TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PixelNinja112 Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by PixelNinja112 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Fuck off. Does pointing out a statistic and saying that we shouldn't make this a men vs. women issue qualify as whiteknighting now? Maybe I want to see both sides' point of view. Maybe I'd rather research and see the nuance in an issue. But clearly, you don't, and you'd rather hide behind accusations of whiteknighting than hear an opinion that doesn't perfectly fit into your little narrative. But frankly, unless you have a more constructive comment to offer (like other ways to interpret the stat…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:55 AM
0

Of course, but the cartels in Mexico are pretty large. But like I said, devil's advocate.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 09:29 PM
-6

Kind of playing devil's advocate since I think we should be focusing on the 80% of men killed, but the belief seems to be that women are being targeted by the violence. Think being murdered by a rival gang vs. being picked up off the street and being murdered. But again, I really think the whole cartel situation needs to be fixed, because that's where most of the murders are coming from. Edit: Do you people not understand devil's advocate?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 07:31 PM
-13

Doesn't fit the narrative? The whole situation in Mexico is really shitty, I don't we should act like it's a men's rights vs, feminists issue.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 05:47 PM
-19

To be fair, those 20% of murders are on average more brutal than the other 80%, But really the whole situation in Mexico is shitty, we shouldn't turn into a feminism vs. men's rights issue. Killings of women are shown to be much more brutal than those of men in Mexico. It is 1.3 times as likely for women to be murdered using sharp objects than men. Also, women are 3 times as likely to be murdered by means of hanging, being strangled, being suffocated, and drowning. Finally, women are 2 times as …
/r/MensRights21/12/19 05:16 PM
1

Agreed on the last paragraph. From the first pic, a man would've probably been sent to jail or put on a list. To be clear, I'm not excusing what she did, because she's still a teacher. She should've known better than to send more, but I just think it's unfair to put 100% of the blame on her when the student shouldn't have asked for more.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:28 PM
1

Yes, if the genders were reversed I would still say the same thing. Her side of the story is explained in the article, which I'm going to be you didn't read. She told the court she liked to keep in touch with her former students, to see how they were doing. That's why she had their contact information.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:51 PM
1

Not because he's a male, because according to the teacher's side of the story he asked for more nudes. And yes, if it the genders were reversed, I would still say the same. Stop jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:49 AM
0

Because the student asked for more. She should've known better than to fill his request, but the student isn't exactly innocent in this. Of course she could be lying, but we shouldn't completely throw out her side just because this is a mens' rights sub.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 01:58 AM
0

Accidentally sending a nude isn't rape, and especially not when the student is asking for more. It's still inappropriate behavior, the teacher shouldn't have sent more when the student asked, but it's not like the student is altogether innocent. And if the genders were switched, I'd still say the same thing. Neither one is ok, but it's not entirely one person's fault.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 01:56 AM
0

Did you read the article? She said she accidentally sent the student a risqué photo of herself she had meant to send her husband, but then the student asked for more photos and she “was afraid not to appease him.” I don't think it excuses her behavior, but she didn't intentionally "go after" a student. Edit: All of you should do yourselves a favor and go read the full article before you comment. It's clear most of you didn't.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 09:27 PM
1

Could it be that she was spending more money than what she wanted to earn herself, so her husband had to do it for her? If you want your husband home more, try spending less of his money and earning more of it yourself. Let's not jump to conclusions here. Her husband could just have a job that doesn't pay well, or a job that forces him to work long hours. Plus, it does say she she was a former teacher, so it's not like she never worked.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 09:23 PM
1

So whiteknighting?
/r/MensRights22/11/19 02:28 PM
1

Serious question, what's bad about MensLib? Besides them being a lot more passive than r/mensrights, I don't get why this sub dislikes them.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 05:41 AM
11

"Men can't determine what is or isn't a women's issue." "Feminists should decide what is considered men's issues."
/r/MensRights12/11/19 11:02 PM
9

A women's' shelter will be better and a less intimidating fit for the community This seriously reminds me of the "black people/minorities are dangerous criminals" mentality.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 02:10 PM
-2

But that's not a "pussy pass denial." If a woman said she should get a lower prison sentence because of her gender, but received a full sentence, that would be her her trying to use a pussy pass and having it denied. If anything getting a lower sentence because of her gender is the opposite of a pussy pass denial.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/19 02:21 AM
17

I don't see why this is pussy pass denial. Unless she used her gender to try and get out if it there was no pussy pass to deny.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 11:58 PM
33

It would be better than someone actually forgetting to add male as a gender.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 02:58 AM
3

If this isn't I'm really going to lose all hope for the future.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:49 PM
1

If anything it's an insult to women. "We don't think you're as smart as the men so we'll lower the standards for you."
/r/MensRights30/08/19 08:56 PM
4

If I remember correctly, the movie Roma made lots of Mexicans angry because they didn't like that a Mexican was being portrayed by an "ugly native woman."
/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:25 PM
6

Yeah, if someone is saying "feminism is for men too," then obviously the rule contradicts that, but I doubt many people actually believe that feminism is also for men. Maybe some deluded feminists do but I think most people recognize feminism only focuses on women.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 07:38 PM
1

I don't know what you're getting so hung up about. It's a sub for feminists, it makes perfect sense that they'd want to focus on women's issues. We have exact same type of rule here, and I don't think you'd want this sub flooded with women's rights issues.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 07:19 PM
15

My guess would be that she says because men can't give birth, or possibly because she thinks "women are biologically smarter or have bigger brains" or some shit like that. I've heard the last claim from my English teacher so there are some of them who think that way.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 02:52 AM
15

They might have a bad understanding of male anatomy. There was a buzzfeed video where one of the feminists compared balls to boobs by saying "I don't need to stand with arms apart to make room for my boobs."
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:21 AM
17

I think you missed the point. It's not literally saying that men shouldn't go outside, it's criticizing people who blame rape victims for "putting themselves in those situations." It's supposed to be ridiculous because it's pointing out the flaws in the logic of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:59 AM
5

You have some conservative christians who do blame women "for dressing like sluts," but those are fringe groups. Most people don't blame rape on the clothes the victim was wearing.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:38 AM
7

The article's title is so misleading. She was called out for saying that men are trash, not for her tweets about sexual harassment.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/19 04:32 PM
2

I can understand teaching gender fluidity, but at six? All they're doing is confusing the children, and probably even harming their gender identity, like it seems to have done with the girl.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:39 AM
9

Pitchford is the woman, she's the one that isn't allowed to return to the home. It doesn't say anything about kicking the victim out of his home.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 07:01 PM
2

Ok, but if your being insulted your putting yourself on the same level as the same people who hate white men and insult anyone who disagrees with them. The guy could've done better research but we shouldn't stoop to insulting.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:12 AM
0

I agree, but you don't need to be insulting about it. It's an honest mistake, unfortunately prostate cancer is talked about so little that it makes sense he would assume it has similar rates to ovarian cancer.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 12:09 AM
31

There's also things men do to other men, like shaming them for enjoying something that's not masculine. I used to doodle flowers and plants because the designs are cool and I was good at drawing them, and a friend called me gay and made fun of me for it. It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter