TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PlebbitBot9000 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by PlebbitBot9000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

It's the fact that if every single woman has experienced some creepy man being attracted to them when they were very young, then it's not a rare predilection within the male adult population. This doesn't make any sense. It could be that a small minority of men commit a majority of sex offenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 02:17 AM
7

I don't have to guess, it's 81% of women and 43% of men report experiencing some form of sexual harassment and/or assault lifetime in the US. Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 05:25 PM
17

Crime statistics are only one aspect of why women mistrust men Moving the goalpost. Are we talking about whether crime statistics are relevant to whether it's valid to hate an entire demographic, or not? You've offered zero refutation to my previous point on the topic. As to the remainder of your list of grievances with the male species, to the extent that it's topically relevant to this post, I'll say: Acting like every male you meet is a predator until proven otherwise is not only inaccurate b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 02:39 PM
21

Proponents often claim man-hate is justified. And to be honest, the statistics don't lie: men do the most crimes and are statistically women's biggest threat. Hmm, so sounds like some people are suggesting that it's valid to hate some groups because they're overrepresented in crime statistics. I wonder what other groups that could apply to. Instead, maybe it would be wise to treat each other as individuals and remember that there is more variation within groups than between them. To answer your …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 01:49 PM
13

90% men below 25 Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 12:40 AM
0

Ad hominem. Please engage the argument rather than the identity of the author.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 03:30 PM
1

Humans are absolutely hormones and boners, at least primarily. The only reason you exist is because of millions of years of evolution where primal sex drive was a key fitness attribute. It is impossible to underestimate the importance of evolutionary influences on your own cognition, and it's foolish to think of yourself as so civilized as to be immune from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 07:28 PM
5

I'm not sure there is such a thing as a fully "normal" dating experience in 2022. Young people today are guinea pigs for so many new developments in the game. OLD / social media have barely been around for ten years but are now a dominant force in the dating market. MeToo / feminism is increasingly pathologizing many previously socially acceptable dating rituals, e.g. cold approach is basically dead at this point. So in short, we're living in a world that no other generation would remotely recog…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 06:30 PM
9

Yeah I can relate to this. I feel like women often leverage the sexual leeway they have in conversations (e.g. can ask how big your dick is with impunity). They usually back off when you challenge it and show you’re willing to match their energy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:32 PM
4

Food $200 Data $150 Rent $800 Candles $3,600 Utility $150
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 11:41 PM
6

In the UK heterosexual people have official surpassed gay folks in having more cases of HIV. Note that's in terms of absolute numbers. The article says: "Half of all new HIV diagnoses were in heterosexuals (49%) in England in 2020, compared to 45% in gay and bisexual men." This would still mean that gay and bisexual men are far more likely to have HIV than non gay or bisexual men. Furthermore, MSM account for 71% of new HIV diagnoses in the US (source). This is despite MSM comprising less than 6…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 05:31 PM
4

100% this. Ironic how bluepillers will infinitely lecture about how incels aren’t entitled to sex, but when the shoe is on the other foot, they shriek.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 02:59 PM
5

How the hell is it homophobic to not want to sleep with a group that has a markedly higher rate of STDs? Nobody is obligated to sleep with anyone else. If you believe otherwise, you might be an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 02:57 PM
13

This is a non-argument. Study after study show the importance of both height and facial symmetry in attraction. See r/BlackPillScience Please provide evidence that “most men of average attractiveness and average height are dating or in relationships.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 10:57 PM
5

If you asked 100 single men if they were willing bang; no strings attached; you’d get a pretty clear answer. Count me out. IME having sex with a random is almost always mid, even when horny. I definitely remember feeling this way when I was 16 and had no experience, but I feel as though you quickly find out that baseline sex is not that good, and certainly not good enough from a cost/benefit analysis standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 02:30 AM
5

Ice cold take. Studies overwhelmingly show that attraction is dictated by things like facial symmetry and height, which men have no control over. See r/BlackPillScience
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 02:30 PM
2

I agree. An important part of maturity is realizing that many people (if not most) have no issue being dishonest with you to further their own goals. There's no more frustrating feeling in the world than trying to be straight with someone who is not being straight with you in return. Many future relationship problems will be prevented if you avoid these people at all costs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:42 AM
1

I suppose it would depend on how he framed it. “Can I get your number?” Sure, maybe. “I want to take you home and fuck you.” No thank you. I don't think that's implied by the description. When people talk about honesty as a virtue, they generally don't mean unlimited license to say and do whatever. I think what OP was getting at was that women supposedly find it attractive when men are direct about their intentions in a socially acceptable manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 11:35 PM
3

walks into debate club "you're all wrong" doesn't elaborate
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:54 AM
1

I’m still not seeing a source, boss
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 11:37 PM
0

I'm not following. The fact that media blames mass shootings (an astronomically rare event btw) on a group as large as single men (about 30% of the US population is single) is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 08:56 PM
5

Straight men have an entitlement problem and a massively overinflated sense of self-worth Nah most men taught they are expendable. What's your evidence that men are over-valued? You just sort of made the claim without any corroborating evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 08:06 PM
1

The only difference is women that don’t want to be used solely for sex are not shooting up barbershops because someone rejected them The problem is that most single (or incel) men don't do this either. Your overall attitude issue is that you allow the actions of a few deranged individuals to generalize to everyone in that group. It's not clear to me how shootings are even relevant to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 08:02 PM
1

Just no touchy without asky I feel like a lot of the women I've spoken with about this don't like asky before touchy. They want men to takey
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter