TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pirateangel113 Archive

View 11 posts and 149 comments by Pirateangel113 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They didn't though...
/r/BlackPillScience23/11/24 04:22 AM
0

Because "Male Feminists" are so uncomfortable and ashamed of their own sexuality, they basically try to walk on eggshells around women, to the point of putting them up on a pedestal. They hide their motivations and true intentions because they deliberately do everything in their power to avoid "creeping" women out. If is as if they believe that sexuality somehow objectifies and dehumanises women, therefore they have to stamp out this part of themselves. This is why they are so unattractive to wo…
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/23 04:54 PM
2

Can you support women's rights without trying to get browny points for a sexual relationship? Yes... I feel bad for people that think this would be a good sexual strategy though. Also why are they saying male feminists are less masculine? Seems like a bad logical connection
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/23 02:17 PM
2

At a certain point the huge amount of wealth differences between Chris Hemsworth and Jeff Bezos doesn't really make a difference because both of them are far far beyond the average wealth of a regular person. Both of these people can provide more than the women could even dream.
/r/BlackPillScience10/11/23 08:33 PM
2

" Strategic pluralism (also known as the dual-mating strategy) is a theory in evolutionary psychology regarding human mating strategies that suggests women have evolved to evaluate men in two categories: whether they are reliable long term providers, and whether they contain high quality genes.[1] The theory of strategic pluralism was proposed by Steven Gangestad and Jeffry Simpson, two professors of psychology at the University of New Mexico and Texas A&M University, respectively." Why both of …
/r/BlackPillScience10/11/23 01:58 AM
1

No one's saying all men look the same. Nice strawman I am not saying that either wtf? significantly more attracted to wealthy, [!]high-status[!] men They aren't more physically attracted to wealthy, High status men. They are obviously attracted to their resources and thus greatly influenced by that. It doesn't say they are more sexually attracted to the wealthier men any where in the study instead it says they are 1,000 times more sensitive to wealth. Meaning they are more likely to choose the w…
/r/BlackPillScience10/11/23 12:25 AM
4

If a girl had to choose between Jeff Bezos and Chris Hemsworth and they could only choose one they would choose the more attractive less wealthy one Chris Hemsworth. If you think other wise you are just coping hard.
/r/BlackPillScience09/11/23 08:50 PM
13

as a rebuttal if they were given a choice they would prefer the first category.
/r/BlackPillScience09/11/23 08:28 PM
32

physical attraction =\= attraction. As anecdotal evidence my sister and all of her friends have said they would never ever date Jeff Bezos. Also I would like to point out that physically attractiveness + high status + wealth > Very High status + super wealthy This is why you would find posters of Justin Timberlake, Justin Bieber, and Shawn Mendez in a girls bedroom vs pictures of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg. The latter group is far more wealthier and have far higher st…
/r/BlackPillScience09/11/23 08:25 PM
1

I am very glad I could be of some service to you and others and thank you for the complement. it made my day!
/r/BlackPillScience20/10/21 09:18 AM
3

Which version of the blackpill? The one that espouses near godlike powers of handsome men or the one that says physical attractiveness is a good, substantial leg up? come on man I think you and i have debated enough to where you know where I stand on that but if you are seriously unsure I will reiterate that its the latter not the former in regards to where I stand. he study just says that women in the less attractive condition had more instances of mutually gazing at the confederate. So I'm not…
/r/BlackPillScience13/10/21 04:37 AM
5

the full study here We explained the sex differences in gazing at physically attractive targets by linking them to sex differentiated attraction communication. We want to emphasize that we did not directly test mating strategies, but taken together, the pattern of results fits nicely with the suggestion that men engage in overt, proactive, mating strategies while women engage in more covert, cautious strategies. With regard to the male mating strategy, this would mean that male ancestors who acte…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 06:03 PM
2

Ok now we're in the realm of anecdote but from my experience, another thing black pillers underestimate is that looks themselves create expectations. Like if you fail to live up to whatever archetype is in her mind, you will also fail. And there's a variance aspect that is also underestimated. they are probably underestimated because they haven't been studied to the extent that black pill has. To some extent I think what you are saying is true. The goal of science is to find out to what extent i…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 01:49 PM
3

I never said the blackpill needs to be thrown out. that is generally the vibe I get reading your titles when posting studies here. chill with the polarizing titles But blackpillers drastically underestimate behavior and the compensatory effect behavior can have. we are definitely in agreement here. There are a combination of factors that could potentially help or hurt you when attracting women for STRs(short term relationships). Black pill is a large factor. however it isn't the only factor like…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 10:44 AM
2

There are a lot of studies supporting what this study says...many of which are cited in this very study! studies that support attractiveness being a necessary condition > studies that do not support attractiveness being a necessary condition. this is why the authors framed the argument the way they did in the discussion section. It is far more likely to add nuance to the foundations in place(black pill) than to completely throw out all of it which I feel is the point of all your posts.
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 10:05 AM
7

most qualitative sciences have conflicting studies. You pointing out conflicting studies does not prove that one study is wrong vs another. There is a whole picture that is presented. This may be a piece of the puzzle that adds nuance. The writers of the study even leave a theory as to why this study conflicts with the majority of other studies that show attractiveness as a large factor. An explanation for the lack of effect of the characteristics that were hypothesized to be of importance is th…
/r/BlackPillScience12/10/21 08:29 AM
5

exactly this!
/r/BlackPillScience13/06/21 09:15 AM
4

you missed the most important part of the study. "For example, Meltzer, McNulty, Jackson, and Karney (2014b) found that for men, the physical attractiveness of their spouses significantly predicted their marital satisfaction over a 4-year period to a much greater extent compared with women. However, the authors themselves note that it is not clear whether physical attractiveness is always more important to men than women; it may be that physical attractiveness matters equally to men and women in…
/r/BlackPillScience13/06/21 09:13 AM
22

I think this is more of a cope than suifuel. "like just be a psychopath bro." I think it is also important to remember that women high in emotionality ( which is not a good trait) are the ones attracted to these men. NOT ALL WOMEN (or the general average women). for the foreseeable future Looks plays 60%-90% in mate success.
/r/BlackPillScience22/05/21 03:33 PM
4

Just realized this
/r/BlackPillScience05/04/21 01:08 PM
13

There has been a flood of blue pill/red pill studies in the last week or two that I think are meant to change sentiment in this sub. Think about it, if the average person on this sub thinks a lot of studies out there contradict black pill or disprove it then black pill would start to feel like it is incorrect. If you really start looking into the studies being presented however in the last few weeks things like this pop up.
/r/BlackPillScience04/04/21 01:45 PM
2

"I think women consciously rate what looks good but not necessarily what turns them on." Do you have evidence for this? or would you care to elaborate further? In general the evidence points to the opposite hypothesis in that what looks good is what turns women on. Source here https://www.academia.edu/410744/THE_INFLUENCE_OF_MALE_FACIAL_ATTRACTIVENESS_ON_WOMENS_RECEPTIVITY Second Source Here https://www.academia.edu/38205096/Attractiveness_and_sexual_behavior?email_work_card=title
/r/BlackPillScience27/02/21 07:29 PM
1

"Male physical strength was more strongly associated with changes in face shape that relate to perceived masculinity and dominance than to attractiveness. Our study adds to the growing evidence that attractiveness and dominance/masculinity may reflect different aspects of male mate quality." anesthetics are not the only part of male physical attractiveness male mate quality I would agree with this statement far more then the original mainly because it is more supported by the evidence as stated …
/r/BlackPillScience27/02/21 10:51 AM
10

I think FutanariDickCheese (lol) is right "Male physical strength was more strongly associated with changes in face shape that relate to perceived masculinity and dominance than to attractiveness." so this is saying the association is larger between strength and perceived dominance than it is with strength and attractiveness. I think the line is a bit confusing so it is possible I am misunderstanding it. so in short the author findings is that strength is perceived as more of a dominant trait th…
/r/BlackPillScience25/02/21 03:21 PM
1

oh ok I must of misinterpreted what you meant. I might of overly focused on the word ignored and thought that your argument was that scientists should not be ignoring the original study (based on female actions) and should not be favoring a prior study that was based on surveys (what females say) over the original. also forgive me if this does not make sense I just worked a double and haven't slept and my brain is like mush right now.
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/20 10:52 PM
0

gym max before facemax a buff 6'4 dude with an ugly face would probably do better then a skinny chad who is 5'6
/r/BlackPillScience05/12/20 06:24 PM
3

" Why does it matter what women rate as attractive (what they say) when they "ignore" that same trait when choosing a partner (what they do). " who said anything about ignoring their actions? we aren't completely discounting one study over another. remember in the paper they even say more research is needed to answer these complex questions. observing AND asking will help us get closer to the truth. In general the more data/evidence we have the more we can learn from it.
/r/BlackPillScience05/12/20 06:21 PM
50

" The relatively limited variation in sex partner number for men across much of the height continuum is difficult to explain. Research on other traits generally considered attractive to women has found that men with these traits have more sex partners (e.g., muscularity; Frederick & Haselton, 2007; Lassek & Gaulin, 2009). One possibility is that women may prefer relatively tall height, but other factors more strongly dictate sexual behavior. Research on the relative importance women place on hei…
/r/BlackPillScience02/12/20 07:18 PM
1

So was that a red flag before or after you read the study? If it was a red flag before I would find that interesting. As that would be a prevalent reason why women require a more up front investment from a more attractive male. Thank you! I appreciate your input.
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 10:23 PM
4

So you are saying if Chad pays 100% for the bill he is trying to pump and dump? According to the study above males will want to pay for the bill as a show of investment in courtship for more attractive women. For less attractive women they seek to split the bill. in general men seek out the most attractive female they can get for courtship (long term relationships). Generally males will pump and dump ugly women or women they do not find attractive enough for a relationship. From the evidence pre…
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 10:10 PM
1

even if we consider the quoted part on its merits alone, regardless of the results, it still doesn't make sense. So, you take previous data on hunter-gatherer communities, make the assumption that culture does not play a significant role, then investigate... what population? If the author is assuming that the dependent variable behaves completely identically in all populations, then what is he investigating? It can't be the truthfulness of this assumption - he has already taken it as true by exc…
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 08:00 PM
1

I sent an email to the research author about your criticism I am hoping he can clarify further on this issue. I am not a research scientist and I am not sure if I can fully address your criticism. Personally I do not think it is necessary to control for culture as in the back round it is stated that " There is sufficient evidence that human males share food in cooperative exchangerelationships in mating contexts. Men who can provision better are more likely to bechosen by women as mating partner…
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 04:37 PM
1

"In statistics, a confounder is a variable that influences both the dependent variable and independent variable, causing a spurious association." source- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding Culture is NOT going to affect either of the independent variables (attractiveness of the person dated OR self rated attractiveness) as evidenced in my first reply to your comment. Yes culture may affect the dependent variable as I had previously stated above and may increase the linear models accuracy …
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 09:37 AM
2

You can't examine the interaction of attractiveness (universal trait) with sentiment towards specific actions in a dating context (cultural trait) without controlling for the cultures involved. I could be wrong (got a B- in my data analysis class) or I could also be misinterpreting your argument(sorry if that is the case). However from my understanding of linear regression and this study they are not specifically looking at how a cultural trait (sentiment towards specific actions) interact with …
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 04:37 AM
6

They did not control for subjects' nationality. Seriously. I mean, fucking seriously. You're researching something that varies heavily by culture, and even by class within one culture, and you don't control for nationality and country of residence" It does not actually vary that much by culture. most cultures can agree on what is and is not attractive. Evidence https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/ " Being more or less attractive has important social consequences and people do ge…
/r/BlackPillScience18/06/20 03:13 AM
9

I was thinking the opposite before I read your comment (if Chad then pay for the date and feign a future courtship in order to get a short term fuck) then I realized that Chad doesn't even need to feign interest in a future relationship. He could just get sex by just being attractive. So I think you are 100% right. If you are Chad splitting the bill would be more adventageous as that would immediately signal that you are not willing to invest in a future courtship which would then lead her to pu…
/r/BlackPillScience16/06/20 12:16 PM
12

Tl;dr: Females prefer attractive males to pay (want attractive males to invest in their courtship). Males prefer to pay for attractive females (show a willingness to invest resources). self rated Attractive men prefer to split the bill more often then lower self rated men. "The current study demonstrates that market effects can affect payment preferences related to food provisioning during romantic dating. While the mode response from both sexes was a preference to split the bill, suggesting a c…
/r/BlackPillScience14/06/20 01:38 PM
2

Science tests things that may seem obvious. This is to ultimately verify said obvious thing. This sometimes yields results that are counter intuitive and leads to a greater understanding. One example of testing something that seemed obvious was Earth's shape. If you were to ask someone a few thousand years ago what the shape of the earth was I am sure they would say it was flat. As the earth looks flat. It would be obvious to them. Then the Greeks came along and tested that hypothesis and found …
/r/BlackPillScience09/06/20 02:53 PM
1

As if only looking at scientific research makes you autistic? the fact that human experience is extremely flawed is enough to keep me away from looking at guys with "experience". As it is inherently full of biases and subjected to emotion/opinion which is highly subjective. Research studies are about finding the truth. I will stick with the science thanks.
/r/BlackPillScience08/06/20 03:15 PM
1

I am blathering on about the OP study. As that is what I thought you were initially referring to when talking about mate preference of women with BPD(no mention of that in OP study) which is why I was curious about where you were getting your info from. Which I appreciate you linking sources.
/r/BlackPillScience08/06/20 12:15 PM
1

The abstract refers to male preference regarding women with BPD. saying that women with high attractiveness AND BPD can still get men for short term relationships. Neurotypical women are not as inclined to do the same. " Results show that women are more astute in mate preference, avoiding troublesome or financially challenged men who are time and economically costly, and men more readily engage in potentially turbulent relationships." The preferences of women with BPD is not mentioned in the abs…
/r/BlackPillScience08/06/20 12:43 AM
1

I don't think this is true at all. If a women has a man that she is genuinely attracted to she will not leave. Chad's have almost a super hold on women. I think the only time a women will leave a Chad is if there is something mentally disturbing about him. Even then a women will go through hundreds of hours of mental gymnastics to justify staying in the relationship.
/r/BlackPillScience07/06/20 11:55 PM
10

There is a huge misunderstanding with that study. Read it with an objective mind set. After that you could easily see that the findings show that men with the dark triad are deciving women by "acting" like the perfect man. Women do avoid men who display overt traits of psychopathy(which is confirmed by the above study). The problem that was presented in the dark triad study is that men who have such traits do not show overt signals of psychopathy and the goal was to figure out WHY such traits st…
/r/BlackPillScience07/06/20 12:46 PM
0

I think it is important to note that it decreased unattractiveness it doesn't increase attractiveness. So.. not really any hope.
/r/BlackPillScience05/06/20 04:53 PM
10

"Taller males had more short-term partners than shorter males (Table 5), and taller females also had more short-term partners than shorter females." "Attractive men and women were more successful in implementing their preferred mating strategies according to parental investment theory. Men with attractive faces and bodies enjoyed significantly more short-term mating success than their peers, with no cost in their long-term mating success, whereas women with attractive faces had more long-term ma…
/r/BlackPillScience04/06/20 09:48 PM
2

Building on what Bob said and to make it a little clearer. It will make you less ugly NOT more attractive.
/r/BlackPillScience01/06/20 12:58 PM
2

Thank you for posting. It is these kinds of articles that I find particularly interesting(and the reason why I subbed). I am extremely curious to find out what attributes are attractive and hope that we start to see more of these studies in the future.
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/20 09:54 PM
2

"Beauty is universal and objective. Only one kind of a face is a Chad face." You should reread my comment I never said that beauty isn't objective. It is objective I agree with you. However the types of attributes that are objectively attractive are still highly debated. "LOL you can't have a sharp jawline and a narrow face." Francisco Lachowski Alex from target. the kid who worked at target as a grocery bagger who went viral because young women all over the world thought he was "super hot". Obv…
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/20 09:38 PM
0

1) I don't have access to the full study. So a narrow face could have certain attributes that confirmes dimorphism principles. So they could have a narrow face but large zygotes and sharp jawline. 2) it is possible that the study is flawed. However discounting a study because it doesn't confirm prior knowledge about a subject is not scientific. Failing to verify previous results brings us closer to the truth. Einstein showed a failure within Newtonian physics when predicting how light travels. I…
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/20 09:17 PM
4

We are currently living at a point in time where women have far more choice in the dating world then men. Make an ugly girl profile on tinder see how many matches you get in an hour. Then do the same for an ugly man compare the amount of matches you get. Attractive women CAN get most of the things they want in a man by just opening up tinder. I agree that most women have an extremely warped sense of reality because of this and probably won't settle for less. Which is the problem. men want a porn…
/r/BlackPillScience20/05/20 08:03 AM
6

TL:dr no amount of money will make you more physically attractive. so to answer your question as simply as possible it will certainly help make you attractive in the relationship sense (as a provider) if you are average looking. I think it would certainly help your cause with finding a women to settle down with. EDIT: this is all dependent on your actual current level of physical attractiveness. if you are above average looking then that income level is enough to attract attractive females. if y…
/r/BlackPillScience17/05/20 05:56 AM
13

"In this study, we presented women with a variety of male faces and asked them whether they would consider these men for a one-nightstand, short-term relationship, or long-term relationship. We found that a group of the same men, the ones rated as the most attractive, were considered for all forms of relationships. Furthermore, more women were willing to consider these men for a short-term relationship than for a one-night stand or long-term relationship, which suggests that short-term relations…
/r/BlackPillScience13/05/20 07:06 AM
10

I know the feeling... Honestly i wish there was some kind of solution to this problem unfortunately I look like a teenager at the age of 30. Not in a good way... My hands are smaller then average. Voice isn't that deep (sound like a teenager). I have been called peanut head(as my head and face is smaller then average). The only thing i got average is my hight thank god. But that can only get me so far. Yeah sure i can get facial surgery to make my face masculine but nothing will magically make m…
/r/BlackPillScience13/05/20 01:56 AM
9

Your belief that you are ugly could be coming primarily from your own self image if you were able to bang a girl before 17. A majority of women have sex with guys they are attracted to. Although you could be an outlier i highly doubt it. It is far more likely that you think you are uglier then you actually are. The more probable scenario is that women find you more attractive then you think. Generally speaking people like you devalue the experiences of actually ugly people so they can put them d…
/r/BlackPillScience09/05/20 05:59 AM
1

K
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 11:28 AM
1

"Data data data i can make bricks without clay"
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 01:45 AM
1

GOOD BYE LEAVE ALREADY JESUS ANOTHER FUCKING POST ABOUT THE MODS
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 01:05 AM
1

OMG NOTIFY THE PRESSES CALL THE PRESIDENT!
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 01:01 AM
1

This post is really confirming my origional premis about how you guys don't contribute anything 7 people have commented on my post out of those 7 people 6 of them have only contributed insults.
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:59 AM
1

K
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:54 AM
1

K
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:51 AM
1

K
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:44 AM
1

K
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:39 AM
1

Ok what is the blackpill?
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:35 AM
1

Uhh either shit or get off the pot. Stupid fucking comments that have nothing to do with sub are filling its front page its fucking annoying nobody fucking cares about your stupid radicalized ideology.
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:32 AM
1

Hey I have been playing around with the idea as well check out my post on measuring profiles. https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:28 AM
1

Honestly bro its over for the Kidcels
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:05 AM
1

Lmao
/r/Chadfish24/06/19 12:02 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 11:38 PM
1

K
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 11:34 PM
1

You really need to see a pyscologist you are not well.
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 11:33 PM
1

"You see nothing wrong with being a cuck. You see nothing wrong with being a whiteknight." I have no control over what people think so why care unless i am debating about something and think they are wrong about something. "No anyone (like you) that cries about "muh toxicity" and wants to protect m'lady from the "toxic" virgins is a whiteknight." I am complaining about your toxicity in the hopes i could eventually help you not be toxic. "You've been so starved for pussy: from the behaviour displ…
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 08:18 PM
1

Your whole life ideology is based around hating foids so much so that dissent is down voted. God forbid i have an opinion differnt then yours and if i do then i am instantly put down it actually mirrors how we are treated with in society and yet here you are down voting some one that disagrees with you because of your radicalized ideology. bring on the fucking downvotes i am not changing my opinion because i get 5 downvotes from the same people who got hurt feelings from women and now they hate …
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 07:42 PM
1

Lmao any one who disagrees with your opinion is a white knight cuck so i am not surprised at the meme
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 07:33 PM
1

making a point but i will cry harder because i am not a faggot.. Atleast fags would fuck me unfortunately i am straight.
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 06:22 PM
1

Not a chad again i have had two cosmetic surgeries if any one should be angry its me.. What the fuck have you actually lost other then your pride from being made fun of or not having lost your virginity?? (Which i have also been on the but of every joke at my job and still havnt lost my virginity). Weather women like you or not its out of your control. You can let it eat away at you or can accept it and move on.
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 06:12 PM
1

So is being full of hate and anger a requirement for being blackpilled??
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 06:05 PM
1

Take all those fucking toxic ass holes with you and have fun with quarinteen!
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 05:51 PM
1

She is a contributor and has chadfished she was going to try and prove the sub wrong but found out they were 100% correct and now contributes.
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 03:52 PM
1

Fuucckk
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 03:10 PM
1

Ok how many chadlights?
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 02:23 PM
1

How many fakes were there?
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 02:19 PM
1

"I saw the change on my pictures between my bluepill pictures 2 years ago and blackpill + gymcel today." Sounds like anecdotal evidence..
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 02:16 PM
1

Hmm interesting that you check but out of 50 men how many are chad? Also
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 02:10 PM
1

Thank you for taking down results! If you havnt seen my post on the improtance on documentation please do!
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 01:47 PM
1

Yeah are you fucking serious? Soy does not affect your lower third thats the dumbest thing i ever heard. I know this black pill is going to be hard for you to swallow but your jaw is determined largly by genetics and your lower third is DONE changing at 20.
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 01:40 PM
1

There are a lot of girl incels because they are waiting for a chad to fuck them.This is why men don't ask out girls https://youtu.be/DmP1ier3R30 If you are ugly in person and ask out a girl you are a creep
/r/Chadfish23/06/19 01:13 PM
1

The girl is ugly as fuck tho
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 07:39 PM
1

The problem here is that not enough chad fish understand how to use the metrics i set up in order to measure account popularity as stated here https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=chadfish&utm_content=t1_erhboiv
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 05:16 PM
1

There are plenty of trials that prove that a chad could be as creepy as he wants and girls are ok with it. This link is a perfect example of multiple women all agreeing to it because of the way he looks. Lets not fool our selves into thinking a 4/10 could say the sane things.. https://i.redd.it/c3lsdbfoks431.jpg
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 04:54 PM
1

I think now your statement is possibly true due to tinder giving the bottom female wales access to the middle 80% of males while the top 80% of females battle it out for chad. Evolutionary wise wales didn't have access to such a large amount of males due to locality and an inability to be seen by large masses of males in their times of desperation
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 03:48 PM
1

Hair transplant 12 grand, rhinoplasty 12 grand, and i am debating on doing more shit for my hair cause its still balding.
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 03:29 PM
1

Which is a recipe for ending it..
/r/Chadfish22/06/19 03:22 PM
1

I am not sure. Depends on what you mean by black pill. If you mean frequenting r/ladyboners to watch women in their natural habitat and seeing how women will open up their legs for hot guys then atleast 2 years. If we are talking about listening to black pill comentators atleast 6 months. I have seen all the main chadfish expiraments during that time. But this steady stream of chadfish just makes me fucking sick bro
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 11:17 PM
1

This is some serious suifuel...yo honestly i feel like crying a bit..
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 10:32 PM
1

What about the oversaturation of chads? This would decrease the overall effect a chad expirament will have. If there are 50 chadfishes in one area and a girl gets matched with all 50 her ego is going to be through the fucking roof. "Well i got 50 chads to match me i must be hot" this will then increase her standards and will decrease her likely hood of accepting a fuck from chad and want a giga chad. Taking away from future chad fish expiraments.
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 10:27 PM
1

Well we would loose this treasure trove of knowledge
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 09:34 PM
1

I am 29 at 0 jfl!
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 09:25 PM
1

You might be smarter then me but i had a similar post. There also might be a chadfish saturation causeing the inflation rate of sex to go up
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 09:17 PM
1

I think thats a good point but on a larger scale its like what if everyone was a millionaire? Then there wouldn't a few million wouldn't be worth as much. If everyone chadfishes we are going to saturate the market and decrease the likely hood of good results
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 08:46 PM
1

Yo there is a wall with relationshpis but not sex.. Men will fuck just about anything thats been proven on here. With beckyfish.
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 08:43 PM
1

I think thats because this sub goes to the extreme to prove shit when in reality all you need is two profiles exactly the same on has a chad and the other one being you. Then compare the metrics laid out here https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 08:37 PM
1

So you are saying that not even 1 out of 1.2 million could figure it out? My upper level stats teacher was a women she also was teaching in her second laguage... Don't underestimate any one..
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 08:34 PM
1

I think its the exact inverse for men with relationshpis though.. Men usually don't go into relationships with uglier women. But they will fuck those same women... Women do tend to be in relationships with guys slightly lower then their looks match. But will only fuck high tier males. Evolutionary wise it makes sense. A women doesn't want to raise an ugly baby on her own but would raise a young chad on her own because of the high teir genetics. And with guys you would totally fuck an ugly women …
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 08:14 PM
1

What is the juggernaut theory?
/r/Chadfish21/06/19 07:50 PM
1

I wish but its a true story jfl
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 12:37 PM
1

Lmao best comment!
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 02:15 AM
1

I just got a 40 year old's number that is dtf she has multiple partners already i am just a fill in for the last second type of thing. She is pretty hot I rather have a 3/10 sloppy 5th's then a 0/10. A year After spending 24 grand on two different surgeries.. Jfl
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 02:14 AM
1

According to the dictionary whore /hôr/ nounDEROGATORY 1.a prostitute. Yeah so i don't know if any one told you this but males can also be prostitutes..
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 01:15 AM
1

Well we could decrease the amount of time with the account. So for example use all your swipes on a saturday morning with in a one hour period. Text through out the day on saturday take account offline sunday morning (24 hour period) and then analyze the sample on sunday. Reading through all the data. I have been looking into building an app that trackes swipes matches and messages. Obviously if i figure it out i would distribut on this sub
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 12:53 AM
1

It all depends on what things you can change and what things you can't. If your fat it is in your control to change that to be desired gymax. If you are balding (like i was) get a hair transplant(like i did) if you have a fucked up nose (like i did) get a nose job(like i did). If you are ugly figure out what about you is ugly and try to change it with surgery (may or may not really help that much). If you are short date uglier/fatter women. My friend who was a 10/10 stripper found that hotter gi…
/r/Chadfish19/06/19 12:21 AM
1

Lmao i like that so basically all women and men are whores then..
/r/Chadfish18/06/19 10:06 PM
1

Is anyone who disputes you a white knight faggot? Honestly the black pill to my knowledge isn't a cult and all outsiders who disagree with you shouldn't be called a white knight faggots. Just because i have a differing oppinion doesn't make me a white knight..
/r/Chadfish18/06/19 10:05 PM
1

Bro if i was a hot girl i would do the same thing.. Every time some one on this sub says all girls are whores I cringe a little because i just see a whiney fucking child who isn't getting what they want (sex) and is demonizing the people that won't give it to them (women). Reminds me of when my spoiled brother didn't get what he wanted so he would call my mom every name in the book until he got what he wanted. Being hateful towards women isnt going to change anything and life is to short to harb…
/r/Chadfish18/06/19 09:55 PM
1

We actually don't know how many matched with them so we can't really say "all foids"
/r/Chadfish18/06/19 09:37 PM
1

You dont have to give a screen shot of every one. Just take down all the info and list it. here are some metrics to use https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/
/r/Chadfish18/06/19 09:35 PM
1

Lmao
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 06:07 AM
1

I am a 28 incel i know the feeling man. All my brothers and sisters have been in more relationships then i have been on dates. Its a fucked up feeling knowing your youngest cousins got laid at 16 way before you did. Any way tesla, and isaac newton were both virgins when they died. Those men devoted themselves to logic and understanding the world and they both changed the world for the better..the good old science cope is pretty awesome if you ask me.. Or money cope and make as much money as poss…
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 02:09 AM
1

Agreed 100%
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 01:44 AM
8

Holy fuck bro you are a master chadfish.
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 01:41 AM
1

Oh fuck that sucks. I am an average looking guy and when i ask the landwhale face deformed pigs to let me eat them out they say i have to pay them... Are you fucking kidding me? I have to pay a land wale pig to eat them out? Like i couldn't even imagine asking a girl to pay me after giving me a blow job...its pure fucking insanity out there..
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 01:33 AM
1

Wow dude that is awesome that you kept track! I am really glad you didn't just pick out a few outliers to prove yourself right. Good on you man and then displaying the result. Now that is how you run a proper chadfish expirament!
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 12:59 AM
1

[1] is the probability of getting a date with a girl on tinder which is a good metric for below chads. This is a very good idea for figuring out different systems are best for success. [2] this would be the probability of getting a girls phone number but i am not sure about its overall importance when determining overall sexual attraction [3] this would be useful in determining the most speed and figuring out which chad was faster at getting each piece of info. As for your second part I was thin…
/r/Chadfish17/06/19 12:50 AM
1

Lmao i hope not
/r/Chadfish16/06/19 04:52 PM
2

Nah bro i am an idiot that did ok in a few of my math classes we need more sciencecels
/r/Chadfish16/06/19 04:31 PM
2

Omg same see my post here https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/
/r/Chadfish16/06/19 03:18 PM
14

Fuck bro what kind of surgery would i need to make my face look like his..
/r/Chadfish16/06/19 03:10 PM
7

In order for this to be called science we need to actually measure the progress of each chad. As stated in one of my earlier posts.. Saying racist shit and getting an unknown percentage of women to say yes to sex isn't proving anything by itself.. Again things need to be measure to account for confirmation bias and hasty generalization bias and small sample bias i reccomend reading my post on this.. https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/…
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 06:26 PM
1

Ohh fuck.. Thats fucking crazy.. Though if i had cancer and was girl.. I would be so fucking insecure about my hair i would probably do the same thing..they are as hard wired to seek out validation from chad as we are to seek out any women to fuck us. add in some fucked up thing like cancer for a yeah the convo might of given her enough suifuel to do it..
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 06:12 PM
1

This is such a great idea..
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 04:32 PM
1

I respect the fact you posted this. I don't want to dissuade you from posting past exploits as each one helps people see the reality of the black pill. But seriously do you not have a fucking heart man? I would of died a little inside after writing that. Science can be cold but this isn't science..mainly because more data is needed.
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 04:24 PM
1

Agreed its fucking crazy how much is based on looks..like i hate when some one way more attractive gives me advice because its the most basic shit ever. Bro its your personality. Or "its because your cheap" or "maybe you should take a shower." She is unable to observe that shit through tinder so stfu asshole
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 04:12 PM
1

I don't really have an opinion on what standards some one should be held to. I was just stating what I think she might be.
/r/Chadfish11/06/19 03:42 PM
1

I was thinking about this further and we could actually prove 100% that female selection of males actually follows a pareto distribution (80/20 rule) i know plenty of fish has already showed this but we could get similar results cementing it as fact. Or we could figure out what things would actually increase our chances of success by isolating certain aspects.. We could actually prove the red pill wrong or correct with this data.. By decreasing the attractiveness level of the male with a set of …
/r/Chadfish10/06/19 02:44 AM
2

I did a post about this earlier on this sub. Quantification of data is needed in order to prove something. I came up with some formulas to quantify results and actually get useful information so that different profiles could be compared. https://www.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/byim5m/lets_science_the_shit_out_of_this_mark_wattany/
/r/Chadfish10/06/19 02:20 AM
3

Lmao
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 11:09 PM
1

Look man it fucking sucks I am a 29 year old virgin but they are allowed to do whatever they want..If a girl wants to keep chasing chads the rest of their life and getting hurt who cares man. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results..
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 11:04 PM
1

Well 1.) Its not your job. 2.)sending some one legal porn and then telling them the person in the video is 16 and the person in the video is above 18 the person watching the video didn't actually do anything wrong.
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 10:56 PM
1

Is this sub just proving how terrible a chad fish can be and still get away with shit? Like we get you are angry that girls don't like you based on your looks and so am I but you should not be taking that anger out on other people. We have proved that there are outliers willing to do anything for chad/stacy.. This sub is only making me sad that black pillers given chad status will torment others for laughs..
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 03:29 PM
1

I was thinking you could also track each of these variables over time for each profile. So you could potentiality track how successful a profile is in any one variable so lets say chad A is a red pill and chad B is a blue bill you could track which one gets more matches faster seeing which one is better suited for getting girls
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 01:49 PM
1

All this expirament really does is prove Selection bias and confirmation bias with in the expirament though..
/r/Chadfish09/06/19 09:10 AM
1

I don't think it really proves anything though..
/r/Chadfish08/06/19 07:43 PM
1

I also think she might just be a chameleon type gf though
/r/Chadfish08/06/19 04:54 PM
1

Ok but one girl says "what the fuck are you even saying". The 1776 one just stops responding unless there is more text and then the veronica on also did not respond. Unless there is more to the convo.
/r/Chadfish08/06/19 04:45 PM
-3

But why though?
/r/Chadfish08/06/19 04:37 PM
1

I don't even know whats happening is he trying to prove that saying anything as a chad will make girls laugh? Honestly it isn't working. All i see is some one acting retarted and a bunch of girls making fun of the retard before ghosting. I am not trying to be negative here. I just want to see you guys posting more scientifically. The selection bias so far is insane here.. I think we can prove the black pill but these screen shots are not the way to do it.
/r/Chadfish08/06/19 04:34 PM
1

"Men age like fine wine women age like milk no one wants sour milk" age cope denied! smv for women constant until 60's. The fucking wall is a myth for all women dtf period
/r/Chadfish06/06/19 08:56 PM
5

I think both men and women are equally shallow.. Yeah sure guys will settle but if a hotter woman comes knocking they ain't gonna deny atleast that average guy wont might be a few outliers. Also i think the uglier guy/girl in general won't cheat because of limited options
/r/Chadfish06/06/19 08:50 PM
1

I think if its gotten from insta they won't be able to reverseimage search that particular image insta has a no reverse image search policy though
/r/Chadfish06/06/19 08:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter