TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PirateNixon Archive

View 2 posts and 53 comments by PirateNixon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

This girl is being charged because she provided a statement that there is proof is false (or the DA thinks so). This is not always the most unbiased subreddit there is. This girl is accused of this crime, and deserves the same due process and presumption of innocence that those she accused do. Knowing nothing about your specific circumstances, I cannot say that everyone will believe you. What I can say is that I would hope that you can go to authorities and tell the truth without repercussions. …
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:46 PM
5

Yes, I loved the fall back on "She's white so she couldn't understand this thing I'm going through that relates to my race in no way at all."
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:52 AM
1

If a black male did that in America, best case scenario he gets tazered. Without the media there I'd expect a decent chance he'd be shot.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/16 01:11 PM
13

Lots of people agree with you. Unfortunately, that is not a popular opinion so it is not enacted into law.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/15 01:10 PM
40

It's based on the income and net worth of the patent paying. That's why shitty people try to make babies with sports stars.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/15 12:51 PM
2

LIAR!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/15 02:23 PM
19

If I were the judge, I'd change the custody ruling right there. That woman is not stable enough to parent.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/15 03:21 PM
16

Call your website MeForWe. No gender descriptors.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:30 PM
-6

Yell about it in the interwebs
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:09 PM
15

That assumes a monogamous relationship where the provider is covering the whole family. In non-family plans, the incentive to prevent pregnancy is reduced if you are only covering the male as a pregnancy has no additional medical costs directly associated with it for the father. In a family plan, you are still relying on a faithful female partner to save anything. All that said, it's still bullshit, but from the perspective of a financially driven heartless company, it makes sense. Edit: I forgo…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:35 PM
2

Fair enough
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:49 PM
6

I wasn't asking the question, I was trying to point out that the question is being asked by the media. Granted it's an outlier from the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:47 PM
1

Well, I'd say that a 60/40 split would qualify as an overwhelming majority in many contexts, as that means you're looking at a 3:2 ratio. Meaning you'd need a half again increase in the lower rate to make an even rate. If a politician is leading by more than 8%, it's called a landslide victory. You're talking about a 20% difference. Again, all that being said, I agree with the point that male victims are marginalized, I just don't support taking the feminist route of arguing all messages that do…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:29 PM
0

While I agree with your sentiment, by your own numbers, the statement IS correct... 60% is a majority.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:14 PM
2

And this assumes you are located in a country that's willing to allow extradition of it's citizens because they posted something inflammatory that another nation has deemed illegal. As it should be. If something I did isn't illegal in my nation, and it is in yours, but our nations are not working together on this, then I shouldn't be accessible to your law enforcement. How many times have redditors mocked North Korea? That's a crime in NK, but not where we live. I don't want NK to be able to ext…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:45 PM
1

You're not anonymous on the internet... you're identity isn't made public by default, and if you're skilled you can obviscate who you are, but you are not anonymous. And if you break the law in a different country, that's up to international relations.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:27 PM
3

As long as you are not breaking the law... then go ahead. I don't see the issue.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:18 PM
2

I'd be more likely to blame the polarization of the political spectrum. If we had a system that allowed us to represent people as something other than "liberal", "conservative", or rarely "moderate", then we could see that a majority of people would not support these beliefs. For example, I support abortion rights, but also gun rights. I am an atheist, but I support the rights of these preachers to preach on public grounds. Each of those are "contrary opinions" in the diametrically opposed polit…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:05 PM
2

I was mocking the behavior/law. From what I've read, gender equality is a stated goal of feminism. From what I've seen enacted in the world, that equality is only sought out when it is perceived as beneficial to the female gender.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:24 PM
5

Gender roles are not a bad thing if they are advantageous in that specific circumstance. Women make their own decisions, unless they regret them, then it's a men's fault.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:31 PM
3

This is a big one to do BEFORE any other action. Once divorce proceedings start, she can fight him on this. While they are "happily married" he can take the kids to the doctor if he wants to legally.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:48 PM
7

I get that they are trying to garner information. The issue I have is with the lawsuit which is based on the premise that men are liable for the repercussions of the women they associate with.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:37 PM
32

According to the story: Lawsuit claims fellow Indiana University students failed to care for an intoxicated Lauren Spierer. So it's the men with the college girl's responsibility to take care of her if she drinks too much? I get that you should take care of others as a decent human being, but I'll be damned if I think you're liable for simply being male and failing to care for an intoxicated female in your presence.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:11 PM
4

He wasn't locked up, but he sees his daughter messed because of it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 04:34 PM
28

Even if the putative father opts out, it should still be done. What if it isn't his? Doesn't the ACTUAL father deserve the right to know?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:55 PM
2

Would you not have said you were on good terms when she pulled the goalie and got pregnant to begin with?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:36 PM
3

Sounds like OP is pretending to be with her so she'll get it aborted so he can make a clean break without her trying to use the child as leverage.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:34 PM
3

It's the same in the US effectively. "Forced penetration" is required by the offender. So if a woman forces a man to have sex with her by any means, it's not rape its sexual assault because the victim was "forced to penetrate" instead of be penetrated.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:54 PM
7

Are you in the US? cause if you are, then the draft exists, it just isn't active. In the same way volcanoes exist when not erupting.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:44 PM
12

I would have just replied with "I think it is a sad comment about you and your family that #1 that's your daughter's conclusion, and #2 you encouraged her having that opinion of fathers."
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:34 PM
18

That seems like a very weak argument at best. Trojan doesn't require you bring a woman in to buy it with you and have her read the disclaimer that condoms are not 100%. Gynecologists don't require women to bring their husbands int o explain that birth control pills are not 100%. A woman can get her tubes tied without telling her husband, and that isn't 100%.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:57 PM
-1

I do not have those numbers, but I do have a source to say that a large number of male victim rapes occur in prisons, where more than a little physical force is used. Also, according to this source, the United states is the first nation in history to report more instances of male victim rape than female.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:37 PM
1

My point was simply to demonstrate a situation when people commonly use that phrase. Not trying to say I agree with it.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:24 PM
3

I'm not trying to be confrontational here, but what do you mean by "would you equate male and female rate equally"? If you mean numerically, the numbers here (Source PDF, see page 18-19) show their rate of occurrence is approximately equal. If you mean to compare which type of sexual assault is worse, male victim rape vs female victim rape, I'd say that the idea that the gender of a victim in a rape case adjusts the severity of the crime makes me a truly sad. Rape is rape. Apart from the basic p…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:53 PM
4

So you're saying real women don't hit...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:10 PM
8

Girl hits guy Guy hits back Girl: "You shouldn't hit a woman!" Guy: "You hit me first!" Girl: "Real men don't hit women."
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:47 PM
2

Yea! You should be paid the same for working fewer hours in a job that requires more common and fewer skill sets! (Statistically speaking) Edit: Edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:10 PM
10

I think the real takeaway from that is that rather than assert that women are being short changed on their pay, they should pay attention to what they believe the source is... If girls and young women are picking lower paying careers, then spend your time trying to fix that instead of talking about how women get paid less because they are women. Women are not being paid less because they are women, people are being paid less because they are picking lower paying careers.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:12 PM
2

Depends where you are, in some states, once you've been attacked you can defend yourself by whatever means you see fit. Unless the attacker is fleeing or clearly unable to continue attacking you, you are free to use a firearm to defend yourself if you feel the need.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:05 PM
2

MRS degree... as in a degree you'd get when you expect to be Mrs. Whoever because you don't have to be the bread winner...
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:23 PM
2

It's not that it isn't a real degree, but you'd be deluding yourself if you claimed it was equal (for compensation purposes) to a technical degree. The point he was trying to make, I believe, was that large numbers of women go to college and get these type of degrees and then expect their male partners to provide for them because their partners got technical degrees with more earning potential.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:20 PM
8

I must have missed the part where we started factoring in someones previous criminal convictions before we judge people for murdering them in cold blood.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:28 PM
2

Welp I'm banned from that subreddit now.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:50 PM
13

My intention was not to censor DavidByron, it was to point out how hypocritical his statement was.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:31 PM
84

It's that special kind of feminism that some feminists are. If you don't like it when men's rights groups get generalized, don't generalize back.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:38 PM
1

Varies by state. In many states you have to refer to yourselves as married before you are married under common law.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:19 PM
1

My family friend advised me that if I am going to do that, I better be drunk too. My family friend knew better than to tell a guy that age to not sleep with people since I obviously wouldn't have listened. He isn't my lawyer, just a lawyer.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:40 PM
1

I actually received this advice from a family friend that is a lawyer, but like I said in response to another post, I'm married so this advice does not apply to my actions any more.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:12 AM
1

I was a confused young man. I'm sorry! I didn't fully grasp the eccentricities of how alcohol was so very very bad... until the legal age, at which point it is very very good.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:57 PM
1

I grew up in the US. I did in fact drink alcohol underage, a fact which is documented in legal record as I was issued a citation for underage drinking. I KNOW I'M A HORRIBLE PEOPLE!
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:34 PM
0

I've always been in a relationship with the women I've been intimate with. Of course, I got married at 21, so my time to drink and hook up randomly was very small.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:14 PM
5

Ever since having consensual sex with someone who is intoxicated could be ruled as rape after the fact, I've been taught two things: Never have sex with someone who is intoxicated unless I am intoxicated as well. File a report that I've been raped without pressing charges (only viable in some jurisdictions) as soon as possible after the fact. This will establish a legal record of me as the victim, making it significantly more challenging for the other party to claim they were the victim.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:09 PM
15

They should also remove people of Arab decent and Muslims from flights with unaccompanied minors if we are just going to start basing our policies solely off the fears of poorly informed house wives. Seriously? I have to move because I'm male... seriously? In what illogical vision of reality is that NOT discrimination?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter