TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PlayMeWhile Archive

View 7 posts and 374 comments by PlayMeWhile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Seems very fitting: turth is a pathless land
/r/MGTOW19/04/15 12:12 PM
8

That was actually quite good. I didn't like the typical usage of such words as "privilege" and the rest. But the content itself had a very nice ring to it. But for every one like her there are tens if not hundreds of other self proclaimed "feminists" who will soon reach their teens and start writing blogs.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:20 AM
10

:D Is this a joke or is it real? can't tell...
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:28 AM
5

Don't get fooled. All they care is the little girl. Father is there just to add some weight.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:48 PM
2

I was saying it from the point of impact. Saying "raping is bad" to the rapist is not gonna work. I mean - he knows raping is bad. He still does it. Meanwhile giving advice to an alcoholic about checking his surroundings first before getting drunk can have an impact. At least he/she is rational before drinking and is probably willing to take protective measures. So i think the message to protect yourself is better than the usual "don't tell me to watch out, tell rapists not to rape" which sounds…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:15 PM
1

Now you just lost it. In your first reply to me you attack me about my spelling. Which is not addressing the discussion. Then you say I should not claim high ground because of the spelling again. (And I admitted that I am not the best speller here). And after that you said: "If you say a man or woman seducing someone whilst they are drunk is less serious you are giving the message it is more OK." Which is again not at all relevant to the discussion at hand. Because neither I nor the person I rep…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:51 PM
2

I overreacted about a usage of a single word. Might be influenced by that book about logic I read yesterday. ... Simple as that. Props to you for remaining cool about it.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:02 PM
1

I suggested you should be embarrassed by your spelling if you were taking the high ground by your criticism and suggested superior understanding. I didn't suggest superior understanding. What you are saying is that if I am to disagree with someone I have to be superior to them in every regard? I give credit for superior spelling and understanding of English to every poster here, since I am not a native English speaker. But me not being able to write proper English in no way invalids everything e…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:01 PM
5

That was just an advice to refrain from claiming something to be a logical conclusion when expressing something other than that. It was not an insult, but it sounded like one. So you are free to take it as an insult if you like. On reflection I should have written it in a better tone, but I was in a strange mood.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:28 PM
0

I didn't say "embarrassment from being misunderstood" I said "embarrassed and misunderstood", which are different things. Regarding the spelling - I never claimed my sentence to be written correctly. But the OP claimed his to be a logical conclusion, which is not. If someone says that sea is blue and the logical conclusion of it is that fish fly - I might have misunderstood what the message was. Or the deliverer might have misunderstood what "logic" is. Hence the reply.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:22 PM
–

Don't try to use logic until you learn how to do it. Otherwise you will probably find youself in a similar situation you are now: embarrassed and missunderstood.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:38 AM
–

Don't get so drunk that you can be gangbanged without remembering it is a better tip.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:34 AM
2

Came to say this. Women are not CEOs because they don't start companies. Men don't have meetups because they don't start social groups.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 12:26 AM
1

Yup - your taxes could have gone to finance those things if you live there.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:56 AM
3

The discussion was a childish-bashing of MRM in the beginning, but towards the end it gets more reasonable.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:51 AM
2

In my experience it's hard to have any kind of discussion on facebook. People start feeling attacked and get defensive. A lot of the arguments there often degenerate towards "are you telling me I cannot post on my wall?" type of stuff.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 10:42 PM
–

Can we get some sources on this inside the thread?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:46 PM
1

3/10: wouldn't shag.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:18 AM
0

She is surely a getaway for girls and women. personally I would take barbarossaaaa over GWW. And GWW a close second.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:53 AM
-3

Welcome to second wave of Mens Rights. We have "stop shaming the decision to circumcise your son" and "denying patriarchy makes us look bad" threads to look forward to. The whole ordeal probably started with some "progressive" ideas like egalitarianism. There are a few people (like you and sometimes me) who mention this in the comments or threads. However the movement is probably to big to steer already. It is going where it is going... Best action it seems (for me at least) is to support MRM as…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:52 PM
8

Sure. Ideally MRM has it's say and someone listens and the nature of these laws are examined. Best course of action for me and probably a lot of us. No sentencing occurs and awareness is raised. But if the options are between jailing and jailing men or applying equal standards, jailing few women and getting awareness that way I must say I prefer the latter. And not because it is a women that gets jailed, but because that is the quicker way.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:16 PM
–

Sure, I am not saying it is the preferable way. I am saying that MRM exist for quite a few years now, trying best to convey the ridiculous nature of these laws to the public. However little is changed. So if change is achieved quicker by exposing the other gender to the same standards - I welcome it. The way that puts less people in these situations is preferable.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:58 PM
–

I suspect it is ridiculous for no other reason than activism of a certain group and a culture of rape hysteria. If it takes sentencing of a few women for society to finally open the eyes so be it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:56 PM
1

If I may suggest a short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNttiuddy6E
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:58 AM
2

Yes I manged to spot some crazier ones later on. But by now I have seen so much stuff like this that it stopped having an effect. Women can be sociopaths as well. I don't know why they feel that "DTB" is the best response. To even have a three letter phrase for suggesting a divorce.. But it's how it works. Men should of course wake up to this. I've read a few books written by women about women's infidelity. There were a lot of cases examined and the author concluded that a lot of women simply ha…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:04 AM
10

I see. Well there are people who write blog posts advocating men to pass to the other side of the streets when approaching a woman in the dark so to not scare her or make her feel intimidated. Then there are women interpreting almost any kind of conversation as sexism and any kind of attention as creepy. And they file workplace complaints about that. Having this in mind it's not a surprise that some men do take the message and simply avoid women. Just natural. Further they are doing zero harm to…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:22 AM
-5

There are men (dare I say most men) who would feel uneasy about their wives working in porn industry, or some kind of exotic dance club. Hell maybe even dancing salsa with a dancer partner. On the other hand there are women who get insecure about their husband watching porn or flirting with other women. To me it just looks natural. Regarding the "bad advices given to the OP" I quickly glimpsed through them and the majority appeared to be sane to me. Sure there are some weird ones, but what do we…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:59 AM
–

MGTOW is simply a statement of self-ownership for men. I find nothing extreme about that. Otherwise - ya. If there were any no women allowed policies here, you would see them written on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:35 PM
11

She has a whole blog related to hacking the kernel bitching about women not being praised enough in tech: http://sarah.thesharps.us/
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:48 AM
8

btw, linux sucks. Looking for attention? :)
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:19 AM
26

wow, feminists arguing against sexualization of women? Aren't they slut-shaming? :D If you want to understand those people - I have one advice: think about feminism as reactionary movement based on personal emotions and too much free time. It will all make sense.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:15 AM
2

Are there certain options that men are not allowed? I mean I often hear that men cannot show feelings because of society. But this is not against the law. So I see no problem.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:28 PM
-2

I think I will let this go without understanding what you were trying to say.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:20 PM
0

Again I will just repeat what you wrote: Frankly if you think what lies between your legs determines your ability in any area other than reproduction you are a bigot. And my statement is this: men are better at basketball and wrestling than women. Does this make me a bigot or simply sane?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:03 PM
-1

Don't mean to offend you or anything, but: Frankly if you think what lies between your legs determines your ability in any area other than reproduction you are a bigot. Oh there are differences.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:31 PM
4

Frankly if you think what lies between your legs determines your ability in any area other than reproduction you are a bigot. So you imply there are no differences between men and women other than organs of reproduction?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:56 PM
2

Why are people calling this creature "lady"?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:11 AM
6

Catcalling offends and intimidates a lot of women. And boogeyman intimidates a lot of children. My suggestion is growing up.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:25 AM
2

It's cool, less to argue about :)
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:41 AM
1

I see. So the laws are different. I do find it weird that people can't choose to use their home as they see fit, but maybe there are reasons for it. Considering the past and all the slavery. Maybe society just wants to come to terms with history and make amends, I don't know. The affirmative action stuff looks really crazy to me too. I think most of MRM would agree with this. OK, really nice talking with you. I think I learned something useful after this conversation. I will be going to sleep no…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:39 AM
1

is what if they are the ONLY provider of an essential good or service. In that case I would argue against the monopoly of the service provided. If the government is providing such service - then no discrimination should be default, because the business is not private, but public. If some person is providing the service - he should not be able to hold a monopoly. So other people can compete with him and eventually out-compete him by allowing a broader range of customers (other races). And discrim…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:03 AM
0

There are different kinds of laws. If we are talking about laws that supposedly prevent the society from disintegrating to chaos - I don't think they are needed. Simply because if society would be that barbaric - laws would not function. If we are talking about the laws that are forced on the public, then yes, they come without any grounding in morality and certainly shift it in some way. Often in the less moral direction (like the laws that you cannot give money to the beggars). The fact that p…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:57 AM
1

To me, it fails when you start seeing how people can be denied basic services based on race/gender/whatever. Well but they can go to a different provider of the same service. And by doing that they will bring less profit to the racist one. So it's a good thing. Also it can backfire. For example if I were black and I would be working as a car repairman I certainly would not want to repair a car of any racist bigot. However the laws don't allow me this choice... Interesting discussion by the way. …
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:48 AM
3

Bobby Fischer about why there are so many Russians in chess
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:42 AM
0

Might really be. I can offer part of my answer that I just typed to another person I am talking with. Consider slavery. Slaves were freed. Is this a result of a law or evolution and social awareness by the public? I think awareness comes first, laws come second. Without social stimulus for change, no laws would be passed to free the slaves. With the same argument - if we would abolish the law, the awareness would remain and slavery would not be back.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:39 AM
0

Of course they would own slaves again. People will do what they are allowed to, especially if it's profitable. You'd have NO RIGHT to set them free - BY YOUR OWN ARGUMENT! they are private property, which you have absolute freedom over. Kill em'. If you studied that time period, you'd understand why your argument has many, many, fallacies. Maybe. Maybe not. I am certainly not the only one thinking that humans evolved socially. The best example I can give is the fact that those laws were passed i…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:36 AM
1

This discussion is slowly turning to the discussion about laws. Well my opinion is that laws don't really do that much. If all the laws regarding race would be erased from the books in Canada - I don't think there would be a race/cultural war starting anytime soon. And if it would - then Canada must be hell of a place even now. It's kind of weird to imagine that every group over there hate each other, but are being nice simply because they play by the books... I'm reasonably sure this would be i…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:23 AM
0

Are you misunderstanding my position on purpose? Maybe I am unable to explain it clearly... hm I will leave an article which has a better explanation, if you will have time or interest, here it is: http://mcfloogle.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/allow-free-discrimination-for-a-better-society/ They have no right to not obey a black police officer This is different. I am arguing for a right to decide what to do with your own property. a business is subject to regulation and is a public-facing entity. So…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:14 AM
-1

I don't think what I outlined was total freedom. This is not total freedom. This is basic freedom. I would say this: In a democracy, like we are having now. Majority rule is the law. So if majority is racist - society is racist and we will get racist laws. That's just the definition of democracy. I don't think there is such a thing as "hate group". hate is earned, people are not born haters. If majority of the people hate something, there should be a reason for it. Like Americans today hate Nazi…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:54 AM
1

I don't consider myself racist, but I don't really know what can be framed as "racism" these days. Thankfully I am outside of USA and any free opinion I have won't get me in legal trouble (funny how that sounded). Anyway, I am not sure you fully understood my position. I am for equal rights. Most important of those rights are: freedom to freely decide what to do with your own property. Freedom of choice. Freedom of speech. If someone is saying that he doesn't like Asians, because he thinks they …
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:34 AM
5

Might be the case. If more of them were playing maybe we would see better results, but that is speculation. As for the best chess players they are most often on the boarder of being a prodigy. Judit Polgar included, she played decent chess when she was 10, and probably before that. Getting a bunch of random women interested in chess probably won't have any significant improvement at the top of the ratings.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:28 AM
0

I am aware of some arguments against my position, but none to be reasonable enough to change it.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:25 AM
6

I don't think it would be a farce like basketball or boxing for example. But well. The best female player is Judit Polgar. Now she is at the 52nd place worldwide overall. Even if we take her peak rating (highest achieved through lifetime) she woulds still be placed at ~20th place. List here: http://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml However again - Polgár is the only woman to have won a game from a current world number one player, and has defeated nine current or former world champions in either rapid o…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:55 PM
0

I'm black myself (mixed race though), but I would consider myself to be trustworthy. This is really not about you. It was an example. Yet, in your example that shop owner should be allowed to refuse me employment, based solely on his erroneous perceptions. The shop is his, not yours. You should have no right to that place. To work there is not a right. It is a permission or an invitation, granted by the owner. And he should have all the rights to decide what kind of people he wants and does not …
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:55 PM
0

Yes, that's the thing see. I know your argument is coming from best intentions and I think there are a lot of good reasons to agree with your position. I just happen to be slightly of a different opinion for one reason or the other. It is great that we can agree to disagree. Little differences should not be the basis for conflict.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:35 PM
-2

what do you mean by "accountable" in this case?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:30 PM
–

And I believe that employment is a contract between two people. And both of those people can have any preferences they wish. As an example employee might not want to work for white people, as it can remind him of slavery. Employer might not want to hire black people, because he thinks they are not trust-worthy. I don't see why should anyone force them to act against their wishes. It's their business, not ours.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:34 PM
-4

This reminds me of a case I heard a long time ago where a bus driver asked a female passenger to switch seats, because she was too attractive and he could see her through the mirror; couldn't concentrate. She took him to the court and he won. I think this is a similar situation. I am with the dentist. It takes a lot of professionalism to admit ones weaknesses and act against your instincts. And I think he should have all the rights to choose an assistant he is most comfortable with. Generally wh…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:28 PM
–

yes even that.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:19 PM
–

Don't Talk To Strangers
/r/MensRights05/07/13 11:16 AM
2

Don't let the "medical benefit" thing get you. Doesn't it sound weird that someone would need to chop some bits off of a newly born baby for him to be healthier? No 1. Medical benefit that is often cited - it will be cleaner/easier to clean. But this is same with any part of the body. Cut it off - it will be cleaner. Cutting an ear off might make the ear easier to clean. No 2. Is that circumcision reduced the chance of getting AIDS. Really? How could that even function. I know one way - circumci…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:39 AM
11

I found your comment regarding piercing the ears of a little girl from a few days ago: and she has pierced ears. I think people shouldn't pierce their kids ears until they can explain what is going to happen and make sure the kid understands before doing so. otherwise, to me, it just seems mean. And now you are asking this sub about circumcision. Are you trolling us? Please.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:30 PM
13

We can break it down like this: 1) You do it. Your son is cut. He grows up - he is a circumcised man. 2) You don't do it. Your son is intact. He grows up - he has all the choices still available to him. He can do the procedure if he so wishes. Or he can live uncircumcised. Why would you limit his options? Some day he will be a grown-up man. Which one of these people do you think is most capable of deciding his future: You, Your man, a doctor, Your son? Furthermore, regarding culture. The culture…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:56 PM
14

Here is a relevant video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN5DFXpmPpM
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:06 PM
2

In my opinion your post is a very accurate representation of the situation. But I think there are some additional angles to it. Namely companies and corporations are always lacking talented people from STEM areas. What they are trying to do is promote the idea that STEM is sexy and fish for students. However the reality (at least from my experience) is that, like you wrote, STEM career is not a job which you can take lightly like most "easier" jobs. You, in general, can't be good in what you do …
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:25 PM
6

My reaction was more like: Who is Paul Elam?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:42 PM
2

I, personally, just hate feminism. I am honest enough to admit it. Not feminists, but feminism. The fact that it is treated like some sort of science with all it's pseudo-scientific and politics. I hate the poisoning and degrading of biology that goes with it. I can't stand when political correctness gets in the way of truth. When someone with degree in women studies can "refute" evolutionary psychology by making feel-good comments. When ignorance is applauded, no evidence required. When the rea…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:40 PM
0

Where the heck did I attack you???? Maybe attack was a bad word. But all your replies to me seemed hostile for some reason. Seemed like you had an issue with me not presenting my own views and denying you the opportunity to attack them. Maybe that's just me thou, let's leave this for others to decide.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:00 PM
1

if the person doesn't hold the beliefs they are stating, it seems like a waste of my time to have a conversation with them to change their mind/inform them of another viewpoint/etc Did you come here to change views? The way I read your post - it was a question. So I said that the philosophy of this subreddit is a bit different, pointed to places with more people to answer your questions, and even gave my version of their believes. And you attack me for expressing an idea that I do not believe in…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:28 PM
2

Not sure how to respond to a hypothetical argument from a perspective you don't have. Like to argue with individuals instead of ideas? That's a bad habit.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:25 PM
-1

Just like SarcastiCock said - try /r/theredpill or /r/mgtow And to answer the question - your mistake was in assuming that men want marriage. Women don't want to marry rich jerks as well. They want to fuck with rich jerks till they are young and once those same rich jerks start refusing and looking for other women, they turn and look for a sweet caring guy to marry. So the sweet and caring guy is a loser (within this context) in every sense. He failed to sleep with women when they were younger a…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:18 PM
71

I know that I'm probably completely unwelcome here, as both a feminist and a female. You are welcome here, this is not feminism nor SRS. While it is true that I want to be able to be paid equally, and have the same awesome opportunities any male would. Same awesome opportunities? Not sure what are you talking about here. To me it is always strange, see, how a feminist can look and point at (i.e.) CEOs and say: we want more CEO women. Read a life story of any great man, and you will often find th…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:19 PM
10

My typical responses are as follows: Women give birth to all the men in the world. They are most often the primary caregivers before the boys go to school. Then, once in school, all the boys are under the authority of teachers that are female far more often than not. Then, when you get to voting (which is main source of power in any modern country) - women have the advantage by 1st - outnumbering the men in most of populations and 2nd - actually being more active in social life and voting more o…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:39 PM
20

And I think you confused a situation within a family with a public situation. You are not an incubator and milk producer for random strangers on the subway. So by the same logic any man should not be a body guard for you in that same subway. This has nothing to do with your marriage.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:22 AM
4

You know you are in the Men's Rights v2.0. (or maybe second wave?) when saying that one should not get butt-hurt about books for kids is considered progressive enough to collect upvotes. What I mean is that this sub came a full circle. First it was "we are not like feminists - we don't consider hurt feelings a problem". Then it was "we can't stand social presurz!" then you can easily get downvoted to hell if you expressed a disagreement about a certain topic being an issue. And now the same disa…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:03 PM
5

That is a good point I've never thought about before.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:12 AM
1

State is now so worried about the condition of marriage that they are spewing propaganda...
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:44 PM
8

Jesus, what a whiny female. Someone should suggest her to keep those "patriarchal society" fairy tales out of discussions about real world.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:49 PM
10

Did anyone watch the second video, when they are talking about suicide rates? Statements like "suicide rates for women increased by ~30% percent, while for men ~20% percent". Yet no overall data on the ratio of men to women committing suicides. Seems they will turn every corner in their mental maze just to avoid mentioning the fact that suicide numbers in men are few times higher than women.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:31 PM
9

Not so much when making tons of money... But if you have a family, work your ass off to make the living easier for them and then get divorced, forbidden to see your kids, forced to keep working like a slave for that "family" you once had, even when the only thing you were working for (the children) is long gone. I might do it in that situation.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:25 PM
3

Comments not allowed, ratings disabled. Some great feedback she is getting there.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:19 AM
1

"IF you think about someone like Charles Manson - You put him out". The guy didn't even kill anyone :)
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:50 AM
183

"You poor thing". I liked that. Will make it my default attitude to all the female-specific problems for a while.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 08:02 PM
3

If being pedo-necro-homo-zoophile were really a choise every man would be fucking dead male puppies within 10 minutes of ever divorcing a woman.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:38 AM
2

If you want to vent you might find http://www.mgtowforums.com/ forum section enjoyable. A lot of people there going through similar stuff.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:05 AM
1

I don't think fights ever go like those pictures
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:06 AM
1

One asshole is just an asshole, one racist is just a racist, etc.; however, when you move those things to a societal level, you get slavery, the holocaust, and things like that. The societal level of our perceptions surrounding gender and sexuality, of which this is part, have lead to the deadbeat dad/child support situation, contributed to the custody issues fathers face, created rape hysteria and related laws, etc. This is speculation from beginning to end. Slavery most likely was not a produc…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 10:50 AM
2

It is a clip originally uploaded to youtube by barbarossssaa (now his username is "bar bar"). But I was not able to find it on his channel today. So maybe it was taken off. EDIT: here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYb5xSd4PRs
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:53 AM
0

Shaming is non-issue. If someone is affected by shaming that probably means that they themselves are not comfortable with what they are doing. That mixed with a really weak character. There are no laws against being a slut. And there are no laws against being a player. Where is the problem here? Some granny does not like what you are doing? Or your potential girlfriend/boyfriend will not be interested in you as much if you turned into a slut? Do MRAs concern themselves with such girlish issues t…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:17 AM
2

A case of "hamster on drugs" in action.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:42 PM
1

Very nice find. Still reading. But what is "the journal of new male studies"? First time I heard of one.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:34 PM
7

Well since no one yet posted. Here goes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA This has become, I think, the default video on male disposability.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:58 AM
1

Maybe you can elaborate on why and how you managed to get 80% + the house?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:46 AM
1

I seem to be the only one to like this :) Good stuff.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 09:26 PM
-2

Sounds very true to me, I agree. In fact I've come to the same conclusion after several relationships with different girls. Some of them just don't want to understand certain things. It can even be dragged one step further: do you fancy evolutionary psychology? If so, here is a possibility: women who are ignorant about male sexuality have an evolutionary "advantage". They get raped more, for sure, but those who were raped (in the past) had more babies. So evolution favors females who are being r…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:23 PM
1

This is so close to "Agenda 21" it's not even funny.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:04 PM
2

If they are superior how did they get themselves so oppressed in the first place?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:32 PM
3

From what I've heard prenups "stop working" once there are children in question. Once there was a story about a man, who invested his earned money into real estate and other stuff. And the best part - he made his mother the owner of all of that. So if you have a good relationship with your mother or somebody else - sign some valuables on their name.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:26 AM
13

Apparently they even have women-only TRAINS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaD3kHc1Gh8 And looks like they are far from being alone in that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-only_passenger_car
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:04 PM
2

No problem, I do hope you will enjoy the book. It was written by a woman, but she is very harsh towards her gender and often goes to the extreme. If you are a woman (judging from the screen name here) then I can imagine that it might be a little hard reading the book. Just keep in mind that it was written 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:25 PM
26

Except that there are good reasons why children put everything in their mouths. Yes it often contains germs, but they are beneficial for building a strong immune system. Forbid your kid from adapting to his environment and he is more likely to have all kinds of allergies later on. SHARE this with a Mum.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:40 PM
28

Previously it's been my aunt, who decided buying me a copy of "The End Of Men" was a good idea. Buy your aunt a copy of "The Manipulated Man". Would be a great response too.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:19 PM
3

It got rightfully deleted. Feminism is not for equality. Look it up on if you insist. Here is the definition from wikipedia: "Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women." Cheers.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:10 PM
2

If you are going to go through with it, consider adding Doris Lessing: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/aug/14/edinburghfestival2001.edinburghbookfestival2001 Not only was she given a Nobel prize, but she is also a woman and many feminists regarded her as one of them for a long time.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:15 PM
1

Egalitarian classes? Look for something called "ethics and morality". Must be there.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:33 PM
2

I think there is conflict for the same reason we see conflict between religion and science in some areas. The world views of MRA and feminism are radically different.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 11:25 AM
2

http://www.jmooneyham.com/your-true-chances-of-getting-rich.html This is probably personal research of the author, but it has some interesting points relevant to your discussion.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:33 PM
–

My native is Lithuanian. We have genders for inanimate objects as well. Never heard of anyone attacking the syntax or trying to change the original "gender" implied by the syntax. Might be just a case for the English speaking part of the world. Another peculiar thing that I noticed only in English is unability to distinguish between formal you and informal you. (It used to have thou/thee some, but I never head anyone use that).
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:43 PM
–

It's /r/relationships. Dominated by teenage girls. You go there for your own misery...
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:45 PM
15

Damn, I failed at English again :) I will leave it there for amusement. Thanx. Basically wanted to demonstrate something as silly as the statement in the picture, but picked the worst possible example.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:47 AM
3

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. Straight from wikipedia. So feminism: defines what is equality, establishes it and fights for keeping it. And does this only for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:40 AM
–

Sheer nonsense. Hero - is an exceptional person, typically a man, distinguished by his actions and accomplishments. Same thing.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:31 AM
–

That idea has been explored a bit before as well. Really? Maybe you know whos idea this was? I wonder if it came from within the feminism or just some random poster on the internet, like myself.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:59 AM
–

Wait wait wait. I am having an moment of Eureka here. So some feminists say that the idea that men can't get raped comes from patriarchy. The idea that women should get custody and alimony comes from patriarchy. The idea that men should not hit women comes from patriarchy. Well a good bunch of feminists seem to support all those ideas with agendas, law propositions and shelters dedicated just for women. So what logically would follow in that case is: Feminism is patriarchy. And like everyone tha…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:07 AM
-3

I don't get people upvoting/downwoting the rightsbot. Also I don't get people downvoting those who reply to rights bot. It seems people like their buttons..
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:18 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/QLvXz.gif
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:13 PM
–

To anyone who reads the comments before opening those pictures: Please save your innocence and don't even look. You will regret it !
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:36 PM
–

I would like another source as well.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:51 PM
18

It's just like in the movies. Faith in humanity: unchanged.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:38 PM
–

Might be related to female hormones being used in the production of certain foods. Speculative, but...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:13 PM
–

What I don't get from this add is what is there for women to be upset about when her man buys a car?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:28 PM
1

I really don't know why this is. Pick any evolutionary psychology book or even a single article and you will have one theory about why this is. I used to wonder too, but after that it just clicked and stayed. Suddenly everything made sense.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:34 PM
–

Maybe you could give link to those comments instead of just the picture?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:10 AM
–

My insecurities, My anger, Me, Me, Me. This is why I need feminism!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:54 PM
–

Men aren't some big mass group whose achievements are all your achievements by virtue of being male. Also women are not some big mass group whose sufferings are shared by all women by a virtue of being one. So everything you are brining up from the past is irrelevant by your own argument.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:31 AM
–

Personally I think there are a lot of misconceptions with "most of the feminists" "most of the MRA". It usually breaks down to "people I have met" or "people I know". To me feminism is defined by the kind of studies they have, the kind of books and articles they publish and the kind of laws they favour. This is feminism. Everything else is just a periphery. So personally I do not see a lot of similarities between the groups.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:19 AM
1

Also, I hate to be that guy, but it's "lose," not "loose." Thanks, I am not an English speaker, there are a set of words I constantly mess up. As for the rest of your comment - If they already corrected costs for women in health insurance then they should at least be consistent with this stuff, I agree. But on the whole I would strongly disagree since it's government regulation on top of non-issue.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:23 AM
–

Being a victim attracts attention. This is actually one of the symptoms of people with histrionic personality disorders. They are known to fake illnesses and accidents to get some attention.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:03 PM
–

Yes although I knew our female HR wanted to staff office jobs with women she also only wanted to staff warehouses with men. Hmmm. What kind of fetish does she have. Interesting place you are working at :)
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:36 PM
–

I wish they would go all women all the way and only do business with other all-women organizations, get electricity from only women-only plants and all that. For now they are just openly displaying their hate. If no one could see them doing that there would be no effect. I would bet they make sure everyone around them knows where they work. Or maybe they have some terrible past experiences with men? I would understand that. Anyway - they probably have the right to do what they do. But good story…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:05 PM
-1

Well as much as I don't like the law - I am happy that there are people who would benefit from it :) But on the other side I remember all the families that will have to face increased life insurance. I don't know hot to react. It is a win for men. But it does not sound like it is a just or a moral win.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:36 PM
–

Running individual tests for each applicant is costly. Who would you think pay for that? Applicants themselves and no one else. Stereotypes are good. If someone does not like that they can freely choose different insurance company. Or start their own. (If someone thought individual test would be a good idea - they would have already done that and swept away the competition).
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:17 PM
–

Well. Realistically people with life insurance usually have families. So they loose no matter what. Life insurance for MGTOW? Who are they planning to leave their money for? I don't think they even need life insurance. If you go into men vs women mode then yes, it's a win for men. To me it's non-issue being made into an issue. Like wage gap. There are probably a lot of factors that lead men to higher prices besides discrimination. Like men usually are the ones that start doing crazy shit, games …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:08 PM
–

Everyone looses except insurance companies.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:58 PM
–

Even rapists wear condoms these days? How kind of them.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:27 PM
2

A very good list. However I think it would have made a better impact if posted as a stand-alone comment rather than a response.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:39 PM
–

We have the right to free speech as well. Even if our free speech is bashing feminism. This surely has nothing to do with being against free speech.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:18 PM
2

Very Nice. +1
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:16 AM
1

You are going away because of the 3 things that you disagree with? I disagree with like 75% of MRA views. All the "social constructs of gender", "social pressures" and "bad looks in the park when around kids", "Portraying of men in media", "Fighting over definitions of rape and mutilation". Keep in mind that this subreddit is made of a quite wide range of age groups. And people in the far left of age distribution are the most vocal sometimes, because they have highest amounts of free time.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:54 AM
1

Courts get paid based on the percentage of cases in which they award child support, and the amount of child support awarded. Do You know if this is true outside USA as well? Does this suggest that when a women is the richer among the two - the man has higher chances of getting custody?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:07 AM
4

1) At what age does impotency start to be a potential problem among your clients/patients? 2) Is testosterone replacement only related to restoring erection or are there any other potential benefits/consequences as a side effect? 3) (might be weird) - Do you ever encounter women, wives/girlfriends in particular, who try to control the sexual health of their partners? Like trying to restrain them from getting a vasectomy or push them to get testosterone treatment?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:04 AM
–

I think this would be a better fit for something like /r/picturesofretards
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:53 AM
–

OK I will play the definition game with you. I enter "rape" in wikipedia for a definition. "Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse, which is initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority or with a person who is incapable of valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, or below the legal age of consent". Then I can say that the situati…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:19 PM
–

Do you reach out for this "exactitude" everywhere, or just on the topic of the definition of rape? I, for example, see people compared to Hitler or Stalin almost daily. Those should keep MRA quite busy if they would want to see analogies as an issue and apply consistency. Why should someone pick up on this blogger for a use of a word she felt was appropriate to describe the situation? And furthermore it has many similarities to rape. No consent, force, drugs, intimate parts of the body.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:54 PM
–

You want to play the game of definitions? I can kindly remind you that male on male rape can be viewed as not really a rape according to the real hardcore definition of rape because no-one can get pregnant by that.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:41 PM
–

I have no problem calling this "rape" to stress the importance. If you do - you can protest, I guess. What would you win by that?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:35 PM
1

A pregnant woman is carrying a child of some man. Therefore any misconduct to her or the baby also affects the man. To me - any genuine injustice that women face while they are with a man is also an issue of men.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:14 PM
–

Doctors don't get severe punishments for medical misconducts and there are several reasons for that. Most important being that not just anyone can replace a doctor and there might be a shortage of them. So any doctor is better than no doctor. Hardly anything good ever would come from your mother suing that doctor.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:38 PM
–

If we can add "genital mutilation" on circumcision to draw more attention to the serious issue. Then women can add "rape" to something as awful as this.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:13 PM
–

To me this does sound more serious then "drunk-rape". I agree that this is a women's issue. (not kidding)
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:56 PM
–

Agreed. Again. I haven't yet found a single point you made that I would disagree with. Chicks dig uniforms. Everyone dig uniforms. When I was a visiting student in a research based hospital in Toronto - I've been given a bag with a sign of a hospital. I carried that bag back to my country and had it on the plane. One of the plane attendants saw my bag and started calling me "Mr. Doctor", started to offer me seats in the front of the plane. I had to defend myself by repeating that I am an analyst…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:59 PM
–

My first thought was: sampling bias. If you will only survey your friends - then you won't be able to generalize your results to the entire population. For example all of your FB friends might be friends with you only because you like/dislike feminism. Also all of them are from the similar age group, live nearby, similar class, etc. But probably you don't want to generalize and are only interested in the population of your friends. Another thought is that facebook is usually not taken seriously …
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:13 AM
1

Majority of them are probably below 16. Leave them be.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:52 AM
1

Let's leave the question of who is a "drama queen" here for anyone who might read this. Take care.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:01 PM
–

Thanks for long response. I've found a very good piece of video that explains my position better. Here is about how much you can influence a child: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6EnZOwG4p1o#t=1009s Here is about toy preference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KQ2xrnyH2wQ#t=1055s And here is about differences between children other than penises and vaginas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KQ2xrnyH2wQ#t=1337s To my cur…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:47 AM
–

It seems that I picked some hostility from posting in that thread. OK. If there were some biological difference between girls' and boys' choice of toys, what would be the point of testing children's knowledge of these differences? The point? I am not the teacher, I honestly don't know. And a question for you: Do you think a test like this can alter a child's personality in some drastic way?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:18 AM
–

simple think to try is to type "smoking inheritance" and search. Here is one example: http://www.springerlink.com/content/uw01034u256w5718/ Majority of such research was done on separated twins or observing adopted babies and comparing them with non-adopted ones. About your personal example I can put it in a very different light: what research says smoking is a social influence? Everyone in your family seemed to smoke and your mother even had a tobacco company and you still did not pick that hab…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:15 AM
1

I don't believe gender is just a social construct. I believe majority of stereotypes to be just. I think MRA has more important issues than "the pressure of stereotypes" to overcome. And I am here because of them. There are many MRAs I don't agree with. You are probably one of them. Also: Downvoting every reply I give? Insults in every sentence you post? I honestly think MRA would do better with less of you around.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:44 AM
–

Man, come on :) I was trying to say that there is nothing really to move forward here. As far as I see we have limited options: 1) Start getting butt-hurt whenever a man is portrayed as a criminal 2) Try to censor TV and adds 3) Let it go. Throughout all the films main villains always were male. Same for all the main heroes by the way. Just like in this add - rapists are men, policemen are men, security workers are men. That was my point. I got dragged into the discussion about feeling of securi…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:45 AM
–

In a sense, yes. Men are looking for women who make them feel safe emotionally, and personally. I agree. Also men want fidelity. That is another type of security. But these types of safety are not related to the context of the security adds the OP posted. I was trying to refer to safety as physical safety. Hope it will be clearer now.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:33 AM
–

Can you elaborate a little? Are you saying that men are looking for women who can protect them just as much as women do?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:21 AM
–

Why is it natural that women always feel more insecure? This, I think without being an ass about it, is self evident. Anecdotally you can for example google "what women look for in a man" and you are very likely to find "feeling safe" somewhere in there. but I hope you or someone understands why I think this is misandric.... I think I know why. I am not attacking you for posting them here. But imagine you are the one making adds to sell these security devices. I think they did their research and…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:14 AM
2

Don't shame the sex shamers :)
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:48 AM
–

Well. Actually in all cases both the security phone worker was a man and a police officer was a man as well. Personally I see no problem here. Home security adds are probably directed at women since they naturally always feel more insecure.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:46 AM
–

Well the accuser was a little girl. That takes away half of the surprise for me. I feel sorry for the true victims here. It's strange that 7 year olds can't vote and be responsible for their actions but their words count as evidence to imprison 4 other women.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:35 AM
1

He just said it without the reference to any study. Am I right?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:27 AM
1

Do you believe rape is about power and not about sexual lust?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 10:14 PM
4

This is probably just some marketing at work making the film watchable by women. Many great things get worse and worse with subsequent editions. Movies, books, games, songs. They are kicking money out of their brand-sign as long as it gives profit in return. My reaction would be to simply forget about it. It's not your film. Stop watching later editions. Being upset because someone made their character more feminine is similar to being offended by a character with big boobs in an anime game. Is …
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:38 PM
-1

What I am saying is that I don't believe there is such thing as "gender construct". Much the same as there is "patriarchy". That does not make me an asshole, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:54 PM
–

Fair point. What I am getting at is that it is a little weird for me to see MRA opposing feminist and at the same time in parallel buying into all the pseudo-science it spreads. If asked I would bet half the community would say that gender is a social-construct. This is feminism, not against feminism. On reflection I would say that this is my main concern.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:39 PM
–

There's nothing about having a penis that necessitates liking match box cars and not barbies; conversely there's nothing about having a vagina that necessitates a girl liking cooking and not liking war video games. I didn't say anything about penises and vaginas. If you are saying that genitals are the only part in which men and women differ then we disagree. Exercises like these create and reinforce the idea that possession of a penis is necessary for liking certain things and a vagina is neces…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:23 AM
–

I disagree for a few reasons. First being that a tiny test is not "reinforcing" to submit to stereotypes. This in my opinion is an over-reaction by MRA. Also if kids play at school together they are already pretty aware of boy-games and girl-games and how they are divided. And if there will be some boys who like dolls - they are already "pressured". Basically in my opinion all this "pressure" idea is highly overrated. If someone is thinking that by giving some silly test he can shape a child per…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:19 AM
–

If You are not aware of the evidence - that does not mean there aren't any.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:13 AM
–

They have less influence than you might think. Same argument.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:12 AM
–

Yup. I watched the picture again. This time zoomed in. If the line on the bottom was written by a teacher then it is close to a kind of indoctrination. But I still think that a tiny test like this will not have any influence on what kind of toys a particular kid will choose.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:58 AM
–

Yes and I agree with you on that. There are many neutral toys. And also there are boys that want to play dolls and girls that want to play with robots. Also probably most of those boys play "rip this doll's head out" and girls play robot-family. But I would say that this is going into details a little too much. What I am for is letting the kid choose. But what I am against is pushing children to choose toys that they might not like as much. Or to try to hide certain information from them by bann…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:32 AM
–

And I think that it is NOT largely a social construct. Even IQ, smoking and character are mainly influenced by genetics, not social constructs (according to research). On one hand someone might not want to reinforce something, to let those girls that want to play with robots be able to do it and boy that want to play house - also be able to do it. But on the other hand we might also want our kids to learn something about gender differences. I see nothing tragic about that.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:18 AM
–

Completely agree. There are many articles (scientific and not) saying that toy preferences for young children are somewhat inherited. Also you can ask any parent who has both boys and girls and they will say that toy preference is inherited. The confusion often only comes from people that have no children and those feminists who hate reality and wish they were living in their fantasy lands. People pushing boys to play with barbies or girls to play with trucks might not be having the best interes…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:43 AM
–

I see. Do we (MRA) think that toy preference is only a social construct?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:30 AM
–

What exactly is encouraged here?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:26 AM
3

I am not new. I just wanted to start some kind of a discussion.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:40 PM
–

I don't like labels to begin with, but if I had to go with one I'd say I'm egalitarian. I don't even like the term "egalitarian". All I can think of saying on this topic is "I am for this and I am against that, now if you care - please invent a label for it".
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:23 PM
–

This objectification and men being stimulated visually thing is hard to explain to any single woman let alone a feminist. Just think about the "clothing has nothing to do with rape" ideas. Which to me is a little sad. I wonder if there are similar things that men don't understand or refuse to understand about women. Also men seem to be complaining about the situation they are in more so than women. (I consider this video to be of a complaining nature). Any ideas if we can do anything else beside…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:16 PM
4

Hey you can always go eat some place else (eq of purchasing a different game).
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:37 PM
1

Voting system is not perfect. If you want to stay informed you have to think past voting system and do some digging on your own, regardless what is popular at the moment.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:33 PM
0

While this is possibly true, it does not change the logic behind my argument. If it is possible for men to have children with young women/girls - how can it be a mental disorder? In fact nature selects for it. As men grow older they become attracted to younger and younger girls. Same for women. This is because old sperm/egg need younger counterpart to have higher chances of healthy offspring. And the opposite is sometimes true as well - younger people want sex with someone older. The question is…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:15 PM
–

Girls are capable of having children once they have their first period. The social construct saying that it is only normal to have sexual-acts beyond certain age is just that. If we were to change this age to say 24 - would sexual attraction to 20 year olds become a mental condition?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:03 PM
1

Mental disorder is a quite fluid term. One needs to remember that back in the day black enslaved people were said to have a mental disorder for not obeying their masters. The cure was - corporal punishment. Wiki source Also lobotomies. Never forget those as well. Accepted as medical practice in the entire world. Wiki source Even if mildly related to mens rights - the importance of fighting these thing is titanic. Since this is (as I have heard) third rejection in a row, there is a possibility so…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:00 PM
–

He wants to let girls hit him - good for him. Interesting fetish. Does not mean everyone should follow.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:47 PM
5

No better way to hide the kind of customers your product attracts then to take away they right to free speech.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:37 PM
3

Can You elaborate why these are offensive to anyone?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:00 PM
-1

It's just sex. Unless he is mentally ill.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:52 PM
0

I stopped taking Wiki seriously when I found feminist signatures on articles about evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:46 PM
5

This subreddit is for MensRights. I believe egalitarians have their separate spaces. The issues of women are not really discussed here. However I don't think there is a greater sub representing the issues that men face today than this one. In my opinion this might be a good place for you to lurk, indulge in conversations and hear this side of the fence. But not a good place to promote feminism. As this thread grows older you will get many more different replies.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:15 AM
1

I know that many women who have gone through similar situations describe the giving in as a self preservation thing. Kind of like its mentally easier for them at the time to give in than it is to push the person off of you over and over again and to deal with their reaction. And in another thread another feminists are probably talking about how women are not seen as assertive or capable to stand for themselves. And blame men for this "double standard". Don't you see the irony?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:04 AM
1

That guy was not raped. This is a far cry from rape. Of course more feminine visitors of MensRights will probably think otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:53 AM
1

I read that with this melody in mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pSYRLZj8xs
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:42 AM
1

We have a lot of emigration to UK and Ireland as it is :) I don't agree with over-privatization as well (like private prisons and forced health insurance from private companies like they have in U.S.A.) Those just seem to be weird for me. But Europe is probably going the same path... One such thing I can find is forced car insurance and there are no government insurance agencies.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:20 PM
–

Healthcare is very expensive. Imagine you have a condition for which you need a prescription of medicine on a regular basis. Perhaps even for the rest of your life. This would cost hundreds of whatever currency every time. Maybe even thousands. Most people can't afford it. Even basic surgery can cost in the hundreds of thousands. Most people don't have that kind of money lying around. They don't have money because they pay taxes for everything they do not need. Sure when their time comes - they …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:06 PM
–

Because it's a tax on healthy people.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:31 PM
–

I would disagree with this. There are several work-arounds in my opinion. 1) and the best in my opinion - Ask for clear consent before doing anything like that. 2) offer money to participants - you would get lines of them I believe. 3) if medical students think it's not big deal - why can't they simply learn on each other? Further I would say that it preselects medical students in some wicked sense. What I have in mind here is that those students who disagree to participate in such a practice wo…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:06 AM
1

To me it looks like just a by-product of growing. This phase transition is known as "regression toward the mediocrity". Many subreddits are fighting with it. So you have reddit then /r/trueReddit then /r/trueTrueReddit. /r/depthHub and etc. The key point for me is not to give up to the reasoning of the crowd, stay true to yourself and expose flaws in logic once you see them.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:53 AM
–

I don't know about birth-rape, but there are some medical practices which can be considered "rape". As a medical insider, can you comment on this?: http://patientmodesty.org/nonconsensualexams.aspx Is this general practice and is it justifiable?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:23 PM
–

BUT!: Here
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:09 PM
8

So you are implying that they can't give consent once they are horny. All men are rapists. (hope the sarcasm is obvious)
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:34 PM
-6

I really want to add the angle of evo-psych here for some reason. In it there are two things that drive such behaviour: sexual conflict and paternity uncertainty. So the argument is like this: Father should always be sceptical about him being a father and so it is in the mothers interest to prove that the baby is indeed his. She does that by pointing out to as many similarities between the baby and the father as she can find. And if she can't find them - she tries to make them.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:27 PM
–

To me racism is discrimination with no reason. If there is a reason (like: black people hypothetically are worse drivers) then it's not racism. It would be reality.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:59 PM
3

Nice post. I would like to add that many people who consider censorship of the internet don't acknowledge to themselves the the internet is simply a reflection of human culture. If there are child-pornography on the internet, that means something is doing it and uploading it. Censoring it won't make that stuff go away. Plus after SOPA and PIPA and the like I am inclined to believe that there are "higher" pressures pushing for control of the internet.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:39 AM
2

Forced insurance is another issue. Yet it's probably even a bigger issue than equal prices. So I agree with You. But I think in the end it will hurt women. Just like equal health insurance might hurt men (if women were the ones who visit doctors more frequently or have more medical issues).
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:32 AM
–

Yes, but nothing has to be fair. If the insurance companies are inflating the price for men then I think they have a reason beyond being sexist to men. And they generalize in many ways already. Drivers that have more experience pay less. That is not fair for those who have a talent. And it is not fair for those who drive every day, why should they wait a few years... I don't think "generalization" is an argument here. Plus it is not fair to women. If companies are forced to offer the service for…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:27 AM
–

That maybe on average men are more likely to get in an accident.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:16 AM
–

Nothing is free. By having it "free" you are forcing everyone to pay for your contraception. Including people who can't even have children.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:02 AM
–

I am from Europe. I am a man. I support MensRights. And I am against this law. This is in the neighbourhood of pay gap. There are additional factors that needs to be considered.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:56 AM
3

So many logical mistakes. The one that stood out was "Government treats all people the same, but not all behaviours the same, so same-sex marriages can be banned"... Let's see where we can get with that argument. We can ban pregnancy and still treat all people the same, we can ban wearing skirts, we can ban having long hair. Does not mean it will be all right! And it does not even mean all people will be treated the same.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:37 AM
–

Being on knees is a sign of submission and there are many people (mostly men probably) who like it because of this single reason. The "caveman" part just shows what level of employees Cosmo can afford to hire.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:06 AM
–

Seems that the link is dead. "Apologies, but no results were found for the requested archive. Perhaps searching will help find a related post." Anyway, females like serial killers. Many of them receive lot's of love letters and visitors once in jail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:04 AM
–

what is human race compared to TRUE EQUALITY?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:03 AM
2

strongly agree.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:39 PM
–

Weird but the article sounds like it praises the infidelity as a area where women should "catch up". Women can now use their power in ways to which men have long been accustomed. Whatever. Isn't infidelity immoral? Weren't men labelled pigs for that? I am looking forward to the news where women brag about getting in jail as often as men.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:26 AM
25

Rape? - Only MEN can stop RAPE! Alimony? - MAN UP for the kids! Job? - Privileged by PATRIARCHY^(tm) Domestic violence? - No women can do any real harm to a MAN Rights to his own children? - Just a father...
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:29 AM
3

To me the real issue here is hurting animals.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:13 AM
3

I think it's not just biology vs society. One has to understand that society is a part of biology. It is kind of a next step in evolution. Genetic lines that started to cooperate at some point probably had a much better chance to survive. That's why talk about society that is not rooted in biological needs of individual agents lack context. Looking through this prism the question would become: is it possible to erase the observed behaviour by changing society? If no - it's hard-wired. If yes - t…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:10 AM
4

It's been shown time and time again that the most important factor in bringing a nation from impoverished to developing is educating the females. Had a quick glimpse. Looks like none of them showed anything about "most important factor".
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:21 AM
1

I see. Well I guess it's good we live where laws are in our liking :)
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:18 AM
–

Can you provide sources for that "time and time again" showing?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:12 AM
–

OP of that question is a man with a woman's avatar.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:01 AM
1

What if you didn't ask for it? What if you woke up and it had been done to you? Then it's rape. In my country is not illegal to have sex with drunken person. So there is a difference. Re the killing a drunk person - it would be a crime because killing is a crime regardless if someone asks or not. Having sex is not a crime when someone asks. So here is the difference between these.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:46 AM
–

So, if you are really drunk at a bar and wake up the next morning with a sore butthole in some stranger's bed, that's not possible rape? That's just your fault for being too drunk? If I got drunk and then started asking strangers to do me it the butthole - then of course it is my fault. It is not illegal to be drunk in a bar. It is also not illegal to have sex with someone who is asking for it.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:32 AM
–

To me it still seems to take the blame away from the one who is doing the silliest thing and who is the most guilty. Being the person who knows he is not in control of himself when he is drunk but decides to get drunk anyway. I personally would say that the responsibility is solely with the person who is drinking, not everyone else around him.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:15 PM
1

MR has so much momentum behind it? In that paragraph I was talking about Global Warming. It has big momentum. MR has almost no momentum. That's why I picked this fight. (Regarding your statement about fights worth picking). Your rejection of literature means that we won't be able to establish a philosophic base for what I'm trying to say are more dire issues. If someone comes to me talking/asking about MR issues - I don't reply with "go read literature" because... you know. I want movement to gr…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:17 PM
1

shows to me someone who doesn't understand how to pick their fights in terms of what (at least I consider) is actually important for humanity. I mean is it called "environmental right" ? This is beyond any definition of what "a right" is. At least in my understanding of the word. And today is a first day I hear such a concept. After reading the definition it seems to be yet another anti global-warming idea, only labelled differently to appeal to human rights via some turns and twists. Ok, but no…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:47 PM
–

Good response, I upvote You. The way males and females react to rape might be very different and probably is. I just disagree with that drinking statement you made. It seems to me that you are suggesting that women should be excused of responsibility when they are drinking. Of course I am not talking about black-out drunk. But if a women is somewhat-drunk and makes advances - why men should change their attitudes, why not have sex with that women? Furthermore, if we would live by that, it would …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:05 PM
1

environmental rights ??? egalitarianism, ect, are more important far more important to me than MR could ever be Egalitarians do not exist. Or at least I never saw them. How could one be egalitarian and what does it mean? When black people were subjected to slavery you didn't have race-equality groups. You had anti-racism. Same situation with feminism (which you don't buy, I know). You want equality - you fight the ones advocating for inequality. The race-equivalent egalitarian stance would proba…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:49 PM
1

Not sure if relevant but I sense a double standard here. One cannot hope that females will start having kids with poor homeless people. However from the other side they are marching for men to mate with "sluts".
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:48 AM
–

Props for considering evolutionary psychology. In my sad experience majority of MRAs here reject it and argue for feminst-sociological point of view on human nature.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:05 AM
4

I'm sick of these "let's not do X because it's making us look bad" posts. Me too. I am waiting for "Not accepting patriarchy is making us look bad" any day now.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:57 AM
2

Engineer = +10 Scientist = -15 :D They just sorted all the professions by income. So now there are 2 columns for income.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:50 AM
–

I would encourage that single father to work towards getting custody of his children. That's what men's rights should be about... They are doing just that. By fighting the main obstacle - feminism.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:08 AM
8

agree agree agree
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:53 AM
–

She wants to hold a conversation with feminists ? Hehe. OK. Would be fun to see what that turns to. But I would like to say that by selecting just those feminists who agree to answer her quiz she will be getting a biased sample of the whole feminist population.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:02 PM
–

What are divorce laws like in Lithuania? Never went through a divorce. They don't make the news much. So I can't really know. I remember one case when a famous basketball player was going through a divorce. He lost his house and two luxury cars and were left with a flat and his old car. Also some million $ did go to women. I think the laws are as bad as in any other country. 90%~ of cases children are left with the mother. If father gets the children "they were taken away from her!" If mother ge…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:21 AM
–

Nah. I live in Lithuania. We had a talk already, I remember your username. You live in Canada, right? I spend half of each of my summers in Toronto almost every year. How are men treated there? Never paid attention to that. I know they had a TV-show there were guys had to pick-up girls from clubs for money. If that is not banned yet then I guess not all is lost?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:04 AM
–

this is one of English words that I constantly mess-up. Edited.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:59 AM
–

To be fair to you - the conversation with brother was from another day (not today). But since it happened this week - I included it here as well. Thanks for getting so active in such a short time.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:56 AM
–

So I tried to take your challenge today, even thou I don't know any feminists or people who consider "gender issues" seriously in any form. First I talked with my Girlfriend. Started talking about feminism. She said women were oppressed in the past etc. She said they are being paid less. I said that I don't believe that is the case. She believed me. Then I told her about some cases that I've read about on this subreddit (like paying child-suport after DNA test proves you are not the father, etc)…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:41 AM
–

Victim Blaming.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:35 AM
–

I think /r/masculism was created by some lady from "2XChroms" because she wanted to have a mens-right's reddit without "all the misogyny of /r/mensrights/. Let me see if I can find the proof of that. I've only found this: http://metareddit.com/r/communityplans But I can clearly remember reading a comment of a feminist saying she will create /r/masculism. Anyway I will post it here if I find it. For now just consider the fact that /r/feminism and all other female-driven reddits direct to /r/mascu…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:15 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ2xrnyH2wQ Here is a good documentary to show to your friend (if she is willing). If she is unwilling to go into that direction then you can just disagree. Or respond with something along the same lines "Sigh. None of the feminists get it". Also I would try to push her towards self-reflection. Did she got all her views about gender from her feminist-indoctrinated studies or did she had any personal experience where she felt she had their rights suspended to benef…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:56 PM
2

The short answer would probably be that we might (not) like what he was doing, but we should defend his right to do it without making it personal.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:13 PM
–

I may not agree, but I respect her opinion. I believe parents should decide on how they raise their children, rather than the public at large.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:45 PM
–

barbarosaaaa is my favourite and also the one who is responsible for me turning to MRM
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:40 PM
0

"We have to assume all men are rapists to protect ourself. It's unfair, but it's necessary." How would that assumption work for anyone? After this assumption - did she change her behaviour in any way? If your friend is talking like that and still hangs out in public alongside men - she is only paying lip service.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:09 AM
–

Well the only different between LadyBoners and CreepShots was the consent? As far as I heard You don't need consent to take a picture of someone in public (CreepShots even said to have the links to the specific laws about this). If that is the case then it seems to me that it is really irrelevant to compare the two on these grounds.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:41 AM
–

Me too. When I see something I disagree with - I don't take it personally. I can still appreciate his talent and the work that he does without the need to agree with it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:16 AM
–

Only reason CreepShots was taken down is because of SRS jealousy. They got jealous after the fast realization that no-one would ever want to creep-shot them. Logically this has got to be the reason. Otherwise they would attack LadyBoners and all the rest.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:42 PM
1

Personal opinion: That's just a very loaded over-generalization. Here is what I believe to be true: Men want more sex and more sexual partners than women; Men need less love and feelings to be able to engage in sex; Men rape women far more often than women rape men. But to say that they are NO MORE THAN walking penises is similar to saying that women are just crying, and lying baby-machines. I don't believe that the fact that rapists can't hold themselves says anything about men in general. For …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:07 PM
2

Well my interpretation of it is that new-wave feminists should be seen as misogynists by vanilla (traditional) feminists, because they "defend the right" to be objectified sexually.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:56 PM
–

This is plain wrong. Feminist-driven propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:47 PM
–

Also if their view is different from yours does not mean its wrong (or stupid). Could be the other way around.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:36 PM
1

Oh and just in case I did not sound friendly - I am. I hope this was just a battle of ideas/believes. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:47 PM
1

Ok let me step back for us. 1) You totally missed one quotation: "Discriminant function analysis was used to develop a set of variables that significantly identified victimization status. The variables found to be related to women's being sexually victimized were (a) number of different lifetime sexual partners, (b) provocative dress, and (c) alcohol use." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9519576 Which says quite clearly what variables were significant. Among them - provocative dress. 2) You d…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:39 PM
1

Are you in denial? You cite me every thing that I've read in /r/feminism on these matters. These are fairy-tails that they believe in, just like patriarchy. Those are not peer-reviewed publications. Here are a list of studies supporting my claim: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10575972 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9519576 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00304.x/abstract http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_S…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:56 PM
1

Evo psych theory is not evidence and I never said that. I said that evidence favour evo-psych more that it does feministic theory (which you say have a stronger basis of evidence). If you think feminism with "patriarchy" and "rape culture" is more scientific than evo-psych then we have vastly different opinions on the matter. I'd want to see at least a correlation between clothes, climate and rape, but there isn't one for me to see. Correlation of climate, clothes and rape is missing the point. …
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:25 PM
–

That's feminist research that defines rape as sex while intoxicated. Nope. That one came from evo-psych. So we need to stay out of the debate as well as participate, not very consistent are you? I was talking about levels of involvement. So 1st would be agreeing. 2nd would be staying away. 3rd would be disagreeing. I just said that we should probably do more than just staying away. It is not inconsistent. Do you feel its really important to tell people that that have life crippling PTSD from bei…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:36 PM
–

Not all rapists have PD. There are research showing that 75% of males admit that they would rape in certain situations. Also there is a lot of rape among animals. I would not label something a disorder if it is natural and wide spread. There is also no know trend of rape and geographic locations, seasons and clothes, so the idea that rapists chose on the basis of clothing is likely bs There should not be any trends in geographic locations, because fertile females live everywhere. Same is true wi…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:05 PM
–

Sorry, but I totally disagree with You. While it is true that if a "hot" woman is surrounded by friends - she is safer. But imagine you are in a club. And some provocatively dressed girl shows up. And after 5 minutes she is gone. Will anyone go to try to look for her? I would say no - they would assume she is in some corner making out. Also there are studies indicating that the likelihood for a women to get pregnant after rape is higher that getting pregnant after consensual sex. http://www.poli…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:46 PM
–

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiological_theories_of_rape#Preventing_rape Here is one example. And I support it.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:16 PM
–

There were actually some comments in that article saying that the guy needed "lessons on how to be the father". All of those comments were written by a women.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:57 PM
1

I like those Backlash! essays a lot. Great quotations, always in style. Yet short and to the point. Whoever is writing it - well done. You have my recognition (if anonymous recognitions mean anything).
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:55 PM
2

Or, dunno.. maybe Ethics? Or Moral philosophy. Wait. These things totally already exist. No need to reinvent.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:44 PM
1

Peoples rights? Sounds like nonsense. Depending on the contexts it probably should be one of the following: law, ethics, moral philosophy. There are subreddits for those already.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:03 AM
–

Introversion is normal and healthy.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:56 AM
4

Strangely enough, most women in the comments say those are awful advices... while a guy opposes them and agrees with the article. Wut? It's not strange. I've seen many men going for "Don't tell her, you will only make her feel bad and it would be selfish" nonsense. I do not know where they get that stuff, probably in their special needs classes on morality. Men can be dicks too. And women can be moral. This is a good example.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:53 AM
2

The all not consenting to the video thing just shows how her students saw her - as a play thing and her opinion being irrelevant. Guys were banging their teacher, probably were bragging about it to all the schools in state and wanted a video as an evidence. She was either very naive or wanted to get famous/have fun. But I don't think she deserved prison. U.S.A. seem to want to put everyone in a prison. Everyone living there should have a problem with that... It might be related to the existence …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:57 PM
1

True. But: OP said he is working in advocating and educating about inequalities. And my assumption: Since his boss told him to read about patriarchy - so I assumed this was the next thing he will be educating people about. Of course I am not sure if it was correct and might be quite a stretch.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:49 PM
6

MRA activist working for a feminist boss and silently accepting her ideas because he is afraid to loose his job. Oh and his job is about inequalities. So his job, after the "patriarchy" indoctrination, will be - spreading feminism!. Thats quite a character.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:39 PM
1

"I was hoping MR could help be critique it" Wrong approach. Sounds like "I don't like it - help me get rid of it". You should ask to check the facts or maybe tell you IF it's wrong or not, but not to find a point that can be critiqued. Now you are coming from an already biased position. And there is a big difference in my opinion.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:31 PM
–

I think only a very low percentage of women actually experience rape in their lifetime. So it leaves a lot of females out of all the action. And so they want to stretch the definitions wide to include as much of them as possible. By having broad definition of rape you can give certain benefits to more women. They muddy water for a few of course, but on the other hand get more place in that same water for others. So they care about women. They probably just don't care about rape that much.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:40 PM
4

To me it just looks like a few lazy girls looking for their daily dose of drama.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:09 AM
–

I am from Lithuania and this is also true here. Both Men and Women ages are being made 68. Women age is being increased faster and they will catch up at about 2026. I believe these are EU standards or something.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:10 PM
–

I, for one, liked the reading. Why people here want to ban him? He didn't say this was his opinion. He merely posted something that he found.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:56 PM
-1

I would say most hated group would be Muslims.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:43 AM
–

I will post my thought about that study: 1st - If someone shows that professors favour males - that does not show that females are oppressed! You can take the results and say anything you want, including "Women are oppressed" or "Professors have a bad past with women and so they want males". 2nd There might be hidden biases: 1) Any study not showing differences would probably not even be published. So the fact that there is one study showing something might be just a natural outlier in a higher …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:59 AM
4

Just don't buy them! Easy solution.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:00 AM
1

Well. But for me it still sounds better than having private hospitals and medical insurance companies and still forcing everyone to have that insurance. Or having private universities and then requiring a degree to get a job. Can we compare socialism with capitalism when in reality there is no pure-social or pure-capitalist country? There is something called anarcho-socialism but I haven't heard of that. And we are very off-topic now :)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:16 PM
–

OK. You lost me there. There are countries with higher level of socialism (France, Sweden, Norway) than Baltic states, are there not? And they are doing way better than more capitalist countries in terms of standard of living and equality (genie index). In fact they are the very first in the world. I am all for socialism in some areas (like education, health, police, etc). In other cases you will have universities with high fees, so high that young women are forced to prostitute themselves for a…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:10 PM
–

To clarify about retirement age: "http://www.sodra.lt/index.php?cid=182&new_id=21574" There is a table on the bottom that shows that retirement ages for women will be increased more steadily and in 2026 retirement age will be equal for men and women. (it was 5 year gap a couple of years ago). Your country has more traditional values. The male is still respected, but he is respected for the work he does for women. He is still disposable and a man who is of no use to society or to women is deemed …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:03 PM
–

I have read that Lithuania has a high emmigration rate. Is that true? Yes it is true. I think the rate is slowly decreasing and was highest 3-4 years ago, but not so sure about that. The vast amount of emigrants are people who are finishing schools and were not able to find a job or to get a degree in higher education. Majority of emigrants go to UK and Ireland and from what I've heard they are doing quite a mess there. They increase the crime rate, steal, etc. So much that there was a warning w…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:16 PM
–

What led me here. Well. I was raised by a single mother. She did an fantastic job in that (in my opinion) but I was raised to be somewhat of a "white knight". Then I stumbled on youtube channel called "barbarosaaaa" and that led me to MGTOW and then here. So basically I started to go here to explore the darker sides of female psyche and feminism. Also I have a feeling that the tide of feminism is slowly turning towards eastern Europe as well. So better be prepared. You can read my reply to "Obvi…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:07 PM
–

Yup we were last pagans (according to my history lessons). I like that fact :) However there is a little hypocrisy in those history lessons. For example in early middle ages all the battles against Christians were praised and all the Dukes of Lithuania are honoured for staying strong. But when one of those Dukes gave up to the Christians he was also praised by history books for "converting" the nation and uniting with Europe... Nowadays there still are some underground pagan movements, they have…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:28 PM
–

Hm. alcohol consumption, suicide rate and longevity are probably related.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:14 PM
–

Again not in my experience :) The highest recommendation I got when applying for a phD. was from University of Toronto, and prof. there also said to write my own letter and then send it to me so he can sign and mail it. And he said it was standard practice in his lab. Maybe it depends on how well you know the professor or his style of doing things? Are there steps taken to ensure the confidentiality? And even if the letters in that research were all confidential - my point might still stand. Pro…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:27 PM
–

Not in my experience. So far everywhere I went I had to write my own letter of reference and all prof. did was blindly sign it.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:05 PM
–

You were the one who pressed "like" :)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:51 PM
–

Here you make one assumption: That "getting shit done" is better than "time wasting". This is probably true for most industry/corporate workers but should not be easily extended to artists or academics. By only "getting shit done" one can forget to think, step back and observe the bigger picture. And what about philosophers and mathematicians? They hardly ever get anything done. "Time wasting" can be useful. i.e. Richard Feynman said in the interview that he was "burned out" after nuclear bomb p…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:18 PM
–

TIL: My country is one of the worst (Lithuania)... I'll be damned. And I though MensRights issues are not relevant here. Anyway, about the testosterone: Any genetic/biological causation study should be taken with a brick of salt. For example it can be proven that there is a relation between carrying a lighter in your pocket and lung cancer.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:02 PM
2

Sure. Here is one reply Second Third Forth Fifth Sixth And here is a reply from profesional Followed by And lot's of upvotes and many original posters deleting their replies. This happening (lies being exposed) is pretty rare in /r/relationships . If it would not have reached subredditDramma it would probably have left with all the pretenders and lies unexposed. Another one like that I remember was also about nudity. The statement there was that in Europe nudity is much more accepted in the publ…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:38 AM
2

Yes, that was the one! But I did not follow the updates, so don't know if they separated or not. What stood out for me there is that majority of repliers lied (or so it seemed) about their experience with the acting industry. Also: I've gotten some pretty decent advice from some of the more frequent people who go there (including many of the mods) often. Certainly not my experience. Never asked for any advice myself, but can't remember any solid advice besides "lawyer up" or "couples counseling"…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:18 PM
3

Have to agree to a certain extent. But where I live the haircuts for men always start at a certain level and haircuts for women typically always start at least 1.5x times more. So even if women is going for simple shortening of her hair - she will probably still pay more. Talking about clothing - it is true that t-shirts and jeans cost aprox. the same amount for both. But the specialized stuff, like underwear, socks and skirts typically costs more for women (in my limited experience at least). A…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:13 PM
–

Vote with your feet and don't go there. "Concerts" like these are a sign of the sunset of mainstream culture anyway. Women have it bad as well - overpriced haircuts and expensive clothing, shoes, skin/hair products. But they can only blame themselves for not voting with their feet and being lured so easily (Sure they choose to blame "patriarchy" but that's a whole other issue).
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:32 PM
–

I will repost my old opinion: I used to frequent /r/relationships In my opinion that reddit is full of teen-girls with no real experience of dating or relationships. Also with people who lie about their gender and who lie about their personal life just to push the point. People there rarely offer any advice, but rather pass their judgement. And if someone disagrees with their case - shitload of downvotes are loaded. So it may not be SRS there, but the climate of that subredit itself. Also it is …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:13 PM
–

Hm. I wonder if that is what I did. I might take the evo-psych too literally without notifying first. Just wanted to openly disagree with the points he showed as a sign of manipulation. So what you're doing here is replacing one set of generalizations with another. Saying that women have higher post-sex consequences maybe is a generalization. But it's true. At least for fertile women. And I don't see any more generalizations in my post. But rather different angles to look at the same points the …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:28 AM
2

my take on summary of this article: "It's time we ditched having character, dreams and sense of achievement. Surely those things can't help women clean the houses and take care of children! Instead of being free and doing what you want to do without worrying about the opinion of others - just settle down and try to leave something for your kids." Since when banality, safety and mediocrity became the highest values of mankind?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:17 AM
–

I fail to see any kind of evidence or example of an actual manipulation anywhere in his theory. Women are forced to lie about the amount of sex they want. They probably want sex. But not with just about anyone. And not without a guarantee of protection. They don't have as much sex because they want to keep the "price" of sex high. Well maybe because the consequences of pregnancy (something that the sex is for) are much higher for females. Women punish sexually open females. Well most of men woul…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:56 PM
–

Here is one aspect of women liberation and how it started: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-TYCXnAaZU to double the income of certain products, by including half of the population as potential customers. Another angle: By pushing women to work companies are getting more potential employers. Thus they can lower the salaries almost 2 times (since workforce is doubled by including women). And a typical household earns just as much as before! , except that now both parents are working from morning …
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:33 PM
0

It was not it. Once I heard about this "RES" I thought it must come with a fee. Like "VIP" status which has some kind of a fee on many sites. Now I am pleasantly surprised.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:39 PM
–

Danke!
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:37 PM
–

Thanks! Seems to work on linux here. /off to explore upvote/downvote ratios.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:37 PM
2

Yes, I don't disagree that this is anecdotal evidence. I was not the person who talked about 70% of women and 15% of men justifying their actions in infidelity. Waiting for source, just like you are! Just wanted to fill in the silence with some personal encounters while browsing some relationship subreddits. And there totally are guys who justify their actions based on high sex drive. But the stuff he was saying (about 70 vs 15 percent) somehow seems possible to me. Considering that men are more…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:22 PM
–

Just lurk around /r/relationships or /r/relationship_advice and you will see plenty of examples. Like: "He is just too nice to me" "He is just too bad with me" "He was deadbeat" "He tried too much to impress me" "He was too controlling" "He didn't care where I was going" Seems like whatever you do can be turned into a reason. It's like when she likes you - your jokes about women are funny and witty, and when she does not - your jokes are in bad taste and disgusting. I've even seen some lady decl…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:54 PM
–

But all other branches of psych are even more BS, so evo psych is the best we got at the moment. (And in my opinion it makes much sense).
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:13 PM
–

Maybe it's not the place to ask, but - how do you see the amount of both upvotes and downvotes at the same time? All I am seeing is the total sum.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:41 PM
1

It's just saying that being over-aware is also a bad thing since the tests are not 100% accurate. The more unnecessary screening will be done - the more false positives will occur. And it's not only women that demand the additional screens but also doctors/clinics that allow/push them for additional tests. There are some interesting studies researching the effectiveness of such screening: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153831/ "A medical practitioner performing 200 tests each year w…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 04:56 PM
–

Awareness is so HUGE that it is potentially over-screened. http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-08-22/entertainment/29936864_1_pap-tests-cervical-cancer-gynecologic-oncologist
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:59 PM
1

There were two women who criticised the view. One of them has a title of "feminist evolutionary researcher Barbara Smuts.". I am not sure how feminism and evolution fit together, but here you have it. Evolution itself also has tons of loony critics. Amount of criticism is no basis for people to doubt it. My dog? He sees a bitch in heat he goes for it...I'd like to think that humanity is slightly above that leval I am just saying that what you like to be truth and what is truth can be different i…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:43 AM
–

However, there is a vast gulf of a difference between wanting or desiring something and taking it without permission. Agree. But that is not what I am talking about at all. Asking who is wrong in a particular situation is one thing. And asking how one, knowing that the criminal type of people exist, can lower their risk of becoming a victim is another. Do you agree with this difference, or am I the only one who thinks there is a difference? You didn't answer the female rapist scenario happens. I…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:09 AM
–

MRA is diverse and I don't think there is a set of issues that everyone agree on. To be clear: I don't represent MRA on any level, because the movement is not (yet?) relevant in my country. And I never consider what kind of implication my opinions would have on the image of something (like the nature of being male). All I care about is if they are reasonable or not. So that hopefully answers your third point. What you are arguing about when talking about clothing is the style of clothing. What I…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:41 PM
–

.and the rather understandable frustration of being questioned about such things which should not have any bearing on the issue. There is no consensus about this. I and many others have an opinion that dressing a certain way might increase your chances of being raped. And I am pretty sure those police and other authorities didn't "blame the victim" they just gave some advice. Rapist still has full responsibility for the crime, but there are certain things everyone can do to lower their chances o…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:36 PM
–

I wonder how many of them were actually raped.... ? (insert long silence here) To me it seems like majority of those slut-walkers just want to get some male attention. Imagine how ironic is that. A slut-walk. Females who want male attention. Doing a parade against males paying attention. To slut-walkers.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:43 PM
1

From the other angle: U.S.A. is the only country that have used nukes on civilian cities. It's a little sad that at the moment there is no alliance strong enough to take all the WMDs out of U.S.A. And we know U.S.A. has WMDs not only because they used them previously in large scale, but also because they openly admit it.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:38 AM
–

The argument assumes that males are more likely to get help then females. In my current opinion it's the opposite. To make a counter-argument you can just point out that males are the majority of homeless-people, majority of suicide victims, majority of addicts, majority of violence victims. None of these made any help free for these men. Why would abortion be any different? Oh I know - because it is an imaginary example that will never happen. Ask him of any example where this is happening (i.e…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:11 AM
3

once I read the topic I instantly thought about this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fC53_XvYXQ especially at the end, when he talks about "The Cause". Sure this is different context but same general insights surely apply to problems MRAs facing.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:48 PM
-1

I used to frequent /r/relationships In my opinion that reddit is full of teen-girls with no real experience of dating or relationships. Also with people who lie about their gender and who lie about their personal life just to push the point. People there rarely offer any advice, but rather pass their judgement. And if someone disagrees with their case - shitload of downvotes are loaded. So it may not be SRS there, but the climate of that subredit itself. Also it is full of straight up lies: once…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:07 PM
1

I will repost what I've posted on this issue before: "Most IQ tests are constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males.[91] Because environmental factors affect brain activity and behavior, where differences are found, it can be difficult for researchers to assess whether or not the differences are innate. Areas where differences have been found include verbal and mathematical ability." source = wiki IQ test are constructed and therefore we can construct a t…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:56 PM
–

Being competitive, aggressive, intelligent and judging are male traits. Those are not useless in the current environment if your goal is to make money (which she seems to be pushing with the concept of "breadwinner"). Caring, emotional empathy, kindness. Now that are some useless traits for a "breadwinner". Why masculinity has to be changed?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:32 PM
–

I've seen her on "men are finished" debate somewhere on youtube. It went something like this: Oposition: "If men are finished, why most of top scientists, CEOs, sportsmen and politicians are still male?" HR: "girls were oppressed x years ago, they did not have the same rights to education as men did, and now they are picking up!" Opposition: "But now MEN are oppressed and left behind in education" HR: "YES! Thats why men are finished!". .... And now she is talking about the need to redefine "mas…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:49 PM
1

I am assuming that rapists go after women that turn them on. And women with light clothing turn them on more. And I think that is a fair assumption on my part, because turning men on is the sole reason for sexy skirts and high heals. people with personality disorders select on the basis of psychological features. I agree. BUT Not all rapists have personality disorders. Just like not all thieves have personality disorders. Or all liars. So that part of rapists should be excluded. They might do it…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:17 PM
1

Nooo, it's just something that stupid people like to say. If less clothes meant more rape, there would be strong seasonal and geographic correlations. False. What is provoking in terms of clothing is different in different geographic locations and at different season of the year. One can get used to the amount of nudity. You can check that on yourself, when in the spring all the mini-skirts probably attract your attention, but in the summer even g-strings at the beach don't even catch an eye. ra…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:56 PM
–

To be honest I still hold my opinion that men do it more often than women (talking about real rape, not the U.S.A. definition). But that might be changing with the current laws some countries are proposing or the social structure in general. But we are off topic now. The topic was about "don't dress like a whore" being a bad advice. Because we expect humans not to act like animals. But we just agreed that humans act like animals. So it must be a good advice!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:36 PM
–

I thought so yes. I think there are biological reasons for men to do it far more often. But if we are to believe the numbers you just showed here - then it looks to work both ways :)
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:21 PM
–

You just prove my point. We should not expect humans to act any different from other animals.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:12 PM
1

"You should not dress like a whore it will decrease you chances of getting raped or assaulted" Bad advice (Statistically unproven). With the rape definition as wide as it is and all the false claims added - one cannot conclude anything from the statistics you are talking about.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:47 PM
1

I, for one, agree with you completely on this. Everyone here saying "don't dress like a whore" is a bad advice, just need to do a thought experiment: imagine a nude women walking the dark street and another - with clothes. Think about which one of those will get more sexual attention. And go from there.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:34 PM
3

No problem. Glad that helped. I take sources seriously :)
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:56 PM
–

“I am not sure what purpose their release would serve other than a legal one and the consequence would be to imperil our troops, the only protectors of our foreign policy, when we most need them, and British troops who are trying to build security in Afghanistan." From: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5395830/Abu-Ghraib-abuse-photos-show-rape.html If you were talking about this quote.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:50 PM
–

I think article have some links to other sources. Also: Here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition And here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse Also you can search wiki for "USA war crimes" to find more. For the SAME article / different source - not yet. But will let you know if I find something. EDIT. and here is one source that the article linked to: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5395830/Abu-Ghraib-abuse-photos-show-rap…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:41 PM
2

Privately run prisons might have something to do with that. You guys, Israel and UK are the only ones that have tried something as sick as that. And I think U.S.A. now is the only one left.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:59 PM
6

oh. misread that. Thanks!
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:34 AM
–

Are elliptical machines bad for the knees?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:23 AM
7

I will take some of those. Which gender is raped and impregnated as an act of war? Well. Which gender is killed, tortured and RAPED as well as an act of war? Which gender commits less than 1% of those rapes? OH. Of THOSE rapes. There is no such gender, because women don't normally go to war in the first place. Also it never even happened in your country. And unlikely it ever will. Which gender has never been elected president or vice president of the United States? If we believe in democracy the…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:15 AM
–

The one I disagree the most with is that women are dolling-up for reasons other than being attractive to men. All the others - I can agree with.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:59 AM
–

Bit part of the women who come here start their posts like this. Other big part has "gonewild" pictures. Do /r/MensRights only attract the attention of an attention-seeking histrionic hipster sub-type of women?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:20 PM
–

"Women can do anything that the boys can do" Sure. Well maybe not ALL women and ALL boys but in general. But these are boys - what about men?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:34 AM
-1

I am glad my girl has none of those. On the other hand she is a little of histrionic type. But all women are. Aren't they? m? m?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:44 AM
3

My upvote goes to you.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:17 AM
–

Yup. Touching without permission is invasion of your personal space. But when other people look at you because you are semi-nude on the street or doing a slut-walk. It's only natural and you did that to yourself. Or to rephrase - you did that because you wanted to be objectified. That whole "Wow. Seriously, wow." from MistyKnits is so out of place. Wanting to provoke some kind of a shocked reaction to win an argument. Low. EDIT: spelling
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:18 AM
6

I would say women objectify themselves far more than men do.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:58 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=y5OdQGbVNa4#t=790s I hate manhood academy as much as the next guy. But this short clip illustrates my opinion about "objectification" pretty well. Which is that women objectify themselves more than men do.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:57 AM
–

This girl right here... ...Is addicted to attention.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:47 PM
–

If you drink yourself - your fault. Does not matter blackout or not. If you are forced to drink - not your fault. That's my take on it.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:43 PM
1

I upvote you! Getting offended by things you can't control and change is pretty childish.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:28 AM
1

"Think about when you hit on a girl next time. Maybe like that time in a taxi she does not want you to" Only possible solution (except for mind reading) - never hit on women.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:15 AM
0

In my opinion this is a battle no one should pick. How he or she is expected to behave is not so easy to change. It's in the society and it's hard to change views. How can it be changed within this generation? Censoring of the films where males portrayed as predators? Restricting the freedom to opinion and speech? Sounds horrible. Best MRA can do now is to fight against what can actually be changed in their generation. Like laws, biased opportunities and unequal distribution of mandatory service…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:14 AM
1

No way. Do you want to know more? One Two Three
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:01 PM
3

"Imagine people arguing about whether free elections where everyone can vote is good or bad for economy. They are missing the point. They might come to the right conclusion, you know. They might support free elections where everyone is allowed to vote. But their arguments would be weak ones. And if we let such important things rest on mere economics, mere short-term practicality that means we have lost sight of what is really important." Richard Stallman.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:50 AM
–

I am 100% for women here. What I don't like is that some people change their attitude when they start talking with a female. Suddenly instead of logic much more emotional texts are used, issuing apologies in advance and similar stuff. Also a lot of agreeing and trying to get validated. Of course the opposite (insults and accusations, sexism) is worse. But I don't see much of it.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:09 AM
–

What you appear to be saying is that if someone does not like me saying something - then I should not say it to them because it will serve no purpose. And I agree. "Feel good" comments is not my thing. And never will be. I admit that. But I am never the one to push these talks onto people with PTSD. Where did they come from all of a sudden? No one here talked about PTSD. I am not trying to talk about what is the best way to care for people with PTSD. or it's a situation where their brain won't s…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:00 PM
2

In October 2006, Dershowitz wrote to DePaul University faculty members to lobby against Finkelstein's application for tenure. The university's Liberal Arts and Sciences faculty voted to send a letter of complaint to Harvard University.[66] In June 2007, DePaul University denied Finkelstein tenure.[67] More HERE I don't like him for this reason, because I endorse Finkelstein. He used his authority to hide the flaws of his book by denying tenure to his opponent. That is the lowest of lows in my un…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:20 PM
–

Ok I hear you. Question - at what point does someone become responsible? Is telling someone who was trying to ride a lion and lost a leg "what where you thinking" considered victim blaming?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:04 PM
–

Think of it as "what were you thinking" type of thing. For example: You have nice a car. You leave it in a dark corner of the city unlocked. Someone steals your car. Is saying that you should not leave the car unlocked equals victim blaming? It's like "you left the car unlocked? what were you thinking?" Same with rape. You start walking nude in the forests where heroin addicts hang out. You get raped. Is saying that you should not have done that victim blaming? It's like "you walked nude at nigh…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:02 PM
–

I've been in that situation. Not rape or cheat, but going along with it even though I don't want to because I'm scared of the repercussions. That's where my understanding of women ends. :) Or men who also do this. To me it sounds like having a weakness somewhere in character. That's why instead of a person waiting for their partner to say no they should ask questions and get a clear yes before proceeding. If someone starts the proceeding and the other does not object - that would be one big yes …
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:19 AM
5

I am not an official member of MRM (not active), but I very much share some of their views. I think women can freely post here, why "I shouldn't be posting here" attitude? There are even women who are active in MRM. I think you will get the warmest of welcomes. Sad to hear what happened to you and hope you are doing better. Majority of this community are very much against, not promoting rape, despite what feminism would say. What MRM is against is false-rape and drunk-sex-and-regret-as-rape. Unt…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:08 AM
–

I was basically arguing the same thing a few months ago on /r/relationships I think. Was downvoted way down to hell of course. There were a lot of posters that came asking the question which can be averaged to "I got drunk with some guy, we started talking about sex, he began to undress me, I did not want to be rude but I was against it, we had sex. I regretted it and wanted to stop in the middle but was afraid to be rude again, also I kind of enjoyed it as well. Was I raped or did I cheat?". No…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:45 AM
2

There are studies saying that schizophrenics are less violent than an average person when controlled for substance abuse. Just wanted to do justice to schizophrenics. And I agree with the rest of your comment.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:15 AM
–

I am not sure there would be any reliefs. What I was getting at is that the wishes those women have are not their own or in other words - they are conditioned. For example cigarets were once considered a symbol of male dominance and there was a taboo for women to smoke cigarets. And then it all changed so that women smoking cigarets were portrayed as free and empowered. But the transition from "symbol of male power" to "symbol of female freedom" was not done by society. In fact this was a market…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:14 PM
–

I very much disagree with forcing women to dress in certain ways. To me that is a clear indication of males controlling their jealousy. But came here to ask you opinion about this: Imagine if all the laws were gone in some Muslim country. I don't think we would see a sudden increase in nude women walking on the street because the conditioning of the society would still be there. And in countries like US people don't have such strict rules, but the conditioning of society in my opinion is even st…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 05:46 PM
0

I see your point. But at the same time I see that you are for some reason offended by my opinions. Sorry, man, didn't want to start hostile arguments. I agree that rape is unjust, bad, and should be dealt with. Just don't agree that suggesting to take precautions (as dress less modestly) is victim blaming. Telling a man to protect his Lamborghini by locking it and not leaving it at dark corners of suburbs is not victim blaming the same way. If you don't agree that under-dressed women is bigger p…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:40 PM
–

Theories are constructed by merging the evidence and facts into one body. To say it's "merely a theory" is not doing justice to what a theory is. As a common example of this - gravity is (only) a theory. No, evolution favors men who are able to "get" women. Evolutionarily speaking, women are less likely to keep children who are the products of rape. There is a thing called "paternity uncertainty". Often women cannot know for sure whos the child is. There were even studies that stated that the ch…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:30 AM
–

Well here we disagree. I think evolutionary psychology has the larger base of evidence than all the other branches of psychology combined. Here is the view I am putting forward: Men who are unable to get women have the only chance to have offspring - rape. So evolution favors rape. At the same time women who are not aware of the signals they are sending are at a higher chance to have an (post-rape) offspring. So evolution favors women who are ignorant of mens intentions and what turned them on. …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:35 AM
–

Don't wear a miniskirt is also a sane advice for someone who is afraid of rape. Some evolutionary psychologists put it this way: "Young women should be informed that, during the evolution of human sexuality, the existence of female choice has favored men who are quickly aroused by signals of a female's willingness to grant sexual access. Furthermore, women need to realize that, because selection favored males who had many mates, men tend to read signals of acceptance into a woman's actions even …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:05 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-inactivation Very relevant.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:54 AM
2

Just came to say that Dawkins was not the main figure behind this "selfish gene" stuff. Hamilton was regarded as a poor lecturer. This shortcoming would not affect the popularity of his work, however, as it was popularised by Richard Dawkins in Dawkins' 1976 book The Selfish Gene. Just wanted to give credit where it's due.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:08 AM
2

I highly advice for you to take a few minutes and watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY This is not about boys, but education in general. Should be useful!
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:53 AM
2

Most IQ tests are constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males.[91] Because environmental factors affect brain activity and behavior, where differences are found, it can be difficult for researchers to assess whether or not the differences are innate. Areas where differences have been found include verbal and mathematical ability. One can construct an IQ test in such a way so it favors women. Also it can be constructed so that it favors men. And that is wh…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter