TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Politithrowawayacc Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by Politithrowawayacc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

They won't ever agree with that because deep down what they want is to manipulate and gaslight their partner into complete, mindless, doubtless trust. A DNA test is a straight up threat to them because they know, damn well, that it's sole purpose is to completely nullify that kind of gaslighting and reveal their secrets. Don't ever forget fellas, that secrets are the same as explosive ammunition to women. They do everything they can to stockpile that ammo, so they can detonate it in your face wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 08:55 AM
2

Gosh darn it, I'm SOOO BEYOND sick and tired of the "men can pick and choose any partner" rhetoric, I swear this one little myth pervades at the base of all misandry and is what makes it so toxic against men. Zero critical thinking on their end, just full on assumption that they know everything going on in men's heads and what they deal with in their love lives. Good ass find. Sometimes I need this kind of hard proof to show that feminism has wrongfully instilled into the masses that men are all…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 07:40 PM
12

The harsh truth is pretty simple; male sexuality/promiscuity itself has been demonized to the point where people actively reject him as either homosexual or straight up a grapist whenever a man has a high libido and seeks sexual satisfaction. My issue has to do with the fact that women purposely withhold sex as a form of relationship manipulation to get him to spend more money or do more favors for her, but simultaneously argue that decriminalized sex work is oppressive to women. Transactional, …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 04:32 PM
1

This, this right here. They're totally blind to the implications of their own words and beliefs lmfao. Men commit when they're lonely and have no one close to them left (THEIR OWN WORDS), women DON'T commit BECAUSE they "worry about the people closest to them". What an irony that is. They acknowledge someone would care enough to be devastated, and clean up after them, and use that as the reason to keep going as if everyone has that. Literally born with pre-programmed privilege of knowing you wil…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/26 03:27 PM
2

Search query result: "If you're a male who is lonely, it's actually quite oppressive to own a cat. Owning a cat is adjacent to patriarchal values, as men used to 'own' their wives"
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 05:26 PM
1

Good catch. That's EXACTLY what it means lmfao. The commonality of the "dehumanizing" theme is quite alarming too, I gets the feels that it's their subconscious directly projecting their dehumanizing thought patterns onto the men they judge.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 03:58 PM
22

It's always so ironic how they constantly pick on young males for entertaining themselves... they never once think that maybe, just maybe, men turn to those hobbies for entertainment BECAUSE nobody/nothing else accepts them as they are. Is it really surprising to these people that requiring someone to perfectly check off a laundry list of stipulations and precursors to be eligible for basic social respect means that they just don't care to be entertained by socializing? They go where they are bo…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 01:17 PM
4

I got a week long ban under that same reasoning. For something like "Men complete suicide more often because there's less hope and faith for them, and, objectively, their lives aren't as worth living compared to a woman's". I guess maybe it was that last part, it totally goes against the reddit narrative that men's lives are easier due to male "privilege"
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 04:29 PM
2

Well, how else will those women defer their personal accountability if they regret their decision afterward? That's what it all boils down to; women wanting a way to make adult decisions, but held to the level of responsibility of a child. A yes in the past cannot be changed to a no in the present. Girls need to be taught in health class that REGRET IS NOT RAPE.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 12:04 PM
13

It's more simple than that. Those types of women just loathe anything that makes men happy and content.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 09:39 AM
24

They don't want boys because they're afraid of their "eventual indoctrination" "against them" I don't want a boy because I couldn't live with myself forcing any boy to struggle through today's disgusting anti male society and education system I wonder who the empathetic gender really is...
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 08:44 AM
2

The most ironic part is that she just recounted with direct quotational details a man opening up to her about how he feels; the exact thing feminists say men don't do enough lmfao. I wonder who the emotionally stunted gender really is?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 06:10 PM
15

It's ironic how they feel genuinely entitled to their anxiety even when the situation turns out ok every time. "Yeah my instincts were wrong for the 9999th time, but it's men's fault for making me feel like something bad will happen every time!"
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:37 PM
3

This is the best way I've ever seen this idea written out, thank you genuinely! Male sexuality itself is/has been totally demonized. It's insane how overtly the push for guilt is for highly sexual men, ESPECIALLY bi men; to not seek out casual sexual relationships, to stop porn, stop masturbating, etc. Like, why should they feel guilty partaking in life's greatest natural pleasure, ever?
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 03:07 PM
4

Yup, should be that way, but it's the hashtag Me2 girls that genuinely think a man that gets hard and doesn't beat her up must be consenting.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 11:55 AM
24

Omfg, the comment about "We put women and children first because when disaster struck, it was fathers ditching them"... pretending like the "disaster" in question wasn't WAR, that they were DRAFTED to serve and die in TO PROTECT THEM. Just when I think man hating can't possibly get more tone deaf and deranged.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 04:38 PM
1

Because men in general mostly focus on the immediate aspects of the relationship rather than the small and subtle ones when weighing risks of commitment. Disagreements on opinionated matters are weighted far less for women in society in general; people are socially conditioned to go along with females even if they disagree with them deep down. And, like others said, men don't typically see issue with that sort of major difference between them and their partner until it creates a direct conflict.…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/26 01:45 AM
33

Woman becomes widow - husband didn't take care of himself enough
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/26 01:23 AM
1

I totally think they should. Here's a cool recent story to tell regarding him: He went all crybaby and told the mods on me to delete my comments in his post on that sub for, exact verbatim, "manipulated information", when I didn't even cite one single source in our little argument. The biggest irony was that the mods then messaged me and basically told me the supposedly manipulated source of information I was sharing was a threat of spreading false narratives, and told me "clearly you didn't eve…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 11:49 PM
7

They apparently want love, support, and peace, but truly believe they should never be the ones to show it first. They always need "proof" that someone "deserves" it, and default to apathy otherwise. Don't they know how simple the concept is; that giving love gets you love, and giving hatred spreads more hatred?
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 09:58 AM
1

Absolutely. Male sexuality in general is so demonized. Things considered pleasurable to men is automatically perceived as "pornographic" which has its own connotations of grossness/disgust... for some reason society still thinks the action of pleasing men strictly means you're in a position that's weak and subservient to him. I wont ever stop saying, decriminalizing prostitution really seems like the most logical step towards solving male's sexual repression without sacrificing women's freedoms
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/25 02:45 PM
7

Basically, but it can be a little more broad. The trope in question you're referring to is the "taming the wild beast" trope (some just straight up call it the Beauty and the Beast trope, but it's been around far longer than that). The "he's broken and has a terrible past, but I can still love him, and that will fix him!" trope. However, I think the trope usually tackles this by having the "beast" in question treat the woman differently than he treats others, she opens up to him, and he betters …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 01:17 PM
1

It's insane to me that a man's sexual satisfaction is the sworn enemy, the vile creature, the one thing women shall always avoid at all costs. To the point where you can literally ANNOUNCE your INTENTION to USE men for their money, and it's celebrated, all the way until they find out he got to have sex. Then it's suddenly oppressive? This is why we need sex work fully decriminalized. Want equal rights? Let's start with equal access to sex.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 08:06 PM
3

And they will froth at the mouth with rage if you then remind them that males with sexual trauma also are more likely to be hypersexual, AND homosexual... even if you're like me and think it's perfectly ok to be either of those things, they NEED to attack you for speaking out of their line
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/25 05:56 PM
1

Theory? I feel like the literal only time in history that male disposability would be merely a theory, would be in modern times. The only reason male births were ever desirable in history is exactly as you said, men were the protectors, so having one meant more muscle in the family/tribe even if he doesn't get the chance to reproduce. Even back then, they acknowledged males were disposable, but the kicker is that there used to be honor and glory in your disposability, now there is no honor or gl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 12:39 PM
1

It's funny because the picture they're painting is detailed and clear as day; they believe men only deserve a the life he wants if he's "earned" it, while women are fully entitled to their ideal best life at any expense, usually men's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 11:53 AM
3

The most terrifying realization being, this is exactly what would happen. They would say "it's because our men have become lazy and weak, they don't know how to be a man anymore", and I know that because that exact rhetoric is already spread around... they call it "the male loser epidemic" lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 11:36 AM
1

I think both of you have valid points. I don't think the issue should be handwaved (even though I totally agree that men are ALWAYS handwaved at, regarding social struggles) but I certainly believe a thin dating pool for women is MUUUCH less distressing to a society than a thin pool for men. Women will almost always have some sort of choice or say in partnership and motherhood or not, whether there's only 10 men or 10 million. I do feel bad, definitely more women in that place will end up unpart…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 11:08 AM
2

It's because they are now SO socially conditioned to cannibalize any women who dissent from the extremist feminist movement. It's fucking brilliant, because women are the masters of manipulating people socially through vindication, exclusion, and shame. No wonder so many fall down that pipeline, it feels good to them to put others down, and all they have to do in return is allow the extremist behavior and rhetoric continue unburdened.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 10:05 AM
4

I've always wondered, what DOES copium X max, ultra denial formula taste like? Must be good to think interpretive dance theory is a valid field to devote a life of study to
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 09:16 AM
2

Absolutely. This has been the problem with progressive ideologies in general; they only feel the need to fight so damn much because they see the world so black and white, and unfortunately they can only see themselves as victims fighting on the good side. Misogynists, and feminists. Racism, and social justice. Oppressive, and incompetent. Enemies, and heroes. Predators, and prey.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 07:59 PM
4

Nah nah mate, this is good and entirely accurate. More accurate to life than the male version, that's for flipping sure.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 05:36 PM
5

Nice nitpick, maybe it’s not literally always, but the answer is still commonly yes, undeniably. Either you live under a rock, or you’ve heard of the “666” trend on women’s dating profiles. Just to be clear, 6 figure income is top 2% of all people. Even a 9/10 man expecting a top 10% woman is seen as stratosphere level standards, but for women it’s “the bare minimum” as they put it. Love when people compare women’s and men’s standards because the numbers speak entirely for themselves on it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter