TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PilotTheCannibal Archive

View 1 post and 52 comments by PilotTheCannibal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What the fuck? She told him she didn't want to have sex and then he proceeded to have sex with her. I don't think there's anything wrong with the guy making a move in this situation, but if she clearly states that she doesn't want to have sex, the guy is legally required not to force her to have sex with him. I've spent time alone with plenty of male friends and none of them have tried to fuck me, and on the few occasions when they did, they respected me when I said "no, I don't want to have sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 09:25 PM
2

Finally this actually makes sense to me, thank you for explaining it in simple terms (don't necessarily agree, but now I understand the concept).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:44 PM
1

Mathematically, this doesn't seem to make sense to me unless we are assuming that there is a significant portion of women who are choosing not to enter into the dating pool? This would only make sense if there were a surplus of men and not enough women (like in China, for example). Wouldn't the 8 or 9 guys theoretically go for the 8 or 9 girls, even if the 7 girl pursues them, therefore forcing the 7 girl to go with 7 guys? I mean, I think the whole idea of a number rating on appearance is a bit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:41 PM
2

What is your evidence for the fact that women don't love men the way men love women? Anecdotal evidence about a few women who claimed to be "more rational" doesn't quite cut it. Most people view themselves as rational, and besides, I thought the red pill viewed women as less rational than men, so this seems to be an internal contradiction in the "red pill" philosophy. I think both men and women have the capacity to be irrational about love. What about all the women who stay in abusive relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:37 PM
1

I can see what you're saying, and I agree that compatibility and enjoying the person's company is probably the MOST important thing in a relationship. And I can also see what you're saying about how much free time the person would potentially have - it sucks if your partner is always working,m. However, I still think that someone's chosen career can tell you something about who they are as a person. I would also like to clarify that I was mostly referring to using this information in the moments…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:01 PM
2

Yes, I wasn't trying to imply that you claimed it was bad - I was remarking on the general attitude that people seem to have towards "hypergamy," taking it to mean that women are shallow and don't like men for proper reasons. I thought your explanation was good and I was more agreeing with you than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 09:57 PM
1

Think about it in a non-romantic sense: imagine if you looked up to somebody and wanted to be their friend. How do you make a friend? Do you follow them around all day complimenting them? No. That would be weird as fuck, and probably make them uncomfortable. In fact, there's a word for that type of person: kiss-ass. There's nothing wrong with a few compliments, but if you overdo it, you can come across as insincere. Some men act like women are compliment machines, and if they just keep inserting…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 07:38 PM
7

I'm a woman, and I find it strange that men don't feel this way too - why not find somebody attractive for their skills or profession? If dating someone because you admire them is "hypergamy," then why is "hypergamy" so often used in a negative sense? Let me clarify that this is not necessarily related to money or status - but I will be more attracted to someone if I admire what they do for a living. For example, the average doctor would probably be more attractive to me than the average plumber…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 07:19 PM
1

She's calling them assholes because she's angry with them for not wanting to be in a serious relationship with her. She's just generally angry at these men in her post. I doubt she considered them "assholes" when they first began dating
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 07:15 PM
1

Because a lot of these self-described "nice guys" are not actually nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 07:13 PM
2

Hey, I never claimed women were lonely. They just want to stay away from men like you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 12:06 AM
3

There is clearly no point in arguing with you. You claim my studies are biased, but you haven't backed up anything you've said with any research at all - only your own opinions and emotions. You also constantly dismiss every disadvantage I've listed as "minuscule" without giving anything but your own opinion to back up this claim. I could also claim that your dating problems are "minuscule" because the majority of men are able to successfully date women - but I haven't done that. I respected you…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 09:15 PM
2

There is no need to be angry and defensive. I'm just trying to have a discussion with you, and I don't think you've fully understood my argument. I never claimed that women have a harder time finding a date. In fact, I think women have a much easier time finding at date. Instead, I argued that the RISKS of dating are much higher for women than they are for men - because of this, women do not have an easier experience with dating. That was my argument. You claimed that domestic violence has nothi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 07:53 PM
2

I think it is because friendship is highly valued in our society whereas sex without intimacy is seen in a much more negative light. Friendship is associated with loyalty and companionships, whereas casual sex is associated with shallowness, poor self-control, and animalism. You can disagree with this all you want, but there it is. I don't think it is as "gendered" as you think. Women who just want casual sex without intimacy are generally looked upon in an even more negative light - they are se…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:18 PM
3

Just because it is easier for young women to have sex if they want to doesn't mean that they have everything easier. Women generally have much lower sex drives than men (because they have less testosterone) and most women don't WANT to have sex constantly with a bunch of different people - so this isn't much of an advantage. Also, it's kind of ridiculous to claim that women have it easier in dating when women are five times more likely than men to be physically harmed or assaulted by their partn…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 05:42 PM
2

How is that being selfish? Both men and women become more cynical as they age....they also come to understand themselves and the world better. There's nothing "selfish" about this. You want women to stay exactly at the mental state they were when they were 21?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 09:12 PM
3

A lot of the same disadvantages that come with being a young man - struggling to support yourself financially and struggling to establish yourself within a career and community that you find satisfying and worthwhile. They might also be dealing with the stress of dating and trying to find the right person to spend their life with. In the US, life satisfaction actually tends to increase after age 50 for both men and women at a similar rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 09:08 PM
1

Honestly, the whole "wall" thing is mostly just something made up by the type of men who feel like women have everything handed to them in their 20s and then think these magical privileges disappear once we hit a magical "wall." They also assume that women only care about their physical attractiveness because that's all they care about. Of course most women get attractive as they age. So do most men. But there is no magical "wall" when you wake up one day and realize that you're ugly and your li…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 08:56 PM
1

Yeah, maybe women can't understand - I think about sex a lot, but not as much as you describe (I've heard many other men say they feel this way too). That must be frustrating. As for what you said about being able to "walking into the room and command the attention of other people..." it's funny, because I always thought men were better at commanding attention, and was a bit jealous of them for it. I'm sure there are some extremely gorgeous women who "command attention" just by walking in...but …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 06:55 PM
1

A lot of people who spend all their time partying and drinking are secretly very lonely and unhappy. A lot of people do "fun" things (like, for example, drinking or doing drugs) to try to distract themselves from their inner sadness or bad things that are happening in their lives. A coke addict is probably not a very happy person, but snorting coke sure is fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 02:38 AM
1

Yes, I agree - it's certainly not a criticism of men, because that's how their biology is designed - but I know there's been plenty of times when I've tried to convince my boyfriend to have sex with me again (cause we had sex very briefly) and he'll say nah, he's too tired - then the next morning he wants to have sex for 5 minutes again. I think what a lot of guys don't understand is that sex for women is usually slightly painful at the beginning, during the first 2-3 minutes (particularly if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 02:30 AM
1

Oh, I see - so you're saying that whoever wants sex more in a relationship has less power, because the other person has the ability to give or withdraw sex? I understand what you are saying in terms of having/not having sex, because a lot of guys will sleep with anyone and women tend to be much more selective - however, once you're in a relationship (at least in my experience) I think the "power" is somewhat equal....a lot of the guys I've dated wanted (in general) to have sex for like 10 minute…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 02:14 AM
3

The way you talk about women - it is as if you think they have some sort of power over you....because you want to have sex with them? Maybe I can't understand because I'm not a man. If so many men feel this way, there must be some truth to it. But I just don't understand...for example, if I want to have sex with a guy, but he isn't into me, that doesn't necessarily give him "power" over me....it just makes me a bit sad. I'm not trying to criticize what you're saying, I'm honestly just trying to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:41 PM
2

You're thinking about the type of women who are extremely extroverted and usually gorgeous and enjoy dancing, clubbing, going to bars, etc. I don't think there is anything wrong with this, but this is not the majority of women. The majority of women get home from class or work and study/hang out/take their dog for a walk/have a friend or two over for dinner. You don't see them because they are at home. Besides, I think "fun" is a pretty subjective term....I have fun at home by myself listening t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:29 PM
2

She specifically said "some people in the manosphere...." If she had said, "why do men always generalize women?" that would have been ironic. But she did not say that. She said that SOME people in a specific group tend to speak about women in a general way. There is no irony here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:21 PM
3

Saying that the male role "is respected more" because the male traits "require more hard work and competition" implies that you believe it is correct to assign higher value to the male traits, as opposed to the female traits, which, based on your statement, require less hard work and less competition than the male traits - assigning more value to the male traits and less value to the female traits implies that you believe the male role to be superior. Your statement is a non-sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:16 PM
1

Ah! So I did - my bad :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 03:05 AM
1

Yes! You have explained this so well. You see this in almost every single fringe moment, both in the red pill and very radical feminism. It's like talking to a conspiracy theorist (in a way, these people are all conspiracy theorists). They cherry pick the worst possible examples from the opposing side and use these individual examples to validate their viewpoint. They also constantly feel like their viewpoint is being threatened and will do anything to defend it, making them impossible to reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 02:50 AM
2

That's not true - you can still be attracted to certain people even if you haven't had the chance to date anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 02:34 AM
3

It's not unhealthy - 19.4 is okay. But I totally agree that going any further under 120 pounds (115, 110) at 5'6 would be extremely unhealthy. I don't think this guy realizes how much women actually weigh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 05:39 PM
3

If she were 6 pounds lighter or two inches taller she would be underweight. I don't think you're being mean on purpose, I think you have a skewed perception of how much people actually weigh (many women in real life tend to shave a few pounds off their weight, like men add a few inches to their height, so maybe this is the reason for your misconception of how much women actually weigh). She has a bmi of 19.5, which is actually about as healthy as you can get (very fit, but not underweight, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 05:37 PM
11

Yeah, some men seem to have no idea how much women actually weigh. According to the bmi scale, 5'3 at 110 pounds is very skinny (19.5), almost underweight, although still healthy (healthy bmi is between 18.5-24.9). In fact, if you were 6 pounds lighter, or two inches taller, you would be underweight. Guys like this are the reason people develop anorexia and shit. To give the men the benefit of the doubt, I know some women tend to shave about 10 pounds off their weight when they tell people in re…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 05:30 PM
2

Most women get breast reduction surgery because their breasts are causing them pain, not to be less attractive to men. I've considered breast reduction surgery, because I have a small frame (4'10) and a relatively normal weight (105 pounds) but my breasts are very large in proportion to my frame. I have constant back pain and I'm only 22. I enjoy running, but after even a light jog I have severe back pain as well, and my breasts are always very sore. My aunt has the same body type as me and she …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 05:21 PM
1

Yes. But context matters too. He might have a good reason for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 01:49 PM
3

I'd probably go for the 5'6 guy just based on this information because the inability to hold down a job is a red flag for anyone, no matter how tall you are. I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "alpha male" but it is true that most women want somebody who is confident, successful, and passionate about whatever they do. So the 5'6 would definitely come out ahead just based on this information. They're both way taller than me anyways though so the height wasn't really a big factor for me
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 01:39 PM
2

This is actually true. Statistically, men are more likely to use violent methods to kill themselves (gunshots, jumping off a building, etc.) and women are more likely to OD or slit their wrists. Women actually have twice as many suicide ATTEMPTS as men (although some of these attempts could be considered "cries for help" instead of actual attempts, which makes the problem a bit murkier.) Still, it's a lot easier to save someone who's slit their wrists than someone who's shot themselves in the he…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:29 PM
3

I think a lot of people hate men's rights because they don't know too much about it. In the media "Men's Rights" is depicted as something much closer to the stuff that goes on the "The Red Pill" subreddit (read that recent Cracked article about Men's Rights if you think I'm wrong.)
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:11 AM
1

I see
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:06 PM
3

The very thought that any guy would want to date a woman who acts like this is annoying to me. It's like we can't be expected to act like normal, rational adults, and guys need to learn to put up with that. If that isn't sexist, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:57 PM
–

That's interesting. So are some feminists against forcing men to pay child support, for example, or against favoring women for custody of the children in a divorce?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:56 PM
2

This tvtropes page has a ton of good examples of this in tv, movies, books, etc. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardRapefemaleOnMale
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:49 PM
–

Thanks, take however much time you need. I know the basics of feminism, basically what my friends have told me, I know about the different types (liberal, radical, socialist, eco-feminism, etc) but it's hard to get unbiased information, and I haven't seen too much evidence of feminists supporting men's rights or general equality between the two genders...it seems they're more focused on empowerment for women, which is fine, but not quite enough all by itself. I'm certainly no expert though and I…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:45 PM
–

Thanks for the reply, sorry you're getting downvoted. If you have any interesting feminist articles I'd definitely be interested in reading them to get a different perspective.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:48 PM
4

Yes. This is similar to what I was trying to say, but conveyed more concisely, I think.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:51 AM
–

I see your point. But would it be safe for me to assume that you agree with the core values of feminism (ie, men and women should be treated equally) but you hate what feminism has become? If so, then I agree with you on that point. I think it's kind of sad (and, at the same time, incredibly ironic) that feminism has become so sexist. I don't think my friends are even that prejudiced against men; I honestly think they're just being a bit stupid, (which is odd, because they're ordinarily pretty s…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:42 AM
–

I can see this in a lot of my friends, who've learned their feminist views at college. I don't know why, but it seems like a lot of the professors (especially, but not exclusively, older female professors) present feminism as an "us against them" type of psychology, and refuse to focus on any prejudice that might exist against males. Maybe it's because they were raised during a time period where there actually was a lot of gender inequality, so they feel like they've got to fight to hold onto th…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:20 AM
12

Exactly. I think it is important to have a leadership program, but it should be available for anyone who wants to learn leadership skills, not just women. And I totally agree about the problem with male suicide rates. Females are actually more likely to be depressed than males, but males are more likely to commit suicide, because depression in males is seen as a "weakness," whereas it's not as stigmatized for females, so men don't have access to the same resources as females. At my university, w…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:04 AM
–

Definitely. All women are different, of course, but I've never seen this stereotype manifest in reality. Women are plenty competitive. For example, me. And tons of other women I've known. Men are competitive, too, but I've seen no evidence that they're more competitive than women.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:58 AM
–

That is a fair point. I suppose feminism was supposed to address all gender issues, since they claim to want equality between the two genders, but even the most ardent supporters of feminism can't argue that feminists address both male and female issues equally. They just don't. That's why I thought it would be better to have a gender neutral group, that could distance itself from feminism, and therefore could focus less on how men have victimized women (or vice versa) and more on how to fix gen…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:28 AM
–

I think one of the problems with feminism is when it comes from a place of fear: ie, if you don't "stand up" for your rights as a woman then those "evil" men will bring back the "patriarchy" and take away your power. My "feminist" friends, that I described earlier, are a part of this program at my university called the "Woman's Leadership Program," which sounds alright, but is actually horrible. For example, one of the things they're studying is how females are "pushed out" of banking jobs, and …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:54 AM
2

I mean, I think both women and men are guilty of it. I think we should focus less on trying to blame one group or the other, and more on trying to change our societal attitude towards "slut-shaming." Perhaps we could start by not calling people "sluts."
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:11 AM
2

Interestingly, women are 3x more likely to attempt suicide than men, but men are much more likely to successfully complete suicide, because they are more likely to use more violent methods. The psychiatric community actually has been focusing a lot on male suicide prevention, because it is statistically much more difficult to predict and prevent male suicide than female suicide (because males, in general, show less warning signs than females.) They've been trying to set up certain deterrence tec…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter