TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Phrodo_00 Archive

View 0 posts and 452 comments by Phrodo_00 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The judge emphasised her sentence is 'no measure' of a man's life but of her culpability in the offence, Her culpability in the accident was 100% (she was driving over the speed limit and decided to swerve into the sidewalk), so I fail to see how this makes any sense
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:57 PM
2

I'm not a native speaker so I thought it did. I think it's really stupid to leave out biology (same reason I hear about STEAM for the first time).
/r/MensRights10/10/25 08:14 AM
0

What do you mean art? Most careers in Health science are branches of biology. Medicine is part of health science. It absolutely includes hard sciences.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 03:54 AM
-2

Helthsci is STEM too, but it's exactly the part of it with the most female representation.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 12:22 AM
-4

Maybe it would be better if it was true. Rowling was NOT in poverty while writing Harry Potter. She was middle class levels of unemployed.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 12:18 AM
2

Show me any school code for example that defines rape by who is penetrated but also says that a man having sex without giving sex makes him a sexual assault victim. Bro I don't even know what this means. School code defines rape? a man having sex without giving sex? wat? Trying to understand you, in the UK rape is when: A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 07:46 AM
2

Now, to clarify, in a lot of places it's still a crime for a woman to force sex on a man, so consent is still needed. It might be called something other than rape (like sexual assault) and might carry smaller sentences on top of the normal lighter sentences women generally get.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 09:12 AM
15

No. Why would I?
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:13 PM
11

Most people watching women's football are also men already, though
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:35 PM
12

I open doors to men too. Am I also saying a man cannot open his own door? How did I open the door, then?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:32 AM
2

That's not something you can really prevent. It's rare that it absolutely can't be prevented.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 02:38 AM
12

Always has been. The US has counted military age men getting killed as enemy casualties since forever.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 02:37 AM
1

Thanks, I did misread the numbers. It's still 1/8, and most of it is still directed towards men.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:07 AM
2

Yes, men are somewhat more violent (violence by women is not insignificant), but that wasn't your point? You it happens rarely, but 1/51/10 of homicides being woman on man, and 1/41/8 of homicides being committed by women doesn't make it rare, just less common.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:57 PM
2

Does it matter? You're the one that said: men will rarely experience violence from randoms. Women do all the time And this is false. Men are 7 times more likely to be victims of homicies, for example. And they're more likely to be killed by a woman than women are to be killed by anyone Source
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:17 PM
3

What? No. Most victims of violent crime (and violence in general) are men, so they're the ones most victimized by randoms on the street. I'd have to take a look at statistics to be certain, but I bet that most inter-gender violence is DV, for victims of both genders.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 07:01 PM
32

I don't know about Texas, but a lot of consent laws put special restrictions for teachers and authority figures.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 11:25 PM
0

I mean, yes. No law I know of says it's illegal to be creepy. But more importantly, street photography and photojournalism are perfectly legitimate fields and they both rely on being able to take pictures in public.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 08:17 PM
-4

It's not illegal to take pictures of people in public. The rest of it, yes.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 09:37 AM
13

After deliberating, Magistrate Marse Ann Farrugia found the man guilty by his own admission and sentenced him to a one-year jail term suspended for two years. I really don't get why they pleaded guilty. I guess it less work and cheaper, but all of the article points at the guy being innocent.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 03:21 AM
34

Sure, but you should compare percentages out of the total population of people, not out of all murder victims. What this is showing is that while men get unproportionally killed for other than partner violence, they still get killed by their partner 2/3 of the amount women do (not 1/5).
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:42 PM
42

No, comparing those 2 percentages is the misleading statistic. The 5x figure is comparing percentages out of the total of people murdered, not total population. This gets skewed because men are the overwhelming majority of violence victims. If you compare percentages based on total population, you'll get a slightly bigger ratio, actually, since there's more women in the population.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:37 PM
54

Yeah, but comparing percentages in this case is not useful. When you compare the actual numbers, you get 2/3 instead. He showed his math.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:20 PM
2

Donald Trump (a mere politician and businessman) While obviously Trump hasn't committed genocide, you can't just call him a mere politician. He's a convicted felon, traitor, sexual offender, potential rapist and stochastic terrorist.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:48 PM
3

I didn’t vote in this election, because I disagree with democracy at a fundamental level. Being from a country that has gone through the alternatives to democracy, this is all I needed to know this was going to be at least a weird take, and it was (although hey, it could have been worse). I don't know what kind of authoritarian you are, but you can go fuck yourself just for this.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:44 AM
1

How does that make you less wrong?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:07 PM
8

Are you aware you're wrong? Women are the majority of the population and also the mayority of the vote.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:52 PM
14

Gender studies teachers will straight up unironically teach the scum manifesto, and that's considered normal.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:33 PM
1

Even (edit: I mean equal) paternity leave even helps women by getting rid of one of the differences between workers of different gender.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 11:13 PM
7

Yeah, this is why I didn't like the comparison with ear piercing in this post. I'm against any non-consenting (edit: Non-medically necessary) body modification (although of course there's degrees to it)
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:31 PM
8

It's completely possible for women (but rare) to have XY chromosomes. The gene just needs to fail to activate. Look at this for an example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis Also, the genetic testing is not even that trustworthy. It was never revealed officially as the reason for her ban, and was performed by an organization that wasn't trusted by the IOC to organize their sport because of governance issues
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:49 PM
2

/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:44 PM
2

Not really relevant. Other Democrats would have done so too, as well as the overall. Because of voting patterns of the rural vote, only Republicans can realistically win elections without actually getting the most votes
/r/MensRights22/07/24 12:48 AM
11

I mean, most criminals come from unprivileged, sometimes dangerous backgrounds. Women criminals are not at all alone in this.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 04:15 PM
9

Fist clenched when he came out, yelled "Get the fuck away from her. Then he raised up his hands and came back in his apartment. THEN he got tased. I wouldn't have thought it was a problem if he got tased when he first showed up, but by the time he got tased he wasn't demostrating being a threat any more. The cop that tasered him probably got a hard on when he saw him being beligerent and didn't want to end up with blue balls so he he used the taser anyway.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:43 PM
6

Yes, but the problem is that this is fundamentally flawed given that its framed as being for women. If this was framed as self empowerment, some of it would actually be good (but probably not get as many likes on instagram)
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:06 PM
8

Most voters in the US are in fact women.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:42 PM
3

Not even that. Biking next to cars IS unsafe and bikers need better infrastructure. Since it's a risky thing to do, it's done by less risk adverse people, that tend to be (but are not exclusively) men. So, we need better bike infrastructure, but not only because women and old people don't bike if they don't feel safe, but also to keep current users safer.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:00 PM
186

Because UK politicians have explicitly said they want to keep women out of prison as much as possible. Of course, no such sympathy is extended to men. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/targeted-support-for-women-offenders
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:20 PM
27

Maybe, but even if that was true (not super sure myself), teachers are on a position of authority and have coercing powers over their students. It’s similarly gross to letting police have sex with people in custody. (Which actually can be legal in some places from what I remember, sadly)
/r/MensRights27/05/23 07:36 PM
3

wash your dick
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:13 PM
8

Are you also against wisdom teeth removal? Generally yes, if it's not a problem. I have my wisdom teeth and luckily they don't hurt, so no reason to remove them. There's no substancial medical reason for circumcising babies. Men can choose to do it later in life if they want these incredible benefits.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:09 PM
4

It could be neutral. Femininity can be celebrated without comparing it (or putting down) masculinity. In reality this rarely happens, especially in a feminist context.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 07:25 PM
9

men doing an act of courtesy There's a difference between chivalry and courtesy. I open the door for anyone, give my seat in the bus to old or injured people and would rescue children first. No need to involve gender.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 05:33 PM
2

Also, what does It mean to be homosexual when they're non-binary? They like people that are non-binary in the same way?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:24 AM
5

homosexual non-binary man What does this mean? Isn't man a binary gender?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:35 PM
8

Over the years 007 has bedded most of the beautiful women he has come up against. I understand some of Bond's behavior, especially in the early movies can be problematic, but how is this a problem?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 03:25 AM
1

Guys don't like women who... [Citation needed]
/r/MensRights06/03/23 07:45 PM
6

Affirmative action is exactly doing its job. This is what it's designed to do.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 07:06 PM
2

Yes, but there's a difference between paying for sex because you want to vs doing it out of spite.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:04 PM
24

It can also involve a prick to the clitoris or removal of the clitoral hood, which is very comparable to MGM. MGM also reduces sexual satisfaction etc. Like any sane person, I'm against unnecessary medical procedures with no consent, and that includes all form of genital mutilation on children or people under duress. It's incomprehensible to me that someone could have any other position.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:28 AM
4

Also, in the bible (at least the catholic first testament. Not sure what edits were made from the Torah), God is the one that creates Eve, it's not a birth situation (why does everything has to be a literal birth).
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:39 PM
2

What places? Trump was mostly voted by states that don't support abortion (and where men and women have similar views on it, like everywhere else), so that happened. This entire problem was mostly caused by the electoral college and democrats' failure to encode Roe vs Wade in federal law.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:13 PM
1

Like a lot of people have said, I support both or neither (but I wouldn't hold abortion before paper abortions, they can be separate fights). I also think women should be able to do paper abortions. Right now women can decide to give out a child on their own, but I'd add the possibility of having the dad take care of the child (and if neither person wants it, sure, abortion it is)
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:00 PM
7

The gender of legislators doesn't matter as much as you'd think. The values of the voters that put them there are as much, if not more important, and most voters in the US are women (by like, 5%)
/r/MensRights25/11/22 08:57 PM
20

I could see it can happen if it's like a random killing by an stranger, but I agree it's not likely the reason between people that know each other. In that case it's more likely to be personal.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:01 PM
8

I think your other examples are good and pretty shameful. It's good that the mods remove these comments, although I'd prefer it if the community didn't upvote them. I like the pushback in a reply on the first example. But I don't agree with this example. Feminists have constantly aimed to get rid of men's spaces. I haven't been able to find the actual quotation but feminists authors have gone as far as to declare groups of men in general dangerous. First wave feminism made one of its aims to sto…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:38 AM
6

You're basically saying they're only fighting because it will benefit them, not because they think it's the right fight
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:42 PM
4

Saying that minimizes the sacrifice of men literally dying to help women, as is custom.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:28 PM
4

Do you get off calling people creeps or something?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 08:10 PM
-1

You and /u/LowAd3406 are arguing very falsifiable claims. Can either provide a link to your sources?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 09:38 PM
7

That might be her point, but it's not what she's saying.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:00 AM
-20

This is a fallacy. It only means believe no men when weighing their word against that of a woman. It says nothing about a man's word against another man. Confusingly, it also says we should somehow believe women with opposite statements of each other.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:56 PM
1

I looked up the group mentioned in the first link and they are indeed MRA. I don't agree with them, and think that marital rape is rape. Now, given the rejection of gender neutral rape laws by feminists in India, there seems to be a legitimate false reporting problem (I would personally still want a law like that in place regardless). I also wonder how gender-neutral the proposed change to the law was. I couldn't find the actual wording being proposed, if any. I won't even address the second cas…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:47 PM
9

What do random men have to do with MRA?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:20 PM
14

Oh... that's what TW means. I didn't know people used them unironically
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:57 PM
24

The 1 in 4 women statistic is also not obvious. If you only count people sleeping in the street, it's a lot more men
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:26 AM
6

yet no man gives a damn. To be fair, I've hear a lot of complaining about how women prefer taller and wealthier men. I personally think preferring virgin partners is strangely specific, but you do you.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:43 AM
2

The official Reddit admin position is that they don’t care about discrimination of men
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:57 PM
3

I meant driving but as I reply I realize it's more of a privilege. Still.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:31 AM
5

Yes, and American chose to infringe on the rights of all adults 18-21 before actually enforcing and tightening drunk driving laws.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:42 AM
4

No, but I do think it's still rape if they didn't talk about it before hand. Just because there are worse acts it doesn't mean it wasn't
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:53 AM
6

men as a gender haven’t historically been targeted to be marginalized because they look, sound, think and do like men are “supposed” to do, Yes they have. Male only conscription has been a thing for thousands of years. Patternal fraud and the general disposability of the make gender are also as entrenched
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:19 AM
0

How are these 2 comparable? Was the MP killed by the police?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:46 PM
1

Depends on the definition of reversal. From https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/vasectomy-reversal/about/pac-20384537 Pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal will range from about 30% to over 90%, depending on the type of procedure. Almost all vasectomies can be reversed. However, this doesn't guarantee success in conceiving a child. and https://www.vasectomy.com/article/vasectomy/faq/is-a-vasectomy-reversible A vasectomy is intended to be a permanent form of birth control. If you're ha…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:29 AM
2

Yes, my understanding is that most vasectomies after some time (let's say a year) are not reversible, I don't know where the myth that they're mostly reversible that comes from.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 01:30 AM
2

Hence gender nonconforming could be a useful term for the analysis. And this is what I'm disputing. When there's only 10% of difference between groups, how can it be useful to assign a trait to that group? Rather than sociology, this smells of bad sociology.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:57 AM
1

In sociology the concept of gender nonconforming is important to be able to analyze what could be causing phenomenon. I think you're painting with too big of a brush here. Sure there are some commonalities among groups split by random characteristics such as gender, but by large, most of the time you'll find there's more differences than similarities within a group (especially the larger a group is), so your commonalities get smaller and smaller. You also have to examine the biases of the ones d…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:41 AM
2

Even during gaming gate women have played about the same amount of games as men. They just tend to be on different genres and platforms.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:36 AM
8

Should women have the responsibility of cooking? Why?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:24 AM
4

In Chile women can retire at 60 but men have to wait until 65.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:21 PM
3

I think some US states are also like that. My country is similar too. I wouldn't consider this gendered though, because although the common sexual transaction is with a female prostitute and a male john, all other combinations are possible and also happen.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:20 PM
2

My country's writing a new constitution and they're considering making a 50% reservation for women legislators. The other 50% has no limitations.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:12 PM
4

It hasn't been "men" that have cancelled birth control pills. I never got to vote. If the pill was declared unsafe under the same parameters than all other medication men have had nothing to do with it
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:34 PM
1

I don't think it's up to you to say what they feel like, but I also think that they shouldn't feel pressure to identify either way. If they feel they're "technically a man" they shouldn't feel like identifying themselves any other way.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:31 PM
1

War is organized and authorized by a tiny percentage of men, though.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:35 AM
1

War was defined as patriarchal. Which it is. Who defined this? How is it a fact that it is? Why are you ignoring people like Catherine the Great, Elizabeth of Russia, Isabella of France, Catherine de Medicci, Margareth Thatcher, or Wu Zentian, to name just a few
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:19 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:12 PM
1

Feminists have been pushing men to go to war since the 40s.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:44 PM
1

Who would sue them, and on what grounds?
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:24 PM
30

to be fair if someone goes though with a surgery like that without telling their partners they're a cunt, man or woman. I agree wholeheartedly, but it's not up to the hospital to stop people from being assholes.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:18 PM
6

To be clear: I don't think there's any public policy pushing this, it's just something that doctors do for some reason.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:17 PM
-2

Or even by time spent in the vicinity of the child. That might be an even bigger gap.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:05 PM
3

Sure, and the dad should get dibs on the full custody before the baby goes to a adoption if no parent wants to raise them.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:31 AM
10

adoption requires both parents consent. No it doesn't (when the woman is not married and then has no responsibility of naming a father)
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:29 AM
3

Well, it means everyone regardless of culture. Ethnicity is more encompassing and it also includes race or religion. You could technically have groups of people that are multicultural, but of the same religion, or race.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:44 PM
1

I see you might want to do it. If you think it's a good idea in case anything happens to your sperm, do it on your own and tell her you'll take 10 years to think about it.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:20 AM
19

You shouldn't speak against women. They're half the population so any generalization is bound to be cringy. We can criticize the position of women, or feminism, but we shouldn't fall on the "Kill all men" mentality that a lot of this sub hates.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 12:18 AM
23

What I find weird is that it calls men as a whole as a community. I think that's a fundamental feminist misunderstanding about how the world works.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 09:11 PM
1

Most of the time you can just recognize behaviors themselves as harmful or undesirable, and make rules about that. In your example about abuse, you can make both behaviors illegal when performed by anyone, regardless of stereotypes (especially since in reality a lot of abusers of birth genders will do both) There are cases where that's more difficult because of cultural norms, such as the case with nakedness, but we should make the gender differences as small as possible, especially in policing.…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 06:14 PM
21

oh... now I see that it was a gallery, lol. Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:39 AM
2

(pointless grammar rant) I know to have a low bar with the daily mail, but this sentence doesn't make any sense: Anwar died when police said the girls, armed with a taser, sped off in his car as he clung to the driver's side with the door open and crashed seconds later Did he die when the police say that?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:47 AM
-43

I feel link I'm not british enough to understand this.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:44 AM
3

Is anyone actually surprised?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:36 AM
1

You say it's only men in these roles, but the page you linked makes it seem like there's also some percentage of women. Do you have a source with actual numbers? Research also suggests that male teachers are more likely to be employed in high ranking roles within a school, such as Head of Department or Head Teacher. Studies have shown that many women in education see their role as vocational and prefer teaching to administrative or managerial roles, even though the pay grade is lower.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 09:33 PM
6

In the US it's close to 50/50, with women having a slight advantage and growing https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cls.asp
/r/MensRights02/04/21 09:28 PM
2

Yes, not all women make 6 figures writing drivel for buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 12:42 AM
18

How is this fair to male victims?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:57 PM
2

Finally, a person capable of empathy making decisions for the world.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:18 AM
1

What's the point of getting her switched on the first place? Like, why didn't that people want her next to them? Doesn't make any sense to me.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:12 AM
2

Why is society responsible for people's mental state? Everybody should be able to stay safe outside, doesn't really matter if someone is afraid for some reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:04 AM
12

Because it's a bad faith question. That claim being bullshit doesn't lead to the conclusion they're assuming.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:53 PM
10

I know it's not the point of the article, but 70/30 ground beef results in objectively better burgers. Use your lean ground beef for tartare or something.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:27 PM
6

Where are the criminal investigation for false imprisonment, kidnapping, and slander, though?
/r/MensRights26/02/21 03:14 AM
14

Except for real extreme cases, I don't think you can argue for the medical need of circumcision until early teen years (not a doctor).
/r/MensRights09/02/21 01:18 AM
6

Except the women in the waitresses dresses were not showing their chests or any other sensitive parts, just sexualized, and that apparently caused a bit of a scandal (I only have that one article to go by), were as nobody bats an eye at actual topless male servers. Even if you said that a topless man is as sexualized as a woman in a somewhat skimpy dress (which... Sure), you'd expect the same response.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 01:42 AM
10

Buried in the article there was a tiny paragraph about men in blue collar jobs “In hindsight, I almost wish I had made this a bigger part of the book,” says Birger. “This same trend makes dating hard for working-class men as well. In the US, among people aged 22-29 who do not have a college degree, there are 9.4 million single men, versus 7.1 million single women. So the dating world is just as hard for those blue collar guys. Except that hypergamy makes dating harder the less a guy earns, simil…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 12:29 PM
3

Yes, this statistic is completely useless to measure sexism without having the male counterpart, as are: In the UK, 66% of 16-18-year-old girls surveyed experienced or witnessed the use of sexist language at school 59% of women in Amsterdam reported some form of street harassment 80% of women stated that they have been confronted with the phenomenon of [being condescended to or being interrupted at work]
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:36 AM
3

It is women who say 'men should never hit a women, even if she hits him'. I've seen plenty of men say this too. My opinion is that in any self defense situation you have to try as hard as possible to remove yourself from it, but if your exit is blocked or you're being followed is when hitting back comes into picture.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:32 PM
2

This is pretty sad, I teared up reading it. I can tell you're a great dad, I really hope you don't have to go through a lot of this going forward...
/r/MensRights01/12/20 06:38 PM
12

I'm gonna take the 15 published studies as proof over word of mouth A lot of those studies don't control for level of education, experience, industry, job level, or even hours worked. Even when they do, they ignore it on their conclusions. There's an earnings gap caused by individual choices There's a wage gap, but it amounts to 5-6%, not 20%, and while some of it can be discrimination, there likely also are other factors in play.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 08:22 PM
9

Are YOU getting 20% more pay than you female coworkers? Do you know anyone that does? You do know it's illegal, right?
/r/MensRights18/11/20 08:09 PM
15

It found that women in prison overwhelmingly came from disadvantaged backgrounds and had histories of poverty, domestic violence, social deprivation and childhood trauma. Because men in prison all come from millionaire, happy, fulfilled families.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 02:22 AM
2

Even if it wasnt for equality, its a hard sell to say feminism hasn't done good for women Yeah, that's pretty much the same thing the person you replied to said.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 09:08 PM
11

It says only soldiers were allowed the vote. It doesn't sound like Poor men who couldn't fight could vote, which is where the whole "only men have conditional access to voting" thing comes from.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 09:07 PM
2

Any sex that was non consensual is rape [...] Penetration is not needed That's a weird definition of sex. I hope they mean vaginal penetration is not needed.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 10:52 PM
2

and women are only allowed to complain of sexism if it's caused by men. Even in this terrible logic they apply double standards, where feminists ignore evidence and blame men anyway, like in the case of slut shaming or fgm.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 08:12 PM
11

No, it does. There are multiple kinds of sex-related crime, they don't all have to be rape. (but forced penetration and made to penetrate absolutely have to be)
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:56 AM
15

They would probably arrest you if you didn't defend yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model
/r/MensRights17/09/20 08:40 AM
1

Successful guys in Canada will have to start getting pre-dating agreements
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:12 AM
8

On false rape and assault accusations, men can’t just be sentenced without conviction. If a woman were to do this she would need to fabricate evidence to get a prosecution and that’s illegal and difficult. https://www.innocenceproject.org/
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:41 AM
9

Reverse racism doesn't exist. It's just run of the mill racism.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 06:47 AM
11

And this is really stretching the gendering of some tasks. I mean, this is the first time I hear about women being responsible for dates.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:14 PM
0

You can absolutely refuse to pay for something (for someone else) based on your beliefs. ehhh... depends on the something, and the argument is that this is the kind of thing you should be forced to pay. You can't just not pay the bus, or not pay your employees, or take shit from stores for free, because of your religion, and the argument is that if you're an employer, the benefits of your employees should be the same regardless of your religion.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 12:33 AM
6

Yeah, I was with them until the "should". Normal men are a lot like this.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 04:31 PM
23

Supporting one specific race and or gender has never proven to be a good thing I'd agree when it's long term groups like feminism that persist past their goal, but I don't think you can reasonably argue that black people in America don't generally have the short end of the stick and need support right now. Of course the most important thing in this kind of movement is to be aware that whatever particular group you're supporting is not the only one that needs it.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 04:08 AM
5

Would you have done it as an adult it you weren't circumcised as a baby? You know you could still have had the choice, right? Unlike now.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:51 AM
2

Circumcision is cutting off a part of your body, generally not the kind of medical procedure you get for no reason, and while as an adult you could want it done and you should have the right to, babies (that can't consent) shouldn't be subjected to unnecessary procedures.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:48 AM
-12

I'm not saying burning buildings isn't violence, but if you don't think that protesting while carrying guns is not a violent act, I'm not sure what you'd say is.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:51 PM
2

No, that's "moroso"
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:35 AM
20

To be fair to the poster, though, that's the way it works in Australia. The problem is the laws, not the poster.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:37 AM
9

This is literally what the quote is about (in case someone didn't know).
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:58 PM
4

It's not like we don't call asshole men assholes. If anything, karen is a nicer word than the alternatives.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 06:48 AM
61

Another point about male centered laws is that while politicians in the US are certainly mostly male, the voting base is something like 60% women, which is what politicians really look at when making decisions (that and lobbying, of course)
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:04 PM
1

Sure, but this is lying at worst and misdirection at best. It completely ignores women state heads of countries doing terrible (Finland, Belgium), and the male heads of countries doing the best (Korea, Greenland, etc).
/r/MensRights14/04/20 02:44 PM
20

Even getting a worse paying job might be illegal... if you're a man.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:25 PM
-1

you're not making the MRM any favors by acting like a spoiled child. I don't even agree with the signs (I'm not a feminist by any means), but that's definitely what they mean (not that it makes them have any reason).
/r/MensRights01/04/20 07:39 PM
0

Yeah, that's still nowhere near your definition, I just picked the definition that I thought was closer to the sign's intention. That's the way definitions work. But you know, you can carry on thinking you know more Spanish than native speakers.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 05:32 PM
1

This is in Spain. https://dle.rae.es/?w=machismo Kind of sexism based on the prevalence of men
/r/MensRights01/04/20 04:26 PM
2

Which is why it makes sense for tampons not to be taxed. But can you buy toilet paper with pre-tax money. I do think that those things (toilet paper, tampons, toothpaste) should be treated as the same category.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:07 AM
8

there was a sermon about how it is okay to hit your wife or child as a husband. As long as it was for corrective action and out of love. THAT is toxic masculinity. No it isn't, that's just one church being fucked up. Not uncommon.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 09:11 PM
2

It depends on the context. In Chile for example it's a specific crime involving partner violence (a useless one at that. Luckily it's the same punishment on paper as killing a male partner, just with a different name)
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:04 PM
5

For me the focus is on ‘Toxic’ and the masc/femin part just describes what gender OUR SOCIETY (not I) thinks this toxicity belongs to. If this was the intent of feminism, and they are for equality, then they would be against the term, since it's a way for society to use gender roles to prejudice people. Instead, it labels behaviors and people as toxic masculinity left and right
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:18 PM
0

And in some (many?) places where abortion is illegal or semi-legal not keeping it is barely a choice Even if a woman is forced to carry to term, they still have complete control about whether they keep or give the child out for adoption, regardless of the father wanting the baby or not And don't get me started on the state forcing fatherhood on men that were tricked into thinking a child was theirs
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:53 PM
21

Horizon Zero Dawn
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:28 AM
7

This is so weird... This is the way inheritances work by default in my country.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 11:50 AM
21

And of course, being able to publish an article for millions to see is not power.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 02:21 PM
1

What would the class be?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:40 PM
1

I did say it was nitpicking. they are taught ... that seeking help is emasculating, which supported by a plethora of evidence I'm not sure that it's that clear cut, but do you care to share some of that evidence?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:54 PM
1

So, you are arguing that people are not shaped by the way they are socialized? Where are you getting this from? My second comment on this thread was about how society is failing boys because of the way we treat them. I'm saying that way people are shaped is not necessarily what you're assuming, and not all male behavior comes from a fear of being emasculated.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 03:13 PM
1

Am I, now? Are you my therapist? Seriously, though, just saying something is not the same as having proof/reasoning. On a broader scale than just myself, male disposability goes beyond mere fragility.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:28 AM
2

Not wanting to bother people unnecessarily? A bit of altruism?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:16 PM
2

they likely feel that it is some how emasculating. This is a bit nitpicky, but I feel that this is somewhat condescending. There are plenty of reasons why they wouldn't. I know I've avoided using services not because of any kind of internal reason, but due to thinking I don't need them that much and there's other people that could make better use of them, for example.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:30 PM
4

the way we socialize boys and girls that do discourage girls from enter STEM fields Only if you don't count medicine as stem. We've also socialized boys to drop out of high school and not go to college.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:02 PM
73

I don't think anyone is defending the guy, but shouldn't the charge be something more like high degree assault and battery (against the woman) rather than murder?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:34 PM
2

What? I agree that dating is different for men and women, but the issue is actually very complicated and both genders have downsides. Women might get unwanted attention, and some women get way too much. On the other hand, most men get no attention at all, and are expected to approach, where they expose themselves to be treated as creeps.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 10:04 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20130412152104/http://www1.anthro.utah.edu/PDFs/ec_evolanth.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01541424
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:16 PM
3

there's no facts in the showerthough itself, but female hypergamy is a documented phenomenon.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 09:17 AM
1

means we have (right now) a shortage of STEM educated people Only the physics-based part of STEM really.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 10:13 PM
1

In this case it's not the woman complaining about working with men, but the company avoiding having to deal with inter gender relationships, which is shafting the woman and likely demonizing the men.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:48 PM
7

Not that it matters, but victim did care. Looks like the father doesn't know his child that well after all. "The victim's voice appears to have been ignored as despite his own father claiming that his son was 'fully up for the experience' the boy himself said he had not enjoyed it and knew it was wrong. Source
/r/MensRights12/09/19 07:05 PM
8

NO ONE would do that; unless they were already F'd up to begin with Cutting a piece off a baby's foreskin is a normal and acceptable thing to do
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:23 PM
8

How would you feel if some parents wanted to remove a square inch of skin off a baby's face? Would you think it's an unnecessary procedure? If so, why is removing it from genitals suddenly ok? I don't think anyone argues against circumcision, just against unnecessary ones performed on non-consenting infants and children.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:54 PM
11

It’s not like he’s out there chopping down paper towel trees and splitting them into smaller paper towel rolls lol I mean, I get your point, but paper is literally made from trees.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:10 AM
2

0% of people with without guns have committed a shooting, though.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:05 PM
9

That already exists: it's called regular football. As far as I know, there's no rule preventing women to participate in most "men's" leagues.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:24 PM
14

Even if that proportion of women were raped (that statistic is probably an inflated one for sexual assault), most rapes happen between people who know each other. The percentage of women being assaulted by random people at night is minuscule.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:36 AM
1

It’s because we are socially expected to. And that's because potential partners are attracted to success. I wonder who those partners are...
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:30 AM
4

Yeah that's a weird range from batshit insane to reasonable, although I'm sure other people will put this stuff in different buckets as me (with me putting most of this stuff in the insane bucket). Hate that the wage gap being fake is this controversial, though. I guess lots of people really benefit from its existence.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:42 PM
7

Honestly in this case he pleaded guilty, it's still illegal, and he got the minimum sentence, I don't know how it could be handled better.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:50 PM
17

I'm pretty sure I've seen him smile in the movies though...
/r/MensRights26/02/19 09:26 AM
3

And it's not like pedophila is a crime anyway, nobody cares if someone likes kids (other than being gross), the problem is molesting them, regardless of whether you're a pedophile or your head is messed up in some other way. EDIT: And even when this woman was told to do this, she wasn't forced to.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:53 AM
1

There seems to be a huge misunderstanding. I found this in the first page of google, and nobody was calling out the level of misandry.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:51 PM
9

This is a parallel to the "men should stop men from harassing women" meme.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:53 PM
2

Switch to a safety razor. They're really nice.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:08 PM
3

Because it has no sources.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:18 PM
1

Come on man. People who kill children are psychopaths. It has nothing to do with the fucking gender. This is the exact reaction to most people here have to "teach men not to rape" campaigns. All it does is to get feminists calling people rape apologists. To complete the parody I should now call you a child-murder apologist, but I won't.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:23 AM
1

I mean, I'd say he got charged because he probably hit her. Her behavior doesn't excuse him, but she should've been charged too, and maybe the 2 of them need to be forced into relationship counseling, and their child might be better off somewhere else.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:55 PM
1

Was The Order of the White Feather in WW1 also toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:00 PM
4

I'm all for making fun of everyone. The quotes in the article, though, are not meant to be funny but to be taken seriously and some seem like calls to action.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:01 AM
9

Innocent until proven guilty does not and will hopefully never apply to social repercussions, which are what Kavanaugh is facing right now, including for job interviews. You rapped me and should be banned from this sub. What you're saying sounds pretty awful, and also a nice way to justify discrimination against ex-cons.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:04 PM
2

I wouldn't trust something as personal as web browsing to a closed piece of software. If you want to avoid firefox and chrome, you can use other open source browsers, like epiphany or rekonq.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:09 AM
15

Where's the poster telling women they have to help men when they need it?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:29 PM
1

I think it's bullshit by being overly superficial, and unlikely to fix anything, but they do say that it also applies to boys (even if it's almost an afterthought) and how it reminds then to man up. Overall, it's probably coming from a genuine place, even if misguided and useless.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:07 PM
3

The only thing that will teach the boy is how to toss women around.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:32 PM
4

If you were curious: Full article (cached) And here are the links they point to: anti-SJW/feminist/women equivocating away rape defending rapist denying systemic oppression of women Other than the link to the (not very highly upvoted) comment by /u/M_Justice that's just a bit over the top with his mention of "betas", it seems like a pretty good sensible selection of links about stuff that's wrong with feminism.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:29 PM
1

When I started reading I thought this was going to be about false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:42 PM
6

Just out of curiosity: That's the only definition of mitigate that I know, can you say what you were thinking of?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:30 PM
42

I think that the original intention wasn't to be very positive about it, but then she learned more.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:53 PM
1

It's just that the font is kind of unreadable. Thanks for providing a source!
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:35 PM
4

What's the percentage of men with stem degrees? 7% of all women doesn't​ seem that low...
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:43 PM
22

You need to learn what statistical significance means. (hint: it has nothing to do with the likelyhood of the result by themselves)
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:25 AM
3

Not if the mother decides to give the child up for adoption (depending on the state)
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:10 PM
0

standardized math No such thing. Also, look at this map. Pretty much only commonwealth countries use the period as decimal separator.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:49 AM
4

We're the different country. We're literally the only quirk. Not really. Most of the commonwealth uses periods as the decimal separator, as seen in this map. No programming language, which you seem to be familiar with none of, based on your comment, accepts grouped notation as a standard Python uses _ as thousands separator
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:47 AM
9

Not a lot. There are negligible STD prevention effects, but in both cases you should wear a condom anyway and then it evens out.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:26 PM
8

Because babies can't consent to cosmetic mutilation? I don't think anybody cares what an adult does to their body.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:13 PM
4

after 5 the brain is "fully developed" Not really relevant, but studies have shown that smoking marijuana before 18 does affect your brain, so I don't know if I'd call a 5 year old's brain fully developed.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:06 PM
18

Sure, it's a biological inconvenience and I think you hit the mark, but what about women being able to give a child in adoption without even telling the father about it? What about women forcing a man support a child they don't want? And what about women tricking men into supporting or even rising children that aren't theirs?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:28 AM
4

The feminist claim is that historically, medical research has been mostly done on male subjects, which means that not all old research will be valid for them and they do have a point. The men's right claim is that currently medical research and practice focuses mostly on women's health. For example breast cancer is by far the best funded cancer, over deadlier and more commons forms.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:52 AM
4

Just out of curiosity (don't know anything about india), is the problem present in planes too?
/r/MensRights17/01/17 02:13 AM
5

if we make it not illegal, as many here want, then no, you can't sue. Wat. I've literally never read that opinion here (but I don't read downvoted posts)
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:49 PM
25

I think a lot of it is projection, since a lot of women seem unable to put themselves in the shoes of a man and have empathy for them, so they just assume that the reverse is true.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 03:37 PM
4

And your solution for not letting men to die is... kill men that haven't killed? I don't think people are saying he's innocent of everything, just that death row might be an overreaction.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 06:34 PM
9

She agreed to the searches though, you have the right to not incriminate yourself and personal privacy but she gave that out willingly, so (without knowing the actual laws regarding this) I don't see how it would be illegally obtained evidence.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:44 PM
3

The earth is not flat. Not really, it has been accepted that the earth is round for thousands of years. Greek astronomers/mathematicians actually calculated the diameter pretty closely.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 08:07 AM
2

I like how the the article claims to know the real problems men face and that are ignored by the mrm, when those are some of the central problems the mrm worries about and also they laughed about half of them like a paragraph before.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:59 AM
13

Why is violence against women more important?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:52 AM
14

Men have (almost?) never had an inherent right to vote in the US.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:54 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqjcHYTQgQ
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:50 AM
13

Where abortion should be a choice JUST like circumcision. No, circumcision shouldn't be a choice for parents to make.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 12:53 AM
1

Yes. Even their website says they're the men's tennis association.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:25 AM
0

Oh, I meant as a form of dv, and it's not just offending something, but stuff such as controlling what your partner does with the threat if violence or other means, not just an insult.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:09 AM
-2

Well, it's closer to hate speech, and of course you need proof like anything else.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:07 AM
-2

It varies between countries of course. Where I'm from, psychological violence (that's the way it's written in the law) is illegal.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:12 AM
38

Not even, we have the police for that. If you're a victim of abuse, whether it's physical or emotional you should go to them (although if you're a man you might not want to because they might assume that you're the abuser), the only reason there is for killing someone would be if you were in imminent danger, and you were stopping them from harming you.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:44 AM
1

I know where you're coming from, but it's more like the actual number is closedr to 3 billion.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:01 PM
1

Pit against a Sith Lord Who said Kylo was a Sith Lord?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:26 AM
16

most of the batshit-crazy Feminazi sites are actually run by the radicalized MRAs Jezebel is run by MRAs?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:20 AM
6

Also would like to point out that half the world does draft women into the military No they don't, please stop spreading misinformation. Also, I don't know how being raped leads to death, I think you're confusing corelation with causation a bit there.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:56 AM
2

Or just because of crime, really.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:53 AM
1

As if it existimg wouldn't make you want to see it... that trailer was amazing.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:01 AM
2

It's different to talk about less fortunate people having problems, than complaining about how you made only 5 millions for working less hours than the rest.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:46 PM
0

Men do the same, everyone tries to get advantage of whatever they can, including their bodies.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:02 PM
40

Could be, women have more incentives to do it though, so it may not be the case.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:02 PM
3

Super Saiyan transformations aren't free though, you need to train and sometimes be under pressure in order to unlock them.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 01:50 AM
1

Yeah, but you're not judging fitness just because, just whether they're fit enough for the job. IMHO if the stats of the oldest woman in that table is enough (and looking at them, they shouldn't be) then everybody should be tested on that standard.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:13 PM
1

So the alternative to having people that can actually make an arrest are dangerous, less lethal weapons?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:09 PM
1

You're right, it does have that focus and problems, but I was thinking more in terms of 'could' than 'should'. Reddit started pretty different than what it is now (I mean, /r/programming is not a default and is a lot less active).
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:56 PM
4

Hacker News? Reddit's front page used to be pretty close to it back when there where like 5 fixed subreddits (I wasn't around when subreddits didn't exist)
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:30 PM
3

Jail, man. Not a pretty place.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:48 PM
0

Yeah, but the only thing about parenthood that are forced and defended by the state for men is the financial obligations, sadly. So for the people that don't want to have a hand in raising a child, the only legal hurdle is child support. Of course, this should be treated like an abortion, you shouldn't be able to abandon your born children.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:59 PM
2

Not in the past though, Athlon 64s wiped the floor with anything Intel pumped out.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:18 PM
1

Feminism DOESN'T work for men's rights, and they actively undermine them
/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:49 PM
1

But one of the main problems of feminism, is people that simply don the label without understanding textbook / institucional feminism, therefore unknowingly supporting female supremacists.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:39 PM
1

And a lot of times it isn't, so you cannot really call it a movement for equality, it just aligns with it some (increasingly rare) times.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:28 PM
2

This is what that privilege looks like
/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:06 AM
4

This sub is an echo chamber
/r/MensRights19/11/14 10:35 AM
1

Yes, but traditionalism isn't the dominant social discourse of the western world.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:12 AM
1

But if you're blacked out and have sex, wouldn't you be a rape victim?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:08 AM
4

It depends on who you ask. You posted wikipedia. Is that "feminists" now? Wikipedia has a pretty feminist bias, actually.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:14 AM
2

Yep, I've read that it's harder for Asians to get into college in the US because they're hindered on the basis that they're overepresented. (on a similar note, most universities lump Jews with European whites, letting them get way overepresented, highlighting that the system in place doesn't even work for what it was meant to do) My country uses only standardized tests, but still people from public schools get bonus points, which to me is just another way of producing false statistics about the …
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:18 PM
7

But most men haven't ever raped anyone, why would you do something as pointless as assign the blame of a crime to a gender (how do you feel by assigning to a race? ) , especially when that assumption can help some rapists to get lower sentences.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:32 AM
3

1 Yeah, guys have nothing to worry about, most violence being directed at men and all that. 4 balls 7 seriously? guys coming out of their house with a piece of paper stuck to their face doesn't ring a bell? also, balls 10 Everyone has to keep a professional behaviour.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 02:22 AM
2

Oh, you didn't ruffle any feathers, no problem. I just think it's important to recognize that there can be discrimination between individuals.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:23 AM
2

Being sexist is just engaging in Sexism. I think a better term for what you're doing is institutionalized sexism, and it's a pretty important distinction IMHO, as sexism can definitely happen between individuals.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:21 AM
3

Yes it is, sexisim is discrimination (aka diferenciation) based on gender.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:48 PM
1

That's such a tenuous argument. You might as well argue that by producing big TV sets people are contributing to crime by making people want to buy them which makes some people turn to crime to get more money. It isn't an equivalence, the analogue is that buying a TV makes companies want to make TVs, which is what actually happens.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:37 AM
2

Biggest punishment: for child pornography -- a crime she didn't commit at all really. She isn't a pedophile, she didn't sexually assault a child, nor was she ever likely to. The whole idea that looking at porn is a crime is fucked up anyway. This is the "crime" of the moral panic that is being used by feminists to attack men for the most part. It's a victimless non-crime that she only pretended someone else was committing. Looking at child porn definitely falls outside victimless crime, it encou…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:36 AM
19

She's only the US Secretary of State, of course she has no power over any men, so she doesn't have the power to be sexist. I'd wish feminists would stop for a moment and think about power before spouting their bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:19 PM
2

Oh, I see, totally makes sense, just ignore me. EDIT: this sounded kind of sarcastic, it isn't
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:30 PM
2

I'm an overweight fuck and am coming back from a 14 km trek half through snow, with a bunch of shit on my backpack (wouldn't say 65 lb though, probably like 15kg). Those are some seriously low standards for a soldier.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 12:13 PM
8

Except that for that you'd need a lot of censorship in the sub, and other (possibly more aggressive or enthusiastic ) people wouldn't be able to share their thoughts. Adults are supposed to have skin thick enough to handle a few unsavory comments from strangers. (and should also have the tact to avoid doing such comments, of course, but Internet culture is that way)
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:18 AM
1

I wouldn't say that's the gist of it, she's a rapist that wasn't punished, so it's not unlikely she'll continue, and she's a woman so it's likely her crimes will be forgiven /overlooked (especially since made - to - penetrate rape isn't typified as such in a bunch of places)
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:01 PM
2

Is this implying that strong people are rapists? It sure seems like it.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:52 PM
2

Isn't the point of a neckbeard that it be not groomed?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:27 AM
11

Not really that surprising, Wikipedia's article on feminist theory says that that is a fundamental piece of feminist theory. Probably a lot of logic crumbles down without that assumption.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 04:35 PM
-1

Stop womansplaining!! /s What you're getting at is a problem, but I wasn't talking about starring. Just try to imagine the minigun scene from John Rambo with only women at the wrong end of the gun, there would still be a shit storm about how mysgonistic it is, but since they were guys nobody cares. Now, I'm not saying I would do anything about this, I value artistic liberty over avoiding offending people (this also goes to that video on media and women) , so I don't really care that much, but op…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:43 AM
1

Grab any action movie, notice how men dying in the background are treated.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:57 AM
31

There are some repeated items in the list, and some are not explained or not really worded as a priviledge, and I think that kind of thing really weakens the message I marked some here, but there are probably a few more. I'd also like sources on some of these claims (well, ideally I'd like source on all of them, but a lot are obvious or widely known, at least here)
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:45 AM
14

Wouldn't that be hysteric?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:46 PM
2

It's also a specific kind of shot in a movie where the camera gets a first person (over the shoulder and similar also work) perspective of a man checking out a woman. It's not something that happens on the street, or anywhere without a camera, really.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:22 PM
0

I think it is adequate to think that in the context of the creation of feminism/the women's rights movement it was working as an agent of equality by empowering women, abd definitely not the other way around.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:58 AM
2

That quote from Hitler seems to be against classic "gender doen't matter" feminism, that a lot of peple here at least partially agree with.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:29 PM
8

What is that supposed to mean anyway? Feminist positive... Something?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:56 PM
1

I'm no expert in physics history, but I think I remember current and static electricity were separate discoveries, and in static electricity, it was said that the charge in a piece of glass after being rubbed with silk was positive.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:55 AM
2

Because it was discovered before we knew more about the atom and it turns out we thought the wrong part was moving. And it's not that big of a deal.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:22 AM
19

someone in this sub Not saying it couldn't be, but how do you know, this is far from the only place where feminists aren't liked much, if anything this sub is on the tame end of the scale.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:11 PM
2

That's a really really weird question... Woman passed out sleeping on a couch would-be-rapist: "dayum that's hot, let me get my d20, I hope it's more than 5"
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:24 AM
4

imho no subject is inappropriate for a joke, it's why they're jokes.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:49 PM
1

It's weird, I've read a lot about men finding phablets less handy than women because women usually carry purses anyway, while we have to rely on our pockets.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:36 AM
4

Now there isn't, but along history there have been a lot things holding back women, so it's really unfair to say "all great inventions were made by men" when women weren't allowed near the stuff. Luckily this isn't true anymore.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:39 PM
2

I don't think it's up to us to offer explanations for gender roles. Feminists tried and look where they are. That way lies madness. We can achieve overall change by trying to change things case by case and having people take it as an example (a bottom-up approach). Trying to study would lead to generalizing, which imho causes a lot of what's wrong to feminism. We shouldn't want to become a dogma.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:54 AM
3

I didn't really put any anecdotes, but was talking about a general predisposition (you should have asked me to clarify my admittedly vague statements instead of saying they're anecdotes, and then I'd have had to do some google searches). You're obviously being contrary instead of trying to truly understand.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:57 PM
0

why do people on here always criticise Feminism for not beings egalitarian enough Because they claim to be and have repeatedly said "feminism care about women too" and "the patriarchy hurt men too", when it's clear by their actions and some other quotes that they really don't care about men.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:44 PM
6

if we're going to examine all laws in all countries, you're about to find out women are treated a lot worse than men in most places Yes, and there's plenty of people and organizations that care about that, and they should, just as we should care about men issues and the disadvantages we face, it's not a contest.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:42 PM
3

Yeah... there's not a lot of contexts where you'd use that.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:50 AM
14

You also get points for looking intimidating, which is not something that's usually desirable for women.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:35 AM
27

It's probably possible to do it, we're not here to negate that women have it bad, but to point out we do too. Anyways, this is certainly not nitpicking, these statistics show pretty big differences (unlike, say, gender pay disparity).
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:32 AM
1

This is a great idea, I'll check if I have any of those adsense credit vouchers laying around
/r/MensRights21/10/13 03:19 AM
2

The conditions girls are in seem awful for learning
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:36 PM
8

This is probably related to a self-fulfilling prophecy. The original piece was making fun of roughly the same kind of thinking that leads people to post it in a non-ironic way.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:06 AM
17

It's a shame what's happened to him, and it's good to get the word out, but that video is just bad, with the overly dramatic doctor who music and the whole "we demand stuff... he won't give up" and identifying themselves as "the men's right movement" as if it was the entirety of the movement that made that video.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:20 PM
16

It's a scientific fact by now that being better looking people can influence others more easily, effectively being power. Why isn't being pretty/handsome a power fantasy?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:12 AM
3

are egalitarian, don't completely agree with feminism, are interested in discussing men's issues that seems like most people I've encountered in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:29 AM
7

Yes, but that's not what he said. After all, a lot of feminist theory seems to simply reapply Marx with capitalists and proletareate changed for male and female. Not saying the analisys is sound (it actually breaks pretty quickly when you pick up on all the men that are disadvantaged).
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:27 AM
2

What about 'forced to penetrate' rape?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:38 AM
3

I really hate that kind of schoolarship, imho they should just account for house income vs family members and Scores, the rest is fluff. Of course, you can't remove the ability of groups to gift money to whoever they like, but it doesn't stop being discriminatory and less than efficient.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 08:38 PM
0

The concepts of "power minority" and "power majority" were invented to make the phrase make sense. I think it's a pretty dishonest language manipulationm but 'oppression is done by the people with power' is too obvious to be catchy.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:27 PM
3

It doesn't mean the advise is right either. AFAIK there isn't proof that rapists go for women more scantly dressed for example.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:42 PM
4

This hasn't been my experience honestly (your comment criticizing the front page sits at a comfortable 5 points), but it sucks that you've had that experience, extremists suck.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:21 PM
4

Even if it has generated some meaningful debate in the thread, I don't think this is really relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:27 PM
3

I wouldn't go that far, there are pointless posts, but there's also lots of mr/mrm relevant posts.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:18 PM
0

Discrimination = Power + Prejudice was an excuse to allow black people enact prejudice against white people and it's used the same way by feminists. It breaks down immediately when you examine personal power and agency, so the very premise of the argument is broken, but good luck trying to convince feminists, many of whom have dedicated their careers to the theory, to realize it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:23 PM
0

why not define "rape" as "the action performed by a rapist?" There are some words defined this way in dictionaries.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:07 PM
8

I did overreact, I'll admit, that statistic really irks me and you can get lost in the echo chamber (I often find myself criticizing this subreddit for this same kind of thing), BUT there is such thing as subtext, and when the statistic used to report something excludes a set of occurrences it's easy (although honestly not necessarily correct) to interpret it as an attempt at manipulation. After all there are lies, damned lies and statistics. EDIT: The reason I said RAINN was because I was going…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:53 AM
8

RAINN does it.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:36 AM
47

There's still a lot of resistance on 'women can be rapists', most feminists recognize men can be raped, but a lot deny women can rape.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:57 AM
1

chauvinism is a brader term though, it's not married to gender issues.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:03 AM
3

OMG YOU ABLEIST!!
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:09 AM
3

oh! look at that asshole who cares about feeding his family.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:49 PM
12

And you let the part where it's a men's locker room out of the matter. It cannot be left out. I find ridiculous that any reporters are allowed into a locker room where people change, there's bound to be some degree of awkwardness. There's guys who walk naked though the middle of a locker room pretty much everywhere, she's complaining about a normal behavior, if she doesn't want to see it, she's welcome to ask someone to replace her in her duties.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:12 PM
1

imagine what this Batman looks like when he’s incredibly happy and excited. Imagine him in love This shows a remarkable lack of research, there's no need of imagination, there's plenty of evidence of batman being in love, of course he still isn't usually "happy", and his relationships don't often end well.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:45 AM
1

The weirdest thing I find about this is that I've never ever have heard of society setting standards for vaginas... I've seen judgements about tits, height, hair, ass, legs, waist, abs, stomach, penises, most facial features and a lot of other things, but vaginas are pretty low-ranked on the 'stereotyped body features' list. Edit: Just in case, I'm not saying some effort in this issue is pointless, but having it on the cover is definitely blown out of proportion.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:53 PM
2

It's mainly because Feminist researchers embrace two key tenets: (1) their research should focus on the condition of women in society, and (2) their research must be grounded in the assumption that women generally experience subordination. But yes, I too get annoyed at the victim complexes in this sub sometimes (mostly with jokes and ads). This is a real issue though, as statistics show that there's something wrong with education for boys, and this kind of stuff might be one of the causes.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:19 PM
1

The problem is the dismisal (and this is true for a lot of MR issues). You'll see a lot of internet and academia feminists saying men don't have the same kind of image issue as women. Almost nobody in this thread has said that holding all women to the standard of models isn't an issue. EDIT: was saying the opposite of what I wanted.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:24 AM
6

Yep, tendencies in expression can really bias this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:14 AM
9

In non-gaming related stuff, he also founded Armadillo Aerospace, and when he requested root access for his Tesla Roadster it was given to him.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:21 AM
2

It depends on what you're thinking they're influencing, while a critic has some influence on the genre, it's not close to what an actual work in the genre has on it, as long as it has some innovation. They can definitely have a greater influence on the public, however.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:18 AM
1

yeah they would, and it would still be hugely disproportional.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:18 AM
10

The thing is that while a lot of it is probably societal, there's bound to be some hardwiring going on, it's no accident that a lot of men find a big ass attractive, since it's usually correlated with wide hips, and breast are related to breastfeeding so there's that too, and big muscles don't work too well accentuating either. Now, I played a woman especialized in swords (I'm a guy) in fable II and found it neat how it was more accurate and wouldn't push to make the character more feminine, if …
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:45 AM
-2

what's that H? I've never seen it.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:42 PM
15

This isn't complaining about women but feminists and women's studies. They are most definitely not the same and it's a pretty important distinction.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:55 PM
40

While this is great to improve equality right now, I'd like it better if we did away with this genderer bull shit and turn all scholarships for single fathers and mothers into scholarships for single parents.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:20 AM
3

some subreddits (definitely not this one) can use css tricks to make avatars. /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu and /r/anime have them, for example
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:58 PM
3

I know there aren't rules against downvote brigades, but please don't go and have a downvote-fest on opinions you disagree with because a) it's not what downvotes are for and b) this subreddit will gain the reputation of a downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:33 AM
13

You mean kind of like the current systems. Sure there is some office politics at hand too, but a lot of people are paid based on merit.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:50 PM
2

I mean, I totally agree with you, but I was thinking more in terms of "justificable in law".
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:01 PM
1

Yeah, I think shoving them with as much force as necessary (I don't think you could defend hitting them) would be reasonable methinks.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:49 PM
1

About 2%, which is a low percentage, but still a shitton of computers.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:37 AM
1

uh? you know reddit runs on linux, right? and google, amazon, ebay, like 490 of the world's 500 fastest super computers and so on, right? Also, the interface is in korean but it's the same ol' gnu/linux underneath, it's only as hackable as any other linux system (so, it's up to the admin really).
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:24 PM
3

Dude, both are pretty fucked up, but please just sit for a moment and determine who the victims for these crimes are. Also, I have a bit of trouble with this pedophilia is about as low as you can go... I can think of a lot of worse stuff, but maybe I just have a more active imagination. Also, I'm pretty sure attraction for a 13 years old would fall under hebephilia.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:15 AM
1

thinking about it I'd say it's more settings than periods. I dunno, ancient rome, feudal japan, the holy roman empire, a bunch of muslim countries in recent history, stuff like that. But I'm not an historian to really pinpoint closer than that.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:03 PM
1

aren't you supposed to use and pay them (that part is important, don't use them if you can't pay them) to build a credit record?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:35 PM
3

I totally agree with you, but I think this a thousand times more than men ever had. is a bit too much of an exageration. Comparable? sure but historically there's been periods of a lot of real "male priviledge" as they call it. Obviously not anymore. <sup>EDIT: how do I grammar?</sup>
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:27 PM
0

You mean old school feminists that put white feathers on men that weren't fighting the war to guilt them and shame them into enlisting (or even re enlisting)?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:54 PM
2

ah!... true. we don't really have that distinction in spanish.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:38 PM
3

Being disabled is something you deal with for life. Not really... if you break your femur or something like that (note: not a doctor) you'll be disabled for a couple of years.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:26 PM
-1

While true there doesn't seem to be any actual discrimination. Maybe most women are put off by the scene in low-level play (you know, all that people that start flaming when their cannon rush/6pool/11-11 fails) so they stop playing and don't get better. Hell, scarlett, a pro starcraft player is a trans female. There was a bit of confusion the first time she appeared but most people just talk about her play (although some people may be a bit more forgiving with her sometimes.)
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:19 PM
1

Maybe they should have put a couple of booth babes up on the stage and call it a day. There, women. Seriously though, it can't be helped if the people on the positions they chose to go upstage are men. EDIT: typos
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:08 PM
2

We talk shit about feminists all the time. The things they listed were against women.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:49 PM
23

Yeah, women totally feel represed whenever you use your godly male priviledge powers to create new life or inventing existence.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:35 PM
1

If you hate antialiasing please use png (also, if it's not a photo please use png), those jpeg artifacts are rather noticeable. Still, pretty good concept methinks.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:58 PM
18

If most feminists aren't like this and don't don't like to be straw-manned, why don't you denounce and oppose this kind of thinking en masse?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:05 AM
4

I do too, and about half of women don't thank me, or acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:38 PM
11

Nah man, this is also "The Patriarchy's Fault ©"
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:46 AM
-3

I don't think that actually happens too often. I think it's more likely that a rapist rapes someone, and then rape apologists go and blame the woman.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:16 AM
7

Excuse me, how is this women bashing? And are you seriously saying dead people have it better than mugged people?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:30 AM
1

sociology literally means "the study of society", with its embeded culture. The fact that there are feminist sociologists doesn't mean they aren't sociologists to start with. I just don't see your point. Whenever someone studies culture they're practising ad hoc sociology. My point is that the goal of feminism isn't to study culture, but rather it's a way to do it, among other things. You don't need feminism to study culture.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:11 PM
1

I'm guessing most intentional date rapists (ie not we were both piss drunk so we hit it off and don't really remember) think what they're doing is ok either.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:29 PM
3

Feminism doesn't examine culture, sociology/anthropology does. Feminism is just an opinion/current in several fields.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:25 PM
13

it IS a shit movie, and I guess you're >implying that it somehow empowers women? when the main character pretty much thinks nothing?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:05 AM
2

I love the trigger warning at the bottom...
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:41 AM
1

The idea is to get people to ask you why you are growing a moustache. If people ask that question to hairy people (I get it quite often when I'm lazy and go a couple of weeks without shaving), I guess they will feel more inclined to the usually hairless guy with a patch of fuzz over their lip.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:45 AM
1

nope, at least you're not banned now.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:49 AM
4

I think this is slightly more evil than PUA. Both are manipulative bullshit, but PUA's 'game' is simply getting laid, sure it's objectifying and using people, but at least it's over after the fact. If a man accepts this bullshit he'll be fucked for quite a bit of time more.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:18 AM
1

I think it's more up to SRD's alley.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:26 PM
0

urinals.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:49 PM
2

not classic. I think the systematic bit was added in either feminist or postmodernist (not sure which, my area of expertise would't fall within the purview of your conundrums of philosophy).
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:18 PM
1

she's been told to do what every other sole provider of a household does: bear with it and provide.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:37 AM
3

I was talking about the term, I know why the subreddit was banned.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:11 AM
2

I can't believe I'm kind of defending /r/jailbait or /r/creepy...whatever, I forgot the name, but jailbait isn't a term for CP, it's kind of related, but isn't porn, and the unwanted photos of women were in public space and as creepy as they are, people don't have a right not to be photographed in public, it would be ridiculous if you couldn't take a picture because there's random people in it. (upskirts and the like are most likely illegal since they violate reasonable personal space and should…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:04 AM
49

You shouldn't be ashamed of being female just because some of them are evil and manipulative.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:45 PM
5

As a matter of fact, yes we do as a group.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:31 AM
1

opposed to both political and economic hierarchy. I'm not really well versed in this matters (my profession doesn't really get within the purview of the conundrums of philosophy), but is seems to me that even with socialized ownership you'd end up with some sort of organization, and therefore implied hierarchy.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:37 AM
1

The problem is, if you follow that strict line of logic you are not going to allow children who have been molested a chance to get that person charged. Wasn't people supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. I know for sure I'd rather have a guilty man for free than have an innocent one charged.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:22 AM
5

I can't really say she's guilty. Now I'm not saying that if she had done something else then she would still have gotten raped, so she could've probably prevent it, but I feel that everyone should be able to pass out somewhere and wake up without being assaulted. I mean, sure, if I got my cellphone stolen while I was passed out I could have prevented it, but I sure as hell can complain about the mofo that couldn't keep his hands out of my pocket. Not the same at all. I'm not a feminist, I just d…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:45 PM
6

This is no different that women complaining about rape while wearing a bikini yes it is. One is a nuisance (I'm guessing it's on the same level as IT guys and people wanting them to fix their shit) and the other is pretty big stuff.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:33 PM
-1

I think the kids shouting "niggerfaggot bitch" are retarded, but being offended at it is as, if not even more, stupid. Damn jimmies being rustled left and right.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:06 PM
4

I don't think so, It's probably a DMCA takedown. My google-fu is failing me, but here's an article: http://targetlaw.com/consequences-of-filing-a-false-dmca-takedown-request
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:18 PM
1

"My family actually came to the states from south africa, so I'm african american"
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:24 PM
1

I think you're overestimating the strength of cock. If you're hitting with enough force to break a pelvis I don't thing a bit of spongy tisue would help.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:14 PM
38

Oddly that's usually the official definition. I have always asumed it was forced sex.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:04 PM
2

I didn't really mean to get the top spot, just wanted to find some men's right relevance to the history, since it really has nothing to do with gender (a girl with the same problems would have probably ended up having the same reactions from teachers, police, councelors, &c).
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:11 PM
2

kid was about 16-ish, following, beating, and blocking the guy's exit, guy was i dunno, maybe 30, after backing up and getting cut off he landed 2 hits and the kid got knocked up. while the brat was beating on the guy, her friends filming were laughing their asses off. EDIT: Yeah, no he wasn't about 30, I was sleepy when I watched the video. at least 55.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:01 AM
2

abortion is a greater crime than rape. I don't think abortions are a good thing to do, personally (but would never impede a woman from doing it), but that sentence depends on whether or not you consider the fetus to be a person/human/living (for different grades of crime).
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:29 AM
1

then maybe n ≟ p+q to indicate they're independent?
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:25 AM
8

You mean you won't rape them? ...odd
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:46 AM
28

Since this is /r/MensRights, I found this quote pretty relevant: They are all trained to take all accusations of child abuse seriously, and as a part of that they blindly took the kid’s side for everything, and dismissed us as “the lying abusers”. Is very similar to the response of authorities in rape cases, and is what propels fake rape accusations.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:07 AM
2

The kid would be the woman's responsability. Regular poor people that don't have money to raise a lot of children but have them anyways do not recieve child support.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:57 PM
6

I hear that part of it is actual rape, and part of it is because of their kind of wide definition of rape. EDIT: found better wording
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:10 PM
1

What about krav maga practioning women?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:26 PM
-6

You're right, I'll have to downvote you for mentioning Sharon Osborne though :(
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:45 AM
1

Yep, all articles I've found suggest similar numbers. Never seen a pay deviation though, to check if it's significative.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 06:19 PM
3

Final Fight's Poison (visually a typical video game female) was declared a tranny so you wouldn't be beating women. shit's weird.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:17 AM
1

then don't walk into a female bathrooms, seriously. Just read some AMA from any janitor that has ever done that. I'd wish I could unread some of that shit... and tampons, and blood.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:56 PM
1

a art?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:54 PM
1

I don't really think that when fazed with a huge queue when almost-pissing-themselves, most drunk-as-fuck men wouldn't just walk along a wall and piss there.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:52 PM
2

I thought it was going to be this
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:33 PM
3

You need to have an extremely flamboyant name to qualify as Lamborghini chief test driver though... no idea about non-chief positions.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:17 AM
2

Well, given the definition of "system that priviledges men over other genders" is kind of true. The problem is that's a completely useless and stupid definition of the word. It's kind of saying "Racism is a system that priviledges white people over other races", then you have no word for japanese people discriminating koreans or stuff like that.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:12 PM
7

the problem is when they're both drunk, which as far as I know isn't a terribly uncommon thing to happen after a party.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 07:16 PM
3

I like how when there are more men in jail it's because they commit more crime, but don't you dare say women as a whole earn less because they tend to choose jobs that pay less (and don't forget only one of those is prove to be true)
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:00 PM
6

I hate to do this, but that can by solved with surgery, you try to be taller.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:27 AM
12

It's actually entirely possible that he both liked it (most likely on a physical level, but what do I know) and was bad for him. Still not funny at all.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:02 AM
-1

I think it's just a matter of context, you wouldn't focus the talk of a MR group on descrimination against women or discrimination against transgenders (for being transgender, if someone were discrimined for being perceived as a man, then bring it on), but that doesn't mean that most of the individuals aren't against those either, and in fact, I feel most people here are against all gender-based discrimination, we just focus, while posting here, on men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:31 AM
6

why not the other way around though? do hold a door for a man if you would for a woman :)
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:52 AM
1

There is definitely irony in that story Nope, there's not irony here, ironic means "is Poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended". Mugging a thief would be ironic probably, this is just fucked up.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:39 AM
2

Wait, you have an issue with saying penis and vagina? that's... inusual. Also... do you normally refer to people by their genitalia?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:14 PM
2

the fuck is a P or a V? Also, I don't know this Gosling fellow, but he probably wouldn't have complained about an article saying he was saved by a woman (btw he probably would've been labeled as sexist or insecure if he had) so we wouldn't be having the same article.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:09 PM
4

She kind of was a woman who was in danger though... any other portrayal would be a lie.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:08 PM
5

What about female priviledge? If we asume that males are the most "priviledged" gender, it doesn't mean women don't have priviledge. From the top of my head Can be around children without people thinking I'm a pedophile Can chose not to have children if a pregnancy happens after sex Can be confident of getting the children in the case of divorse Gets less severe punishment than men do for the same crimes in the justice system Isn't expected to make the first move to star a relationship Most like…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:05 AM
1

there is no scientifically rigorous experiment we can do that would give us "the answer" to government. An experiment could probably be designed, but it would definitely be a pretty bloody affair.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 04:47 AM
7

but more funding would lead to better teachers though.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:04 AM
8

would you pass out or throw up on them? (btw I'd totally support you throwing up on them)
/r/MensRights27/03/12 04:58 AM
2

Dunno what why you started laughing, OkCupid does some pretty interesting data mining on their blog. I do not care much for online dating, but their blog explores some pretty interesting knowledge.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:47 AM
-4

I seriously don't understand this, it's not that I simply disagree, it's just dobleplus much doublespeak for me to handle. To have a free society you need the government to control people's bodies, and reproductive and health choices?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:51 AM
8

this can't be regarded as women's oppression agains men. I don't think a lot of us care about who is doing the oppresing as long as it stops (I'm speaking from a general point of view of course, as in we, humans)
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:23 PM
11

Contact info at http://who.godaddy.com/whois.aspx?domain=howtogetpregnant.net&prog_id=GoDaddy
/r/MensRights19/02/12 12:10 AM
1

well... it would be an even greater ratio if you started counting from the same date, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:37 AM
1

I'm not a native speaker and also I'm a engineery student, so I don't get some sociolgy or political speak. What would "disproportionate burden of care" mean?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:19 PM
128

"Boys become doormats"
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:23 PM
1

I was talking out of memory, here's a wikipedia page about it. Apparently it's even possible just to kill the prey out of exaustion.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:51 PM
-1

ok... club it to death.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:44 PM
1

not exactly pre-tool, but almost http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_hunting#Persistence_hunting_in_human_evolution
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:41 PM
-1

I don't really think so. Hunting in prehistoric times consisted of trying to kill an animal and then chase it to exaustion (apparently humans have a lot more stamina than faster animals) and then kill it... with tools. If women took care of children (which I think is a fairly good asumption, given the evidence), then they would be left a LONG distance away from them. EDIT: I said pre-tool out of memory and it seems to be a sensible topic so I changed it.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:44 PM
1

oh, alright then, it's just that I've heard the argument that women choices are biased due to their uprising and therefore they are forced to take the jobs they take (I don't really buy it much). Just checking for consistency.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 02:05 AM
1

so you don't think males doing more dangerous jobs is sexist, ok, I'm interested on what you think of the fact that women work lower paying works (like in the service industry, instead of stuff like computer science).
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:37 AM
1

-16. I have a longer life expectancy. True, but again an abuse of statistics. 105 males are born for every 100 females, which accounts for most of the difference in life expectancy. That's not how statistics work. the difference in birth rate doesn't explain the difference in life expentancy at all (also, there's a noticiable difference even when accounting for child mortality, if that's what you were talking about) -47. When it comes to sex, I'm not required to maintain an erection for a long t…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:34 PM
2

yeah, I'm not a suscriber od /r/malefashionadvise or whatever, but from what I've read when it bleeds through is that you should tailor you shit.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:01 AM
2

I think that the disclaimer at the bottom of the post is an indicative of this.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:27 PM
1

yes it has, more than once (although obviously not very frequently).
/r/MensRights10/10/11 03:03 AM
5

yep, while I haven't been lectured by a crazy woman, I have received the look of hate from women passing through a door I'm holding. blokes usually thank.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:21 PM
3

I don't think men are expecting what they don't deserve, they are probably fine with lower grades. I personally go around trying to get barely-passing grades, since that means I can allocate the rest of my time to stuff that interests me, and that usually include some courses.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:54 AM
1

having them wear safety equipment Oh no, not in my football, not besides a shin guard anyways.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 06:04 AM
7

I think there shouldn't be "women studies" classes, but gender studies ones, but of course, feminists would find some way to say that is sexist.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 09:31 PM
1

Some men prefer small breasts and no one complains that he wants to give all women breast reductions. because no one has been so stupid to try to.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 06:49 AM
1

I'm sick of this shit, If a buy a fast car, it's because I want to go fast, dammit.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 06:37 AM
1

I'm not in favor of child abuse, obviously, but I don't think a smack is so terrible (or even unnecesary) to be actually called child abuse. Of course, I'm not a parent, so I wouldn't know.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 07:39 AM
7

Which is why nowdays we see scholarships and hiring preferences for male mental workers, as well as various outreach programs and... oh wait, we don't. Only fields like computer science do that, to women.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 11:15 PM
2

Actually, they more than likely don't get paid the same, it's even possible that the small guy is paid more for no reason, and then we will have high people rights groups. (btw, I'm a short guy... not actually hating on short guys, but incompetent people that get paid the same as competent ones).
/r/MensRights24/04/11 03:27 AM
9

FTA: Even if men and women had the same incomes, women would have less wealth [...] women are more likely to be single parents well, no shit sherlock, that's what happens when you deny almost every option for fathers to get custody.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:17 AM
11

no it's not, gender isn't fluid, you can't be a woman a day and man another, I buy that sexuality or gender roles can be social and fluid, but not gender really.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:14 AM
2

It is the day at which "an average woman" would have made as much as "an average man" in the previous year. that's retarded. Thanks to inflation, that average woman would still be gaining less than the average man.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:11 AM
12

lolwat Shine: It makes sense that women are hard-wired for endurance, considering another chapter in the book entitled, “Women Live Longer.” D.A.: Women live an average of five years longer than men. The reasons for this are both genetic and behavior-based. First of all, women have stronger immune systems, again due to estrogen which aids the fight against disease-inducing enzymes. But women are also less likely to engage in risky behavior. For example, I found that women are hit by lightning le…
/r/MensRights06/03/11 03:59 AM
36

I would never raise my hand to a woman unless I was attacked first. Why make the difference? for me, make that 'I'd never raise my hand to another person unless I feel threatened by them'
/r/MensRights03/02/11 04:32 PM
8

I aprove of the higher quality image format.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 04:32 PM
8

I've never seen anyone blaming fake rape accusation on feminism, but the fact that, even when they're fake, they screw a man's life and the liar normally doesn't get punshed.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 05:15 PM
1

All parents are the most awful parents in the world, because they never had children before their first one. Actually, this is kinda true. Good thing most learn fast.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:10 AM
5

It's somewhat surprising that boys are leading the girls by 25 points in the statistics They are leading by 50%, learn your statistics.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 10:56 PM
1

didn't say it wasn't :)
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:44 PM
1

but so is the idea of men “manning up” , it just doesn't that way anymore.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 03:46 PM
0

be a woman: shut the fuck up and bring me a sammich.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:52 AM
4

yeah, that wasn't the best of ideas, however, how are people accused of a crime inmediately guilty?
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:54 AM
3

Hey, just pointing out these biological differences include differences in the way of thinking (mainly different hormones, as far as I know), so it's not like there won't be non-biological, actual differences (steeming from the biological ones). I'm a true deffender of equal opportunities to everyone, but I don't think we'd go the right way if we didn't acknowledge the differences among people.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 06:38 AM
2

yeah, but that definition omits so much information it might as well be considered a lie. I'm not saying it's not the most common, I'm saying it's too unaccurate to be included as a definition.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 04:26 PM
2

but that definition is not accurate at all, as told in other threads.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 07:09 AM
8

respecting your last paragraph, I'd guess that it's because the so called feminism, that's usually just female supremacism under cover, has been taking rights away from men.
/r/MensRights26/10/09 02:31 AM
4

Pepsi's app is a joke FTFY sheez... have some humour people.
/r/MensRights14/10/09 06:07 PM
10

Didn't downmod you, but by what I read (not that much actually... you know, ts;dr) is that you are deflecting the issue from 'men have been socially castrated' (I like to be contraversial when I summarize something) to 'men should not harass women' which just adds gas to the fire since harassing usually means 'speak to a woman' according to some. edit: typo
/r/MensRights17/06/09 09:00 PM
1

This comes from the FBI's National Incident Based Reporting System, where data is collected from every single instance of the crime (rape) rather than guessing and estimating. uuuhhmm... and the investigation would be something like 'were you raped? ok, then we will convict some guy... wasn't him? oh, well whatever, we already got him, so whatever' Not saying that is always like that, it's posible that it's only on a couple of cases, but the fact that has happened don't give a lot of credibiliy …
/r/MensRights18/02/09 04:26 PM
10

"Discrimination means that you deny someone a right and the right in this case is a comfortable seat on the plane - and that's what they [men] will get. I think reaction to this is disproportionate. People take it personally - it's not a personal attack at all." You heard that black people, back to the back of the bus.
/r/MensRights17/01/09 12:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter