Playnether Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
22	Regarding the "Marriage Strike"		Playnether	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 12:21 AM
3	EOTM: Feminism Exposed: Our blindness to feminine evil -- by David Shackleton		Playnether	/r/MensRights	19/10/12 05:35 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Thinking about leaving my fiancee and taking our baby with me. Just curious as to how/why you got together and had a baby with this woman in the first place? I'm not trying to blame or anything, just honestly curious how you got into this situation. I feel hearing about it might help others avoid similar situations in the future.	/r/MensRights	12/11/12 02:03 PM
1	Men Are Not Necessary, as evidenced by success of women-only communities. An exclusive interview with Laureen Dawd Men are not necessary, but yet they continue to complain about not enough "good men" marrying, child support and alimony. Men are not necessary, I guess....just the money and sperm we provide.	/r/MensRights	12/11/12 01:52 PM
0	It's nice to see the pussy pass is alive and well... "The poisoned legacy of feminism is that it considers even arrested adolescence to be too much to ask of most women and demands the right to claim a state of infancy as the natural state for women. Just as the female infant is picked up and comforted more quickly than the male infant who must cry longer and more aggressively, ie. perform, for attention, females now feel entitled to the best of everything without having to DO anything to get it except look cute. And when they outgrow their infant…	/r/MensRights	05/09/12 02:06 PM
1	Regarding the "Marriage Strike" also for the utilitarian purpose of giving more women access to the financial and emotional security of marriage. Could you elaborate on this?	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 05:04 PM
1	Regarding the "Marriage Strike" Actually, I think it would be the other way around. The man would be expected to sire children from both women. This in turn means having to provide more, which means having to work more. And in turn, provided we carry over the bullshit divorce laws and biased court system this would mean men would get fucked over multiple times. Multiple marriage system is really pointless anyways. Because, in effect the only advantage would be getting to sleep with multiple women...but again, you do that witho…	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 04:59 PM
1	Regarding the "Marriage Strike" Are you saying they would attempt to legitimize polygamy as a means to "draw back" men into marriage (or institution similar to it)? Indeed, try to provide men with more of an "incentive". However, even if this happened, I doubt it would work. Because one could still beg the question to that as one would to marriage now - "I can sleep with women and basically do everything without getting married now. So why would I go through this? What's in it for me"? However, I do think marriage will take qu…	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 11:20 AM
2	Regarding the "Marriage Strike" There really is tons of excellent articles on this website. To say I've been enlightened from reading through them is an understatement. I'd love to make a thread for every article on Reddit if i could lol. But for now, I'd like to suggest these: http://polk-high.blogspot.com/2012/08/zenpriest-13-prove-to-me-you-arent-bad.html http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2005/01/eotm-sexual-psychology.html The second is a bit of a long read (its three parts), but well worth it. I highly suggest everyone check th…	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 11:11 AM
6	'New Rule: Only Women Legislators Should Be Allowed to Vote on Women's Issues' Awww hell no!	/r/MensRights	04/09/12 12:23 AM
1	Breaking the Glasses: Effeminition: Feminist Logic, an editorial piece on reproductive rights and child support Brilliant article. The only argument that I didn't see debunked that supporters of the current system love to use is the "Its for the good of the children" reasoning. I honestly see this as flawed logic, but have a difficult time conveying how exactly I would explain it away in a debate concerning how the child support system is wrong.	/r/MensRights	01/09/12 03:16 PM
1	Never have children Why does one get the idea that if this situation were reversed (woman fighting to see her children which the dad got custody of, regardless of her ability to be a fit parent) we'd see a completely different story. The man would be labeled a villian and inhuman for denying the innocent mother a chance to see her children. Police would be acting immediately. There would be no explanations. They'd have filed the report themselves most likely and be knocking down his front door. Outrageous double st…	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 12:12 PM
2	Woman here, would someone mind clarifying some stuff for me? "It can be in reflexive situations which have a great discrepancy in policy and implementation. See what happens to MALE parents that fail to pay child support. Compare what happens to FEMALE parents that block visitation." Fixed for you.	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 12:42 AM
15	German circumcision ban: Is it a parent's right to choose? (x-post r/XYChromosomes) I like how permanently removing a beneficial part of a man's body is proven to enforce the relationship between him and a higher power. You'd think if this so-called God created them, he'd be against the mutilation of his creation. Hypocrisy abounds in religion. Its impossible to take seriously.	/r/MensRights	09/08/12 01:55 PM
2	The gender wage gap is a myth. Bad comparisons make for bad data. When I bring up this subject, I'm met with opposistion by women and white knights every time. One time, a white knight linked these as his way of proving the gender wage gap is real and women are indeed oppressed: http://jec.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=9118a9ef-0771-4777-9c1f-8232fe70a45c http://www.gao.gov/products/A83444 *http://abcnews.go.com/Business/myth-pipeline-inequality-plagues-working-women-study-finds/story?id=9868961&page=2#.T8exAWH1DvU	/r/MensRights	09/08/12 12:43 PM