TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Piroko Archive

View 22 posts and 2,772 comments by Piroko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
108

Piroko/r/MensRights16/02/13 11:02 PM
49

Red Pill TheoryPiroko/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 08:32 PM
27

Red Pill TheoryPiroko/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 04:19 AM
23

Piroko/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 04:29 PM
23

Piroko/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:47 PM
19

Piroko/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:27 PM
14

Red Pill ExamplePiroko/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 06:22 PM
11

Piroko/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:27 PM
10

Piroko/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 08:23 PM
8

Piroko/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 01:52 AM
5

Piroko/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:07 PM
5

Red Pill TheoryPiroko/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:38 PM
2

Piroko/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:55 PM
2

Off TopicPiroko/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 01:02 PM
2

Rant/VentingPiroko/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 01:13 AM
2

Piroko/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:19 AM
1

Off TopicPiroko/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 06:49 PM
1

Piroko/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 06:31 PM
0

Piroko/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 05:29 PM
0

Ask Red PillPiroko/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 07:34 PM
0

Piroko/r/MensRights13/02/13 05:02 PM
0

Piroko/r/askTRP14/03/14 02:39 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,772 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Why did "No Man's Sky" win Best Original Game at E3?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 10:51 PM
7

Yet Da Vinci didn't actually succeed in creating very much. He contributed nothing of great worth to mathematics, realized almost none of his inventions, most of his art pales in comparison to his contemporaries, and his philosophies are shadowed by Machiavelli. About the only noteworthy idea he contributed to the future was his airscrew drawing, which served a role not unlike that of Roddenberry's warp drive in that it inspired more diligent people to do the heavy thinking.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 02:55 PM
11

I can't be bothered to care what happens to them. They chose this.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 03:38 PM
7

Honestly, is there anything but transactional sex for Russian women? No. You should know better.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 09:41 PM
1

I stand corrected TRP stands for the fascism of Charles Darwin. The stance that natural selection is the law of existence and that survival is good; thriving is good. The strong rule the weak, the fittest inherit the Earth. Survival is self justifying. Success is self validating. Power is both a means and an end.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 05:48 PM
3

No. Trump was given a loan from his father, of a size that ANY starting entrepreneur with a good business plan could have secured on their own from a largish bank or venture capitalist. It's difficult for non-entrepreneurs to understand but securing a few million to buy and renovate some apartment buildings is not a very difficult thing to do. Trump scored a few big successes that built a brand in commercial/residential/resort property management, and from there it was just off to the races. He …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 07:37 PM
3

Is Donald Trump beta In short, no. There is a critical point at which the phase transition between beta bux and alpha ceases to matter, and that's the point where you own your own 24 karat gold trimmed Boeing 757. Trump falls in that supercritical zone where wealth and power become functionally indistinguishable and all you can say is that he has a lot.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 10:53 PM
14

For a man who hasn't entirely given-in Even mgtows achieve self-respect. In a sense their "fuck the world" response is a necessary act of psychological self preservation. Build a tower out of solipsism and schadenfreude and watch the world burn. "The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy. To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided b…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/17 08:19 PM
6

Fidelity doesn't exist Posession is nine tenths of the law. I am sympathetic to the view mgtows and mras agree upon, which is that this is to some extent a problem of law and how society deals with gender and agency. A dim and chauvinistic view? Sure. But borne out by the behavior we see in the wild. Our society might pride itself on being enlightened but it isn't necessarily improved by enlightenment.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 09:03 PM
1

I reject your pretense that they are contextualized thusly. But more important than what I think on the matter, or what you think, is what the reformationist muslims think on the matter. They too reject your pretense. And like nations pointing nuclear weapons at each other, Christendom cannot afford to listen to you when the other side harbors the interpretation that islam demands that they use violence to advance islam. When a society (or even a SPECIES, "YOU KILL ANYTHING THAT HAS MORE THAN TW…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 02:29 AM
1

There is no edict in Islam which 2:191-193 2:216 3:56 4:89 4:95 8:12 8:39 9:5 9:14 9:29 You are either lying or you are ignorant. So which is it.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 09:04 PM
1

But I don't think the Islamic goal is for domination. And for that I think you're a blindly optimistic fool. This religion, is unique in the degree of its belligerence towards secularism. There is historical presidence for this; following the conquests of north Africa and Persia, there were no state sponsored attempts at conversion, nor were previously non-muslim communities intruded upon. That's whitewashed bullshit. And also irrelevant because Islam is going through its own equivalent of the p…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/17 09:43 PM
1

So if you are gonna argue Islam is bad It IS bad if you're a feminist. It isn't if you're an islamic male. It may also not be if you're a religiously flexible man who sees feminism as a problem to be solved. We have two choices. We can acknowledge that Islam's adherents despise us and will never coexist with us, or we can acknowledge that Islam also despises feminism. In the end, non muslim men will either have to fight Islam because it will try to destroy them for being not muslim, or join isla…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/17 01:08 AM
24

Okay so what I'm not seeing in there is what you were even studying. I'm gonna take the CaptainCapitalism stance on this one and say that if you're going to drop money on college, you'd A) better damn well take it seriously because it is costing you, and B) it'd better damn well be for something that pays. When I was in engineering college it was 15 hour days 6 days a week to keep up. Got the piece of paper AND THEN I could take a break.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/17 01:47 PM
1

Define what that would be in this case, fully taking into consideration the nature of TRP and islam. As I see it, this is a "join 'em or beat 'em" situation. Because they decided to make it a zero sum game.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/17 04:37 AM
1

There are two ways this can end. Either TRP eventually converts to islam en masse, or TRP goes all deus vult. Take your pick.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 09:25 PM
8

Love is fleeting. Beauty is too, but at least its quantifiable.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/17 08:09 PM
1

really think anyone is inherently mean/cruel You mean aside from anyone who has ever shot at someone else using infrared?
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 07:05 PM
1

Pity is unwanted. Change is my objective. I reject the notion that using amphetimine compounds is an equitable exchange between gain and cost. I stop short of calling their distribution a conspiracy outright but I do not think that it is a coincidence that the state spends a lot more time trying to go after other drugs while leaving recreational use of these relatively untouched. I think that you are an idiot to use them, that the state is perfectly fine with you using them because the state wan…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 07:23 PM
3

Twenty fukkin years straight. I was one of the early experiments. Test subject. Sure, I got a 27 composite on the ACT in 7th grade so lets give him CNS stims and keep testing to see what happens. They don't tell you when you're a kid what the effects are on your perception of reality and empathy. They don't really tell you anything, just "here, take this".
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 12:56 PM
1

Of course you refuse to accept it. Who would willingly embrace the idea that you have no genuine agency? You're a free man, you're in control, you can tell when you're doing something right or wrong for yourself. You know the limit. You know what's safe. Bullshit. Amphetimines throw all of that completely out the window. How much of your reality is fact or fiction? Do you even know? How can you?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 06:46 PM
1

And you need to stop playing the game they are trying to make you play, boy.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:58 AM
0

I've been doing amphetamines occasionally for years and I'm extremely healthy. You have no objective frame of reference to prove that to yourself. You're using substances that manipulate your perception of existence, and I assure you that the effects last far longer than your mere recreational high.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 11:45 PM
1

No, it is not. Do you know why we prescribe this shit to children and try to get adults hooked on it recreationally? Control.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 11:39 PM
7

No. I was inhibited by the state. And you are being so too. Just with less paperwork. There is no safe use of these compounds.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 11:36 PM
10

I'm addressing ALL usage of CNS stims. As someone who was on them for decades and then woke the fuck up. If you're advocating the use of amphetamine compounds, you're an agent of the statists. Whether you know it or not, whether you acknowledge it or not, you are.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 11:30 PM
60

I'm going to put this as succinctly as possible. You're a goddamn idiot, and CNS stimulants (both ADHD treatments and anti-depressants) are a large contributing factor to the mess we're in societally.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 11:21 PM
1

The deal that corporate America, and many other countries but I am using America here, offers you is literally the best financial deal ever offered in the history of humanity, and the second best deal of all eternity. The average person is not intelligent enough to take advantage of it.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 05:58 PM
1

Inquisition-style courts vs obesity epidemic. Tough call. I guess that's why I'm so gung-ho about WWIII. A hard reboot looks better every year.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 10:27 PM
4

In short, Podemos is the most feminist political party in the world. Its a fukkin inquisition over there. America's problems are just obesity and entitlement.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 05:36 PM
6

I live in India You live in the one place that can credibly be said to be worse than America and Spain.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 04:44 PM
8

You're in control of your brain Counterpoint... "Der Mensch kann tun was er will; er kann aber nicht wollen was er will." "Man can do what he wills, but he cannot will what he wills." -Arthur Schopenhauer And before you ask who the fuck he was, it was he who freed the first of us.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/16 04:42 AM
2

The problem is that men let the state enable women.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 08:23 PM
0

"I want to sit in a confortable chair with a beer and watch he world fling itself apart from making so many bad decisions. Until I die or things change."
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 05:43 PM
1

Well, where do you live? Even Roosh admits his advice is not appropriate in all environments. Now I know why I’m not a big hit among men in the Midwest: my cold approach game would get you quickly marked in your town and ostracized. The best strategy here is to have a lot of friends and date the women in your social circle. Without a social circle in the Midwest, you’re a bit screwed when it comes to landing the best women.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 02:08 PM
1

I think you needed to revise this a couple more times before posting, its kinda a pile of disjointed thoughts. Yes. There is a problem with MGTOW. To keep it short, its that its a delusion of convincing yourself that you have agency and you are exercising that agency by not exercising it. When the reality is, that many of these men (not all, but many) have very little agency, and refuse to do what is necessary to increase their agency.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 12:57 PM
0

Been there. Have friends who fled from there. New York is only slightly less of a shithole than Los Angeles. What I love most about Des Moines though is that we enforce our panhandling ban.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 12:40 PM
0

Choose wisely I chose in 2003 when I saw what power we have over the coast. If the midwest decided to declare war on the coast, two hundred million people will be stuck in a mad max wasteland unable to escape because they can't fill their cars. Two weeks is all it would take. A two week embargo of electricity and natural gas and the coast would capitulate.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 12:07 PM
6

I'm gonna say no. Social media is just a way for SJWs to get dirt on people. You're better off going cold turkey and wearing a Trump hat in public.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/16 09:59 PM
0

live in SF Well there's your problem. How much are you paying in rent? Because my mortgage is probably 1/6th of that and I live in a nicer city.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/16 07:33 PM
8

Everybody dies. Its really that simple.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 06:37 PM
2

And more. Enjoy the decline, western civ is fucked.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 02:35 AM
1

Welcome to the Somme. Keep your head down.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 02:20 AM
10

The last four in a row were all crazy. Fuck it, I'm out. This shit is getting worse every year.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/16 11:40 PM
4

I bet Hillary Loses. Badly. Make America Look Great Again
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 09:16 PM
8

Realistically, no. For a person of average talent with little time the only way you make money on the internet is porn. And really it's only women who can manage that. The problem is that you don't have a plan. You have a goal (make money online) but without a plan your chances of reaching that goal are basically zero. Women can make money with no plan because women can always fall back on the original profession. It takes no talent.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/16 12:08 PM
1

If you're tired of starting over, STOP GIVING UP.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/16 03:08 AM
0

I wouldn't consider "not so subtly suggesting that violence is literally the ONLY solution that ever settles anything" to be moralizing. It's LIKE moralizing, sure, but it's not very... moral.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 09:35 PM
-1

That's a coward's answer, grasping at truisms to avoid an uncomfortable reality.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 04:52 PM
0

battling SJWs won't work Bullshit, you're just afraid. Afraid of death, afraid of the judgement of history, maybe even afraid of yourself.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 04:35 PM
2

That wasn't what I was getting at. Say what you want about the morality of it, killing your enemy removes him from the battlefield. Permanently. You win. They lose. The war ends, there is peace for a time.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 04:11 PM
1

that's how it rolled back then I'm just saying that's how shit gets done. It's timeless. And it's part of our present problem.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 11:16 AM
2

The Romance of Three Kingdoms A classic tale of war, in the golden age of Chinese history I'm gonna go out on a limb here and assume that a lot of people die in this story.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 01:29 AM
0

You think that's the plan? Nah, that's just a sideshow of the week. THE PLAN is to have ten million muslims trojan horse Europe and impose Sharia in a couple years.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 01:16 AM
2

America is still great Oh really? Do you drive past rotting factories and derelict elevators daily? Past the bones of abandoned railways and over crumbling bridges on poorly patched roads? Through nigh ghost towns where the local schools have been shuttered for decades and consolidated into county wide districts? America used to be great; and then NAFTA happened.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 01:14 PM
1

We never had serfdom in Viking Norway. But thank god my ancestors decided to book it for the new world before it became what it is today. We still have the hope of Making America Great Again. Norway on the other hand is doomed.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 03:19 AM
3

I have a plan. It's just contingent on making america great again.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 01:02 AM
1

That's your plan? Keep your mouth shut about the truth You're not even following your own fucking terrible plan.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 12:24 AM
2

Okay so how do you propose we deal with the fact that they've legislated us into a society where the body of law deprives us of the tools necessary to deal with women as they really are?
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 11:56 PM
2

I'll make it really simple: The state does not have to allow divorce. It doesn't. There are many countries that don't. America didn't until well after ww2. Allowing divorce encourages unwise behavior.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:41 PM
2

Because unwinding the extremes feminism has wrought IS my cause. From my perspective as a citizen I have two choices. Choice A: "Women have the vote without conscription, this privileges them above men, therefore we must compell women to fight in war as men". Choice B: " Women are not subject to conscription, they do not face the horrors of war, men however must chance it. In exchange for this burden, men are given a vote." I like women, so I choose B. I really don't think you want me to fight t…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:33 PM
9

This isn't a fight. I assure you if men start fighting, you'll know.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:27 PM
0

By your own admission you dislike "third wave feminists", but you're mad at us for not liking feminism. Has it occurred to you that feminism, to us, appears as a single front? That we see people who say "I'm a feminist but I'm not one of those feminists" as being no different? You use the word, so you give your credibility to them. That's it. You are a number in their horde.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:22 PM
2

Trump isn't going to win Actually he is. His opponent will be Hillary Clinton, and all this summer, the news will be sizzlingly hot with Europe being invaded by barbarian hordes. The frequency of mass rape incidents and terrorism will increase to weekly, the fences will be stormed, and the shooting will begin. And Donald Trump will pin it all on Secretary Hillary Clinton, the architect of the disintegration of Syria. He will turn it into a referendum on the safety of women and children, Hillary'…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 11:47 PM
2

Yes they are getting better. We're going to Make America Great Again. The turning has already happened, progressivism is in retreat, peace is withering into conflict, and that great phoenix, patriarchial civilization, is about to be reborn from the flames of war which are its very sustenance. "These are great days we're living. We are jolly green giants walking the earth, with guns."
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 05:12 PM
2

Its all shaping up pretty well. Only a few more reasonable people left to drive out of the pool and then things can get started properly.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 04:53 PM
27

I'm not a Trumpster The correct spelling is STORMTRUMPER. 30 kilometers at least was the distance between their house and the police station, but the police was there in less then an hour Goddamn you people have shitty police. 20 miles in an hour? What, did they stop at every light and get gas and donuts on the way? In America if you say "shots fired" on a 911 call, they'll be doing ninety on the side streets (that's 150 km/h).
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 01:31 AM
47

You aren't in a fireteam, to use the military term for it. The first fireteam you are ever in, in your life, is your family. Then your closest friends in school, then your drinking/shooting/sporting buddies, or depending on your job, your coworkers (particularly in the military). Men over the millennia have adapted to spend large portions of time working with a small pool of people they know well. It's... a mental need. It's such a need in fact that it's a contributing reason to why men who come…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 02:55 PM
-1

I don't dispute that he's jingoistic and kind of a banana republic dictator. But again, that doesn't suggest that he's working for Clinton. It's an expression of how disfunctional the country is. "In reality, its dictatorship rather than democracy that radically advances government reforms." -Yang Wenli, Legend of the Galactic Heroes
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 08:20 PM
0

Ooookay. That was catchy and more or less true. Don't see how it backs up your claim that he's Clinton's bitch though.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 07:45 PM
-1

It hinges on one thing. How much of a narcissist is Trump? You clearly believe that there is a limit, a point where his narcissism yields to greed. But I don't think that point exists. Trump's behavior over the last thirty years screams narcissist more than greed. He never really got into the stock market; the tech and housing bubbles barely registered on his investments. He's a real estate tycoon, an economic dinosaur in the mold of Steve Wynn or Walt Disney in his later years. Self-aggrandizem…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 05:12 PM
2

May his reign end like James Buchanan's did... In secession. Trump has my vote because I don't want to share a government with people from Florida.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 01:04 PM
14

what should i do? Lawyer up. how fucked am i? Short term, fairly. Long term, not very. You're not in jail. You are, however, about to be used as a battering ram by those of us who have it out for fascism in schools.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 03:06 AM
1

A decade is more than half my age Ah. So if I was to tell you that "Dinosaurs" is "Roseanne, but with dinosaurs", you wouldn't know what the fuck I was talking about. Padawan, you missed a glorious time of shitty television. I can tell you precisely when it was that TV turned against fathers, and its name is Tim Allen. We even had youtube videos before the internet. People would send in tapes, big chunky magnetic VHS tapes, of cats flipping out, people clocking each other with bowling balls, and…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 05:50 PM
1

I haven't watched scripted tv in... Probably a decade.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 05:32 PM
2

Watching TV is not very red pill. Unless you're lifting.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 05:07 PM
1

I will admit that I do not have it in me to be John Brown.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 10:21 PM
1

And that is why I say enjoy the decline. When you give me a state that is in open rebellion, I will pack up and move to join their army. Until then, wake me when the noise starts. I have no desire to be one of the early martyrs for the cause. I want to be in it for the win. Once the problem has been simplified to "keep your fucking head down and cover your fire lane" then I'm in.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 04:48 PM
1

The strong, dominant, empowered choice is to replace the state. Naturally. Now, let's get down to the logistics of it. You got a plan? Because realistically it ain't gonna happen until one or multiple states are willing to openly defy the federal government. Until then, any attempt will be lunatics out in a hut. Now to do that, you're going to have to take over a legislature in the ballot box.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 04:33 PM
3

Well actually it's already happening in Europe. This isn't rape culture, but what follows will be. The question, the thing that has yet to be decided, is whether it will be under the cross or the crescent. It WILL be one or the other. But the question is which. It will depend on how long it takes the leaders of christendom to realize that there is only one commodity with which they can bribe young men into chancing death to save society, and how long it takes them to stomach doing what has to be…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 03:06 AM
2

Your response to this is to offer LESS direction and control? The alternative is war. Seriously. The enemy is the state that says they have a right to run amok. So the choice is this: enjoy the decline, or replace the state. Which will it be? Because I am sure of one thing, and that's that we can't fix it so long as we are bound to this current body of law. The constitution was beautiful thing 250 years ago but it has been turned against us.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 02:32 AM
69

Said it before: This isn't rape culture, but what follows will be.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 12:16 PM
3

Well this reminded me why I unsubbed for a while.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 01:25 AM
4

Are these poets and musicians just ‘blue pill beta males’ in the eyes Not "in the eyes". THEY JUST ARE. Period. There is an objective truth sir, and it's that women are conditional about love. It is a vehicle, not a destination. It serves the purpose of facilitating the continuance of themselves, both in the now and in future generations. That is its sole function and and if it appears to them to be failing in that capacity then it is jettisoned as garbage.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 04:30 AM
-13

This is quite possibly the worst post I've ever read here. And after that stormfront lunatic last month that's a feat. You don't get it, okay? You just don't.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 04:17 AM
-1

Look, we already know it's a parliament of whores. All the posts in the world aren't gonna change that. Now if you want real change then there's always secession.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:30 PM
11

You're reaching a bit on "standards". There is a scientifically verifiable basis for attraction. Average facial features and a pronounced hourglass waist. Repeated studies have confirmed the universiality of this standard throughout our species across cultural and racial lines.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 04:01 PM
2

but a hemp field surrounded by Is a good way to get the USDA and the DEA to drop on your ass. They've got computers combing the near-infrared data from NAIP (National Agriculture Imagery Program, a periodic image set produced by 9 satellites and some overflights) for spots where hemp signatures are boxed by other plants.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 03:48 AM
2

I was just wondering if a better method has come along yet? Because you take that piglet away longer, it picks up a different smell, momma's gonna kill it.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 02:57 AM
17

most of you guys are fake as shit Including yourself. At a first read my impression is that you have insecurity issues. But please, do tell. Exactly what was it you were thinking to accomplish with this post?
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 10:25 PM
2

No, you missed his. But seeing as how your account is only a day old I suppose that's to be expected. Who's your main?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:11 PM
1

You have no more proof that you're right than that I am wrong. All of the causes you list exist in women too. Yet women do not commit spree killings at the same rate. To be male is to possess agency. These individuals feel they lack agency, and so they become violent to prove they possess agency. Women to not instinctively prize agency in the same way or to the same degree men do, so they commit fewer mass murders.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 09:13 PM
2

"You do not understand." -Kosh, Babylon 5 It is lack of masculinity. They go violent in an attempt, misguided though it is, to validate their masculinity. To be male is to act upon the world.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:14 PM
1

Suit yourself. You might learn a thing or two if you'd open your mind to the possibility that other people do actually hate you and lack a better nature.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:30 PM
-1

No one will listen You yourself put the lie to your words. people are multilayered and feminism Is a reductionist cult that brainwashes its adherents into seeing all issues through the lens of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:15 PM
-1

Its not us against them McCoy: "War is never imperative, mister Spock." Spock: "It is for them doctor." -Star Trek, Balance of Terror
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:47 PM
1

Makes us look like So? There is no practical difference between progressivism and feminism at this point. To oppose one is to oppose the other. You're concerned about the optics of it. There is much more to be concerned about than that. Make no mistake, there WILL be civil war before progressivism is ousted. They will not go down quietly or bloodlessly. They WILL use violence when it becomes apparent that everything else has failed, and we will be forced to respond in kind.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:14 PM
3

long time lurker Yeah well lurk more because I knew this would be garbage when I saw the title. You don't get it. Or, you're a shill for the other side. Either way, this doesn't belong here.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 05:07 PM
1

In short, yes. However, fixing it requires treatment that, at least to feminists, will appear as bad as the disease.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:50 PM
1

Its not a conspiracy. Its just a behavior. Whence it comes from, I don't know that we know the brain well enough to say. But they do it and its been documented that they do it as far back as antiquity.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 01:43 PM
11

I'm not convinced most women have the capacity for introspection necessary to understand what they're doing, let alone discern the possible reasons why. They are protecting the narrative, out of self preservation.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 12:52 AM
25

fortunately the girl host does call her out on her behavior Standard operating procedure. When the evidence of sluttery is incontrovertible, they will turn their guns on the guilty. Protecting the narrative is more important than the individual.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 10:24 PM
1

Mmmm how about no. It's Progressivism. Progressivism has become a religion all its own. It came about because of the immense social differences and history of antagonism between the states starting in the War of 1812 and continuing on up to today. It is a religion that believes two things: its own righteousness, and that heretics deserve what happens to them.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 04:10 AM
2

The movie was not actually written as Starship Troopers. It was written as generic shooter action movie Bug Hunt, and halfway through preproduction they realized "hey, this seems familiar." They read the book, decided to rewrite to mock it, and got the rights without saying how they'd present it. Or at least, that's the story. I think it was really a planned attack to discredit the book to the millennial generation before they read it, because his predictions about the XX century were proving a …
/r/MensRights02/11/15 10:20 PM
5

No, women do. Male feminists do not.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:32 PM
11

Four works all feminists need to read. Starship Troopers Harrison Bergeron Atlas Shrugged Nineteen Eighty Four
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:54 PM
5

And you can only have that in a society where the state does not impose "equality".
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 04:53 AM
4

You didn't get it. My solution to all doctrinal disputes is schism. If the church has lost its way then you loudly excoriate it and start a new one. Like Luther (Lutheranism). Or Henry VIII (Church of England). Or George Fox (Religious Society of Friends). Or Joseph Smith (Church of Jesus Christ). Or Michael Cerularius (Eastern Orthodox Church).
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:18 PM
6

Any thoughts on what I should do besides the email?? Nail it to the door and start a new church.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:44 PM
2

To be entirely honest, I don't care. They're all spineless blue bloods to me anyway. They are the elite and if they decide to fold and accept someone else's frame, then the do not have anyone to blame but themselves.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:02 AM
3

Don't knock Juan Solo, it's a good pun.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:52 AM
3

Hell, he's lucky it's his parents and not her's.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 12:26 AM
9

I will be blunt, sir. Do you drink or abuse any substances? Do you have a criminal record?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 10:30 PM
10

Okay, well let's attack the most obvious problem here... Why did YOU lose custody of your daughter to YOUR parents? For that to happen there's got to be something you aren't telling us.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 10:24 PM
0

Ah, awake again to make up some more bullshit?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:10 PM
-7

Why should I waste even one moment of my time on something as random and incoherent as a woman's mind with none of the societal tools my ancestors had at their disposal to deal with it? "The majority of the Spaniards who come here are of low quality, violent, and vicious." -Cortez to Emperor Charles V on why he refused to stop issuing encomiendas
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:56 PM
1

Staged. That's a theatrical bottle. Real bottles are pretty hard to break to begin with and when they do they make largish knifelike bits.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:09 PM
1

There is no evidence Then don't go making up bullshit percentages you can't defend. They don't have to. But its the only way to win.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:15 PM
1

Applaud the reframe. Evidence where? Lets go with your numbers though for a moment, despite lack of proof... Say Milo brought 70% as you said. Say that the share Milo brought was equitably divided over his readership. .7 * .745 is .5215 So 52.15% came from Americans who read Breitbart.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:04 PM
1

Wrong. 74.5% of its readers are American.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:55 PM
1

Conspicuously absent Just who the fuck do you think Breitbart's readers are?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:52 PM
1

Because you should be fully aware from years on the internet that Americans always give everyone the benefit of assuming they too are American.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:50 PM
1

Yes you are. Here's a diagram.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:48 PM
0

I am. Well, Iowan.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:38 PM
1

The progressives are better at it, as this conversation demonstrates. You divide yourself off from allies your enemy has already lumped you with.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:35 PM
1

Its recognizing that the behavior of the other side is divisive. The progressives have divided the society. All divisions between people who aren't progressive, benefit progressives.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:33 PM
1

Are you American?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:29 PM
1

How is saying "hey, support our stuff and we'll support your stuff, or keep doing your own thing apart from us and be destroyed by the other side" divisive? The goal isn't to split the MRM, its to get the MRM to stop cherrypicking issues thinking that it can accomplish anything without the rest of thr anti progressive coalition. You can't sit on the sidelines and hope to win, you have to join in for the entire fight. Progressivism must be confronted in all quarters. Everything it values must be …
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:26 PM
2

You're the one doing the dividing. Like it or not the left has already divided the discussion. You are their enemy. The right is their enemy. You are the one saying you aren't the right. But so far as your enemy is concerned, you are.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:18 PM
1

Uh... What? I'm saying stop thinking of yourself as separate.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:15 PM
1

No, I'm telling you to stop dividing yourself off from the greater anti progressive coalition by cherry picking issues. Milo demonstrated that you are stronger with the rest of the coalition than without it.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:55 PM
1

We are divided, and that is why we fail, and that is why they win. I'm telling you: "staighten up and fly right", otherwise we're going to keep losing.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:52 PM
1

First, its not a separate issue. Second, you just agreed with me. We will not win divided. Only a massive coalition against all of progressivism, will defeat progressivism. Your myopic focus on birth control could be rendered moot with a simple prohibition if they control the law.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:46 PM
3

How will birth control fix the problem that a woman you never met, can blame you of something, and white knights will throw you under the bus? How does your solution purge the influence of those who reject Blackstone's formulation?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:10 PM
1

We have reliable birth control. It has changed nothing. Prove that it will end the things you say. It sounds like a snake oil. Police already today believe a woman's accusation without any proof. You could never have met a person ever, be pointed out, and be expelled from college. How will birth control fix that?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:02 PM
2

Tell me, sir. How do you picture things working out your way? How do you win and keep "men's reproductive rights" when your fellow man will throw you under the bus for sex?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:48 PM
0

Traditionalism is to the only vehicle for delivering men those rights sir. Poverty is inevitable. The left has destroyed the economy to create slave foot soldier voters who will defend their entitlements.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:32 PM
1

My war? You mean your war. I'm here telling you "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and you're going "no thanks". You need the rest of the anti progressives more than they need you. Milo's success at raising funds is proof of that.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:20 PM
-2

Well now see that's where you're wrong. Milo delivered thrice, in one day, what this community couldn't do in two weeks. Proof is in the pudding.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:16 PM
0

Their loss. I want to win.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:13 PM
1

Because the other side values it. Perhaps you are not aware as to how total war works.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:12 PM
-1

only authoritarians and fascists Yes. And? We can't beat progressive authoriarianism without being authoritarian ourselves in order to bring about the dismantlement of progressivism. There will be a civil war over progressivism. They won't go quietly, they'll draw blood first and we will have to defend ourselves. You can't get more authoritarian than the military needed to win a war.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:08 PM
0

Pointing out nothing. Cherry picking issues. Nothing more nothing less.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:04 PM
0

Again, way to miss the forest for the trees. Cherry picking issues.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:01 PM
0

Way to miss the forest for the trees. Cherry picking issues. Beating toxic progressivism will require a massive coalition.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:56 PM
-5

Proof is in the pudding. You insist it is not a left right issue, yet Milo delivers thrice in one day what this community couldn't in two weeks. "What happened here was a miracle, and I want you to fucking acknowledge it." It is time, for r MR to grow up and admit, to itself, that they must take sides in the broader culture war. You cannot cherry pick. You cannot say "I'm against this one bit of toxic progressivism but not the rest." You have to take the side on it all. Full court press. Every i…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:39 PM
2

Even in score music there are still rules. Classical music is so rigidly hierarchical (composer -> conductor -> concertmaster -> soloist -> percussion -> everyone the fuck else... except -> saxophones) and meritocratic (want to be the best? be the best. plenty of other people want to be) that you don't see many SJWs. They avoid fields where status means talent + continuous hard work to maintain skill.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 02:30 AM
2

"The effect of music is so very much more powerful and penetrating than is that of the other arts, for these others speak only of the shadow, but music of the essence." -Arthur Schopenhauer ("It was he, who freed the first of us.") Modern art is garbage, the last bastion of true art is classical music.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 01:06 AM
3

We already knew Walt was evil.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 05:44 PM
-1

They are going to keep dying until everyone left alive has a stable source of food. Hi. I live in Iowa. In every direction away from my house, there is corn. Or soybeans. If the United States were to collapse into anarchy, all that my state would have to do to create a defensible national border, would be to occupy northern Missouri, fortify all the bridges over the Mississippi and Missouri, and commission a brownwater navy of patrol boats and drones. We today produce 30% of our electricity from…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 03:07 AM
3

Well... there's absolutely no way this can backfire as an obvious and desperate ploy based on unflattering assumptions about the intelligence of his supporters.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:32 AM
0

I broke the latch on my dishwasher. I ordered a new one for $7 and installed it myself. What did you accomplish this month?
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:35 PM
6

Raised quaker, but I don't anymore think god exists. God didn't have anything to say. But certainly seemed to say a lot of hypocritical and contradictory things through others. Its a quaker thing, we don't have clergy.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 06:38 PM
44

words WRONG! Conan, what is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 06:29 PM
1

Advocating? No. Pointing out that it will eventually happen TO US BY THEM if we don't stop radical islamics from overrunning the occident? Yes. What I advocate, is defending our fucking borders against foreign invasion by barbarian hordes. You know, to AVOID repeating what happened to Rome.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:10 PM
1

Progressives believe we are past war and that prejudice is outdated. But as the article says, if we do nothing, the immigrants will overrun the west. We can either have war, now, to keep them out, or we can have war later, when they start to take over.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 10:31 PM
0

"Guess who's coming to dinner..." -Chekov We will have war, one way or the other. Either at our borders now, or in our lands later.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:23 PM
3

Oh I don't think it was a trainwreck sir. I think it was a calculated preemptive strike.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 01:33 PM
1

What are you going to do about it? The state must be rebooted. That much is certain. Franchise without responsibility must be ended to make lasting changes. However... DIRECT action against the state cannot succeed. Such actions simply slap a bandaid of American patriotism on a massive infection. Working within the rules of the state will not succeed, as we've been trying within the system the whole time the other side has been winning. We have two options: We can wait until the state falls apar…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 03:45 AM
-1

Aggression and anger are not the same. The belief that they are is bullshit made up by SJWs and psychologists to try to undermine their enemies passionate argument style. People (moreoften men) can be joyfully aggressive without hate, just as people (moreoften women) can be passive-aggressively hateful. The belief that all overt aggression must be driven by blind white-hot anger alone is applying the norms of women's behavior to men.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 04:31 PM
-1

You keep insisting that I'm angry. Repetition does not make it so. I am however annoyed that you seem to think you know my mind. If I was angry, I would go take out somehow. While you sit there typing a reply, I've switched back to my yamaha and am blazing through another piece on my quest to be a halfway decent piano player. And when I've finished, I'll refresh this page and see if you've typed another round of "let's play amateur psychologist."
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 02:21 AM
1

Ironic, you got every single point in that post backwards to how I think. I AM bitter. But I am not bitter towards women, individuals in general, or corporations, for acting in their own self interest. They done what was right by them and I can't fault them on that. I fault people who DON'T act in their own self interest. They DON'T balance things out, they desire to become white knight social creditors and because of that they throw society into imbalance. White knights want to give it away to …
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 01:17 AM
2

Everything I have said thus far IS indifference. I can wish someone ill without hating them or being angry, if they've earned it. They have. They deserve what happens to them. They do not deserve my sympathies. If they want my sympathies or my help, then that too must be earned. In that regard to that earning, they are starting out with owed debt for all the borrowing society has done on their behalf and for their benefit. Whether it be through schaudenfreude or more direct means, I will be repa…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 04:20 PM
1

No, I'm talking about an intelligent treatise on the flaws of democracy. If you choose to mistake the forest for the trees, that's your problem.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:18 PM
1

find a suitable woman I think we can agree that the women expecting sympathy for their bad their bad choices, are not "suitable". Hence why I am deaf to their grievances and feelings. I will not lift one finger to help people whom I think are getting what they deserve.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 03:04 PM
2

Now you're refuting your own previous post. Hence why empathy is considered a deeper, more substantial response to someone; sympathy, on the other hand, is cheap. You're asserting that empathy is like to sympathy. That they do the same thing, and that one is just greater than the other. But if that were true then they would have to be used the same way in spoken speech. They aren't. If someone said "you have my empathies", it'd sound weird. Because they don't do the same thing, which is my asser…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 02:45 AM
2

Hence why empathy is considered a deeper, more substantial response to someone; sympathy, on the other hand, is cheap. If that were true then the phrase "you have my empathies" would work the same as "you have my sympathies".
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 02:29 AM
3

Okay let's us the American Heritage Dictionary. It's the least SJW'ed. Empathy: The ability to identify with or understand the perspective, experiences, or motivations of another individual and to comprehend and share another individual's emotional state. Sympathy: A feeling of pity or sorrow for the distress of another; commiseration.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 01:43 AM
4

A dictionary. Zipper is in there too, you should buy one.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 01:28 AM
11

Empathy, noun: the action of understanding, being aware of, the feelings, thoughts and experience of another without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated Sympathy, noun: the act or capacity of entering into or sharing the feelings or interests of another A person can be empathic without being sympathetic. Actually, the capacity for empathy might even be a prerequisite to describing someone as emotionally manipulative or abusive, as you have to have a comprehension of …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 12:54 AM
22

Men, I know the schadenfreude of "post-wall women" is sweet, but please strive for an end goal of empathy as you move through the anger phase. Firstly I think you mean sympathy, not empathy. I can understand a person's emotions and still wish them ill. But regarding your point... why? Seriously, why? Sympathy is not owed, sir. If it is desired, it must be earned. These people do not deserve sympathy. They selfishly and foolishly squandered their advantages while they had them, and now those adva…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 10:47 PM
3

how would any of you respond to this By pointing out that egalitarianism is naturally antagonistic to families, and thus, evil. Rousseau was quite forward about it. Rawls tried to rationalize around it but couldn't.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 10:17 PM
7

"Society placed stricter controls on women" In exchange for being in large part occupationally exempted from trenchfoot and scurvy (in addition to all the DELIBERATE hazards of war).
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:58 AM
3

Uh... easier said than done. I say that as a quaker who grew up surrounded by them. No, if you want to see the solution... read Dune. That's what it will take. Just like it did with Rome. The barbarians come in and make it clear that might does indeed make right. Because we are afraid to do the same.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:42 AM
3

AVFM is avoiceformen, and DE is the DarkEnlightenment subreddit. AVFM was a men's rights site and they have had a few good pieces. But all the competent writers left because the owner is arrogant, defensive, and petulant. Comes off as the sort of person you'd expect to cover every wall of their house with tinfoil.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 12:25 PM
10

Joke is on them. I wouldn't hire someone from a degree mill like fullstack. If they don't make you find the bug in quicksort in fucking lisp as your final, then to me you aren't a software developer.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:15 AM
3

Well, since AVFM went Edmund Fitzgerald Dunno what this means but AVFM's alexa numbers have collapsed. The SS Edmund Fitzgerald was an iron ore freighter that snapped in half in a storm on Lake Superior in 1975 and sank instantly taking the whole crew. It's an apt description of what is happening to AVFM.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 01:21 AM
3

Well, since AVFM went Edmund Fitzgerald, the mensrights sub has had more DE/TRP material. I think it's getting through to them that culture war is regular old zero-sum total war and that the other side will not compromise.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 10:11 PM
8

We knew England was fascist. At least we didn't to wait for them to start a Hitler Youth program.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:15 AM
20

The ray of hope is that religion is slowly dying Firstly, no it's not. You know what the fastest growing segment of the world population is? The AMISH. They're experiencing exponential growth, doubling every 22 years. Plus the muslims are rapidly conquering Europe. Secondly... Okay, I was raised atheist in a decidedly not-atheist town. I will never believe in cloud sky king, I will never have "true faith". However... growing up I knew a lot of people who will never comprehend enough about either…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 04:04 AM
0

"What is the converse of authority? Mr. Rico." "Responsibility, sir." "Applause. Both for practical reasons and for mathematically verifiable moral reasons, authority and responsibility must be equal; else a balancing takes place as surely as current ‘flows between points of unequal potential. To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster; to hold a man responsible for anything he does not control is to behave with blind idiocy. The unlimited democracies were unstable because their citize…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:04 PM
1

Nope. Just honorably discharged veterans. Heinlein democracy.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:30 PM
1

Don't fucking flounce around saying "ladies you can't have this" This is bigger than just women. Democracy gives people authority with no responsibility. That must change. Franchise must be limited to those who have demonstrated that they place the community above themselves.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:07 PM
2

Because one is counterproductive. MRAs believe that you can fix the system by working through the rules of the system. TRP and DarkEnlightenment reject this as false. The MGTOWs have grasped that society offers them a shit deal, and back away from it. This response is rational though to TRP and DE it seems defeatist; but at least it isn't counterproductive like MRA whining is. Ultimately, our society will have to fall to fix the problems we face. Progressivism has poisoned the well and only an a…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:50 PM
3

As their pm has proudly proclaimed in the past, Australia does not have a bill of rights.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:34 PM
3

Not bloody likely. Aside from Jefferson most of the founders were leery of "too much" democracy. The idea of allowing people too poor to own land to vote (to say nothing of blacks, women, and teenagers) would have been too much for them. For that matter, if they could have scribbled no Catholics into the text without looking like rank hypocrites they would have, as most of them were Unitarians and Universalists. Had they known the Pope would one day travel to speak before Congress, and that he w…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 02:52 AM
3

It isn't an accurate model for human life on Earth. We do not live in a post scarcity world. Most of the human population of Earth lives in abject poverty. In millions of homes, the most sophisticated machine to be found in the household's possessions... is a stamped AK-47 or a gas vehicle (often no more than a motorbike). WE by comparison... are capital. Though even in our own country there is capital and then the districts. It won't be a "beta uprising" the brings down the west, sir, it will b…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 02:38 AM
1

As a genre? Very doubtful. All wrong and a bag of chips. Just not pop music. Opera is generally quite red pill, and classical is uniquely intolerant of change. There are conductors who would angrily dismiss and blacklist a musician for merely dying their hair an abnormal color. The skill and time necessary to play at the highest levels means that people with their minds on anything other than music do not make it very far professionally.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:11 PM
0

I'm not entirely sure where you're going, but for myself, I know I'm opposed to the delusion of egalitarianism.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 01:40 AM
2

Being a Tom Hiddleston fangirl.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:13 PM
2

Polarizing The government is useless and against us. I don't know how it is that authoritarian SJWs have duped minorities into fighting and dying in droves, resisting authorities. Maybe they didn't, maybe they're opportunistic parasites and the drug war is what incited the fighting. I dunno. But I do know that black inner city America has reduced parts of the country to the third world. What we have is a profound distrust in the ability of government to do anything. They can't create jobs, they …
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 12:35 PM
2

The MRM could have that in almost every industry. No. It's because they are direct, reductive, and have no scruples. Their damn the torpedoes attitude, the fact that they are not afraid of what the SJWs can say or do is why they win. They aren't afraid of retaliation.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:54 PM
1

always so dry here It is the gradual realization that working within the system will never accomplish the desired result. GamerGate has accomplished more in one year than the MRM has in a decade. Because they are direct, reductive, and have no scruples. The MRM is doomed to irrelevance. GG and TRP will be the forces that defeat progressivism and restore balance, because they refuse to play the game by the rules the progressives have set.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:49 PM
0

In the grim dark future there is only war. The progressives will continue to grow in political power until they are finally able to attempt confiscation. Armed men will be dispatched to confiscate guns, they will be met by armed men, and blood will be shed. Afterwards, the libertarians will know that they cannot reason with the progressives, and there will be only one option available to them.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:20 PM
1

... I'm not sure you understand my meaning. For every one person willing to lash out in spontaneous violence, there are many, many more who are eager to be violent with the nominal validation of a uniform and a flag. Sooner or later there is going to be a civil war over progressivism in this country. The crazies we see today are merely the Free-Staters and the Border Ruffians. People forget that Bleeding Kansas went on for seven years.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 12:34 PM
12

There is, and can be, no justification for them. Despite however badly you think society has violated its contractual obligation to you, that does not give you the right to infringe on the contracts of those who are more satisfied with the service. You are missing something. The "at consent of the governed" also means that the governed are responsible for what they consent to. The white knights are sell outs, as we all know. They are so desperate for an advantage in the SMP that they sell themse…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 03:15 AM
2

I was honestly surprised at myself because I failed to do so even for just mere 5 minutes. You didn't spend enough time as a spy in EVE Online then. Learn: The secret to getting people to talk is to ask questions. That's... it. That's the secret. You can keep a conversation going for hours and hours by asking questions and showing a modicum of interest in the answers. Do it enough and eventually you learn how to steer conversations.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/15 01:14 PM
1

If your solution is altering who has franchise... It can't be done while preserving continuity of the state. Even a Heinleinesque model (where anyone can earn franchise but only through a term of service) would be impossible due to the 24th Amendment.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/15 02:14 AM
2

The short answer is yes. The slightly longer answer is that I think equality is an unachieable fantasy at best, and a means of controlling society at worst. I am not traditionalist because it is appealing (it isn't), but because it is the only model that produces a stable society. I have seen enough of human nature in action to know that progressives are irrationally optimistic. They assume people are better than we are, and fail to safeguard against the possibility they're wrong. So I'm more of…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:53 PM
1

And most of those things fall into what I said... "endemic to the human condition and quite impossibile to address entirely" Take male disposablity for example. Progressive mrm sees it as a problem to be addressed. I see it as a reality, which society must be adjusted to compensate for. We ARE disposible, so we OUGHT be entrusted with both greater obligation AND greater authority. That is, the duty to die in war, and the privilege of franchise (which should be excluaive to us as compensation for…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:28 PM
1

The push back is just a small part I disagree. It is the most central part. Progressivism is the chief cause of, and advocate for, many of the other issues. Confronting and defeating that ideaology is a necessary prerequisite to addressing all the things issues that can be attributed to it. The ones it doesn't cause tend to be endemic to the human condition and quite impossible to address entirely.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 12:37 PM
1

I have told you what you need to read to understand what progressivism has done. Go. Read it. Then message me and I'll answer any questions you have. Here, I'll make it easy for you. This is the seminal segment of the book. There's a lot more good material, but this is the chapter that matters the most with regards to progressivism. It's 7 pages (pg 90-96). Probably take you 10 minutes. Read the material, and learn, and then ask me a question about what you don't understand from it. I also want …
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 11:16 PM
1

I always forget Harsh Mistress; but yeah he wrote a lot that delves into "why". But I think of all, Starship Troopers is the one. If you're gonna read only one book, that's it, it explains enough with the history & moral philosophy lectures. Plus his predictions about technology stay vague enough that the book doesn't seem 55 years old.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 10:45 PM
2

I suggest you start with Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers. That will give you a basic understanding of what damage progressivism has done. As books go it's MUCH more entertaining than 1984, Animal Farm, Atlas Shrugged, and Fahrenheit 451. It's also the only sci-fi fiction book on the required reading list at four US military academies. PM me when you've read it and I'll be happy to answer any questions you have. An even shorter read would be Kurt Vonnegut Jr's Harrison Bergeron.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 10:03 PM
2

you might need to think long and hard about the fact that women are literally just people, exactly like you. It's not women's fault explicitly, the fault is on progressivism. Secession is the only viable endgame.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 09:49 PM
6

precipitated by granting franchise I've been saying that for years now. Nobody seems to want to hear it and nobody wants to accept that secession is the only solution.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 05:48 PM
1

What is it going to take? Nullification. Secession. Real civil war.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 05:13 PM
1

Are you insinuating something or do you actually want to know?
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:20 AM
9

It isn't false, just deceptive. It is true that women do in aggregate make less than men, before correcting for education, work performed, hours and overtime, maternity leave, and just general choice of profession. When you account for everything that could explain the difference in actual takehome pay, the difference vanishes.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:07 PM
8

No. Mutual polite indifference is all either has to expect from the other. If they want more than that, then driving out the antagonistic progressives in their camp would be a necessary prerequisite.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:09 PM
1

Hardship I live in Iowa sir. By my standards the entirety of the populace of both coast are stupid, weak, annoying, and morally bankrupt. They waste their labor and money on stupid shit and waste their vote on Marxists.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:27 PM
1

No. The difference between insurance and collectivism is actuarial science. Insurance is basically a mutant form of parimutuel gambling. The cost of buying into the pot is governed by your statistical risk of needing to collect from it. The more the state meddles with insurance, limiting the freedom to apply actuarial science, the more it becomes collectivism. Health insurance has decayed the most in this regard.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:16 PM
0

On gravel with 6" deep wheel ruts? I live in Iowa. Where 1/8th of the roads are paved.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 02:16 PM
0

Nah I just live in Iowa. I bet I've pulled myself out of more ditches than you've ever been in.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 02:11 PM
1

Most people love a new lamborghini Fifth wheel and winch where?
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 01:13 PM
1

overestimate the right to vote Franchise inflation. A vote used to be worth a lot more because there were fewer voters. the right to vote, somehow offsets the enormous sacrifices that men are expected to make The law seems to think that it is. We did lower the voting age from 21 to 18 explicitly because "old enough to fight and die, old enough to vote against war".
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:19 AM
3

The people who want to force conscription on women as a way of balancing the scales are the ones who want to hurt women. I don't. Of course, I feel that way because I think it's a bullshit promise we'd never keep (as if we'd ever conscript women). I'm not a sucker to fall for something that can be undone. But even putting that aside, I'm perfectly fine with a division of labor that says "Men get to vote but have to fight, women are protected from war but don't have a vote". I don't see how that'…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:42 AM
1

And why is that?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:33 AM
1

You tell me. How do you take an unearned vote away from 51% of the voting population?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:32 AM
0

As in the dissolution of the union. The constitution, having been interpreted to grant franchise to everyone, while selectively placing an obligation on some, cannot be reinterpreted to deny it. We cannot and will not extend that obligation to all, as a society that genuinely expects the same obligation of women as it expects of men is a society that will not survive its first war; more likely a society that promises to do so will later reinstitute the double standard as soon as the first moment…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:18 AM
-4

Absolutely fuck all. Because there's nothing to be done for it except secession.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:05 AM
15

Republicans and Republican leaning independents make up ~41% of the population of the country. Higher than the ~30% of the country that seceded in the Civil War, and much higher than the 1% that fought the British in the Revolution. Many, if not most of them, own guns. My question to those who are anti-gun is... supposing they are violent people, exactly how do you see this playing out?
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 01:57 AM
49

I have added a link to some bitch yapping about how Sex and the City has ruined her generation. She is at least introspective enough to grasp what happened. That is itself a feat of intellect worthy of acknowledgement.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 01:36 AM
23

Because these people are near guns they become violent, or something like that. Simplest retort: There are roughly 90 million gun owners in the United States. Are we to believe that 90 million people in this country are violent people? That's like... what, rougly 1 in 3?
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 11:32 PM
-1

I wouldn't continue associating with someone who makes stupid decisions, ignores warnings, and still won't listen after the warnings prove to be prophetic.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 09:59 PM
1

That just follows from the whole idea being disfunctional. The MRM has NO VIABLE END GAME. There is no way to win pursuing the course of action they are attempting. They will never be more than an inconvenient nuisance to the progressives. Everyone with the intellect to grasp that finds something better to do than waste time cheering for the dunce team.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 09:42 PM
2

Do we need the mrm We do not. They are trying to fix the system by working within it, which is futile. The state has to fling itself apart in secession and civil war. That is the only way that the progressives will be stripped of their power.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 08:42 PM
20

What can we do? Vote. "NAY! Further in, we'll cut across the faster waters!" We do not have the societal deltaV available to completely reverse the damage progressivism has done to society. We only have enough to maybe speed it up, bring the collapse about sooner and then move on. Attempting to fix it working within the system, as mensrights does, simply draws out the inevitable. The whole thing will have to collapse and be remade.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 04:37 PM
4

"I AM THE EMPEROR!" -Harrison Bergeron (Kurt Vonnegut Jr) Progressivism is a religion. It can only be fought by another religion, whether it be a traditional one or a cult of personality.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 04:15 PM
2

Stop fucking helping them out. ... Because progressivism is a religion, and sooner or later we're going to have to treat it as such.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 03:30 AM
0

Elam claims that there are only around 300 "real" MRA's in the world, and that a third of them work for him? How in the fuck did he reach this conclusion? He's squirrel shit nutty is how. TBH, Viktor Orban is doing more to actually fight the progressive narrative than Paul Elam is.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 02:20 AM
2

Yes but why do you like girl?
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:30 PM
3

Melon baller Did you mean: ice cream scoop
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:26 PM
6

provides benefits such as tax breaks And why do they do that? Because new children for the perpetuation of the society. Those benefits should now be implemented entirely with dependent credits, and the married filing jointly column struck from the tables entirely.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:07 PM
2

I too read Rainbow Six. Liked the ending. Though Moonraker (and by extension, Agent Aika, because it's the same story) did it with more style.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:51 AM
1

Only because certain people are already calling "Australia Style". Which is the shortest and most certain path to civil war the progressives have ever proposed.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 01:59 AM
4

Moral hazard. Franchise should never have been granted without responsibility.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:48 PM
1

Since we'll see these arguments pop again soon, just remember... "When someone says the United States ought to adopt Australia’s gun laws as its own, he is really saying the cause of gun control is so important that he is willing to impose these laws even at the cost of violent insurrection. Make no mistake, armed rebellion would be the consequence. Armed men would be dispatched to confiscate guns, they would be met by armed men, and blood would be shed. Australia is a valid example for America …
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:59 PM
6

It really, really depends on the circumstances. If I saw a bear the first thing I'd do is take the metal cup off my pack, draw my knife and start banging them together loudly. My impression is that artificial clanging noise is more frightening than simply yelling, though I've never encountered a bear visually (I've seen one from a safe distance, and I'm confident one tried to get at my hanging food in BWCA, but I've never been close enough to be in danger). Now, I HAVE been in danger range of a …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 03:59 AM
12

Just gonna say, running isn't necessarily the best course of action where bears are concerned. The BEST course of action is to wear something loud like a bell so they hear you coming, which will almost invariably send them away long before you come into sight of them. Bears are skittish creatures and withdraw when they hear or smell potential threats approaching. It's when you happen into visual range without being detected that they become dangerous, because then it becomes about displaying thr…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 03:22 AM
-1

I'm okay with this. I have a plan. We allow refugees into Europe, but every able bodied male among them is drafted. We raise an army, we outfit and train then to our standards, and then we use them to conquer Syria. Conquer. Not liberate. Not stabilize. Conquer. All the officers and NCOs would be picked from those with wives and children taking shelter in Europe, to ensure loyalty.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:08 PM
2

No, just your money.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:01 PM
6

Well... There's some truth in it at least. There's still the condescending attitude but at least they got the sphere's major continents named correctly and in the right spots.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:18 AM
-1

What isn't believable about it? I'll tell you what's not believable... When MacGyver goes to the trouble of making a poisoned crossbow out of a ballpoint pen when he could just do the Walker Texas Ranger thing and, you know, punch the baddies.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 04:24 PM
-1

I've said it before, I don't think MsGyver would be that terrible. As long as the character is interesting and the writing is good I think there's some potential there.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 01:55 AM
0

That's democracy. The only votes that actually count are the ones that aren't cancelled out by someone else who thinks you and your ideas are bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 11:16 AM
1

Everyone in this thread saying "get rid of the draft" is either a naive idiot or a false flagger. That's the sort of bullshit promise that's forgotten at the first moment of necessity, and anyone stupid enough to fall for it has no business having franchise.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:30 PM
1

Well..... Okay if we have a spectrum of tolerance for musical numbers and on one end is The Little Mermaid and on the other end is Shrek, Tangled would definitely lean towards the Shrek side.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 05:13 PM
2

No, completely different arc. Eugene's story is classic anti-hero redemption, and Rapunzel's story is kinda hard to catagorize. There's a bit of rejecting feminist hags, but then there's the haircut thing...
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 05:06 PM
4

Well sure. I'm just sayin that of the two men in the story (Hans and Christof), the defining characteristic of both is merely honest self interest. Neither is incompetent or weak willed. Further neither starts out as an anti-hero like Eugene in Tangled.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 04:47 PM
2

I think Wreck-it-Ralph is worse about messaging even though it was a better movie. Ironcally Frozen really isn't all that bad. "But she'll die on her own. I can live with that. But then you won't get your new sled. You know I really don't like you."
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 04:21 PM
0

In real actual democracy we all actually get to vote on the actual things we want to do or not do, and who will lead. You do that today. Like I said, you simply expect too much from democracy. Read Starship Troopers. "The unlimited democracies were unstable because their citizens were not responsible for the fashion in which they exerted their sovereign authority, other than through the tragic logic of history. The unique 'poll tax' that we must pay was unheard of. No attempt was made to determi…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 11:20 AM
-1

You are mistaken. It IS democracy. The problem is YOUR expectations OF democracy. You do not account for the Tragedy of the Commons. You expect too much. Read Starship Troopers.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 01:42 AM
3

Well I don't care to explain it.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 09:31 PM
3

My point is that control of the US food supply is concentrated in the hands of a very small number of people, numbering in the thousands. They are incredibly wealthy and increasingly operate like the Japanese keiretsu. Many would sooner burn it all in spite than see it collectivized. drag races Tractor pulling is another such pasttime. (Yes, those are jet engines.)
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 02:33 PM
3

Because Paul Elam is to Roosh as Rand Paul is to Trump.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:25 AM
2

People who support welfare should fund it. Those who don't shouldn't be extorted. That is how the world used to be. It ought be that way again. End welfare. End SNAP. End the bailouts. No taxes for social assistance. No public debt for social assistance.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 03:49 AM
8

There are counties in Nebraska where 90% of the land is owned by ten or fewer landowners. These are no longer "family farms". The owning entities have become effectively feudal lords, only modestly less powerful than Walt Disney was with his Reedy Creek Improvement District (which allowed Disney World to effectively secede from Orange and Osceola County, making it subject ONLY to state and federal law). The Reagan farm recession precipitated this situation. They have become lords. Wage employees…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 03:42 AM
3

It's funny how a significant portion of the red pill sub thinks it can join the upper crust. I don't think they actually think that. I think they think that what they do accomplish will be meaningful. Which it would be. Today sloth is rewarded and diligence penalized. The housing bailout. Welfare. SNAP. These things should not exist. You don't need a Hard Times to become reality to have your accomplishments mean something. They should mean something to you regardless of what others think. No, be…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 03:20 AM
1

Don't mistake me for being sympathetic. I'm not. I'm with them. I would rather a Dickensian dystopia where my successes are meaningful and failure is something to be avoided. Because I AM successful, I worked for everything I have, harder than many. In that Dickensian world I would shine even more than I do today.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 02:50 AM
0

I would argue that it was unlimited democracy that really did the damage, because it made it inevitable that women would gain that in the first place. It created the moral hazard to broaden the electorate.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 02:21 AM
4

if we configure the economy differently Which we won't. I live in Iowa and I'll tell you: feudalism is alive and well, I've seen it, and its called Nebraska. The people who control the means of production for that 1500 kcal/day, ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT tolerate collectivism. They barely tolerate the degree of socialism we have now, and only because they get their own handouts in the Farm Bill.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 02:10 AM
10

Slavery, however inefficient and even counterproductive, serves ONE economic role. It places an artificially elevated floor on the value of a human life. Despite progressive mewling to the contrary, it is possible to put a price on human life; in fact it's impossible to not have a price. The absolute floor of the price of a human life is 1500 kcal/day. Without that, you don't have a living human, you have a dead human killed by starvation. But a slave is not useful at 1,500 kcal/day. That's just…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 10:03 PM
2

Then you need to read up on game theory. I also suggest you read Starship Troopers, because it will explain to you better how those two extremes are actually inseparable. Si vis pacem, para bellum is not just some anarchist slogan, it's applied game theory. The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:34 AM
2

No, you're being naive. Exactly how do you think you're going to pull off your changes, hmm?
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 12:44 AM
1

I present the third option Your third option ABSOLUTELY WILL mean civil war and the dissolution of the union. We cannot achieve what you want to achieve so long as women have franchise, and we cannot reinterpret the constitution to take franchise away after having used it to grant it. Now, I don't have a problem with secession, my loyalty is to Iowa. But do you?
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 12:16 AM
2

Alexander has always been a realist moderate. Things might have turned out differently if he'd beaten Bush for the nomination. He would have defeated Gore by enough to avoid the recount.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:21 PM
2

When companies win in such actions they tend to be magnanimous in victory. The deal she was offered (agree to not appeal and we'll call it square) is commonplace. They simply want the matter resolved. The money is peanuts.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:53 PM
8

modern interactive form of art Sure. But you aren't creating it. You're appreciating it. This is why I dumped online gaming and took up piano. Still a keyboard; still mashing buttons.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 12:50 PM
3

Huge shock There is a term in electrical engineering called a "pole slip". It occurs when the frequency of the grid becomes so out of phase of a spinning generator that the generator loses or gains a step relative to the grid. This causes severe torque on the generator as it momentarilly acts like a motor, being dragged by the grid's frequency until momentum forces it to slip in order to catch up (a spinning wheel cannot change its momentum as fast as the grid can change frequency). I see it as …
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:27 PM
2

Modular in the sense that if an arm breaks its a field tech reparable part. Detatch arm and attach replacement. Anyway. Yeah businesses will initially be cautious but then someone will go all in on it and undercut their bottom line.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:09 PM
3

It was just a guess. Realistically any sort of commercial robot is going to be built for longer use than two years. In the computer world, aside from magnetic drives, some systems can be supported for decades. Just as you can buy a new prewash hose without buying a new dishwasher, or a new cpu without replacing your blade server, I have no doubt commercial general robots will be modular and available with long term service plans. ... At least until the luddites come with empty stomachs, sharpene…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:21 PM
5

Paying? No. Buying yes. Its a capital investment. You're used to thinking of labor as people, but robots don't have rights. They're property. Affordability depends only on how long they'll last. I anticipate an operational lifecycle of about a decade.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:14 PM
4

...... Okay, so, you're missing a link. A general purpose anthromorphic robot has uses which will ensure eventual ubiquity, but that also sews the seeds of society's downfall into a violent dystopia where traditional paternalism will reassert out of necessity. Let us say that one unit costs a hundred thousand dollars. It can run continuously, has a two year warranty, and cannot sue. Every hotel would instantly fire their housekeeping staff and replace them with machines. Because its a good inves…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:48 PM
1

Even then that's debatable Case in point: West, Texas fertilizer explosion
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 01:21 PM
4

In a word... Momentum The law changes slowly. Tbh, I'd be fine with male only conscription if only men could vote.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:59 PM
2

I think you're mistaken. Moreover, the US does not use direct election. Even if megapolis believes the border is irrelevant, the rural states feel otherwise and the electoral college gives their votes more say.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 07:48 PM
1

secret potion Colt 45 Malt Liquor
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:26 PM
2

The comments didn't take long to start talking up Sanders...
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:17 PM
2

Hmmmm. How to put this... Your assertion "it would mean men should not have casual sex either" is internally consistent. But the power to make society be that way lies with women, not men, and women have chosen to not police other women in order to make society be that way, so it isn't that way. Does that make sense?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 12:20 AM
4

it would mean men should not have casual sex either Shrug I won't deny that you have sound reasoning there. I know some religions also took that view. But since nobody polices women's behavior to the degree that society used to, the point is moot. Women police the behavior of women and set the expectations that men follow for sex. Today, there is no expectation and basically anything a woman can possibly do is held up by women as empowering.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 01:48 PM
1

You must live in megalopolis. You see, out here in the states that like to discuss secession, things are very possibly salvageable. If we would just attempt secession, the impact doing so would have on megalopolis would be devastating. Megalopolis is the most vulnerable collection of humans to have ever lived. You learned nothing from the 2003 Northeast Blackout and Katrina.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 04:40 AM
1

I have said before that it will take war. I mean every word of it. It will take war.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 09:40 PM
1

Millions rich? Get my name on some buildings. Billions rich? Get Disney to build a park in Iowa. I don't need money, I already have enough to live fine.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 05:44 PM
54

"The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do they are still a part of that system."
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 04:08 PM
1

Boundary test Women demanding jobs was a boundary test. One which our ancestors failed miserably.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 12:32 PM
19

Well, only 1% of the colonists actually fought the English in the revolution.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 11:18 AM
6

I'm not saying it's aliens...
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:04 AM
104

It's a shit test. On a massive scale. The proper response is to undo progressivism entirely. So that crazy women like this get married off young before they become crazy.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 12:16 AM
42

refuses to go to the gym Eject. Eject now.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 05:08 PM
1

If it quacks like a duck, its a duck.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:51 PM
1

If that were to happen a number of agrarian states would secede. Either they would be allowed to leave and enact massive tariffs impoverishing the megalopolis, or they would fight, destroying production capacity and starving the megalopolis. The people in my state are already furious about wealth transfer to what we perceive as useless people on the coast who vote for policies we don't like. Do not underestimate the populist dislike of communism.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:00 PM
1

So how would your system deal with inflation? I get what you're saying, but GMI won't work without price controls, or a Cuban style monopoly money. Which is what WIC and SNAP kinda are today.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:38 PM
1

It doesn't works because it introduces waste. People simply do not take care of things they're given. Its why public housing failed. I raised slavery as a point because it, like communism, places a floor. But it does so in a way that is compatible with capitalism rather than inimical to capitalism.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:09 PM
1

I won't deny that it would make a material impact on the lives of those workers, but soon more of them won't have jobs. Whereever practical and cost effective people are replaced. Tech keeps making more things practical to automate, and climbing labor costs make more things cost effective to automate. Once we have people who are surplus, unneeded in the economy, we can only appropriate from others to sustain them. This is communism and it infuriates those who work.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:25 PM
1

The problem isn't culture. Our economy is very good at wringing efficiency. Its literally why robots are overtaking people. We don't have the abundance to give people an existence they didn't earn, and we don't need enough people for everyone to be able to earn an existance. Going into the accounts Okay, stop it. You are one of those people who is responding to executive compensation on feelz, not reals. If we took ALL the executive compensation of Walmart (76 million) and divided it among all t…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:24 PM
4

i think most of us aspire to live a comfortable life I don't dispute that at all. But if we live in a dystopia where we have robot McDonalds and robot housekeepers in hotels and robot groundskeepers at golf courses what else is left for the teeming masses of unskilled to do? We're approaching a bizarre point in our economic evolution, one which Star Trek didn't anticipate. We have reached a point where labor is so expensive compared to automation that we can afford to eliminate labor, but cannot…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:31 AM
2

It's not a pretty prospect. Why not? I ask academically. Consider: all human life has a price. That price is easily quantified, it's the cost of 1500 kilocalories a day. If you can't pay that cost, you don't have a human life. Instead you have a dead human due to starvation. Slavery, ignoring all of its many negatives both moral and practical, has one peculiar effect: It puts an artificially elevated floor on the value of a human life. The life of a slave is inevitably worth more than just the f…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:13 AM
3

Whatever are you talking about? The first stone was laid in 1848, the capstone was set at the end of 1884, and it officially opened in 1888. 1888 - 1848 = 40 years. And then not only did the French build the Eiffel Tower right after it, trumping its height, but a frenchman also soon after invented a process for making cheap aluminum. Making the "precious" aluminum capstone we put on it practically worthless.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:53 AM
5

The Washington Monument isn't a symbol of oppression. It's a symbol of government dysfunction. A pointy pile of rocks that took 40 years to build. When it was finished it was the tallest structure in the world, but it was overtaken in the same decade by the Eiffel Tower, which was built in 2 years.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:08 PM
3

Finally a situation that can be explained by telling people to watch The Producers.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:37 PM
3

Men, football is war. God how I love it so.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:34 PM
6

That sign... Do you deny having a sense of agency, or are you just a hypocrite?
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:44 PM
2

I'm own that, yeah. "Some men, Mr Wayne, just want to watch the world burn."
/r/MensRights03/09/15 06:21 PM
1

The problems mensrights complains about arise from profiling using bad data and conspiracy to conceal the fact that the data is bad. I have absolutely no problem with profiling on account of accurate data.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:27 PM
1

I don't think anyone on this sub would dispute that profiling already occurs on account of gender.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:40 PM
1

Feels like Yeah well feels ain't reals. Reality is black persons commit tenfold more murders than a same gender white person, per capita. Ten times. Not twice, not ten percent... TEN FUCKING TIMES MORE.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:17 PM
1

Specifically the order of magnitude of one of them in relation to the others. "Oh it's profiling, oh it's racism..." No. It's not profiling, it's data. One segment of the population commits an order of magnitude more homocidal crimes per capita than the others.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:15 AM
1

You don't see a trend here? Hint: Look at the scale of the vertical axis of each chart...
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:13 PM
1

"Elephant in the room".
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:33 PM
1

You got any proof that the incidence rate has held constant?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:34 PM
1

If feminism did not exist, if gender relations were as they were in premodern times, if obesity was at premodern levels, the incidence rate of gender dysphoria would diminish to non existance.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:24 PM
1

All attempts to fix the mind have failed That is what I call bullshit on. There are things we don't try, because we know they'd work and the fact they'd work would have profoundly awkward implications for the feminist/progressive narrative.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:11 PM
1

If the anatomy matches the genes and the mind disagrees then the mind is in error. We fix the part that is in error. They are delusional narcissists who need to be told no. Occam's Razor In Action
/r/MensRights02/09/15 07:50 PM
2

Logic isn't belief. I have depicted how it is a violation of their hippocratic oath. It is not on me to explain why they are hypocrites. MY BELIEF which I have not previously stated because it is neither here nor there, is that psychologists are lazy or cowardly. They lack either the resolve or the desire to actually fix gender dysphoria at the mental level and instead give into the patient's fantasy. The patients running the asylum, if you will. Surgeons care little for the ethical questions or…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:19 PM
1

If the anatomy matches the genes and the mind disagrees then the mind is in error.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:56 PM
1

Bullshit. If the anatomy matches the genes and the mind disagrees then the mind is in error.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:27 PM
1

Altering the healthy body's objective reality to conform to the mind's subjective reality via surgery is playing god and thus a violation of the Hippocratic Oath. If the anatomy matches the genes then the body is not in error. The mind is. Thus the mind is what needs to be repaired.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:06 PM
1

Gender dysphoria is a psychological disorder. You do not treat psychological disorders with surgery.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:54 PM
1

A treatment for what, sir?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:13 PM
-2

If we want to stand on principle... Yes. Barring correcting injury or debilitating deformity. "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should." -Ian, Jurassic Park
/r/MensRights02/09/15 02:49 PM
-5

If the anatomy matches with the genes, you say "there's nothing physically wrong with you" and refer them to a psychologist. Then the psychologists need to do their fucking jobs instead of using surgeons as a form of wish fulfilment. "Above all, I must not play at god." -the current Hippocratic Oath
/r/MensRights02/09/15 02:01 PM
0

doctors have sworn oaths "Above all, I must not play at god." -the current Hippocratic Oath
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:54 AM
1

we have no treatment other than to accommodate what the brain wants I want a billion dollars. Make it so. Life isn't fair. So what is your proposed solution to dealing with GID? Doctors must refrain from mutilating the body to affect a superficial change in apparent gender when anatomy and genetics are in agreement.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:35 AM
-2

BULLSHIT. The parts align with the genes you are that gender. Period. If the mind disagrees the mind is in error.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:49 PM
-2

We know enough about physiology and genetics to know when the parts are correct and the mind is in error. That is enough to call it a personality disorder. We do not treat personality disorders with surgery.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:45 PM
-1

That's just not the case. Bullshit. Prove it. I'm not talking about birth defects, I'm talking about "your mind disagrees with both your anatomy and your genes". Prove that that is anything but a personality disorder. BECAUSE YOU DO NOT TREAT PERSONALITY DISORDERS WITH A KNIFE SIR.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:28 PM
-5

It's not the patient that's the problem, it's the doctor. Doctors who mutilate to treat a personality disorder are violating the Hippocratic Oath. If someone wants to entertain their own delusion, that's fine. That's classical liberalism. But when a doctor plays god to facilitate that delusion, whatever that delusion might be, that is a violation of the principles of their profession. "Above all, I must not play at God." -the current Hippocratic Oath
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:12 PM
-1

the real solution Is that you don't treat Cotard Delusion by handing the patient a gun. You don't treat Body Integrity Identity Disorder by handing the patient a saw. You don't treat Dissociative Identity Disorder by handing the patient two social security cards.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:27 PM
-7

If a cop told you to calm down you probably needed to be told it. The way to deal with the police is to channel Christopher Walken reading the phonebook.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:24 PM
0

I would have paid good money to sit in on that discovery conference. "Nevah know what hit 'em."
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:37 PM
1

What issue are people going to make huge sacrifices and go to war for? Money. "Above all things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony. Besides, pretexts for taking away the property are never wanting; for he who has once begun to live by robbery will always find pretexts for seizing what belongs to others." -The Prince, Nicolo Machiavelli millions of jobs paid for with federal funding Most of …
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:18 AM
2

In short, the welsh suck.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:08 AM
1

What state do you live in? Because I'm guessing you've never been to mine. You've probably flown over it, if you've flown from one coast to the other, but I doubt you've ever set foot in it. I don't see it as a revolution. I see it as my state, among others, saying "FUCK YOU, WE DON'T FEED YOUR ASSES SO YOU CAN TAX US FOR YOUR SOCIAL PROGRAMS AND YOUR UNRESTRICTED ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION." It won't be a march against DC or the coastal cities. It'll just be rural agrarian states ejecting federal agen…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:45 PM
2

You're half right. The world doesn't work that way anymore, and that's why it WILL be a civil war. There is no outside aggressor who cares enough about territory to fight over a physically remote continent. It will be a civil war because our differences matter more than territory now.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 09:15 PM
-1

Prove your manhood Tá mé ó albain Accepted, door on your left. Prove your manhood Tá mé ó Éirinn Accepted, door on your left. Prove your manhood ff mod yn dod o gymru GET THE FUCK OUT!
/r/MensRights31/08/15 09:00 PM
29

What I find surprising is that men are also consistently better than women in chess. Its lookahead. Women do not think strategically. Whether it's ten years or ten minutes. It's why they can't figure out that feminism ultimately impedes them from getting what they want.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 02:30 PM
1

No state lasts forever. Thinking otherwise is hubris.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:36 AM
1

Okay let's clarify it: The Department of Defense is only really good at massive bombardment. Because everything you listed is done by the Department of State.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:50 PM
1

In fact we make feminism look silly for getting mad at things like Well yes. However, here's were things get complicated... AS BAD AS things are over there, they get worse every time we try to make things better. The United States is only really good at one kind of warfare and that's massive bombardment. Congress, and honestly, the voters, are fine with us using cargo planes to hit Islamistani cities with technically-not-nukes. We'd rather flatten cities than lose a single person trying to pacif…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:44 PM
2

Got a primer on this? Starship Troopers. Read it. It's on the required reading list at 4 of the 5 US military academies.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 07:05 PM
2

Incarcerating hundreds of thousands of men. Running fascist kangaroo courts of public opinion. Using higher education to short circuit the judiciary. Enshrining a legal policy that obliges law enforcement to deprive men of their children regardless of circumstances. "For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury" -The Declaration of Independence Making me carry a draft card to vote and receive social security, while they are exempt. Voting for politicians who endorse policies t…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:21 PM
0

We cannot undo the damage done by feminism so long as women have unlimited franchise free from responsibility. Any gains we make will be short lived because they have the sympathy of the legislature and the judiciary. They have the means to buy off or destroy any man we could raise to power who would oppose feminism. Further, the constitution, once having been interpreted to grant franchise to women, cannot be reinterpreted to deny it. I do not "want" war. I want a peaceful dissolution of the st…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:54 PM
-2

Donald Trump Because the only way things will get better is with through a civil war and I'd rather provoke the progressives into being the ones who secede first.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 03:58 PM
1

Reiterating a response I just made in another thread on a similar question... There is no point in attempting to redress our grievances through the ballot box. Any men's rights friendly candidate we got into office who wasn't a eunuch would be "bought" in the way Zoe Quinn bought coverage. Feminists are the Bene Gesserit. They will fuck their way to the people in power in order to control them if they have to. No man we elected could be depended upon to remain incorrupt. This is assuming of cour…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:12 AM
1

No. That will not work. Because they can they can get to them. They can do the Bene Gesserit thing and fuck their way to any such men we put in power who aren't eunuchs. They have the "currency" buy them and control them. We cannot change the system working within the rules of the system.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:03 AM
0

They have control of the legislature and the judiciary.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 12:21 AM
6

The conspiracy is that no, there really isn't. It's just fucking obvious that it increases spending and thus tax revenue. Like saying "the duluth model is sexist". Well, yeah, it is. The state is against us. "Unfortunately, the Confederate authorities are fully committed to a different policy; in fact, to a very stilted style of waging war. In every aspect the situation is embarrassing." -General 'Stonewall' Jackson, letter to Captain Barringer, 1861
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 10:34 PM
11

"So how did you know he was lying?" "Well the odds were good that he was lying about something. Liars are always afraid that somebody is going to see through them. So, I just provided him with a vehicle for his paranoia." -Bester, Babylon 5
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:11 PM
2

Uhhhh....so you're a SJW? PROPOSITIONAL FALLACY, AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT. TEN YARD PENALTY.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:28 PM
2

Nonsense. The SJWs just want us to stop using it because they like the musical.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:42 PM
3

You were born a man; in our society, this means you were born 24601. So long as Javert runs the society, you will never be Jean Valjean. There is only one option.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:46 PM
1

You're still being reductive. Femininity as a product is about more than just sex. If that's how you view women, I'm glad I'm not you.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:09 PM
1

In an efficient market if the price went up on a product due to demand alone a competitor would edge in and drive the price down. Which, of course, is happening. Even Cappy has seen it.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:22 PM
-1

We don't really have much of a choice. Their ideology has to be excised from its privileged status in state or the state will eventually have to be replaced. Their sexist views are incompatible with liberty.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:18 PM
-3

It was feminists who decided sex was worth enough to allow them to let femininity slide. They were mistaken.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:04 PM
10

And here is what I say to feminism...
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:32 AM
1

And we're the blowhards? You seen Hunger Games? From the perspective of the midwest... You're capital. A cesspit of worthless humans who contribute nothing. You squander our prosperity on worthless bullshit. The politicians take out mountains of debt to fucking buy you off. What happened to the country's economy after 9-11? Nothing. Why? Because if the entire eastern seaboard from DC to Boston sank tomorrow taking everyone with it NOTHING OF VALUE WOULD HAVE BEEN LOST.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:01 PM
0

But they are never something to look forward to. That is your opinion. I disagree with it. I am tired of bullshit from useless blowhards on the coast.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:32 AM
-1

I have told you all repeatedly that this will not be resolved except through civil war. You all keep refusing to accept it. Eventually the white knights will have to be confronted. "We have survived by hiding from them, by running from them. But they are the gatekeepers. They are guarding all the doors, they are holding all the keys, which means that sooner or later, someone is going to have to fight them." -Morpheus Their strength is based in a world that has rules. Rules... which are mutable.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:13 PM
1

You should read the book.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:42 PM
-2

we have a democratic system "To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster; to hold a man responsible for anything he does not control is to behave with blind idiocy. The unlimited democracies were unstable because their citizens were not responsible for the fashion in which they exerted their sovereign authority . . . other than through the tragic logic of history. The unique 'poll tax' that we must pay was unheard of. No attempt was made to determine whether a voter was socially respons…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:26 PM
1

I have been given the "fusion is 30 years away", "mars is 30 years away", "warm superconductivity is 30 years away" bullshit for THIRTY FUCKING YEARS. Shit is going to go down and the dreams of utopia are going to burn away just like the ending of the XX century in Heinlein's Starship Troopers. It'll start in Europe. Specifically Germany. The influx of refugees is going to snap their patience and violent nationalism will rise again.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:23 PM
0

This is true. "And that is why you fail." -Yoda What you desire you will never get by asking. Only by taking.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:56 PM
2

Are there ways? Depends. What are you prepared to do? "Everything within the law." "And then what are you prepared to do?" Ya'll call me crazy when I say this will end in civil war, but it will sooner or later. Once enough ya'll have been ruined to the point where you're willing to risk it all for a chance at something better. Once ya'll stop needing the approval of others and just want justice at any cost. Once the results of the low road become more appealing than being able to pat yourself on…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:49 PM
3

overturned No. You don't parlay with a wicked state. You simply replace the state.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:35 PM
-3

During the American occupation of Germany, the guiding principle of that occupation was that the meek have no claim to innocence. That they had an obligation to fight and perhaps die opposing the regime we ultimately had to topple for them. That the innocent died long before. The shirkers and cowards, who claim it isn't their fight, who flee to Europe or play along in silence... will be cut down alongside the wicked when Israel does what ISIS will eventually force Israel to do.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:40 AM
2

Not "like another". Just another. Not "for men's rights" Just for liberty. This is much bigger than men's rights, or gamergate, or the hugos, or comedians... it gets right down to the fact that our entire government is a parliament of whores presiding over a bureaucracy that has become an end unto itself. Protected by a press and a feminist community that is contented with its outer party privilege of status whoring.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:16 PM
1

Should we make a petition? You do that. Look, things are not going to get better until they get so much worse. Whether it is us or a subsequent generation, someone is going to have to buy liberty again with blood.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:10 PM
2

And then immediately change the locks. She abandoned the residence so her keys need to be made useless ASAP.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:35 PM
16

Feminist argues in favor of the Duluth model by it suggesting it is an utilitarian decision The whole point of Blackstone's Formulation is that justice cannot compromise on integrity, because once you do your problems multiply. "It is more important that innocence should be protected, than it is, that guilt be punished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world, that all of them cannot be punished.... when innocence itself, is brought to the bar and condemned, especially to die, the sub…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:17 AM
3

Women officers often wind up being used as... token woman on shift. Kinda like having an animal control officer, or an identification officer, or the county medical examiner. Any given shift most of the officers out in cars are going to be men and when they encounter a situation that requires a female officer, they call one to the scene which they already have under control. Most non-collision violent deaths of police officers occur during the first contact, when an officer may be unsupported an…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:35 AM
1

"What do Americans think of Canada? We don't. No really you can tell us. We don't. Like, as long as we don't run out of lumber you're safe." -Jon Stewart
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 03:47 AM
0

You Iowans are nothing special. We sent more people per capita to the Civil War than any other state, on either side. Including the only full regiment of graybeards. We're the ONLY state in the union to have declared hostilities against another state, outside of the civil war, over territory, and TO HAVE SECURED AND GAINED said territory (which is why the southeast corner extends into Missouri). Forget melange... we're the world's largest producer of bacon. The slice must flow.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 11:24 PM
0

To the other commenters saying "not all men are like that", go fuck yourselves For the record I didn't say "not all are", I said "I'm not". It's my fervent belief that Iowans, with our hundred degree difference between high and low average temps... are like the fukking Fremen. "God created Arrakis to train the faithful."
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 11:13 PM
4

I fixed my dishwasher today and then ate an apple I grew in my own damn orchard. That is, after a morning at the state fair where I won two ribbons and shook hands with a soon to be drop-out candidate for the presidency. You have only yourself to blame for your mediocrity.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 10:09 PM
4

Uhura: "Rura Penthe?" Chekov: "Known throughout the galaxy as the aliens' graveyard." Scotty: "Better to kill 'em now and get it over with."
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:49 AM
8

I've gone before. My precinct is rich, not stupid.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 11:57 PM
10

I am caucusing for Trump.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 10:32 PM
8

Feminism depends on the assumption that sexism is bad.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:18 PM
7

Its illustrating your point about sexism. Is the duluth model sexist? Yes. Its sexist.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:51 PM
10

it assumes men are always Which is sexist. the civil war wasn't about slavery, it was about states rights A state's right to do WHAT, sir?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:44 PM
1

What will the next 40 years look like? GRIMDARK RACEWAR
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:35 PM
14

Explain the duluth model The assumption that men are always at fault for domestic violence. Explain what is wrong with the duluth model It's sexist. Also, it ignores that most domestic violence is reciprocal.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:22 PM
0

I hate living in Sweden sometimes Only sometimes? You have crummy speech and gun rights. Most of your women are either fat, pierced, or islamic. You're being conquered at a glacial pace because your government is hamstrung by its own dogoodiness. Your only exports are guns, flatpack furniture, and one size of metric hex wrench. Texas in Sweden would have seceded by now.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:40 PM
-2

Prison itself is the problem. Incarceration simply isn't as effective as corporal punishment. Burn the prisons and lash everyone who doesn't merit a noose.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:09 PM
19

Are you in America? If so, laugh and walk away. As long as you aren't being libelous or making implied (or explicit) threats, its protected.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:32 PM
0

If that goes over your head then I have to think you can't be old enough to remember the Bush vs Gore debates when the press joked Al had the whole tree. It means you're straightlaced and obnoxiously preachy about it.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:57 PM
1

I'm going to take the stick up your ass as a sign that you're projecting. ... Freudianly. I've never heard of the poem you speak of. But I HAVE heard the phrase used in meeting (I'm quaker) as a shorthand for the accumulated sayings of Proverbs.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:07 PM
1

Whoever spares the rod hates their children. Proverbs 13:24 (NIV) Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell. Proverbs 23:14 (KJB)
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 04:51 PM
1

Spare the rod, spoil the child.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 03:16 PM
12

It will take civil war. There is a term in electrical engineering that approximates the situation we face today. Its called a pole slip. A pole slip is an extremely bad situation where the rotor of an electrical generator gets so much out of phase that it loses or gains a cycle relative to the oscillation of the grid it is attached to. This causes sudden and severe reversals in torque on the prime mover as the spinning parts fight momentum. The cause of a pole slip is never the generator itself,…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:28 PM
5

Trump isn't richer than 99.9% of women because he's a man. It's because he took risks (and when they didn't pan out, he used bankruptcy law to bully his creditors).
/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:41 AM
1

Only the people you shouldn't be listening to or acknowledging in the first place. We have the power.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:36 PM
-1

I knew India had the bomb but I never imagined they'd use it on themselves.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:25 AM
0

Sure. It cannot be stopped while preserving continuity of the state. Our constitution denies us the tools necessary to fix this problem.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:11 AM
1

Not my first rodeo. Hell, not even my first rodeo today, what with the state fair being in town.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:05 AM
2

I'm pretty sure Putin wouldn't be endorsing Thomas Paine.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:01 AM
1

As if.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:53 AM
1

I think you're just annoyed that I won the point about the exercise of natural rights. Go read Thomas Paine, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:24 AM
1

Pfffth. Consider the exercising of the natural right of secession. A state secedes. The state they seceded from, initiates war. The seceding state wins said war. What good was the law, eh?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:14 AM
1

Wrong. That concept was struck down after the Civil War. Your logic is over 200 years out of date. Wrong. It is merely a statement of hubris on the part of the state, a promise that any attempt at secession would be met with resistance by the state. It does not and cannot deny the natural right. Nothing can deny a natural right.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:03 AM
1

Secession is a natural right. No law can deny it because it is the rejection of the authority that purports to make such a law. Such a law is merely an assurance that secession chances war. It makes no statement about the seceding state, it is merely an expression of the hubris of the state they are seceding from.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:54 PM
1

You seem to be absolving the state of any responsibility in the matter of war and secession. Let us say for hypothesis that Iowa was to announce its secession from the union. The federal government can respond to this in two ways: Okay, laters Like hell you are Your interpretation puts the entire responsibility of any war that should ensue as a result of secession on the party that secedes. But this is false. The guilt of war rests on the party that shoots first. That to me is non-violence. Not …
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:35 PM
1

I'm quaker. Agitating is what we do.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:49 PM
1

I don't dispute that a civil war would entail a lot of violence. I'm disinclined to start one. I just think it's inevitable, because half the country, myself included, hates the other half and vice versa. I also think it's the only way that the damage wrought by feminism will ever be fixed. For my part I'm quite content to peacefully be angry at half the country until people much crazier than myself decide in large numbers that they hate them more. I am confident that this will happen in my life…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:35 PM
1

I don't recall saying anything to that effect.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:24 PM
1

So I was right. You have the chorfish belief that secession is an impossibility. That the United States is eternal. Nothing is eternal.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:21 PM
1

So you're from Minnesota then. Just as bad as New York.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:40 PM
1

I live in the Midwest, Iowa. Where?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:29 PM
1

You have no concept of how angry the midwest is at both coasts right now. People on the coast sit in their cities and wonder "how the fuck are Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump doing so well"? It's because the midwest will throw behind anyone who looks crazy enough to defy the entrenched bureaucracy and shake things up.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:23 PM
1

No, and you dilute the meaning of the word by suggesting that it is.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:13 PM
8

society act like It's not society. It's women. All women... hate all other women. Particularly women more attractive than themselves. Much of the policing in society is simply women trying to maintain a high price on sexuality, for their own gain. They want to regulate what other women get to show off, because it's basically a war between all women for the attention and resources of men.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 08:09 PM
1

Bottom line, if the market economies of the western world collapse .... There will arise a Caesar. Or secession. If there's blood in the water, something will smell it. Texas in particular is almost certain to secede if the country begins to collapse. They're electrically isolated from the rest of the continent (they are, google texas interconnection) and even establishing their own gold depository.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:09 AM
1

I came to the realization a while ago that there is no way to preserve continuity of the state and fix the damage feminism has wrought upon the society. They are mutually exclusive goals. The damage cannot be fixed without depriving women of franchise, and that cannot be achieved while preserving the state. The constitution, once so interpreted as granting women franchise, cannot be reinterpreted to deny it. So the daunting problem becomes the state, not feminism. There are two ways this can end…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:14 AM
1

I wholeheartedly agree, but I go even further than that. I would prefer to live in Heinlein's Terran Federation in Starship Troopers, where there is no incarceration. A crime is either worth execution (kidnapping, murder, rape, hostage taking, treason, etc) or it's not. If it's not, then its dealt with via flogging in the town square. They take the view that either a person can be rehabilitated by quick, severe punishment, or they cannot and must be removed from society.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:10 AM
6

You should have given up before the conversation started. Enjoy the decline.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:22 PM
1

Won't outsell McLintock!. "And I am not intoxicated. Yet."
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:27 PM
2

Weak. Troll harder. The thing is, this really is the red pill response to what feminism has done to society.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:16 PM
2

Enjoy the decline, man. I feel only pity at the waste of it all. Now the whole society is going to fall apart and nothing will stop it. Nor should we try. Feninists chose this, even if they didn't know. "I don't have to save you." -Batman "And I will whisper, No." -Rorschach
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:42 PM
2

Anger? As I said, the avalanche has already begun. Feminism has already planted the seeds of its own destruction. The wheel turns.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:32 PM
3

Feminism delenda est
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:16 PM
2

Feminism delenda est
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:09 PM
1

Feminism delenda est
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:06 PM
–

Feminism delenda est
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:03 PM
–

Oh, I know my worth. I'm worth much more than I can get in this SMP. I deserve better than to be screeched at about imagined problems and illusory slights. Like Frankenstein's monster, or King Kong, I have done no wrong but exist, and for that they come with torches and biplanes. They bring war upon me and I am not a saint nor Ghandi. "Wrong us, shall we not revenge?" -The Merchant of Venice, William Shakespear "The man who makes me his enemy shall be the guilty party." -Julius Caesar
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:56 PM
1

It was their choice, and they chose. "The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote." -Kosh, Babylon 5
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:50 PM
1

That is the general idea, yes. The wheel will turn and the people in power today yelling "rape culture" will eventually find out that, no, in fact things were pretty good back when they were yelling "rape culture" today.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:19 PM
-3

The wheel always turns.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:30 PM
7

She needs to be Feminism: Fuck tracks, we'll steer the train.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/15 02:59 PM
24

Well, I dunno if you're in business, but you're certainly not in writing because Robert Heinlein did a much better job of explaining value in Starship Troopers.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/15 03:20 AM
6

Should every single member of that race If there was ever an actuarian who accounted for race and gender and then called it a day, their employer probably went bankrupt a day later. Zip code is more useful than race. Give me a person's age, gender, zip code, and what coverage they are buying from me, and I can give you an educated guess as to their race, education, credit history, criminal record, and whether or not their breakfast cereal has "bran" in its name.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 08:42 PM
8

Anyone else disgusted Work for an insurance company. Nope. Actuarial science is actually the most honest expression of capitalism. They use profiling to assign a cost to your risk. In so doing they get everyone the best deal they can safely afford to provide. We could flatten the costs, remove the science from it, but all that does is drive out all the low risk people. Prices go up, insured counts go down, companies leave.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:21 PM
1

Meninist Damn luddite heretics, rejecting Morrow and science and currency.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:49 PM
2

Oh, Canada...
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:30 PM
4

Firstly, given how you changed the object a couple times I'm thinking you're a concern troll. However... On the off chance that you're not... if you're as introspective as you seem to be I don't think intelligence is your problem. You just need practice. TRP requires developing a healthy disregard for others. Focusing on yourself first. That kind of thinking can be quite alien initially. The most dangerous intellect is one that has great capacity to introspect and empathize, but also the will to…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 02:08 AM
1

The first job that will fall to the mass production general purpose bipedal anthropomorphic automaton... Is housekeeping. Walking roombas. Every hotel, everywhere, will fire their housekeeping staff and use robots. Shortly thereafter will be groundskeeping.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:50 AM
6

So being a female is a unique background? You know in 1st Edition "Elf" and "Dwarf" were classes...
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:30 AM
2

Women should get married at 16-21 (the US age of consent should be lowered to jive with most of Europe). Men should get married at 25-35. Simply telling people to get married earlier across the board doesn't solve the problem. We have to discard the foolish and recent fantasy that women and men should marry at the same point in life out of the same age group. Men generally have not established themselves as providers at the age women should become mothers.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 08:23 PM
2

Were the legal atmosphere conductive to it, I'd want to be a father. But we've made effective fathering illegal. So, whelp...
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:35 PM
1

housewifing layabout You... Were sent to childcare, weren't you? I don't believe in childcare; and I have no faith in the public school system. No, practical housewifery to me means being capable of teaching K-8 to 1-3 children better than a collection of "professional" teachers can, while still running a house.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:27 PM
7

Soon now, very soon, someone (maybe Roosh?) will get the idea of opening a middle class finishing school. That teaches practical housewifery, and how to use dating sites to get married, and how to preserve a marriage. When it happens feminism will just... collapse.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:26 AM
1

Probably about as hostile as it gets before random acts of violence. Gonna point out that this is the traditional definition of "tolerance". The divide between tolerance and intolerance is simply whether or not the community respects your rights of person and property (by not being violent). To expect more than this is to expect hegemony, which certain minorities in the US do expect today. Demanding hegemony always eventually ends poorly. History and religion (and even the daily news) both are r…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/15 01:52 PM
3

Mmmmmm nope. Go watch Snow White and then Tangled. Oh and then The Little Mermaid. Feminism is basically that. Older women hating younger women and all men. Now, as for how it will play out... sooner or later, society will tire of the bullshit and snap, and feminism will end the way the movie McLintock! ended. Or at least, that would be the best outcome. More likely society will TRY to do that and a bunch of white knights will go all "THE FEMINISTS WERE RIGHT ABOUT PATRIARCHY" and we'll have a c…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 11:13 PM
3

Instantly? No, I agree, not without a trigger incident. But prices are inflated and there is nowhere near enough liquidity for everyone to get out the door so we ARE primed for a collapse.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 04:19 AM
5

Things can become far, far worse than they are now. WILL Between now and the election we're going to see another collapse in finance. This one will be the worst of BOTH 2001 and 2008 in one go (look at the IXIC and quake in terror). Ironically though it will have minimal impact on the election, with people who blame the democrats as the last presidency equally balanced against those who depend on handouts. It doesn't really matter who gets elected because all that's left now is to wait until the…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 11:48 PM
1

Stop paying the ag subsidies and it will. Civil wars don't happen just because of nutters in compounds. They occur when the government steps on property rights and other levels of government intervene. As in the case of the Bundy Ranch standoff, which the federal government lost.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:33 PM
1

Uh... You ever been to Utah? Actually let's figure out just how in the dark you are... Which state do you live in? Thinking the way you do, I'm gonna guess it's one that doesn't get much in the way of agriculture subsidies.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:16 PM
1

People aren't equal, and life isn't fair.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:04 PM
0

No, a few red states have nukes. If you think that the national guards of Nebraska, Colorado, North Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming don't have emergency plans of action filed away to seize and hold the silos in a crisis, you're an idiot. Sooner or later there will be another civil war, between those who would tell others how to live, and those who would prefer not to be told. Our nuclear arsenal resides as far as possible from the progressive enclaves. Out of the reach of those most inclined to use…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:35 PM
17

Traditional religion was based on red pill knowledge, applied to the purpose of achieving stability, rather than maximum individual gain.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 08:42 PM
2

Is killing you Uh.... The fastest growing segment of the world population, the only one experiencing exponential growth, is the fukkin amish (and boy do they ever).
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:12 PM
3

Because it will take a civil war and revolution. Women must be deprived of franchise again in order to achieve a balance of power in society and that cannot be done while preserving continuity of the state. "Fight? Against that? No! We will run. And we will live." -Braveheart Things will have to get a lot worse, a lot more people will have to be martyred, and some state is going to have to violently secede. Whether it be Utah, or Texas, or Alaska... some state is going to have to stand up, say "…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 10:04 PM
24

Thoughts? "Our political leadership in Richmond is too timid to face the reality of this coming war. They should look to the bible. It is FULL of such wars." -General 'Stonewall' Jackson
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 05:40 PM
1

Its really quite simple. The grievances we have with the state will never be fixed until women are deprived of franchise. That... Will not happen while preserving continuity of the state, it just won't. Sooner or later, there will be war, and when it comes the money of the state being deposed will be worthless.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:45 PM
-1

raising money To what end? The grievances we have against the state will not be settled without revolution and war. What good to us is money issued and backed by the state we must oppose?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:08 PM
8

We just don't have bat shit insane women (and manginas.Well some of that.) Swing and a miss. You have Sweden and Norway. Oh, and Spain; with it's automatic arrest-the-man laws. In the United States we do at least still have some semblance of due process.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 09:11 PM
14

we have divorce rape Then you have third wave feminism. Just like America has a progressive party that calls itself liberal.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 08:17 PM
-2

Look, I'm not gonna sugarcoat this. Shit will not change, particularly in England, until the people point guns at the state and say "No."
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:53 PM
-9

What can I do Oh, so now the government is tyranical? But George III was just a great guy who farted rainbows, eh? Fix it yourselves. Protip: if you don't have guns, well, that would probably be a good starting point. Also ammunition. Very important, the one isn't much use without the other.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:06 PM
2

Because western feminism is a price fixing cartel.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:24 PM
3

I don't care. Hawking would say that everything you do is recorded all the time unless you happen to be in a black hole. Maybe even then.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 04:09 AM
1

"It should be repealed." Then declare it unfukingconstitutional. You know, that power the courts gave themselves in Marbury v. Madison.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:27 PM
1

Largely did not exist in Iowa. Ever. Seriously, we were among the last states founded before the war and most of the population was Quaker. John Brown did a lot of his recruiting here. Then when the war started we sent more people per capita than any other state, north or south. Most were Quakers, answering the London Yearly Meeting's call to end racial oppression. Iowa: treating everyone with dignity before it was cool.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:53 PM
0

On the contrary. Pretty much every black person I know (including my neighbor) bemoans how the great society actively destroyed all the progress blacks had made between reconstruction and the start of the cold war. In place of some institutionalized racism, now we have a system that actually incentivizes shitty, irresponsible behavior at the expense of others (and on top of that, is still racist). But then, I live in Iowa.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:40 PM
6

Create a stronger society Cannot be done while preserving the state. To fix the problems with society we have to acknowledge that things went off the rails when we gave women franchise.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 06:30 PM
0

This is not a great argument It doesn't have to be a great argument. Just popular. Besides, when you get down to the hard economic math, racial income disparity was better in the past than it is now. LBJ's great society failed hard.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:54 PM
1

Violence is a problem "WRONG! CONAN! What is best in life?" "To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women." It is no more complicated then that.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 11:52 AM
1

You can try to be positive, but I've read too much about Rome. It's gonna end in fire.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 03:36 AM
8

You do support feminism, don't you? Nope. I'd rather see men be men and women be women. Majority of people were happy with that way back when, and majority would be happier then they are now if it was that way again. Needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Right now we're just an unhappy society where unwomanly women are stuck with unmanly men.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:44 AM
2

I'm just gonna say that in Iowa, the CSRU has the legal authority to demand genetic material from a child over the objection of the custodial parent. The parent disputing child support pays a fee of $450, and the state collects all relevant samples and sends it for testing. If genetic relation is disproven (95% certainty is the cutoff), then the fee is refunded.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 10:30 PM
4

B) Violence is bad You have done neither. Actually I have, long ago. But I'll let Robert Heinlein explain... "Anyone who clings to the historically untrue and thoroughly immoral doctrine that violence never settles anything I would advise to conjure up the ghosts of Napoleon Bonaparte and the Duke of Wellington and let them debate it. The ghost of Hitler could referee and the jury might well be the Dodo, the Great Auk, and the Passenger Pigeon. Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in h…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 02:55 PM
5

Doesn't matter, it doesn't change the course of action. To get to the women who are doing the raising of white knights, to raise a new generation of children according to traditionalism and paternalistic values, you must still first go through the white knights and the state. There is no victory scenario that does not involve either secession or revolution. The state has embraced feminists ideas and will never be dissuaded by any evidence. "Our political leadership in Richmond is too timid to fa…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 02:16 PM
13

Women owe men sex Not as such no. That view ascribes to women the full burden of agency to grant or deny, something which TRP rejects (that women have equal faculty to men for the mental exercise of agency). A more accurate statement is that men owe it to women to lead; and as part of leading, to slap down silly and dangerous ideas such as feminism when they first appear, rather then a century later. We men unwisely entertained the delusion of equal agency, even going so far as to exploit it for…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 04:46 AM
44

Nothing we didn't already know. What's left is what everyone refuses to accept... that ultimately the problem is the white knights. If all men were onboard with the message that women actually need patriarchal society, then we would have it. Many aren't, and they are utterly convinced that they are in the right so SOONER OR LATER it will mean war. Actual war, and the replacement of the state. Because the white knights believe that they have the righteous moral high ground, and they will back wha…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 10:32 PM
7

Women can't get special treatment Bullshit. The GIA has a long and storied history of using femme fatales whenever they can recruit them, for the very reason that they are incredibly effective. They ascend the ranks faster and they're better at sowing discord. They're also often casually dismissed as suspects for theft and comms tapping.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 01:13 AM
2

and then have it all blow up in family court No. What's a guy to do? Jefferson was very clear. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." If you feel the family courts are tyrannical, the course of action is clear. You assemble, you march, and you give them the choice of abdicating their power by choice or by force.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:53 PM
1

We're never going to convince masses of hardcore feminists to switch sides. I think we should focus on the undecideds. You've managed to miss the point entirely. We cannot win without tearing down feminism, without storming the Bastille. Tearing down feminism does not mean "persuading". Not in the polite sense anyway. It means... "Here I bid farewell to peace and outraged justice. It is thee, O Fortune, whom I follow. Away with treaties! Let us surrender to destiny. Let war be our judge!" -Juliu…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:40 PM
3

Well, I guess you just need to watch Karen's latest video. Elam has been involved so long that he does not waste time trying to sugarcoat. We cannot win without tearing down feminism, without storming the Bastille.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:03 PM
1

"Like veal, only babies."
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:43 PM
4

Are you french? Because your posting seems french. Specifically ubisoft-french, in that its got too much exposition leading up to a shit ending.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 02:43 PM
5

Why do you think Why? Because they're rank hypocrites, that's why. Its no more complex than that. Bdsm is the zenith of objectification.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 01:20 PM
51

Without cleansing itself a little, Reddit will continue on its current course: a petri dish for the web’s dullest, dumbest impulses, a lowest common denominator clearinghouse of lazy memes, stolen porn, casual racism, a recruiting ground for hate groups, and an overall bummer. Because Reddit is a place for cowards, run by cowards afraid to take responsibility for the machine they engineered, populated by cowards who won’t reckon with the adult world around them. Sure. And you can either preside …
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:58 AM
3

I have no problem with any of that aside from redistribution (no redistribution!) though banning no fault divorce again would be an easier first step.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:57 PM
1

If there was any truth to that boast you wouldn't be asking us for an argument. Showing creationism to be purely based on a leap of faith is not hard.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:00 PM
1

And I've read an awful lot of history. Sooner or later this will end in bloodshed between us and the white knights. There must be war. God wills it.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:51 PM
1

I know it is possible to get through No. Well yes but no. You have to alter the equation. If you make the choice as binary as "cake or death" then yes, its very easy to get through to women. But otherwise, no.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:44 PM
-4

Christian Grey breaking into the lumberjack song. I didn't want to do this. I didn't want to be a billionaire sadist software mogul with a pilots license. I wanted to be, a lumberjack. Leaping from tree to tree...
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 01:03 PM
2

How would that case be resolved? Easy. Unless the infringer is claiming a fair use defense, explicit written permission is required and the burden is on them to prove that they obtained it. The burden of proof doesn't fall quite the same way in a copyright case. The plaintiff generally has no difficulty establishing that infringement OCCURRED and pinning it to the defendant. It's the defendant who has to explain that infringement.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:22 AM
2

Whatever floats their boat, it's their sub.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:25 AM
3

It's the effect of newspeak. People don't get comedy anymore.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:55 PM
14

"We must remember always that accusation is not proof, and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law." -Edward R. Murrow, See it Now (CBS), March 9th, 1954
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:34 PM
5

Oi, don't go pushing your meiosis on every organism, bigots.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:00 PM
3

They vote me down because my solution is to be as visciously realtalk as people were in the '80s.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:10 PM
1

Sure maybe. But the way we have to run it is decidely more Willy Wonka. "IT'S ALL THERE BLACK AND WHITE CLEAR AS CRYSTAL. YOU LOSE. GOOD DAY MA'AM."
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 04:25 PM
20

But they could And would sleep that night too. They all have the mental capacity to blow up a relationship and justify doing it.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 04:20 PM
1

Well, that's the thing, history is continuous. During the '80s, liberal progressives were absolutely radioactive. Reagan won reelection by the biggest landslide in US history, carrying every state but Minnesota. Liberalism was wrecked. During the '90s political correctness ruled the scene and it started to become not okay to say certain things. During these years, the sex negative and sex positive feminists had a shadow war on campuses which saw sex positivity win intellectually only to lose mos…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:15 PM
3

Not as easy as it once was to be a feminist Uh.... Back in the '80s it was a derogatory. Comics could regularly get away with using it as such in newsprint.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:58 PM
4

She's trying to run a "Bill + Opus", Everything for Everybody campaign, and its just not going to work because people know its bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:43 PM
2

Its prophetic. They're walking away from the facebook.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:07 PM
1

The theory that Hillary had an affair with Webb Hubble is not new. But nobody has ever made it stick.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 12:54 PM
0

If you believe that, you're an entitled idiot who has never been poor, and you've never lived outside of a city. I live in walking distance of the fukkin AMISH. I've never met people more earnest and quite frankly, happy, than they are, and they CHOOSE to live like people lived about two centuries ago. Living in Iowa has taught me that for life to be meaningful, it has to be hard. Suffering IS the source of happiness and sanity. Its why you idiots in the megacities pop pills all the fuck time. "…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:17 AM
-1

How so? Is it not true? Was there no social safety net for our ancestors? Did the state give your distant ancestors debit cards simply for being poor? Fuck no. The state said "fuck you, work for it". Clearly they did, because you're alive today. They probably weren't overweight. Statistics say you probably are. They probably weren't divorced. Statistics say you probably are.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:32 AM
1

Having no social safety net worked for the VAST majority of recorded human history, and 2/3rds of the history of the United States. Since we've had it things have been going to shit.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:18 AM
0

And I have two strong words for you.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:10 PM
-2

I'm using the definition of capitalism as it existed prior to the Depression. The New Deal and everything that followed was socialism. I have ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM with a Dickensian America ruled the robber barons. There should be NO WELFARE. NO MEDICARE. NO TARP. NO WIC. NO SNAP. NO SOCIAL SECURITY. NO PELL GRANTS. NO STAFFORD LOANS. NO FHA. NO FREDDY MAC OR FANNIE MAE. NO FARM CREDIT SERVICE. NO NONE NOTHING GIVING MONEY TO PEOPLE JUST BECAUSE THEY NEED IT. PERIOD. The America that was before …
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:09 PM
-1

Like I said, it's women doing it. If you don't like it go try and convince them.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:18 PM
3

structural racism exists throughout he US Of course it does. Particularly with HUD back when it was breaking up neighborhoods. IT WAS THE DEMOCRATS THAT CHAMPIONED THAT. Now they want the black vote. THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MINUTE. Do they really give a fuck about blacks? No. They don't. They just want to win. that's a pretty shitty suggestion to give someone Yeah it is. Life sucks. Life isn't fair. You're not promised anything aside from eventually dying. But the point of the United States is th…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:01 PM
-1

The United States government IS socialist. Has been since FDR. Herbert Hoover (who grew up about five blocks from where I grew up), was the last upstanding free market president this country had.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:52 PM
2

Liberty does not mean coercing those who are racist or homophobic to behave a certain way (as the Protestants and the Catholics did to each other, generally under pain of death). The United States exists because a coercive state was regarded as the greater evil. Liberty means that if you live in a place where a lot of bigoted people arbitrarily hate you, and you don't want to deal with it, then you're free to go someplace else where they don't. I recommend Iowa, we're pretty tolerant.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:35 PM
-4

No. It's Marxist because that fukking bearded bastard (Prussia deserves to burn because of Marx WAY more than it does for Hitler) invented it. It's his playbook. THE ONLY THING THAT'S CHANGED is that it's women playing from it, and women consider "women" to be a class.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:28 PM
1

What are the problems? As I see it the problems are: Economy sucks because the state keeps fucking around with it Liberty is being deprived because the state keeps telling people how to live These are universal problems.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:17 PM
13

intersectionality Is bullshit. It's Marxist classwar with a big neon "+ gender" sign and then "+ race" scribbled on a postits note. It's about upper middle class white women wanting to appropriate ALL narratives of oppression.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:59 PM
1

"He was not sent to claim he's god." Well that's what he did. And so that raises questions because either: God is fallible because god sent a prophet who went rogue God deliberately sent a flawed prophet Since we can safely discard the fallible god option (because all abrahamic religions stubbornly insist god is infallible despite their own texts suggesting this isn't the case), we're left with the second option, and the question of WHY? Why would an infallible god do that? We wouldn't have this…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:31 AM
1

In Islam he's just another prophet This is true. and his message was not he is god This is Islam's interpretation. However, if the new testament is taken at face value, Christ does pretty much claim to be the son of god. A point which Islam does not resolve. It works out like this: God, sends Jesus (islam agrees on this), to claim that he is god (clearly he was sent to do that, because that's what he did, unless jesus didn't do what god sent him to do in which case he's a piss poor prophet), whe…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:04 AM
2

beachfront property in Nebraska to sell you That's nice beachfront too. We've lined the other side of it with riverboat casinos. But yeah, Pao is out, celebrate and then pack some warm clothes because we're off to Hoth.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 10:53 PM
2

Don't you mean a voat? But I get what you mean.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 10:12 PM
0

I do mean doctrinal consistency. There are many Islamic sects yes but they're divided over issues much smaller than those that divided the christians. There was never a point in Islam where someone went "HaHA, I declare myself pope! For my first trick, I grant myself a divorce!" Or my religion, the quakers, who interpret the sermons of the mount and the plain to mean we don't need a priesthood. At all. Or organized prayer for that matter. Or the Universalists, who reject the concept of damnation…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 06:37 PM
0

Generally if you're going to retcon something, you pretend it never happened. You don't say "yeah that happened but he was just sent by god, he wasn't actually god", you say "he was a crazy person and we're not going to talk about that anymore." So... he was sent by god, to pretend to be god... WHY?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 12:07 PM
1

Though I will never respect Islam for being basically a fanfic retcon of christ's fanfic (not, mind you, an entirely new fanfic of judaism separate from christ's fanfic; no, literally, a fanfic retcon of a fanfic), I have respect for Islam in one regard: They're pretty good at being consistent. Better than judaism is. WAY better than christianity.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 03:40 AM
2

To put it another way... There's an old Eddie Izzard skit, "Cake or Death". AWALT means that, to women, the choice between "obey or die" really actually does get interpreted in the female brain as "cake or death". The difference between the choices, and the obviousness of the answer, is that stark.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 02:41 PM
8

Confirming again what we already knew, men who defend women who manipulate young men are really just sex starved betas.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:30 PM
2

AW, BUCKLE THIS. LUDICROUS SPEED, GO!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:00 AM
1

I'm from Iowa. From my perspective every city on both coasts is like that.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 02:03 PM
8

have yet to take the redpill about race Sexual dimorphism is trivially easy to grasp and demonstrate. All the nurture in the world won't change biology. Race, however, there is a much greater case to be made for nurture. Particularly that black families were doing pretty well in the fifties before liberalism started ripping up households. There was still both latent and unambiguous racism, but economically the gap between blacks and whites was as narrow as it has ever gotten in this country. It'…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 04:06 AM
18

It's DC. For those who haven't been to DC, I've been there twice. It's a well policed park, surrounded by a shithole ghetto. Seriously, the gradient from park to ghetto happens so fast you can see it happen across streets, because it's the line where the US Park Police jurisdiction ends and the much shittier MPDC jurisdiction begins. "I'm on the one side, I'm on the other. I'm on the east bank, I'm on the west bank." -Robin Hood Men in Tights
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 03:34 AM
3

Trump is a coward. Even he isn't willing to point at the elephant.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:35 PM
7

There really is no savior for a man God created man. Samuel Colt made them equal.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 04:31 PM
1

I think you're afraid to admit that we cannot fix the damage to society while preserving the state. "Our political leadership in Richmond is to timid to face the reality of this coming war. They should look to the bible. It is full of such wars. Only the black flag will bring the north to its senses and rapidly end the war." -General 'Stonewall' Jackson
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 04:14 PM
1

Well, they have. So there goes that argument.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:07 PM
7

There's nothing for it, it's just going to have to play out to the messy end.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:38 AM
16

Well, I hope you like taking flak. AWALT... as generalizations go it's about as broad and blunt as you can get, but it IS more or less true. We've amassed a mountain of evidence so tall Moses could converse with God upon its summit, whereupon God would throw down AWALT, DEAL WIZ IT. Throwing down AWALT has its uses. We live in an era of untruth, where many men simply do not know anything practical about interacting with women beyond just the IKEA instructions.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 04:05 AM
-11

You're young (or at least you act like you are). Eventually you'll want to have been a father. "I had won. I was trying to smile but it was the smile of desolation. Inside, I felt only the pity and the terror and the waste of it all." -Sam Neil as Merlin
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 03:27 AM
73

All women are All women have the potential to be. If circumstance and society provide adequate consequences, women will respond accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 03:11 AM
2

we have the intellectual advantage Which counts for absolutely nothing when arguing with irrational people. Intelligence, in this instance, is only useful when it is applied to analyze the situation and and evaluate the effectiveness of possible courses of action. We are not doing that. The effective response to feminism, is to slap it down before it gets as big as it is today. That was not done. So now it's going to involve the application of coercive force. Which cannot be done within the law …
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:19 AM
5

This article illustrates perfectly why what FOLLOWS feminism will indeed be rape culture insofar as they reckon it. Sooner or later this is going to have to be settled with that oldest and most fundamental principle of governance... Might makes right. It will be the stereotype of domestic violence realized on a macro, society-wide scale. Women nagging and scratching and slapping until the men start throwing punches.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 09:57 PM
17

Well yeah. The question is, how can someone be a libertarian AND a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:11 PM
1

Well I'm convinced.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 03:41 PM
3

When will it end? When they attempt to impose Australian model gun laws. The result will be brief, noisy, and decisive.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:32 PM
218

We've been over this before.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:50 PM
2

If we're gonna put a woman on currency it should be Dorothea Dix. Partly because she's as old as all the faces on the bills already, and partly because she was the first woman to hold a significant federal level public office in the United States (as Superintendent of Army Nurses in the Civil War she was granted coequal power to the Surgeon General).
/r/MensRights30/06/15 12:42 AM
2

My first cousin twice removed was President of the United States (LBJ). I was raised in the hometown of an different President (Hoover). John Brown did his recruiting five miles down the road. Most of my extended family is military and a distant relation was an astronaut. I was raised surrounded by proof that individuals are not powerless.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 02:22 PM
1

I live in Iowa. To me American "society" is a bunch of useless stuck up windbags who tell me what to do. I watch Mockingjay and see a prophetic future where the midwest rises up and cuts ya'll off from everything you don't deserve. Just about everything I eat says made in Iowa and damn near everything else I buy says made in China so what the hell good are you to me? Just a bunch of pompous blowhards on the coast. All you create are edicts, drama, and inflation. You come into our state, say we s…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 11:19 AM
2

A few bad apples don't make a bad bunch. They certainly don't make apples a bad fruit. It's about collective responsibility. Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place. That only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization. -Pres…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:39 AM
4

You might never get your revenge I will. Because I don't have to do anything. The only question is whether I live to see it. But history is very clear on this point... when societies turn against their men, those societies always fall.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 03:22 AM
2

There is nothing to discuss. Clearly you either reject the concept of collective responsibility, or reject that it applies to feminism. I FEEL IT DOES. There you have it. If you and the white knights and the moderate feminists continue to think it doesn't then sooner or later we'll have a civil war and god will decide the truth of it.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 02:02 AM
2

I'm interested in having an actual debate here. No you're not. You're a concern troll, who is predictably dropping the "serious conversation" card, then I post a serious response, then you ignore it and change the topic, just like you did in not responding seriously to the FDR quote. No. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:18 PM
2

Quoting FDR is not a valid response to the point I raised. Sounds like you don't like the fact that it's being upvoted. Its apt. Deal wiz it.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:34 PM
4

I don't even think its even feminism anymore. Are the radical feminists, feminists? Yes. Why? Because they call themselves that and the majority does not disagree with them. But does feminism stand for what it used to? No. It doesn't. Is there some overlord controlling feminism? Not anymore. The academic feminists have lost control, the movement has gone Ice Nine. At this point it's little more than an angry mob that is convinced it has the moral high ground. At most all the priests of feminism …
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:27 PM
3

So yeah I got dragged to the local Pride event by a combination of my shrink, my parents and my sort of boyfriend who all decided it would do me "good" Well, I'm pretty sure you can just say "fuck that, I don't need to change". Just because you're gay (I'm assuming you are) doesn't mean you can't be otherwise conservative. You have to understand that feminism is fundamentally inimical to liberty and capitalism. It is a strange hybrid of fascism and marxism no matter how much it denies it. They w…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:06 PM
7

vast majority of moderate feminists who ... GIVE THE EXTREME FRINGE CREDIBILITY AND POWER. Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place. That only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization. -President Franklin D. Roosevelt
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:53 PM
4

Your house burned down last night, nothing was left but ashes. And it can be proven I didn't start it deliberately? SWEET. I have so much homeowners insurance that if my house burned down I could pay off the mortgage, rebuild the whole damn thing, replace everything in it, and still come out ahead. "I'm older and I have more insurance." -Fried Green Tomatoes
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 03:55 PM
-32

It really doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 01:16 PM
1

The white knights become barbarians too if we are barbarians. Seriously, if this conflict escalated to actual war, killing and dying, with both sides having a credible force (for example if some very traditionalist states seceded taking a portion of the military with them) the differences between the white knights and us will narrow dramatically. War (real war) is the business of men. When society is preoccupied with war, it tends to override all other concerns. Women are told to get in line wit…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:46 PM
-3

What do I say to this? There is only one response to it (and to all of feminism), though it seems to make all of you squeamish. Might makes right.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:42 AM
-3

For. Just in case she's jewish.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:26 PM
2

I come here, I see cow and chicken and ride little horses... This planet has everything! -Draenei Male, World of Warcraft
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 05:52 PM
21

The reasoning of the Iowa Supreme Court justices was simple and logical - and also blindingly obvious Just going to point out that this is utterly the style of the Iowa Supreme Court. It's a non-partisan court appointed by the Iowa State Bar Association sending a short list of candidates they support to the governor, who must pick from that list. The voters regularly vote to dismiss or retain those judges. As a result the court is extremely efficient about words, because they are judges that law…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 12:33 PM
0

MAYBE YOUR FACEBOOK has an unbelievable lack of diversity. But it's not our fault you're a racist.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:26 PM
-2

No. In fact, I submit that to be an MRA, or GG, or TRP, is to be inherently secessionist.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:19 PM
6

You Gary Oaked him.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 12:52 AM
-14

It is a fucking insult to have to accept and live with And this subreddit calls me crazy for wanting the country to collapse into civil war. MensRights, why is it you DON'T?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:55 PM
4

6 credits of social psych. Was going for the minor but then I met the professors.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:59 PM
1

In Heinlein's terran federation, franchise and a small field of specific citizen only jobs (judge, police, politician, teaching "history and moral philosophy") were the only differences between residents and citizens. The protections of person, property, and speech were universal, and more harshly enforced than in our society today.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:27 PM
1

I asked what did are forefathers fight for? Per my previous... They died for an idea, an idea which happened to be naive and detached from reality. I don't listen to You keep replying.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:33 AM
1

I have no problem with owning property (I have a lot of that). I have a problem with shitty one-sided contracts.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 04:13 AM
1

Sexual dimorphism. Surviving didn't require them to excel in those capacities, so they don't. Evolution strives to be efficient.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 04:05 AM
5

Well yeah. They're surrounded by effete men they despise. Had men been men and told the suffragettes no a hundred years ago none of this would have happened.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 04:02 AM
1

Your question was irrelevant to the point. You insisted the tyranny of the majority is a form of slavery. It either isn't, or it is a form of slavery from which one can never escape save BY BEING A TYRANT (and as tyrants can still be slain by the people, they too are slaves to the tyranny of the majority, the mandate of heaven as the Confucians refer to it). You refused to acknowledge that so I refused to indulge your attempt to change the topic. They died for an idea, an idea which happened to …
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:24 AM
1

Explain why you think individual freedom exists.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:14 AM
1

Individual freedom does not exist. Explain why you think it does.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:10 AM
1

Individual freedom does not exist. Because free will does not exist. "Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills." -Arthur Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:25 AM
1

"It's a universal fact that freedom, which conventionally signifies 'the condition of not being subject to restrictions, coercion, or control, imposed by another person or society; to choose goals and actions on one's own initiative', cannot be borderless and unrestrained, even if the borders and limitations are infinitesimal." -Kourosh Ziabari
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:40 AM
0

Individual freedom does not exist.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:25 AM
0

Here, I'll draw you a Euler diagram. Individual freedom DOES NOT EXIST.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:21 AM
-1

I choose individual freedom. Doesn't exist unless you live alone in a hut in uncolonized territory. You can have a tyrant, or a tyrannous majority. THOSE ARE YOUR CHOICES. CHOOSE.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:12 AM
-1

You can have a tyrant, or a tyrannous majority. THOSE ARE YOUR CHOICES. CHOOSE.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:09 AM
1

No that is slavery No it is not. It is the tyranny of the majority. IT IS FUNDAMENTALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO ESCAPE THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY IN DEMOCRACY. You can have a tyrant, or a tyrannous majority. THOSE ARE YOUR CHOICES. CHOOSE. But it is still BETTER than the system we have today where half the tyrannous majority is second class (men, having conscription), and the other half first class (women, exempted). In the system I support, there are first class citizens (those who can vote and must fig…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:56 PM
0

They wouldn't be slaves. They would have franchise.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:14 PM
2

This is getting rather off target, I'm going to try to straighten things back out here. I am absolutely a traditionalist. I think men should have franchise, women shouldn't, and that having franchise must entail risk of conscription for the preservation of the state and society. I'm WILLING to be a Heinlein-ist (that is, service guarantees citizenship to both genders), but not for a nation that has proven itself untrustworthy about conscription. There would have to be a reboot, a new instrument …
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:06 PM
2

Yes it is. If Iowa was to secede today and pledge to never conscript, I would take the government of Iowa at its word until it broke it. The government of the United States has broken its word and cannot be trusted. A promise from the United States that it won't conscript again is worthless. Being worthless, it is an unacceptable bargaining chip in negotiations about gender and franchise.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:44 PM
2

If we didn't start wars, that might be a valid argument. But we do. We started the War of 1812, did really poorly, and passed a conscription act (but the war ended before it went into effect). Later, the civil war saw both sides use conscription, and while the CSA did shoot first, the first year of fighting was a conflict of northern invasion of southern territory until Lee could finally get support for a counter-invasion to try to force Lincoln to end the war. Once a government attempts to cons…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:14 PM
4

do away with the draft Pandora's box. You cannot "do away with the draft". Any such promise is only ink on a page, torn up and forgotten in the moment of need. "Mass drivers? They have been outlawed by every civilized race." "These are uncivilized times." "We have treaties." "Ink on a page." -Londo and Refa, Babylon 5 Like Truman with the atomic bomb, Cromwell and Napolean made conscription a price of doing business. You want to be a world power? You must be prepared to conscript. The threat mus…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:29 PM
3

I have learned two things from video games. EVE Online taught me what its like to be in the smoke filled room. It is because of this experience that I am confident that Greece is already in league with Russia and this 'grexit' drama is really just them twisting the knife before deliberately leaving while preserving the illusion that they were forced out. They have no intention of cooperating, but to maximize the harm to the ECB they have to act like they're trying so the emergency liquidity keep…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 03:58 PM
2

Kilroy's great grandson. He's been everywhere.
/r/askTRP24/06/15 02:23 AM
3

Let it all burn. "War is our judge" -Julius Caesar
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:28 AM
3

There is only one argument that wins against irrational people. All we can do is walk away, and fight if they make a fight of it. We must secede.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 10:58 PM
16

If you are arguing with someone who states that gender is a social construct point them to these studies. Doesn't work. It just doesn't work. Reason and fact do not work on these people.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 10:30 PM
2

Should we be angry If you're going to be angry about nature you're going to be angry for a long time and accomplish nothing. Be angry that mistakes were made in dealing with that nature, and now there is a mess to clean up. Be angry at those who obstruct efforts to clean it up. We must secede.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 04:43 PM
6

I know TRP is apolitical TRP is not apolitical, it's just that there isn't a party that represents our position.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 03:37 AM
-3

We don't. "What do Americans really think about Canada? We don't." -Jon Stewart
/r/MensRights21/06/15 11:28 PM
1

drinking 100 calorie light beer instead of 400 calorie craft beer I don't drink often but when I do I don't settle for less than malt liquor. Four dollars a bottle and worth it.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 08:09 PM
1

The thing is... Greece's behavior makes perfect sense if you assume that they're reading from a script handed to them by Putin to destabilize the EU.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:15 PM
1

That's why I stuck (Business) in as Military Science. Businesses are essentially just states or armies without guns (and sometimes WITH guns). The skillset is the same.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:28 PM
2

What I don't understand is feminists using Ariel when her movie kinda affirms everything we've been saying. "You'll have your looks, your pretty face, and don't underestimate the importance of body language." -Ursula Lo and behold, it works and Ursula has to resort to cheating.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 12:51 PM
2

I agree that there is none. I think philosophy is male-dominated I didn't pick this list because of women, that'd be sexist. I picked the items on this list because in my reckoning they create nothing of value as measured by Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Often as not they prove to be detriments even to the higher needs. Everything in MITLA directly satisfies, or indirectly enables the satisfaction of, or facilitates improvements in the capacity to satisfy, the first two levels. So why exclude, sa…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:01 PM
0

You realize that mathematics and the pure sciences are liberal arts, right? Well then what term would you recommend that encompasses all of: "_____" Studies Law English Art Performance Art Philosophy History Psychology
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:30 AM
2

I stand by the assertion that anyone can get a business degree. Further I'd say that it's more "in spite of business". All business has done for me is make a bottle of coke cost a dollar instead of a nickel.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:29 AM
-1

I see it in reverse. Logic is a natural science, immutable, and philosophy is the subsequent bickering about ethics and morality that came after Aristotle. I see economics as a branch of business, and the current vogue of economic thinking (ie, not Austrian) is so ass backwards wrong that calling it a discipline would be hilarious if it wasn't sad that it's in vogue. Modern economic studies is a fucking religion with debt and inflation as its central tenets, because Keynes happened to be right O…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:10 AM
3

EDIT: Alright, in deference to the points about business I've added a new category which encompasses those qualities of business that are actually useful, and removed the liberal arts and less useful than liberal arts bubbles entirely. Here, I've put together a diagram.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:33 AM
24

Well of course, no, they shouldn't this is idiotic bullshit. THERE ALREADY ARE college programs for textile and design work and they've existed for a long time. They used to be respected fields of study before feminism decided to say they weren't. So let's do this. Instead of trying to shoehorn another letter into an acronym, let's instead call it all MITLA (More Important Than Liberal Arts). Because it seems that the problem here is that Liberal Arts has become a cesspit of indulgent navel gazi…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:09 PM
1

They should run the air hose bell thing across there like they used to do on the full service lane at gas stations until the 80s.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:43 PM
2

I second Admiral Hopper, and also submit Dorothea Dix. Hopper's contributions with FLOW-MATIC (predecessor to COBOL) were of unquestionably immense value to the American economy, but Dix is a better exemplar of the American ideals. As Superintendent of Army Nurses in the Civil War she held the Union hospitals to the expectations of impartiality that would later be codified in the Geneva Convention and the Red Cross societies. Under the circumstances she was quite probably the most powerful woman…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 12:34 AM
3

Every year. Try the wood oven pizza at the top of the hill behind the cultural center. Most people don't get up there unless they're heading to the vinters association in the barn.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:19 PM
3

Formerly, haven't flown in years. Got bored, burned bridges and moved on to new things.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:12 PM
7

Not my best, but the only thing I've got handy on imgur.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:13 PM
12

Patch embroidery.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:01 PM
2

Wanted to start a race war Well, he wasn't too bright. Race wars start because of moral ambiguities. A police officer using deadly force on a suspect in the line of duty can be morally ambiguous. A lynch mob can be morally ambiguous (in as much as a lynch mob reflects the desire for justice divorced from any consideration of due process). A private citizen killing others because he chose to do so is not.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:41 PM
3

"Not doing human right" is not a very effective criticisism to throw at Maximillian Jenius.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:04 PM
1

She's also more attractive. To be frank I don't care what the Federal Reserve does with its funny money, I keep shuffling more and more of it into metals, guns, and improvements to my house. They have a standing court ruling that says the next design of print banknotes must be blind friendly. When the geometries change the ubiquitous bill readers will disappear as card readers replace them.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 05:18 PM
1

So? Liberty is on the eagle.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 05:13 PM
10

Well, yes. Been coming for a while now.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 04:45 PM
7

Not at all. It just justifies what comes next.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:53 PM
2

The law is only worth the threat of violence its based on. Tear it down, uphold a new one with its own threat of violence, and it can be fixed. Hell, the radical islamics are doing that in London right now, creating areas too dangerous for the police to enter.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:15 AM
2

History has never reversed itself anywhere. Well that's a load of myopic revisionist bullshit. Try telling that to the SNP.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:14 AM
1

Traditionalism is never coming back. I live in a state where the the amish are doubling in numbers every 22 years. You're just simply wrong.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:20 AM
1

It's not "fighting for our rights", but rather "fighting those in dissent to force them into compliance". The vast majority of women still internally subscribe to the social contract same as most men, even if they mindlessly parrot some of the rhetoric. It's only the recidivists who are the problem. They need to be deprived of power. They cannot be deprived of power by simple individual detachment from society. The society their power originates from must be torn down and rebuilt anew WITHOUT TH…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:12 AM
-1

They rescinded the contract Those few may have but they were speaking for themselves, not all women (though they wished and perhaps even believed they were). The vast majority of women would screech "that's not what I agreed to, where are all the men?". The CORRECT response is to bring war upon those few in dissent ("War is our Judge" -Julius Caesar), coercing them back into compliance with the social contract by force. Somewhere along the line a generation before us lost the will to do what mus…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:07 AM
2

I'm from the UK culturally irrelevant fantasy Considering how close you are to losing Scotland and having a union jack with no blue (and how overwhelming the support in America is for Scotland), and for that matter contemplating seceding from the European Union, I would think someone from the United Kingdom would be a little more astute about the threat of secession. Utah is closer to attempting it through force than Scotland is. Depending on who wins the next election it's entirely possible an …
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:02 AM
0

Yep. Show me a general with the spine to do what must be done. We cannot fix the problems we face playing by the law. We must shred the law, and the system that has been built upon it. We must secede.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:56 AM
-5

Preachy but insubstantial. You offer me nothing to aspire to. Show me a flag and a chance at winning what we once had. "Here peace, here broken laws be left. Farewell to treaties. Fortune, lead me on. War is our judge, and in the fates our trust." -Julius Caesar
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:45 AM
51

Nautilus suing is bigger than Hulk suing. When an insurance company sues our own insured, we tend to win. Rather, we win, and then we sue (in proper Art of War fashion).
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 08:29 PM
8

Will there be a ban on assault women? Will California outlaw everything that isn't stocky? Will Utah be the only state that allows them into schools?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:46 PM
12

So... You'd have to pay $200 for an NFA stamp to be fat? Sounds good to me.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:32 PM
3

Is this the future we are headed towards? No. We ARE heading towards the dissolution of the Union. Both the American and European. "Here peace, here broken laws be left. Farewell to treaties. Fortune, lead me on. War is our judge, and in the fates our trust." -Julius Caesar Liberalism was always a loan. That debt is about to be called.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:06 AM
3

I lived near U-Iowa for about eighteen years before going to its polar opposite down the road in Ames. I'll describe Iowa City for you all. Iowa City is a donut (socio-geographically speaking). In the middle of the donut is a hippy leftist cesspit of the worst kind of liberalism imaginable, presiding over a campus that has among the most bars per capita of any US public university. A good portion of the campus was built in the 25 year flood plain of the Iowa River, which turned out really badly …
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:38 AM
2

"If you go back to Jungian psychology" No. How about instead we go back to BEFORE Jungian psychology. Maybe to, say... CONFUCIUS. The five basic relationships.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:19 AM
-11

like it being turned around into an argument against men being on campus I don't see that as a problem. The reintroduction of gender segregated colleges would very quickly destroy the entrenched feminist "studies" departments. Men's colleges would become utopias of science and technology, and women's colleges would become cesspits of navel gazing bullshit. "Pray they're that stupid. Pray we're that lucky."
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:06 AM
0

Phone lost 3G. This is the thread I'm maintaining because it has the edits. All others are deleted.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:31 PM
1

DARWIN Biology. Sexual dimorphism. Feminism is exactly as you framed it there. Women, wanting to be men in role and status. They weren't (and shouldn't be) men in role and status because they aren't men in form and ability (mental as well as physical). Its the jealousy of an angry pouty child throwing a tantrum. They did it for the most racist of reasons too; white women despised black men catagorically having something they didn't. Then a few politicians realized that catering to that tantrum w…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:39 PM
0

That claims equality THEY LIED And people like you let go of reason and bought into it. A hundred years ago instead of calling the sufferagettes petulant children and saying no, no franchise because you won't fight in war, people like you bought their framing of the situation and caved. All of what followed was because that line was crossed.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:26 PM
0

"Whatever happened to the American dream?" "IT CAME TRUE!" -Watchmen You want to fix it you have to undo it. Giving women franchise was a mistake. YOU'RE suffering from the delusion that we can fix things with anything less than a full restore from backup. There is a reason why strongly patriarchical society is ubiquitous and its because its the only model that FUCKING WORKS.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:07 PM
1

Full on rebellion only leads to destruction and decay Sure, and I'm all for that. I loved watching New Orleans fucking drown and then turn on itself. world doesn't give a shit about you I know. I feel the same about the rest of the world. Let it all burn. So I can watch.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 11:19 AM
2

Or do you want to be the peasant who studied the social contract and realized the only thing that made the nobles noble was taking it at the tip of their sword? I want to go beyond the sword. I want to raise the black fucking flag. But every attempt to do so since the Battle of Blair Mountain has ended poorly for those who attempted it. "You really want to know what I want? You really want to know the truth, yes? I want my people to reclaim their rightful place in the galaxy. I want to see the C…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 04:13 AM
-5

I've been less than a football field away from a tornado (F1 on the fujita scale).
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 04:05 AM
7

If you need to stick your dick in something in order to achieve focus... well, I guess if that works for you then whatever. But at this point all I want to do is fiddle while the world burns. I've improved myself and mine as much as I need to to live comfortably. But I am not a father. I want to be a father, but I cannot be under the current conditions. I refuse to accept the social contract as it is today, I have not the power to change it individually, and no desire to be martyred trying to ch…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 03:42 AM
1

I have... A STEM degree A tech job A shit ton of money diversified six ways from sunday from a buyout of said tech job An acreage With my own goddamn orchard And pretty much everything else I could possibly ever need short of a boat and a truck with a fucking laser beam on it And I spend time playing WoT and typing on Reddit because there's no fucking point to it all because the SMP is a decimated wasteland of narcissists and blimps. Never gonna be a father or a husband and it seems like we're n…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 03:03 AM
3

Obviously she will become president NOOOOOPE The last time the Democrats elected a Democrat after a different democrat (disregarding Truman who got his first term via dead man's boots), was JAMES BUCHANAN. Her being elected would have the same effect.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 05:48 PM
9

No. That's not what it says at all. A woman was arrested on two charges, public intoxication and domestic assault. The assault charge was dropped and prosecution went with just public intoxication. The prosecutor almost certainly did this because they had conclusive evidence that she was intoxicated, making for a quick and easy conviction. Arguing domestic assault in that case would be a messy trial hinged on testimony with an uncertain outcome. Then the state supreme court (CORRECTLY) ruled tha…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 01:53 PM
0

I think there's bound to be a tipping point Not of their own accord. The thing is that lax immigration has become linked with liberalism and the european union, and opposition to immigration has become a platform of the eurosceptics. It's become an all-or-nothing package. The immigration policy becomes a referendum on the entire liberalist ticket. If the liberals back down and concede that they were wrong about immigration, well then what else were they wrong about? They have to be right about e…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 05:03 PM
2

Amish in America have neither a German identity nor a German state. Uh... Well, you're not wrong as worded but I would hesitate to say they've adopted the "American" identity or have any affinity to the "American" state. At least around Iowa, their identity is as "Iowan" as Robert E. Lee's identity was "Virginian".
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 04:43 PM
5

Certainly; not everything they did made the best of sense. However, as long as you're NOT at war, it does make sense. Doctor being a desirable profession in a husband after all. Tallying up all the professions that women find desirable in husbands and then systematically excluding women from those professions is a very effective way of manipulating the sexual marketplace to encourage strong family formation. "Right" and "wrong" are relative and difficult to test, but whether or not something is …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 02:52 PM
16

Germany knows what it has to do, and Germany has demonstrated it is capable of doing it with cold, calculated German efficiency. The question is, will they?
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 01:08 PM
1

Women and men have mutual interest in promoting fairness. No, they fucking don't. Get it through your head. PEOPLE. ARE. SELFISH. PARTICULARLY women. "The tragic wrongness of what those well-meaning people did, contrasted with what they thought they were doing, goes very deep. They had no SCIENTIFIC theory of morals. They did have A theory of morals and they tried to live by it, but their theory was wrong. Half of it fuzzy-headed wishful thinking, half of it rationalized charlatanry. The more ea…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:09 AM
2

Basically, yeah. And since efforts to deprive women of franchise under the constitution will fail, the only path to ending bureaugamy is to secede.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:09 PM
2

This is why I've been saying that men's activism in the United States must implicitly be secessionist.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:33 PM
1

"He taught me a song, would you like to hear it Dave?"
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:59 PM
1

I don't recall saying anything to that effect that the situation is hopeless. Here I'll do it with a list. As long as women have franchise, they will fight to maintain the imbalances that exist today, and to expand them They will do this because of moral hazard They were successful in creating the imbalances so we have to assume they will be successful in preserving them so long as they have franchise It is not possible to deprive women of franchise under the Constitution now that it has been ex…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:08 PM
1

I'm going to leave this to the brigaders at this point. You're being downvoted, I'm not. I win.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:43 AM
1

No, there is not. As soon as you resort to dropping name calling in lieu of responding to the point being made that is ad hominem.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:35 AM
1

because you are a troll. That is not ad hominem one bit. You are in error. It is ad hominem.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:25 AM
1

Claiming I'm a troll is projection on your part. You asked two questions. I answered them. You responded with ad hominem.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:03 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:57 AM
0

Not in the least. Why don't you try actually arguing. Because at the moment my point stands uncontested. We have to be secessionist because it is the only way to win. I have demonstrated why. Now it is your turn to demonstrate why not, or to concede that you cannot.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:54 AM
-2

Who is "we"? Those wishing to undo the excesses of rampant liberalism/feminism that have precipitated the existence of this very subreddit. What do you mean by "win"? Rollback those excesses. So long as women have franchise, the battle will never be resolved it will remain an eternal conflict until we are destroyed or subsumed by a more traditionalist society from beyond our borders. To actually settle the matter, once and for all, and to move on, we have to quash the source of the problem, whic…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:44 AM
-3

We cannot win without depriving women of franchise and no attempt to do so within the Constitution will succeed. Secession is the only viable endgame.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:33 AM
2

"Are we to be two immortals locked in an epic battle until Judgment Day and trumpets sound?" Things are building to a crescendo. Whether its GamerGate, or Title IX, or the 2016 elections, or Ukraine, or Greece (probably Greece), or ISIS... something is going to snap. The noontime of liberalism has already past.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:13 AM
-4

I don't think they have to be. In my view men's rights activism in the United States must implicitly be secessionist. It is the only strategy which has a chance of success. I dunno whether you call that liberal or not.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:06 AM
1

Flee TO?! Uh... have you not seen the news recently? If Greece leaves the Euro the Deutsche Bundesbank is gonna get torpedoed for about a third to a half of the hundred billion euros worth of target2 interbank liabilities the Greek banks have run up in the last few months, and then Russia will move on Kiev. Nationalist sentiments are in ascendance. You don't wanna be in Europe when that raging shitstorm starts.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:35 AM
1

The sad thing is that Of Women is both his most tangential piece and the least tedious. On the Freedom of the Will is probably his most important essay, but the entirety of The World as Will and Representation is significant as well. You don't read his stuff for fun that much is sure. You read it to see someone systematically surround Aquinas's intellectual fort with cannons like the last holdout country in a game of Risk and then blast it from all sides until there is nothing left. "Man can do …
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 05:22 PM
0

That's the thing, there really isn't. Schopenhauer's version of the will really shut down serious discussion of philosophy and made room for the lunacy of Freud and Nietzsche. Freud was particularly damaging bdcause his fanfic philosophy was adopted as authoritative. It is because of Freudian thinking that we live in a nanny state filled with SJWs. Schopenhauer was very explicit that life sucks and thats the way it is. Atlas Shrugged, and Starship Troopers are both Schopenhauerian works. Particu…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 05:05 PM
1

Nietzsche didn't really refute Schopenhauer as build on him, just as Schopenhauer built on Kant. There are really two trains of thought in western philosophy. Immanuel Kant (upon which Schopenhauer worked) and Thomas Aquinas (which was Hegel's foundation). Aquinas attempts to merge Aristotle with Christianity, and his work is thus highly regarded to the commons for its christian conclusions, but otherwise widely panned by actual thinkers because its basically still just divine law. Kantian syste…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 04:37 PM
-15

I will admit to being sexist. The 'equality' the feminists seek is not. It is an artificial balance maintained at enormous cost to the state and economy. In the long term it cannot be sustained and we will revert to traditionalism.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:09 PM
-1

Philosophy ended with Schopenhauer. "Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills." The rest of the community read his stuff, had a collective "well... shit" moment, and then tried to forget him rather than refuting him because his case for determinism is pretty strong.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 02:48 PM
14

And thus was invented the noble profession of barrister.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 08:34 PM
15

Once again, the "personality" card is played so much by women. A thought... For MANY SJW's today, the first (new) Disney princess movie they saw was The Little Mermaid. I call attention to this because they've forgotten that in the movie, Ariel trades her voice to be human, and... it turns out to be not much of a problem. She's still able to obtain the affection of the man she desires to attract, on account of being physically attractive and eagerly receptive to advances. If being mute is not a …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 04:02 AM
1

I for one am all for feminism embracing a darwinist view of sexual dimorphism. As long as they do it loudly, enthusiastically, and completely.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:51 PM
5

"In a general way, I think what has to be done is not to try and convince or persuade the majority of people that we are right, as much as try to increase tensions in society to the point where things start to break down. To create a situation where people get uncomfortable enough that they’re going to rebel. So the question is how do you increase those tensions?" -Theodore Kaczynski
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 10:19 AM
11

Girls who equivocate porn use to cheating Are inevitably overweight and ugly. You can gut punch their argument by simply calling them out on that. "I'd rather wank to her than fuck you."
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 02:35 PM
3

It will not be changing so you need to look elsewhere for solutions. This is why I've beens saying all along that the manosphere must implicitly be secessionist or revolutionary.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 03:03 AM
0

Coworkers wives tried to throw a grenade at me "Brick, where'd you get a hand grenade?"
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 09:57 PM
5

You should read up on the dirty history of the Federal Housing Authority and how it segregated previously integrated communities. The Democrats are hardly clean handed.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 03:26 AM
1

If you earnestly wish to understand what I said, you should read Heinlein's Starship Troopers. It explains it far better than I can.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:52 AM
2

restricting women to make up for their advantages The mental gymnastics in this sentence are ridiculous. The advantage IS having the vote without the responsibility. Taking away that advantage isn't a "restriction", it's taking away a sexist advantage.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:01 AM
4

So you agree with my assertion that the present situation (women having franchise without responsibility) is sexist against men?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 01:30 AM
-5

Sexism is giving franchise to one gender free of the attendant responsibilities that are placed upon it for the other. Generally speaking women don't want to be subject to conscription. I don't want them to be either. So I don't want them to have franchise.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 01:18 AM
-4

I would wager that nobody on TRP has a problem with women being able to vote Uh, I do. So does Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat). Women should never have been given franchise, and it is why the country is coming apart today.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 12:39 AM
2

When you have that much power where is there to go? There isn't.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:17 PM
2

Either is fine by me, I just would love to have a flatbed truck with a crane.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:10 PM
2

I've lived through a bunch of flash floods and two "hundred year" floods ('93 and '08) and and I'm not a hundred years old. I can recall a couple times where I got through water I probably shouldn't have tried to get through.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:04 AM
7

If you could have any car you wanted what would you choose? I already own the F-250 I want. I just need a snorkel kit for it. But if we're talking ANYTHING... M1084 5 Ton Long Chassis with Materials Handling Equipment
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 02:55 AM
1

What about singing about poker?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 12:41 AM
2

I don't see anything wrong with what he said. feminists that cannot wait to label us as the worst thing since the holocaust They already have. Ages ago.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 12:10 AM
1

That support person later discussed Kipnis' situation at a "Faculty Senate" meeting—and has subsequently been accused of, yes, committing a Title IX violation. Won't be long now. Not long at all.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 01:40 PM
1

Imagine that the worst thing that could happen, happens. How bad is it, really? Texas, Dixie, the Rockies, and the Midwest secede, we have a second Civil War, and the eastern seaboard is reduced to so much radioactive ash that we have to start making globes with glow-in-the-dark paint.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 01:03 PM
1

hijacked By whom? another feminism It is. You were saying?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:43 AM
3

I was sort of thinking in a more secessionist sense than in a catastrophic sense. There's no precedent under the United States Constitution for depriving a category of people of franchise after having granted it to them. Franchise for women having been made constitutional, it's unlikely that any attempt to rescind it would survive the judiciary. I don't think continuity of governance would be an issue My point is that breaking continuity of governance must be our stated plan. Given that it's imp…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 12:44 AM
1

I think we're talking past each other here. What I'm getting at is that science hasn't really taken the step of unifying logic and morality and philosophy to create a falsifiable theory of ethical calculus and a natural absolute moral law.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:22 PM
2

Religion is being replaced with liberalism. I posit that it is an inherently unstable system. Heinlein addressed this with Starship Troopers years ago. The problem is that while science has generally demolished religion, it has NOT put forth a scientific theory of ethics. Moral philosophy is a dead field of study, has been since Schopenhauer critiqued Kant. The response of the philosophers to Schopenhauer was a collective "well, shit...". Followed by a century of silence, during which Freud and …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 04:30 PM
8

Do you agree that women having franchise (the vote) contributes to the issues we have in society today? Do you believe franchise can be taken from women while maintaining continuity of the current state?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:05 PM
45

Wrong petition. The one that COUNTED (the one of students) was pathetically low. Strictly speaking her position isn't taxpayer funded, it's out of student union fees. Of course, I still think the university's leadership should force the issue and have her removed (which they absolutely could do; just not in a "do it because I'm telling you to do it" way but rather a "do it or we make you regret not doing it" way). There is always leverage to apply.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:05 AM
25

I understand some of you will just say don't bother, but What's wrong with having fun with my new found power? It's pandering to her want of attention. Silence is what drives women genuinely insane. Being thrown off the reservation and seeing life continue on without her.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 11:09 PM
2

Not at all. Look back to the Monroe presidency, which was named the era of good feelings by people living in it. Manifest destiny combined with martial triumph can do a lot for a nation's mood. Of couse, the native tribes didn't like it so much...
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 08:11 PM
4

They don't really accept outsiders readily. Rather, they're doubling every twenty three years because the typical amish mother has 5 children before 25. The rural countryside is increasingly bifuricated into lords and serfs. The serfs being the amish using animals and simple tractors, and the lords, the modern farmers using multimillion dollar, highly roboticized, gps steered equipment with locomotive grade horsepower and controlling whole townships (and in a few places in Nebraska, whole counti…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:51 PM
10

I think you know very little about what is happening in the midwest. The amish are experiencing exponential population growth due to their somewhat hypocritical attitude towards modern obsteterics. At their current trajectory they will be the largest religious denomination in the US by the tricentennial.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 12:04 PM
1

When gangs beat up on one individual They tend to be stronger individually than the victim. Or at the very least led by someone stronger.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:15 AM
1

I just want their validation; I don't care about talking with people. Solipsism ahoy. They commented on how rude I was, being silent and playing with my smartphone. If that is an accurate summary of the events then they are correct. You were being rude. Interaction and validation are transactional.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 04:32 AM
3

I have a cocktail of mental health issues and don't know where to start fixing them. Okay Step 1 I want you to stand looking at the wall. Then I want you to bang your head repeatedly while telling yourself that's bullshit. Back with me? Okay so physical activity doesn't seem to be a problem for you. You're a little spare on details but I'm guessing you have very low social engagement. When was the last time you participated in anything in a group outside of a work environment?
/r/askTRP27/05/15 04:21 AM
11

Trainwreck Well, we can't accuse them of false advertising.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 03:46 AM
1

Yes. This isn't rape culture. What FOLLOWS will be, but this isn't.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:28 AM
2

A fight between 1 and 9 is rarely a fight between 1 and 9, unless the 9 are trained to fight as a whole. It's usually at any point a fight of 1 vs 2. A man surrounded by 9 women with no inhibitions against violent action should charge one and immediately bowl her over, ideally incapacitating her. The next closest two women will try to grapple. One of these must be tossed and the other then incapacitated. The fight continues along these lines, targeting one and breaking grapples until at some poi…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:20 AM
1

Oh, no. I'd bet 30 silver pieces that he is a she. The tone of the post shifts from conversational to confrontational to flat out antagonistic, and entire post uses vapid phrasing (who says "who aren't fake"?).
/r/askTRP26/05/15 01:53 AM
1

I'm calling his bluff dimwit.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 01:45 AM
1

Go back, read it again.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 01:40 AM
2

Granted, late abortion is killing a conscious being, but early abortions are doing nothing but killing a lump of cells. It's a slippery slope. The christian fundamentalists, for all the bad, have one thing right and that is that you have to stand on principle. The PRINCIPLE is that there is no discontinuity of life. A child organism is a continuation of life that already existed. The law historically has defined life as beginning at birth, the point at which an organism ceases to be a physical s…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:31 AM
2

I don't care if it's risky. If I say it I absolutely mean it. The SMP to me is like a world where the only store is Walmart. I can afford better than they have on the shelves.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 10:57 PM
2

Women actually need to compete, because the best men don't have sex with all the low smv women Nearly all women start out at menarche with reasonably high smv; high enough to attract any man provided he isn't outright gay. Rare is the woman who is obese by 20. Feminism isn't about like competing with like. It's about "had your time and blew it" post wall competing with the next generation.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 10:43 PM
1

Why are you single? Why are you overweight?
/r/askTRP25/05/15 09:12 PM
1

Where are the women. "Believe me professor, I've been asking myself the same question for 6 years."
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:37 PM
2

We respected irony as irony until you made comedy fair game.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:17 PM
2

Not as such. Biology ensures that the vast majority of women start out desirable and remain so long enough to (in nature's opinion) pair and reproduce. Biology also ensures that men are predisposed to be receptive to advances from women at that peak desirability. Women don't need to compete, nature has already provided them the tools for that. They simply have to choose. Feminism tells women to squander that window of peak desirability in academic pursuits, to waste it on relationships that don'…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 02:48 PM
2

i was talking about competition within gender As I. The necessity for competition with the same gender is predicated on how society manages the relationship between gender. If marriage is permanent, and all men are awarded more status to women, then the need and opportunity for competition is lessened. Women choose earlier, choose for life, and resist caddish behavior. There is less reason for men to compete because there are more desirable women to go around under such a model.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 02:31 PM
1

There should never be competition between The bible (and established law up until about a century ago) made women subordinate to men so that competition wouldn't happen.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 02:24 PM
1

Well, if you're asking that question then I guess in your case yeah maybe you can.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:16 PM
1

Did she spit on you?
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:03 PM
1

That's not a sweater, it's a turtleneck.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 01:55 PM
3

We'll say it together. AWALT
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:55 AM
1

What do you actually say? There is no completely effective universal neg. It's a situational thing.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:53 AM
4

To put it briefly... When you walk away, you don't stop walking.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:16 AM
1

Maybe for some it did. I can tell you, growing up quaker and then atheist in unincorporated township Iowa, feminism didn't exist until I ran into it in college. Till then the only prejudice I'd run into was how much the boy scouts don't like atheists (answer is not very much at all).
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 01:20 AM
3

This takes active forms, such as the conclusion any woman or person of color who outperforms a Redpiller must have cheated to do so, either with sexual favors or affirmative action. No, we're not saying they must have. Just that it's frequently the case that they did. Stop being a parliament of whores and we'll stop calling you out for it.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:07 AM
3

The last report you'll ever need on the topic. Prepared under contract for the US Department of Labor.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:46 PM
0

it has helped opened our eyes and even women's eyes to the truth of how this world really is when it comes to the nature of women It did nothing that the bible didn't do earlier.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 11:17 PM
5

Is there actually any evidence that it inhibits the ability to pair bond Yes. There have been studies that have shown that the risk of divorce is linked to the number of lifetime sexual partners. The only real reason I can think of (it being bad for society) is also applicable to men? Well you tell me, is being divorced, and potentially losing access to your children and having your savings and wages confiscated bad? Seems bad to me.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 10:38 PM
8

Finland has a reputation to uphold.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:34 PM
2

Yeah this isn't really TRP material. Wouldn't even really be mensrights material. She used non-lethal force to bust an actual crime and the court wants to give her a bounty for it. Fine, whatever. It's completely within their purview to do so.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 08:34 PM
1

The author is a man, not a woman. Don’t get me wrong, I believe that there’s a system called gender. As I. Darwin believes it too. It subjugates people by first forcing them into gender identities, and then creating a hierarchy of those identities. Now that's where you go off the rails. Yes, there is a hierarchy. This is called gender dimorphism. But your gender identity is a product of your genetic composition. It is not forced upon you, it IS you, it is the first attribute you ever possess. It…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:19 PM
-5

Should I get a lawyer I recommend the Law Office of Smith & Wesson. Practicing in criminal defense and personal injury.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:27 PM
1

Next her.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:52 PM
0

I think its spot on.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:51 PM
0

Helen Keller
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:39 PM
3

"Hey Butthead... emma suck a wick. Heh heh heh."
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:23 PM
1

Lost me at tories. Shouldn't they be FOR the tories? I mean, inciting Scotland to flat out leave seems to me like the best way to snap liberalism's spine throughout the isles. Not to mention America. Scottish secession might prompt Texas to attempt the same.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:46 PM
2

I know that. I'm saying it for the purpose of worrying stupid people who don't.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 04:57 PM
1

i don't think water guns are a worthwhile use of scouts time I'm just gonna throw this out there... I think almost a solid third of the not-sleeping time my patrol spent camping (especially Jamboree in '97), was actually spent playing Magic: The Gathering (or capture the flag if it was dark). Hell I can remember playing MTG, in a canoe, while paddling, somewhere in Boundary Waters, by having the person in the middle handle the cards for us.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:29 AM
2

the Dems want Hillary The last time the Democrats elected a Democrat after a Democrat (without it being Truman who got his first term via dead man's boots), was in 1856. Four years later we were at war.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 01:05 AM
1

Oh, no I've totally had to duck when someone was like "uh it didn't do anything? (turns)". I just think that coddling people is worse than embracing risk. Starship Troopers, where they're training and 1 in 500 is a live bullet? If I lived in the terran federation, I'd accept that risk for citizenship.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:45 PM
5

I disagree. (Former range asst for one summer) Its just another example of liberalism run amok. These people would take away all shooting sports and then all guns if they thought they could do it.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:20 PM
1

I am already part of a movement working towards Iowa secession.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:21 PM
1

Get the hell out of this country you conceited little ingrate.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:15 PM
1

Yes it is an appeal to authority. Just as you entire argument in this entire thread has been entirely postmodern (that is, rejecting all authority simply because it is authority). The authorities of abrahmic, confuscian, and platelian thought are not to be casually dismissed on account of "appeal to authority" alone. They have been experimentally tested over thousands of years and have endured because societies which embraced them, well, survived. It is the experimental testing of the peatree di…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:56 PM
1

there's a difference Both confuscian and abrahamic thought disagree with you. The son must honor the father whether it is deserved or not. Whether it is appreciated or not. Whether they are dead or not. It is a commandment (and in confuscian, one of the five bonds). I disagree You are disagreeing with Plato, and the subsequent two thousand years of history that have shown Plato to be largely correct. TLDR: This is you
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:35 PM
1

Okay? From the scout law? I don't understand what you mean by this. Google it.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:09 PM
1

we'll never have equal rights until we do away with it si vis pacem, para bellum our anscestors don't deserve anything Then you are neither loyal nor reverant. Make sure you tell your parents before this christmas that you owe them nothing for not deciding to abort you. You can scribble out thanksgiving and call it thanksfornothing. And...mmmm yeah... I'm gonna need you to come in on Memorial Day. Since we don't owe anything to the memory of our dead ancestors.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:21 PM
3

... And out at Philmont, at tasty live animals. Hell I remember building siege engines... in cub scouts. First the dinky little 2x4 and bungee ones, then the real deal throwing bowling balls and dowels across the football field.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:28 PM
2

Don't we deserve better? No. Our ancestors deserve to have us take this fight as seriously as they did. should be forcibly restricted into the same warrior role they have been in for thousands of years IT IS OUR ROLE. If you don't take it seriously I promise you there are many men on this planet who will gladly bash your skull in with a rock and take your place and the women who live in that place. And generally speaking those women will treat him better than they treat you.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:14 AM
3

The Athenians taught the world in the Melian dialog that if men are not ready at all times to fight, then they will in all eventuality be destroyed. This is not a choice, but rather the price of liberty. It does not necessarily assure liberty, of course, but derelicting it assures the loss of liberty.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:02 AM
7

I have the last edition of Boy Scout Handbook that still taught quarterstaff fighting. So naturally I think this is complete and total BS.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:14 AM
3

Lemme get this straight. You're asking us how to ignore someone?
/r/askTRP19/05/15 07:44 PM
1

I never took a college math course I didn't flunk the first time (and I'm an engineer).
/r/askTRP19/05/15 05:02 PM
2

"Yeah dunce, now Jane's a loose end. Keep your story vague." -Archer
/r/askTRP19/05/15 04:53 PM
0

Well I've been sayin it for a while now but it hasn't happened yet. Food for though though: The last time the Democrats elected a democrat after a democrat (excluding Truman, who doesn't count because his first term was dead man's boots) was in 1856. We were at war 4 years later.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:02 AM
16

Well, in YOUR circumstances... Talk to the police tomorrow, get your complaint of abuse on record first, and cease communication with her. If she comes to your house again, do not open the door, call the police. Your best advantage is in initiating the case as a trespassing charge and seek a restraining order to avoid your property. Then any charges she makes will be seen as retaliatory. Do not step outside when the police arrive. That is critical. DO NOT step outside when the police are on site…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:17 AM
1

Your inability to use SI notation is not my problem.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:17 AM
1

I walked 75m ten minutes ago. To the grocery store.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:53 AM
1

I'm up for a tomb-robbing, but unfortunately he was cremated.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:34 AM
0

Gandhi did 21 days on three separate occasions.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:27 PM
1

Three days is not a hunger strike.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:43 PM
2

but by the lack of action against it? If you think there's no action, you're mistaken. The culture war is very much so a hot war right now, you're just in the wrong theater. GG is making enormous gains, to the point of it becoming a rout. You simply have to fight social justice the way GG is, by raising the black flag.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:08 PM
1

They should have cast Mulgrew for President Coin.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:57 PM
7

I can, but that's because I'm not a penniless hippie.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 04:36 AM
8

Why are there so many "betas" today? Suffrage and secularism When religion and the state treated men as first class citizens and women as slightly less than, men were alpha relative to women. Women were in general okay with this until the law elevated black men over white women.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:52 PM
1

The temperance movement and the suffrage movement were reciprocal. If you don't know that then you don't even know the history of feminism. Temperance candidates weren't polling for shit until women got the vote. Banning alcohol wasn't exactly a good way to win votes among men (unless they were methodist). And yeah I focus on America, because if I look at the whole world I have to ask you why feminism gives more of a damn about a proven liar carrying a mattress around campus than they do about I…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:30 PM
1

Yep. And student lending at an artificially depressed interest rate that the market wouldn't be able to carry given the delinquency rate, and worse, releasing those loans in bankruptcy all contributes.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 01:48 PM
1

That addresses future borrowers but it doesn't address the millions of people who are already underwater for student debt.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 01:40 PM
1

Except now congress is talking about discharging those loans in bankruptcy because an entire generation is mired in debt that will (if left as is) preclude them from ever owning real property. If we do this it will have bad consequences for the economy but the idiots in both parties don't seem to get that. But you bring up jail. Jail is slavery. A state monopoly on it, and a rather inefficient one at that. Jailing non-violent people is a waste. Better to collateralize the person.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 01:37 PM
1

No. What was the FIRST THING women did with their newly given vote? Prohibition. They started as they meant to go on, with bigger and more intrusive government telling people what to do and what not to do.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:34 PM
1

Yeah I've heard it said on these forums that authoritarian government and traditional gender roles are the price we pay for civilization. Traditionalism IS civilization. Well, a facet of it anyway. WAR is civilization. Its cause and its purpose. Civilization exists as a logistical necessity for the furtherance of war. That is why it came into being. Patriarchy is one element of that devotion to war. Men fight and die. Women stay behind the walls and raise more men. The surviving men become patri…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 04:05 AM
3

And they will shortly thereafter be conquered. You haven't reconciled the relationship between government and... ugh... patriarchy for lack of a better word. If you reduce the government then by necessity patriarchy will reassert because women will choose it. It is the existence of an overarching and imposing state which enables the diminishment of patriarchy. You CAN have for strong authoritarian government and strong patriarchy (Sparta for example), but you can't have neither. Nature abhors a …
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 01:29 AM
1

Are you suggesting that modern society is "crumbling into anarchy" due to females having the vote? It isn't that they have the vote, it's what they do with it. If you all wouldn't vote for the moon and the stars it wouldn't be a problem. That they shouldn't have the vote because of war is a principles thing. That they use the vote they have, poorly, that's a society-is-crumbling thing.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:39 PM
1

False. "Modern society" is crumbling into anarchy. America is kept safe from external threat only by geographic isolation and like minded neighbors, but even within our own country there is a growing risk of civil war as part of the country cannot stand another part of the country. I would rather fight a civil war than see Hillary Clinton be president and I suspect the reverse is true about many liberals.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:16 PM
1

however the only reason women weren't involved in these wars is due to patriarchy False. Women fought and died in wars throughout history. The civilizations that were forced to throw women into war in any quantities, as a rule, almost always lost. Because they had no replacement generation to continue the fight. This is why wars like the Punic and Peloponnesian and Gaelic wars were multi-generational (the French and English fought an aptly named "Hundred Years War", which saw among other things,…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:09 PM
1

Yes. Understand: War creates civilization. Society exists because of war, not in spite of it. The reason we don't live in huts and gather food is because of war. We gathered togther for safety in numbers. Specialized into trades to produce more efficiently to allow for non-food trades like mining and smithing. Built walls and cities... All because of war. To be better than our neighbors. To beat them at the arms race of civilization. Social strata exists to facilitate war by using people efficie…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:44 PM
1

Read Starship Troopers. Robert Heinlein explains it better than I can. But in short... Women have an inherent value that men lack, that is, the capacity to bear children. A society that loses 90% of its men but none if its women need only hide behind the walls for a generation before bouncing back as strong as before. Men are logically therefore the best choice to do the dying necessary to preserve the state. They're replacable. As well as, on average, stronger and have greater endurance. But si…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:30 PM
2

That's a cop-out, you haven't even tried.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:21 PM
1

In short, conscription. Ultimate power must be balanced with ultimate responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:20 PM
9

:cigar: Go buy some silver boys, it won't be long now.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:10 PM
1

The government is at fault yes but only because they half implemented things. They didn't think about the full economic rammifications of what they created. As long as student loans weren't a thing, as long as they weren't artificially depressing the lending rate for unsecured loans, a no-slavery economy worked. But they did, and now we have to clean up the mess. Which means choosing. Cease unsecured lending for knowledge, or secure those loans by allowing slavery.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:15 PM
1

Credit cards have limits and charge very high interest. If student loans charged as much interest as credit cards do we wouldn't have a crisis because nobody would be able to afford them in the first place. But education is somehow this sacred cow where we have to lend at rates the market can't carry for the underlying risk and without any evaluation of the individual risks of each loan. Its a recipe for moral hazard. If you borrow a hundred thousand to get an english degree and wind up as a par…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:04 PM
1

You didn't address the point I made. You should not be able to borrow money for education unless you can be property, because your mind is the underlying asset.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 05:50 PM
6

I don't think you can have sentient beings as property. I disagree. I don't think people should be allowed to borrow money for education UNLESS its possible for sentients to be property, because without it there is no collateral. You can't repossess education. That's partly why the American economy is so messed up right now, because there is this massive pool of student debt that is not only underwater because of depressed wages, but also backed by absolutely nothing. There is no underlying asse…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 05:32 PM
2

I wouldn't accept traditionalism except full blown traditionalism. Ie, women as almost-property. There but to raise children and keep house and not entitled to divorce save under the most egregious of behavior on my part. I want to be a father, not a husband. If the one leads to the other under terms which protect my interests in the ventue then I see it as a fair deal. Cost of doing business as it were. "You can't avoid the toll on the path to China." -Japanese Proverb
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 05:14 PM
5

Hey, I'll take traditionalism (as long as it is fully realized traditionalism, that is, women have no franchise). At least it offers something.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 04:34 PM
3

Don't hop unless you have a plan to go full galt or start a business. Its pretty hard to beat insurance as a tech worker. The pay is as good as finance but there are fewer rules. The management is also generally more amicable to spending money to mitigate security risks than in other industries.
/r/askTRP15/05/15 02:36 PM
1

No. Women just are. Does our society expect more reason of them than most are capable of? Yes
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:15 PM
23

“the costs of wrongly disbelieving a survivor far outweigh the costs of calling someone a rapist" -Zerlina Maxwell "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." -Sir William Blackstone "It is more important that innocence should be protected, than it is, that guilt be punished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world, that all of them cannot be punished.... when innocence itself, is brought to the bar and condemned, especially to die, the subject will ex…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 03:36 AM
6

This is triggering, this is sexist. Sexist? THIS IS SPARTA!
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:55 AM
2

quality white American women Where? I don't see any.
/r/askTRP14/05/15 10:23 PM
2

Then disprove it.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:53 PM
1

I don't need to disprove anything Well if you want to admit intellectual defeat then I suppose that's your right. You must not have a very strong belief if you fold that easily though. Also if you think I'm a feminist, you're mistaken. I don't think women should have the vote.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:51 PM
2

Groups are defined by the public's perception of the group. Just as words in the lexicon are defined by what the majority interprets them as. The dictionary is descriptive, not perscriptive, and lags behind due to the time between editions. If you want your meaning of the word feminism to prevail as the common one, you should be berating those within the feminist movement that give the public reason to reevaluate the word.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:36 PM
1

I don't see you disproving what I said.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:29 PM
3

Then of course you understand that it is angry women from the free love generation who gave it up to men who didn't marry them, and then realized that giving it up for free in the free love era screwed them out of the happy fairy tale ending their mothers had. So they resolved to make the subsequent generations give it up too and turn out just as miserable and unloved as they were.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:19 PM
1

Do you understand what it is?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:15 PM
-1

Even bronies have enough dignity to be leery of a call girl.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:28 PM
-1

He wasn't my equal. And so who is? Christian Grey?
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:16 PM
0

Emphasis on you dumped. You f-ed up. You blew up what sounds to me like a pretty good situation. For what? For this? For what you have now? This is the essence of feminism. "The problem with no name". You had a pretty good thing going and it ceased to sparkle so BOOM. Fck the consequences, yolo. Well now you know the consequences. And maybe, if you're not a terrible human who wants others to be as miserable as you are, you'll take your experience and go tell young women the truths you apparently…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:01 PM
0

False. You know its false. Its implicit in your original post. Hell, in the title. You know you are different in the eyes of others now.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:47 PM
0

By the standards of most men everywhere, yes, you are. Men decide what men find desirable in women.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:40 PM
0

I can't rely Well yeah. Now. That is the feminism. You didn't realize you were broken until you already were. You were fed lies to give it up as cheaply as they did so you'll wind up just as broken and lonely and angry as they did before. :awkwardslowclap:
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:30 PM
2

No. Its moral hazard. Next topic.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:05 PM
2

Aaron is right that this movie is insidiously bad.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:03 PM
-1

You sell sex the same as a housewife does. The housewife gets a better deal for it. You are a diligent feminist worker bee whether you acknowledge it or not. You're studying cognative neuroscience because its the only thing you don't find boring (your words), yet want to be married and a housewife (your words). What makes you a diligent feminist worker bee? Your apparent determination to win a degree which you would not use if you were to have your goal of being married and a housewife. They've …
/r/askTRP13/05/15 01:43 PM
2

I've only ever had sex in my personal life with men with men I've been in serious relationships You believe that sex for money and sex for love are distinctly different. Men reject that idea as bullshit. You sell sex. So does a 1950's housewife. The housewife gets a better long term deal for it. If you don't like living in a shitty apartment with a crummy kitchen, no security, and a bad roommate maybe you should look at how the 1950's housewife lives and ask yourself if feminism has really made …
/r/askTRP13/05/15 12:30 PM
6

I don't ask for dates. That's a perfectly fine answer.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 03:01 AM
2

Then don't sit here writing one.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:53 AM
1

Read it. Ask questions afterwards. Here's a synopsis.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:48 AM
1

Why on earth would the army support race rioters though? The Egyptian one did as recently as two years ago. Citizen armies and riots are dangerous to combine, because once in a while they turn from a riot into a coup. Most of the military is recruited from red states. A disproportionately large number of them are black. A disproportionately large number of them come from the very slummy cities that are now tearing themselves apart. The military hates the legislature. Doesn't like the executive b…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:08 AM
1

Do you really think the rioters have any chance of standing up against the army, though? Who says the army is on your side? You yourself have said you don't want to fight so what loyalty do they have to you? You don't think they're needed you think nukes make them irrelevant. You don't want to stand up and defend principles with your life so why should they do the same for you when the other side is?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:51 AM
1

I'm saying if there's a WW3 it's going to be fought with nukes And that's what's childish about it. There won't be a ww3, not as you reckon it. One or multiple rogue states will decide "fuck the outer space treaty", launch orbital interception packages and ICBMs will cease to be relevant. Probably Israel. Your grasp of nuclear deterrence is based around a pre-SpaceX world. Where only a couple countries had the technology to even threaten SDI. Now you can build SDI off the shelf and probably do a…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:38 AM
0

Your behavior is cowardly, and your belief in the supposed supremacy of a weapons system is childish.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:03 AM
-1

Then you are selfish, and a coward, and you do not understand the price of liberty. This explains your fetishistic invocation of nuclear weaponry. You need to read Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein and more importantly The Dragon Never Sleeps by Glen Cook. Our arsenal is a guardship (read the book). An unchanging plateau, and the outsiders keep getting closer to parity. You think that your grandparents and great grandparents bought peace for all time. BULLSHIT. Bull fucking shit. They bought …
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:38 PM
-1

what's wrong with trying to make dangerous jobs more safe It's irrelevant to the point at hand. Are men happier with this arrangement too? Largely yes, which is why we're seeing what some people disparagingly refer to as a "marriage strike". Men are rationally responding to sexual market economic signals by choosing to opt out of what marriage would give them (which at this point is practically nothing).
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:59 PM
2

Shouldn't it be natural for them to embrace their sexuality Yes. It should also be natural for them to have a .7 WHR. Sex negative feminists are overwhelmingly ugly and/or overweight and consequently, well, have no sexuality. They are rejected as sexual beings by men. So they lash out in bitter jealousy.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:56 PM
1

I don't think that kind of objectification is as common Then you are naive about women. All women are like that. This is why disgust for supplicating beta behavior is universal. Women, at a low level, want to be followers of the most powerful man they can have. A man who puts her above himself ain't worth following. It's survival strategy.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:31 PM
-1

Can't do this why? Don't and won't. Let us assume that women are rational economic actors. They make up half the population and in theory (yours anyway) half the workforce. If they are rational actors and (in your view equal in ability), then we would expect the opening of the Bakken Oil Fields (an entirely new job market) to see equal amounts of men and women showing interest in those high paying jobs. The reality is, we don't. The applicant pool is overwhelmingly male and thus the eventual wor…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:09 PM
1

Barbarians inside the gates. Notice how the surviving Tzarnaev child has as many rabid fangirls as any rock musician? How children of luxury abandon the easy life Europe to go join the ranks of ISIS? No, what's going to happen is that the populous blue states will become increasingly flooded with angry minority thugs and the pathetic spineless SJWs who defend them like Sweden on a larger scale, and then the red states (where the overwhelming majority of the nuclear stockpile you seem so proud of…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:18 AM
2

You didn't answer my question. What is the inherent purpose of trying to make your society survive as long as possible? Because when societies end the victors historically speaking enslave the losers that they don't kill. As happened to the inhabitants of Melos.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:06 AM
3

We're producing plenty of successor generations No, we aren't. This is a kind of heartless approach. "The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must." -Athenian general to the people of Melos Again, who cares? What benefit do people living in your society get based on how long it lasts? They experience the benefit of not experiencing what happens when a society ends. Which is what happened to Melos shortly after.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:01 AM
–

No, I'm arguing that although our society may have become less stable in some ways, it has become more stable in others such that it is, as a net result, more stable overall You may think that, but I disagree with your conclusion. A society which does not produce successor generations (as ours is failing to do) has no future and thus is not stable. A society that doesn't respect individual freedom isn't a society worth living in or contributing to Tell that to the Romans. Or the Greeks. Or the C…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:53 AM
0

An almost complete end to child labor. Has no causal relationship in any way to divorce. I mean there are thousands of ways our society has improved / gotten more stable in the past century or so. Nearly all of which are causally linked to technology and industrialization, and which were well in swing before liberalism and feminism came into vogue. Child labor was ended well before the 60's. Blowing up families for fun and profit didn't start until the 70's. The obligatory two income household d…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:39 AM
1

Well let's start with the obvious. Divorce.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:27 AM
0

There is no evidence that our society is any more unstable now than it ever was before Do you actually believe that horseshit or are you just hoping that others will?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:12 AM
1

You could just as easily ask exactly what modern men bring to the table that can't be sourced elsewhere for cheaper. Just as easily asked, but the answers are quite different. Let's take a trip through time shall we. Dawn of homo sapiens until about... oh, let's say the industrial revolution. For the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of human history, women have had intrinsic value (the capacity to reproduce), while men have been obliged to create value to be worth a woman. Men grew up, survived wars and ha…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:00 AM
1

Yes; but it's a pointless question. They don't exist. It is BECAUSE they don't exist that there used to be a legal and social structure in place to safeguard against unicorns not existing. Marriage was, for the most part, permanent, and women's value was tied to sexual virtue. So in the current legal and social atmosphere, my answer is no, I would not be interested. Simply because I have no way of knowing that a person is a unicorn and every reason to expect that they are not.
/r/askTRP10/05/15 09:38 PM
1

(squint) OOOOkay... so what is the catch than? Crazy? Post wall? Carouseller? Cat hoarder?
/r/askTRP10/05/15 08:58 PM
1

Would you want to be in a relationship with a woman like that? Is she attractive?
/r/askTRP10/05/15 08:41 PM
2

Girls brain's resemble young women's brain's a decade sooner then boys K-Selection In early civilization women were mated soon after sexual maturity. Men, on the other hand, generally weren't. Because a lot of them were busy being dead. Men reach physical maturity as quickly as women reach mental maturity, because those men would (historically) be immediately filed into ranks and sent to die, either in direct conflict or in professions where death was likely. They didn't need to be mentally matu…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:50 AM
1

It's simply another form of expectation. Women used to expect men to be a good long term investment as marriage was basically permanent. Now, it's more of an up-front thing, wanting the largest immediate return.
/r/askTRP09/05/15 04:33 AM
15

I will not destroy it for ten's sake. Genesis 18:32
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:29 AM
4

When people lie they often say the opposite of whats true. Thank you for clearing that up.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:41 AM
1

Keeping the Tories in power is not exactly the thing liberalists should cheer about. Even for the SNP its a bit of a mixed blessing. If you want to cheer about something, cheer for Plaid Cymru keeping all its seats. All three of them.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:26 PM
6

So... Irrelevant sub preemptively bans everone who has used another sub. I'm not sure if I care enough to suggest responding in kind.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:22 PM
11

OOOORRRR, just kick them out of the labor pool, take away their vote, and prohibit no-fault divorce.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 12:01 AM
3

Oh, yeah, that's worked not at all.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:46 PM
6

Education is the foundation of a strong society. It's really not. If you look back through history, the societies that prized liberalized academics tend to be flash in the pan. Successful, productive, enduring societies need discipline more than pure academic focus. Like China back when the civil service exams meant something. Investing in a general education in the populace beyond the basic skills of arithmetic and writing is generally a waste. We would be better with a stronger system of trade…
/r/askTRP07/05/15 11:31 PM
2

I don't hate women. I hate the system that caved to them a hundred odd years ago. They should never have been given agency because they will never carry the civic obligation to die for the protection of the collective whole. Their civic obligation is to live and perpetuate the collective whole.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 09:27 PM
3

I lived in the largest dorm in North America (Friley Hall, the building with its own zip code). If you weren't at the dryer when it stopped your stuff went on the top. Or the floor if the top was full already.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 03:24 PM
12

This is what the feminist movement has become, it's a religion now and it bullies heretics that won't convert Well... yeah. We've kinda been saying that for a while now. "The whole world will vilify us now, but I am still totally convinced that we did the right thing. Hitler is the archenemy not only of Germany but of the world." -Generalmajor Tresckow
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:46 AM
3

And if you think that's sums up I said, you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:15 PM
5

There is no way in hell I'm letting someone besides me launch my boat. How do you have nice things? Take care of the things you have.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 07:48 PM
9

feminism is capitalist No, it only appears that way on the surface. The actual effect of feminism is to make domestics and childrearing taxable by making you pay for them, and work for taxable wage to be able to pay for them. All while depressing labor prices by doubling the labor pool. Capitalism presuposes that the economic actors endeavour to use their personal capital and labor wisely. To get the best prices and minimize waste. It is significantly cheaper in terms of percent of household inc…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:25 PM
14

Feminism is authoritarian marxism. It endeavours to take work away from women that was untaxable, and make it taxable. To do this it promotes the false idea that women prior to feminism were somehow lacking power, when in reality what they had was independence from the state. Women's work as homemaker was untaxable and unregulatable. Homemaker women were as Galt as you can get. The "empowered" woman pays other people to be mother to her own children, and pays a tax to the government for that dub…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:11 PM
1

How did it go? I put six in an Eisenhauer dollar at five yards with my Ruger.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 12:50 PM
20

And yet, after all of this, you couldn’t understand why that bombshell in pom-poms wouldn’t answer your texts “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” -The one smart thing John Maynard Keynes ever said.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 09:20 PM
1

What does it look like? "Well, it looks like King's Cross Station. Only cleaner, and without all the trains." But no, having gone up to about roughly top 5% in income, I can say that there's basically no change (aside from, you know, driving a new car and paying a mortgage instead of rent). Just a lot less uncertainty, and I don't have to live on store brand bisquick like I did in college.
/r/askTRP03/05/15 02:29 PM
2

I do personally. Then good for you. To me it's like watching the fucking Belmont after the Preakness wipes out the triple crown. Get dressed up and spend a whole lot money for two and a half minutes of irrelevant horse racing.
/r/askTRP01/05/15 03:40 AM
1

Uh... You realize Bridgestone is Japanese, right? Firestone is just a brand label at this point.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:55 PM
2

Voat. Hell we probably should move to Voat now.
/r/askTRP28/04/15 04:48 PM
8

Better idea... Buy a whole bunch of illustrated books of boy who cried wolf, and donate then to hospital childrens wards. In her name.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:37 PM
26

so my question again is, are MGTOW just omegas who've swallowed the red pill, realised there position in life, and chose to give up? Bluntly, yes, but it's generally a little more complicated then that. In my experience the typical mgtow starts out as a nice guy ™ and as such is generally not unsalvageably hideous or untalented. The neckbeards are the exception, not the rule. But they respond to the red pill with, well, disgust. Not disgust for the message, but disgust for the situation. Yeah yo…
/r/askTRP18/04/15 02:40 AM
1

Those aren't my words. responsible for precipitating the crack war by creating a legal machine engineered to deprive black youth of fathers What about that don't you understand? I'm not gonna go into much depth on this when CaptainCapitalism already has. You don't understand it, go read some of his stuff.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:21 AM
2

and suddenly I'm a science denier Science never proves anything Your words, not mine. Luddite.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:14 AM
1

I'm not the science denier. Go to /r/Republican.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:56 AM
1

Science never proves anything You just lost. You can get off the internet now. You can put down your device or step away from your keyboard and go be amish because they exist and function because YOU ARE FLAT WRONG.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:41 AM
2

The only reason one would go into a sub like that and say "patriarchy doesn't exist" as a flat statement is to try and swing your dick around- it does not start a discussion and it does not bring greater understanding to either side So you acknowledge that yes, that behavior would get an account banned on that sub. Yet Bo_Gribbles came into our sub and did the reverse, and we haven't banned her. We're the tolerant ones. They aren't. We're the ones who are mature enough to have a conversation. Th…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:39 AM
4

Nope. In fact it was the way YOU did it that was sexist, by posting that it was to disprove a man. I want to prove him wrong Your words. You played on x2's innate sexism against men, and they cooperated. Your post made it clear that you were a woman, on their side, and you wanted to prove a man wrong. As they are inclined to do. Women will play nice when they know they've got an audience. It has been proven scientifically that women have an automatic own-group preference that men lack.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:35 AM
3

My anti-feminist friend insists that I'll get banned if I bring this up here, and I want to prove him wrong. When a woman says to other women that they're doing something to prove a man wrong, whether on reddit or in the real world, women play along. It has nothing to do with feminism, and everything to do with the nature of women. Oh yes. Men know all about that bullshit. You think it's clever, it's not. If you went on 2x with a fresh account with no indication of your gender, or indication of …
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:17 AM
5

I'm here Yeah. You're here. Because if you went into 2x and said you didn't believe in patriarchy theory they'd ban you in a minute.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:16 AM
5

Not all. Specific ones. Such as how means tested social assistance + no fault divorce = incentive to expel fathers Its not feminism's fault that moral hazard exists. But it is at fault for not taking it into account. But lets stick to something easy. Take... The ERA. The Equal Rights Amendment that feminists are banging on about now as the solution to all problems. It was close to ratification before. Know who opposed it? Feminists. Yes. Feminism opposed the ERA the last time it was up. Why? Bec…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:46 PM
2

Well, for starters, yes, they actually are. Feminism is unbelievably racist against black men and is responsible for precipitating the crack war by creating a legal machine engineered to deprive black youth of fathers.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:19 PM
2

How are people supposed to respond to a pogrom?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:24 PM
10

There will be no cooperation between the manosphere and feminism until so-called nice feminists drive the out and out man haters from their midst. You legitimize them. This will not happen of course because you don't control the ship, they do. No, it will end like denazification, when you and your like are forced to see with open eyes the damage you've wrought, the families that you've destroyed, and the lives you've ruined. When that day comes you and your like will be forced into a new Ironcla…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:00 PM
10

Fukkin chorf Yeah, it does sound better.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:14 AM
0

And yet, following today’s news, the same people who fawned over Scalzi erupted in outrage, apparently because some of the Sad and Rabid Puppies organisers and authors are identified as libertarians — or even, shock horror, conservatives. Starship Troopers won a Hugo. Would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:52 PM
3

Most chicks rarely talk shit about other people Uh, you ever been around two at the same time? Stab other women in the back when they aren't around is something all women do as often as they can get away with.
/r/askTRP01/04/15 12:13 AM
25

The researchers were then ceaselessly mocked. Not only for forgetting that correlation does not imply causation, but also for getting the causation ass backwards wrong... Is how it should have ended.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/15 03:03 AM
1

So? When they're in that frame of mind that is the time to agree with them, and hit them with the hard facts. Make it stick in their minds that they're right. Then watch and hit them with it again when they start to slip.
/r/askTRP30/03/15 07:29 PM
1

So? They're mgtow. At least they cease to be part of the problem.
/r/askTRP30/03/15 07:12 PM
17

we don't want to raise angry sociopaths That is why society used to take an active hand in pairing people off in their teens. Can't have it both ways. Want a stable society that doesn't produce sociopathic men? You have to enforce strict monogamy across the society. That means crushing the feminist rebellion against that very arrangement, in the name of preserving a stable society. Though I fear now it may be too late to do it without a real war.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 03:30 AM
5

Nooope. Already been in charge; of a lot of people, simultaneously. You know what it taught me? HERDING CATS is easier than leading people who have become convinced that all of life must be a democracy (and by democracy I mean they can expect to either have things their way or receive a consolation prize). "It's never been done before and I can see why. I mean, it's like stacking marbles in a corner. They are hip-deep in their own agendas and their own rivalries. Half of them won't even talk to …
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 12:36 PM
11

TRP is both pickup artistry AND mgtow. Don't forget that. TRP is just the awareness of sexual strategy; what the individual does with that knowledge is up to them. Some mgtow may very well live for the schadenfreude. I know I do. But it's not vengeance. It's just... like Steve Buscemi's character in Armageddon. Western civilization is so fucked right now that all you can really do is find a spot with shade and a view, sit down, have a drink, and wait for the shootin to start.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 11:11 PM
1

Oh. Well yeah. Crash Course World History is pro SJW.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:49 PM
3

Not at all. I'm sure the inhabitants of Melos did fight when the Athenians came ashore. But their resistance was as a bug opposing a shoe, one tiny island colony facing an Athenian invasion force that likely outnumbered it by an order of magnitude. The point, sir, was that the only real truth of politics is might makes right. That is true even today, even as the basis of feminism. The might of white knights are all that make feminism right in any way. By all means, fight for what you believe in.…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:56 AM
4

Look, "patriarchy theory" is bullshit. The Athenians gave a better explanation of gender dynamics over two thousand years ago in the Peloponnesian War... "The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must."
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:42 AM
4

Evolution does not give a damn about what you think about sexual dimorphism. Crom, on the other hand, laughs at your belief that it is a social construct. Laughs atop his mountain.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:27 AM
2

Consumerism? Maybe. Capitalism? No. Feminism requires the state to transfer wealth, but capitalism is opposed to the state doing so because it penalizes success at capitalism. A capitalist utopia has absolutely no social safety net, and consequently will be extremely traditionalist because women will overwhelmingly choose the optimal survival strategy (traditional monogamous marriage with the man as head of household).
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 02:28 PM
30

And not a giant Pavlovian experiment?
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 12:11 AM
1

To an extent. There is little that can be done to fix the damage liberalism has wrought. The whole system is going to have to fling itself apart now.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:41 PM
1

We should be talking about how to remove traditional gender roles Can't be done. Traditionalism represents the optimal solution to the distribution of power and responsibility, and how to address women's hypergamy in a way that is compatible with maintaining social order. Disrupt it, and it will eventually balance back out. Thought it may take decades or even centuries, though many millions of people may have to die in revolution and war, over the long run traditionalist societies ultimately pre…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:29 PM
1

I'm reading this and I'm envisioning a classroom goes dead silent trying to figure out if they're actually seeing what they're seeing, and then a loooong pause, and then off in the distance you can hear a hydrogen bomb go off. Like you're living a Stanley Kubrick movie.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:02 AM
5

They're past PNR that's for sure.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:29 PM
1

Its not a try. I want to see social justice derailed but I am pessimistic about the charge sticking.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:03 PM
1

A fraternity is neither a person nor a corporation.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:26 PM
1

"A woman has..." Are they sure? I mean, wow. Maybe they should check first before they put.. "her"... in general population.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:57 PM
1

... Sean Smith? Information Officer, US Embassy Libya? KIA Sep 11, 2012? Former member of the EVE Online CSM? Glenn Beck claiming that Goonswarm and SomethingAwful are fronts for the CIA? You'll have a much easier time opposing Hillary if you appeal to the gamergate crowd. Link her policies to anti-gaming social justice.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:44 PM
2

Remember Vile Rat.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:34 PM
15

Not men who play videogames all day Well, that much is easy. Ask if they have a job. and talk about the next marvel movie You're working from a false premise here that beta=nerd. I could turn this back and ask how to find a woman who doesn't spend at least an hour a day texting about either 50 Shades or Hunger Games. Red Pill is a state of mind, and quite frankly those who are enlightened about how to productively use their time, to improve themselves, are often not that easy to find because the…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 01:35 AM
1

Sure, like I said I understand the position the subreddit is in. But try to explain it to Thomas Jefferson.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:46 PM
2

You're not made a slave by the ban on advocacy of violence in this subreddit. I wasn't addressing that. I was talking about the broader implications of non violence as a response to oppression. I completely understand that YOUR position is that you have to parrot the "nope, no violence here" message to avoid retribution from reddit and society. I don't think that's true at all. Many social changes have taken place with minimal violence, or even none at all. Generally non-violence works in cases …
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:36 PM
1

You'd better count on the sandwich making gynoid. Because if direct violence is off the table then perfecting a replacement "better" woman via robotics about the only way we have to actually make gains against feminism.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:21 PM
1

"Peace is made in such ways." "SLAVES ARE MADE IN SUCH WAYS!"
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:09 PM
1

Franchise (historically de facto franchise via serving in the military; de jure voting franchise is relatively new even to men, but deciding TO or NOT to conduct a coup and behead the king is a form of voting, albeit a highly informal one). We gave men ballots in this country because we didn't want the economic disruption of voting with bullets (but a bullet still outvotes any quantity of ballots). But as long as the vote was contained to just those who would have wielded franchise through force…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:16 AM
2

traditionalism isn't the only way to keep hypergamy in check Fine. Describe your way then, and I'll tell you how it will fail. Removing "provider" requirements from men means that women will be forced to fend for themselves Traditionalism is self-repairing because women inevitably respond to adversity by doing more to win over men. It is their go-to solution for all problems. Men are predisposed to accept the currency nature provides women to offer them. I don't really care about "a stable socie…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:50 AM
-1

to subservient housewives that never where False. Traditionalism is the only known stable social structure. It is an equilibrium point, the compromise where female hypergamy is restricted in the interest of achieving some semblance of social order and securing the support and labor of most men. Societies which deny or reject it are ultimately crumble, because unrestrained hypergamy discourages men from being cooperative participants in society, while encouraging greater and greater amounts of wa…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:10 AM
1

But Pfaus said blaming pornography for ED is akin to blaming food if you have an eating disorder. Mentioning food and eating disorders in a story about how porn isn't the cause of ED...
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:22 AM
2

I watched a YouTube video from a YouTuber called "Girlwriteswhat" on disposability. Which broke my heart and I almost (no I did) start crying! The thing about that is that most men don't have that much of a problem with male disposability... if it comes with attendant privileges. While there are some men who don't want a return to traditionalism, quite a few WOULD accept traditionalism if women were held to their end of the bargain as they used to be. As GWW put it: "Traditionalism throws men un…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:56 PM
2

And if you choose do that and refrain from spewing fatlogic, if you own up to the fact that your life is what you make of it, then I'm not going to judge. Women calling it unreasonable for men to choose to avoid having sex with them because there are serious risks in doing so, are in the same boat as the obese claiming it's unreasonable that they can't have a great body and eat all the cake they want.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:35 PM
3

An individual's decision to not do something which they are not obliged to do is never unreasonable. You might as well ask if it is unreasonable for a person to never drink alcohol, or to never spend money on worthless crap they don't need.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:13 PM
2

We have to deal in absolutes. As soon as you start dealing in numbers you've abandoned principle. Consider the following excerpt from Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers... "Mr. Rico! " Now I was the victim. "Yes, sir. " "Are a thousand unreleased prisoners sufficient reason to start or resume a war? Bear in mind that millions of innocent people may die, almost certainly will die, if war is started or resumed. " I didn't hesitate. "Yes, sir! More than enough reason. " " ‘More than enough. ' Very…
/r/askTRP11/03/15 03:23 AM
1

The second you slip up they have the means to use the state to destroy you. No one will take your side. So then you don't have any personal experience per say I didn't acknowledge your question because it is irrelevant. If I say I have it would be used against me by someone and if I say I haven't you'll clearly use that against my argument. What I have or haven't experienced has no bearing on whether the point I made is right or wrong. Do I know more than you can possibly imagine? Do I know next…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 10:30 PM
-1

I know the law.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 10:26 PM
2

BDSM is very red pill if done right No, it is not. Not in this legal environment. Consider Steve Irwin. Professional animal handler. Very confident, very careful, expert in working with aggressive animals. Thought that experience would translate to underwater... and got stabbed in the heart by a stingray. Dead in seconds. BDSM can turn on you as fast as the stingray.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 04:10 PM
1

Does this relate to feminism? Only in the sense that feminism makes this sort of stuff more likely. In a variety of ways.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:50 PM
1

TBH, of the various reboots being proposed, MsGyver (MaeGyver?) is actually not that bad of an idea. At least compared to an all-woman Ghostbusters. The basic premise of MacGyver, that there's nothing more dangerous than an clever mind, isn't itself all that gendered. MacGyver was exceptional only in his knowledge of applied science and DIY problem solving. If Sci-Fi channel had come up with it like 10 years ago, not as part of a SWJ narrative, I'd probably have watched the first few episodes to…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:58 PM
3

Went to Panda Express for lunch, got a fortune cookie with two fortunes in it. Both of them were about money, and both of them turned out to be accurate within a couple days.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 03:36 AM
12

This is why traditionalism is superior. When men are legally first class citizens and women aren't, when men hold paid jobs and women don't, every man is somewhat alpha.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:16 PM
4

All they want is more access to information about those accused. To turn these into show trials. If they were actually for fixing the system they would advocate leaving punishing crimes to the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 06:41 PM
1

Well if you're certain of it then would that extent be?
/r/askTRP24/02/15 03:29 PM
1

So you agree?
/r/askTRP24/02/15 03:10 PM
1

Whatever are you talking about?
/r/askTRP24/02/15 03:04 PM
1

More or less. Although if ISIS succeeds in restoring the Ottoman Empire, or if Japan perfects gynoids, things will change.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 02:30 PM
3

Well... then make it so. Go on. I'm waiting.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 10:27 PM
2

what would happen in a magical world where I had a 100% female compliance rate Uh, that's the world we used to live in, up until beta men gave up the legal capacity to resort to stick when carrot doesn't work.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 09:16 PM
2

Iowa State University History 316 History of Medieval Europe 300-1500
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 06:06 PM
4

No it is actually known that the French coined the term as a kind of gallows humor pun on Edward's ruthless practice of total war, and his hypocritical fascination with chivalry.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 05:45 PM
7

The concept of chivalry was bullshit. Edward, the Black Prince of Wales. Chiefmost cheerleader of chivalry in the era of its decline... Burned Bordeaux to the ground while using his cavalry to keep the people from getting out. Then went on a sacking spree across all of Armagnac. The next year he started again, hitting Bourges, then Tours, and then Poitiers, in the most brutal and civilian focused raids of the Hundred Years War. The French went so far as to coin a term for it; chevauchee, which l…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 02:23 PM
1

Ignore the past and look forward to the future. That's the thing though. Our society is on a trajectory. All we've gained is knowing what it is, we don't have the delta-v to avoid it entirely. We can do nothing, or we can try to hasten it and in so doing become pariahs and martyrs. But either way things are going to get much worse before they get any better.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 02:37 AM
1

I don't like 1984 as much as I like Harrison Bergeron and Starship Troopers, but I will say that 1984 does a better job of addressing what you're getting at. The problem is the successful society's surplus. In a war surplus doesn't exist. National projects like the new deal and the five year plans can use surplus but they can't sustain the demand for the surplus over a sustained period of time like a war with an enemy can. Nor can competitions like the space race. Now, surplus can be managed thr…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:54 PM
1

I'll upvote that. I think there's more of a progression to it then you're describing though, that secularism tends to set in to successful religious societies.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:25 PM
1

You're prejudicing the liberalism with your use of "moving forward". It does not matter that it is inefficient. The sexual id does not care about efficiency. The birth rate in western liberalized societies is in free fall because traditionalism has be abandoned. Eventually, the west will be vulnerable as the population shrinks, and more traditionalist societies will prevail over the depopulated liberalized ones. Until they too age and liberalize and are replaced.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:46 PM
1

Every period of rapid social change has its crash. We will have ours.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:41 PM
2

You're discounting sexuality. Men and women are different. Period. Women's sexuality will rebel against homogenity. Taking away the incentive for men to participate and contribute to community and fostering social strife. Perhaps it is cyclical. But the liberalised, homogenous society is not stable because it is in conflict with women's sexual selection process.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:28 PM
1

I never said it wouldn't.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:26 PM
2

Traditionalism, fully realized, is a very stable social order. It placates the people the system has the most need to placate. What we are seeing in the west right now is NOT a stable system. Liberalism will not endure. It will crumble into traditionalism, or be conquered by a traditionalist empire.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:50 PM
1

"What's your name?" "Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, you may thank this woman for shafting you out of your ticket money." Drop the mic, wall off stage.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:59 PM
3

Then you're an idiot white knight and deserve to be taken for all you've got. She's using you. If she was actually interested in you she wouldn't be indirect.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 03:00 AM
2

Stay below until the noise stops.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 02:59 AM
3

Ok so what is the best response? Run silent, run deep.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 02:55 AM
4

If there was any possibility of that happening you wouldn't be on /r/asktrp asking us whether you should do her fucking homework.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 02:52 AM
13

What's his angle? WHAT'S YOUR ANGLE? No. You don't owe her jack shit.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 02:43 AM
1

I'm not going to suggest anything. Its your life.
/r/askTRP15/02/15 03:51 PM
0

Well, all I'll say is this: A person who has resolved to die has a freedom to his actions that a person who wants to live does not. Throughout history, some of the most pivotal moments have hinged on such people.
/r/askTRP15/02/15 03:46 PM
7

I've thought about this very question a lot. I have an answer for you. Schadenfreude. I wake up every morning because I believe that one day the feminists who have destroyed this country will get theirs. When that day comes, I'll be there laughing; perhaps I'll even survive it, and see the world that comes after. It's not much to live for, but it is enough. "Towards thee I roll, thou all-destroying but unconquering whale; to the last I grapple with thee; from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hat…
/r/askTRP15/02/15 03:26 PM
4

Do you masturbate?
/r/askTRP14/02/15 03:03 AM
1

That risk of conscription (a risk that women will never face to the extent that men do) be a criteria for franchise.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 11:42 PM
28

In my experience the more you learn about the speed of light, the less sense it makes. Its a not thing, defined by the speed it moves through nothing. When it moves through more than nothing it isn't slowing down, just taking a wonky route. Except it can't because being not a thing it can't have a route it just changes the group velocity and envelope and front velocity (not the same way at the same time)....... Better to burn all the books and go back to feudalism. Its hard to beat "deus vult" f…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 05:11 PM
34

It is to some extent a class issue. Or more precisely a lack of class issue. In the 19th century legally protected class divisions like slavery and indentured servitude were abolished and franchise offered to all men. Instantly ethnic minority men became legally senior to all women. This precipitated the women's lib movement, which, though fair sounding, was based on the somewhat racist notion that black men being able to vote was an affront to white women who couldn't. The idea that gender role…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 03:35 PM
1

Utah and North Dakota would nullify it. Probably others too but those two are certain. The people looking for a fight would have financial incentive to relocate. The risks of civil war would increase greatly.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:16 PM
12

"It is more important that innocence should be protected, than it is that guilt be punished. For guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that all of them cannot be punished. When innocence itself is condemned the subject will exclaim 'it is immaterial to me whether I behave well or ill, for virtue iself is no security.'." John Adams, second president of the United States
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:12 PM
3

realized that half of what you guys are talking about is based on Neitzche's ideals, and yet alot of it is slightly off No, it's based on Schopenhauer's ideas, which Neitzche paraphrased. Though I'm glad you're taking the opportunity to read at least something philosophical.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:21 PM
3

The reason does not matter, the result is the same. Scarcity. But you are correct that FAs lack a proper sense of their worth, and that is problematic because it makes them easily duped.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 04:22 AM
14

FA and MGTOW are just part of a spectrum. Same result, different reasoning. We should not discourage or mock people for leaving the SMP. Them doing so does the community some good in furthering the eventual market correction in SMV.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 12:35 AM
5

To keep it simple, right now we are living in an SMV bubble. It has been growing for a long time. Eventually there is going to be a market correction. It is already in the process of happening, but so far it has been kept relatively quiet. It is known that the birth rates and marriage rates are in freefall, and women are swinging from greed to fear, but the age at which that is happening has not yet started to fall. It is being propped up by a great many things, not the least of which is college…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 07:56 PM
0

Inferior is a bad term to use. Women are inferior to men qualitatively. In virtually every capacity, physical or mental, both the max and mean of men's ability exceeds that of women. So no matter what, if you are heterosexual and male, the math says you're dating an inferior. Now, with regards to SMV. Dubois: "Is value a relative or an absolute?" Rico: "An absolute." Dubois: "Wrong. Value has no meaning other than in relation to living beings." SMV is relative, not absolute. The problem we have …
/r/askTRP05/02/15 01:50 PM
1

"Then you don't need me. Gentlemen."
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:48 AM
0

-_- Thank you for clearly stating what was fucking obvious.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:46 PM
2

why does rp fear marriage? it is fear of having your life fucked up ahould things not work out So why did you ask your original question?
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:31 PM
1

Yes. We used to send kids to fat camp.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 03:15 AM
2

I have to ask, why the hell would you ever want that much energy doing that? We used to. And the world used to be a better place.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 12:51 AM
2

Also, you can't shame someone into not being obese No, I agree you can't. And that isn't what I'm advocating. I'm advocating pushing back the boundaries of political correctness in the everyday world to make the world overtly oppressive, openly hateful of the obese. Everyone already is. I'm saying tear down the political correctness wall and say what everyone is thinking. ... "You are not human." I don't mean to shame them into not being obese. I mean to make everyone who might become obese terr…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 12:41 AM
1

Sounds like two sides of the same coin. Essentially. As I see it what TRP really needs to do is go all in on fat shaming. Make the message be "Improve yourself, shame those who refuse to". Obesity (both in men and women but particularly women) is half the problem to begin with.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 12:29 AM
1

Well as I see it it means having a minimum standard and not compromising on that. I live in Iowa, which is a post apocalyptic wasteland with regard to obesity (at least in the cities; in the amish settlements it's better). I know two women I consider physically attractive, one is married, I'm friends with her husband and their kids call me uncle. The other isn't into men, and is so narcissistic it wouldn't last even if she was. Even just walking in public spaces (malls, bars, even jogging trails…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 12:17 AM
3

This just follows from him not being desired. When women desire men they make it apparent that the drop of a hat is all it would take.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:50 PM
7

... I think this is why a good many men go mgtow. I don't diagree with you in principle, but not everyone has the resolve to choose leave it over take it. Its bad for the cause, and they should be shamed for it, but that's a very good way to become regarded as another lunatic fringe movement. If we advocate a "no compromise, expect the best" attitude, the simple fact is a great many men will be left out of the rain and see trp as no more helpful to them than feminism, if not worse. Only market p…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 07:49 PM
8

If you aren't in the SMV 1% to begin with, they aren't and won't. If young attractive women were throwing themselves at men in equitable fashion and producing stable marriages we wouldn't be having this conversation. No, for the typical man a relationship is about supplication and work, he isn't "desired".
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:04 PM
3

Single young women are doing better than single young men. Taxes will hit the women harder than the men because of it. Attempts to gender the tax code will not survive the courts.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:00 PM
10

And the typical woman will?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 02:54 PM
14

Go over to /r/mensrights , they're the ones leading the charge on that front.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 06:16 PM
-21

Intactivism is just Antisemitism by another name.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 04:07 PM
2

Does it matter? As questions go, "why" is useless. The important question is "how should I react to it?"
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:51 PM
1

I guess that really depends on how much you agree with Malthus.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:00 PM
2

What is it that causes the men to depart that early? Bullets. Dying young pulls down the average a lot.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:48 PM
-20

Generally I support /r/MensRights, however... If endorsing circumcision gives us the narrative and moral high ground (however flimsy) to get down to business and nuke insurrectistan off the map, then I'm all for it. Mind you I'm an atheist. But if theocracy is the only way to start fighting TO WIN then fuck it, deus vult.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:14 AM
1

This is precisely why I said revolver. A shrouded SP101 or J Frame (with a disabled lawyerlock) cannot jam. Cannot be forced out of battery. Cannot be safe. You squeeze the trigger you WILL get a hammer strike on a primer. No Glock, really no semi automatic at all, will ever be as reliable.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 03:29 PM
-1

There are many many martial art and self-defense systems out there to choose from. Such as bobbed and shrouded revolvers. Which are about the simplest and most foolproof firearms there are.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 11:54 PM
3

America, and I could outfit a fireteam. ..... If it came to that...
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 09:21 PM
-2

Still applies.
/r/askTRP10/01/15 01:12 PM
-1

Ohio State will do anything to win won't they... typical Big 10.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:26 AM
0

Any recommendations? For now I'd rather go for some basic self-defense S&W 638 or 649 "This is a stainless steel version of the rather odd, S&W model 49. Despite it’s antiquated basic design, limited capacity, and unimpressive power, this might be among the most politically incorrect of all firearms. At least it would be, if more people were aware of it’s design, and mission. To the uninitiated, this is simply an oddly shaped, sort of freakish revolver. The hump backed model 49 fires the .38 Spe…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 05:11 AM
-2

revert to celibacy And exactly how does that work? Time travel?
/r/askTRP10/01/15 04:45 AM
-2

I'd be inclined to think he's on his side first. I'm not entirely convinced he even has that much of a self to have a side. "High functioning autistic" might be too strong of a description to apply to him, but I think his brain works on lyrics and class clown-ing like Hawking's works on math.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:06 AM
1

How? Unequal application of the law with respect to gender. By whom? Generally by other men. So why fix it? Because it's contrary to our country's founding principles. I am skeptical of the men's rights movement. Take it or leave it.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:52 AM
3

Catfaqs. It's like Carfax except less useful.
/r/askTRP06/01/15 11:13 PM
-1

The gatekeepers on here apparently say it is. It's basically the same situation as /r/KotakuInAction insisting that GamerGate is about journalistic ethics.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 11:09 PM
7

Trudeau should have called it quits when Breathed did. Bloom County was always better.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:25 PM
2

Necessity trumps equality. What I find interesting is how feminists are pushing a war that is dangerous to their own interests. America has never "won" a world police type war, and times that didn't feel like losses (Korea and Yugoslavia) did not preserve the map intact. Yet we feel obliged to try fighting IS... to preserve the borders of Iraq. We can't win that. We can only "win" by partitioning the factions off from each other as in Yugoslavia and Korea, or win outright by changing the mission…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:21 PM
6

"The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy. To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself. Thus the good fighter is able to secure himself against defeat, but cannot make certain of defeating the enemy. Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it." -Sun Tzu, The Art of War The pickup a…
/r/askTRP01/01/15 05:14 AM
1

It occurred to me reading this that the "success" of feminism in the United States and Britain has made it impossible to activate the draft for any reason. That they can't risk attempting to coerce men into fighting because of the enormous risk of them deciding to instead fight the people doing the coercing.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 04:55 AM
1

Trudeau should have taken a hint when Breathed packed it in and done the same.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:18 PM
2

No, I'm saying the population of the country is going to become predominately mennonite and they will change the laws accordingly. You take it as a given that no fault divorce won't be undone. I don't. If the majority if the country is voting amish a great many laws will change, divorce being least among them. Amlets don't vote for democrats. They vote for the Bob Vander Plaats type of republicans.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:22 PM
1

We are never going back to fault divorce. You're ignoring that the only demographic in the US that is reproducing above replacement rates is the amish. Within fifty years they will be the majority in the midwest. In a hundred they'll be the largest group in the country.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:18 PM
2

No. What will happen in 2015 is that ISIL will continue to expand its territory.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:24 PM
1

You still have not pointed out where I wrote anything about what I want.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:18 AM
1

I don't recall writing anything to the effect of what I want. Perhaps you could point it out.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:15 AM
1

from people like you Oh really, and what kind of person is that? Aren't ad hominem and unfounded insinuation SJW tactics?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:10 AM
1

I don't see you disproving, or even for that matter disagreeing.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:04 AM
-1

The feminists have to keep moral outrage fixated on this because its how they maintain their cartel on sex and continue producing women who enroll in college and take women's studies. If the laws were altered to make sex between sexually mature but legally underage teenage women and adult men legal, feminism would collapse almost instantly.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:57 AM
2

And the beta gets the girl in the end. PLANETES is different. Hachi knocks up crippled Tanabe, leaves her with his mom, and then goes to Jupiter with his dad for 7 years. For that matter Wings of Honnêamise is also different. Shirotsugh tries to force himself on Riquinni, she bashes him in the skull, later forgives him, and then he becomes the first man in space. Odd. Seems like all the hard sci-fi series (even Moonlight Mile) take a cue from The Right Stuff and go out of their way to depict ast…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 02:09 AM
2

PLANETES. Can't explain why in a few sentences, you'll just have to watch it. However, this is the moment Hachi breaks through the wall. You're Under Arrest is absolutely NOT a red pill show but it has an extremely red pill character. Daimaru Nakajima (Ken Nakajima's dad), who is there basically to illustrate how much of a pushover beta Ken is. It's actually kinda confusing, both Natsumi and Miyuki are feminist caricatures, and yet they still more or less accurately depict Miyuki as disgusted by…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 01:39 AM
4

And any seasoned TRP'er who's read the sidebar knows that we are not here to try to "change the world" or return society to sexual norms gone by in the past. At least not through deliberate action. Would the world be changed if all men internalized TRP? Certainly. It would very quickly start to look like the way the world was.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 04:32 PM
1

I don't want children. I want to retire I'm on a Boat rich and watch the country go to downhill. I'm on track to do that. Since, you know, I can't see my real dream happening anytime soon.
/r/askTRP24/12/14 09:55 PM
6

"If there was a machine that could do all these tasks." It would be invented by men. It would also be much more complicated than a machine that can keep house and ****.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:44 PM
1

That is certainly the rule for women. But for men there's more to it. Motivation varies between those who aren't successful, and those who are. Both are self fulfilling prophecies. Side note, kinda hoping S&P 500 hits 2100 this week. That'd be pretty awesome.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 10:26 PM
1

Just gonna say from experience, being "I'm on a boat" rich isn't all its cracked up to be, at least if you're self made.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 07:34 PM
28

Put a dixieland horn in your car.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 10:33 PM
2

SPACE WEATHER! Thanks Ollie. No. Our behavior is not influenced by the motions of the planets. You could make the case that there's something to Strauss-Howe generational theory, but anything beyond that (astrology, numerology, etc) is just... well... idiot game.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 03:07 AM
4

First of all, they must stop pursuing romances based on physical attraction and charm. Men should return to the long-forgotten practice of using discernment to weed out lovely but litigious partners and instead seek out healthy relationships based on character, similar interests, values and goals. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA No. In that "long forgotten" time, women were on average skinnier then they are today. Men judged on non-physical traits because the average available woman was at least physically a…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:25 PM
-1

The reasonably intelligent among them are beginning to realize that there is no way this is going to end well. They want to pull out of the nosedive, but they aren't at the controls.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:46 AM
1

How about you read the material.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter