TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PixyFreakingStix Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by PixyFreakingStix on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-13

The fact that you guys have to repost the same bullshit from months (years?) ago shows how little you actually have to complain about. Keep feeding your impotent little perpetual outrage machine.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:38 PM
1

I can get on board with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 01:32 AM
1

Well, I suppose that could be true, but everyone that really does hate women is going to be super attracted to this sub, and I'd argue the majority of misogynists are also racists. I'll put aside my skepticism that this sub isn't filled with the biggest assholes on the planet, but surely you're not surprised that it attracts the biggest assholes on the planet... Maybe not every person that wants to see a woman get her comeuppance is a misogynist, but every person that's a misogynistic wants to s…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 01:10 AM
1

You've got a sub dedicated to hating women and you're really surprised there's a bunch of racists in here?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 12:43 AM
5

FYI there is a waiting list for men to get shelter in most cities. Women on the other hand get shelter immediately, regardless of space. I'm not trying to say this is right or wrong, but the reason for it is that women are less capable of defending themselves, and more likely to be assaulted. I'm not disagreeing that pointing out that 1 in 4 homeless people are women as though that's particularly bad is... kind of weird, at best... but regardless, homeless men sleep in the cold. Homeless women s…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:55 PM
1

I just can't imagine why everybody stopped taking you guys seriously...
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:35 PM
1

Of course, there's no evidence here that that's what you got banned for... Not that any of you care.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:52 AM
1

Good ol' Dailymail. I'm sure this is totally legitimate.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:00 PM
8

If Hillary Clinton said anything remotely like that, you and the rest of this subreddit would be blowing the fuck up over it and you damn well know it.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 08:07 PM
6

So, does that mean you think articles like this shouldn't be written about anybody, or just pointing out the perceived double standard? Either way, women are sexualized far, far more than men are. If there wasn't a history of women being sexualized when they don't want to be, being subjugated via their sexuality, and generally having their rights stepped on (or, conversely, if there was a history of men dealing with those things) you'd see either say people flipping out over this article or peop…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:14 PM
-37

Not that you people care, but women don't overwhelmingly win in family courts. They are overwhelmingly not contested in family courts. When custody is actually contested, for example, fathers win just over 51% of the time. This is true in America, at least. Your post title makes it sound like this is generally true in the western world, and it's not.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 02:23 PM
1

Not the comments. The submission itself.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:23 AM
0

By the way, I got the info in this thread deleted.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:14 AM
-16

Because you're not that bright would be my guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:43 PM
1

Well, that's fair, honestly.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:32 PM
2

Her cowardice I agree. or heartlessness She clearly feels for the guy. bald faced lying Where did she do this? Refusing to simply clear someone's name with a few words is way worse than bad shit. It is the definition of bad shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:31 PM
-22

What benefit does she deserve? What benefit does anyone deserve? Do you automatically assume the worst possible interpretation of everything that every person ever does? She clearly said he did not do it but won't publicly say it because of her BF! She was reluctant to, yes. She deserves to be criticized for this. But so does Luke, apparently. What kind of asshole boyfriend would respond that way? What context do we need? Whether or not she actually accused him of this, for starters. Because tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:22 PM
-1

Dude, people like to have evidence, if we automatically believe the accuser, literally every woman in a first world country would have power and send every guy they don't like into jail. When did I say, or even imply, that anyone should be convicted with insufficient evidence? All I said is that there generally is insufficient evidence in cases of actual rape, and so most actual rapists go actually free. People falsely accused hardly ever get punished at all, in any way. Also only morons have an…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:09 PM
-3

In my life, I was raped and wasn't believed and gave up. And while the evidence both of us have for this part of the argument is anecdotal and more or less useless, mine's a hell of a lot stronger than yours. You being "shunned" for looking (and... maybe acting?) creepy, and someone insulting you by saying you look like a rapist... the way to interpret that isn't that people actually thought you were a rapist. They were just being mean. Besides, you must think women are absolute saints to have t…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:07 PM
-43

What part of what she said makes you think she was trying to? She said she never said that, but that she didn't go out of her way to stop the rumor from spreading, and didn't realize it was that bad. This being the sub that it is, naturally you're not interested in giving her any sort of benefit of the doubt given the lack of context, but her hearing of a rumor and just rolling her eyes and walking away from it isn't exactly unheard of. And yeah, I'd agree that she should have stepped up and sai…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:01 PM
-19

Not people in here, anyway. This place is like a fucking "i hate girls" cathedral. Reasonable people, though, yes. There tends not to be sufficient evidence to get a rape case to trial, let alone convict. Socially? Well, let's just say people like you guys are depressingly common, and a lot of people still assume a victim is lying if she isn't busted up and bleeding, or that it was her fault. Getting assaulted in a back ally and mauled isn't the only way to get raped, buuut... something tells me…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 10:45 PM
-27

When has an "SJW" (whatever you mean by that) ever said that, let alone frequently enough that you can say "SJWs" say it? The argument is that false rape accusations are rare, and the ones that do happen rarely result in anything bad happening to the accused, either legally or socially. Hell, actual rapists are rarely punished legally or socially.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 10:21 PM
-41

How would you prefer she describe it? "Bad shit" sounds about right to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 10:18 PM
1

It's kind of funny how this kind of thing is always linked via Daily Fucking Mail and not anywhere else, and usually without any context.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 10:17 PM
1

From which you were able to tell that out of all the rapes reported in America, a higher percentage of the perpetrators were black than the percentage of murderers was black? Does the FBI cross reference this data, or did you do it yourself?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:57 PM
1

May I ask what data shows that this is true? I don't necessarily think it changes anything, but regardless, where did you get this data?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:13 AM
1

What makes you think it does? I think the kind of rape where you assault somebody in a back alley might be primarily committed by the poor, but that's a small portion of actual rapes. When you say primarily, do you just mean more than 50%?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:36 AM
0

I'm sure you're not a fan of WHTM, but you may want to read the email response he got from the NISVS about this. Edit: Oh please. Cathy Young? She's an anti-feminist gamergator, who cites only Christina Hoff Sommers (who is basically insane) as "critics" of the CDC's findings is about. If I found you an article with Anita Sarkeesian quoting Zoe Quinn as a supporter of these findings, you'd waste no time shitting yourself over it.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:06 AM
2

I was going to reply to all of your points here, but I'll just focus on this; It isn't fair to the large majority of males and females in the world to repeatedly subject them to 'helpful and informative' messages that really only are targetting smaller more specific groups. What? How do you target only future rapists? And how on earth is it not fair? That seems like a completely ridiculous claim.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:57 PM
1

I think you misunderstood what I'm saying. I don't think it's racist to recognize that middle-eastern immigrants (not all of them, but they in particular are in need of this) need to be taught how to live in western culture. Do you? Maybe that will be ineffective, but it's not racist. If you don't, then why would it be sexist to target men with this? The vast, vast majority of sexual assault is committed by men. Saying we need to do something so that men rape less women seems reasonable to me. S…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:52 PM
-4

Unless not everyone understands what rape is, or why it's bad. For example, coercing someone into saying yes to sex is something that a lot of men do. They'll often ignore clear signs of "no," and sometimes ignore a straight up "stop" because of how often men are made to believe that a woman doesn't really mean it when she says no. How many people don't think getting a woman too drunk to consent is not actually a problem? How many people think women are just making up how awful rape is? I had a …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:35 PM
1

Is it possible (regardless of the cause) for a problem is so common or so severe that a particular group, be it gender, religion, race or otherwise actually does need to be targeted in some cases? I'm thinking middle-eastern immigrants in Europe as an example. I don't think it's racist to recognize that. Do you?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:26 PM
-6

So, there are... how many cases of this happening every year? And there are how many cases of rape each year? What is the point of this supposed to be, exactly?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:09 PM
2

Oh, there must be some cases where the child truly wanted it, and truly wasn't taken advantage of. I'm saying that it doesn't matter. Prosecute it like rape even if that was true.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 12:44 AM
0

/r/menrights, folks.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:03 AM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:03 AM
1

I'm currently with someone that works under me in work, and my boss is married to one of the other employees in the company. What company? Because if it's a bigger one, I'd be shocked if you weren't violating company policy, and can lose your job for this. So unless it's like a 25 man operation in Podunk USA, you might want to be careful about admitting that if there's anyone that can dox you. People seem to think that all these were forced encounters No they don't, and I certainly haven't, and …
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:27 PM
0

I disagree, but that's fair. It's very difficult to prove there was no coercion, even if you can get someone to enthusiastically say there was none. And coercion is such a massive problem in these kinds of relationships. Just think about how easy it would be to scare a student you wanted to fuck into being afraid of being expelled or suspended or having their grades fucked up. Or using the promise of letting a student pass a class for sexual favors. And that's barely scratching the surface. Beca…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:11 PM
1

But, again, I didn't call it rape. I said it should be prosecuted as rape. It's just like with this nonsense about not being able to consent when you are drunk. Ah, right, I forgot I was in /r/mensrights for a second. Thanks for reminding me.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:39 PM
1

Can we compromise in saying that we don't prosecute it under the word "rape" but that the penalties and procedures are exactly the same as if it was rape?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:25 PM
2

And I'm saying a student understanding his or her choice does not permit a k-12 teacher to have sex with them students under any circumstances.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:24 PM
0

But it's not being classified as rape. It's being prosecuted as rape. I really don't see what you're not understanding.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:53 PM
2

Who do you think I am labeling as pedophiles? Not the the teachers. Having sex with a student doesn't make you a pedophile. Right, but I just pointed out that not every case of teacher/student relations is rape. You're right. And not every case of a father having sex with his 6 year old daughter is rape, by the way you're using the word rape. Do you think the father Should still be prosecuted as a rapist?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:53 PM
1

But that's not what anyone is acting like. Can 13 year olds consent? Can 10 year olds? Everyone is different, right? Why draw the line at 16 or 14 or anywhere? Maybe there's a toddler that really wants to have sex with his father. Who are we to deny that? We're not talking about whether or not the student truly wanted it, or truly liked it. We're talking about your second sentence. Teachers shouldn't be having sex with students. Why not? Because they wield power over the student. Coercion. And t…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:41 PM
1

Are you defending pedophilia, then? Even if both parties are okay?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:34 PM
2

You're speaking really generally. That's correct, as I should be. I'm speaking generally about pedophilia, too.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:31 PM
1

Do you mean to say that circumstances can't change whether or not someone can give consent? Like, there are circumstances where you can say yes, but that yes can be forced from you. You agree with that right? Teachers have power over students. They can affect their grades, they can get them suspended or even expelled. There are all kinds of things a teacher can hang over a student's head, especially when they're minors. That's a huge part of the reason that bosses in most places aren't allowed t…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:30 PM
4

I don't care what their experience was. I'm not talking about their experience. I wouldn't be talking about a child's experience if her father had sex with her. It wouldn't matter if she liked it. You are not allowed to have sex with your children if they are minors. And K12 teachers are not allowed to have sex with their students. I'm perfectly happy drawing a clear line there, despite the fact that some victims of pedophiles had fun with it, and some people had fun having sex with their teache…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:21 PM
5

Because the risk of coercion is so high in a student/teacher relationship, and of how difficult it is to prove rape (the vast majority of rapists go unpunished). You don't need to have sex with your teachers, and your teachers don't need to have sex with you. And besides, if you were ten years old and saying that about an adult, it'd still be exactly the same thing, only more severe. The reason every case of pedophilia is prosecuted like it is is the same reason every case of K-12 teacher/studen…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:19 PM
3

I think that enters into a gray area. The student may not have been raped, but because of the power differential between students and teachers, it should be prosecuted as rape in every case involving minors, without exception. Statutory rape doesn't mean that the minor that had sex felt raped, and didn't love every second of it. But that can be true of pedophiles too, and lots of other things. There's no way to determine if the child was truly harmed or truly coerced or anything like that, but i…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:06 PM
17

Joke or not, there are literally tens of thousands of people that would agree with it. You think everyone that "liked" it merely thought it was funny? Feminists, despite MRM circlejerking, don't actually get offended by jokes as much as we get pissed off at the fact that people agree with the premise of the joke. This is clearly one of those cases. This says something about society. People don't think pretty women can take advantage of teenage boys. They don't think this is rape. That's not okay…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:35 PM
1

I haven't attempted to give you any sort of answer, let alone a real one, and until you admit your dishonesty, I don't intend to. There is no reason to lie about being 20; your story would have worked just as well if you were any other age. Tell your "coworker" I said hello. I don't believe you, I'm not going to believe you, and I'm not going to engage with you on the original topic unless you come clean. edit: Did you lie here as well, about being a second year AFM? (which I presume stands for …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:10 PM
1

I don't intend to "answer your point" because I think you're dishonest. I'll tell you what, if you flatly admit that you are, in reality, a 20 year old pot-smoking League of Legends playing college drop-out, who invented a story about a child and an ex girlfiend in an attempt to lend credence to his position, I'll reconsider having this conversation with you.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:24 PM
1

No, I don't want to talk to someone who is liar. There are lots of good people to talk to.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:04 PM
1

You'll forgive me for assuming your claim that you're presently a 20 year old pot-smoking league of legends college dropout is more likely, I hope. You openly insulted me, made absolutely no argument for your case, then lied about having a kid, and then lied to cover your ass. I'm not interested in discussing this with you further.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:42 PM
0

I want to first start this off by saying sorry about how I spoke to you earlier. I got super super flustered by this thread and overreacted hard. Thanks for being civil in your replies regardless. You're welcome, but I think you're about to not like me very much again... I'm currently in my mid 20s, as is my girlfriend, and our child will be turning 6 soon. How do you explain this comment? And please don't scold me for looking through your comment history. There's nothing wrong with that, and I …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:24 PM
1

So, let me ask a few questions here, if you don't mind. How old are you, your child and your girlfriend? How much are you paying in child support your your ex doesn't have to work while also raising a child? Did you obtain your economics degree? And for what it's worth, if she's cute, she's likely not paying for much of anything if she goes clubbing.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:55 PM
0

This is the sort of thing people say when they want to dispute something, but don't actually have an argument. And when they don't have an argument, they tend to append their comments with insults as well. If you have an argument, make it, otherwise I'm content to laugh your comment off as typical MRA bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:24 PM
-1

Well, of the other parent, most of whom tend to be men. Men who fight for custody of the child win it slightly more than 50% of the time. It's just that the vast, vast majority of men don't. Also, "financial slavery of men" is rather hyerbolic, don't you think? It's like calling taxation financial slavery of citizens. And if that's what you want to call it, then fine, but in that case, financially slavery actually is the best thing. I think child support should be diffused among all taxpayers. T…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:22 PM
-3

You do that, crime rates are going to skyrocket, period. And financially coercing people into abortions is shitty. I agree, we shouldn't force either parent to pay child support. There should be public funding of child support. But until that is a viable option, the best thing for society is that it's mandatory.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:22 AM
7

Please do.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:41 AM
-1

So, you think that's because you will get drafted? I mean, the answer seems obvious to me. Old conservatives are idiots. If you get rid of the ability to draft, you're going to look "weak on terror" or something. It'd political suicide to draft people again. So, yeah, men have to register for the draft, and that sorta sucks I guess, but you're never going to get drafted. Look, I don't think I'm playing fast and loose with the definition of "privilege" if I say that it doesn't count unless it's a…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:35 AM
-5

I gotta say, the response to this comment has got to be the mensrightsiest thing I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:33 AM
-3

I've been posting for 2 years and lurked for a year before that. I have never seen what you are talking about I'd say the same thing for the feminist groups I've interacted with, yet I'm sure it happens. Feminists can be assholes, and so can you guys, and everyone else.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:32 PM
-7

Burden of proof lies with the claimant so i'm going to say your full of shit. I'm really not sure how to rephrase my previous comment in a way that you'll understand what I meant. I seriously don't care if you believe me, but when I say that a sub of 100,000 notoriously angry young men has members that have been mean to someone who disagreed with them, it seems like a pretty weird thing to be skeptical of. Not that I care. Respond if you want, but I'm turning off inbox replies on this one.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:29 PM
-9

I don't particularly care what you think.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:17 PM
-11

It's really weird that you'd think a sub of 100,000+ people who are actually sort of infamous on Reddit and elsewhere for being really, really angry would be incapable of having people that would do this. But then, you're part of /r/mensrights, and so thinking critically and honestly about things probably isn't your forte. 'I have no argument therefore screw you, I'm leaving'. Nobody is going to be drafted, probably ever again. Feminists have fought for women to be in combat roles. It's a stupid…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:18 PM
-14

Then I think people shouldn't get the impression that this subreddit normalizes calling dissenters "fat, ugly, and brainwashed". I don't care what impression people get. When I disagreed, that's what happened to me, and to pretend like this is something feminists do and mensrightsers don't is, at the very best, dishonest. Be impressed by that however you want.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:46 PM
-11

It happened to me on three separate occasions before I gave up trying to have discussions here. That was more than a year ago. Maybe /r/mensrights has cleaned up its act, though I've seen enough of it lately to think that isn't true. As I recall, the posts were moderately upvoted, and mine were buried. Anyway, that happened on my first account, now deleted.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:59 PM
-20

Yeah, you're right, /r/mensrights is pretty well-known on Reddit for its candid, thoughtful conversations and well-mannered userbase. Paul Elam is pretty much a saint. I don't know why I thought I'd be able to pull the wool over anybody's eyes, but it seems I got brigaded favorably, so it doesn't matter, huh? The Fempire wins again.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:44 PM
-19

I had another account which I deleted that would be about three years old by now, and an alt that's a few months old. I stand by what I said, though. edit: Basically, if we're talking about male and female privilege, and you bring up the draft, that's my cue to stop paying attention.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:42 PM
1

Funny. When I disagreed with /r/mensrights, I got called fat, ugly, brainwashed and stupid too.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter