TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pixiepup Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by Pixiepup on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

I love how there was a bunch of clarification about managing one's own emotions and a couple mentions about being empathetic towards people who don't look or act like them and the response is "yeah, but men shouldn't have to be the only ones who are empathetic." This is a perfect illustration of OPs point about low EQ being so common.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 03:59 PM
2

which is the opposite of asking and is closer to physically forcing someone to do something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 05:39 PM
5

Foreplay is what most women will say makes sex good, specifically. Dismissing that means completely disregarding how men can provide the type of sex that most women enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:40 PM
12

Nah..this discussion is about sex. That's what women are talking about when they say men are bad . This misunderstanding is the fundamental reason women complain about men being bad/selfish at sex. For the vast majority of women, penetration is the least pleasurable part physically, and if their mind isn't fully engaged by the time penetration happens, there's no way to make the sex good. Dismissing everything outside of penetration as besides the point means that the person doing so will never …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 01:44 PM
2

Hmmm, i'd say the fact that most vegans I know do it for ethical reasons rather than nutritional, and as you say, it takes massive effort to avoid nutritional imbalances vs. an omnivorous diet, the most logical conclusion is that chances are most vegans aren't more healthy than those with more traditional diets, quite the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:39 AM
1

I've extensively studied nutrition, and while esting lots of veggies is certainly healthy I don't know of any data to support your assertion that they are usually more healthy than the general population. Got any sources?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 09:06 PM
8

My ex girlfriend straight up told me she had rape fantasies, of like me just coming into the house and without saying a word having my way with her. That supports the person you were responding to in their stance that when most people say "rape fantasy" what they mean is ravishment. A ravisher "forces" someone into the sexual acts they secretly longed to participate in whereas rape by definition is actually unwanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 09:01 PM
1

If you're putting your genitals in or around someone else's, you've met them whether or not there was a formal introduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/16 12:38 AM
18

Nobody is upset with anyone for being attracted. It's when you express that attraction in ways that violate someone's comfort level and boundaries that it becomes creepy. Being extremely anxious comes across as creepy as well because human brains are wired with mirror neurons, and our brains will gladly pick up on feeling and just backfill the reason after. "He's twitchy and anxious, so now I'm nervous. Everything around me appears safe, therefore he must be nervous because he's thinking aboht s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 08:35 AM
2

I adore bi men, but I'm not sure any gay men would be interested, seeing as how I have a vagina and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/16 03:03 AM
5

I've had a few with my husband, at my suggestion. Great experience all around if everyone was being honest afterwards, which I don't see why they wouldn't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 02:46 PM
2

Ironically the top mod is more creepy than any of the content tho. Who better to recognize and call out creepers than the king creeper?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 01:19 AM
1

What is your evidence they're not doing this same bragging about you to others when you're not around?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 05:47 PM
2

By them, or by you? What differentiates your friendship from those of the orbiters?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 05:35 PM
2

I'd be far more upset and embarrassed if someone stood up in the middle of a meal to announce sex is no longer on the table, tossed down the cash for their own appetizer and drink onto the table and walked out. How is finishing a date "monopolizing" anyone's time? He's already lost the opportunity of enjoying the meal with someone else, I highly doubt he's going to have another prospect lined up and hoping to jump in on dessert and the main course. Is having a pleasant conversation and then find…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 03:18 PM
2

Cool story. How many would that be, exactly? On a more serious note, how is someone acknowledging that they can't have sex without it changing the way they feel a weakness? I no longer have one night stands because I've spent 9 years in a (polyamorous) relationship with the last person I attempted to have one with. I cannot separate sex from deeper feelings of intimacy, so of course it changes the nature of a relationship when I engage in it with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 03:12 PM
1

Confirmation bias xoxo Oh, the irony!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 03:07 PM
1

obviously they wouldnt stick around if you didnt have something else to offer. Oh yes, friendships tend to be reciprocal, or they fall apart. Good observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 03:06 PM
2

Sshhh, you're ruining his fantasies!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 02:37 PM
2

If they are fun to be around and invite people to (presumably also fun) parties, then how is that them being a dick or not reciprocating? I've had friends I've been financially better off than that I didn't think twice about treating because I enjoyed the pleasure of their company enough to make the price of whatever we were doing worth the opportunity to hang out. I've also been in a position where friends treated me to some activity I couldn't afford myself at the time, with the only expectati…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 02:31 PM
1

It depends. I've known sometimes whether I would or wouldn't sleep with someone pretty much within the first minute of interaction, but a possibly yes l, if we develop the chemistry can always be quickly turned into a no, absolutely not. Getting from "I doubt it would ever happen" back to possibly yes is a lot of work that will probably not be worth it for either side, and coming back from absolutely not has never happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 02:24 PM
2

I prefer splitting, letting a date pay for everything makes me feel like a hooker who doesn't undertand the business side of their profession.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 02:20 PM
1

Thanks for your attempted help, but I would keep focusing on the source of my own lack of self esteem and examine the possibility that my own beliefs about how the world works may be hindering my personal success if I were you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 11:20 PM
1

Sure babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 11:13 PM
2

Ok, believe whatever you like dear, good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 11:10 PM
1

"Any guy" as you say, would be wrong. But keep at your near 100% fail rate if you prefer, it's no skin off my nose.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 10:56 PM
0

See, I spent a decent amiunt of effort on my profile, so if someone can't be bothered to read the about me section and figure out a question to ask, why would I bother messaging back? I've gone on at least one date with everyone who was in my area actually seemed to be interested in me as a person to begin with in their opening message, vs me as an amalgamation of holes and tits for their entertainment pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 09:50 PM
1

even to my parents for the weekend by myself To be fair, with breast feeding, I'm not sure this would be the best idea. with a new baby. Everything else is on point though.
/r/askMRP30/06/16 08:11 AM
1

Let's look at the exclusionary rule, and what it means, more in depth: The exclusionary rule was established at the federal level in 1914 by the United States Supreme Court in the case Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383. Until that time, the common law provided that any relevant evidence, no matter how it was obtained, could be entered into criminal proceedings as proof. Simply put, this rule disallowed the use of any evidence that was obtained by illegal means. A further case, Mapp v. Ohio 36…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 03:05 AM
1

How about this, give me one example of a case where illegally acquired evidence is admitted in court, and then you'll be clearly right and I will admit defeat. I'm not going to cite sources all day to prove a negative to you when a quick Google of "telephone recording consent laws" will prove everything in my previous posts quite satisfactorily. Again I ask, Please help me understand how we would stop private investigators (civilians mind) from collecting evidence illegally that can then be used…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:22 AM
1

Telephone recording laws are laws that govern the civilian recording of telephone conversations by the participants. Recording by government or law enforcement (wiretapping) are usually covered by distinct laws. Looks like I'm not the one talking out my ass. Please help me understand how we would stop private investigators (civilians mind) from collecting evidence illegally that can then be used police/prosecutors if only those officially employed by law enforcement were required to use legally …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:06 AM
1

Evidence collected illegally is inadmissible, yay laws! You might be able to convince a judge to give you a warrant if the burgler was a credible enough witness in your example, but there is certainly no guarantee. And yes, I specified because I understand not all states are two party. In one party states, it's legally collected evidence if it shows a crime, hence admissable in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:16 PM
1

It's not a bad law, as above the reasoning for the state creating the law is explained. It may be enforced unfairly, but that in itself doesn't make it a bad law. It a reasonable law for a smoother running of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 08:32 PM
1

Victim says: I never gave him permission to put his dick in me, but he did. (Rape accusation.) Perpetrator says: of course I put my dick in her, I knew she wanted it. Investigator: did you ask her if she wanted it? Perpetrator: she didn't have to I could just tell by the way she looked at me (or whatever bullshit.) I don't need a lawyer, this is feminist bullshit, you can tell she loves all kind of dick, especially mine Investigator: she says she didn't want it, you confirmed that you never actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 08:29 PM
1

No, I'm giving a hypothetical where someone is stupid enough to corroborate the victim's story without realizing they're admitting guilt. You don't have to give evidence against yourself, but no one in the justice system will stop you if you want to or are dumb enough to accidentally do so. In fact, investigators rely on it quite often to solve crimes of all sorts. So again, what of the hypothetical above?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 08:24 PM
1

You're totally avoiding the above hypothetical, and that's ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 04:26 PM
3

Would you rather take that slight risk and have to possibly recover for a few minutes or risk being on the sex offender registry for the rest of your life? Almost like being certain you aren't a rapist is a better choice in rational people's minds or something. Not that odd to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 04:23 PM
2

In he said she said I don't see how it can be switching the burden to say "I never said he could stick his dick in me, but he did." + "Yeah, I stuck my dick in her (tellingly NOT she stuck my dick in her) even though she never actually came out and said I could, but she must have wanted it." = rape? Seems pretty cut and dry to me. The only way for possible confusion is if you'd had enthusiastic consent in a similar situation before and thought there was an extension of that to furure situations.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:31 AM
6

Eh, the state generally only pursues that in the case it has a stake such as an underage oregnancy which places a potential undue burden on the welfare system and is clearly detrimental to the ubderage parent's mental and physical well being in addition to the burden on public systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:17 AM
0

Life pro tip: Asking never spoils the mood the first time we do something we haven't done together before. Long lasting relationships are built on doing things you're mutually enthusiastic about doing together. Trying something one or both of you aren't sure about is totally cool, but requires extra communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:15 AM
8

Nope, I live in a two party state. If both parties dont consent to recording, it will never see the inside of a courtroom unless it occurred in an area with conspicuous reasons (signs usually) to believe there was no expectation of privacy. You can literally record a video of her saying "I plan to falsely accuse you of rape in may 2016" and won't be able to use it in your defense if you do it secretly. No matter how hard you want your fantasy to be true, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:09 AM
3

Affirmative consent seems to me like it can be as simple as "she unbuckled my pants and attempted to place my penis inside her, your honor." You can assent with actions, but getting enthusiastic consent from partners for intimate activity doesn't seem like its moving the burden of proof. Can you explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 04:50 AM
4

I've been married almost 9 years, my boyfriend and I are going on one year, and I love it. I don't quite have the arrangement above, becAuse without feelings I don't know why I'd want to fuck. I had a traumatic beginning to my active sex life and it took awhile to hit my stride with enjoying sex vs doing it for the other person's pleasure, so maybe that's part of it, but I'd always considered monogamy weird. I get more concerned about emotional intimacy than physical for whatever reason. My husb…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 03:02 AM
1

Nobody wants to be settled for. If you're insincere people sense it, and it comes off as creepy man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 01:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter