TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Piggles_Hunter Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Piggles_Hunter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, you've got it. The context of the thread points towards saying there were no black or brown people at Dunkirk and it's unrealistic to have them there. The film shows colonial troops, which is accurate. Although I would say that the portrayed proportion of French troops depicted in the film gave the impression there were fewer there than there actually were, but that's just nitpicking. It was telling the story from the perspective of the BEF after all. As for women, I haven't said anything …
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:39 PM
1

That means it would be more realistic to have them in the film than not.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:21 PM
1

Could you point out where I said there were no black people in the film? If I can suggest something, reread the title of the post and the thread up until my reply for context and it might make better sense to you.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:08 PM
12

Parts of the colonial units present for the invasion fell back to Dunkirk, along with the BEF and remnants of the rest of the French Army. Some made it across in the evacuation, some were captured, some were killed and others went on to serve in the Free French Army. There were not many other places for them to go in May to June 1940, it was complete chaos.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:28 PM
4

Here are all the sources I've linked so far. http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=24173 Grandes Unités Françaises compiled by the historical service of the chief of staff of the French Army. From that source: 1st North African Infantry Division 1st Moroccan Division 5th North African Infantry Division 2nd North African Infantry Division are shown to be present during the invasion. Each division has about 4-6 regiments. Many of them pulled back into Dunkirk during the ensuing chaos to be e…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:56 PM
2

The source is Grandes Unités Françaises compiled by the historical service of the chief of staff of the French Army. https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Les_Grandes_unit%C3%A9s_fran%C3%A7aises_historiq.html?id=jOsiAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:31 AM
6

I've already sourced the claims. There is also nothing stopping you from picking up a history book and actually reading it instead of arguing from a position of ignorance on the internet.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:47 AM
1

I saw the film and thought it was a very good film, but not so historically accurate although much better than most "historical" films. You'd be forgiven for thinking it wasn't even in France. You realise you're talking to me over multiple threads? Why are you getting so upset? It's just history.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:38 AM
2

1st North African Infantry Division 1st Moroccan Division 5th North African Infantry Division 2nd North African Infantry Division There were others aswell, but you should get the point by now. Many of those that weren't captured or evacuated went on to form units in the Free French Army.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:36 AM
-2

I think you're starting to reach now.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:18 AM
1

The person I was replying to was insinuating there were none by questioning the point of asking why there were no minorities in the film and referring to an understanding of history as to the answer.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:05 AM
12

http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=24173
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:48 AM
19

From memory the Indians were deployed for logistics, I'd have to crack open a book to be sure. There were not that many on the British side, around 1,000 to 2,000. On the French side these were mostly combat troops where most of the colonial forces were present for the invasion, although roughly a quarter were stationed elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:43 AM
10

Senegal, Mauritania, and Niger
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:35 AM
32

http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=24173 There was also four contingents of Royal Indian Army Service Corps. I think one of them ended up getting captured. You have to remember both countries were global colonial powers still when the war broke out.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:30 AM
48

It would be more historically accurate to have people of color in the film. About 10,000 of them were killed during the invasion from the French army alone out of the 100,000 deployed. EDIT: Forgotten history like this can often be incredible and confronting to people. When looking at things like this it can be tough to put contemporary bias aside. But whatever the case, downvoting my comment won't rewrite history, I'm afraid. http://imgur.com/a/i9SfK
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:17 AM
7

You actually appear to be a below average under-achiever and pretty frustrated with your situation by the looks of it. You're just blame shifting and it seems women are the ones you have an axe to grind with. Especially those evil single mothers. Good luck with that and everything
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 03:17 AM
3

Did you fail economics?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:37 AM
20

Affleck is pretty regressive to me as a lefty. Although I'm more old school left like maher where were nothing is viewed as being above criticism. I think the popular left is becoming pretty regressive.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 10:28 PM
34

Time for him to sue.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:30 AM
1

What does that even mean?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 07:25 AM
0

I think you have a very biased view. Some people are shit, most are not.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 04:53 AM
-3

I must have missed that class where I was supposed to be encouraged to do those things then.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 04:14 AM
-1

Do you think this is a problem on the most part unique to women?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 03:16 AM
-1

There are many aspects of American culture which foster and nurture narcissistic behaviors in young women specifically and, in many cases, portray what would otherwise be dangerous or even criminal behavior as "empowering". Such as?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 12:54 AM
1

Screen shots of the convo isn't good enough evidence, as someone pointed out in a different comment chain. It doesn't prove that she physically picked up the phone and typed out the messages. There's a few things that can clear that though, like talking about something that only the two can know about or she admitting she made the texts.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 12:52 AM
2

The thing is is that's not what it looks like and it's this sort of thing that people rip into with this sub. Stuff like this just provides ammo to the subs detractors.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:49 AM
15

Looks like it. Looks more like cherry picking by someone with an agenda rather than taking a serious look.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:34 AM
5

Are these in the same jurisdiction?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:32 AM
2

I've been in a male changing room a bunch of times and I'm a women. Men don't give a flying fuck about modesty in there. I guess if I wanted to protect my precious sensibilities I would have stayed outside to strap up their bodies out there. Although no one did anything inappropriate towards me like this guy did, but then again I didn't just sneak in there uninvited.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:19 AM
1

Wrong jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:41 AM
0

Reading this rambling post I don't know where to start! Most of it is nonsense, irrelevant and isn't anchored in the real world. As I was reading through this I was just thinking "My God, this is a real person!" Like honestly, man, holy fucking shit! And then you link to a bunch of law links. I don't know what you are trying to prove there, wrong jurisdiction and completely irrelevant. You just keep on trucking there, Sport.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:46 AM
1

So just because I don't like this treatment at work makes it ok to treat other women like that because "Oh gee, you never know, she may just like it!" I think you're missing the point. It's widely regarded in workplace policies that harassment of this type is not tolerated. It's been like that for a while now. There is zero requirement for the person that this is being directed to to tell you what you can and cannot do in regards to sexual harassment. That you don't agree with that view is compl…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:57 PM
1

Even when it elicits the same response? When we tell people we don't like being treated like that in the workplace and yet there are some men who still think it's ok and isn't a big deal, who do you think is right? It's one thing to say something to a person and not understand that it's insulting, but it's a completely different thing when they are told directly from the people they are doing it to to not do it and yet they still persist claiming "It's just a joke."
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:11 PM
1

"It's just a prank, bro!" doesn't change anything.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:28 PM
3

No, he was still at work, so was she. And he decided it was a good idea to make this awkward pass on national TV in the workplace. I think it's reasonable to say it was unprofessional and well below standard.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:47 AM
1

Hey, I was in a few relationships previously where the guy was over-domineering and I would reluctantly go along with it because I wanted to keep the peace and do as I'm told because it would make them happier. Believe me it doesn't work; I was miserable and felt it just eroding my self-worth. You guys need to talk before he wakes up one day all alone. This artificial sense of power he's trying to salve himself with won't do shit. I don't mean to butt into your private business, but I just had t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 03:53 AM
0

They seem very intent on us submitting to a man, don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 03:33 AM
5

What's so bad about this International Men's Day? I don't get it. Not being rhetorical or anything, I genuinely don't understand what evil this is supposed to bring.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 04:37 AM
1

Looks like there wasn't enough evidence and also conflicting evidence that prevented the other charges from sticking. A tragic accident.
/r/PussyPass08/11/15 08:13 AM
-1

I did answer it, you just refuse to look past your hysterics to see it. Look at the way you address me. Do you address other women like that? I think you're a very pathetic person and I feel sad for you. I sincerely hope you manage to let go of this anger and live a more healthier and happier existence, unless you want to keep being routinely dismissed as just another wretched creature that can't control themselves; Someone that doesn't have the balls to use their main account here and chooses i…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:32 AM
1

Well I'm sitting here doing my nails and just got your reply and my first reaction is go ask women out in the community what they think. Ask them what sort of ideals they have about equality, they're probably pretty close to the dictionary definition of feminism. Unless you live on campus, how many would be radicals? Hell, I bet you're probably similar in views to them. Those people you mention is all very true and they get treated in a disgusting way, but those radfems you talk about are a mino…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:08 AM
0

I don't hate you at all. I'm not going to argue with you here other than to say I think you're completely misguided. I can see you're very angry, but instead of attacking me and focusing on how academia has been hijacked by these radicals, go outside and go talk to normal women out in the community. Ask them what their views are, what they believe in and what they think is fair. That's what the majority face of feminism looks like. Most of those women would even deny that they're feminist, but o…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:13 AM
4

It's become factionalized and there is a lot of variation in it from what I see. In my afk life the organisations I'm involved in are active in the more dictionary definition brand of feminism and they're not paying lip service, they're very sincere about it. In university I more often run into more radicalised feminism that I think are having a real problem reconciling their views with actual equality. Online I sometimes get ridiculed outside of women orientated areas because I get associated w…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:03 PM
4

I don't think we've gotten to the point of completely equal rights at all, whether in the legal system or in society. It's really good now compared to our past, but it's not complete. In some ways in the legal system women are favoured more than men, that's not equal and it needs to be fixed. The background I had growing up women were treated as secondary to men. It's ingrained and leads to so much abuse and unfortunately I got a lot of that too. I've been beaten badly by men, sexually and menta…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:30 PM
4

I found it really upsetting what happened with him. I can be a little bit over empathetic and when I saw this guy that was supposed to be having the greatest moment of his life achieving so much and to have him torn down and humiliated instead, I just burst into tears I felt so bad for him. They weren't demanding equality, they were demanding superiority.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:14 PM
4

Well it mostly all falls under egalitarian values, doesn't it? Feminism as I was taught it is demanding equal rights for women, but not superior rights. I'm involved in the trade union movement and it's very egalitarian as well. I'm not a feminism expert, it's just my personal views.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:04 PM
12

I think the rise of this latest brand of feminism is going to swing the other way eventually and come back to a more moderate center. Feminism got a lot of momentum over the last few decades and I personally think that inertia carried through to what we see now. Third wave started off ok looking at wider issues and what not the spirit was there, but I don't know what the fuck happened after that. I've always been a supporter of conventional feminism, the idea that we're all equal and there shoul…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:47 AM
31

I'm a feminist and I thought she gave an excellent answer. I also loved the answer to income inequality several months ago. She's someone I admire very much and is an awesome rolemodel for young girls (For anyone really). I like how she doesn't generalise and distil everyone into a singular identity. Much like feminism isn't all about whatever those blue-haired monstrosities marauding around Universities right now represent, or that all men involved in men's rights are not all misogynists who ca…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 06:24 AM
1

/r/worldnews does get pretty bad sometimes, the moderators don't seem to be interested in cleaning it up at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 08:59 AM
-3

Why you keep speaking for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 06:27 AM
2

And yet here he is losing his temper and there you are speaking on his behalf.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 03:58 AM
2

You're losing frame, try and stay on point. Also those race focused hate subs normally have small populations, yet TRP has become sizable. That's a whole load of industrial strength bigotry right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 03:50 AM
3

Ever thought he was trolling you and the sub? Nothing like a good little bit of mental masterbation to bait everyone into a good bit of self-gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 03:16 PM
1

'Tis ain't no thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:37 PM
4

Well it is more fun than having to put up with the sermonising. You aren't asking a question in the normal sense, you're just waiting for the opportunity to sermonise whatever self-serving moral code you subscribe to to make you feel squared away with distancing yourself from any concept of being altruistic to strangers. This shit sticks out like dogs balls. People are going to pipe up with what they think and you are going to jump down them oozing moral correctness and neutralise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:28 PM
1

I dunno, I don't think it would so constructive to dismiss someone that is clearly qualified in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:20 PM
3

I can't wait until you edit your comment to remove the ALL CAPS and fix your spelling mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:02 PM
3

I too CAN talk LIKE William SHATNER. I have a BA in comparative religion studies with a philosophy minor and a law degree, so speak for yourself about who is qualified to discuss what Followed BY academic credentials mean NOTHING to me. WHAT are you SAYING? YOU are using a lot of REALLY big and SCARY words. I am SUSPECTING you are just trying to SWING your BRAIN DICK around by asking a question that SCIENCE is only JUST starting to GRASP. /THE SHATS
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 01:58 PM
3

And where THEIR moralities come from is explored by this man who is a lot more qualified than you and I to explain. This is an ageless question and expecting the answer that will satisfy you (It won't) about something that is still not fully understood, even though it is innate in us all, is silly. People can talk about things that influence us, but I think it would be rare to find someone that actually understands where our morality comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 01:32 PM
0

Maybe /r/philosophy might be of some help to you? Also I highly recommend Sam Harris) to read. He's a neuroscientist and philosopher and endlessly explores morality and where it comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 01:15 PM
-1

A high partner count negatively affects a woman's ability to pair bond with her husband and children. Where did you hear that nonsense from?
/r/askTRP21/06/14 04:52 AM
-4

Why would that make her a slut? Perhaps she kept it from you because she could she how immature you were about such things.
/r/askTRP21/06/14 04:09 AM
-3

Why is it any of your business how many partners she has had before she even met you?
/r/askTRP21/06/14 03:40 AM
19

Go look at any medical article dealing with incontinence and childbirth, there's a lot of information out there. But you're not going to do that, are you? Because you think you know better than the medical community and all the numerous women that have to deal with that.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 03:56 AM
18

Unborn babies push down on the bladder, urethra, and pelvic muscles.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 03:47 AM
20

I went and looked it up for you. Enjoy the read. Kegels
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:26 PM
28

You're going to try and draw parallels with child birth and penis's are you?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:23 PM
39

To help with urinary problems after childbirth.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:19 PM
40

You have no idea about vaginas.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:16 PM
4

Sush you, only pseudoscience here, thank you very much.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:12 PM
2

Haha, my name is because of my dog which is nicknamed Piglet. She sometimes takes off to play with the neighbours kids and I have to become the great Piggles Hunter to go find her. Being condescending is a common method of engagement in this sub I find.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:59 PM
2

It looks like a disconnect with reality and an inability to relate to girls as another human. It's like they have this pressing need to exert control and dominance of the situation and women have to be shoehorned into a particular role to achieve that, regardless of the fact that people just don't work like that. And then you get the inevitable frustration when they observe people's behaviours don't typically match their ideal. Me personally, I like a strong masculine man, but he has to be able …
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:53 PM
8

I think you guys emasculate yourselves.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:59 AM
4

/r/shitredditsays I don't really know how to explain it. It's confronting and unusual to say the least.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:42 AM
7

I think she knows more about her own sexuality than you could do.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:37 AM
1

I don't think Zion is all that correct myself. To me the desirability of a guy goes way down if he sleeps around a lot, for sex or for a bf. They just seem so cheap to me and whenever I've talked about this to my friends they tend to have the same view. It's not that I think a guy that really enjoys sex is a bad thing, quite the opposite, it's just I want something more than a communal dildo.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:36 AM
5

Well, it's a good thing then that that prediction wasn't accurate.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter