TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pleasant-Toe8878 Archive

View 0 posts and 468 comments by Pleasant-Toe8878 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not. Both statements appear here frequently, both are moronic. Here I was specifically talking about the former. The latter is a separate subject which has been discussed endlessly and debunked as many times. Players and Chads are the biggest misogynists of all because they know darn well how many women are slaves to their belly butterflies and the shit they do to cover up their adventures.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 08:20 PM
1

Typical distorted female view of men which only registers desirable men and then jumps to a conclusion that undesirable categories of men don't exist, because "ALL kinds of men have success with women".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:16 AM
7

Thank you for having a sane view.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 08:44 PM
21

Yet women and bluepillers here (and on reddit as a whole) keep insisting that not being desired as a man is a moral and a character failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 08:29 PM
0

This is a weak point and not that big of a problem. What you should say instead is that I'd still have to find a young women to build a high quality relationship with — which is the actual, and a much more serious challenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 11:02 AM
-1

Meh, in 10-20 years I expect to have the option of having a fresh set of balls grown from my own stem cells, which would resolve this fully.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:36 AM
-1

No way in hell. Men here often complain how bad they have it compared to women. In a strictly defined context, which is dating opportunities in the 16-30 range and pre kids. And even then, it's not that black and white. I was born in a dysfunctional family with a horrible mother who broke me as a kid. As a man, I have a lot more time to fix myself and then have a chance to have kids and break the generational trauma. I'm 40 and hope to finish fixing my head in a few years, there's still time. Ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:38 PM
0

I have zero problems paying on the first date. The women in my experience who insisted on paying themselves were either insufferable or narcissists (found this out the hard way). Having said that, I must add: if she's not willing to just walk in a park as a first date, she's not that into you and will likely never be.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 01:07 PM
1

Most feminists I interact with are just normal people and don't have a particularly academic education. And this is representative?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:55 AM
0

Showing up to court and saying “I want my kids” is hardly a fight. That's not how it works. Happy delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:14 AM
0

Yeah, what a horrible shitty argument. US built a legal system so hostile towards men that they have to fight to keep access to their children. And then you say "but when they do fight, they get it" as if it's a great virtue of the system and a failure on men's part. This reads very much alike "arbeit macht frei".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:11 AM
1

The problem here is that men have to fight. Spend money and energy they not necessarily have just in order to be able to keep spending time with their kids. And you people keep presenting it as something natural and right.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:07 AM
-2

I just actually listen to what feminists say A tiny proportion of feminists with academic education, which is not representative of general feminist population.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:03 AM
1

Why do you think no men are interested in marching and fighting for more parental access to their children? Because men have to work and build their lives. Because men are taught by their mothers to get what they want by achieving and not complaining. Because western education system indoctrinates and shames men that they are the oppressors and not the oppressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:56 AM
-3

You have some magic view of feminists as rational and smart people. Hint: it's wrong. And the concept of primary caregiver is wrong. It was created for the sole reason of discriminating against men, knowing full well it's against female biology to have a stay at home husband. It should be destroyed, and 50/50 custody should be strictly enforced.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:37 AM
9

The 2 kids are the result of your choices. You had your pick before you had them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:34 AM
3

You haven't read the post, have you? most feminists would agree that men and women should have equal standing under the law This is hilariously wrong. A large part of current legislation discriminates against men hiding behind sex-neutral terms such as "primary caregiver". Feminists do support it. And even then, there is a large part of female supremacy feminists who do not agree with equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:30 AM
5

I don't know about that. After the ego boost went away, it just reinforced my quite sad impression that only deeply unhappy and broken people participate in it. Yes, this includes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:56 PM
0

Is this supposed to be some sort of a gotcha? Yes, this applies to everyone. Having said that, we also should acknowledge that continuous rejection for reasons outside of your control and the innate need for love do take a heavy toll on self-esteem, and make it harder to achieve this feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:58 PM
2

Is he in the room with us right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:44 PM
1

That was just an obvious response to your larping.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:30 PM
0

Ok boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:12 PM
0

As for what men gossip about, it may not seem like a problem until a guy follows you home because he hears rumours you are easy. Ah, so we're down to ultra-unlikely scenarios. You ask someone out, and then you get a stalker because of it? Now that's some wild imagination. I'm going to say the stalker would do it regardless of whether you ask someone out. They really couldn't care less. Men have zero obligation of caring about random women's issues, and the reverse is also true. We have to do the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:04 PM
0

You do you, sweetie, it's your life, your choices and your accountability. Best of luck to you and your future partner!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:52 PM
-1

We do have instincts. And seeking out the strongest, most confident, high testosterone and successful males to mate with is one of the female instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:40 PM
3

It is men who are complaining here but women are told they are the problem The reverse happens way more outside of PPD and the manosphere. But I'm happy to settle for equal: both sexes have done more than enough to offend each other. We do not exist for you. Thanks for the manifesto, I agree. It's up to each individual person to decide if they need a reason to exist and what it is. Now how is it relevant to what's been discussed above? Also, I gotta add, for someone who claims to not exist for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:36 PM
3

The choice is ours, not yours. Absolutely true. The choice of what to base your worth on is also yours. And you choose to include gossip, apparently. Perhaps you should read up on subtle, non verbal cues that invite approach. Yeah, and accept playing the women's "I'm not accountable for anything" game. No, thanks, I don't want grown ass women with a kindergarten mentality in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:18 PM
2

Outside perspective: Being so worried about something someone can say or do looks more like an anxiety disorder than a societal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:13 PM
8

As well as for just existing. Maybe women should have their own sense of worth not influenced by what some idiots say.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:08 PM
-3

i'm pretty sure there are close to none of the second option This is exactly how a high share of casual sex in the club scene happens. Delude yourself all you want, life doesn't care. i'm also pretty sure that first one will be called desperate and slut regardless By a few idiots, maybe. Not by anyone with a fraction of a functioning brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:00 PM
4

Then you're lying to yourself. Women are drawn to the smell of true confidence stronger than dogs are to drugs in the airports.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:57 PM
3

Good point. So it's one of these: Win the genetic lottery Put in the effort and live life on your terms Don't play the game and go MGTOW. The choice is yours, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:51 PM
-5

What's stopping her from breaking contact with them at the first sight of such treatment?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:49 PM
1

You really don't understand the difference between "I like you, let's talk to see if it's mutual and if we're compatible," and, "I like you, let me suck you off in the nearest bathroom," do you? The first woman is approaching, the second one is easy or a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:59 PM
2

Thinking in terms of "I gotta impress her" is fatal. Step one is getting rid of this mentality. The only person you need to impress is yourself. Here are a few questions you should ask yourself: Do you feel confident about your body and face? If not, are there reasonably attainable changes that would help? (first and foremost, getting below 15% body fat) Do you feel confident about yourself and your life? If not, is it objective (to answer this, compare it to your peers and not instagram) or is …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:46 PM
5

What sort of numbers would that be? Just to ensure you're constructive and not trying to weasel your way out of the discussion by asking to quantify mental health.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:34 PM
5

Let me simplify this for you: the time and effort wasted approaching is way better spent working on yourself and the world around you so women start approaching you instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:28 PM
10

This take completely and utterly strips women of any agency or the ability to choose. Which is the complete opposite of our biology. Women are choosers, and no amount of chasing is going to make them want you. What men have to do is attract, not chase. Fix your mental health, fix your testosterone, fix your body, fix your face. Find or create an environment where you stand out. Find a way to ensure a steady inflow of desirable women into this environment. The rest will work itself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:23 PM
0

how can women know which guys "want to please but don't get much opportunities"? If only there was a way, like, you know, talking to the guy. Women are going to do anything to present themselves as helpless victims having no agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:35 PM
1

There are quite a few good ones here, haven't you seen them? I would direct him to the red pill, the actual TRP , not "andrew tate" or that pile of mud myron gaines Lean muscle. I know it’s a hell of a lot of hard work but getting that low bodyfat percentage can make anyone look a lot more attractive than before. prioritizing a healthy relationship with himself first a foremost, aka taking care of himself physically and taking care of himself mentally/emotionally
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:24 AM
1

Friend zone speedrun guide.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:24 AM
4

Simps are the source of oh so many problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:41 PM
3

You know that you can make more than one conclusion from a data set, don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:43 PM
2

So, women don't know what arouses them, but you? Why don't you quote me stating that something arouses women. But, speaking more broadly, men do know it a lot better, because they have been seducing women for ages. And going back to the OP, depth and loyalty have nothing to do with arousal. seems relatively unrelated to your point It is related to your point I quoted above. Let me reiterate: anything a woman says on what generates desire in her is likely bullshit, along with any studies based on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:34 PM
2

Ah yes, the classical blue pill "we are not animals, our sexual drive is wondrous and deep and not-at-all biological" delusion. Equally laughable and stupid. Of course, nothing I type here is going to help you out of this delusion, but at least it might help some readers. The lizard brain concept is outdated, I give you that. Nevertheless, modern neuroscience supports the idea that arousal originates in the limbic system. And that the prefrontal cortex is able to suppress desire. Different words…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:07 PM
2

By knowing basic biology. Sexual desire is controlled by the limbic system, also known as the lizard brain. The concepts of "good character" or "attractive personality" do not exist in it. What you're describing is an emotional safeguard, which is a good thing to have. But it is well known for failing. Here's how it happens: the lizard brain is the most powerful system. If it decides that it wants a specific dude strongly, the weaker parts of the brain are going to adjust by providing you with a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:56 AM
13

These are 2 very different things you're lumping together, hence the confusion. First one: Some women love bad boys, some, like yourself, do not. Second one: being a bad boy does not mean there is no loyalty or depth. Criminals build their empires on the sole basis of loyalty. The "bad boy" trope has no relevance to the question in your OP the way it's formulated now. I guess what you're trying to say is that you can't let your guard down and allow yourself to be aroused unless the guy displays …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 08:04 AM
1

Yet another "if you can't get laid, it's a moral problem" parrot act disguised with smart writing. No, it does not work like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:32 AM
26

No one says there are no people who value these. On the opposite, we ourselves in TRP value them very much. What we are saying is that these do not matter in the context of sexual desirability and do not generate arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:30 AM
2

Is this your first day here? No one claims that the marriage itself is what benefits men I see such claims nearly daily here on PPD. I actually had people defend the absurd claim that it's marriage that brings the benefits. As for healthy LTRs, yes, it's clear that they are beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:30 PM
1

And what does "trapped" mean, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:28 PM
1

Every single abuser displays exerting control. Over themselves and over the potential victims. Being unaware of the simplest fact that abuse always begins with control utterly disqualifies you from commenting on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 01:04 PM
2

given up on men because of how they have been treated by them The immediate counter here is that women are choosers, and if everyone you pick treats you badly, it definitely is the choosing which is the problem. Example from experience: I dated narcissists, and I chose to ignore the red flags. What did I do instead of blaming women for my poor choices? I went into therapy to get my head fixed. I got fucked up by women, yes. By my mother and the head teacher of my class in middle school. That's w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:57 PM
1

Yes. For those who found TRP already being married. Or for those who choose to gamble with horrible odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:56 AM
3

There's also survivorship bias. "Married men live longer" counts the men who stay married till death, which means it's the good relationship that provides the benefits, which is conceivable. Claiming that it's marriage itself that does good things for your health and happiness if you're a man is beyond stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:49 AM
1

It absolutely is. The red flags are always visible unless you're choosing to be ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:59 AM
6

If you're unaware that "don't get married" is the top RP advice, you really should not be commenting on anyting RP-related.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:44 AM
2

How have you managed to miss the word "industry" in the title?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:42 AM
5

Well here's the thing, the men — or, more specifically, the men who women want to treat them better, i.e., the top 0.1% of men — are not going to do this in any foreseeable future. Why would they? They already have a lifetime supply of women lining up to fuck them. The other men will, but women never cared or will care about their treatment. And then the OP is about the scam that the industry is, I can't see where you pulled the men out of.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:37 AM
11

All true, but the OP is not about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:35 AM
-2

control how others treat us Choosing whom to let and keep in your life is impossible then, huh? Sounds like another cheap excuse to avoid personal accountability for your life, to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:32 AM
1

You do you, but without kids in the picture the gender roles stop making any sense. Yes I’ve read some concerns that intellectual degradation would be a problem. But that’s based on the assumption on one just stays home and sloths all day which is far from reality. It only applies to mothers. And the reason is not slothing, it's hormonal changes and most of their company being /r/KidsAreFuckingStupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:42 PM
1

It's extremely popular among the pseudointellectual part of the liberal crowd to hate the traditional gender roles. I haven't seen it among people with actual brains. My only reservation is that I've seen fully-SAHMs degrade intellectually to a really bad point, but that's easily fixable by a 15-hr/wk part-time job. Nothing to do with providerhood though. EDIT: read your post again, so there's no kids. Then it's just BS. Living on easy mode is very bad preparation for when the kids do arrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:22 PM
22

I already stated twice that I agree with you. Men are at fault for the women they choose to tolerate. Does the same apply to women? EDIT: alright, so now everyone sees your hypocrisy. I'm going to call this one a win.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 02:15 PM
27

No, it's about having personal accountability. With regards to partner selection. Your post is highlighting that men should have it, and it's true, they should. Does the same apply to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 02:09 PM
70

So, essentially, "choose better," which I agree with. Does the same apply to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 12:33 PM
-1

it's hard to find women want that want them, apparently No. It's hard to find a woman who can be a trustworthy partner to enter an insanely difficult 20+-year-long project with, especially that there are other criteria for success, not only her personal qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 04:14 AM
-4

I don't have children yet, but I really want to. Did you personally want to become a father, or was having children something your partner wanted more strongly and you agreed to? It's my decision, and I won't be dating someone who doesn't want them. I’m also curious about how you view the long-term commitment that comes with having kids. Did you ever worry that having children could make it much harder to leave an unhappy relationship because of responsibilities like co-parenting, child support,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:23 AM
1

Small sample size and duration, extreme deviations, and this effect was shown in English culture only. Kinda weak, if you ask me. It's like the authors were trying really hard to find this specific effect, and even then didn't have much success.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:11 PM
1

Yeah, and shared custody is slowly becoming the default in the west. It's getting there, which is great to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:09 PM
6

Typical lack of understanding with regards to causation. Women select happier and healthier men for marriage. This is the reason. Not the marriage itself by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:22 PM
-1

Outside of wealth or citizenship, there is only one reason to marry. Which is to have children. So hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:17 PM
3

It happened in early 90's in Russia. The broken Soviet courts... Let's just say it would've been a waste of effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:11 PM
3

As much as my inner child wants to agree, we have to stay true to the actual statistics. This is true in absolute numbers, but it's only due to women getting more custody. Once you control for this and look at the rates of parental abuse, men and women become remarkably equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:10 PM
4

Thanks for the empathy, it's not every day that you see it here. I wish your dad could have taken you with him Yeah, that's not what the courts think.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:11 AM
13

It was my mother. She hurt my father so badly he had to run, and then it fell on me. She was abused by her stepmother too — her mother died when she was 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:09 AM
30

Yelling, controlling, devaluing kids' emotions and interests, humiliating, not providing the feeling of safe home. Can't speak for everyone, but that's what happened to me in addition to physical stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 10:42 PM
0

turning 30 won’t magically fix it Following RP advice did fix it for me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:51 PM
46

Yes. And it's insane how many people here deny that women abuse children just as much as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:42 PM
2

Ah, you're one of those. Enjoy your delusions. I'm not engaging. Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:28 PM
2

Feminism. Or, to be more precisely, female supremacy movement which it became after the rights got equalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:16 PM
-1

The red flag is on the treatment of men in the divorce courts, not necessarily on the fiancée.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:32 AM
1

I agree that I used an older definition. Semantics aside, see above — preferential treatment towards Stacies is simping, which on its own justifies getting the boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:44 AM
-1

No. A simp is a pathetic semblance of a man that happens to inhabit a male body. And responding to your OP, if such a creature displays preferential treatment to 1% Stacies, then it is completely valid to reject it on the basis that it's not a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:40 AM
-2

Simps put up with so much shit from hot girls. FTFY. Simps are not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:31 AM
3

And when it comes to family court, men who don't fight for custody usually don't get it. Men who do, do. Yeah, and you make it look so natural and right that men need to fight for it. Why the fuck is 50/50 not the default?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 12:03 PM
–

What a pitiful load of nonsense. Literally every sentence here has zero relation to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:45 PM
–

So black pill too?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 02:41 PM
1

They fail at the very first step, which is admitting it's them who made poor choices. Without it, it's just assigning blame externally.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:33 AM
0

Thanks for the detailed writeup, it really puts things into perspective. I'd say you need to be proud of yourself. Coming from an abusive home into a happy LTR is no small feat. Great job!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:41 PM
0

I’m always told I’m some kind of exception/outlier I'd say the same. Nevertheless, it's great to see positive experience as well, and I'm happy for you. Would you be able to pinpoint the key success factors (apologies for corpospeak, but these are the right words) for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:03 PM
–

The first one is. The second one is not, but he broke so many hearts by not committing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:30 PM
–

Fair enough, there are plenty of stupid people subscribing to RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:20 PM
5

And tbh I am surprised more men do not have a problem with what it says about male nature Choice 1: admit that we are all animals, we have bad ape instincts inside of us, align with your inner ape, tame it, make peace with the fact that people are still largely apes, get a better understanding of why people do dumb shit, be enlightened. Choice 2: deny the best existing explanation for the evidence on the singular basis that it offends you, become the moralist no one but other moralists likes, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:10 PM
–

Yeah, I have two dark triad friends who are very liberal. One is a serial cheater, the other one outright says he's not committing. Great job bringing politics into dating in as stupid of a way as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:45 PM
0

It is indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:36 PM
0

It seems that you're just a part of the wholesome world, and that's great tbh. Things are very different for broken people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:08 PM
–

That's oddly specific, but yes, it would be on the list of bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:56 PM
–

Good for you! If you're both happy, then I'm happy for you. Having said that, have you thought that the "misandrist" part could be related to things you say about men online?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:41 PM
0

Ah, so you're down to insults. Have a good day, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:29 PM
0

And how would that work in your opinion? You failed to answer the key question I asked. Sidelining hard, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:21 PM
–

paper abortions, divorces, child support, paternity fraud, domestic violence against men The repeating subject in these discussions is the disparity between how men and women are treated legally when it comes to these situations. These are legal problems, not interpersonal ones. Oh, and "choose better" absolutely applies to men. I don't understand, is this supposed to be some sort of a gotcha?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:15 PM
–

I'm talking about personal accountability for one's failings. And how would that work in your opinion? To me, it's clear: first sign of abuse, and she's out. Yet, it happens very rarely. Attractive abusers are. Unattractive abusers aren't. That's not true. Dark triad in itself attracts women sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:11 PM
–

I have not ever seen men do this. Men have far less choice to begin with, and even when they do choose poorly, they get told it's on them. Example from PPD: it's nearly unanimously agreed by local men and women alike that getting trapped and staying in the friend zone is the guy's fault. And it's (1) totally true, and (2) puts the accountability on the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:06 PM
–

Yes, they do. Followed by a complete and utter denial of any accountability for their mate choices and ignoring these flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 05:02 PM
–

Men en masse? Of course not. The man she wants to build a life with? Of course yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:58 PM
–

Yes, life is not fair. Personal accountability includes accepting that some of your choices can and do have lifelong consequences. How's that a surprise?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:47 PM
–

This is what women here on PPD keep saying. That if a guy is unsuccessful with women, it's his personality, and women can smell it a mile away. Are you saying they have their heads up their asses? (JK, I know they do).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:38 PM
–

What I did. Admit that they made the bad choices (they fail at this point, which the OP is about). Start thinking about how and why they choose these men. Be honest with themselves. Work on fixing their mental health issues before continuing to date (which in itself requires a lot of effort).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:34 PM
–

Ask your father. Ask your brother. Ask other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:31 PM
–

Yeah, because men never say, "don't stick your dick in crazy", right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:29 PM
–

They tend to be the loudest online. Not so many of them IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:27 PM
–

WTF does this even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:27 PM
–

Congratulations on making it personal where it wasn't even remotely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:25 PM
1

Eh, I would agree that most do not because they let their instincts choose for them, but some do. I'd say the problem is rooted in custody and family arrangements. In my experience, girls who have a stable family background, especially with a good father, do have this capability, even if he's not involved in the choosing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:21 PM
–

Choosing better is holding these men accountable because they would lose access to sex and relationships. Yet, abusers keep thriving sexually all over the globe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:14 PM
–

Fully agree here, there is a huge immature population subscribing to RP. Doesn't change what I said one bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:11 PM
–

We do choose better. Lol, no. What you're describing is choosing a stable safe betabux guy instead of a handsome dark triad abuser, and here's the thing: it is not a better choice by any significant means. It is entering a doomed relationship because you're going to lack the excitement down the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 04:03 PM
2

It's not the blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:57 PM
–

You horrible horrible scrote, you are "VICTIM BLAMING!!!" Thank you, I was thinking of posting something similar. However, "accountability" fits here way better than "responsibility". Here are the points I've gathered: Accountability is the flip side of power, it's a universal rule of the world. If you have a choice, you are the one accountable for the consequences of choosing Women online go to insane lengths to absolve other women of this accountability This is exactly why RP says, "women are …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:56 PM
3

This is settling, and it's an insult. She gets the boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:51 PM
1

I have a second cousin of the same age (both 40). She's on her 3rd marriage with kids from husband 1 and husband 2. She's a matriarch and had zero issues finding men to bend their knees to her throughout her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:42 PM
2

So rich coming from someone who does not understand basic logic or what a fallacy is. Have a good day mate, I think we're done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:28 AM
–

https://ijhmp.com/Uploads/2f0a0188-1380-46c7-8455-e3427b90a774.pdf The self-serving part.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:19 AM
–

sexual attraction doesn't mean anything for long term compatibility This deserves a Nobel prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:56 AM
–

To qualify as a fallacy, a statement needs to be used as a basis for a reason. Which I did not do. The reasoning was done in the first paragraph of my comment. Why do I have to explain such basic logical things to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:53 AM
–

Another commenter who does not know what a hyperbole is and conjures a personal attack in response. Have you been scrolling instagram during your English / Literature classes?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:50 AM
–

Unless it serves as an explicitly over-exaggerated example of a point right next to it, which is exactly how I used it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:47 AM
–

Ah, gotcha, so you don't know what a hyperbole is. I included a link, maybe take a few to educate yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:34 AM
–

Even better, your whole point is an attack on a part of me that you've conjured from your imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:24 AM
–

What a nice, well thought through, and factual comeback! Well I must be wrong then, it does not happen at all!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:18 AM
–

What exactly does this have to do with my comment or the OP? We were discussing instinctive behaviour in women, and there's a lot to be said. I do find human reproductive instincts problematic, both male and female alike, but we're not discussing our attitudes towards them. Yet you for some reason consider it "being angry" and "needing to bring women down". This means you actually bring your own attitude towards female instincts into the discussion where no one was doing it. And this was your on…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:12 AM
–

It's not the societal norms. It's a deep instinctive revulsion towards the idea that a guy could fake having better genes by self-improvement and tricking her reproductive system as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:55 AM
–

The issue isn’t that they “lie” in a literal sense But they do. It's just that women evolved to lie to themselves so they would have an easier time lying to others <— and this is instinctive behaviour as well. "It just happened, I never intended to have sex with him!", says a woman after a date where she waxed her labia beforehand to "look pretty for herself".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:46 AM
1

No, the character flaw he meant was deciding to date someone you're not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 10:27 AM
2

Now you're making sense. See how it's different from your previous comment which could've been easily widely misinterpreted because you've used generic "attraction"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:07 PM
5

Because you can't formulate it properly. "Attraction" can mean 5+ different things. Sexual attraction, emotional attraction, intellectual attraction, and many more, and here you are fooling yourself and others by lumping them all together. Once you separate them and translate it from broken womanese to proper English, which is, "He is not generating sexual arousal but displays comfort and stability," this becomes actually possible to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:42 PM
1

Please learn the difference between power and strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:35 PM
1

Strength, not power. No one stops you from learning how to kick him in the balls, getting a pepper spray, a dog, or a gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:26 AM
4

What is this BS? After a few years in the gym, proper eating, and working on my confidence, I regularly experience sexual objectification from women. Last one was 1.5 wks ago, on my way to the gym at 10pm, when I got stopped by two drunk MILFs one of which started flirting and grabbing my pecs. I fucking love it! When it comes from a woman I'm not into, I gently but firmly let her know it's not mutual but thank her for her interest. If I'm in an LTR, I allow myself to flirt a little but then mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:14 PM
1

Instincts are universal. Now, if you talk about a specific person, they are going to have each specific instinct influencing their behaviour in a stronger or weaker manner (sometimes even in a broken way), and there would be other qualities on top of the instincts as well. But it's really short-sighted to refuse to see how sexuality keeps manifesting itself in repeatedly similar manners across a large population and calling the best existing explanation "neurodivergence" because some idiots misi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:05 PM
8

Yeah, because recognising patterns of shitty ape-like instinctive behaviour in men and women is "neurodivergence", right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:53 AM
2

I'm Russian. It's pretty much the same deal here as in the US, but with one caveat: due to overall poverty and access to sugaring in Dubai, way more women are gold diggers. Otherwise, young women chase excitement: criminals, drug addicts and handsome guys, and then chase stability once they get burned or become single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:51 AM
–

that first line is just cheap dismissal. I understand why you might see it this way, but that's just a definition of a shit test.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:38 AM
–

Taking this phenomenon too close to one's heart labels one as a failed man to women. It's a collective shit test, nothing more. It's always going to be there, the female hivemind will always operate on shaming and guilt tripping men. I'd say it's a good thing, since it helps to prove the worthlessness of women's words: they love a man who sees right through this BS and knows better than to take it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:53 AM
–

Whatever. I'm not going to be rich, I'm not going to have perfect health, I'm very unlikely to have a functioning family. I'm going to try and do whatever I can, but shit has been stacked against me since my conception, so at least it's not my fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:02 PM
2

When men tell women about their poor dating choices, we’re brushed off as being jealous or mansplaining which is the new buzzword to shut down any piece of male advice given to a woman. It's worse, it's "VICTIM BLAMING" shrieked at the highest possible volume and pitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 06:15 PM
3

Women crave that shit. From dudes who get them aroused in the first place. And these guys don't need to commit or be available, each one has a line of women waiting to jump him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 05:56 PM
2

married *divorced. with their kids fucked up for life because of their parents' relationship issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 05:54 PM
1

mature, and ready for a serious relationship Or, in other words, burned by a few exes, and likely still longing for at least one of them. Which actually disqualifies her from being LTR material.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 05:51 PM
-4

Many women have this instinct of extracting resources from men using men's sexual attraction to them. And marriage allows them to do just that, it's a resource sharing contract. They select wealthier men, then use their resources, and then divorce, taking the house and whatever else they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:31 AM
–

Try it someday maybe. I bought mine from a professional restaurant store, and they should be 100% dishwasher proof, they are designed for several cycles a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:18 AM
–

Are you bothered by it in restaurants too? Because they sure as hell don't wash manually.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 09:45 AM
–

This seems like a quality issue of the dishes. In 30 years of using them, I've only seen colour and gold washed off — and even those off cheap dishes, and nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 09:32 AM
3

Getting friendzoned and especially staying there is 100% the dude's fault. Having said that, shitty women that play games and say "well maybe if you became my friend first", or "I first need us to get to know each other as a person", or "I need emotional intimacy before I can think of being together" then proceed to manipulate the gullible guy with no intention of being with him ever — they certainly exist, and they are not few.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 10:20 PM
–

Based on my N=1, chore-based relationships are far more stable than romantic ones. The professional one I have with my cleaning lady has been going on since 2018, for 8 years. She's seen 4 of my LTRs. Shits and giggles aside, I find cleaning to be a horrible thing, so I wouldn't want a woman I love to waste herself on it. Dishes are done by the dishwasher machine (how come so many ppl here don't have one btw?), I do laundry mostly myself, my cleaning lady does the rest. But cooking — it's differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:32 PM
-9

when fathers actually push for custody, they get some form of it in the majority of cases, often joint. This is a blatant lie. Shared custody has been on the rise lately and reached 30-35% in the past 3 years. Which is still far from the 80% which it needs to be in order to make the claim you're making.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:59 AM
1

women make support groups FDS would like a word with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:57 AM
1

I would normally agree, but you're very wrong here. "Fuck yes or no" is very famous RP advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:55 AM
1

Yeah, "Fuck yes or no" is very famous RP advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:53 AM
-8

Tell this to the judges. They are the ones mindlessly awarding custody to the mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:31 AM
1

Reddit is US by large. In any case, Sweden is the leader, and even there shared custody is only roughly 50%. So pretty much anywhere in the non-muslim world my point still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:18 PM
1

I'm Russian. And here, it's always the mother's custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:09 PM
0

Yes, I used it, and it proved you wrong — see above.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:06 PM
2

Care to back it up with statistics? Never mind, I looked it up myself. Shared custody is 30-35% in the last 3 years in the US, which is a huge improvement, but it needs to be above 50% to state that men don't lose access to their children. And, unfortunately, the rest of the world is greatly behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:02 PM
-4

Yeah, because these metrics don't quantify losing access to your children, which men regularly do. Once shared custody stops being the exception and becomes the default, we can revisit this discussion. Oh, and please don't conflate the burdens of childbirth with the impact of marriage. These are two separate actions, not at all required for one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 04:56 PM
-1

It's a huge risk to both parties! It's a large risk for both parties, agreed. But women benefit more from it. They select wealthier and healthier men. And then marriage is a legal contract for resource sharing. If you don't feel you benefit then surely you're not getting married? Me — of course not. Other people, well... I'd say the key reason for divorce is people getting married without understanding why they are doing it. You seem to see someone else changing their name to yours as a benefit?…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 04:46 PM
-8

For a man, getting married generally carries an insane risk with very little benefits. It's essentially an overly costly gift to his girlfriend-then wife. The modern legal system made sure of it. So yeah, the least the woman could do in return is take his last name and show the world she is part of his family now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 04:22 PM
–

land whale, pig, hamplanet None of these are gendered. Fat men are equally disgusting. So apparently you also unjustifiably victimise women where it's their life choices that are to be questioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:39 PM
–

Looks like you decided what the answer was before even asking the question. You are conveniently ignoring the parts of my answer which may challenge your pre-formulated answer. Why bother posting it then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:10 PM
–

They are not bad people as in "hurt others", no. Except for airplane seats and body smell, of course. They don't want to exert the effort to fix their health and attractiveness, yet every single one feels entitled to a fit attractive partner. It's the combination of the two that is disgusting. theyre very expensive They are not. Apart from saving on groceries, they cost way less than heart failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 12:54 PM
–

GLP-1s have been available for over 10 years now. Great info on how to eat properly has been available for over 20 years. Physical activity and not stuffing your mouth have been available forever. Being a hamplanet is a decision, and a continuous one at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 12:34 PM
1

There aren't really good statistics about women liking bad men. The dark triad studies don't exist then, do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:42 PM
3

There it goes again. You know, it's completely unforgivable in today's time to keep perpetuating these untruthful and ignorant claims when all you need to do is type a question into google and get a response describing the real situation with actual science to back it up. So you are clearly only interested in spreading and parroting lies. Why bother coming here at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:17 PM
1

DV is done by men and women equally, men are more capable. There have been endless discussions here with sources, it's time to quit the "mainly men do DV" BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 09:26 PM
1

This is a well put summary. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 12:31 PM
3

Yes, and you deserved it for wasting my time trying to criticise me for what I never said because you can't understand how comment indentation works. Run to the mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 10:16 PM
5

Ah, so it's a reddit skill issue. You managed to completely ignore that the two comments are on the same level and both reply to what I quoted above. My point still stands: comprehension troubles. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 10:07 PM
5

It was in response to this: a person who effectively acts like someone/group [meaning women here] can do no wrong, will always take their side no matter what, let them walk all over them, etc. Typically in the hopes of getting some form of attention or affection in return. And it is pathetic. Not a single mention of gifts to friends though. Congratulations on your outstanding reading comprehension skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:46 PM
6

Where did I say it was so? Are you even trying to read what's said here?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:29 PM
1

No. You could be sexist in other ways but not be a simp: Treat men better than women — this is what I do, for example. I'm sexist but not a simp. Treat men and women equally but consider one sex less worthy than the other
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:12 PM
1

Sexist, yes. Not a simp, no. The two are not mutually exclusive. Simps are inherently sexist in showing preferential treatment towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:48 PM
1

If you were nicer to them than to your male coworkers for the sole reason of their sex, then you'd fit the definition. If not, then it was wrong to call you a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:32 PM
0

Showering women — who are not showing any interest in him — with attention and gifts, trying to impress, paying for onlyfans, "saving her", staying friendzoned, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:20 PM
6

That's a whiteknight, not a simp. A close, but a different pathetic semblance of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:19 PM
1

Yeah, I saw that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:41 PM
1

Nice one!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:32 PM
1

On the other hand, one of the benefits of participating in debates is learning how to structure your words, phrases, and sentences properly to avoid setting yourself up to not-so-constructive criticisms. So this also has a place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:57 PM
–

I'd take it way further. Betas and simps are the ones responsible for the whole shitshow that the modern women have become. If these "men" haven't showered non-interested women with attention and gifts and focused it on themselves and their bros, the world would be so so much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:54 PM
3

Fair enough, but in addition to failing to construct a meaningful first sentence she did not provide a single specific challenge to RP theories, just a bunch of generic old phrases. Even LLMs can criticise better these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:48 PM
1

Because these are the same thing. What makes someone a dumbass is a lack of willingness (or ability) to engage in an honest discussion and change their view if challenged with facts or logic that does not fit in their view of the world. And, as I said, apart from hardcore science, there is a significant dumbass population subscribing to any beliefs, feminism and RP absolutely alike. And you for some reason are quick to blame RP for its idiot followers but not do the same for feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:41 PM
1

Absolutely true and absolutely off topic. You still think that feminists are overwhelmingly this Being open to debate and challenge Which they are overwhelmingly not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:35 PM
0

You. feminists are open and willing to discussing how their individual views differ and change You just confidently stated that feminists, as a general population property, are willing to engage in constructive discussion with an open mind and change their opinion if the outcome of this discussion demands so. This suggests thinking of them as overwhelmingly open and intellectually honest people, doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:04 PM
2

feminists are open and willing to discussing how their individual views differ and change Yeah, that's an outright denial that there is a dumbass population among feminists as well. Thought so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:57 PM
2

Typical apex fallacy. Please refrain from discussions until you learn what it is and how to avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:42 PM
0

So what you're saying is there are multiple variations of feminism, so it is not tarnished by the idiots calling themselves feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:41 PM
0

observations are wrong It's hilarious how you managed to squeeze an impossible contradiction in your very first sentence. Yes, our eyes are lying to us. To so many men. Because you don't like what we see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:03 PM
2

while completely denouncing the inequality in men's favour That's not true, TRP says men start gaining the upper hand in their 30s. But until then, only the Chads have the upper hand, and average men are utterly disadvantaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:02 PM
2

Do you apply the same logic to feminism and feminists? Christianity and Christians? etc. And to expand wider, pretty much any belief system except hardcore science is going to have an overwhelmingly stupid follower base which is going to distort the initial teachings through their idiocy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 11:57 AM
5

Yes, you could also get hit by a bus when crossing a road. Bad events do happen. Does this mean you don't take actions to minimize the risks?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:49 AM
13

Look, as a man, there are only 2 things I actually cannot do without a woman: have sex and have children. Therefore, the primary parameters men evaluate women on are: The ability to generate sexual desire The ability to have healthy children The energy needed for the dreadful first 2-3 years of the child's life. Guess what, all of these peak in the 20s. For the RMV side, there also is going to be the ability to have a healthy relationship — i.e. Not being jaded due to having been burned by men N…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:17 PM
2

They’re one of the most common posters on relationship and abuse subs This is a pathetic lie. I just scrolled through these subs, and have not seen a single age gap post. Why don't you quit adjusting reality to your feelings and start adjusting your feelings to reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:59 PM
2

It most certainly did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:24 PM
2

Yeah, and how is this relevant to what we've been discussing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:21 PM
2

And you can try and produce an answer which is on the topic that the discussion was on, not on definition of words. Sidetracking: you get an A. Staying on the topic: F-.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:11 PM
4

These posts and the endless comments hating on age gap relationships are mostly done by moralists and older women, and their sole goal is to demoralise older men so they give up on the idea of getting with a young woman. Which is why "disregard the statistics, focus on your life, it is definitely possible" is a crucially important message for these men to see. Otherwise, it's just hate they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:06 PM
3

What does this even mean? My English is pretty good, but I'm lost here. Either this is something too subtle for me to understand, or this is something meaningless which people say when they have no real answer. TBH, looks more like the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:04 PM
3

So you decided all men who like young women are "predatory". And then, the next day you open reddit and spam "don't generalize", "women are not a monolith", etc. See the hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 06:35 PM
5

Well, here's the thing: these posts and the endless comments hating on age gap relationships are mostly done by moralists and older women, and their sole goal is to demoralise older men so they give up on the idea of getting with a young woman. Which is why "disregard the statistics, focus on your life, it is definitely possible" is a crucially important message for these men to see. Otherwise, it's just hate they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:58 PM
2

Who cares about "most relationships"? I care about building my own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:43 PM
0

Yet here I am at 40, dating a 19-yo (we started dating when she was 17), and having a few younger women being interested in me in my circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:12 PM
2

Based on cherry picked "evidence" from studies done on students of US universities interacting within their cohort and with university staff. Which couldn't be less representative of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:56 PM
1

Yeah, exactly. Your arguments are loaded. For example, trying to blame men for poor machine design. Newsflash: it's not "men" who design machines, engineering is a cushy job fully available to women. My girlfriend's grandmother was a machine designer. systemic oppression is not a man telling a woman "you don't deserve a raise because you are a woman" this is exactly what systemic oppression is. Sysemic oppression could be a male boss picking another man to be his confident, which would help him …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:23 AM
2

What I'm trying to say is get yourself just a little educated beyond feminist articles before debating an actual scientific topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:16 AM
2

Who is questioning its existence? It exists, yes, and the Nobel prize was given for the work showing that it exists for the sole reason that women work less and achieve less. Don't you understand the difference between "pay gap" and "discrimination"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:14 AM
2

These are questions that a poorly educated person with no economics degree would ask. With zero understanding of how proper scientific analysis is done.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:14 AM
5

The Nobel prize was given for the very thorough and meticulously controlled multivariate econometric analysis she and her co-researchers carried out which actually showed there is no discrimination whatsoever. Whenever men and women work the same time and achieve the same results, they get paid the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:12 AM
6

That's because "it's a rule" is a fairy tale libtards who've not seen how the world works tell themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:01 AM
12

I was red pilled from a very young age, when I saw my mother and her friends talk shit about their husbands who broke their backs providing for their families.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:49 PM
7

In fact, you're more likely to be racist the less you interact with minorities. This is very wrong. It worked exactly the opposite way on me. Having travelled the world made me very understanding of specifics of different ethnicities. And what lies behind stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:48 PM
1

How many women are in your circle? You are making a very strong claim: Out of your circle, no woman ever met a man whose mere presence immediately generated lust in her. This is very, very, very hard to believe. There are thousands of books and movies about love at first sight. Therefore, I have to make a conclusion that you're either an outlier or not being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 02:36 PM
1

Re-submitting, the automod really hates me. You really have a hard time admitting that women have agency and accountability, don't you? There's a universal rule in this world: accountability is the flip side of power. The power to choose your partner means you are accountable for the choices you make. The only women who are not accountable for their mate choice are the ones who never had the choice. Saudi Arabia or India, for example. risk awareness in decision-making places responsibility on vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 02:33 PM
–

They are never going to concede it. Their man-exploiting instincts prohibit them from even realising this behaviour and require them to delude themselves. Makes AF/BB and, ultimately, paternity frauds easier to pull off. Much easier to lie when you're deluding yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:32 PM
–

Yeah, the doctors are just being nice to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:35 PM
–

"love" is a word with about 10 different meanings, it's useless in proper debates unless you want to obscure your point. Now what you're trying to say is that commitment and fidelity are a choice. Sticking to your partner is a choice. Absolutely agree here. But it's much easier to keep committed if your partner actually arouses you. Not someone else. And it's not only about the risk of infidelity, it's about energy expenditure required to stay course.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:08 PM
0

That's a nice short circuit that applying just a tiny bit of logic to your words caused in your brain. You never intended to say it, but you actually said it, look here: Going by raw, animalistic desire is a great way to get used, robbed, r@ped or else. This means that if a woman does not want to "get used, robbed, r@ped or else", she should not choose men by following raw, animalistic desire. Which is another way of saying "choose better". But it's mansplaining, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:04 PM
–

Now it looks like you're confusing baseline libido (which I can agree, some women don't have) with sexual desire towards a specific person (which I actually was talking about above), aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:53 PM
–

Then why are you even here? The subject of sex clearly bothers you enough to motivate you to participate in these discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:43 PM
1

Yes, and it's a completely different story, which you would've known had you actually bothered to read relationship/MRP posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:42 PM
–

Of course not. Other men should be good obedient betas and provide for women who don't really want them. That's completely fine for me, the world will never run out of simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:00 PM
–

Yes, and many many women have no problem being instinctively aroused by threatening men because to the lizard brain "threatening" means "strong and good genes". Typical redditor "AKCHUALLY" :facepalm:
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:49 PM
–

There's no contradiction. I want her to be a slut for me but not for others. Women do this naturally for men their belly butterflies select, I simply want her to (1) have enough self-control to actually select and (2) select me. How's this so difficult to comprehend?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:44 PM
–

Slightly. Not anywhere near enough to prevent women from chasing losers, druggies, and abusers en masse, and then crying "victim blaming!" when they get burned and get told that it was their choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:43 PM
–

Are we plants, fungi, protozoans or bacteria then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:42 PM
-3

And yet, women here get offended and shriek "VICTIM BLAMING!!!" when they hear "choose better" which is essentially what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:41 PM
–

you’re a woman surrounded by women dude, how high are you? I'm a man. Just because it doesn’t happen in my circle, does that mean it doesn’t happen anywhere? That’s your logic. No, that's your logic. I have seen time and time again that there's not a single person whose behaviour is not impacted by their instinctive desires towards members of opposite sex. And it does so strongly. Some do have self-control to not fuck immediately, others don't. In all cases, desire is crucial. And yet here you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:38 PM
–

Are you saying you don’t agree with these or that you do? These are my general principles. I'm not going to ltr a slut. Neither a woman who's not eager to show her desire for me. I don't need her to actually do it quickly, but the desire must be visible from the first minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:35 PM
–

And you ended up in LTR’s with those women right? Most of them, yes. Some I met while I was in LTRs, and I had to decline. I don't get this idea that if a woman jumps you, she's not worthy. How it actually works for me: If she jumps others, then she's not worthy. If she doesn't jump me, she's not worthy. Not what you're trying to suggest. You didn’t pump and dump any of them. No. If she's dumpster material, I'm not fucking her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:04 PM
–

Great reading comprehension. It was 7 guys, each with a line of women eager to jump their bones. New women at any place. I don't think there's much to discuss if you can't even comprehend what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:00 PM
–

Good job deluding yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:28 AM
–

It’s really like you all see a couple of movie where a woman is ripping his clothes off to fuck and apply that to real life. No, we've seen how women behave next to men they are truly drawn to. I've known 7 of these dudes. Women don't care that most are losers, druggies or narcissists, they line up to fuck them the second they meet. Moreover, I've been this guy for several women as well. When she gets the belly butterflies, all this bs y'all talk about flies out the window. So no, it's you who h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:23 AM
–

Yet every healthy woman is capable of feeling strong sexual desire towards the right man. And instincts are stronger than emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:19 AM
–

want to build emotionally before getting physical This just means you have no raw animalistic desire towards the dude. What's going to happen when a guy who provokes this desire in you comes around?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:17 AM
–

This could become fully correct if amended with display of proper sexual desire towards you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:15 AM
1

you stated that dead bedrooms exist because of low libido I explicitly stated that I'm not talking about libido, didn't I? If you don't understand the difference between libido and sexual attraction towards a specific person, maybe you shouldn't be commenting on the reasons people have or don't have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:26 AM
1

Good job sidelining from my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:30 PM
1

And now you're mixing the baseline libido with sexual arousal towards another person, aren't you? You mean the former, I meant the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:47 PM
1

Thanks a lot for trying to understand. Glad that I was able to explain a bit. because that is 100% how I would never want to be treated. Especially by someone I am seriously dating. Yup, happened to me as well. But in other aspects — women love it when I'm being dominant and a bit violent, so I had to teach myself to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:42 PM
1

Fewer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:23 PM
0

You're so close to getting it. Men have almost exactly the same problem, but it's simply the flip side of it. Most of us have zero issues being seen or liked as a person, we need to ensure that we're being seen as a sexual object. Many RP dudes never had issues forming emotional connections, with men or women alike. It's just that with women, it always led to getting friendzoned. So they had to ensure that sexual attraction is there before establishing emotional intimacy. There's nothing evil in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:11 PM
2

Not relationships. Sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:42 AM
3

Why don't you link a highly upvoted (so you'd have an easier time finding one) TRP post / PPD post from a redpiller saying this?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:40 AM
0

Yes, because women line up to give all of these to Chad. I've met quite a few of these dudes. You just can't unsee it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:39 AM
1

This BP fairy tale is obnoxiously false. "Oh but RP is nothing but common advice with misogyny!" Why don't you link a mainstream place on the internet giving all this advice to men without "misogyny".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:36 AM
0

A lot of everyone need serious therapy FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:34 AM
2

Some do. I have a really wide and deep friend network with many emotional bonds. I don't need women for emotional bonding. I don't mind bonding / being vulnerable with women. It's nice to have, don't get me wrong. But sex comes first.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:34 AM
1

The effect of emotional bonding on the amount of sex is miniscule compared to the animalistic desire people get out of instinctive sexual arousal towards each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:31 AM
1

You can't just reduce love to a few tactics and strategies Of course you can. Unless it's sacred to you and your built-in moralism prevents you from recognising patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:28 AM
-1

So what the hell are late bloomers supposed to do? Accept that they'd have to date 30+ women and say goodbye to the chance of having healthy children? Yeah, no, that ain't happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:21 PM
2

Yeah, blue pillers have this tendency to have obnoxious moralism which hoards all their brain processing capacity, leaving nothing for reading comprehension or logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:39 AM
–

Dude, how high are you? Here it is, and it was /u/violentshallot, not me. And he was describing the mindset of a man, not an approach to treating a romantic partner. I really gotta have some of the shit you're smoking. Re-submitted with a np link because of the automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 02:00 PM
2

We do teach that at TRP. I have not seen feminists and blue pill women teach other women to not play dumb games.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 01:50 PM
1

Well maybe you should take your frustration to the women who demand this sort of behaviour from men and teach them to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 11:57 AM
1

Dude, are you fucking high? I googled it, and it was /u/violentshallot, not me. And he was describing the mental state of a man, not an approach to treating a romantic partner. I gotta have some of the shit you're smoking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:12 AM
0

Can you link it please? Because that's not me for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 10:58 PM
-2

Did I now? care to quote me?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:08 PM
7

Yeah, when I believed this BS, I had multiple women explain to me that it's not even close to truth, they want you to know which "no" is real and which is fake and push through the fake ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:03 PM
1

I have zero doubt that you have put enough effort into research in order to justify your hate towards white men. Hopefully, one day you're going to realize that it's humans in general and all demographics who are shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:47 PM
0

Ah, I get it, you're speaking in reverse so no one would suspect you of being politically incorrect! Yes, I do think so!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:34 PM
0

white ppl and murder... Boy you got that one wrong, lass.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:29 PM
0

Yup, pretty much the same deal as with muslims and terrorism. Or feminism and man haters. Or blue pillers and obnoxious moralism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 01:49 PM
2

Can't disagree with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:00 AM
1

Why are women still getting into relationships with guys that are roughly on the same level as them? If women have this supposed innate hypergamous desire? They take the best they can get. But they will be driven to upgrade. Many would cheat with Chad to get better genes, for example. Or leave once there's a richer potential husband. Why is it even relevant if men do the same thing? TRP was built for struggling men. It explains how women behave. I actually agree that parts of TRP could be said a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:51 PM
1

attracted to a man’s money or status genuinely They are not. They are driven to seduce, manipulate, and extract the resources (money or the status) from the man. It is not genuine desire. How have you managed to completely miss the point? It's not genuine sexual attraction, it's the desire to exploit the man's attraction to them for their benefit. Genuine attraction / AF: "I want his genes to grow in my belly" Fake attraction / BB: "I want his money / status, so I want to seduce him and exploit …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:31 PM
3

There's TRP, a bunch of observations about female behaviour combined with a toolkit to take advantage of them. Then, there's shit various people who identify as redpillers say. I can only vouch for the first. And the title of your post says "within RP", doesn't it? So I'm explaining how it does not exist within RP. Don't care about the second, that's very correct. Your entire "hypocrisy" point revolves around some "bbbut men too!" which could be a fair point on its own, and people identifying as…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:18 PM
3

Alright, so you're just looking to prove your opinion to yourself through parroting "hypocrisy" rather than learn. Fair enough, but don't call this a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:06 PM
8

In the 2014 version of TRP it was "looks, status, power, game". And I believe in what I've seen with my own eyes. Throughout my life, I've met 7 dudes who women lined up to fuck the second they met them: 4 were insanely handsome 1 had god-like charisma 1 was a narcissist, drug addict and a great manipulator (also quite handsome though) 1 was unhinged and had insane presence and power in any social setting And I've met quite a few men with money. This tells me what I need to know about what reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:16 PM
1

I have no idea what LMS stands for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:08 PM
2

This is much better, thanks. Let me help you clarify it: but men are not TRP does not speculate about male sexuality. Period. But this claim directly contradicts the concept of AF/BB. It does not. Hypergamy applies to both AF and BB. For AF, it means that she'd be instinctively chasing the mate with the best genes in her fertile times, and having the genuine desire for him. For BB, it means she's going to be instinctively looking for the most resourceful man in order to extract the resources out…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 09:58 PM
6

Redpillers see nothing wrong with men speaking about their partners that way Could you please link to where they do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 09:55 PM
1

You're not making a good job of pinpointing the contradiction. Could you be more concise? Reads like word salad more than a defined thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 09:17 PM
2

So what? I'm 40, past my manwhoring phase, and I don't want this shit in my relationships. Why would I be with someone talking to whom drains my brain energy? Even more, I call out the bullshit whenever other people start it, e.g. my father or my grandmother. You'd be surprised how much easier life becomes once you start doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 04:27 PM
3

While I agree, many women here would be very much against the first part.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:16 PM
2

Why don't you go over to /r/theotherwoman/ and see how sad it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 01:04 PM
1

that harms their relationships It doesn't. Instead, it weeds out immature people who are not ok with honesty and need sugarcoating and half lies. Don't want them in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:55 AM
6

So men are not required to be accepting women's boundaries of "I did anal with my ex but will not with you", correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:50 AM
1

That's a collection of random statements which have nothing to do with what I've been saying. We're done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 10:24 PM
1

You appear to be confusing to distinctively different situations. Situation 1: a man who gets female attention, but does not pay attention to other women beyond what's socially acceptable. Situation 2: a man who gets female attention and does spend his time and effort on other women. I'm talking about situation 1. You keep talking about number 2. See the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:55 PM
1

Yeah, a nice blue pill fairy tale which barely links to reality. Women want a man who is desired by other women and who is choosing her because she's making herself worthy. Not because he's desperate and has no options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:48 PM
1

So over and over again, people here don't differentiate between sexual attraction and relationship attraction, and then blame others for mixing them up. How about you start by separating the two?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:03 PM
5

Then it's an advice on how to ruin the relationship. You should know precisely how much attention your GF needs, and give around that amount. Not "all their attention". If you do that, your attention quickly starts to devalue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:27 PM
3

Of course, you're wise, you can see through all RP tricks, and this would never work on you. Glad that you've transcended your instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:21 AM
9

When in reality they should give all their attention to them This is a friend zone speedrun guide. Thank for proving the OP's point. Women do give horrible dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:20 AM
1

it's better that the girl not know about them Once you attract enough women, your behaviour changes, and it alone will be demonstrating that you have options without rubbing it into anybody's face. And women are drawn to it like moths to fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:17 AM
2

Who said anything about rubbing it in her face?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:38 PM
-1

Yeah I agree that you should have some sense in applying the tools properly. Was just trying to remark that applying this to low quality women can score you a good woman provided you know how to deal with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:30 PM
-2

but this will not hold onto an actual good woman Yeah, but then actual good women are going to see how well this works on not-so-high-quality women, and feel attracted through pre-selection. They are women as well, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:04 PM
17

Then by your logic, ugly women should give good advice from the get go, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 05:41 PM
7

It's menopause, when their man exploiting instincts shut down.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:38 PM
1

Don't Olympic champions have trainers?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:35 PM
32

This is true for women in the dating market. There was this great comment by /u/shmupsy: if a woman is out there looking for the best guy she can find, why would she muddy her pool by giving a struggling guy tips on how to get in there? And to be honest, there's not much to add for this demographic. But — and this is important — post-menopausal women do give good advice. My grandmother told me several times to be careful with marriage as it will determine a lot in my life. And I've had advice of…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:26 PM
-1

I'd jump off a bridge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 05:35 PM
–

That's because your only visible goal in this argument is to throw shit at me and the manosphere, and not to learn. Had it been the other way around, I would've been happy to explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 04:13 PM
–

You clearly are intentionally playing dumb, pretending to be obtuse, and demanding some sort of machine-ready algorithm where there could be one, but it's not needed for anyone but you. As is your right, but do not expect any further engagement from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:54 PM
3

I asked YOU what HVM means I have not ever used this term outside of laughing at FDS, and I do not intend to. Therefore, to me, it means nothing. ok so how would one measure the number of humans sexually drawn to them? "Here's one. There's another one, this makes two. Oh, now there's three." Seriously, have you never seen humans become aroused by a member of the opposite sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:31 PM
3

So what does HVM mean. Have you not read my comment? In FDS, it means a rich simp. In the manosphere, it is meaningless, as there is no singular value. Also how does one calculate out SMV? You could do a mathematical formula, but that's beyond the scope of this post. The idea is measuring the number of humans of the opposite sex who are sexually drawn to the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:26 PM
4

"High value man" as a term was invented by FDS. It means a rich simp. The manosphere, especially RP, states that there's no singular value when it comes to dating and relationships. At the very least, there are SMV and RMV. The ability to generate arousal in the other sex, and the desirability for a relationship, respectively. So, clearly, you have no idea of even the basic RP concepts — therefore, the ideas are meaningless to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:16 PM
5

Also, valuing yourself and kicking the woman out at the first sign of entitlement and ingratitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:48 AM
7

Yup. Fully agree here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:17 PM
1

"Don't simp" is even shorter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:41 PM
2

I'm having a hard time comprehending this. I'm going to try to respond nevertheless. Time for a lesson in basic biology, which, apparently, you've been skipping since middle school: there are no men or women when it comes to instincts and instinctive behaviour. There are male instincts and female instincts. And not a single human is in control of their instincts. They (some of them, anyway) can only control their actions. These are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:34 PM
3

You're sidelining hard. This comment has nothing to do with RP or anything I've been saying. And describing the instinctive female behaviour is not "blaming".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:58 PM
3

Whatever you say, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:55 PM
3

single=deserves to be single (because they are offensive) This is exactly what she's trying to state.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:20 PM
6

Yes, my "just world fallacy" referred to her first sentence. You can't really debate the second one, can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:59 PM
4

Just world fallacy at its finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:58 AM
8

Are you trolling? you were saying in the other chain that RP was wrong because "redpillers are single". Yet here you are, agreeing with its core.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:57 AM
8

See, that's a staple RP point you just agreed with. But it's so wrong about female instinctive behaviour!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:42 AM
2

"I don't like what redpillers are saying about women, therefore, RP must must must please just agree with me that it's wrong!"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:40 AM
8

change their minds and grow Which somehow without fail happens to coincide with becoming single mothers or hitting an age where childbearing becomes a lottery. Oh, and with a hugely grown list of demands from a potential partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:37 AM
7

The pseudo logic in your comment is just awesome. Let me show it in full clarity: RP men are choosing to not betabux. RP helped them not fall prey to the disgusting female game of extracting resources and commitment in exchange for crumbs of pussy. Therefore, RP must be wrong. Well done, bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:32 AM
13

Not a single person on this planet can view others' experiences on par with their own, let alone another a whole other sex. That being said, RP comes from observable behaviour, and it's damn well predictive when it comes to human female mating instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:03 AM
–

I would agree that this is one of the leading reasons, but it's far from the only one. I, for one, struggled in my youth with a perfectly healthy weight. For a plethora of other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 08:55 PM
1

I just linked a few studies showing that overparenting harms kids, and a good marital relationship is best for them. So no, you're wrong. Kids come second.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 08:46 PM
2

You must have been living under a rock for the past 40 years. The 80's pressure for perfect parenting destroyed so many families and kids. A mother that hyperfocuses on the kids and lets the marital relationship deteriorate. A father that ignores it because "she's a great mother". It's a super common story. Here's a few: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39760739/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09581596.2019.1690632 On the other hand, marital satisfaction is well established to predi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 08:17 PM
1

You seem to not fully understand the difference between first priority and high priority. Healthy first priority is having a good life for yourself and for the family, and that includes working on the marriage and having life outside of the kids. Hyperfocusing on the kids and making them first priority is so known for destroying that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 07:19 PM
2

Yeah, because helicopter parenting is so so healthy. Don't you understand the difference between high priority and first priority?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 07:03 PM
6

However, it's absolutely evil for a man to want kids and then NOT make those kids a first priority BS. Making your life centered on children is a surefire way to screw up your life, your marriage, and, consequently (and ironically), the kids. The healthy way to grow kids is to assign them high priority, but not overdo it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:59 PM
5

Why don't you link a mainstream place where it's "universal advice", preferably, earlier than late 2010s, when RP went viral. Your blue pill game of "yeah RP is just mainstream advice + misogyny" is BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 06:09 PM
0

Also a virtue signalling problem, but from reddit admins.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 12:23 AM
1

I categorise words as actions, nevertheless I absolutely agree with the first part. But "advertising desires" is a meaningless phrase. Again, no one chooses what they are attracted to, and no amount of advertising can change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:02 PM
-1

it's a moral problem if they are It's your moral problem if they are. For any sane person, it's not. No one can change what arouses them. The only moral problem is people's actions, not their desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:55 PM
4

Blue eyes, long hair, big boobs, slim waist, good smell, pretty face. But I'm not in that 90%, I think virtue signalling is cancer. And this is a bad example. Here's a good one: Should you ask a redditor if he finds 17-year-olds sexually attractive, you're going to get a ton of dishonest answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 02:41 PM
-2

Top tier IQ men are likely to be neurodivergent, and therefore likely to end up on RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 02:22 PM
18

we generally don't try to go with any virtue signaling Reminder: you're on reddit, virtue signalling is the default for 90% of local population.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 02:18 PM
–

I'm his copy. We also share quite a few mutations. But it only became apparent by the time I've hit 15 or so. And then again, I could be his father's son — there's no way to know. At any rate, any such claim in pregnancy or during the infancy has zero foundations lacking a genetic test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:00 PM
–

For example, a person might tell their wife that the heater is broken, but in reality they just had the thermostat on the wrong setting Yes, because they did not know. The woman in question is knowingly choosing to not disclose critically important details. you're trying to upgrade instances where women are wrong into instances where they are trying to trick someone And you're trying to downgrade purposeful omission of crucial details into an innocent mistake, aren't you? I am showing you someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:47 PM
–

There is uncertainty which she is absolutely aware of, yet she makes a decision to make a definitive claim. And to conceal this uncertainty. And you are trying so hard to call it a "mistake". No, it's a calculated decision, and it's fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:35 PM
0

I agree with the govt. enabled parasitism, but simping is a huge issue nevertheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:34 PM
–

No, that was pure logic. There is uncertainty which she is absolutely aware of, yet she makes a decision to make a definitive claim. And to conceal this uncertainty. Any reasoning behind this besides not being aware of having sex with other men makes it a fraud. Your emotional difficulties with women Please quit personal attacks, you don't get any extra points for doing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:33 PM
0

No more simping. Which is the root cause of most shitty behaviour by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:25 PM
–

Relationship or not, when there has had been sex with multiple men, any "you are the father" statement is a lie in absence of DNA testing because in our universe there are exactly zero ways to know for certain. And your entire argument base revolves around "but she thought otherwise". You surely don't see a problem with this line of thinking? Any definitive claim of fatherhood is a lie in this situation, and an intended one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:16 PM
–

Outside of DNA tests, there are zero ways of knowing who the father is. Any statement assigning 100% paternity to one person is certainly a lie in such situation. And an intended one. Hence, an intent to misrepresent paternity. A fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:08 PM
–

Outside of DNA tests, there are zero ways of knowing who the father is. Any statement assigning 100% paternity to one person should be considered a lie in such situation. And an intended one. Hence, an intent to misrepresent paternity. A fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:05 PM
–

So what you're saying is cheaters should be able to lie about paternity and not be held accountable for it because what goes on in their heads absolves them of any accountability? And it's my logic that's intellectually challenged, heh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:02 PM
–

So you're saying that a person should be able to evade criminal charges just by deluding themselves that they've done nothing wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 04:59 PM
–

So you're saying that a person should be able to evade criminal charges just by having faulty assumptions? Especially for betraying those closest to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 04:58 PM
–

Having sex with other men (except non-consensual sex) requires intent. Failing to inform the supposed father that she had sex with other men when announcing fatherhood requires intent. It is a clear indication of having intent to commit fraud in the question of paternity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:14 PM
–

The intent argument is weak at best. Having sex with the rare exception of non-consensual sex requires intent. Concealing the fact of having sex with other men when announcing fatherhood is also an obvious proof of intent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:12 PM
1

Hunger does not destroy your mental health.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 06:42 PM
9

Yeah, it's like air or money. Your life is not about it unless you don't get any. So just fuck poor people, they are missing out on so much, am I right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 08:24 PM
1

There are countless claims from women here on PPD that casual sex is not a reward. You appear to have missed a critical part of my original comment. Please challenge it properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:21 PM
1

Like seriously, lol, that’s about half of what red pill does— preach women’s inner thoughts that they made up inside their heads. We talk about female behaviour and underlying instincts. Not about their thoughts. These are a mess anyway. I know they look similar, but there is a significant difference. If a man whines and belly-aches about now marriage is horrible for men, he is not lying. It's horrible because of anti-male cultural and legal landscapes. He is literally telling you just how much …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 06:45 PM
1

What a nice, thought through, nuanced, and substantiated argument you've made. Always glad to have a fruitful and challenging discussion!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 05:53 PM
0

This is a significant amount of thoughts you're attributing to insides of men's heads where you've never been. Especially in terms of "will hate". Any observable actions that actually prove this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 04:52 PM
-2

Where did you get this notion that the majority of men settle and then resent their wives? It is fairly common in broken women, but not at all in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 03:56 PM
5

No, they go around and give the hot sexy girls all their attention and lust and adoration and genuine desire. Which they claim to hate. Unless it comes from desirable men, of course. The “reward” those guys save for boring family minded “good girls” is that she has to do all the laundry and cooking for him for him to tolerate her presence. Bad boomer generalisation. A whole lot of young men today think casual sex is the ultimate most wondeful thing For men, it is. For women, again, I see daily c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 03:17 PM
13

There are countless claims from women here on PPD that casual sex is not a reward. Marriage and family, on the contrary, are. And guess what, men do reward the family minded women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 01:01 PM
6

This needs to be a separate post.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:05 PM
0

“Beta bux” describes a guy who provides for a woman which has zero desire for him because Chad left a forever lasting impression on her. And it is the wrong way to have a family. The right way is complicated and difficult, and it requires being family minded yourself and finding a family minded partner who is capable of both providing and generating desire. Among other compatibility factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 11:04 PM
-2

This is for them to decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:46 PM
-5

for everything For their mate choice mainly. Motherhood is an insane level of responsibility, yet so many women choose men to reproduce with using vagina tingles. This is the key problem. Others pale in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:17 PM
-8

It allows women to get high by looking at the child or hearing their voice for the remainder of their lives. Certainly worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:09 PM
1

I am empathetic. My beef is with your point that it's only women who know how it is to fear the opposite sex en masse and victimising the entire sex. This is just not true. A small minority of shite men instills fear in young girls on the street, having disproportionate access to the street. A small minority of shite women instills fear in young boys domestically, having disproportionate access to custody. Also, how many women have had their asses actually kicked by youth gangs? Many many men ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 03:46 PM
-1

Appreciate being open minded! However, as a victim of "non-severe" physical abuse my mother, I have to disagree. It certainly does instill fear of women in a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 03:36 PM
-1

Feels before realz, eh? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249715381_The_Relative_Extent_of_Physical_Punishment_and_Abuse_by_Mothers_and_Fathers Essentially, the aggregate of data shows that women are significantly more likely to commit physical punishment (e.g. smacking) than men. When controlled for the primary parent, this rate is more or less equal. But given that children nearly always are given to mothers, this means that the raw rate is way higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 03:03 PM
-1

Oh, so women don't beat their children?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:32 PM
8

This stems from having no idea how any of it works. If she is viscerally attracted to the dude, a museum, or even a dumpster diving session is going to be just fine. If she's not, dating her is going to be an unwinnable war of "pleasing the lady".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:24 PM
20

/r/DeadBedrooms
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:20 PM
7

if a woman is out there looking for the best guy she can find, why would she muddy her pool by giving a struggling guy tips on how to get in there? Brutal and honest. The most truthful response here.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:41 PM
7

None of my close friends are at that level of attractiveness. Appreciate the sarcasm, but it's not really relevant. ADDED: the few handsome dudes that I do know and that get all the sexual attention are either losers or narcissists. Women don't care, they line up anyway. And I never said that it's casual sex that screws someone up. I'd rather claim the opposite: I've yet to meet a wholesome mentally healthy person who'd be having it. It's always broken people of both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 08:39 PM
7

What a nice twist you've applied to my words. So much for arguing in good faith. I'm speaking from both personal experience and having looked at the science which was already linked in this thread. advocating I'm not advocating. Every single person is free to do whatever the hell they want to. I'm merely stating the timeless observation: sluts make bad wives. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:35 PM
4

You are very, very wrong. But no one can explain it to you. It is going to take time for you to see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:29 PM
9

"There is no morality" does not mean "it's not moral". It means that the RP does not operate in morals because it's a flawed way to view the world. It only cares about practical advice. Which is: if you wife up a slut, you're in for a bad time. Now I don't date men, so I in practice don't care about male sluts. But I do have some empathy for women, so I'd say yes, male sluts would also make for bad husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:24 PM
5

Typical apex fallacy, isn't it? I'm not going to argue if you can't even fathom how narrow-minded this line of thinking is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:23 PM
5

Yes. For thousands of years, only the nobility was not oppressed. The rest were serfs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:17 PM
7

There is no morality there. Former sluts make bad wives, that's an observational fact. Now whether it's because they were broken to start with or it was the slutting that broke them — this could be debated but it's not really important in choosing your lifetime partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:10 PM
-1

Could be a comforting lie for someone who does nothing with his life. Worked for me though. Each decade added more success with women (of all ages below me). But it requires putting in the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:00 PM
47

That's only one element of success taught by the RP — and not the first one to chase. It's difficult to behave as the prize when you're skinnyfat, dressed poorly, slouching, and have poor social skills and low testosterone. Fake it till you make it, yes, but putting in the work is still an unskippable step that precedes becoming the prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:45 PM
8

on top of that, i haven’t placed any blame on men, so how exactly is this “politically charged?” Oh boy, where do I even start. Ok, let's assume you're arguing in good faith. So I'll try and show you: plenty of women don’t realized they’re queer until later in life, often dating men before that How's that not applicable to gay men? You're making this claim in order to paint women as special snowflakes and blame their male exes for the DV. Once you look at the broad picture and include the statis…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 12:07 AM
4

But it was. Look at your last sentence, you managed to squeeze "man bad" in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 11:58 PM
–

The whole point
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 11:24 PM
3

You're sidelining hard and now even confusing your facts. Dv stats is high among gay men No, it's exactly the opposite. Go read the study before making untruthful claims. What’s your point ? What was your point in saying the world was hostile to mothers? It's simply untrue. Having kids is a normal wish for both men and women, it's how we procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 11:20 PM
8

While I agree that the lesbian side could be open to interpretation, you're conveniently omitting the gay side. The fact remains simple: the second there are no women, both DV and divorce rates plummet. And yet, you're happy to do lengthy mental gymnastics to absolve women of any accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 11:16 PM
–

And yet, the fact remains the same: the second you remove women from the relationship, both the DV and the divorce rate plummet. So much mental gymnastics just to relieve women of any accountability. You deserve a medal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 11:13 PM
6

You're very talented at mixing truth with BS. Let's separate it! Women's default is to be in relationship. Men default is to fuck around. This is a very strong claim with nothing to back it up. Plenty of women are happy to chase Chad or to imagine themselves in a relationship while being in Chad's fuckzone. Plenty of men are really happy to be committed, yet many don't get this option. You probably are thinking about the top 1% who have their pick and can afford to fuck around. Classic apex fall…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 10:59 PM
2

Intergender dynamics are difference than intragend dynamics Agree here whatever’s going on in lgbtq relationships is irrelevant for the straight discussion Hard disagree. It's still women who are crazier simply due to higher estradiol levels, social media and lack of accountability. Still very very relevant. That being said, if men find women exhausting, they can stop dating them. Most of us want kids. And mentally healthy ones too, which means we want a healthy relationship with the potential m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 10:35 PM
6

And yet, gay divorce and DV rates are way lower than straight. Again, not even touching lesbians, this is an its own separate batshit crazy league.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 10:29 PM
16

Yeah, that's why gay relationships are way more stable and less violent than straight ones. And don't even start about lesbians. Quit this BS, please. It's women who are exhausting to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 10:15 PM
3

Agree, but if I had to allocate the responsibility for the damage, it would be 70-30.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:30 PM
3

And by yours — it was her responsibility to fix herself before having kids. Which she failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:29 PM
6

Yeah, I did just that. Took responsibility and spent many years in order to recover. How exactly does it change the guilty parties? You do realise that damage is usually caused and fixed by different actors?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:23 PM
7

My mother ruined his mental health as well. Narcissists do that. I got extremely lucky to recover. He is still lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:29 PM
4

views his lack of experience as women’s fault in any way What if it's specific women's fault? For me, it was my mother and the head teacher of my class who destroyed my self-esteem and mental health which took me until 27 to recover and become able to form relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:07 AM
2

There are plenty indecent men too, of course. I don't think there's a single syllable in my above comment suggesting that men are saints. It's so lame when someone adds an imaginary detail to someone else's thought and then gets offended by that exact imaginary detail, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:59 AM
–

Surprise-surprise!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:52 PM
–

Whatever you say. If your moral compass says that I have to date 30+ women with baggage, wrinkles and other dudes' kids to not be called a creep — then I'm happy to cause an outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:29 PM
–

Meh. Feel free to date expired women if that's not an "ew" thing for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:43 PM
1

There is a dictionary definition, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 04:40 PM
-1

Age of consent is 16 where we live. An LTR is not a legal contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 04:35 PM
7

Yeah, it's deeply unsettling for a woman if a man wants her to be decent and loyal. That's an unattainable level for about 2/3rds of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 03:09 PM
-3

Thanks mate!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 01:25 PM
-3

Took 10 years of work to get there. And hard stuff like r/consulting, GLP-1s, and r/steroids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 01:02 PM
1

Took me 10 years of work to get there. And hard stuff like /r/consulting, GLP-1s, and /r/steroids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 01:01 PM
-9

40M in an LTR with 19F. As red as it gets, though I have a slightly nuanced view: what RP attributes to all women, I attribute to female reproductive instincts, and those vary by intensity from one woman to another.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:44 PM
9

Blue pill women tend to insult those who see them for who they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 08:34 PM
–

No, the point of this thread is to assess how much awareness (not even talking about empathy) women of PPD have about men's issues in marriage. As the comments expectedly show, zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:12 PM
–

ITT: women have zero idea. Shows how much they care about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:09 PM
–

You clearly have no idea what "care" means in a romantic context. Please avoid participating in nuanced discussions until you learn the meaning of words in different contexts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:07 AM
2

I can. I know it seems like a weird concept for many people, especially those struggling to feel gratitude. These people are usually entitled. Let me provide a few examples: I am grateful to my govt. for giving me a free and good education. I hate it otherwise (I'm Russian for the record). I am grateful to my boss at my last job for sticking up for me. I respect him, but I don't care about him otherwise. I am grateful to several youtube content creators because they changed my life. Do you reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:29 AM
2

The OP was about romantic indifference, not ingratitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 10:31 PM
4

Yes. Long-lasting and successful relationships are not built on love, they are built on gratitude to each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:40 AM
2

That's a nice twist you've applied to my words. Instead of trying to honestly answer, you just spew accusations. Of course, I see both categories of women in life. Where I was leading is that the women who complain about men objectivising them tend to be in the latter category. Objectivising themselves and not having anything interesting in their lives but a thousand instagram photos of their assets. I myself do have girl friends. Who do have hobbies and empathy for men. Guess what: they are not…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:23 PM
-1

women wanting legitimate friendships That's a malicious lie women keep telling themselves and everyone around. Let me shed some light: What to do if you're a woman who genuinely wants legitimate friendships with men Develop interests in life not revolving around social media, male attention, or kids Be an interesting companion Don't focus your life around your sexuality Be empathetic towards men you meet What to do if you're a woman who wants to friendzone men Focus your life around social media…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:16 PM
1

The only issue is that the dude who does not generate any stomach butterflies dares to express romantic interest. All the rest is BS post-factum rationalisations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:06 AM
-1

How it reads after establishing a lack of reciprocity is of zero concern to the guy, which is, again, a perfectly reasonable position.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:04 AM
4

Whatever you say, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:13 PM
6

An awesome self-contradictory comment! You go girl! Of course, it does exist. And while I agree that it's the dude's responsibility to not get trapped there, I cannot honestly say that women are not actively doing shit to set this trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:07 PM
7

Highly classified incel science files.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:59 PM
7

You must be from some other planet. On the planet where I live, women have this instinct of exploiting their sexuality in order to extract time, attention and, ultimately, resources from men. Friendzoning them is one of the ways to do this. And pedalling the "get to know us as a person and develop an emotional connection first" BS is one of the ways to convince the dumb simps to get trapped there. And then they get angry when the dude smartens up and leaves. Don't play dumb, we have the disgusti…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:55 PM
10

This is a different — though, maliciously distorted to absolve women of any accountability — wording of the same BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:45 PM
1

This is a different wording of the same BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:44 PM
9

That doesn't mean lie to be their friends. Another gaslighting attempt. Being interested in a gal both as a person and as a romantic partner and not wanting to be friendzoned at the same time is a perfectly honest and reasonable position. Women only call it a lie because they would like to keep dudes in the friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:42 PM
1

That doesn't mean lie to be their friends. Another gaslighting attempt. Being interested in a gal both as a person and as a romantic partner and not wanting to be friendzoned is a perfectly honest and reasonable position. Women only call it a lie because they would like to keep dudes in the friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:42 PM
34

Aren't women the ones pedalling "get to know us as a person and develop an emotional connection first" BS endlessly? And then getting angry when men do just that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 02:53 PM
1

>Turns out being single is OK Yeah, up to the point where their children end up not having a father and it screws them up for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 11:18 AM
–

Women are conditioned by mother nature (or, in other words, evolved) to not recognise the feeling of lust and confuse it with being interested in a man's resources/status/etc. — and only a truly rare and self-consciuos woman would be able to detect it. Makes it easier to deceive and manipulate men, which is at the core of female reproductive instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:57 PM
–

women generally don't chase men But they do. Oh, they do. Pick any random woman and get her to talk. You're going to hear all about her past crush or two and how she chased them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:52 PM
1

There is a huge dissociation between the title and the body of the post. The title is extremely well said, but the body has jack to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:08 PM
1

When a woman is interested, she sure as hell is going to let you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:27 AM
2

I'd even go as far as saying 2-3 hrs online or 15 min in person is more than enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 08:37 AM
6

It's a vetting or picking or ignoring red flags issue. Aren't these a part of personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 11:01 AM
1

It's a vetting or picking or ignoring red flags issue. Aren't these a part of personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 11:00 AM
14

>they also don’t have the responsibilities But they do. Male taxpayers fund the welfare and other niceties for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:42 PM
1

they also don’t have the responsibilities But they do. Single men are mainly the taxpayers funding the welfare, and women are net receivers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:40 PM
–

Women are perfectly fine with being treated like sex objects by men they strongly desire. Don't lie to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:25 PM
1

Women are perfectly fine with being treated like sex objects by men they strongly desire. Don't lie to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:20 PM
5

The whole point of being “a good person” is that you are good IN SPITE of how others treat you. If you do it only because you want the same back, then you aren’t good, you are transactional. You're not describing a good person. You're describing a doormat simp who's going to be used time and time again. Of course, being good involves having boundaries and not letting people abuse your kindness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 06:01 PM
12

"Know your worth" is pretty much always about selecting a man with money, never about finding one who's a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:26 AM
13

How's this of any relevance to the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:26 AM
1

No, I claimed that women are incapable of friendship. Uniting together in face of hardship is not friendship, it's collaboration. And, again, women cannot be friends with men. There always is an underlying motive — could be from either side, but there's always one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 09:20 AM
3

Every woman out there knows about how women will look out for each other and form strong bonds Oh, so now you're admitting it's only for other women? The intellectual dishonesty is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 01:44 PM
2

Women do favors for men all the time when they are friends. Haven't seen it once in my life. Women are incapable of friendship, especially with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 10:30 AM
–

This requires some brain power and intellectual honesty as well. As you can see, bloops tend to lack in both.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:48 PM
–

Yes, because most male bloops have had sexual success from the young age and never had the need to go down the rabbit hole of studying how all this crap works in order to become successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 11:34 AM
1

Yes, it's not only the number, but their youth and attractiveness. And it's not the number itself, but the ability to have it. Doesn't change my previous comment one bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:45 PM
1

And now you're lumping together "have sex" and "enjoyed plenty of women in their teens and 20s", aren't you? Please, by your own words you're in top 1% men in terms of sexual success. Of course, you really can't see the issues of averagely successful men or below that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 12:33 PM
–

Good for you. Now can you imagine that an insane amount of men haven't had this luck?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:23 PM
–

Yeah, this was a case demonstrating that "didn't sleep with you earlier" can be offensive in certain scenarios. Nevertheless, marrying a woman in her 30s is a shitty deal, assuming you're going to stay with her for a long time. You don't get to enjoy her youth but you still have to be with her when she's old. Recognising and refusing shitty deals is a measure of self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:26 PM
0

Seems like automod deletes my comments for some reason. Copying: There might be 2 different situations buried here. What you're telling is only part of the story. Does she say she wishes you'd met earlier? For example, my last GF told me, "I wouldn't had looked at you when I was 17" — with a subtext that she didn't consider me worthy of her young love. Which was an insane offense, it ended up causing me a ton of pain and eventually me dumping her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:37 PM
1

You're confusing 2 different situations. What you're telling is only part of the story. Does she say she wishes you'd met earlier? For example, my last GF told me, "I wouldn't have looked at you when I was 17" — with a subtext that she didn't consider me worthy of her young love. Which was an insane offense, it ended up causing me a ton of pain an me dumping her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 08:17 AM
11

Who's threatening with it? It's simply a self-respect measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:33 PM
1

It's both, really. Personally, I've seen my mother and her friends discuss this endlessly, I've seen my grandmother do it, my classmates in middle schools, in university, and then in dating life as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:30 AM
2

I'm mumbling about that issue where an average woman's ability to bear a healthy child starts abruptly going downhill after 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:25 PM
2

That's a pile of barely coherent sentences denying what anyone with a pair of eyes sees daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 11:38 AM
1

Not consciously, but that's exactly how the male reproductive instinct works. It's been diluted through tens of thousands years of civilization, but it's still there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:49 AM
4

My libido is problematic, I maybe orgasm 1/3rd of the time. I still love sex and have it any chance my brain turns this part on.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:46 AM
2

So 12 years less to produce healthy children, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:36 AM
2

Men aren’t a resource Women have this instinct of monetizing or otherwise exploiting men's desire towards them. So while you say otherwise, instinctively many, many women do consider men to be a resourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:28 AM
–

Turning 40 in a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:43 PM
–

Mine's 18, so no. She gave me what no other women did — her young love, her prime years. And she's willing to reject the female instincts in order to build the relationship, which is so so extremely rare nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:03 PM
1

Yeah, it's like none of the commenters has ever watched it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:58 AM
1

Somewhat, but not entirely. I did not consider myself a man in my early 20s when I used to simp. Nor do I consider now that I was a man back then. I was a boy. You forgot that people change. However, I was referring to the subject of this post, and not to your snide remark. Males are prone to this behaviour, I agree. But see above.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 06:26 PM
1

However, it still matters. Men recognise this behaviour in themselves and other men, and call them out on it. Because most men understand that it's unhealthy. None of which can be said about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 04:03 PM
1

Getting rid of pink glasses is a respectful move. That's all there is to it. Of course, it's best to recognize that most people have bad sides, men and women alike, but that's at least a start.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:50 AM
3

Most men don't consider simps men. Women too, for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:40 AM
1

Yeah, there are terms for this phenomenon. It's called simping, being spineless or pussy-whipped, and it's not respected at all. Men are calling other men out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:35 AM
1

Nah, it's the other way around. Once I got in a high quality relationship, the miseries of modern age dating stopped being of any importance to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 09:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter