TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PigTenis Archive

View 1 post and 225 comments by PigTenis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

Freedom of choice! Wait sister not THAT CHOICE.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:44 AM
2

Mkay you just regurgitate the same message. Ok I understand your points are very valid now back to main subject... Not going to comment to comment the agenda, but I will show you some root causes that are behind some men that you use as examples to further it. You know why those few men are hateful ? When we engage in support of women rights this support is taken for granted. Its a demand. When the same men support mens rights there is no one to stand with them. They are branded as incels, radic…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 10:22 AM
12

Feminists sacrifice themselves for the cause - you go girls. You can do it, men bad. Men sacrifice themselves for the cause - you go girls. You can do it, men bad. Facts get pointed out. "It goes beyond men and women" People here fully support women rights, as you could ser men are ready to die for it. What upsets us is that they not only do not get credit, PR in western media tries to show Iran as tyranny of men. Of course since you are not biased asshole now you know and will inform your femin…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:05 AM
76

Yhm, yeah - courts sentencing a woman over threat of rape on a man. Fantasy?
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:22 AM
-52

Who cares, they go their own way so let them go their own way. Ironically, no one that seeks community to go your own way is going their own way.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 08:43 PM
19

That is somewhat accurate in a twisted way. Average man is not seen as human. Only extremely succesful or handsome men are seen as equal beings. Thats why they see so much inequality
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:29 AM
3

Solid sub recommendation my bro /s Stub your toe please.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:22 AM
1

5 year old becoming a mother ? OP you might have been bamboozled, thats not biologically possible.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:24 PM
38

Since there are no white men in position of total power and they live in democracy.... Congratulations, patriarchy defeated. Now you can dismantle those movements that wanted to defeat it. Of course unless they were never about it and now you will just find a new enemy a level or five below government and eradicate men of "some" power until none are left.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:09 AM
47

Its all fine and allowed by reddit admins as long as "proper and correctly-leaning" subs do that to users from "bad and incorrectly-leaning" subs. Ban every person with more than 10k karma on XXchromosomes from mensrights and admins will react within days, even if its like 3 people that come here to fight "wrong" views (and they are allowed as this sub has minimum moderation policy, they will get downvotes but thats usually all. Even if you spew shit like "its correct to let men die at war").
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:57 AM
1

So you did not bother to open the post and now you got arguments why Im incorrect. Sounds like you made up the conclusion before receiving information. Informing coworkers that you had a wet dream about them is not appropriate at work, never was. Try it in your school, tell the teacher you like that you masturbated while thinking about her. (How do I know you did not start serious work yet? Magic)
/r/MensRights16/08/22 05:56 AM
1

. Email exchanges between him and the woman, a researcher who described Keillor as a "mentor and employer" who "had power over me," see him making reference to sexual dreams about her. This post that you did not read, up there. Bolded letters "Garrison.....". Its a link, it will take you to a story.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:45 PM
3

Hold up. There is info in article he emailed her with info that he had sexual dreams of her. Folks, this may not be a false accusation.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:23 PM
2

Gaga is based like fuck. Watch her in The House Of Gucci before complaining. One thing she will apecifically not do is politically correct safe performance that you are so afraid of.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:17 PM
2

You know what, Id probably prefer if you gave me another downvote instead of trying to have a conversation.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:50 PM
1

Who cares ? Many people flocked to this sub, among those - some typical virtue signalling/overly sensitive redditors. Yeah that sub is woman centric, despite that OP should start there. Despite that, he will probably be ridiculed. He will find help here if he does not find there. Well unless *that type* of people is already a sizeable chunk of community here.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:28 PM
60

Isnt that London ? The town managed by a man of color, voted into his position democratically ?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 08:35 PM
-3

Try r/depression, its unisex. If you get banned and ridiculed - be sure to make screenshots. Then come here.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:05 PM
3

Age old technique - if your morals are questionable, ideas are poor and proposals for the world are badly written -> all you need is to find a common enemy that you can hate to gather support. Thats why its good to hate some groups but not the other. Hitler did it, Stalin did it, Nigel Farage did it... its activism 101. There are groups united towards hatred for LGBT too. Just to keep the balance, its not like its limited to one side of political spectrum.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:34 PM
1

Deep mistakes and assumption they were trained
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:37 AM
1

If you assume he was shit at his job, well I dont have facts to go against that interpretation. That is a real possibility. I guess you can use it to feel better, I still dont consider it anything close to being probable.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:18 PM
1

Ok a little Ockhams razor here. A trained therapist who knows what he is doing makes the patient feel dismissed as a result, to the point that he goes to complain to strangers on the internet Did that happen, or is the alternative just against how you would like to see the world ? No man, that person did not have control over the situation and did not intend for that result.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:15 PM
17

Explore other therapist opportunities. You should be the focus point not your ex GF sexual freedom. Act of cheating is a lie that ruins trust. A serious thing that can and should be discussed. Just one more therapist that focuses more on ideology than patient.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:05 PM
3

Client should not be proving facts to therapist using data and logic lol. Thats not the dimension to work in. A bad therapist disregarded feelings of the client over personal belief system (men cant be oppressed etc), time to change the therapist.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:09 AM
3

Feeling toxic today arent we?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:08 AM
15

Unironically yes. The one from the story heard their client say something that went against their opinions so they disregarded feelings of the client. A therapist who would pull such thing against generally accepted woke views would be grilled to unemployment. Maybe we should go for cancel culture treatment too.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:04 AM
9

Ok, at that stage you lost me. Remember that trolling has to be consistent
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:42 PM
8

Dude you are going to get a really nasty divorce that will leave you broke.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:36 PM
25

Step 1 - be handsome Step 2 - dont be ugly. Or at least become rich and look rich + confident. That also makes you handsome.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:03 PM
3

We cannot become a group that hates all women, women aren’t the enem No one does that here. Most dont even universally hate feminists.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:09 PM
3

Insult used to shut down people you dont like without any arguments.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:07 AM
3

Thats why its called eristics. Thats a whole branch of argumentation that is not based on facts. By stating that you are too privileged to see its "for equality" they make you seem like this oppressive son of a bitch. Arguments cannot be trusted and voila. Its almost impossible to get out of it if audience buys into that argument. And majority of population will but into that thanks to years of conditioning by the media, equality being seen as a good thing (so person using that word must have go…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:39 PM
18

Mostly it comes in forms of words like boyish/immature/whiny You were not called "Incel" ? Sounds like you were not even talking to the activists. But yeah, its always like that. And yeah they will attack you and your reputation. Avoid doing that at work if you want to keep it - HR is full of those women.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:20 AM
63

Thats a quote that alllows you to disregard and discredit opposing position without arguments. Genius in fact, wonder who created such disgusting eristics. Obviously not the copypasters you encounter.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:07 AM
2

Oh, and reddit told me its a conspiracy theory. Funny. Also an article wrote by a woman, cant pin that on MGTOW, RedPill, BlackPill, Purplepill or call the author an incel. Good job op.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:29 PM
26

Well, I can also think of actors. You could ask the actor to shave for role.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:06 PM
44

Thats a men centric sub but its not like MGTOW. Anyway, its not like you need community to go your own way.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:03 PM
64

Art world, business world, education system, justice system, labor market..... Not really surprised.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:06 PM
8

Well, you are out of arguments and out of your depth. Time to get back to Menslib or whatever is your choice sub I guess, the safe space where people are either aligned with your opinions or banned.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:12 PM
10

That where men lose…the mindset of “you didn’t help me so I won’t help you” rather than building inclusivity and togetherness in the quest for equality Well, like women-centric organizations could for decades? Decades when they enjoyed growing support of men who wanted better lifes for their wives and daugthers ? You are only using this argumentation because you want to gather support for your chosen political ideology. The moment its achieved you will come back to ignoring problems of men or ou…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:49 PM
30

Some men are reluctant to support womens cause because for last circa 2 decades women either did not support men causes or worked to obtain gender specific advantages. This sub is full of people aware of gender unequality of both kinds.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:31 PM
8

Feels like prochoice but also expecting prochoice for both genders not just 1 to have full control and other have the full liability. That expectation is of course enough to see screencaps from this sub flying around self proclaimed anti-hate groups.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:58 PM
7

I really like how mods here allow an obvious hateful post to stay, showcasing different views on the subject rather than policing the discussion to ensure only proper views are represented.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:19 AM
15

Way to go my Fuhrer - an idea to systematically invade body integrity of entire gender that is justified by "Men cause 99% of unwanted pregnancies". That 1% is unconsensual in-vitro I assume. Normally I would say - thats some troll throwaway account. You however are stupid enough to do it not only on your main but also mention the book you wrote... under your real name.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:13 AM
12

I'm Going To Vote Exclusively Pro-Life Republican in Every Single Election Until The "Paper Abortion" Becomes Part Of The Democrat Agenda. Well, thats a bold plan but be sure that democrats know about it. Otherwise by blind voting you might end up getting other things that come in a package with republicans without getting any closer to what you want.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:01 PM
4

Funny how self proclaimed egalitarian subs feel the need to segregate based on gender
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:56 AM
3

Menslib is a political sub that sometimes gets male-centric. Mensrights is a male-centric sub that sometimes gets political. As with all political subs, goal is to shift people to their agenda (radical, far from centrism) or eliminate them from community. This one focuses on radicalizing men.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:26 AM
11

Nice. Actually also shows how stupid they are. I recall it was 0,99 at least for a year if not more. They dont know it and dont measure it. Second is that.... they could still make up arguments to discredit it. Not good ones but good enough to defend their position in front of other morons. Third one is that... despite your post they will still cry about 1 to 0,77.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:55 PM
23

How to get banned from feminsit subs - ask about controlled pay gap.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:32 PM
0

Close to 80% are false. Its a crime that leaves a lot of evidence. Then, practically we should treat any unproven allegation as false. Anyone who argues that unproven ones should be treated differently by society is not acting in good faith.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 10:48 PM
40

Isnt the entire penalty undischargable to bankrupcy ? Other 10m is to repair the damage.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:58 AM
1

Oh, they flock really quickly. This one here came up with a reply in less than 3 minutes.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:03 PM
4

quicky became a toxic neckbeard who hated woman Majority of people here are heterosexual and dont hate women. Might be you - get help.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:01 PM
32

Should be available on request, for free, in hospital, without mothers consent. Wont be - government profits from fathers getting swindled into supporting a woman that otherwise would become a single mom.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:59 PM
4

Man, thats a death sentence at work. When corpo comes with new policy you smile and nod, then click "I acknowledge" and continue keeping your head down or get fired.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:12 AM
2

Unresolved daddy issues make them project all sort of things to older men. Any transgression gets amplified jn their eyes, they may get defensive the moment a man like their father comes into the room. Another example of how important good father is.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 07:45 AM
3

Look harder. Its not subtle lol.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 07:25 AM
17

Well, its almost as if author was forced to write a pro-pride article to keep a job but wanted to avoid harming any kids.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 02:00 PM
2

Thats the reward, you are respected for that. At least by the person you helped.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 07:31 AM
9

You hid under a rock for 20 years? Society supports women that come up with sexual assault allegations. Yes, including men. Even if they are fake.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 07:28 AM
-3

Government subsidised luxury hooker nurse for every boy hitting 14 years. We did it boys, incels are no more, terrorists lost the battle.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:59 PM
3

Dude, if your 1 line of comment needs 3 lines of a disclaimer to keep your ass safe from legal point of view -> it may be smarter to just not post it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:43 PM
5

Mostly presenting you as a facebook mom that forgot where she is, inventing stories about sexually successful involuntary celibates to justify your point. By now we are reaching limit when post has to be drilled down for more and you are at -20 up there so not much more people will come here.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 04:31 PM
3

I worked in domestic violence and rape crisis for 60 years which makes my internet persona stronger, and bad decisionmakers aka life morons need support but that does not make them victims. They screwed up. Thats it. Drunk driver hitting a tree is not a victim of booze. Patch him up in hospital, dont blame it on the booze but on them. (Really.... involuntary celibates types regularly tricking women into sex and marriage? You did spend 20 years on social media sites didnt you?)
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:22 PM
3

Yeah, well - some do become single mothers due to father getting hit by a truck. We should not hate on those. Thats the generous 10% of random situations I assumed. You asked for a percentage. Gave you one. u/the_sea_witch and her nonesense about getting "tricked" into a kid is just a grown up woman making a big decision too quickly with too little data. Aka moron.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 01:48 PM
4

Around 90% if by accountable you also hold them responsible for their decisions. Marriage is not something a mature person rushes into, abortions are there for accidental pregnancies, vast majority of marriages that were good at start can be held forever if both sides are committed and can work with eachother. There are moments when one side has to work more. Thing is, we made marriage decision easy, mariages are hard, and gave women a genser focused safety pillow to go out of it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:00 AM
101

Its good to shame video games, gun laws or 4chan. Its not good to shame parents, media, or lack of men mental health support. Logic is to use those dead kids against something they dont like.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:54 AM
10

Wait, its breitbart. Could be a fake story about feminist group supporting a man in struggle for equality. Any one fact checked ? Those things usually dont happen.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:39 AM
19

No, women do not hate men. Vast majority of them have husbands, boyfriends and sons. They spend great deal of their energy to make the men in their lives happy, investing their resources. What you see or hear is mostly internet. What people say is not a good representation, no one talks about the boring non-confrontational default. Radicals bubble up to the top.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:42 PM
0

The fact that women only scholarships exist is unequality in itself, you downplay that ("hey most are unisex") while behaving like you have some moral high ground. I just called you a sexist and a hypocrite, if its still not clear for you.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:00 PM
-9

Be pro equality create gender specific scholarships Choose one and make your choice wisely, sexists are not welcome here.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:19 AM
23

Well, its terrible for the wellbeing of those kids - a kid with single mom and governmental subsidy is essentially raised up by women only or the street. Not the best forecast for the kid becoming a productive adult.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 12:22 PM
12

Equal earning power means no alimony or child support. Show me one feminist activist that made a public comment about how woman X should not receive child support because she had equal earning power. There are tons of women like this in western countries. Should be a breeze if this was not a hypothetical strawman you made up to support your point.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:27 AM
8

Then there was that guy on men's lib who thought women raping men counteracted the patriarchy. Disgusting sub dedicated to radicalization of vulnerable men under a guise of a space where men can talk about their issues.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:23 AM
141

Well, of course - men can have issues as long as they can be pinned on patriarchy. Two birds with one stone - you can dismantle patriarchy and claim to be pro-equality at the same time. It also helps to gather support from vulnerable men -> that bro that was dick to you in high school? Guess what. TOXIC MASCULINITY.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 10:11 PM
1

At this point you are quite late. Ukrainian forces are on the offensive, it will be over soon. Then - in places that still are a warzone - your money will take effect in a couple of weeks (even with a charity)
/r/MensRights16/04/22 12:34 AM
-9

Folks, thats a troll post. She would have to get impregnated by a penis. You guys that fell for it dont know where babies come from.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:45 AM
20

Well, thats a rape. ​ Then, other thing that is also rape is when the woman intentionally forgets the pill. One that otherwise has 99% safety rate and usually allows to get scott free with a single pill forgotten.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:43 PM
1

Part and parcel of living in a great global city is you’ve got to be prepared for these things, you’ve got to be vigilant, Read your fuckin sources please. Actual quote has him using nicer language. There is no difference between "terror attacks are part of living" and "you need to be prepared for terror attacks when living in a big city". Time said Mr Khan “did not imply that terrorism is a part of everyday life in big cities – he said that preparedness is “part and parcel of living in a big ci…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:59 PM
0

In mid-break they pointed out who is nonbinary and who is trans in that show. I doubt that this came from the original author. Thankfully Puck was only queer. Now, I know the drift - lets hear the other problems you have with me.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:52 AM
1

Meh, you did nothing to begin with. Just complaining. Im still glad it ended quickly, thats nice of you.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:11 PM
1

The post getting huge doesn't mean you're right. That's a fallacy. That means I spend a lot of time to show it to you and others, told you why I consider that as a good example. There are no woke metrics or woke statistics maintained by department of woke so I used the next best thing. Despite that, here you are asking for more of my time. Im not sure you are worth it to be fair. You saw something you disagee with on ideological level - you will die on that hill using words you dont understand a…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:08 PM
1

Gave you an example - one sanctioned by government, media, and exported worldwide. I can give you more - how many until you concede and agree that UK is woke like fuck ? Even with one example post got huge. Or, if you are trying to debate the "Sadiq wont lose votes" part - he was re-elected in 2021 despite downplaying terror attacks (where people died) as an usual occurence in a big city. If bloody terror attacks are not enough for him to lose, he wont.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:04 PM
75

He wont - in UK they are indoctrinated to the bone now. I made a mistake and went to live broadcast of Shakespeare's play. Starring some big names (i.e Gwendolyn Christie). Apart from regular diversity-everywhere (with 50% cast being POC except for lead actors that actually had to know how to act) and inclusion of men in women clothing (dancers) ...Those people actually changed the plot of the play to fit woke criteria. In between acts there were interviews with the director, lady from Sky News …
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:11 AM
119

Thats the guy that downplayed literal terror attacks where people died as "normal in a big city" just because terrorists happened to be POC ? Yeah, I suppose internet community is aware of this sentient turd.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:03 AM
72

Use their methods against them - cougars are likely on higher positions. Thats a misuse of position to have sex. Wait for it to happen, report it via corporate legal/compliance (NOT HR!!!) channel. Voila - thats how you hunt cougars. They may be hunters by nature but its the man that is on top of the food chain.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:18 PM
2

Expectation is that society will pay for it. Society is us, proportionally paid according to our net tax paid (If you pay taxes but receive government handouts you may be receiving money not paying it). Now... which gender is the biggest net tax contributor ?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:36 PM
1

Statistically ? January to December with an exception of 29.02 every four years to recognize the part of history made through initiative/action of women. (Dont hate me girls - we are past that, nothing and no one is blocking you now - obtain education in STEM and show us how its done).
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:11 PM
4

I disagree - historically there was one clear gender that made history and one gender that typically followed the flow. When one was the driver and other was the passenger for majority of the ride, its plain lie to come up and say "your contributions are equally valid". Note that they usually followed the flow while trying not to get killed or raped( not through their fault) - thats another discussion. Not saying that entirety of history was glorious.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:04 PM
4

Bro - entire history of humanity is Mens History. Nearly all conquests, wars, great works of art, architecture, inventions, or atrocities. Why ask for a month when you got millennia ? (Oh this one is going to get hot on those self-proclaimed anti-hate woke subs).
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:03 PM
4

Yep. Its discrimination to expect X from men but not from women yet... you have to admit that it does shape men to be stronger at X.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:00 PM
3

To be fair..... in modern western world I see barely any advantages outside of muscle, peeing while standing and not being the one that gets pregnant. Ah - and we are taller. There used to be sexism at workplace - nowadays in any cozy job HR will fire you for a hint of that. You dont get advantages at courts, at public places, in transport, you dont get kids, you are not as respected as the mother, you need to earn your respect and love overall.... Thats a stretch but some advantage is that from…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:54 PM
14

Due to sexist bias. I suppose thats clear to you as well from the way you phrase the question. Dont hit back, anger her, get a visible yet safe injury or two. No amount of sexist bias at court or police can turn you into the aggressor if you were the only one to get hurt. If you want justice you might as well bleed a little to make sure you will get it.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:38 PM
8

Egalitarian values are innately anti-feminist. Yeah but you are not supposed to say it or you get called bigot and get banned from their subs.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:02 AM
2

This is a site to ask feminists questions Are you implying that feminism =/= equality ? Because that was a question about gender equality. That would make you a bigot, and could get you a response from mod about how your comment history is public etc etc. Dont be a bigot, promote gender equality.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:34 AM
29

Yep.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 09:40 PM
105

They have female leagues ? Thats nonesense, just let them play in the same one. Its like having female chess leagues..... *googles* oh....
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:48 PM
13

Is it sexist of him to not want to train US with a female student? Its very logical. He however made a mistake - if he quoted religious reasons he would be let go. Now he may be made into a sexist and incur a risk to his career anyway. (Of course he should have quoted a non-christian religion to be safe)
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:33 AM
69

That sub is about congratulating eachother on how the entire circle agrees and adores the left-winged talking points. It has little to do with men. Edit - its like making a "Women Boxing Club" sub. It has "woman" in its name but its about boxing. Menslib implies that its for men but its about politics, and dont you dare bring noncompliant views to the table.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:04 PM
4

Rights are usually equal (with a key difference being abortion rights and no legal abortion for men). Whats very different is the application of those rights. By constitution nearly every country has a provision that genders are equal. In practice - men tend to get longer sentences for same crimes. The list goes on.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:24 PM
2

, it is about enslavement to God. Thats actually worse, and never heard about it so far. Take care - above was considered hate speech over a vulnerable group. Dont repeat my mistakes as "people that encourage or incite violence or hate towards marginalized or vulnerable groups will be banned."
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:47 PM
3

In US your options are technically anti-male or pro-women at this point.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 12:57 PM
2

I suppose everyone agrees abuse needs to be stopped. This is not whats debated here (and I hope no one debates that). You asked about something entirely different, turned out to be opposite of what you claimed, now lets divert to statistics dont matter rhetoric? I think this subject is exhausted.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:00 PM
2

Honestly it’s not even feminism. Because there is not equality feminism is equality for both genders feminism My sweet summer child, you need to read this sub more. Feminism USED to be about equality. Now it creates the double standards. The activists were the ones that created an image of a male being the domestic abuser using fake statistics. Those activists were under a brand of womens-rights or equality. You can see your actual problems that feminism brings up in my sources, vs whats self-re…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:58 PM
10

Honestly I don’t feel like in these kind of situation statistics should matter They do matter because of organizations that for decades were teaching us that "domestic violence has a gender". Turns out it does not. To everyones surprise - men and women are equal in bad things too. Its so ingrained in social psyche that we actually started to believe it. You believed it a few hours ago, before you saw the disparity between what is self-reported and what is reported to the police. This means they …
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:43 PM
18

To be brief with sources I can give you quickly. University of Florida - on patters within young people Link - be sure to read how its explained ("empowment"), we will need to compare that later to self-reports.Similar comments from left-winged Guardian (in their quoted studies - 55% male) A study that explains the patterns and reasons - they are vastly different from men patterns and provide a good detox after reading articles above that explain the statistics with "maybe they retaliated agains…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:11 PM
30

Well, sexes are not treated equally when reporting on their abusers. This leads to difference in how severely are their cases under-reported. I once argued with a feminist about that, found a nice study from UK showing that when anonymously questioned it turned out that women were more likely to perpetrate domestic violence (55% to 45% or something of this sort). Should I look for it after work?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 01:25 PM
74

You write that post according to what gets reported to the police only, right?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:59 AM
-2

Sorry mate, I get bloated after more than 4 lines of copium. Not reading that 1 argument repeated 30 times. Gave you real case scenario that actually happened not too long ago. Vomiting out copium wont change the reality, only give me discomfort.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:56 PM
93

What would happen if just half a million of us young men stopped coming to work tomorrow? .... remember the discussion about ESSENTIAL STAFF and HEROIC nurses, delivery people etc during first waves of COVID outbrakes when no one was sure how it will go and no vaccine was available ? Everyone was so supportive of them. Until the danger went away. This would happen - a shitstorm for a month about how important they are and back to usual after danger goes away.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:46 PM
5

Yep. Reddit is sexist. Go figgure. I think Ill join this sub for some honest (no trolling) discussion with mild/politically correct responses. Lets see how long until moderator that likely curates the discussion towards sexism gets me banned for wrongthink. Edit - oh my god those posts are fuckin unreadable.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 12:57 PM
5

The point of posting this is that it couldn't have possibly happened on a worse day. ..... It was not an accident that "happened". It was planned to happen that day. This is a way to please the voters - the part that wants to "smash the patriarchy". It also costs nothing.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:16 PM
10

40% ? Oh nono - For 40% there was evidence that it was false, for 80% there was not enough evidence to say it was true. True figure is somewhere between 40% and 80%. According to the data, the conviction rate in cases where the court trials proceeded was less than 2 incidents out of every 10.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:44 PM
1

I too sometimes are in pain of having zero fuckin arguments. It sucks, makes you feel like trash, worth as much as your opinion you tried to push. I managed to limit those situations, by not engaging with topics I did not think through well enough. I also learned to open controversial links and reading until the end, as it may help me to find all the facts. You should try it.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:43 PM
1

she carried out the reproductive plans that SHE SAID they had talked about. That's a big difference! I value my time so im going to direct you here - you are making a conspiracy story about pressumed rape on his rights because the guy did not make a written legal document about his plans before drowning. Yes, last part about leaving the sub is also for you. Length of your post is not a challenge, sheer nonesense is. It was a pain to go through it, and a surprise one could write so much but say s…
/r/MensRights01/11/21 04:24 PM
0

You are making fake scenarios in your head, unrelated to the situation, adding fake assumptions and proclaiming you are right. Even in those fake scenarios - not so much - partially in the last paragraph using your assumptions (and only then). Its an art to lose debate to yourself lol. Its like comparing a couple that had sex to rape, because husband had no consent on paper. Yeah, and we had no indication of rape too. I read the article the OP posted about, and it's unclear whether this couple h…
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:13 AM
0

Read the article before getting outraged. They were planning children.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:03 AM
-2

Dude, you wrote a page of text to just paragraph after paragraph repeat the same nonesense. Misrepresentation of my point, strawman, slippery slope ("highest bidder sales").... dude, you need a therapist. His wife carried on the reproductive plans he had to her own personal detriment (single mom, no alimonies). Thats more reproductive rights than most of dead men. There was no auction, men are not cattle, calm down. Ideally - GTFO out of this sub because you are a liability. A broken person that…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 08:24 PM
17

I dont think there will ever be a law regulating it. They were married, intending to have kids. Just like wife by default has access to medical records of her family in case of accidents, or is allowed to decide how to bury the body. In order to keep his bloodline going - his wife became a single mom with no alimonies, making her life way harder than it should. The guys freedom was not assaulted after death for profit. You need to be a woman hater not a mens rights enthusiast to see it as infrin…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 03:37 PM
38

Erm... and why is it on mensrights ? The guy had a will against it ? Was he going to divorce her or what ? Or maybe the dead guy will pay alimonies now ? Which rights were broken? From what article says, his chosen life partner has continued their plans of having a kid together despite an accident. Totally acceptable stuff if you exclude documenting all that shit on instagram.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:20 AM
11

Yeah I know the risks but as long as people keep things civil Yep, here we are. You either not know the risks or lie about being ligthly moderated and your definition of civil is actually close enough to what redditors dont boycott to stay afloat. You want example ? The moment posts like "trans women should not compete with women at sports" get highly upvoted instead of deleted for transphobia - you will be on one of the self proclaimed "against hate" subs. Majority of people think this way so y…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 11:19 PM
23

I have taken over the r/GenderRights subreddit, and really want it to be a progressive discussion about the problems all genders face. Men, women, trans, If you do that - there will be people demanding to take your sub down. You will be let to maintain your sub in peace only if you delete opinions that are haram. Dont say you were not warned. Being "lightly" moderated is what led mensrights to get a dedicated hate grup at r-againstmensrights with 20k+ members.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 11:02 PM
91

Nah - thats a great and surefire way to recognize toxic women. Let them be - we need the early warnings !
/r/MensRights13/10/21 09:48 PM
12

Female students and academics are extremely politically active, more so than the men and more likely to protest Is it a protest if you are protesting for something that is generally accepted and no one will prosecute you for that ? Would call that rather a happening. No one will be angry at you in North Korea if you protest around with support to the government. Men are naturally less conforming with what is generally accepted. Thats most of the story behind this 20% disproportion.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 10:12 AM
17

To be fair, men are naturally and culturally more inclined to speak up against something that is wrong. Yes, im coming up here in this sub and speaking up that this is not evidence of male discrimination. True problem of this statistic is that anyone is penalized for free speech on campuses, not the gender statistics (in this case correlation is not causation). Those people are injecting culture and politics into scientific process that gave us modern civilization.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:59 AM
1

..... dont be a moron and dont write about politically incorrect topics in places where you are at mercy of other people. Like school for example. As you are on their mercy - if they cannot use facts, they will use force.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:50 PM
0

Wait are they really replacing James Bond with a woman? No, they are not and people here are spreading fakenews. Bond got retired so his title of 007 passed on to a woman. She turns out to be ambitious but recognizes Bonds superiority near the end. Also... she executes a civilian for being racist by pushing him into vat of acid. Thats a war crime. She also fucks up every solo assignment in the movie. Thats not a feminist message, thats a token black-strongwahmen-possiblylesbian in order to keep …
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:52 AM
2

So I watched it and there was not a single moment where Bond would be degraded by a woman or for being a man. They made a black feminist character in the promos, but she turns out to acknowledge Bonds superiority at the end + is a major fuck-up if you think about it. OP, did we watch two different movies or are you spreading fakenews ? The fact that he has a kid does not ruin him as a man at all. Actually half of us will statistically end up with daughters.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:49 AM
21

If you open a new Reddit account, you're automatically subscribed to r/twoxchromosomes What? No fucking way. Edit - fuck I checked it. Cant believe it but,... 13.2 m subscribers to this hatesub did not come there out of their own volition.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:31 PM
12

So this is your angle then - argument that this entire sub is anti-feminist in its core <3. Took you long enough to get here. Opened it - a group of people getting collectively angry at a post with a most common argument men hear used against them about "how men in power have it good". This obviously in context why men deserve less rights. It would actually become clear to you why its upvoted that high if you went to the top upvoted comment of what you posted. For reference : rest of sub https:/…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:33 PM
15

You are comparing random people that are simply tolerated here (and going against an ideology that is in fact often at edge with idea of mens rights) versus an organized community united under a single purpose, against a single other community. Those two things are not the same, not even close.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:52 PM
21

well..... did you see r/ againstmensrights ? Yeah - so much about "both sides are wrong to look at most insane members". Thats 20 000 people spending their time on digging through all the content to pull up those insane people as an example to convince all the others that sub has to be eradicated. This is how to make propaganda to combat foreign ideologies, has nothing to do with "people tend to view groups, everyone is a little biased" crap. Its not an accident if you do it on
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:56 PM
129

Propaganda. Your audience will not listen to other opinions if you tell them those people are "toxic" and "liars". Multiple times I had my arguments (about something totally unrelated) ignored and instead I got a response "dont read his post about finance/economy - he is posting on r/MensRights". Religions did it since the dawn of time. Such people are broken beyond repair, too bad that there is so many of them.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 09:31 AM
18

At Menslib you will hear that the root of male problems is patriarchy. If you disagree, they will ban you to equalize the privilege. Thats an echo chamber not sub about men. Here, its more difficult to get a permaban for wrong opinions. This also means you may hear some opinions you dont like (and people from across reddit would love to see banned).
/r/MensRights28/09/21 04:05 PM
227

Wow, I adore the level of internal emotional life and narration this lady is spinning about the world in her head. Thats like entire LOTR if its quality was coming from an insecure teenager. First date oh my god oh my god. Want to get a lift ? Nooo thats creepy oh god oh god. Oh god dont start the engine, DONT START THE ENGINE LIGHT WILL GO ONOh god she actually wants a lift ! UNSAVORY MEN DOWN THE ROAD, MUST BE RAPIST GANG. What a horrible reality! 20 years ago we would call her a schizophrenic…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:20 AM
8

Yes, I was making fun of the stupidiest argument that is thrown at my (our?) face over and over again. Its probably the one that we hear the most when hate groups are trying to justify creation of inequality. Not making any additional arguments for discussion, I dont think OP's post brings any new points to the table for discussion. Now, you created a throwaway account just to tell me you got triggered?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:58 AM
51

But hey, majority of CEO's are men and nearly all presidents! You should feel the privilege! /s
/r/MensRights24/09/21 02:40 PM
16

First story - she was shittesting you. It does not prove she is an agressive person or anything, just a moron who heard about a solution on campus and did not think it through. Teaching is great but does not fix things in time horizon of less than 2 generations so your solution was appropriate. Just not the solution she wanted to hear. Typical lady moronism when they hear an idea and bring it home (just on feminism, mine was bringing financial advice from her friends. Too bad I got a degree in t…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:47 PM
9

Anyway, No one is dividing the world into binaries. But there are oppressive groups and there are oppressed groups. .... you literally divided the world into binaries in the next sentence. Are you even serious ? I need you to understand that there is no such thing as patriarchy leading the society. A boogieman created by people who divided the world into oppressors and oppressed. To easily justify to others who the enemy is. You are the one making false assumptions, this is your base. Dont expec…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:42 PM
18

The root cause of hating men is also misogyny believe it or not, because oppressed groups generally hate their oppressors, but the oppressed group cannot systemically harm their oppressors like oppressors can harm the oppressed. Root cause is built on false premise, therefore no wonder the result is also gibberish. You divided the world neatly into oppressive groups (inherently bad!) and oppressed (inherently good, victims). This may make some sense in a commune of 20 people, but is totally wron…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:04 PM
35

And im looking for any issues that would make sense under the premise of "fault of patriarchy". And as you could see - I had trouble finding them. Those "systemic" issues people talk about are under an assumption that more than half of political leaders are men. Due to that (and a huge dose of identity politics bullshit) they assume that if a man voted for X this means that men did it to themselves. Such thinking is built on false premise assuming that men in power are somehow a part of "male" g…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:36 PM
72

Go to the great echochamber of Menslib - they will explain patriarchy to you and then ban you if you disagree. Possibly some problems are caused by other men, in some circles we are being harsh to eachother. Still - would not say that a guy being mean to another guy is a core of male issues if one can simply walk away. MAAAAYBE it could be more of an issue a few hundred years ago when social expectations were a bit brutal and defined by men only.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:18 PM
0

Yes, I know what I posted. 1-3% is the statistic for rape accusations that were not only dismissed but also led to the lady getting convincted. Actual statistic we should be using is % of failed cases. Precisely as you wrote - evidence not strong enough to say rape has even happened. Pressumed innocense is not a luxury, its a right. Those guys are not lucky to avoid consequences, they were brought in front of court and went through the accusation despite no evidence against them and this itself …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:46 PM
1

Arent the 2% or 1-3% the ones that get convincted for false accusation? It should be the % of accusations that were not proven at court. Yes, this is what im saying - if an accusation is so weak that there is no convincing evidence presented at court then it should be considered as false for statistical purposes. See you on some self-proclaimed "against hate" subreddit with bunch of hypocrites anonymously hating on me for posting that
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:09 AM
1

Its pro-equality therefore wont be implemented.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 10:58 AM
9

Well, they are openly saying they will reject candidates from work based on their genitals. Thats technically discrimination, however its so hardcore that its unlikely that the company will last too long in automotive industry so I would not get too worked up.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:12 PM
18

Somewhere in history - yeah, probably. Probably even a lot of such periods. Much less than femminists claim when using the "patriarchy" argument (due to focus on kings & nobles, rather than majority of men who were poor like fuck) but yeah - there likely were some periods & places like that given the large sample.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:18 PM
18

What do you guys think? Next step - HR. This is what I think. She will try to cancel you now. You dont debate with feminists, you avoid them. Especially at work. As well as anything that tells you about its preferred pronoun (even if its he/she).
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:44 AM
2

There are groups that hate male spaces. Those people are making posts all around reddit whenever any of people here makes a trans joke, questions if pronouns are needed or posts a story about fake rape accusation. And well, from time to time we do have people posting stuff that would get them banned elsewhere. Considering that reddit is sensitive like hell, this is a good fuel for their fire.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 09:31 AM
3

it’s the only thing they respond to. Or take the guy to HR to get him fired. Remember its 2021.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:26 PM
4

If you speak up at the presentation you will be fired for sexual harassment. If you want to do something about it, meet with HR after the meeting. Still may end up badly.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:25 PM
3

Heh - assholes in youtube. Now this will require a credit card or ID right ? I was convinced those age restrictions are for adult content like tits, sex and mature content. At least for a while. They moved to use it for censorship immediately.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:20 PM
5

Precise estimations only. Otherwise we would vote "within a year" and always be correct. 24h?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:13 PM
18

Everyone place your bets on when its going to get banned. Its live 16 minutes and counting, whoever is closest to predicting its life length gets an upvote.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:18 PM
3

Oh wow, this deserves to be reposted everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:37 AM
1

You quickly moved from "sweet summer child" to "its unfair treatment, no forum is one thing, those were individuals". If individuals post and no one deteles it - community needs a mod (MGTOW 1) If individual posts and mod does not care - it is allowed. If posts are getting many upvotes, get in the top posts, and are allowed - thats the actual sense of community. Actual sense of MGTOW 2 was talking about women not self improvement. MGTOW 1 was not moderated at all. You can thank the moderators fo…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:40 AM
1

Dont worry, I wrote that knowing that defenders of MGTOW presenting this sub as simply self-improvement community are full of shit. Technically I lied - it was a trap question.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:58 PM
0

Sorry, I dont know what language is that.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:00 PM
-2

Aaaaaand posts about end of western civilization had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:49 PM
2

Why isnt FDS banned calling men low value scrotes? Yes, did you post in on r/AgainstHateSubreddits with examples so that wider reddit society can see it and eventually ban it ? (Yeah, it wont happen but this is how they got MGTOW - posts like OP presented and years of PR strategy instead of whining).
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:38 PM
-1

You are on censored media dumass. If you want to use it you learn to play the game or you get canceled. u/catsinbananahats gave you a nice example how not to do that. Now - you may voice all your concern about it and cry about unfairness of the situation on r/MensRights all you want. It wont change shit. If you want to change shit you educate people (in a nice way if you want them to listen), become a moderator, or scram and let adults do the MensRights thing (especially if you think pussytalk l…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:27 PM
-1

Yeah, standard ideologic push just like the one that consumed neutral wikipedia. I did enter it a few times and it seemed like a bunch of guys who forgot where they are (leftist site), forgetting about basic safety requirements. They were giving left-winged radicals evidence they needed to get them banned and here we are. If you go to r/AgainstHateSubreddits you can see them making posts about single comments here. We fail at PR management - we need to do better.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:01 PM
-2

A question - or rather an invitation to prove me wrong. Was the sub indeed self-improvement only & in line with (sensible) MGTOW idea?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:41 PM
-4

And..... moderator was keen to keep all the people there focused on self-improvement rather than circle-jerking about how all women are bad? (Yes, I do recognize female subs like that are not banned and some are even moderated by the powermod that is likely behind all of this).
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:30 PM
2

Yep. Things you said. They were wrong. Not you. You are a person. Moreover, after a brief exchange I can see that you are bothered by the same things I am so... partners?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:04 PM
2

I never considered you my enemy, and im worried what did I say that made you think this way. This is not a duel, you are not in a ring. Such mindset injects unnecessary agression into the discussion.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:00 PM
3

Eh ? Im welcoming you to the sub. I am not your enemy. If you at least partially agree that world would be better without systemic sexism than without it - you are our ally.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:44 PM
3

I believe you wanted to write "systemic sexism" If im correct and it bothers you - welcome to r/MensRights, you are not forced to abandon other beliefs.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:40 PM
4

No one goes against women here. Many of us (if not all?) are reacting to those issues in our daily lives. Its also not like you will be banned from here for participating in feminist subs etc. You are now making an argument "but you can be racist to asians too". Yeah, and... how does it invalidate systemic issues taken up by BLM?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:38 PM
3

Hey - Obama was in power. Systemic racism should be eradicated, right ? Unfortunately no. One person (even in power!) did not make a difference. Together we can. Now, you keep avoiding the question - does systemic sexism even bother you?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:35 PM
3

The system is run by men. Thus it can’t be a gender issue against men. I think I explained that in the first reply to you. Scroll up. The difference between policymakers and "all men". Its like saying BLM does not matter because Obama was president for 8 years and was in power + police chiefs are often black. Now, to cap it up because you did not answer : Are you against systemic sexism and willing to support us? This does not mean you need to start hating someone else. Its about awareness and c…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:31 PM
3

So why are we worried about men and not women mutilation? I assure you - everyone here is also against mutilation of female genitals. Its not discussed as often as its not done as often in western world anymore. Even backwards countries understood its wrong. You need to stop seeing it as a war between genders. You can speak about a problem with something that happens to young boys without wanting it to happen to young girls.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:23 PM
2

Yep. Dont report it. Archive it and report to police. Child porn is a serious issue - this is not some 14 year old behind VPN writing the n-word, its far too serious to leave it for reddit admins.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:14 PM
3

So why is this sub called “men’s rights” and not human rights? Why is it "Black lives matter" not "All lives matter" you ask ? I think its also well explained in every identity politics dictionary but ok. ->Because systemic issues we deemed important specifically target this demographic. People here are also members of many other subs and not automatically "against someone" and it does not mean "all" dont matter. Its not an attack on anyone.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:12 PM
4

Ah I see - you cannot comprehend what I posted because you see "Men" as a group instead of individuals. We may be speaking English on the surface but you in fact speak "identity politics". Obviously this means you cannot understand our posts, and us to see you as a moron. First of all you need to understand that there are no "men doing X" there are "individuals". Society through votes (depending on their options, usually of two parties or candidates) selects representatives. People in power who …
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:01 PM
4

If you saw it - report it to police. Reddit site reacts only when police or media gets involved. (Wasnt there already a post about a reddit employee/moderator who got accused of child porn or something?)
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:53 PM
12

Yes, Turtle is curating those subs to promote his ideology. You are shocked ?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:52 PM
1

lol, thats a good sarcastic joke post. You need to remember about /s to indicate thats a joke so people dont downvote as if it was a real serious opinion.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:39 PM
-26

This sub was essentially unmoderated, dont be fooled with "going their own way" being something about self-improvement - it was mostly focused on women (that were supposed to be no longer in sphere of interest of MGTOW members)
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:34 PM
8

There are areas where after social shifts in last 100 years men are no longer treated fairly. None of us (neither you) in your lifetime will be in "political or financial power" "1% of the 1%" etc. Most of us however: - will want to hook up -> we will have to be the ones to worry if consent documentation we have is strong enough to keep us out of trouble. - will want to enter a relationship with a woman -> we will be the ones that need to consider risk of unequal treatment if divorce happens. - …
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:27 PM
2

Yes and no - there is also an active group of people across different subs spreading fakenews about male-centric spaces and powermoderators that faciliate it. Check r/AgainstHateSubreddits what are the top posts about this sub. Then compare the claims they make and amount of upvotes (i.e 700, 800) with actual source material. Usually thats some comment with 10-20 upvotes out of 200, under a post about something else. 700 people quietly outraged about one guy here. MGTOW was unmoderated, so it wa…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:17 PM
0

Yep. And in current political climate we cannot afford to radicalize small groups of men. Thats even worse decision when we decide to radicalize instead of educating the regular ones. Not to mention that... echo chambers solve nothing and achieve nothing. Just a group of people congratulating eachother. Unpopular opinion - this sub should start banning posts about general hatred towards women. It devolves the discussion to wrong waters (women, not feminist). They are later used by i.e r/AgainstH…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:27 AM
4

You are correct in terms of their ideological manifesto. Practically, those communities devolve into talking about women instead of trying to better oneself.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:53 AM
-6

I just gave you an entire instruction. That question may have sounded good in your head but proves you did not give a fuck enough to even read my reply. If you are ready to move out of sight and stop talking about your rights to people who dont respect them just because you felt uncomfortable, maybe you dont deserve them.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:18 AM
-4

Show off your ban on ModsAreKillingReddit and move on. Its not like actual damage was done to you and you can still damage them. Thanks to actions like that i.e everyone knows that FemaleDatingStrategy or TwoXChromosomes are sexist subs dedicated to radicalize women. Who are you going to educate on your discord with 10-20 people who already agree with you?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:11 AM
-7

Part of activism is to go to people that disagree with you ideologically to present validity of your statements. Reddit is PERFECT place for that. Moving elsewhere is just creating an another circlejerk when you can sit down and talk with other likeminded people about how much you agree with them.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:52 AM
1

Then you started explaining the guys actions/line of thinking and telling me why I am wrong in describing him this way. Thats defending. As with the 2nd thread - you asked a question about a statement you disagreed with, then started disagreeing further. Inquiring about information does not seem to be your original purpose ? (notice how adding a question mark does not change this into a question?)
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:30 PM
1

I don't recall saying that, teaching them certain ideas that are beneficial according to the party You -> That's valid for countries where the army is controlled by a party. ​ That's a terrible evidence. Well, would it help if I showed you who is the final commander of the army in the countries? Usually president or prime minister. Always someone who is elected (or a dictator). I don't see why you ask if I get it though Well, you said you dont get it and called it a conclusion of a feminist arti…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:28 PM
1

Can we agree it also doesn't represent the vast majority of people here? Never said that. You started defending that specific guy I commented about. I don't really understand your last paragraph, can you rephrase please? If you want to defend that guy, and still think he is worth defending - I either missed something or you disagree with one of the statements. If yes - I asked you to show me what you disagree with or what I missed.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:08 PM
1

Ok, so you skimmed over a few arguments but I can work from here. You agreed that ideas are presented to half of population if party controls the army. It happens that almost in every country army is controlled by government. You could argue about independent president and stuff but we know its bullshit, its just party running for separate offices. Governmental supervisor of the armed forces may be at best from different party. Here - an article about how personality changes. Add both together a…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:03 PM
1

Neither is a personal jab you made against me. Thats an agressive line of argumentation, I hope we can agree on that. There is a claim there but its not substantiated with anything - I hope we can agree on that as well. Half of it is "pigs misandric pigs" rant - again I also hope we can agree that this is not something generally percieved as a strong and level headed response. So..... If you still after that see that guy as a prime example of what we should show as r/MensRights activist to the p…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:44 PM
1

How can male-centric militarism hurt position of women? Those drafts - they are not there to defend the country, draftees are shit soldiers that leave after 1 max 2 years (so soon after they learn how to hold the gun). They are there to take half of population and get a compulsory grip on them, teaching them certain ideas that are beneficial according to the party (yeah, fascist vibes you get about this idea are correct). What happens in the long run is that military and military men / strong me…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:31 PM
1

I think you dont like my arguments but cannot counter them with any of your own.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:21 PM
1

Ok, thats not the topic - we know the modern feminist is hostile towards men. Is that line of argumentation anything that should come from a mature mens mouth ? You wont change anything by looking like a harmed crybaby -> logic, facts, keeping calm, pretending to respect (people will nowadays reject conversation if you dont at least pretend)
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:00 PM
1

Nono dude, the fact that I gave you a notification was intended to let you know (not to hide stuff from you). It was not an indication im interested in your opinion.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:29 PM
1

Reality is -> im not sure what will happen in Peru. In the long term the trend I could observe is that male-centric militarism was....hurting position of women. In short term, its an extra obligation that is being put on our shoulders - you tell me if Peru rewards us adequately for it.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:19 PM
0

The guy getting emotional ad ad-personam immediately as if attacked or in danger. That shows weakeness, if this is how he shows r/MensRights to others outside of this sub - they will see us as such. Logically this movement is correct, so others try to label it as a hate group full of weak men. Exhibiting such behaviour does not help. Edit - his latest comment. Because feminism is all about female superiority, which means giving women all the benefits and exceptions. And that, quite really, makes…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:17 PM
-1

You make a pretty good case about validity of fragile masculinity. Not sure if this is something you intended, and not sure if this is something you should be promoting on this sub.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:55 PM
-1

Yeah, and? I would not mind being subjected to that if I were to receive the male privilege I am accused of having from all the sides. Your reply tells me that you did not last past first row. You need to learn to hold your keyboard long enough for the first wave of emotion to pass.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:16 PM
-5

Such approach is .... better for society as both genders are good at different things. This however leads to unequality, and since we as western society went with this idea of everyone being equal and equally valid -> cannot be applied. Still, it would be some progress over what we have now in the west.. Now our society is committed to equal privileges (that end up unequal, as we see on this sub) but not committed to equal expectations -> leading to men being fucked thrice as much as there. Befo…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:53 AM
15

You dont know what she went through. Its certain that patriarchy pushed her to do it, she is a victim /s
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:42 AM
29

Well, its logical when you know that ladies spend majority of household incomes. The clothes shop are a good example - the floorspace you observe reflects spending disparity.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:35 PM
2

Before you downvote me to hell, If you use facts here (that you can substantiate, especially when controversial) you will not be downvoted to hell.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 04:27 PM
2

Maybe yes, maybe not, maybe you are the crazy person. There’s a duality to everything imo. Dont you agree?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:48 PM
5

There’s a duality to everything imo Only if you are afraid to take a side or to defend a disgusting point that is otherwise undependable with "well, maybe there is a grain of truth in it, not everything is black and white, there is duality in everything imho". Saw it applied to child slavery once. Hilarious but also manipulative and evil. What is happening there, let me put it straight to you (or rather the readers that come here, I think you understand it pretty well). Reddit users (famous for …
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:29 AM
1

This guy here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/oib7ki/crosspost_why_are_there_so_many_more_homeless_men/h4uct2p/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Gave you a nice summary. Most upvoted explanations circle around denial, men blaming, and telling us women have it more difficult anyway.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:58 AM
5

Thats a classic move when you dont agree with something. You start inventing reasons. If you can substantiate them, those are facts. Those people just invent stuff out of their asses. They are exactly like blokes that spill out "Women dont become CEO's because they are inherently bad managers" without substantiation. Thing is, a comment like that would get -50 downvotes and a ban for sexism on most subreddits including the one that "male" question was posted.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 10:14 PM
27

Yep. Sexism, you cannot even report them - mods are so used to hate of this kind that it does not create any reaction in them.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 08:29 PM
23

Thats a good crosspost. Comments are glorious. As usual, reddit is so far to the left it tilted to the right and resulted in prejudice.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 07:54 PM
11

"Hey, women are worth jut as much as men, aren't they?" - majority (or all) people on this sub dont deny that at all. Where does this idea come from ? Since you base your entire post on this strawman .... I must call it worthless. What you may be missing is that feminism as applied in modern times is usually not about equality. This is where our problems with it come from - the great idea of equality was hijacked by people who are in fact not egalitarian.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:02 AM
23

Im getting those all the time. Thats a common courtesy & is quite annoying when people outside of your closest family do it. I need to start posting on twitter how unsafe I am I guess.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:50 AM
0

This sub looks like fun. I think Ill join it and see how it goes. Edit, im trying to read the new posts in an effort to join into an honest debate but this shit is unreadable. I can see them use english words but fuck, its gibberish. I regret the day I added it to my feed.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:19 PM
9

Feminist telling them it's ok to cry. This does not help male situation at all. - First of all, crying fixes nothing. Action fixes things. - Second of all, if you are trying to build a case against the overinflated strawman of toxic masculinity - in those rare cases when men attack men for crying, it is also up to men to fix it. It sucks not because "its not ok to cry". It sucks because you lack acceptance of your peers and you fall to the bottom of male group hierarchy. An article from a woke w…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 04:22 PM
82

Ah yes, the good old "I know you are a good guy, but remember - dont rape your coworkers" type of video.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:35 PM
92

Bad stereotypes - sexism. Good stereotypes - also sexism. Good stereotypes about men - totally sexism Bad stereotypes about men - equality.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:33 PM
39

Reverse situation promoting men only would be declared illegal and ignored or adapted against his will.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:16 PM
8

Also is it really true that 97% of women have been sexually assaulted? It comes from an UK NGO that extended the definition to the max possible extent. Its also a common practice to question members and supporters of the NGO rather than random people. Under same standards, 97% of men would be sexually assaulted too.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 09:14 AM
11

Dating Coach..... To get a man lady simply needs to make herself open on any physical or virtual space. No coaching required. Its getting more difficult to land the top men, and I suppose thats why they are coaching eachother - average Joe is not even a material worth considering as a goal.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 11:16 PM
9

Man, - dont be afraid of the word "Rape" - its just a word. - We are perfectly aware of double standards here and how legal principle of assumed innocence does not always work in context of a rape accusation. - Rape is a male issue because society made it an issue for us. Forcing the 99% normal guys to consider if sleeping with a potentially crazy lady is a good idea or to think twice about hosting a corporate 1:1 meeting with lady in a closed room (there is a reason why they are all made of gla…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 02:05 PM
1

By results, and estimating an average based on how well you do. Then subtract 1 from the score, as you probably see yourself better than you are. Girls assign different priorities to different things. For some you will never be even a 7 with 5'9, others wont mind. Thats why its the average you seek.
/r/askTRP14/11/20 01:14 AM
1

Getting people (i.e the other guy) to beat you up to a pulp is most likely scenario. A lot of people would agree to beat you up after seeing this post alone, not to mention friends and family of the girl.
/r/askTRP13/11/20 11:20 PM
1

Is it possible to keep her around for a while as a slave to mentally abuse? Probably less than a week. After that you might be in trouble when she realizes that and takes retaliation. You probably deserve some.
/r/askTRP13/11/20 11:16 PM
8

Women who get into arguments with a specific person all the time have strong emotions regarding this person. Simple as that. They dont understand it as well. You will see that in relationships - once woman gets neutral vs her man - its over. Note that it will be a conflict over ANYTHING. A woman who gets into conflict with specific idea, not a specific person has strong emotion vs the idea not the person.
/r/askTRP13/11/20 04:44 PM
12

Good job, you had so much casual sex it feels like masturbation now. Technically, if you have zero emotional connection with the woman its basic - like masturbating. You will feel the acomplishment again if you find one nice woman in long term relationship. I believe CRP never denied that long term is fine, as long as you steer clear out of damaged women and are ready to walk away if they start acting funny.
/r/askTRP13/11/20 08:15 AM
6

Dating apps are for the ones that have trouble on the regular sexual marketplace. Good women dont have that problem. Also, to be honest - male behaviour on dating apps is also probably not encouraging them to stay (you guys know what im talking about).
/r/askTRP12/11/20 07:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter