TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PlutoCharonMelody Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by PlutoCharonMelody on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No your example makes sense. Elderly also have this fear to a greater degree as well. Any group that out-right loses out on force has to contend with that. Although I would not say men and women are rival nations. Certain members of either side definitely treat it as such. Generally in life you want the biggest group of capable entities (entities because non-human animals are also something to consider. Domestication is powerful) being on your side. Bigger groups that work together will always b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 11:59 PM
2

Women deep down know they are physically weaker than men at a base level. To the point where the rule of force is basically unavailable to them at a mass governmental level unless men decide to use their force for them. So when they hate men, they know that the only way to do damage to them is to get the men to turn on each other for self defeating goals. This is just my armchair theory though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 05:30 PM
14

Yeah the article is acting like the corporate world is some holy place that is good to be in instead of it being the fake and cruel reality it actually is. I run a small business and none of what they say applies to my stuff. Only reason people need to get so good at "social/soft skills" in corporate is because of the greedy and maleficent culture the neoliberal economy creates and rewards. A healthy environment is forgiving about social ques, expects you to do your work well and with heart, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 11:48 AM
1

I would not go as far to say that. I know tribes like the Cheyenne were not promiscuous like how you say the Inuits were.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 01:21 PM
11

Conscription would feel so different if the leaders were sacrificing themselves too. But they are always safe and sound and getting richer. If it was like an alien race I read in sci-fi that killed all their leaders if war got declared it would be different. Everyone is sacrificing to do what they plan on doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 01:06 PM
2

If every person thought like this the world would actually be a better place. This is the energy we need to breed in the populace across the world. War has been a stupid money laundering method for wicked elites for too long.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 09:05 PM
2

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 04:29 PM
12

There are articles everywhere stating this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 04:28 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 04:24 PM
12

Honestly feminist thought and politics did break the gender norms version of the social contract. Women were expected to have a home bound role in society for raising children in the past. Men were the ones being the primary breadwinners and the ones expected to do most of the work while women handled homebound things (each time period would have something different being classified as homebound.) Except now many women do not have or want children and also actively discourage other women from ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 03:17 AM
1

Aren't Iranian women doing what all the other women are doing across the world right now and not having any kids? If anything they are being more useless than a man not working as much as he "should" under very patriarchal traditional social roles. This system of intense gender roles only works when technology is not strong and their is very little medicine and medical knowledge to keep people alive. Basically in a system where everyone struggles anyway and another country might go to war with y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 10:27 PM
5

Stop watching blackpill content and go talk with all sorts of people. Blackpill over focuses on the bad side of being human. Yes there are bad people. Yes society can easily setup a raw deal for you if you are not careful. That is no reason to cut yourself off from having relationships of various kinds. Just keep yourself safe as best as you can.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:10 AM
1

Yes? I don't think my claim occurred that rarely in tribes. Maybe I am misremembering anthropology.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:07 PM
1

Still not true. There are tribes in the world who encourage their women to mate with multiple men at once since they think it enhances the child." There are actual instincts that we have but it is very hard to determine what those actually are with how much culture is used to shape them.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:04 PM
1

But you have to approach it that way or you will always lose. Even having that idea will cause you to put on the brakes when advocating for your group. If it is to help out an actual ally to your group then great. The ally will help themselves and your group. But always verify that they are an ally. That is the point. You don't even get to have your way of equality as long as portions of another groups are fighting for supremacy. It is basically the idea of those who love their life lose and tho…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:01 PM
3

Yep any group that tries to advocate for itself by being brow-beaten by other groups to self police are really just falling for the bad faith actors in the out-group. It is just how the universe works. You don't even have to be against women, just only care about men when advocating for men. Men should be helped just for the sake of helping them. Men are awesome.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 07:51 PM
8

Please don't think that this is an evolved trait outright. Men used to have an extremely strong brotherhood and you can tell that when men of antiquity are singing the praises of men in general while considering women as less noble or capable than men. It was not right but it was a thing. Certain feminist groups fought against men ever organizing or having brotherhoods (before we used to have exclusionary men's only groups where country clubs would bar women unless they were just entertainment).
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:02 AM
2

I don't disagree with you. My point is that fighting for the land instead of trying to leave is pointless in Ukraine's circumstance. I would fight for the USA because it at least has a chance at living for the next two hundred years. A lot of the countries that are thinking of conscription are just stupid and letting their people go to almost one birthrate. Your family will not have a country whether it wins or loses in that case. It is already over.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:02 PM
7

We can just start changing society to shame that setup. Humans are not interchangeable and equal which means men have an outsized impact on how society runs. Just start standing up for a society you want to have exist. Our ancestors did. It is horrible for society to let women treat men like expendable options instead of ride or dies.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:18 PM
-3

What does it matter if the country dies. Most of them have such low birthrates that they will just get replaced anyway like Ukraine will.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 12:49 PM
15

Yep people keep sucking up to the powers that be until they just don't anymore. A more effective outsider force takes over because of the incompetence.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 01:31 AM
53

And so the reasonable "radicalization" of boys continue. Eventually they grow into justified men who look back and see how poorly and other they were treated.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:54 AM
5

While that could be true. The AIs would also have to be super advanced to out-compete real people. And if anything, women would be easier to please with them than men are lol. But the dynamics will change drastically for absolutely everything. We could even see a whole-sale adoption of hardcore transhumanism/posthumanism to compete with all the ai.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:06 PM
22

And do they help men out at all?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 09:51 PM
6

You have the correct stance on this subject. While healthcare and for the physical health and life of the mother abortions should be readily available imo overall it should be pro-life rules for everyone. Including expecting the men to contribute to all parts of childcare and finances directly involving the child if the child is actually his. It is telling that so many women replied so aggressively to your post. I hope your bf is really good to you.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:44 PM
1

White people try not to demean the opposite sex challenge: Impossible. I have met men from latam, they are not macho men to Western values at all lol.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 06:40 PM
1

Was this mandated by law or something?
/r/MensRights13/12/25 03:17 AM
4

I imagine in the USA we would just start fragging our own these days. Armies would not conscript men if it was a guarantee death sentence to the army's efforts. Right now the USA is quite well off military wise. Conscription would make it worse.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 12:12 AM
9

Unironically we are going through an evolutionary filter on women the likes we have never seen before. Mostly only the women that have the mentality you mentioned are going to be the ones that show up in future ancestry tests. Future women will basically be immune to the current zeitgeist's worldview imo.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 11:58 PM
7

Well that woman is domestic evil incarnate. Better watch her political career.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 12:26 AM
4

Most women I know are fine with paternity tests. They might object to government initiatives on forcing everyone to take them for various reasons. Although the most vocal women tend to be the ones who want to have the power to abuse fraud if they want. These are a minority of women in most cultures as far as I am aware. Most of the data involves the paternity testing labs and the number of people using them which is inherently skewed.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:14 PM
14

Yeah I don't like Mamdami. Politicians are just now realizing they have to pay lip service for men but they don't want to lose women's support since that group is more mobilized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 12:33 PM
16

My main gripe is that women are not assigned any duties by society. Societies before would force them into having children and stripping away rights like they did everyone else. It was brutal to everyone. Now women can freely leave countries to never return like in Ukraine while the men die. I really think it is just because of elites wanting to off the population and since women are already abstaining from having kids there is no reason to get rid of them.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:27 PM
1

He can as he is the decision maker. It just would not work out that well in the dynamic without a decent reason. Although since he is in charge overall he will be more likely to need to provide financing while assigning necessary work around the house.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 05:42 PM
-4

Depends. I am patriarchal traditional gender roles. Men have the final say in the relationship and household decisions. The woman informs the man then he makes the choice on his own. It is not useful for all relationships sure, but certain relationship structures support that outlook. Basically Patriarchal Christian and Muslim norms through history before liberalism and certain kink community relationship norms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 05:06 PM
9

How is initiation not an important part of being 50/50? It is an aspect of the relationship. People have to initiate contact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 02:06 PM
1

Countries rules about conscription make no sense if that is the case. I think it really is them just trying to treat their citizens like slaves.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:35 PM
10

Nah it is in conflict. 50/50 usually refers to an egalitarian relationship with little use of gender roles. One side being the initiator is a gender role perspective. Many people love the gender roles for men but loath the roles that place work on women. It is toxic tbh. I personally am pro gender roles but I expect both sides to be evaluated on the level of work they put in to adhere and enjoy them. Emphasis on work for both sides because very traditional roles had men as the initiator and deci…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 12:33 PM
5

By the wording I assumed he meant a foreigner who became a German citizen would be exempt. Perhaps I misunderstood.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:43 AM
21

Woah they really are making native German men second class citizens.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:24 AM
5

I think it just has to do with the fact that men worship women too much. Like irl I see a lot of men brag about how great they think women are. It is weird stop it. Bring some of that Greek wisdom about women back 😭 For Reddit: The last section not counting this one is a joke.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 06:39 PM
1

Again that makes sense and I agree they have that motive. But they have completely lost their other motive about how to train women into their ideals. They are not even abiding by them at all.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:56 AM
3

Well that is horrifying.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:17 PM
2

I know that. But the "traditional" types nowadays have women being pastors and leaders in their churches/communities when a lot of the religions have verses forbidding that. I am saying it is just the churches' misandry causing this and not anything else. Besides maybe foolishly thinking they can generate more children this way.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:14 PM
8

If that was the case, shouldn't they be hardcore pushing the women into having children? They rarely mention women's responsibility in having children.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 05:10 PM
8

Yeah countries don't realize that an easy fix to the birthrate issue is making women think pregnancy is the most self serving option lol.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 12:44 PM
1

This is months later. I hope you are finding joy in your life now. Everything you have gone through recently is pretty rough. It is nice to hear that you love your ex-husband.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 03:27 AM
2

It is true to a degree. Women tend to mate with men in higher positions outside of arranged marriages in certain modern scenarios. Honestly hypergamy is much less interesting as a psychological trait than a lot of others and sucks the oxygen out of the room for other important psychological traits to understand.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 03:02 AM
18

Most of us here don't hate women. We may be tired of the societal bs but we don't hate. Keyword most though.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 02:51 AM
1

Yeah nearly every law is written with the assumption of past women who would be at home taking care of children and having more than three. Nowadays women are basically just weaker variants of men in society that we prop up for no reason.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 11:45 AM
23

Nah sports is a great example. A lot of women hate admitting that men are actually better at them then women. Differences is not the correct term when in an open competition one side will outright dominate. Psychological aspects are prominent too but you should bring up natural teamwork inclinations and other aspects that men are better at. I actually don't know if men are better than women at math itself.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:14 AM
65

I don't know if math is the best example. Although I do agree that society coddles girls in the worst way by telling them they are only better than boys. It is how girls will end up thinking that they will always be able to beat the boys in sports and other fields. They also never allow the boys to have their own groups specific for them.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:58 AM
6

Good luck with your efforts!
/r/MensRights17/10/25 12:25 AM
30

The male space has to be comfortable being considered misogynistic by society as a whole if it wants to stay as a male only support place. I would be fine running that as I have set up support and venting places online before but it takes too much of my time.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:12 PM
4

Virtues and principles are only good insofar as both sides abide by it so that any conflict is much less harsh. Once one side breaks the rules, then all sides must break the rules to compete. It applies to war as much as regular society. We men should really start being more thorough in our support of one another.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 05:43 PM
1

Okay so you have a massive advantage dating women when you are 6 ft+. Every man who is aware knows this is how it is now. Women no longer have any traditional courtship dynamics so they basically only go for what other women will find attractive and that is universally 6 ft+ and fit since wealth is not that important now. If you show any interest in a woman she will be much more warm and receptive than if you are 5 ft 6 for example. When you are interacting with people, they will give you defere…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 05:32 PM
1

I am curious. Is it simply because now you don't have to deal with men hitting on you that you think life is better? Maybe from the cismen's perspective they want women so badly that they try to make things happen and get depressed more often since women hate that men want them that much lol. Are you dating women or men now? Also how tall are you? The only thing you specifically mentioned was in regards to relationships so that is the only thing I went off of.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:41 PM
2

Nah a lot of Ukrainian women have left Ukraine and probably won't be coming back ever since they are starting families and lives elsewhere. The men are dying for nothing as the country will die in a decade or two from lack of births.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:05 AM
12

I can handwave issues when the other side handwaves mine lol. It might not be the best thing to do but most women, especially the young ones, would never go to bat for me outside of what I bring them and maybe if even that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:01 AM
2

You act like women are not just as bad and dirty. Yall are just as bad as men when it comes to hygiene.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 11:58 PM
3

I mean if men disregard their safety and wellbeing they die and don't pass on genes either. They have to work together to accomplish their goals and feed their family. Also we don't really know what our ancestors lives were like tbh.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 07:14 PM
2

Good post. Do you think a patriarchal oriented society succeeded because the agrarian revolution happened or did the agrarian revolution happen because men started gaining more power in their tribes and out-competed the other tribes because of it?
/r/MensRights10/10/25 11:33 AM
1

Is this why Edwin's Sex and Culture research showed what it did? Does our species have a weird cycle of boom and bust for mens/women's privileges?
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:29 PM
1

Men still are needed. We handle the majority of all political force and protection. Women literally can never do that. And if automation ever takes over, it will be ai running it not humans even though we will have the illusion of control. These ideas just push a misandrist perspective about how men are less valuable than women. Often women want this to be true and men accept it on the base of their territorial and protection instincts (women are a part of their territory imo).
/r/MensRights08/10/25 03:02 PM
1

I like masculinity though. I just don't want anyone taking advantage of my natural tendencies for their own selfish gains which is happening en mass. Basically women are never allowed to instruct us on masculinity. It is a concept only useful amongst men.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 01:25 AM
4

What rookie mistakes are there to make? You have to form a ton of long lasting relationships throughout life. They are not that different between what types of relationships there are outside of financial only ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:03 AM
2

It might be needed again in the future. Civilizations never stay the same over long periods of time. And the world looks like it will be heading for a harder time with the environment and politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:53 AM
3

Ye lol. He is a tradcon but I don't know if I would call him a simp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 12:04 AM
3

What would be your opinion on figures like Andrew Wilson? He is tradcon kinda but is very much so against feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/25 08:34 PM
0

That is nowhere near the truth. He has an army of bodyguards at his disposal to stop such a thing. Plus the best lawyers in the world that he could hire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/25 08:33 PM
5

You don't need a majority, just around half. I think that is doable if we frame it as men being benefited so they can lead society/have families/improve social standing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:32 AM
50

While I kind of agree in the sense that men should unite together for their own benefit (even at the exclusion of other's real or perceived benefits) I don't agree in the sense that women are always united. The existence of pro choice vs pro life women kind of proves the point. Also plenty of women are quite happy to have areas bombed regardless of if it harms other women or not lol. The real issue is that men don't have a group of ourselves (excluding others aside from ancillary allies) that on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 12:28 AM
5

We need to dismantle feminism and all of its' support structures. Plus we need massive shaming for any hallmarks of feminist inspired thought. They hate men and only want to dismantle anything men do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 11:01 PM
1

Every woman says this lol. Hopefully it is true for you as it would get you out of the self inflicted conflict with other women.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 04:49 PM
1

There are a few tradcons (basically tradcons that would be disliked by most tradcons these days lol) who would have solidarity with men legitimately. It would just be in a way that is not egalitarian. I say this as it is important to note as those types will fight for men even if they disagree on some fundamental issues. Left wing MRAs can work with them when handling societal issues even if there are other major disagreements.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 07:35 PM
3

You are an enemy to men working together. To care about women more than men is stupid and wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 08:54 PM
3

This is the real issue. Men have to fight for only their own benefit against this. That means actually working together as brothers and demand/force the society they are in to actually reward them for their contribitions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 08:52 PM
2

Someone's pissy. Women not wanting kids is fine and no one should force women into having kids. Hating children though is awful and should be shamed. You seem like the latter who hates kids and I hope that you learn why that is such a horrific perspective to have.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 01:56 PM
2

I wish more women thought like you. Most of the women I meet irl hate the idea of having children themselves somehow.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:42 PM
1

Honestly sounds like he should not have married. At first glance it seems as though she would not actually be interested in him.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:05 AM
8

Yeah there is literally no reason for men to support modern societies as they are lol. We really ought to get together and make them start benefiting us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/25 12:17 PM
1

While society only values you if others value you (because multiple people are what makes up societies opinions), you have to think that you alone should have benefits. Everyone can always improve themselves in some way to achieve some goal. That does not mean that the person is less worthy of consideration before they make improvements. You are deserving of society trying to help you and it is society's fault for failing to do so. You also should always be trying to improve yourself too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 09:47 PM
5

Tbf if countries are going to make a certain sex have obligations, then they also must be given special privileges coinciding with that. Right now men just get told to work and die for a society that treats women as superior to them. At least in certain older societies with oppression, they often had some areas where they would give the men certain privileges never granted to women when certain demands were put on the men. Not all though of course as history is rife with suck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter