TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pm_me_ur_pet_pics- Archive

View 2 posts and 35 comments by Pm_me_ur_pet_pics- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I still care whether or not he’s productive If he’s wealthy and has the ability to take care of himself and more for the rest of his life, that’s great. But I still want him to be doing somethinggg Either volunteer regularly, have activities (surfing and climbs mountains) and create some sort of big goals. Also I want children so him being home a lot can be helpful if he’s a present father. But yeah I want him to make use of his free time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:47 AM
1

For the last bullet point, I agree. My circle of female friends are upper middle class, while my circle of male friends are more versatile. So I don’t have much input of how women in lower middle class date. I do have two friends who are women, middle class, working modest jobs. Their partners are pretty equivalent in status as well, one is a server the other one was in blue collar. Maybe I need to women in different statuses first, but im not seeing women really end up in relationships with men…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:57 PM
1

Two things: 1. A lot of tinder matches occur because to men it’s a number game, so they swipe with no intention of pursing every women Just because a unattractive woman get matches from men, doesn’t mean it’s of value. Often I see these women being used only for sexual relief rather true genuine connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 04:56 AM
1

I think my friend should leave him too. It’s hard when you have invested so much time, and harder if you get married and have kids. In my friends case, yes she should bite the bullet and leave. But lots of women don’t or can’t because marriage, kids, financial dependencey Regardless I’m not sure if we will agree on a common ground for who has it harder, but I will say I don’t disagree dating is hard for men and I truly hope you do find someone that is good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:30 AM
1

My friend is not LGBT, she’s a pretty girl. Just dominant career wise and assertive. Her boyfriend is quiet but not anti-social or weird. I’m not sure why it’s hard for you to believe women can have their own preferences too. I would never want to date someone cocky because internally I feel they’re insecure people who need constant validation. I think it’s more productive to encourage men to socialize, build up their self esteem and confidence than to be cocky or in a dark triad. Be confident a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:47 PM
-1

Yes on dating apps, we judge based on more superficial attributes. I know some average looking guys who don’t know how to take pictures at ALL, but they have charm and friendliness that can’t be conveyed online, so they have better luck dating in person. I also think women in my age range (mid 20s) and older, care less about appearance and more about the whole package. IMO most of my female friends partners are not as attractive as my female friends.. they’re all either balding, slightly overwei…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:24 PM
0

I can only say based on my experience. I like guys who’re confident but not cocky. My friend likes shyer guys because she has a dominant personality so prefers someone she doesn’t butt heads with. There’s other nerdy girls I know who have a fear or annoyance with overtly cocky guys. I also think you’re comparing college experiences with women of all ages. When I was in university I liked confidence a lot more and social magnetism was important to me. Now I’m in my mid 20s, it’s not a trait that’…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:54 PM
-2

What I’m arguing isn’t that dating is hard for men. I know it is. Even if you get matches, trying to court a relationship is hard. And I know women can be dry and unfriendly on apps at times. I’m arguing that women don’t have ridiculous standards as one claim. If you’re an average looking man, with hobbies, friends and some goals - you will find a relationship, even if you have to be the one doing all the initiation. Plus I feel you see the “relationship” part as easy. I don’t think it is, datin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:49 PM
0

Ok sure, confidence is attractive and confident men will have better success with women than non-confident men. I know a lot of normie men, who have no issues finding a girlfriend. If their goal was to have sex and only sex with extremely beautiful women - yes they might struggle. But they’re nerdy, and they’re dating cute nerdy girls. I highly doubt their gfs would want to date a cocky alpha male or may feel unsafe with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:40 PM
-1

To your last point - Men have it harder in the beginning of relationships, women have complained about weaponized incompetence during a relationship. I.e women take care of majority of the household chores & childcare, including emotional labour
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:33 PM
1

I’ll agree with you on one point, I think women are too critical of men in the west, for how they socialize. I can understand why some men might fear trying to date at all. Even though I think most of these women are localized online, it’s not great to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:30 PM
1

For me, I’m selective because I won’t give every guy that’s attractive a chance. I want us to have compatibility so we match long term. If a man checks off 70% of my boxes, then I can let go of the remaining 30%. Provided I align with him on my non-negotiables, such as finances, kids, religion. I don’t think those standards are high, I’ve dated one guy when I was 19 because we got along and he was cute, but we had no similar goals or interests. It resulted in lots of arguments and dis alignment …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:27 PM
-3

Yes the beginning stages of relationship is important but its also work to maintain a relationship. I hear a lot of women complain about “during” relationship, where they commit more household and emotional labour than their partner. I won’t deny being an unattractive man is difficult. I know a man who has a facial disfigurement and is 5’4, and he’s been in 3 long term relationships before, but he really had to work to build himself up outside his appearance. And dating is harder for him than hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:17 PM
3

Yeah I guess I haven’t thought of the options the average women have. Compared to the past, women are more selective. But I don’t necessarily think their standards are too high. And also a lot of the men end up not being interested in long term if those men have options too. As an example, two of my female friends who work modest jobs and live homebody lifestyles, have lots of men interested in them. But they end up dating men who are also similar to them - e.g they’re also homebodies, with mini…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:41 PM
2

I can’t argue with the last sentence. Women do have more choice but at the end of the day, I don’t think any women I know are dating men that are out of their league.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:27 PM
4

Gaming is fine. I game too. It just doesn’t occupy most of free time. I also work out, read, paint, or look ways to improve myself for areas I don’t like.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:26 PM
-1

Men are and can be equally, or more ambitious than women. That can work out, have hobbies, goals etc. My experience is anecdotal but the men I know who are single, struggle in finding love, don’t put effort for themselves. I know many, average men in happy relationships. The difference is they have goals/hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:25 PM
3

I think this is slightly true. Women in the past were less selective because they had less choice. But I also believe men in the past had greater rates of employment, socialization and effort
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:22 PM
2

okay then yes, I agree - beginning stages of a relationship is harder for men BUT for women interested in dating, I don’t think they have high standards. They’re just selective
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:20 PM
2

That’s great you want to live that lifestyle, but unfortunately a lot of women still want children and a house, and that is why they prefer men with some sort of goal or life they can build togetber
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:19 PM

Life is expensive, I want to have kids so yes I do need a man with a financially stable job
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:06 PM
2

Girl wot? You’re literally putting words in my mouth without critically thinking… Women who experience violence from men where they distrust & hate men, should definitely receive therapy and not pursue relationships until they can be secure enough to communicate and be a good partner. Men shouldn’t be in relationships if they hate women due to their own negative experiences. How is that alienating? How old are you? You seem very young, and lack the understanding and complexity that comes in rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:50 PM
3

You can acknowledge inequality without dehumanization. There’s men of color, men in the LGBT community, men that are lower class (etc) that are impacted by men’s issues (mental health, loneliness, education is not set up for them) AND other contributed by their race/gender/sexuality. Why alienate men? Do we not want a cohesive society? Nobody is saying women are not prone to violence or lack power, those problems still exist. I’m not sure if you’re straight and are in relationships but you’ll st…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:44 PM
5

It does not matter if it’s a hyperbole, nobody from any group would like to hear that, and it shows a slight hatred for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:32 PM
4

I said women who make statements like below are likely to be emotionally abusive or emotionally invalidating in relationships with men • ⁠men serve no serve purpose • ⁠literally every time a man is near me, I get annoyed • ⁠men are pathetic and easy Explain to me why that’s not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:56 PM
3

What part of statement is then victim blaming
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:13 PM
2

How does stating that “men serve no purpose” is a harmful statement, victim blaming women?? Are you in the western world?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:47 AM
2

Ok one example - our access to information, people’s opinions, the news. Never have we in history been so connected before. And it’s a fact that social media has impacted our emotional health, increased anxiety & depression. We also overindulge in processed food, we’re more sedentary than before etc, etc. When we live a better life than loyalty did hundreds of years ago, but our ability to motivate and create goals for ourselves is impacted. And yet at the same time, we see on social media that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:43 AM
3

Where did I make that statement? The way OP wrote his description seems like he did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:02 PM
17

It helps if you don’t objectify them and see them as people. And also build up your charisma. I don’t think most women are swayed purely by looks - although it’s an advantage. They’re swayed by looks + charisma. Plus why would women risk sleeping with just anyone? Even if they get horny. They’re picky because they are shamed for their body counts, and risk being in unsafe situations
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:13 PM
5

I sometimes see this due to men feeling entitled to a woman, due to their perceived status or believe that specific woman should have an inferiority complex (maybe the woman isn’t super attractive). And get offended those woman still have standards or isn’t swayed by every mediocre man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:52 PM
8

I completely agree! But I find that most people (online and in circles I’ve been in) agree that Red Pill is toxic, Andrew Tate is toxic. I find a lot of people believe the hatred of men is justified because of so-so reason
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:45 PM
5

I think this is different debate altogether. I also don’t think more rights make us less happy. The only thing I’ll mention in regards to “the happiness paradox” is that women will almost always pick the freedom to have a career, be educated, own a bank account, etc, vs how they were treated in the 50s. It’s overindulgence in society thats keeping us unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:37 PM
38

Maybe it’s not experienced by you, but I have heard from women who “don’t like men” yet still want relationships with them, do not see anything wrong in their statement. To amend their behaviour they’ll say things like “I hate every man besides my boyfriend” and none of their friends or people in their circle sees anything wrong with that. Because it’s expected to hate men, and men to be ok with that’s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:29 PM
10

https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/childbearing-age#benefits-andrisks If men wanted healthy children and is looking for younger women, I do not understand why they don’t go for mid 20s and up. Going for 19 year olds is weird. And keep in mind, historically women have given birth all the way till their late 30s. Because they had many kids as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 07:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter