TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PiratedEmotionDealer Archive

View 10 posts and 90 comments by PiratedEmotionDealer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
54

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW22/04/15 12:46 PM
19

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW06/05/15 11:12 PM
19

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW01/06/15 03:16 AM
16

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW02/06/15 05:33 PM
10

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW03/05/15 05:25 PM
8

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW21/05/15 05:11 PM
6

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW16/05/15 07:33 PM
5

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW23/04/15 02:14 AM
4

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW11/05/15 01:11 PM
1

PiratedEmotionDealer/r/MGTOW23/04/15 03:38 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Is Aaron Clarey a doxer of actual MGTOW, a trad-con who shames other men, and is a cunt? Yes, to all. Clarey hasn't been MGTOW for some time. Sorry. Whether or not MGTOW needs to be revamped is a term is a discussion which will pass Clarey and his irrelevant ilk.
/r/MGTOW12/06/15 02:16 PM
6

She catches them alright even when she she appears to be committing rape according to modern society-based conceptions of consent: http://thoughtcatalog.com/anonymous/2014/05/wait-a-second-did-amy-schumer-rape-a-guy/
/r/MGTOW05/06/15 02:25 PM
1

It was screened at Cannes so it will be released in October.
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 03:08 PM
9

Note: the film is about "lonely" people, but I think we all know full well that according to our Gynocentric society we can be classified as lonely even if we are just opting out.
/r/MGTOW02/06/15 05:35 PM
12

"At the same time, women are more sensible to exclusion, to social isolation. It is well known that the exclusion from a group and the disruption of social relationships can cause a physical-like psychological pain. It has been found out that women suffer greater than men in such situations. At a physiological level, they withstand a greater nervous excitation and their heart rate increases [Benenson et al., 2013]." -This is a major reason women especially (on the whole) cannot comprehend MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 03:24 AM
14

An accelerated bachelor's tax. "Do your duty and continue the species unless you're a commie." Species shaming.
/r/MGTOW27/05/15 03:43 PM
2

Haha. Anti-evolution, anti-gay, Roosh as captain...Yeah, go fuck yourself you trad-con. Also, I love how us MGTOWs are all celibtae and sexless. Nothing like a straw-man from the other side of the man-o-sphere. MGTOW is disappearing? PUAs and MRAs offer short term returns and continue to propagate Gynocentrism. No Roosh, unlike your popularity our numbers are growing.
/r/MGTOW26/05/15 08:16 PM
8

Also, male birth control in 2017 is something men out to carve out a budget for.
/r/MGTOW23/05/15 11:47 PM
2

If I can be honest, I believe this is a unfair generalization. Many of us do not obsess over women. For example, I like to post on the nature of Gynocentrism, its biological roots, its development in terms of Cultural Group Selection, how it is manifested in the egenral view of men as dispoable entities (ultilie resources for the species), and how many women often endorse this evoltuinary trajectory (not out of evil, but of biological necessity). To that last point I would also like to make clea…
/r/MGTOW23/05/15 11:42 PM
1

I will get back to your larger points in a few days. In the midst of university papers. Though I would ask that you clarify "wonky." Everything I have said on a descriptive level in terms of CGS/evolutionary biology in relation to analyzing Gynocentrism is based on the accepted parameters of these areas of study. For example, this discussion of ale imperative does not undercut my premises of basic Gynocentrism in terms of CGS. I only ask about this wonky comment because if there is something wro…
/r/MGTOW23/05/15 11:17 PM
2

-You decry generalizations while making generalizations? So all MGTOW are men who can't get female attention? All of us are "failures"? What is a failure? Why is a man a failure if he does not have a wife or chooses to not date? (You are aware that many MGTOW engage in STR, right? ) -Please specify what aspects are immature, what evidence these aspects rely on, why this evidence is invalid, and then provide your counter arguments/evidence. I'm willing to hear out honest criticism if it is actual…
/r/MGTOW23/05/15 12:38 AM
1

Think carefully, though, about what gynocentrism is. Gynocentrism is amoral, its not good or evil, its simply a fact of the natural world, its not enforced by women, or men, or anyone, its enforced by evolution. Gynocentrism is the idea that evolution has naturally selected male disposibility, it has naturally selected the preservation of the female over the male. When did I say different? I don't believe in morality for starters. Furthermore, you are to an extent conflating genetic and cultural…
/r/MGTOW23/05/15 12:31 AM
1

You don't need to understand MGTOW. It isn't for you.
/r/MGTOW21/05/15 11:46 AM
1

But if society collapses so does Gynocentrism. Better for to die in the ashes then live in slavery as disposable utilities. I'm looking to purge Gynocentrism through cultural group selection. Men are to be free whichever outcome. As I said before, this post was more of a descriptive analysis of what may occur with the trajectory of Gynocentrism in terms of Cultural Group Selection. Now we are in purely hypothetical prescriptive territory which isn't really my area of interest. I'm not really int…
/r/MGTOW21/05/15 11:41 AM
2

Sadly, most blue-pill guys will see this and think "damn those feminists. I mean all the trad cons and non-feminist women no doubt reject this even though they haven't? Uh oh..."
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:40 PM
3

This is the age of male sovereignty and female panic.
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:35 PM
1

As I said, I was more interested in tracing the descriptive reality of what might happen and I wasn’t looking to prescribe how society should be run, but I have some possible answers for your question. I would argue that if a MGTOW group has through voluntary segregation proven more effect than non-MGTOW groups and has outcompeted them then a MGTOW society would have to pursue regulated sex selection. Since females are technically not needed then only male children would be needed. As I remarked…
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:25 PM
1

Sorry this took me so long. The best way to think of it is say you have two groups relatively close: A and B. A has a cluster of rules, norms, practices, strategies for cooperation, greater production of pro-social behavior, punishment for norm violators, religious traditions (the psychology of religion research by Ara Norenzayan is quite informative on the benefits of certain religions in terms of cooperation), niche technologies as does B. A and B gain differing degrees of adaptive fitness fro…
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:05 PM
2

Saw it. Barring a few minor things it was spectacular.
/r/MGTOW19/05/15 12:02 AM
3

-MGTOW isn't against sex. Having sex and shaping your life around what women want to get sex as your life goal are two different things. Some men choose to be celibate others don't. We simply don't make life choices to get laid. MGTOW is against marriage (some will protest this, but the arguments are pretty weak) which is a slave contract in which the man has everything to lose if it goes sour. It robs him of complete sovereignty. -Love. Sorry to burst your bubble that is just physiology and bio…
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 07:54 PM
1

Sorry, why I assumed you'd even know about CGS was a huge mistake on my part. I'm sorry my background/research in evo. bio and philosophy is not as rigorous as your (let me guess) gender studies/media studies degree. In the end, you have offered no arguments and no counter-points to invalidate my claims. I guess you are conceding defeat to this teenager. Try staying out of a male, logic-based space. Blue-pill male or female you clearly don't belong here. Self-segregation is a smart option. Here …
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 01:33 AM
13

True. But when a man accuses a woman of harassment he needs a year's worth of wiretaps and video evidence.
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 01:28 AM
2

If you don't care about your coworkers just casually mention your "boyfriend" in a conversation.
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 01:27 AM
3

Robotic men (utility machines) valued for the resources/luxuries they provide. The patriarchy in action.
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 08:16 PM
1

Can you speak to whether Max comes off as supporting character to Furiosa? That is my gripe with everything that I have read. Feminism and Gynocentrism is rampant in everything in society so feminist undertones don't shock or trouble me like it seems to bother the redpill/MRA's.
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 07:56 PM
5

UPDATE: Just saw the film and the reports I read were full of shit. Max is as much the hero as Theron (in fact more so as he ends up saving her as well as the others lives several times) and it is an extremely well made film. The only vague feminist idea was this phrase of "who destroyed the world" which could be interpreted as men or warring tyrants. So forget my pointless worries.
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 07:52 PM
1

Yes, they can be backed by modern evolutionary biology and Cultural Group Selection theory which I am pretty well read in so spare me your feigned attempt to know what I am talking about. If you are not educated on certain subjects that's fine. The basic premise that mammalian females seek stability of resources and that males being used as disposable utilities has a pretty solid basis in terms of inter-group competition (CGS) If you want to have a serious discussion about these points I'm all f…
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 03:59 PM
1

Fair enough. I broke it up and tried to explicate the dynamic of this process more effectively. However, you've yet to offer any contribution beyond pointing out a convoluted sentence. If you have such interest in this issue why not offer something in the way of an argument? Also, regarding the blood/sweat you had pouring out of you: could you explain CGS more effectively? Can you point out anything wrong with the statement other than that it was merely convoluted (I will give you that)? If you …
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 03:03 AM
1

Again, the old adage you quoted doesn't really map onto what I was talking about and fails to get at the more complex biological aspect I was hoping to discuss. Some old saying from some old man half-drunk (no doubt) doesn't really express what I am getting at. Or would you say that "Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get" is a to-the-point articulation of chaos theory and the problem of randomness? You remind me of people who try to equivocate what a Buddhist mys…
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 12:51 AM
2

This is a great response. I will think on it and get back to you probably by tomorrow. As for 1 and 2 I am in agreement so I will move on to 3 when I respond. To be fair this was more of a see what happens and will it uncouple certain ingrained behaviors come what may rather than policy planning for segregated societies (including the potentail cost if my scenario succeeds), but let me see what ideas I can conjure up.
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 12:42 AM
1

That's one way of interpreting what I wrote. I'm not sure how what I wrote is undergrad (whatever that means to you). Considering this is a subreddit, not an academic journal, I would assume (especially having seen many of the other posts lacking basic punctuation) my schema need not be a polished work. I apologize for the lack of ornate prose. By all means ignore the subject matter and condemn my vulgar syntax. If you could point out anything I wrote that is incorrect in terms of CGS or is inco…
/r/MGTOW17/05/15 12:28 AM
2

I never claimed you don't know as much as I do. Frankly, all you need is access to a few journals and you can learn as much as some asshole spending a fortune at Harvard. As someone in graduate school I will admit the terrible truth: almost everything I learned due to interest I did on my own time. I don't disagree with your basic claim about our sexual dimorphism I think we were just talking past each other. I apologize if I came off unnecessarily aggressive.
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 11:34 PM
2

"No. You can't erase millions of years of evolution in a few generations. We're still running the same Operating System we've been using for the last 50 thousand years at least." -First, if you look into Cultural Group Selection (CGS) theory you would see that the spread of various successful group paradigms (their culture: norms, social practices, etc.) happens much quicker (due to the fact that they confer greater benefits on the victorious or emulated group and therefore provide better fitnes…
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 11:30 PM
1

First, that is from the old MGTOW manifesto and many MGTOW no longer adhere to what that document was about. For example, the old manifesto did not push for a marriage strike and argued for clearly conformed gender roles whereas MGTOW does not follow this schema on the whole. Second, right-wing means different things in different contexts. In the States right wing means socially conservative. On the continuum of political philosophy the farther left one goes the more centralized the State is and…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:06 PM
4

Who said enforced segregation was good, optimal, or necessary? Also, where did you get enforced? I questioned whether certain conditions would bring about a rough splitting between the sexes and if this occurred what would happen. (I only mentioned permanent separation as a scenario, not a command, in which Gynocentrism had not disappeared.) I said if this initial segregation (brought on by various forces and not some God of MGTOW) occurred would it bring about the end of Gynocentrism as an evol…
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 10:03 PM
5

Do you leave space for going your own way while offering certain criticisms of Gynocentrism to inform others who are not MGTOW?
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 09:44 PM
4

A century? Can you explain why you came to that number? Some have postulated thirty years or so. Even if you are correct that is just a small part of what I was considering. Also, who cares if it is a century away? Don't read the post as it clearly is about what happens when certain conditions are met and the consequences of such conditions being met. Also, the West may collapse but civilization in terms of social groupings will not and that is the bigger target of my post (human groups). Tribal…
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 09:23 PM
3

"Is this supposed to be academic?" -Is this supposed to be condescending? If you actually knew what I was referring to you might provide real counter-arguments. Nothing I have stated here is out of sync with modern evolutionary biology and game theory. Most of what I am discussing here is drawn from work on Cultural Group Selection theory from thinkers like Robert Boyd, Pete Richerson, and Joe Henrich. "The species needs eggs and sperm to recombinate DNA and produce a healthy supply of humans, e…
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 09:23 PM
1

I made a series of arguments which can be backed up quite sufficiently. You've offered nothing and will continue to offer nothing. I guess you can't learn you have no value here. You have nothing to latch onto. Go find a man. You seem to know how to use your holes when the work is to be done.
/r/MGTOW16/05/15 06:38 PM
7

And now that you have been called out and offered no real reason for your sudden inquiry into MGTOW you resort to the time old female tradition of language shaming calling all of us cynics (which means apt thinkers and realists) and paranoid (meaning overwhelmingly accurate in our descriptions of female behavior). Sorry dear, MGTOW men don't bend to shaming tactics. You've just proven every response here correct.
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 10:02 PM
3

Also, whenever a woman comes to learn about MGTOW I'm always interested to know why? And scholarship is never the real reason.
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 05:55 PM
6

I tried to explain NAWALT and she just let it fly over her head.
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 05:53 PM
8

"What in your opinion would help a woman be more valuable part of society and a better and more decent human being in general" This is what you asked and I gave you a frank answer. So far women contribute a disproportionately lower amount to society than do men. I explained to you at a root level why this is the case. If you don't like reading about female behavior than so be it, but this is the only honest response I can give. As for female role models why would you come here for that? If femal…
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 05:52 PM
6

Well, no offense the central claims about female behavior don't change because your country financially robs men via divorce to a lesser extent. All societies are at root gynocentric as non-gynocentric society could have survived in terms of the field of group-competition that shaped our species in terms of cultural group selection. In response to your question there is no real MGTOW one-size-fits-all response. I personally don't believe there is any way for women to change their behavior. This …
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 05:18 PM
1

Look, I don't want to berate someone with autsim, but you really should get a grip. If you are going to undermine a series of claims you may want to counter said claims or at least undermine them. So when you are done being fondled by your uncle please come back with some arguments.
/r/MGTOW14/05/15 04:57 PM
4

Shaming language: the last, somewhat desperate efforts of the female/blue-pill man. Perhaps I am the laughing stock of the world. Nonetheless, my descriptions are quite on point.
/r/MGTOW11/05/15 10:56 AM
2

So psychoanalyzing is all you've got? No response to actual points of descriptive analysis?
/r/MGTOW11/05/15 03:33 AM
3

No. We are working off of evolutionary biology (as well as cultural evolution in a feedback loop with the former) and descriptive behaviors of the respective sexes. This simply manifests a typical mammalian female strategy in terms of adaptive fitness. Seeking resources and whoring out for them doesn't mean women are evil or bad it means they are skilled resource gatherers (which operate like whores; sex = a mechanism to acquire material compensation of some kind).
/r/MGTOW11/05/15 01:25 AM
11

This article raises good questions regarding Zimbardo's theory: "The pile of unanswered questions grows. Is there something about men that draws them to experiences that cut them off from schoolwork and relationships with women? Is technology to blame, or is their increasing dependence on it a symptom of something else?” “We read a lot in Zimbardo's book about how the world is unfair to men, and how they spend their time chasing all kinds of ineffectual pursuits and avoid reality and responsibil…
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 04:05 PM
14

So Zimbardo thinks we ought to look at how men are opting out, but now why (factors such as: false rape allegations, society's view of men as toxic would-be rapists, the general gynocentric roots of civilization, the realities of marriage as a futile slave contract, financial rape, etc.). Let's debate the effects, but not examine the causes. Sounds like an articulate diagnostic dissection to me.
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 04:01 PM
9

No. It is coming from any honest man or self-reflecting female. A whore is a whore even if she isn't asking for straightforward payment and ultimately there is always a form of compensation to be had.
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 03:51 PM
1

Can you explain how any government will not always inevitably become gynocentric in that women are the larger voting block and will, in the end, vote for greater distribution of resources and privileges that women seek (creating the feedback loop in which a State caters to female gynocentrism in return for votes)? How will you curtail a State from turning gynocentric? This sounds like Chapin's delusion.
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 03:21 PM
4

Traditionalism and the family unit is nothing more than a sacred fetishized conservative take on gynocentrism. As we can easily observe from evolutionary biology: factors or conditions can necessitate new strategies for adaptive fitness for organisms. There is no one and only strategy. Family units are not the holy grail of society. They were the best strategy in terms of Cultural Group Selection and thus will be hard to out-compete/overturn, but this also means that the family unit will always …
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 03:16 PM
0

I doubt it.
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 03:10 AM
2

To be sure, Artificial wombs and MGTOW growing will certainly alter the social context of the relations between sexes and will begin the gradual demarcation of Homo sapiens into MGTOW and non-MGTOW populations (not geographically, but in the sense of whether one subscribes to a MGTOW philosophy or not). One certainly could predict conflict between MGTOW and non-MGTOW as we further stray apart. In terms of Futurology: I see the eventuality as the species fracturing into MGTOW and non-MGTOW popula…
/r/MGTOW10/05/15 03:03 AM
2

I almost despise the "buddies" more...Nothing like men who will let their libido undermine the bond of male friendship. Better to die alone on the ashes.
/r/MGTOW09/05/15 02:55 AM
1

NAWALT = the branch is still useful and sturdy, but she can always enjoy the adjacent ones for a little acrobatics. Again why the fuck do men get married? How can you know if she isn't riding the carousel behind your back? And if she is, but you can't prove it or never know (every guy who claims NAWALT likely falls into this delusional frame of mind or at least has a partner who ultimate sees him as expendable or the best possible, current resource pool) you still lose out in the divorce. How ca…
/r/MGTOW09/05/15 02:50 AM
1

Sure. Use it as you like.
/r/MGTOW08/05/15 09:28 PM
2

The basic arguments I can agree with you on, but you seem confused about MGTOW's purpose on some level as well. For example, you state "MGTOW has the potential to be a force for good or evil. If the social outcasts of the movement win, it will turn into a woman hating group that falls prey to the same traps of self-pity that feminism is so guilty of. However, if the level headed men within can prevail, it will become a great men’s rights advocacy group." There is no good or evil. There are evolu…
/r/MGTOW08/05/15 07:02 PM
7

I said nothing about feminism. The point of the video is to illustrate that men, even as victims of rape, are mere utilities in a gynocentric society. In this case a man can serve as a utility for laughter. His pain or abuse is not worth news stories or any notion of sincere debate. Our society reacts as a sovereign white knight when a UVA hits social media without a lick of evidence because female nature must be defended without any reflection. Male rape is seemingly a joke or a minor issue. Ev…
/r/MGTOW07/05/15 04:34 AM
2

So now you're back-peddling. Come on, don't be so negative. You seem to be angry about something which motivated this post. Tell me. I'm here to listen. I'm trying to help you overcome your anger and not become so imprisoned by what you can't control. You seem to want self-control, but do not have the emotional maturity that is required. I can guide you out of your negativity.
/r/MGTOW06/05/15 09:02 PM
2

How was anything I said blue pill? MGTOW is about moving beyond and opting out in order to develop oneself according to their own telos. That doesn't mean criticism or analysis of gynocentrism is forbidden. One needs to know what they are dealing with and how it may create obstacles for one's attempt to achieve sovereignty. However, admitting that there are causal factors is not "playing the victim." No one here is asking for gynocentric reform laws or tumblr votes or compensation for victim-hoo…
/r/MGTOW06/05/15 08:49 PM
2

"Adults learn to control their emotions and channel them. how is this relevant to mgtow? well, something in life isnt fair, and its hurt a man in some way... he comes here to cry about it, and people give him support. This is childlike, and then they get into this pattern of crying about things instead of taking ownership and self responsibility. which is what adults do. " Just because some men here want to share their experiences to inform some of us younger MGTOW does mean they are childlike o…
/r/MGTOW06/05/15 08:24 PM
1

I would venture to guess that women, even feminists, will start to look far more like the Religious right than they imagine. Once the social capital of reproductive value is no longer their trump card I imagine we will see women resorting to hollow notions like the sacred tradition of females giving birth. Women will resort to arguments about what is natural and what is abnormal. Our biggest enemies will always be TradCons and Feminists as two extreme manifestations of Gynocentrism (which itself…
/r/MGTOW06/05/15 04:55 PM
1

I understand what your getting at, but what you are describing here is ultimately gene replication underpinning her motivations. All human sexuality supervenes on reproductive drives which themselves are just the means by which genes propel the replication process via the body, the replicator vessel. None of us on the level of our personal psychology appear to care about our genes, but all of our sexuality which drives us is our genes seeking to copy themselves. All of our survival and identity …
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 09:10 PM
2

No. Thankfully, no.
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 09:02 PM
2

Better question: Can women divorce the government (assuming there is no substitute for the latter's privileges bestowed to women)?
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 09:01 PM
2

Clarey was involved in doxing actual MGTOW content providers like Stardusk and Barbarossa. Clarey basically thinks MGTOW can only be guys run through the ringer. So fuck those young men who have learned from the older MGTOW. They must be "cowards". Note: in another video he continued this line of thought in order to make MGTOW "look better" for women as if an actual MGTOW could give a fuck about what women think about MGTOW. Applauded by Paul Elam. Clarey like Chapin is another Republican (no I'…
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 08:54 PM
2

I don't care if you are a troll, Muhammad, Jesus Christ, or some junkie in Karachi, Pakistan...You are a female looking to weigh in on how men reconfigure (for some of the veteran MGTOW, rebuild) their lives in positive way while seeking mutual support on opting out of gynocentrism. To be quite blunt, go fuck yourself.
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 03:12 AM
3

It really boggles the mind. The minute I saw the word girl the OP's opinion became valueless and impotent. If this was a thread on some non-MGTOW topic the OP being a girl would be of no consequence. However, in a MGTOW thread a female's pov is (sorry to say) of no value. The fact that some "MGTOW" are so quick to be "inclusive" and indulgent defeats the whole opting out concept. Is that all it takes for some of you? A little waft of the female nectar and your principles/sovereignty take a back …
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 03:08 AM
2

Talking with women about various topics is fine, but talking with women about MGTOW is akin to talking with creationists about biology: completely pointless and a near fatal dose of auditory poison.
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 03:00 AM
2

Some people in the comments here represent the whole Aaron Clarey problem within MGTOW. (From my pov you eventually find yourself either leaning toward PUA-MGTOWS like Clarey or you are on the other side with bar bar, RBK, etc. MGTOW isn't about siding with a team, but if you play to the whole let's try to be inclusive then you are certainly taking a stand.) I am referring to these supposed MGTOW who then try to cater to women or shame men for not indulging them. MGTOW is a male space. Whether t…
/r/MGTOW05/05/15 02:54 AM
11

Homo sapiens is no higher on the rungs of Nature's ladder. I think the character Rust Cohle from True Detective articulated this most clearly: "I think human consciousness, is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware, nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself, we are creatures that should not exist by natural law. We are things that labor under the illusion of having a self; an accretion of sensory, experience and feeling, programmed with total assurance that we are …
/r/MGTOW04/05/15 05:23 PM
8

This getting some play on various subreddits: I'm past the point of anger where I just laugh when a women accuses a man of rape, ruins his life, and turns out to be lying...Her recompense: 32 days in jail. This is why I reject the MRA route (who have posted this story on their thread no doubt as an example of the "evils" feminism has created, not female victim routines generating natural protective responses from deluded males). You can never expect to get society to create parity between the se…
/r/MGTOW03/05/15 05:27 PM
3

And never could be. Feminism is founded on gaining the rights of men without the same effort. Men and women had mostly the same station in life for most of history (feminists often moronically see aristocratic men in history and think men had power over women as opposed to a small landed elite had power over everybody) with men fighting the wars, working the industrial factories, etc. In fact, it isn't even hard to consider that a peasant/working class woman had a slightly better standard of liv…
/r/MGTOW30/04/15 02:07 PM
2

Decent article...Too bad they make the common mistake of blaming feminism for the sexodus, for men going their own way and not women's general nature (which is not evil or bad merely a biological-social descriptive reality) simply made more bare (gynocentrism more manifest) via feminism. Women could ban feminism tomorrow, but would they give up all the gynocentirc laws and social privileges that they acquired from it? No. I didn't think they would. As bar bar said perfectly, women simply have mo…
/r/MGTOW30/04/15 02:01 PM
2

I provided a full explanation as to how this woman was treating men as disposable. You offered no arguments. Also, only a feminist would throw around the "you're a misogynist" when they had no relevant argument. Classic biological defense mechanism (all you needed was tears). Also, MGTOW isn't misogynist. I don't hate/dislike/judge women as bad or evil. I'm a descriptive realist. Most of us examine male and female behavior through an evolutionary biological/anthropological lens and describe the …
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 08:33 PM
1

Snoop? Public access kind of contradicts the idea of snooping, no? Also, your question seemed purposefully obtuse and sarcastic so I assumed (correctly) you came here with no real interest in discussing the video or have any genuine interest in understanding MGTOW. Cataloging the trolls is useful for our community as we know ahead of time who not to reply to in the future or to just ban. Since you're a feminist I assume that the latter should come soon...You know we need our "safe spaces" too so…
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 05:59 PM
6

Fair on some accounts though overly idealistic about Europe. Having lived in Belgium for nearly two years many things are the same: many of my fellow peers and the general youth get wasted every weekend at the major bar market. The intelligent people are the ones studying something specific that they care about. I knew similar interesting people back in the States. Intelligent people are few and far between in Europe as much as in the States. The delusion that Europeans over here are all debatin…
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 05:51 PM
0

Oh...Judging by your comments you're a feminist so explaining this to you was a pointless endeavor. Disregard my rational response. Patriarchy, misogyny, oppression, something else regarding phallus violence...
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 05:27 PM
1

Do you mean besides the entire opening where she basically laments having a son instead of a daughter (even jokes about how noble she is for not giving him back or aborting him which I'm sure would be vilified if it was a man saying the same about his daughter) and the rest of the speech where she explains how he will be raised to be a literal pedestal to lift women up? Do you mean besides where she applauds the idea of making the function of her son (one could presume as well as for all men), h…
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 05:22 PM
2

What I enjoyed most was the comments defending the girl in the vein of “look she was crying and she clearly feels bad.” Lazy hypothesis: like many mammals Homo sapiens have adapted/learned to react to the crying of conspecifics which stimulates feelings of empathy and concern as a response to their (the former’s distress). In the case of a woman, crying becomes a skilled defense mechanism (though this already appears in children generally). By triggering (not in the SJW lexicon) the core suite o…
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 12:45 AM
2

BL does apply to modern Homo sapiens, but most men don't want to acknowledge their function as a utility, as something less than for women. Man has always been a resource source for women. Here, I will let a male anthropologist (female supremacist) speak for me. http://chronicle.com/article/The-End-of-Male-Supremacy/228769/ Also, empirical philosophy (as well as philosophy of science) and evolutionary anthropology are much more empirical (as they are in discourse with and incorporate scientific …
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 12:15 AM
5

This is why you like "sociology"...The types of claims you are making here could never pass muster in a hard science like biology. Too much speculation with no real substantiation or evidence...Your last statement especially makes your ignorance of biology quite clear. Briffault's law is far more attune to the actual anthropological record and the dynamics between the sexes (especially in relation to the different pressures on the respective sexes).
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 12:06 AM
4

When you "pull" do you buy a girl drinks? Do you take her on dates? Do you buy her things? Do you pay for flashy clothes to heighten your SMV? Pussy is never free...You merely fail to look at the bill you're racking up.
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 12:01 AM
4

Your entire "sociological" study is already a poor form of scholarship because you assert a premise you can't possibly support. How vast is your study of MGTOW? What is the scope of the sample size? What is the methodology you are operating with? Based on what evidence can you assert that most MGTOW whose relationships with women failed to work failed due to some issue on the man's part? Why do you assume that a functional relationship can ever really exist? What I mean here is that it would app…
/r/MGTOW25/04/15 11:56 PM
9

Did she swallow the patriarchy?
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 02:54 AM
9

I call bullshit (I could be wrong). Focusing purely on an inability to get sex. There is nothing shameful or wrong with being celibate, but using MGTOW as the means to give women the "d" seems an odd motivation. Resorting to the "play video-games and be a recluse" stereotype we are often, along with Gamergate, reduced to by feminists and women shaming men for not chasing the golden vagina. Nothing wrong with these outlets, but the choice of words is eerily reminiscent of a talking point for mock…
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 02:40 AM
3

Love doesn't exist (no more than morality does). It is reducible to bio-chemical reactions, the release of hormones like Oxytocin, pair bonding, the reproductive drive as the basis for attraction, and other such factors. Once you realize "love" can never be anything more than biology (unless you believe in fairy dust and the truth of your "feelings") then you realize that the basis of a loving relationship is rooted and maintained by biological factors. It is nothing magical or special and one i…
/r/MGTOW22/04/15 01:30 PM
17

NOTE: This is not merely to highlight feminist stupidity. I simply found this a more honest expression of the general view of male disposability and of males as a utility for women that most women will never say publicly.
/r/MGTOW22/04/15 12:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter