TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pitiful_Home5655 Archive

View 0 posts and 305 comments by Pitiful_Home5655 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

if they're dl they're not straight do you think that having these experiences as an adult is comparable to having them during your formative years? were you regularly sexually harassed from even before puberty onward?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:39 PM
–

not really, just rejecting a factually incorrect statement. straight men don't feel entitled to your body, and frankly i think it's a bit insulting to suggest that you truly know what that's like. i don't reject the assertion that you're a woman. you can do whatever you want with your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:25 PM
–

our 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 01:51 PM
5

It's not semantics. Your primary claim in the post is that attraction isn't driven by merit, and then simultaneously claim that if you're not having any luck, that doing things to increase your merit will increase your chances. I have no qualms with the word choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 12:58 PM
4

If you succeed, great. If you don’t, either improve what you bring to the table Attraction isn't a meritocracy Pick one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 12:38 PM
–

I am afforded the ability to be confident because I have almost always had a fallback if the loneliness ever got too strong, even if that's a bleak and dehumanizing way to put it. My point was that I don't know many guys who can say the same, if any at all. Surely that's part of the reason why you don't hear women complaining about being single as much as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 05:00 PM
–

Not especially. Perhaps slightly above average but not by much. I'm content.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:48 PM
–

At no point in my adult life whenever I've been single have I ever felt like I had zero options to turn to, had I wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:38 PM
5

The same is true in reverse so I don't see a reason to make this a gendered thing. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 05:58 PM
0

I don't think it's true that being a monster will get you 'better' results, but rather that staying on the straight and narrow also doesn't do so. Even Adolf Hitler had a wife who ultimately laid down her life in a suicide pact with him. It's nearly exclusively about having a commanding presence, much moreso than it is about actually being a good person. People who are so good that they have a commanding presence sheerly from their goodness alone are unicorns. I guess maybe someone like Robin Wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 05:43 PM
3

Real-time society-scale prisoner's dilemma. Obviously if every guy on the planet stepped back into a slightly more passive role, the playing field would be leveled. Good luck convincing every guy on the planet to do that. At the individual level this is relationship suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 03:10 PM
3

You too. Everyone should get to experience it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 02:51 PM
2

In many parts of the world slavery is still common practice so lets just keep drilling into the heads of all westerners that people need to stop owning slaves as if they have any bearing on that whatsoever
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 01:54 PM
9

Oh, good. Footnotes for half the population, exclusively within other categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:26 PM
–

Largely meaningless if the average girl rates the average guy one or two points lower than his own self-rating and the average guy rates the average girl one or two points higher than her own self-rating. Simply believing that you are average amongst your own in-group doesn't mean that you believe that said average is correlative to the average of the out-group.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:19 PM
20

I only added that part to preemptively address the inevitable misogynistic comments that would assert that I, a woman, cannot lodge a grievance about a system or dynamic that women created, or else that would be hypocritical. It was always a loud minority of people screaming "never approach" and many women like myself as well as many more men have suffered because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:18 PM
–

asking this user to not be disingenuous is like asking the ocean to be still
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:02 PM
80

The last part is really what I lamented growing up as a somewhat attractive but shy girl. The creepy, over-assertive guys who don't care about what women think ignored what they were told and violated boundaries, and the cute, kind, respectful guys that I liked did what they were told and kept to themselves. I know, I know: "stupid foid you should have just approached them yourself" I get it now when looking back, but again, I was just a dumb shy kid. Hindsight is 20:20. C'est la vie.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:02 PM
0

contentless rhetoric. who is this mystery nebraskan?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:36 PM
–

Out of ~10k total, you are so laughably disingenuous 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 01:29 PM
1

So are men happy being considered attractive but no one wants to be around him? Purposeless hypothetical. People who are attractive will generally have people that want to be around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 01:21 PM
1

I don't think living together is necessary to know whether we're compatible. Living together is necessary to know whether you're compatible. Some of my worst living arrangements were with some of my best friends that I absolutely love as people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 01:01 PM
3

I see posts about it like a hundred times a month on TwoX soooo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 06:06 PM
1

I'm not the same person or even a man at all but I do have several brothers and it's been a few days without a response so I guess I'll answer on his behalf. Yes, you're totally understanding it. As a personal example, long ago my brothers would be helping my dad with some building project all day long outdoors in the winter and they were understandably cold and tired and they're only kids too. My brother asked if he could go home for the day and get some supper. Our dad, overworked as he was al…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:40 PM
2

not sure why you'd expect anything thought provoking to come out of the mouth (or hands in this case, i guess) of someone with a flair like that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:05 PM
1

I think you're both mistaken personally because it sounds like you're describing dorks 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 01:40 PM
3

I totally agree with that. My point is that if you're trying to push that reasoning "by the numbers" there's almost always going to be a male statistic that looks even more grim.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:28 PM
3

12000-13000 men are murdered every year in the US. Let's not play this numbers game.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:39 PM
-1

Someone, I've since lost track of who exactly it was (in the context of dating apps) made a point that really summed it up pretty well. It was a spin on the desert vs. swamp thing. Even if we make the extreme assumption that 99.9% of your options on dating apps are utter dogshit, and only one in a thousand people you see are attractive to you, mesh with your values/hobbies/beliefs, are within your age range, etc.; 1/1000 people are someone you could genuinely live a fulfilling life with. Under t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 04:02 PM
4

unreal goalpost shift, what are we even doing here
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:04 PM
1

If the patriarchy is all of those things listed then surely you agree that we're not living in one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:01 PM
2

Well put. If you haven't read this piece from the Slate Star Codex, it's worth a few minutes of your time, specifically Section II. And here I was, tried my best never to be mean to anyone, pursued a productive career, worked hard to help all of my friends. I didn’t think I deserved to have the prettiest girl in school prostrate herself at my feet. But I did think I deserved to not be doing worse than Henry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:23 PM
1

Presumably because one of the most prominent default responses to people listing their credentials and asking what they're doing wrong is to tell them that they're probably not as good of a person as they think they are, when in reality 'being a good person' is not actually a prerequisite that's set in stone even if it were the case that they weren't one, which it's probably not anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:19 PM
5

Disingenuous responses aren't welcome here. Less than four percent of US couples are poly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:11 PM
9

If you're going into a normal monogamous marriage with the idea that both you and your partner will no longer have any sexual partners besides each other and then you unilaterally decide that sex is now permanently on whatever lackluster schedule you personally deem it to be then you're kind of a bad person. Nobody should be forced to have sex but you and someone else literally entered into a contract, part of which says "you cannot have sex with anyone but me". There's some sort of loose obliga…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:00 PM
2

I've seen other women say that they will deliberately pay on a date they're not enjoying to non-verbally send a signal of "Dude, I don't need you. Let's not do this again". I think that's hugely immature instead of just using your words, but if those are the vibes that a non-marginal number of ladies are putting out, sooner or later the guys out there will catch on and begin to think that any woman who insists on paying for herself is doing it for reasons other than.... simply wanting to pay for…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 12:44 PM
2

Sure, there are definitely ones who are just vile human beings and know exactly what they're doing, but I still think it comes from the hubris developed by a life of never having to worry about being clocked in the jaw. Even the ones who are doing it with explicit malice and an intentional "damned if you do, damned if you don't" pinning are primarily that way because their brain has been trained by the fact that there will be no consequences (because most of the time, there won't be).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 12:36 PM
3

I don't know that they necessarily feel "entitled" to, moreso that their brain literally has no comprehension of the consequences that could follow. Even when you hear her say something like "what are you going to do, you can't hit a woman", it's easy to see that and call it arrogance, but chances are that she genuinely does believe what she's saying. Her brain has genuinely written a pathway that says "a man can't hit me back because everyone says he can't and he never has" in the same way that…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:27 PM
3

18-44 is a range so massive that the findings are basically useless. The "majority" of people in that age range also own a house. What percent of that majority do you think are in the 18-27 range?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:11 PM
1

I didn't assume either of those things, I just commented on the fact that societal trends by nature are generally unplanned
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 12:13 PM
1

I think there are too many categories skipped in this diagram altogether. I would put him above any of the others shown in 'HTN' and below most of the ones in chadlite. He does come off as unkempt a lot of the time though, so maybe it wouldn't be a stretch to put him up there otherwise, idk. I think the chart as a whole is fairly accurate, but some more granularity would help. Adam Sandler and Hamudi in the same category is wild too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 03:28 PM
2

Radcliffe in HTN lollll
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:24 PM
7

there doesn't need to be secret hooded cabal meetings where everyone goes over "the plan" in order to implicitly trend towards the same things over time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:20 PM
6

Should people need to punch down to "have options"? Shouldn't average men be paired with average women? What other charity work should the average man do? Maybe go volunteer at a fire station or an animal shelter every day? Pick up trash on the side of the highway?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:41 PM
1

You're mistaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:17 PM
1

I don't know what to tell you. There's a sliver of truth to it, it makes no sense to deny it. If anything it's cruel to the people with zero potential to lie and tell them that they have any. Some people were simply failed by society, failed by their parents, failed by nature, etc. Sorry to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 01:57 PM
2

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:43 PM
3

people who are genuinely happy don't feel the need to go around announcing how happy they are all the time. it appears that you're looking for either permission or validation to be happy single.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:36 PM
6

oh joy, he now gets to experience all of the various milestones of life with someone who isn't even attracted to him at a baseline level and wouldn't have even given him a second look ten years prior. yippee. Can't say I blame these dudes for being bitter about people trivializing genuine love and attraction like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:05 PM
0

obviously not, that's the whole point
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 02:05 PM
17

Conversely, it's also possible that a child who is bullied relentlessly during their formative years (especially right before and during puberty) may literally become physically stunted or "uglier" due to excessive levels of stress hormones like cortisol partially suppressing the distribution of HGH within the body. Resilient as the body is, it's still very difficult to bounce back from that down the line, if not outright impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:32 PM
8

if treating women well and making them happy were prerequisites to relationships/sex then all the andrew tates of the world would be incels but they're not though
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:12 PM
1

No. Valuing a man based on how much sex he has (i.e. if you regularly use 'virgin' or 'incel' as insults) does not directly "promote rape culture", but it definitely does reinforce the objectification of women as a prize or something to be conquered. If a man isn't accumulating enough pussy (as a commodity), then that's a moral failing or a sign of a deficiency in his character? Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:50 PM
1

apex fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 02:42 PM
1

If someone was getting a decent bit of attention/dating success by simply existing in public, they wouldn't have any need for any of the apps. How many women do you know who fit that bill? How many men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:08 PM
6

In the same way that you could say "The top 1% of earners in the united states hold 31% of all wealth" without ever pointing to any specific identifier of those people, so too can you say that "The top 1% of like-earners on Hinge earn 16.4% of all likes from women" without ever pointing to any specific identifier of those guys. OP isn't making any claim as to what a "top man" actually consists of, they're only speaking to their proportionality with relation to the userbase as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:01 PM
1

Which they don't, generally. This is a needless distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:20 PM
1

laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:18 PM
0

Why not, though? You kind of didn't answer their question at all, and their answer was that it would depend on the reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:01 PM
–

tourist alert
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:46 PM
–

Nearly every woman on here of any self-ascribed pill, blue, red, pink, black(?) etc. will tell you that this is the case though. It's definitely 5% of men or less that I'm attracted to, and the same is true most of them, too. There's nuance in the fact that our 5%'s will never be a perfect overlap with anyone else's, but it's just simply statistically untrue to say that women find men as a whole anywhere near as attractive as men find women as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:10 PM
–

it is if the other person has no interest in also giving it a fair try
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:09 PM
1

JUST the dating dynamics, nothing biological? Why would I ever want to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 04:09 PM
1

r/nothingeverhappens
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:25 PM
2

Fool's errand. If she didn't want you at the gym, she wouldn't want you at a bar or a club or a concert. A guy she's truly very attracted to could approach her wherever and still have a good chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:21 PM
1

yeah it's something like strawman strawman goomba fallacy strawman something like that mhm
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:35 PM
3

The "average guy" is the "unselected man". 63% of Gen Z men are single.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:38 PM
0

An attractive man is more likely to be in a relationship at any given time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:15 PM
2

rent free
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:27 PM
0

Obviously not. You'd have to be a maniac to want to be a mid guy in his late twenties in current year.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:42 PM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:29 PM
1

It's one of the most pointless humiliation rituals of all time for the majority of guys. If a guy is attractive enough to where a cold approach would work more than like 10% of the time, then he's probably also attractive enough to not need to cold approach to begin with. Conversely, if he isn't, then a cold approach is going to have a success rate that hovers at roughly 0%. It's not really an 'alternative route to women'; if you're not having any success on dating apps, it's extremely unlikely …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:49 PM
1

holding men to a higher standard is somehow because people hate women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 03:26 PM
0

I think the difference here is that just about everyone is universally open to calling raging gamers little pissbaby manchildren and the same can't be said of women's outbursts quite as much across the board. You see a video of a woman keying her man's car or destroying his playstation and *most* of the comments disavow it and make fun of her, but there's a non-marginal subset of "what did he do"'s and "he probably deserved it"'s. You see a video of a man punching a hole in drywall and I challen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 03:00 PM
1

If anything, I feel like I've historically seen more HLF than HLM there. Just now I went there, autoscrolled for like 5 seconds, and then did ctrl-f "hlf" and then "hlm". 64:42 in this anecdotal example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:32 PM
2

If you do your job well enough you can get away with browsing/posting on the clock. Ask me how I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:23 PM
1

On the individual level, sure. But, if two different women see the same guy, one puts him in the first group and the other puts him in the third, how do you assess where he actually stands? Do you just take the word of whichever of the two women is more attractive? More well-adjusted? More interested in hookups vs. settling down? Now increase the number of women to a hundred or a thousand. If you average all of their ratings of him together, he's almost certainly going to wind up in the middle c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 02:25 PM
1

So why specify?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:11 PM
1

Why specify at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:50 PM
2

Unless you think that murdering a rapist is an equally evil act as murdering a random person walking down the street, then you already implicitly understand that the "evilness" of an action must be based on the totality of circumstances and not just the action itself in a vacuum. It goes without saying that I felt dumbstruck upon hearing this—I almost wanted to throw up. You aren't actually seeking an answer to the question in the title of your post. You've already made up your mind on the matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:48 PM
0

Damning.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:40 PM
1

Should've just stuck with the first half of your title. "Women are out-earning men but still almost exclusively looking for men who out-earn them" is at least an interesting topic that doesn't come up all that often on this sub. Obviously everyone is going to scrutinize your second claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:14 PM
2

From a scientific standpoint, women and men both are in their peak fertility in their 20s. This is not up for debate. People choosing to have fewer children isn't relevant to the primary claim of your post in the slightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:23 PM
0

nothing burger response. sexuality is immutable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:16 PM
2

Wow, you mean rich and famous people have other people do their finances because it's easier and saves time that way and they have the money to blow on someone to manage their money? Must be the patriarchy. How has it in any way benefited women? If her allotted spending money each month is more than she can reasonably spend per month and her net worth behind the scenes is in the double-digit millions, then I must assume that you're intentionally acting dense here.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:37 PM
2

Is negging sexual assault?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:17 PM
–

I think you ought to add the caveat that this applies mostly to women who engage in or have engaged in casual sex outside of a relationship more than a couple of times. There are plenty of women who just simply have a timeframe structure that they're looking for and won't compromise on just because a guy is hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 12:14 PM
1

True. Having the meetup time be right now, in the present, is a huge advantage as well. No chance for cold feet or ghosting in between the time of scheduling a date/hangout and the time of the actual date/hangout itself if those two are the exact same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:29 PM
7

Presumably something online/Discord like a gaming or DnD group I would guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:47 PM
10

That's LITERALLY an exact example he used in the post. Do you actually read those, or do you just look at the title and come to shit up the comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:51 PM
1

Yes, although the crux of this is the fact that neither men nor women can seem to acknowledge the others' issues and grievances without instantly retorting with whataboutism. "Yeah, abortion bans vs. bodily autonomy but what about our bodily autonomy with respect to the draft???" "Yeah, men are lonelier than ever in history and killing themselves en masse but what about us women being harassed???" Both of these people are insufferable. There's a time and a place for arguing your own woes, but it…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:50 PM
6

Maybe, but at least some of the most common and stringent filters don't work in real life. Many women (and probably men too, idk) are actually not good at judging height in the slightest. On the apps it's incredibly easy to just set a strict if(height>=6'0") {swipe(right);} else {swipe(left);} filter, but in real life, if you're taller than her by more than a couple of inches, she's literally not going to know if you're 5'9" or 6'1". In-person encounters can at least get your foot in the door wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:39 PM
4

I admire your commitment to correcting this even though it vaguely goes against what you typically post here. Even if the sample size was ten times that, the fact that this voluntary study was openly called "Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization" is inherently going to ruin its credibility because the polling is no longer randomly chosen from the general population. People who were victimized are drastically more likely to go out of their way to take a survey called that than people…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 12:38 PM
2

Gee, I wonder what type of person is most inclined to seek out and take a voluntary "Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization" survey/questionnaire. Could it possibly be skewed in favor of people with said experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 12:29 PM
2

Six percent of rapists commit ninety-one percent of rapes. Bear attacks are rare and geographically limited. How many bears do you pass by on a day to day basis? The premise of the question wasn't "you're in a nondescript forested area that may or may not be natively home to bears, and those particular bears may be more or less aggressive than normal".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:45 PM
1

You're strawmanning here. You literally just did an AMALT. they're the only ones
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:35 PM
1

I don't disagree with that. I just think that unless you're horrendously disfigured, you can't be in 'hideous' territory, and that a lack of attention (even a seemingly complete and total lack) isn't necessarily conclusive evidence that you're down there. I don't want to erase or deny your lived experience, though. Just wanted to offer a little hope for the future, even if it's measly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:40 PM
5

You can't prove the non-existence of something, that's why courts have a presumption of innocence. You made an affirmative claim, now back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:53 PM
5

Wayback machine exists btw... Can you present any reason that the data from 2006 in particular would be vastly anomalous when compared to every other year?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:36 PM
1

Your post history both here and elsewhere is genuinely very sad and I don't mean sad in a snarky way where I'm saying "sad" when I actually mean "pathetic", I mean truly and genuinely sad. I know you've likely heard this a million times over already but you're probably not as ugly as you've been convinced. Several of my friends never had sex or relationships well into their late 20s and 30s, both men and women, and most of them were at least average, if not even a little above average. The probl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:22 PM
16

Every murderer was an innocent child at one point. What's your point? Would you rather be seated on the subway next to a man in a button up with a suitcase or a disheveled crackhead that's randomly shouting every few seconds? Let's talk about risk mitigation here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:02 PM
1

It's a disingenuous question. The OP never claimed that average men should have advantages. We're here to debate in good faith, not "gotcha" people into arguments they never made.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:55 PM
5

Every table is sourced directly from the HHS. You're being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:43 PM
1

Beats me. Seems like they just get on the app store and search "Dating" and download whatever pops up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:14 PM
1

I've genuinely had to tell acquaintances/colleagues that they have to message first on multiple occasions. Like they actually can't comprehend it and get upset that the guys they're matching with aren't messaging them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 06:45 PM
5

Why are 4B wretches even allowed on this sub? You're not here to debate in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:11 PM
1

Does his reasoning matter to the woman that he's currently dating in any way whatsoever? She's not getting his best, regardless of why.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:58 PM
4

Have you ever had casual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:56 PM
1

You're describing someone's league, not their type. Your type is, by definition, what YOU like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:29 PM
5

Your brain takes note of anomalies much more strongly than the things that are observably normal. The average American gets in three or four car accidents in their lifetime, but if you live in a well-populated area you've probably seen dozens of accident scenes this year alone. You might be inclined to think that they're more common than they actually are. When's the last time you personally were in one? Doesn't matter, brain took note of all the ones it's seen recently. You're probably not fact…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:10 PM
2

The supposed Great Bane of "fake it til' you make it" is flawed at best. People like to frame it as "faking forever" when in reality, faking something for long enough and consistently enough can often genuinely turn you into that thing. See: irony poisoning. Where jokingly agreeing with something regularly enough that it turns compulsive and eventually you genuinely adopt that belief or statement. Your brain is very good at noticing and extrapolating patterns. It's not "pretend for the rest of y…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:25 PM
2

Mine does. I don't really know or care about whether men as an abstract concept do, though if reels comments are any indication, it seems that zoomers are certified D1 eaters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 12:26 PM
–

FDS has 83k members
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:42 PM
10

Attention that is never manifested in any observable way is completely and totally meaningless. It may as well not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:27 PM
1

It's not explicitly private as far as the normal sitewide process of privating subs goes, but they did use some kind of automation to go through and ban just about everybody in existence from posting or commenting and directed all new traffic to their website that they have been (surprise surprise) too lazy or unskilled to maintain. For the most part it's a dead/abandoned movement and community.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:08 PM
1

Fundamentally, yes. Do you not? Could a kid born with cerebral palsy become the next Usain Bolt as long as he's devoted and practicing rigorously enough? The outcome of any particular game between two qualified teams is not really up to chance. The outcome of any particular group of humans picked at random is entirely up to chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:59 PM
1

Women are vastly more likely to vent their frustrations both online and in real life, you cannot use "proportion of grievances on reddit dot com" as a reliable metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:55 PM
1

No, dating is not exclusively decided by chance. There's no argument to be made that it's not primarily decided by chance. Even the most fundamental aspect of it, attraction, is almost strictly guided by chance. Your looks are, for the most part, predetermined by chance. What someone you're interested in is attracted to is entirely chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 12:56 PM
1

If I'm extremely lucky I could go out and win the lottery today. I could also play it every single day from now until I die and never win. Is it luck-based?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:13 PM
1

What is even the point of asking a woman that question when you already know the answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:08 PM
–

Had I been flaired as blackpill I'd imagine you would want to tell me that there's no such thing as a blackpill woman or if there were, that she's totally nonsensical. I harbor sentiments from red, blue, and black. It makes no sense to me for someone to subscribe to just one or even for me personally to use the purple one, because I don't believe that it's an even 50:50 spread of "rightness". There was no "dark-tinted maroon" option. Everyone has their points here and there and everyone has thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 05:58 PM
2

There's literally no conceivable way to prove how rare false accusations are. If you want to go down the road of "well only X percent are PROVEN to have been lies", then there's the uncomfortable conversation of whether the fact that the vast majority of accused rapists walk free means that the majority of accusations are false because they, likewise, couldn't be PROVEN beyond a shadow of a doubt. The burden of proof is nigh unfeasible for the majority of both victims of rape and SA and for vict…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:52 PM
1

insinuating that "tiny dick" or "small dick energy" aren't some of the most overused insults of all time oh brother 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:36 PM
4

People who have been cheated on are more likely to cheat, for similar reasons as to why people who were abused as children are more likely to abuse or neglect their own children later in life. It comes from a warped (mostly subconscious) response in the brain that's along the lines of "it happened to me, why shouldn't it happen to them?" In people who have been cheated on multiple times across different relationships, their brains can almost interpret cheating as a 'preemptive strike' to get ahe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:26 PM
5

it's really not that much text....
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:40 PM
2

It's literally just because the athlete is more attractive and visible than him. Like that's just it. It's what we've been telling you all along. Looks are paramount, the fact that he's a douche comes later. [See: Rules 1 and 2]. You're experiencing confirmation bias. "The athlete is a jerk but still gets women, so it must be influenced by the fact that he's a jerk". No. The athlete is attractive enough to be a jerk and still get women despite that, and unattractive guys generally cannot afford …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:30 PM
4

I've been presented with a bowl of skittles. Although, the bowl actually has zero skittles in it. I was given an empty bowl and the person giving it to me said "here, have some skittles". Now I like skittles in general but I prefer the red, green, and yellow ones much more than the orange or purple ones. I'll "raise my standards" by picking out the orange and purple skittles. There are now zero skittles in the bowl. A vast majority of guys do not have the option to voluntarily shrink their pool …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:27 PM
2

It actually makes complete and total sense when you strip it down to nature. Nearly 100% of fertile females of any given sexually reproducing animal species in nature reproduce at least once in their lifetimes. In species with male competition, the weaker (see: undesirable) males do not reproduce. The males fight, the females are the prize, to the victor go the spoils. There are less than a dozen known species in which the females fight for the males, and even amongst those it's usually limited …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:06 PM
6

For how long? Should they be content with being single for life? He's right, a lot of dating/relationship woes in present day come down to the prisoners dilemma. Like, yeah, dating apps wouldn't be so unpleasant if every single man, every one without exception, worldwide, were to stop swiping on literally every woman. But unless every single one unanimously agreed to do that, then any individual man who decides not to on his own has effectively removed himself from the dating pool (on that app).…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:55 PM
1

Biology having an influence on behavior is a well-studied and accepted truth on basically every single characteristic except race/ethnicity because that's a touchy subject. Nobody blames green's actions on their biology because it's taboo to do so, not because it had no factual bearing in their behavior. The arrest rate for violent crimes can be approximated to be 285 per 100.000 for blue men and 245 per 100.000 for green women. My question for you is ultimately, in the end, does it matter to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:06 PM
2

It's literally one to one. If you want to make a claim that because group A does heinous action X more than average, and therefore it's justified for you to be scared or skeptical of group A, then you must also accept the same of group Green, who also does heinous actions more than average. There's no argument to be made that the core logic behind these two assumptions aren't identical. What you're describing is cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 01:45 PM
1

Evidently you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:18 PM
4

You don't need to specifically know it by the "women are wonderful effect" nomenclature or even know that it exists at all to be influenced by it. Many factors that go into it are rooted in biology, and most of them are subconscious. It's not about whether or not someone "denies" it but rather whether it influences their decisions even slightly in any particular scenario (which it probably does).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:12 PM
5

uh... yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:34 PM
6

What do you gain by picking on someone like this who wasn't even talking to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:41 PM
1

"More men would make more of an effort if they weren't in a sexless relationship". Thoughts? Is determining the 'starting point' of the chicken-and-egg scenario all that important? If neither partner is getting what they want out of a relationship then both people have failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 03:32 PM
2

It... would depend on the individual woman and her own personal interests? I would say in general you shouldn't be rude or condescending if the other person is enthusiastic about something you have no interest in, but you can certainly show disinterest while still being polite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:32 PM
1

No. By definition, the person you're describing is not straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:04 PM
–

Most aren't "unaware" per se but choose to blot it out. Women because it's uncomfortable to think about the fact that you could genuinely never be attracted to 90% of guys in the slightest, and men because it annihilates the soul of any poor sap with a good head on his shoulders but not a good face on his head.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 02:57 PM
16

So have women. Virgin and incel are the two of the most used insults of all time, thus reinforcing that a man's value is based on whether or not he can 'acquire' women as a commodity, and how readily. Everyone is obsessed with sex, even the asexuals. It's inescapable in our digital world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:30 PM
4

Yes but also an autogynephiliac who cut a hole in his taint so that means he's literally a woman now (no, not sex change surgery, he literally just cut a hole in his taint with a knife). One of his primary reasons for "transitioning" was in hopes that he could get with lesbians....
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:23 PM
1

I don't see what the point of creating a discussion thread is when you clearly already know the answer to your question but still insisting that the only responses welcomed CANNOT contain the answer. Sex is supposed to be the highest form of emotional intimacy. If you gave it up to one guy on day one and another guy on month three, there's no argument to be made that you're more attracted to the latter guy whatsoever. If he's cool with that and thinks he can still build a stronger connection ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 01:26 PM
4

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:03 PM
1

I don't think the avenues outside of the workplace are all that risky to be honest with you, as long as you're using a smidgen of common sense and self-control. The bar/club is an obvious answer here, but the guys on here and just in general aren't looking for a bar/club girl. It comes with a certain (often accurate) connotation. My best answer personally would be a gym that has a culture other than just being a gym (so no Planet Fitness or Anytime). My local YMCA does group fitness classes week…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:42 PM
1

I would hope not, but I can't speak for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:29 PM
1

Sure, except there's nothing 'more wrong' about it in a moral sense just because it takes place in the workplace, but the possible consequences for each don't reflect that. There are guys on this sub and other online forums that go to the opposite extreme and claim that they or someone they know were accused of r🦍 or sexual harassment to the police for just asking someone out one time, which plainly and simply is not true. But if one of them claimed it lost them their job? Yeah, I could believe …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:24 PM
1

What can you do about it? Date people you're not physically attracted to on the off-chance that the other vectors of attraction grow knowing full well that that specific one won't?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:17 PM
2

It is inherently inferior though. Your overall attraction for a person that you're physically attracted to right out of the gate will grow over time too. The one you're physically attracted to though will already be starting higher up, and in specific ways that the one you're not physically attracted to simply cannot ever catch up in.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:13 PM
2

Probably bad overall. A lot of inter-employee decisions in larger organizations now come down to 'vibes' and 'feelings' instead of rigid, easily interpreted rules. It's great to say "there's absolutely nothing wrong with one polite approach as long as you take no for an answer" and in general that's true. In the workplace though, it's an entirely different situation. Making someone uncomfortable with just one approach is entirely possible. Not uncomfortable enough to be criminal, but enough to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:07 PM
1

What percent of men are self-identified RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:03 PM
1

That's kind of the problem, isn't it? The commonly peddled answer is online dating, but that's abysmal. The truth is simply that fewer people are getting into relationships right now and also taking any risks in general. Drinking, smoking, and mating are all way down with Gen Z. It will balance out eventually as it always has, but things are going to get worse before they get better.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:02 PM
2

Maybe, but I think it might be mislabeling to call that an increase in the perceived physical attractiveness, especially if it's based on great sex. Your brain is associating that person (and, by consequence, their face/body assuming you're in positions facing them) with a pleasant time or feeling in the same way that my cat associates a crinkling bag with food time. I will concede that this may genuinely be an increase in attraction for you specifically and there's nothing wrong with calling it…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:58 PM
2

The HR-ification of the workplace has progressed drastically since you were younger. It's genuinely dangerous for a lot of younger folks to date within their organization. Especially in this economy, you cannot afford to risk losing your job over some claim from a spiteful ex in the workplace or making others uncomfortable with your approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:40 PM
3

This is one of the grand hangups of all of the various relationship subs on this site because the most obvious answer is fundamentally correct but doesn't actually address the issue in any way. When you are in a monogamous relationship, be it a marriage or otherwise, you have either implicitly or explicitly agreed to no longer have sex with anyone else under any circumstances until you are no longer in a relationship with that person. Wedding vows reflect this. So, naturally, that means that you…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:23 PM
4

Perhaps you can't listen to what 'women' as a collective whole say, but you can definitely listen to what individual women might say once you've mentally vetted them thoroughly. No terminally-online social media addict has anything of worth to say for the most part. You're going to find very, very few people on this sub or even this entire website on the whole who don't fit that bill. Like with most topics, the loudest group typically isn't the most correct one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:44 PM
8

That much is obvious but I think the inclusion of "from the start" is to counter a lot of women's claim that attraction can grow as you get to know each other which is technically true, but they're not referring to physical attraction. Unless there's a profound, drastic change in your physical appearance, her physical attraction will be roughly the same during any point in the relationship as it would be the first time she met you. "He grew on me" -> "I like more things about him now"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:33 PM
–

I don't think every misogynist is a terrible person; a large amount of them are misguided and radicalized by content online intentionally devised to strike them where it hurts. Ultimately though, we can't concern ourselves too much about WHY they are the way they are. You're judged by the ways that you treat the people around you, not by whatever factors made you that way. Rightly so. I strongly disagree with your assertion that 99% of sexually unsuccessful men are misogynists. I know far too ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:22 PM
-1

It was more orderly, for better or for worse. Mostly worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:09 PM
17

The physical attractiveness standards for a hookup are drastically higher than for a relationship. There are plenty of fat slobs in relationships but there are very, very few fat slobs having casual hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:07 PM
4

Save this post in case you ever need a reminder that 90% of people on this sub are just brazen liars
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:02 PM
1

I see. It was a little ambiguous and the post is flaired as a debate so I just made an assumption. Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 08:12 PM
1

That's kind of what I was saying, no? The fact that standards, at least as far as looks are concerned, are lowered when scouting for a husband rather than a quickie will at least in some capacity call into question whether looks were something she 'forwent' when she chose you for "husband material". Nobody wants to be "the uggo I have pity sex with once a month to make him shut up". Even in a healthy, committed relationship with a fair balance of labor, you want intimacy to come primarily from y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 07:53 PM
2

Ideally your partner should be both. I do see the argument though that "hookup material but not husband material" is more desirable than "husband material but not hookup material". I see lots of fat slobs in relationships because they have other redeeming qualities that their partner can value and therefore overlook that fact because the positive things they bring to the relationship outweigh that. I don't see anyone jumping to hookup with fat slobs though. One could say that therefore the physi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 03:38 PM
1

I think you can begrudge our inability to understand a lot of your problems just as we can begrudge your inability to understand a lot of our problems. Hate is a strong word. I don't think I hate anyone. You probably shouldn't hate anyone. It's unproductive at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:32 PM
2

I do like it when other morally good people receive recognition for their work, but that doesn't mean that I think they 'deserve' it in some sort of supernatural karmic way. There's nothing wrong with wanting a reward for your good behavior or nature, and in fact in some cases it might be a good thing for people to want a reward who might otherwise not be as driven to be good. The problem lies in thinking that the two things - being good and getting a reward - are intrinsically tied in any way, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:58 PM
1

You can't be serious... anywhere and everywhere in Germany? They arrest people for even so much as making social media posts questioning the economical logistics of importing infinity immigrants, not even denigrating them as a group. One guy got his house raided in 2021 and all his devices seized because he called someone a penis, comically dubbed Pimmelgate, Another was fined a thousand euro for calling someone stupid. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/23/technology/germany-internet-speech-arrest…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:45 PM
1

Other way around. For every five or more of you there is one who will make her uncomfortable. The question is whether or not the actions of a very small subgroup is enough to justify fear or hatred of its parent group across the board and my personal answer has always been no because the reasoning is identical to that of racists, xenophobes, and religious zealots. "sure, not every member of X racial group does Y crime, but there are enough to be guarded around all people who are X by default" ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:29 PM
3

...biology?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:24 PM
2

I try not to either as a late-millennial but just watching my younger friends interact with the world in such a drastically different way than we did when there's less than a decade between us does make me a little jaded about the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:35 PM
3

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:25 PM
8

Do you believe that our standards or preferences could be shaped by people we will never meet in person?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:20 PM
16

The men 50 years ago had to compete with the other men of their hometown. The men of today theoretically can face competition from every other man on the planet who has access to the internet. It's not at all comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 01:41 PM
6

One of these is hailed in the mainstream and one of these is pretty universally reviled by all civil humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 01:32 PM
2

I agree but I was moreso basing that assumption off of her outward obsession with 'ownin da rp'
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 07:26 PM
2

She likely understood what you were really asking and deliberately chose to interpret it otherwise anyway to be snarky and punchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 06:11 PM
1

They are, for the most part. The number of women that men find attractive is vastly larger than the number of men that women find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 05:58 PM
1

The point is that none of that shit matters if you don't already meet her minimum attraction threshold by default. We want kind, gentle, respectful men whom we at minimum already find physically attractive. These are properties that will be useful in keeping a relationship, but they have little to no effect on the difficulty of getting one to begin with. Giving that type of advice to guys you wouldn't ever date in a million years is pointless because it's not meant for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 05:52 PM
3

no true scotsman in the big '26 🥀 no no you don't understand actually FDS was a psyop to make women look bad and literally zero women in real life hold the opinions or values that were expressed there!!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 02:34 PM
0

I think the implication here is that the other four were regular old uncommitted hookups or FWB and the last one is a guy she wound up dating but doesn't anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:56 PM
2

Right, and Nikki Six of Motley Crue wasn't being racist when he said that one thing. It was just the most effective attack to that specific guy, and his use of the N-word, hard-r, doesn't indicate his overarching opinions or hangups in any way. /s You can live in the reality where it's both used because it's the most insulting thing to say to that specific person and because you are hateful towards people who are that thing simultaneously. Virtually nobody in existence calls someone a virgin or …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:32 PM
1

They definitely do, but that's not the topic of this thread. The question was whether widening male gender roles would consequently widen female preferences just as the inverse is true, and the answer is, for the most part, no. I do think that the boys should be focused on getting in touch with who they are and what they value, but that doesn't necessarily mean that women will have any interest in what that ultimately entails.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 01:15 PM
5

Beyond this, a lot of people have a very poor understanding of statistics in general. When they say one in four women has been assaulted or harassed, they genuinely believe that that means that one in four men has assaulted or harassed a woman, when the reality is likely somewhere way further out, like one in fifty or one in a hundred who are typically serial re-offenders. Obviously that's still way too many but the inability to think past 1:1 correlation like that is an issue on a profound scal…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 04:30 PM
1

I don't know how you would even begin to attempt to prove or disprove this. The more people you know or are friends with, the less likely it is to be the case that none of them are. However, if the stats are to be believed about Gen Z which say that 60% of them have three or fewer close friends and one in three men aged 18-24 haven't had sex in the past year, then it's probably pretty unlikely that any random young guy you pick out walking down the street is even acquainted with one, let alone f…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 04:25 PM
2

It may not be this particular study OP is referring to, but I recall one of these studies was based on a metric that was literally just "married before diagnosis -> not married X amount of time after diagnosis" which, in at least a few cases, included the other spouse dying as a case of abandonment. Granted, these circumstances were probably quite rare overall, but their inclusion at all should at least raise some level of skepticism in the researchers' final conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 04:09 PM
2

Body dysmorphia was for the most part considered to be almost exclusive to women up until very recently. As recently as 2021, it was estimated that BDD affected approximately 2.1% of men and 2.4% of women in the US, only their focus was on different aspects of their bodies, such as women being more obsessed with the clarity of their skin and men more obsessed with the locational distribution of fat (physique). The resulting psychological effects were roughly identical at the same ages, and the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 01:36 PM
5

There are zero skittles in a bowl. However, I don't like the taste of green skittles, so I remove them. There are now zero skittles in the bowl.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:46 PM
1

Not to glaze clav here because he is a maniac but that dude literally had it coming. If my stalker tried to block my car to prevent me from leaving you best believe I'm not worried about his safety. That has nothing to do with his "chiseled Chad jawline and expensive cars". I agree with the point you're trying to make but he's a poor example here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:32 PM
2

Most men like most women and most women do not like most men. It really is that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:22 PM
1

Two things. First, as others have pointed out, you're not often going to come across well-adjusted individuals who are currently in healthy long-term relationships here. It's sort of the whole point of the sub. Second, your mind has a habit of accentuating the unusual. By and large, people in long-term relationships are generally with a partner who is roughly in the same league as them, looks-wise. The relationships where this isn't the case are more volatile and in many cases have a power imbal…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 02:48 PM
1

Pair bonding. It's obviously a thing in humans and the ability to pair bond is observably impacted by the number of premarital sexual partners an individual has had, but because the primary study on it was performed on voles and not humans, it's an easy out for anyone who doesn't like the idea that your past romantic/sexual choices impact your future ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:55 PM
20

"skill issue" is meaningless when it comes from the mouth of someone who's been hard-carried since bronze
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:35 PM
1

Unconditionally, yes. It's inscribed in our biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 07:21 PM
2

The woman is the gatekeeper. The man can conform to what the woman wants or he can be abstinent and single. The same is not true in reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 06:44 PM
17

It's an abundance thing. Basically all of my guy friends have expressed that they would actually enjoy being catcalled by strangers occasionally even though they all unanimously agree that catcalling women is bad. I have a hunch that some of them would literally like to be sexually harassed if only for the fact that a woman would be expressing grossly forward and unsolicited interest in them. It's not all that surprising that a woman with unfortunate or downright hideous looks would want a relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 06:33 PM
10

You mean pointless like commenting your personal opinion as a gotcha against a generalized statement? Is that not pointless?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 05:33 PM
–

By definition only 50% of men will make average income or above regardless of what that average is numerically. You can't have 60% of guys making average income, even disregarding those other two things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 04:38 PM
2

The fact that statistically nobody ever really gets convicted for false claims doesn't mean they don't happen. By the same token of "less than X percent of accusations are proven false so therefore they're a statistical anomaly in a sea of valid accusations", one could also say that "less than 5% of accused rapists are convicted so they're a statistical anomaly in a sea of unfounded accusations". They're two sides of the same coin. It's literally impossible to accurately pinpoint the exact perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 03:52 PM
7

Good for you. I guess Henry Cavill is just considered one of the most handsome guys in the world by complete random chance. Everyone's subjective standards all just happened to line up perfectly, and there's nothing objective about attractiveness at all because of this anecdotal example where what I would rate a 7 is actually an 8 for you and vice versa. Mind blowing stuff here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 03:06 PM
2

I guess the response would have to be "in what ways or in what areas?". I don't think anyone who stuck to such a broad, sweeping generalization when asked for more detail could be considered level-headed, genuine, and wanting to engage in an honest discussion, but there are certainly individual aspects or fields that we could talk about specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 02:39 PM
7

water is wet
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 02:24 PM
1

Let's not be intentionally dense here. He was taking issue with the word "deserve", not the notion that you would want to be with someone you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:58 PM
2

If you feel the need to ask us, then there's probably at least some part of you that's insecure about it. But if you're both happy then that's great, no further comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:52 PM
2

I would assume that's because it is an impossible task for most people like that. NPD is likely drastically under-diagnosed. The problem isn't that they're uneducated or unaware of people who try to convince them of their actual SMV/RMV, it's that despite society and people in general showing them their value at all times, they outright ignore these things to a delusional level. It's much easier to tell a guy not to be with a woman who expresses that she feels like she settled for him than it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:42 PM
3

Yeah, for sure. At the end of the day though, does it matter to a man who's with her whether or not her perception of herself is inaccurate? If she perceives him as below herself or herself as having settled, then she's going to treat him like shit whether or not that's factually the case. Guys who accept this dynamic are dorks and pushovers but a lot of guys are just desperate for whatever they can get their hands on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:02 PM
5

it does to them, and that's all that really matters
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:54 PM
7

it highlights what a young child would idealize which is toys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:55 PM
1

I don't think I would describe myself as based but I also wouldn't deny that implication. You routinely see women on here say they're not even remotely attracted to 90-95% of guys in any capacity whatsoever. I believe them. Obviously there's some crossover between one user's 5% and another's, but the fact of the matter is that a lot of guys (and girls I would assume, but probably not nearly as many) are simply not attractive to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:14 PM
–

It's a couple of days late, but for future reference people can typically get past these types of paywalls on *most* sites by temporarily disabling javascript. For users with uBlock, it's the icon of the slash in angle brackets </>
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:55 PM
1

He's not really referring to asexual in the sense that their brain is chemically/biologically rewired to explicitly not want sex, but the mainstream is more understanding and accepting of a term like "asexual" than "volcel".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:18 PM
–

I sent in a modmail about this exchange after having reported it and seeing no action in a few days, the modmail was never responded to and I feel as though I was shadowbanned for a little bit as every single comment I made on that sub got exactly 1 view for like a week or so. As a punishment for reporting people who were blatantly hinting at killing and disposing of your partner, and being upvoted for it. I get that there are a good chunk of misogynists on this sub but it's honestly refreshing …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:26 PM
0

Plenty of celebrities out there are lame and boring and their only merit is that they're considered really good looking. People immediately point to Pete Davidson as a gotcha against this but the fact that their minds immediately go to him is explicitly because he's anomalous in that regard. Ugly is the most damning of these three.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:45 PM
2

I agree fundamentally but not being misogynistic is evidently not the bare minimum and you contradict it yourself in the next sentence. You're right, it's not that they're into the misogyny. But it does mean that that's not the bare minimum. There are countless misogynists in long term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:41 PM
41

For most people, it's easier on the conscience to tell them they're a bad person than it is to tell them they're ugly, I guess. Part of it comes down to feeling like a bad person for telling someone they're ugly to their face when they can't change it and they're not doing anything to deserve it (because you are if you do), and part of it comes down to dodging the uncomfortable conversation that you are, in fact, invested in looks just as much as any joe schmoe guy is. Contrary to what the curre…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:29 PM
3

It's antithetical to JBY. The assertion is that not everyone can be loved as they are currently. This has always been a core tenet of RP ideology from the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 03:29 PM
3

it reads as if you're reciting straight out of the rp handbook: you need to do these things, talk in this manner, look this way, engage in these activities to be able to find love. are you sure you're bp? i'm not seeing any mention of "just be genuine and be yourself bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 03:14 PM
54

Not to play devil's advocate here because I think both of these types of people are just awful, but you see roughly the same equivalent for women, too. For every woman who says "what could a MAN possibly add to my life that I don't already do for myself, unless he does at minimum this, this, this, this, and this, has these features and qualities, has this type of personality, gets along with these people, yadda yadda yadda", there is an equally transactional "I own my own place, I have a good jo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:24 PM
3

Men outnumber women on dating apps because even a thoroughly average woman in terms of attractiveness doesn't need any apps and the same can't be said for men. Most men are attracted to the average woman and most women are not attracted to the average man. This isn't even a red pill take; the women of all different colors on this sub pretty regularly make claims that they're not even remotely attracted to 90-95% of men and yeah, obviously there's nuance in WHO exactly those 5-10% of men are and …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 02:30 PM
33

It's genuinely impossible to get a read on you, windmill. This is one of the funniest comments I've ever seen on this sub, almost explicitly because you're the one posting it. Absolute enigma of a user and the sub would be a lot more boring without you around.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:26 PM
2

if you were a man you would be an incel
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:47 PM
1

Men severely under-report their emotional states. Suicide stats don't continue to drastically favor men for no reason. Everybody is unhappy but there's no reliable evidence that women are 'more unhappy' than men which isn't derived from self-identified survey-type studies. It's not that these studies are useless but it's important to remind yourself that, even anonymously, fewer genuinely depressed men will report being depressed than genuinely depressed women and fewer still will ever seek help…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:15 PM
13

just make your own media megaconglomerate to compete with the zeitgeist of the existing ones bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:55 PM
1

And I think that's fair, as I've conceded with boafus1417 above. I don't blame people for choosing to not play the numbers game and I wouldn't try to convince someone who's made up their mind on the matter to try anyway. I only offer my perspective for someone who appears to be on the fence about the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 01:33 PM
0

I'm sorry to hear that, that was definitely uncalled for. I would never demean someone for having or seeing such an experience firsthand and choosing not to go that route anymore. As for your sisters, that's disheartening to hear, but people who act miserably on this topic tend to glom onto each other and fuel each others' spite, so if one of them felt glee in sharing that, it's not all too surprising that the other(s) would too just because of proximity, even if they wouldn't naturally feel or …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 10:28 PM
3

Hey, glad to! While I was finishing my degree, I was working a dead-end job at a liquor store as a stocker/cashier. He would come in every few weeks for a bottle of something or other. The interactions were never really flirty but were chatty. Then he started asking for things he already knew we didn't have and then being like "shuck, darn, do you know what's similar or good? what do you like? etc." and then it progressed to him coming every week or so, but buying smaller and smaller bottles eac…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 07:41 PM
7

To be honest, I think it's the exact opposite nowadays. Dating apps are obviously a cesspool and basically always have been but from what I understand it's drastically worse for guys now, even more than it was the last time I was on them like a decade ago. Most of my single friends wish they were hit on more in public and inb4 "buh you womyn asked for this and guys are just listening to what YOU said!!": No, these particular women and most women in general did not. The "DO NOT APPROACH WOMEN EVE…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 02:52 PM
5

intellectually dishonest to say this knowing full well their account is set to private
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 06:14 PM
1

Your DNA is 70% identical to a slug's. Numerical and cellular comparisons on things like this are meaningless and genuinely believing this is a gotcha requires low IQ. ETA: This user's most recent post is just "Men make no sense as a concept". Genuinely sub-80.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 01:42 PM
16

not bait, just your average windmill post
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 01:23 PM
0

Not really. Ottawa was just nasty like that. Are you sure you're blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 01:08 PM
1

"All of the women here" is a meaningless premise. We're not representative of the general population and this sub specifically has a strong selection bias since the people who are in successful relationships and who don't have a deep-seated hatred of the opposite sex rarely have the slightest idea of what pill culture is let alone find their way onto this sub and post as much as someone like you does. A woman who frequents this sub has had drastically worse interactions with men on average than …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 02:35 PM
–

even if only one in one thousand matches genuinely have the potential to be a great partner who suits you and you're attracted to would you rather have one thousand matches that you have to sift through or three
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 02:23 PM
1

No, and take the responses ITT into account before ever taking anything anyone on this sub says seriously. I promise you the 90% of yes's are not at all indicative of how real life women in the real world who aren't terminally online feel on the topic. The women on this sub might be even less representative of women in real life than the men on this sub are to men in real life, and that's saying something.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:15 PM
3

Second this. Grew up in a town with a population of less than 10,000 and most of the girls I knew only slept with guys they were actively dating, and even the ones who had dated several guys in a short time span generally still waited until they considered themselves as "dating". Then later on in my life I lived in Ottawa for a short while and it seemed like everybody was fucking anything that moved.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 03:41 PM
2

The guys bashing them and the guys paying them are generally two distinct groups. What little overlap there is, I would assume are guys who are so hideous or gross that they are resentful towards women because of their lack of success but at the same time the only way they can ever get that sense of validation is by paying for it. Similar to those studies a while back about hostility towards women in online competitive games which found that the most vitriolic guys on those games are the ones wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 03:01 PM
–

Logically, there must be one person out there who is more suited for you than anyone else on the planet, but: You will never meet them. You are not their 'the one'. There are plenty of people out there who are close enough that you could make them 'Your One' and live a perfectly fulfilling life with them until you both die but nobody will ever have 'THE One'. Even downright self-proclaimed incels agree that oneitis is the perfect way to destroy your psyche and ensure that you don't ever find You…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:37 PM
2

I like when they start beaming/gushing if you give them a compliment that's about them physically and not just "cool shirt" or "good work on xyz". I told a guy he had beautiful hair one time and he remembered that a year later. They're really easy to cheer up. I understand the reason behind that is upsetting (they genuinely never hear such things for great lengths of time) and at the same time I know that many women, myself included, are sometimes met with guys who misinterpret that positivity a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 02:38 PM
2

Indeed. Mistook this for a discussion post instead of a debate one because it doesn't seem to be something anyone really disagrees with. Whoopsie. Mods can delete my response if they care.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 02:29 PM
1

It all circles back to "chase a woman who won't make you chase". A woman who likes you will make the chase easy for you. That doesn't mean "don't ever try because you won't need to work for the right one". All that means is don't waste a ton of effort on a girl who's making chasing her difficult, because if she actually liked you that wouldn't be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 01:24 PM
2

I have never once in my life heard or seen anyone refer to an overweight man as plus size.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:58 PM
2

It happens. Nothing to apologize for. Maybe, but this particular comment thread started with talking about single motherhood and the supposed women's intuition when it comes to partner choice so it seemed relevant to point out that scumbags like that have no trouble finding partners regularly, despite all of their obvious red flags. Being poor and uneducated could definitely make those red flags a little less red but if you see an un/under-employed tweaker/stoner/alcoholic with a multitude of fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:29 PM
5

And? Does that mean none of their poor decisions are of their own making? my flair is right there btw
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:15 PM
12

Nobody can ever be absolutely certain about anything. Never, ever fucking guys who live in trailers but own brand new cars would be a good start. Every one of them I've ever known has had multiple baby mamas and they never seem to have any trouble finding new ones. You would think any self-respecting woman would be able to tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:24 PM
1

For what it's worth, it's not because they disagree with you or don't want you to tell them what they want to hear, it's because it goes against the grain. Any guy who takes your personal opinion (which, in and of itself, was kind and virtuous) as representative of how 'women in any meaningful capacity' feel on the subject, with any seriousness, is doing themselves a disservice. I would go as far as to say that I agree with you personally, but we are very much the minority in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:22 PM
1

I guess, but the assertion in the post is that women en masse claim to put more effort into dating when that's not really the case. It's always been obvious who puts more effort into dating, especially in the early stages, and the people who claim the contrary are a loud minority. I think the difference between not acknowledging something and outright denying it is nontrivial, personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:12 PM
0

I've never seen or met anyone that genuinely thinks like that who wasn't also chronically online. I'm not saying there aren't women like that but I think in real life they are few and far between. The overwhelming majority of women don't think in the "who does more" frame of mind at all in the beginning, so even though the answer (at least toward the start of a relationship) is obviously the man, most simply don't even acknowledge that notion let alone challenge it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:56 PM
1

When virgin and incel are the two most common insults thrown at men it becomes hard to not see that they're obviously hinging his value on the amount (or lack thereof) of sex he's having, and ironically objectifying women and poon as this sort of social currency where if a guy hasn't had or don't presently have any, he's less-than. Sure, you'll never see them outright say "we love male sluts", but the implication has always and will always be there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:57 PM
1

Okay? Like yes, this all tracks but even knowing that, then what? Do you think this will convince even one single mid guy who's desperate for sex or 'love' from continuing to do the only thing he is capable of doing to hold a woman's attention beyond a glance? Fake or not, he's going to chase those crumbs until it kills him and nothing you say or do will make him stop. It's a prisoner's dilemma on a national or even global scale. Unless every single simp on the planet all agreed to stop, it won'…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:25 PM
1

how do you figure
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:13 PM
1

Not a man but it's my understanding that most men who are afraid of this have always been afraid of it all along, not just when their looks begin to fade and their prospects dwindle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 04:19 PM
–

This is a super lazy and poorly worded post but I'm pretty sure the fundamental point that you're getting at here isn't "be lazy" but rather "if you have to work to chase her, then she's not that into you and you're wasting your time". Water's wet. Guys shouldn't do the "bear minimum" but rather should go above and beyond only for a woman who is already interested in them and not waste effort trying to "win her over".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:44 PM
–

The court of public opinion is arguably just as powerful as the real actual legal courts in different ways. Even if convicted of aggravated rape, offenders are rarely, if ever, given a life sentence. The average term is somewhere around 10-15 years. In the emerging age of the internet, though, the societal punishments will almost certainly follow that person for their entire life. That's a life sentence in its own way, and the problem is compounded by the fact that the former requires proof beyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:24 PM
1

Not bluepill but something being 'true enough' to generalize doesn't mean it's always true or even true most of the time. Let's use some made up numbers here. Let's say 5% of people in general are promiscuous, and that maybe 15% of people like you're describing are promiscuous. There are then two opposite conclusions that are simultaneously at play. That particular type of person is three times as likely to be promiscuous as a 'regular' person on the one hand. The overwhelming majority (85%) of …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 03:17 PM
5

nope, just your average everyday windmill post
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:37 PM
-1

It doesn't matter if it was "FIFTY" years ago or "THREE HUNDRED" if the number of jobs hasn't properly adjusted to meet it. It's intellectually lazy to just totally ignore the most fundamental rules of supply and demand because "muh immigrants" or "muh indians". Is it not a factor at all? Doubling the supply doesn't drive down the demand in any meaningful way? It's not just intellectually lazy, it's dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:34 PM
1

do you think it's possible that there are no jobs because the workforce has doubled in size
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:23 PM
–

I think the distinction between "I believe this because it works for me" and "I believe this because it works for my ideal version of you" is nontrivial and worth differentiating. While I do agree fundamentally with the point he's trying to make, I'm arguing that the latter is a much bigger factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 06:14 PM
5

A lot of guys genuinely have zero standards beyond "don't be obese" though...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:29 PM
8

These things only apply once a guy meets their personal looks threshold. The fact that looks are just like an 'eh' in studies like these is because to even find a guy attractive to begin with, he already needs to be past that mark. So when surveyed, and they say "I don't value looks as high as XYZ", what that really means is "I don't value excess looks that are over the bare minimum threshold to even be considered at all as high as XYZ", which is entirely different. The looks beyond that line ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:04 PM
1

Not personally, but I do see a lot of the reverse of this on subs like r/relationship_advice that tend to sway quite a bit more in favor of women in most contexts compared to a sub like this one. It's like a weekly occurrence where you see one post by "a woman" with genuinely helpful or supportive comments and then a few days later, a nearly identical post but with the sexes flipped and it either gets little to no engagement or is met with blame and skepticism. I have no doubts that the same is …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:53 PM
–

I think it's less about ignorance or lack of understanding and more because when a lot of women do this (and, for the record, I try to avoid giving guys dating advice in real life altogether), whether they mean to or not, aren't giving advice that's pertinent to the specific type of guy that they're giving it to. All three of the things that you've listed here that they might say don't really apply to you or any other average joe schmoe, but they do apply to a guy who is already generally attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:57 PM
–

Oxford study et cetera et cetera blah blah blah words text I'm a little confused by what exactly you're asking for here? It is incredibly stupid but I don't think it really points to anything significant at the societal or 'dating world' level. "Immediately getting with the first tinder dork you find" being a piss poor idea isn't earth-shattering.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:30 PM
2

The world is not kind but you as an individual can choose to be. These things are not contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:25 PM
4

Maybe a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:53 PM
7

I have to imagine that those feelings are greatly mitigated after that point though, no? Unless you paid for it, it's no longer "nobody in the world wants me in that way", at worst it's "very few people in the world want me in that way". Which I get isn't hugely better, but it should at least be a little better, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:48 PM
1

The selfishness of existing in public? You didn't say "men should take better care of themselves if they want to hit on me", you said you were disgusted when 'mid' guys enter a function at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:06 PM
1

Guys don't have female friends because all women are trying to have sex with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:03 PM
4

Guys that aren't showering aren't mid. Ashamed is attacking guys who are just generally not pleasing to the eyes as if they have any control over 90% of their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:40 PM
1

A full month isn't all that long of a time for something like this (inb4 ur a womyn u wudnt get it lol). Check out deadbedroom sub for three seconds to find people in marriages who have gone vastly longer without getting it on. I guess it's good for guys who are addicted to gooning but those guys typically get hyped up for it, last one week or less, and then go back to the status quo. In general, it's my understanding that most of the people who make a big deal of it don't actually commit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:42 PM
2

Something to keep in mind is that amongst alcoholics, there are significantly more functioning, hides-it-convincingly alcoholics who are male than who are female. It's possible that you're not seeing trends as strongly because they are simply better at hiding it from you. Considering AA is where you'll find the people that actually give a shit about their lives and aren't hopeless, you're naturally going to see people who are more sociable and less hideous because they are going to be the ones w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:15 PM
1

I wouldn't say "above average" necessarily, but it's rarely the most hideous gremlin freaks, and even more rarely social outcasts/observably neurodivergent guys. I guess this means by definition they are above average since the bottom of the barrel is *mostly* removed, but the guys at the top don't need dating apps and the guys at the lower half basically only use the apps and don't go out to social settings as often to begin with. It's either guys with confidence (faux or otherwise) or guys wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:39 PM
1

Even if you concede that income does not explicitly attract women (which is fair), the confidence that comes from being financially secure/affluent does. Contrary to popular opinion, for the most part confidence is something that money CAN buy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:51 PM
1

Typically you work plans around your predetermined responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:36 PM
14

This is largely the case on many metrics when it comes to things that men and women are "equivalent on average" in. There are more men who are unusually intelligent and who are unusually dumb. There are more men who are unusually wealthy and who are unusually poor. There are more prolific male authors and there are more men who are illiterate. Maybe some of this can be explained away by muh patriarchy or whatever, but you're right that there's definitely a biological inclination towards extremes…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:56 PM
–

My thought is that when someone says post they're most typically referring to the OP even if it's as a reply to someone else's comment, and if they were responding to a comment they would either address "you" directly or say comment, but I guess that's not always the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:11 PM
–

I think they were agreeing with you homie
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 01:14 PM
2

I don't think that you should need to be equally receptive to everyone but you also said that you were disgusted when anyone approaches you for any reason which I think is also too far in the other direction. It's your life though, and I won't tell you how to live it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:46 PM
3

Your asinine hypothetical was a question of what he would do if he was a woman. He answered under the pretense that he was a woman (which he's not and couldn't be, that's the whole point of YOUR hypothetical that you presented to him).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:44 PM
–

This is a genuine contender for dumbest post of the month.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:39 PM
4

"Nobody is entitled to a warm reception" is kind of a recipe for the widespread degradation of polite society, no? If everybody has this "fuck you, don't talk to me" attitude all the time right off the bat, then the only people who are ever going to talk to you are the guys who don't care what you think of them and don't care that you don't want them talking to you (aka gross slobs).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:22 PM
2

A lot of women see the "one in four women has been sexually assaulted in her lifetime" thing and their brain parses that as "one in four men is a rapist" as if it's 1:1, when in reality it's like one in a hundred or more men who are serial reoffenders. Not to mention that this line of statistical reasoning is what leads many to racism and xenophobia, but there's some degree of cognitive dissonance there for a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:45 PM
–

I never said it was. What I said was that people who agree with the point made in the post tend to think that way (not you.), and that trying to convince people who are like that to 'choose not to be with an ugly man out of respect for him' is largely pointless since they never respected him from the get-go.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 02:23 PM
–

My statement is based on the things I saw with my own eyes to be demonstrably true amongst my peers as I was growing up. The majority of girls who thought being pretty and having a handsome boyfriend were the #1 priorities of life treated unattractive people (not just guys) like subhumans.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 01:16 PM
16

If a girl really likes you it literally does not matter how luxurious a first date is; if a coffee or froyo date turns her off then she wasn't really all that into you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:22 PM
–

The people who talk like this don't have any respect for unattractive men to begin with. Respect is conditional based on things that are largely out of his control.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:16 PM
3

It has little to no effect. The guys who are perpetually lonely aren't getting those cues/invitations to begin with. Whether or not a 'lonely man' (in the context of specifically the ones who openly identify with the male loneliness epidemic) approaches is irrelevant to his success. If anything, it might get him in trouble. The unattractive/ND guys aren't typically given the go-ahead to approach and the attractive/NT guys aren't typically lonely for very long. Broadly speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 01:37 PM
2

I can't help but feel that your flair is detrimental to whatever point you're trying to make here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 07:29 PM
3

But discrimination on the basis of sex is not. Men need not apply. The app's premise is illegal.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:37 PM
6

this has literally nothing to do with the topic of this post. kindly deactivate your account.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:50 AM
26

🌸 violence is when you're told No 🌸 - UpbeatDeal7479
/r/MensRights24/11/24 02:23 PM
6

2 year probation probably
/r/MensRights13/11/24 11:12 PM
4

I think saying you're going to straight up purchase a gun and use it to kill people (aka actionable threat) is a little beyond your average everyday tiktok stupidity.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:57 AM
5

There are absolutely zero changes the president can make federally regarding abortion at this point, as the supreme court has decided it's a state's issue that the federal government has no say in. Not Donald. Not Kamala. Not Jeb.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:49 PM
-1

True
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:19 PM
-4

Did I say you should be happy for it or did I say that it makes sense from a business standpoint? Perhaps stores should stock more things that sit on shelves for months and don't get bought? Would it make sense for Walmart to put out Halloween candy in February?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:43 AM
0

With all due respect I don't think this is explicitly a men's issue. Even with modern times ushering in more and more men who are interested in fashion beyond business casual, women still purchase nearly double the amount of clothes as men do. There are many reasons for it like that women's clothes are often less durable/made poorly so they need to be purchased more frequently (but are, on average, cheaper than their male counterparts..), women are more trend-oriented and therefore some may buy …
/r/MensRights28/10/24 10:19 PM
2

Men do more grueling and demeaning jobs, women most affected
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/24 02:58 AM
3

Crazy that they have the deductive reasoning skills to be scared of men because like 1 in 200 men have ever assaulted someone, but somehow not be able to bridge those same synapses for the 15 million illegals entering in the past 4 years
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/24 02:50 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights23/10/24 12:40 AM
2

No breakdown by major, interestingly enough. I don't know a lot of conservatives going to school for polsci or gender studies or philosophy or whatnot.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 12:38 AM
1

what an oddly specific number
/r/MensRights23/10/24 12:24 AM
3

Without knowing more about the nature of their relationship, or a woman’s reasons for having an affair, it is difficult to assert with confidence that the unfaithful woman has wronged the deceived man. Holy shit I am already radicalized one sentence into the "SHOULD CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATION BE SUCCESSFUL?" section.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:42 AM
1

With all due respect to men's issues, I want to say no, not quite. Twitter is a breeding ground for toxicity and I genuinely believe that if you went to random people in whatever town you live in, people who are this vitriolic and spiteful toward men would be drastically outnumbered by normal people, maybe 1:50, 1:100, idk. This is obviously still too high though, everyone should give everyone a chance and not live with so much hate in their hearts, but alas. I just don't think this particular t…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:37 AM
1

imagine my surprise to find that the writer is.. you know
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:51 AM
1

That's crazy. I remember this one time that I got every single question right on my exam, and so did the guy next to me, but for whatever reason I only got a 77 when he got a 100! No justice! /s
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:04 PM
1

"Asian people are shorter on average." -"Well I know a tall Asian guy!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 01:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter