking the only value of that person is their body.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:09 PM
3

I've never seen anyone rant about how there is nothing positive, and I obviously don't have a problem with positive posts on this sub, but they should still have something to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:53 PM
3

Yeah, I guess that's true
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:53 PM
0

This has nothing to do with men's rights though
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:36 PM
1

This is made up, The OP is pretty aggressive in the comments, calling women dumb broads, this is his only post ever and the account was made yesterday, that's all really suspicious. I'm not saying stuff like this doesn't happen, but I'm 98% sure that this particular instance isn't actually true.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 10:15 AM
1

her
/r/MensRights20/02/19 10:03 AM
0

Yeah, in this article there is nothing about men needing to change and there is no peculiar mention of being a man, you're just making up problems now.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:53 PM
2

So, thay's why people say don't have kids.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 11:11 AM
-2

No it doesn't.... Then why did you ask? Just because I'm young doesn't mean I have no perspective or experience, how is assuming that the article will bash on men just because it's written by a women anything but sexist? Even if most articles written by women bash on men, it's still sexist to assume that this one is too
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:11 AM
0

I am, but that doesn't/shouldn't matter to you.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:44 PM
1

no?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:17 PM
1

Depends on what "this" is, I disagree with you that this person is complaining, they're just saying that there is some toxic stuff here
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:04 PM
1

What is the sub-we-don't-link-to?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 07:28 PM
-3

To me it seems pretty clear that that woman is just giving a press conference or something like that, as for the authors being women, assuming that they will focus on men having to change and the shooter being a man, it seems pretty sexist to me.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:51 PM
2

What if your wife abuses you? What if your wife turns into a bitch? What if you just don't click anymore? What if your wife wants a divorce? What if you just don't want to get married for any reason?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:29 PM
1

Ask a doctor?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:27 PM
0

Wtf are you talking about, they aren't complaining at all, they asked a legitimate question, you are actually proving this person right with this comment.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:26 PM
0

I think there's some toxic stuff, , there is definitely sexist content here, and also stuff that's almost like feminism because it's just bitching about nothing. However, the core of the subreddit, and most people/posts here are still about men's rights and helping men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:23 PM
2

privilege* ;)
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:03 PM
-2

What? Why are you just assuming that that's what the narrative will focus on from a headline? I'm sorry, but this seems exactly like the kind of shit a feminazi would say.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:58 PM
1

What was this about?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:48 PM
4

THANK YOU, there is so much stuff on this sub that has very little to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:20 PM
0

This has nothing to do with men's rights, it's just an insane woman, the reaction would probably be pretty similar if it was a man
/r/MensRights11/02/19 09:14 PM
1

what does this have to do with men's rights? It's a dum ad, but it has literally nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:56 PM
2

cool, didn't know that, thanks
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:27 PM
2

Ty
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:12 PM
12

Thanks, but I meant the comment itself, not the actual post, I actually read it before it was removed
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:59 AM
2

It doesn't matter who is forcing people to sign up for the draft, men can oppress men, women can oppress women
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:47 AM
1

What? Sorry but this is bs, this is just a comedy song, the point is that most of those guys don't exist, the next verse is actually the exact same thing, but for women.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:36 AM
34

What was the original comment?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:18 AM
7

American pediatrics association. Ah lmao, messed up there. America is the only Western country to do cutting on a mass scale of all its boys whether they need it or not. Everywhere else it happens are places you'd expect that kinda shit to happen (israel Africa and the middle east) I know, but that doesn't really have anything to do this, even if I was American, it doesn't mean that I can't know anything about circumcision. For the record, I don't agree with circumcision, I think it's completely…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 10:15 PM
13

Thank you for your response as to your first statement at pills, yes they suck but I don't think changed emotions during the day changes their actual physical sensitivity and pleasure Even though the pill might not change their sexual pleasure (which it could, no idea if it does, but it could, also depends on the type of pill she's taking) it most likely changes libido, and I would gladly have a little bit less sensitivity during sex instead of being moody and having my emotions all out of wack.…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 09:51 PM
66

-guys must wear a tight ass rubber balloon over their penis that can kill their boner and make them barely feel anything otherwise their life is ruined Women need to take pills which fuck with their hormones and emotions -guys must make sure odor and grooming is under control at all times Women need to think about their odor too, and they shave their legs and armpits, which men don't. -men are often circumcised which leads to less pleasure and nerve endings and overall pleasure. And no natural l…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:24 PM
2

This is satire...
/r/MensRights08/02/19 12:48 PM
1

It's easier to prove a negative in this case, because to prove you didn't rape someone a month later, you can give an alibi or something like that, while a month later, most if not all traces of a rape will most likely be gone. As for your question about where I was in the year 2000, half of me did not exist while the other half was inside my mother.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 10:26 PM
1

In the context of the FBI report the clearance rate means that the charges were laid against the accused, besides just because only 2,17% of reported rape accusations are proven to be true and 8% are proven to be false, doesn't mean that the other 89,83% doesn't matter anymore, I can imagine that it's easier to prove that a rape didn't happen than it is to prove that it did happen, especially after some time has passed. Also, that FBI report is from 1996, that's 23 years ago, so that's not reall…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:55 PM
1

In the RAINN article I only see the 5/1000 and the 4,6/1000 statistics, I may just be blind but I can't see it. However, in that FBI report it does say that 52% of all rape allegations are cleared, meaning there is most likely some evidence for the charge.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:44 PM
1

What is 9/11? It was a tragic event where aircraft were used as weapons of terror. 9/11 wasn't the first and hasn't been the last of these kinds of terrorist acts involving aircraft. 9/11 is not a singular event. Terrorism is an ongoing problem. Likewise, false accusations are an ongoing problem. I wasn't talking about all terrorism, I was talking about 9/11, people still talk about 9/11 (at least from what I've seen on the internet, I'm not American, so I don't know how much it is discussed in …
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:37 PM
1

If something as serious and life-damaging as false accusations is happening enough for it to be this widely discussed, you bet your ass I"m going to pay attention and take the necessary precautions. Just because it's widely discussed doesn't mean it happens a lot, 9/11 was widely discussed, but it only happened once, it's widely discussed because it's horrible if it does happen, not because it happens a lot. I limit my interactions with women to bare minimums. I ensure each interaction takes pla…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:06 AM
1

Could you give me a link or an article showing these statistics because I can't really find it
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:37 AM
1

Where did you get that statistic from? Also, no i'm not saying that, I am saying that a woman shouldn't worry that much about being alone with a man because he might rape her. I might worry about being alone with a woman that I don't know at all, or a woman who is angry at me, just like I wouldn't want to sleep somewhere where there were people who I don't know out of fear they might do something to me in my sleep. I'm not saying don't worry about being raped/falsely accused at all, I'm saying t…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:22 PM
2

That doesn't explain why it's an overreaction. I think it's an overreaction because I don't think the risk of being falsely accused is that high (although I don't have any stats to back this up, if you have any I would love to see them) Except there is. Never be alone with them. I meant there is nothing to do about the possibility of them being angry in the future, and I think the reward for being alone with a woman can certainly be larger than the change that they may be angry at you at some po…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:06 PM
2

Why? Because women can be cool and nice people who are fun to be around, just like men can be cool and nice people who are fun to be around. And the fact that she may be angry at you at some point in the future? I think there's nothing you can do about that and just take the risk, and if I think a woman could accuse me of sexual assault, I wouldn't want to be around that type of woman anyway, because that's hugely immoral and shitty behavior, so I would avoid that type of person anyway.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:35 PM
1

Well then, do you know how many people do get accused of rape? Because I don't hear about it that often, so unless you have any proof that shows me that I was indeed wrong with my estimation of how many false sexual assault justifications there are, you don't have a leg to stand on either. If you do have some proof, I would be happy to change my viewpoint.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:08 PM
1

But there aren't many people who get accused of rape as far as I know, there are some who are, but most men who have been alone with a woman haven't been accused of sexual assault, this is a bad analogy, because driving drunk has direct implications on your driving skills, while just being alone with a woman doesn't have a huge effect on the chances of her accusing you of assault. Like I said before on a different comment, if the woman in question has reason to be mad at you, then you should wat…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 03:41 PM
1

It is enforced, just not all the time, that does need to change, but I believe that it's an exaggeration to try to never be alone with any woman just because she might accuse you of rape, it's another thing if that woman is angry at you for some reason.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 12:18 PM
1

I agree, however in this specific instance I don't think it's necessary to worry about a sexual assault allegation
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:15 AM
0

I agree, however in this instance, I don't think this guy needs to worry about him getting a sexual assault allegation, as that woman didn't seem angry at all (of course I wasn't there, but from what the OP said she didn't seem angry)
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:04 AM
1

I'm not saying ignore it, I'm saying don't worry about it with every single woman
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:58 AM
0

yeah I agree, but in this specific instance, there was nothing to suggest that woman would accuse him of rape/sexual assault, she was asked to stop hitting him, she said sure and that's it
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:58 AM
-1

How? She was playfully hitting someone, when he asked her to stop, she said sure and she did stop (as far as we know)
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:56 AM
1

It may enable the insanity of some women more than it enables the insanity of men, but it's not like society allows every single insane woman to just falsely accuse people of rape, it's still illegal/punished
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:55 AM
0

A false rape accusations isn't legal
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:54 AM
2

Right, thank you for actually taking the time to explain this clearly, I do understand and agree with this, I'm not saying false accusations don't happen, however, I do still think that it's wrong to immediately assume that you'll be falsely accused of rape or be worried about being alone with a woman just because you were asking her to stop playfully hitting you.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:53 PM
1

I gave you an example, the image in my post was my example. Honestly, I don't know how bad it is in the professional world, but I do have to apologize for making it seem like I meant the whole sub, I understand why you would think that, but I didn't mean to attack the subreddit, just the type of people who are this extreme about false rape accusations
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:26 PM
3

A. You're wrong B. Cool that you can see the future. C. It's a joke subreddit /r/FuckYouKaren D. I suppose the things that you're saying could be true, although I would like some examples/proof. And just because women are incentivized to do that, doesn't mean they will, it's not like women are immoral beings who just do what's best for themselves, they have their own morals and just because some are cunts doesn't mean all of them are. Also, just because some women got out of murder charges by bu…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:12 PM
0

That's most certainly not what I'm doing, I'm actually kind of pissed of right now, I was just simply shocked at the people who responded to that comment and the people in this thread who are so afraid of women accusing them of rape that they won't be in the same room with them, I do kind of agree that it sounded a bit like I was calling out the entire sub, but I didn't really know how to phrase it otherwise
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:54 PM
2

Again, not what I was doing, I was just kind of shocked by the response my comment got, and I really don't appreciate you saying I was implying anything, I was just saying that from what I saw, and what I have partly seen on this thread as well, that there are quite some people on this sub who are so scared of women accusing them of rape that they wouldn't be alone with them in a room. To me that's pretty problematic.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:52 PM
0

but you're not constantly moments from being accused of rape, it is indeed possible, and tbh I don't know exactly how often it happens, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't happen that often
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:35 PM
1

Yeah okay, that's true, although, from the post i got the impression it was mostly playful, not because she was actually mad
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:34 PM
1

That's not at all what I am or was doing, I said " If we don't want to become like feminists, we have to keep an open mind, and not think of every single woman as an insane bitch who will accuse you of rape and take your kids" I didn't say we were all already like that or that we were all becoming like that, I said, or at least I meant, that we do need to watch ourselves, so there is no chance of us becoming like that. And what I said in my comment, was simply that just because she's a woman who…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:33 PM
2

Well that's exactly what I'm saying, I want to make sure that we don't become bizarro feminists, but from the image that I posted it seems we may be becoming them
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:03 PM
0

well that's what I'm saying, that's exactly my point, I only said that they shouldn't assume she would accuse him of sexual assault just because she was a woman alone with him, which to me seems pretty reasonable, but I got like 20 downvotes for it
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:02 PM
-2

I'm not saying that it's not possible, I'm saying that it's an exaggeration to try to never be alone with any woman because you're afraid she'll accuse you of rape
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:00 PM
1

So? All people can murder someone, all people can rape someone, I don't get your point.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:24 PM
1

What exactly do we not do? to recognise what?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:22 PM
-2

Yeah, I understand that, but it just seems like such a huge step to take from playfully hitting someone (albeit in a weird place and with too much force) to accusing someone of sexual assault, it's not like women have no morals
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:49 PM
-4

It is if you're wearing seatbelts in your house because you're afraid of the house coming down
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:48 PM
-2

I think it's still an exaggeration, I would hate it if my friends/coworkers wouldn't be alone with me anymore because they're afraid I would rape them.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:42 PM
-4

I know, but you can't live your live in fear, I know there are women who would accuse you of sexual assault, but if you constantly live in fear of being alone with any woman, you aren't really living are you? It's not fair to women either, just because some of their gender are absolutely insane, men won't be alone with them anymore.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:22 PM
1

Which comment? My first one or the second one?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:56 AM
-4

Well that's unnecessarily rude, not productive in any way, kind of pathetic if I'm honest
/r/MensRights02/02/19 07:12 PM
-10

Yeah, I agree that it's weird, but I think that it would've been way more obvious if she actually did it with malicious intent. She still shouldn't do it, but I think it was just a semi-playful reaction to the "mean" joke
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:21 PM
-12

I mean it seemed pretty clear to me it was meant playfully (not making it right), from the way he wrote it it doesn't seem like she had any malicious intent
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:11 PM
-17

Calm down, there was nothing here to suggest that she would claim that he sexually assaulted her, not all women are deranged bitches
/r/MensRights02/02/19 03:57 PM
1

why are you ignoring trans people?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:32 PM
1

That is an insane article, but a few articles on why to hate men doesn't mean that masculinity is currently defined as the things you said it is
/r/MensRights30/01/19 07:20 AM
1

Well no, but that seems like it's a bit of an exaggeration, but to be honest, that has actually helped a bit in understanding why we care, I think I had the wrong definition in my head, thanks!
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:01 PM
1

you could watch the red pill movie
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:33 AM
1

ah alright, thanks
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:30 PM
1

Alright, thanks for the explanation
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:22 AM
1

Of course not, and I don't agree with the OP that they should immediately be banned/removed, I'm just saying that the people who were just writing that case off as another case where a horrible woman gets off just because she's a woman should just look at it a bit more closely.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:20 AM
1

Yeah, of course, sorry
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:17 AM
1

As I have said in another thread, I realise that toxic masculinity is the wrong term for what I actually want to say. However, I wasn't labeling rude people as exhibiting toxic masculinity, I was calling a specific type of rude behavior toxic masculinity, namely the shaming of men for liking feminine things and not being tough
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:16 AM
1

Yeah, that's true but I think they were talking about people like in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ae25fl/prostitute_murders_sleeping_man_robs_him_serves/edm3wo7/
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:06 PM
1

I put scare quotes around 'research', not full quotes like you did. Is there a difference? If so, what is it? That's not what "being alone" means. I'm pretty sure that's what it means in this context, what do you think it means? Yeah, but it's becoming more and more anti-male. Apparently laws are changing in the UK which makes it legal for women to kill their husbands if they claim physiological abuse, and in Australia, your GF now has rights to half your stuff (as if you were married) even if y…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:03 PM
1

I'm sorry but I don't understand what you're saying here: and that the behaviours Feminists Motte and Bailey to when called. Are you using motte and bailey as a verb? It would be reasonable to argue that the issue is a toxic lack of masculinity What do you mean by that? If you mean that men should be more masculine, I couldn't agree less, I think men should be exactly as they want to be, wether that's tough, flamboyant or none of the above.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:55 PM
1

A good example is this post.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:50 PM
1

“Because of the way many men have been brought up—to be self-sufficient and able to take care of themselves—any sense that things aren’t OK needs to be kept secret,” Rabinowitz says. “Part of what happens is men who keep things to themselves look outward and see that no one else is sharing any of the conflicts that they feel inside. That makes them feel isolated. They think they’re alone. They think they’re weak. They think they’re not OK. They don’t realize that other men are also harboring pri…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:31 PM
1

yes, but by toxic masculinity I don't mean that it's men doing it, I'm using toxic masculinity as certain people think men should be, I'm not calling the shaming part toxic masculinity, I mean to be calling the concept of thinking that men should be that way toxic masculinity. However, now that I'm thinking some more about it I'm realising why it's a pretty weird term to say what I'm trying to say
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:19 PM
1

I don't really think they meant it like that, but I understand why someone would. Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:53 PM
2

Well, I'm not american, and I think most of the girls in my year/school probably haven't had sex yet, and I'm basically 100% sure my friends haven't, so slutshaming is kind of hard when most people are virgins. However, the girls of whom I know they've had sex aren't slutshamed as far as I know. (Although I'm not close to them at all, so I'm not 100% sure on that). As for the other things, I don't think many people are savagely bullied anymore in my school. (I am in quite a "high ranked" level i…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:52 PM
2

I'm not shaming anyone dude, I'm not saying only men contribute to toxic masculinity, I am just using toxic masculinity as a term to describe shaming a man for certain behaviors which are considered stereotypically female, I never claimed it's just men who do this (although I do understand why you would think that because of the "another man" part)
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:50 PM
2

I know for a fact that girls do too, but I think that's more looked down upon, for example slutshaming has basically been "outlawed", while I think that shaming a men for, for example, baking is more "acceptable"
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:16 PM
0

In what way does it not?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:13 PM
2

Alright, I guess I can kind of understand where you're coming from, but I still think the guidelines overall aren't that bad, they seem to just be focused on logical things, like speaking to men with more sensitivity and I really don't think they deserve this kind of backlash
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:08 PM
2

by liking girly stuff I meant the toxic part is when someone shames another man for liking girly stuff, or when a man shames himself for it. As for the having to act tough, by that I meant just trying to impress others, which I think is the definition of being tough. And I think there are a lot of men who think it is important to act cool or tough for other people to be more manly. And i'm not saying that all men are emotional, but even if you just look around on reddit, you can see how and wher…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:03 PM
1

I think he just worded some things wrong, doesn't mean he's a troll, also, he literally gave an example of the terrible attitude. I agree that we shouldn't ban everyone who won't provide adequate argumentation, but I think most of us can agree that we do need that adequate argumentation to have a useful discussion.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:07 PM
-1

I'm pretty sure you're right about the story, but I'm also pretty sure that girl was practically raised as a prostitute, which in my opinion means we should give her some leeway (I hope I used that correctly)
/r/MensRights10/01/19 06:20 PM
1

what was the post your crossposted?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:38 PM
1

beating someone up is indeed the same thing as bullying someone for opening up
/r/MensRights10/01/19 06:34 AM
1

Alright thanks, and I understand what you're coming from, but this specific comic is using the, what is in my opinion, correct definition, so I just don't get how this is a negative or anti men's rights comic, it seems to just be spreading the "correct" meaning of toxic masculinity. Shouldn't we be trying to spread this comic, so more people understand what toxic masculinity "should" mean?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 08:11 PM
0

It depends on who you're telling to open up, if it's just a random guy on the internet maybe you shouldn't, but if it's a close friend who you're with often, I think you should. I don't really have personal experience with men opening up so I haven't seen any reactions either, but I think at least in my environment very little people would react poorly, and when they do they would most likely immediately be told off. Also, I think most people won't open up to just anyone, wether they're male or …
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:53 PM
-5

So try to make the world the way we want it to be, if you see someone open up, commend them for it, and if you see someone calling them a sissy, a girl or whatever, try to explain to them why what they're doing is wrong and if they respond negatively try to cut them out or ignore them
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:03 PM
-2

I think men should be more open about our feelings, I would never ever abuse someone when they were to open up, and tbh I can't believe any of my friends would either. Just because people do abuse men when they open up, doesn't mean we shouldn't open up, we should try to explain to those people why what they're doing is hypocritical and try to change them. And of course, it's wrong that people who are just trying to create an office of men's health get sent death threats, but honestly, that's to…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:30 PM
-6

Why the fuck do you care what other people want to do with their bodies? Also, they don't "chop of their dick" they change it into a vulva/clitoris.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:41 PM
-4

What? That's just wrong, men should be able to open up, when men can't show emotion, that damages their mental health, if your male friends were shunned for them showing emotion, tell the people who shun them they're dicks and they're fucking up his mental health. DO NOT tell the men to keep their emotions in them
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:39 PM
-1

How is this sexist? This is a comic about showing how wrong it is that people tell men that it's not acceptable to show feelings or do "feminine" things like baking... I don't think this comic is sexist in any way at all, I think this is the exact opposite
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:37 PM
1

hallelujah, thanks lmao
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:14 PM
1

alright, thanks
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:50 PM
2

Was there an actual study done? If so, where can I find it?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:36 PM
1

Are there sauces for this?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 02:53 PM
1

sauces?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 02:53 PM
2

is there proof this is actually because of sexism or anything like that? Boys may just be less intelligent or just worse at the types of test. (I'm not saying we are less intelligent, just wondering why this is)
/r/MensRights19/11/18 02:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter