TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Popeychops Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by Popeychops on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Shouldn't they REWARD universities that have fewer or no rapes? No, absolutely not, that would encourage universities to race to the bottom while sweeping real victims under the carpet. Universities shouldn't be rewarded for attempting to adjudicate criminal matters at all.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 11:27 PM
1

Perhaps JB's servers can't stand the ol' reddit hug of death?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:21 AM
2

You can pick your own charity instead. I send my humbles to the British Red Cross.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:37 AM
2

I don't understand what would offend a person by being expected to split a bill on a first date. It's implicitly stating that you are entering into the relationship on an equal footing. It also means that neither is plying the other party with some kind of token offering, the date is just a means to spending time with a person, not the end itself. I have never been on a date where we haven't split the bill (except the times when I self-indulgently drag my girlfriend to sporting events).
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:36 AM
5

Even if this image is not true, some of the comments in this thread are pretty embarrassing. Yes, it's terrible that universal male suffrage is linked to the draft, and only came about in the UK after the horrific loss of life during the First World War, but if women did have to fight and die for the right to vote, that would also be an injustice. We should be pleased that both men and women living in liberal democracies today can vote.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:03 PM
3

Maybe you should just not hit people at all?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 10:47 PM
2

You can always ask the author for their data and attempt to reproduce their results yourself. If you get a negative response, then that's very telling.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 07:19 AM
3

I can only speak for natural sciences, but your suggestion that ideas are accepted based on something other than experiment is just wrong. If you don't have sufficient data to make a convincing argument for your theory, your papers will struggle to make it through peer review.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:58 PM
6

I can only speak for natural sciences, but your suggestion that ideas are accepted based on something other than experiment is just wrong. If you don't have sufficient data to make a convincing argument for your theory, your papers will struggle to make it through peer review.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:58 PM
28

I can never understand why Universities see fit to be the arbiter of criminal charges. If somebody is accused of a crime, they should be tried by a jury of their peers, not sent before a tribunal of untrained bureaucrats.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:54 PM
3

Perhaps they are unaware that the Oscar-winning film about his life is based on his former wife's book. It manages to depict her leaving him for another man without portraying her as a villain (which is fair).
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:07 AM
1

Nice to meet another soviet on this sub, I'm used to blocking out the libertarianism that normally gets banded about!
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:43 AM
4

I usually vote with a pencil in my right hand.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 03:54 PM
0

I'd call the assumption of innocence for the accused "due process"
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:29 AM
2

I'm not a big fan of the methods of the suffragettes in my country (more of a suffragist, personally), but I definitely support equal rights under law.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:20 PM
0

I'm happy to make the effort to convince any third-parties reading this that you're in the wrong, even if you won't admit that your own words prove it. Edit: Oh no, my precious internet points!
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:54 PM
1

You said: Most teachers are female. If both sexes favor their own to the same degree, it is the boys who end up being screwed simply because for every man favoring the boys there are three women favoring the girls. But some girls are being screwed too. Why not speak up for the principles of fairness and equality by calling out both sets of biases, instead of just protecting our own. You said nothing about it being "generally" the boys who were screwed. You used the fact that there are more femal…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:40 PM
1

Why does the fact that fewer girls are screwed than boys make the screwing of said girls irrelevant? Why trivialise their problem by saying only the boys suffer? That point of view can't be justified. It's immoral.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:09 PM
-1

It really isn't. You said: it is the boys who end up being screwed Which just is not true. A majority of the students screwed are boys. But some girls are just as screwed. Whitewashing them out of the picture is as bad as the fallacy I referred to. Edit: for Christ's sake, shutting me up by downvoting me and ignoring what I've said won't change the fact that this rhetoric is used by SJWs to trivialise the suffering of groups they don't like.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:39 PM
6

That doesn't make prejudice ethically justifiable. That's the same logic which leads to the fallacy of suggesting that "privileged classes cannot be discriminated against".
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:04 AM

Male students tend to bet less when assessed by a female teacher than by an external examiner or by a male teacher. This is consistent with female teachers' grading practices; female teachers give lower grades to male students. Female students bet more when assessed by a male teacher than when assessed by an external examiner or a female teacher. Female students' behavior is not consistent with male teachers' grading practices, since male teachers tend to reward male students more than female st…
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:30 PM
3

What kind of precious flower gets upset over a statistics textbook example? Are they getting offended over the Poisson distribution for red cars that don't have disabled badges? Because that's how ridiculous that is.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:36 AM
3

You should hold your head high. You did the right thing by not staying in a place where you would be subject to violence. She clearly needs help with her anger. Are you going to press charges?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:47 PM
12

Shitlady.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:21 PM
1

I don't disagree.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:58 PM
8

So is an employer for their employees, but you don't see any company trying to replace the police force.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:06 PM
1

Even if your jurisdiction doesn't recognise female-on-female rape, they probably will recognise the use of drugs as an assault. You should report this to the police, and also to your attacker's parents.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:26 PM
9

It could be a help, rather than a hindrance. OP could legitimately claim to have been a victim of a violent crime and justify his perspective.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:19 PM
1

How? Chances are there was already a statement to the press about this.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:18 PM
1

Actually, if that were making headline news with an MRA instead of a feminist, you'd probably see plenty of posts here denouncing the vile acts.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:05 PM
10

It can already be spun that way. Pressing the charges won't change a thing.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:43 PM
2

What an idiotic idea. The gender of firefighters isn't important: what matters is whether or not they're capable of doing an incredibly dangerous and physically demanding job. This is childish and will endanger the lives of firefighters and the public.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:29 PM
1

Lets not mention that the Copernican model was dismissed for good reasons in favour of the Brahean model by the catholic church (failure to explain the retrograde motion of planets). It wasn't until Kepler that we got a satisfactory astrophysical model that resembles modern knowledge.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:36 AM
10

It's almost a shame that the case was dismissed, as he could afford to wreck her in legal fees if he were the one filing the frivolous court cases.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:22 AM
2

Why aren't you looking for another job?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:15 PM
3

This is not a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:23 AM
3

How did you grow up thinking that this sort of behaviour is acceptable? How can you, heat of the moment or not, possibly have thought this was the right way to treat someone you love? This little tale is such a mess: "my boyfriend has depression and didn't want to spend the night with me, so when he wouldn't apologise in the morning I went apeshit, smashed his things and beat him up. But I'm sorry!". No, remorse isn't good enough. This just shouldn't happen. You describe what occurred as "resort…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 09:34 AM
1

Definitely the guy who finds rape victims hilarious.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:22 AM
0

The United Kingdom is one of those places. It tends to be countries with a strong feminist tradition, where changing the law from its archaic form was seen as unnecessary after Women's liberation.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:21 AM
2

I don't disagree with any of the issues you describe, but the sensationalised title is not an accurate portrayal of the article linked to. You'll notice I've been careful not to pretend that his divorces didn't contribute to his mental health. I'm sure they proved very detrimental and caused him a great deal of hardship. But they weren't the only cause, depression is not simple, and it has no quick fixes. And neither does the state of divorce law in English in speaking countries. The answers are…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:00 PM
5

I don't mean to come off as callous or uncaring, but he also had a house which he valued at $10m+ which he wasn't finding a buyer for. I appreciate that the man's divorces caused him to lose a great deal of money, but compared to an average person he was still wealthy. Pinning the blame on one thing just doesn't work. He suffered a lot. It's disrespectful to capitalise on that to push your agenda, regardless of what merit that agenda has.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:20 PM
3

My recent posting history is all either in /r/FEMRAdebates or /r/LiverpoolFC. That doesn't exactly support the assertion that I'm an SRS shill. Frankly, it's shit like this which is the reason why I post on this sub about once a month now, a year ago I was quite active (it was even my highest karma breakdown sub) yet the quality of the responses I get seems to have declined. I certainly was not linked from the outside: I've probably been subbed longer than you. Just sort the top-level comments b…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:15 PM
2

If anyone who doesn't agree with you is automatically "brigading", you're going to have a very hard time convincing anyone to agree with you.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:41 AM

You are just downvoting anyone who doesn't agree with you, aren't you? There are plenty of constructive points in my comment. I suggest you consider them instead of making witty retorts.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:30 AM

I don't think this is an honest interpretation of the article. While you might say that divorce contributed to his depression, you might also say that the downward turn of his career contributed too, along with his failure to turn assets into cash. I feel manipulating his death into a poster for alimony reform is of poor taste this near to the event. Perhaps in a year, when all the facts of this case have come out, it may be appropriate to consider several high-profile divorced men who have lost…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:22 AM
3

Call your local pet rescue charities to see if anyone has found it. Edit: and I'm pretty certain that feminists didn't kill your dog.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:17 PM
1

While that's true, I don't wish for anything to be construed as suggesting that interspousal violence always has "easy ways out".
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:50 PM
15

Really, my situation was no worse than the man's was in this story. I didn't fear for my life, and I wasn't trapped. Really though, let's not start down that path. What you've been through is terrible, and some people who are victims of spousal abuse do feel trapped by a conflicting sense of loyalty. I'm glad you're not living in fear, but don't forget that you've endured a terrible thing.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:52 AM
2

If you can't win the argument, better silence the opposition. Why are you afraid of men pointing out examples of violence committed against them? The implementation of the law is not a zero-sum game. Prosecuting female-on-male violence does not suddenly make male-on-female violence ok.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:07 AM
1

TRP (Theredpill) is the MGTOW (men going their own way) subreddit: men who feel that they should cut all "traditional" ties with women. It's basically an anti-traditionalist view on dating. Personally, I feel it's sociopathic, but that's chopped liver. The MRM is concerned with the social and legal difficulties faced by men, with a view to influencing legislation towards achieving "true" gender equality. i.e: the implication is that modern society favours women in certain ways and these must be …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:20 PM
8

The article is a shameful smear piece which doesn't know the difference between Men's rights, TRP, or a PUA. Don't waste your time reading this.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:46 PM
1

The point is not to strike fear into them. The point is to impact public opinion. That's going to win much more sympathy than beating up a police officer in the street.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:03 AM
2

Far far better would be to organise a protest march on the precinct
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:41 AM
3

So? Bathroom graffiti is expected in most places, at least make it interesting. edit: and this counts as interesting, definitely moreso than "call #number# for a good time"
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:02 PM
6

You'll have to ask in every thread. There's no objective definition of feminism, only subjective ones that people consent to. It's best not to worry about it and instead figure out what feminism, equality, and human rights mean to you.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:06 AM
8

Lawyer. Libel suit.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:06 AM
114

Don't call him at home. Do make an appointment. This is good advice.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:53 AM
1

For undergrads, Southampton has about 1:3, so do you have any idea why there's such a falloff into postgraduate?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:10 PM
0

No worries, I didn't read it pre-edit. By "him" I do indeed mean Veyron, but unfortunately there seems to be a lot of identity voting going on instead of critical thinking. Edit: lol, proving my point exactly, downvote anyone who criticises the groupthink. Jolly poor show.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:59 PM
5

That wouldn't give him a free pass to make inappropriate generalisations. Debate what people say, not their circumstances.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:54 PM
11

University of Southampton. The faculty is really quite large, it includes all of the many fields of engineering too. 3/15 Professors are female. If 20% of all academic staff in the department are women, then it's easily 50 academics alone in the faculty of Physics and Engineering. Not considering support staff!
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:22 PM
23

Physics student here, with lots of involvement in engineering. This isn't a thing in my departments. If I showed this to the fifty women working in the faculty they'd all have a good giggle with me.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:49 AM
2

Lawyers often give free consultation and advice. If it ever goes to trial, it's far better to have already discussed it with a lawyer than for your first conversation to be about things you could have done differently.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:23 AM
100

He's a lesson to how it's done, always call your lawyer when shit goes down.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:33 AM
1

So does that make education like overclocking for the mind?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:28 AM
1

It's cringeworthy but I imagine I'm far removed from being the target audience of this drivel.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:32 AM
15

Ha, it's a median hourly rate, so for all we know the male interquartile range could be very much smaller than the female. Hell, the 49th percentile could be working for free and you'd never know, based on that statistic. You can't just present a measure of average without a measure of spread. I'd rather see articles like these force people to understand how to interpret a gaussian fit, rather than quoting a single figure next to a pie chart.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:48 AM
8

Having found this sub only recently, I don't know how kindly you'll take to a comment from a woman It seems to me that the sub cares more about the content of people's posts rather than what gender they state they are (let's be frank, on the internet it doesn't make much difference). If anything posts from women are welcomed because they demonstrate impartiality to an independent observer. This isn't some gentlemen's club or "safe space". It's a place for discussion and anything you have to say …
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:08 PM
1

That's a complete non-sequitur.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:24 AM
7

Rape appals me but it doesn't shame me; I've never raped anybody.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:41 PM
5

It's sad because police time was wasted investigating claims that were demonstrably false, when that time should have been spent catching real criminals. That makes the woman guilty of "wasting police time", hence the suspended prison sentence.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:07 PM
1

You do want to prosecute, because if you don't then tomorrow she's free to tell sob stories about how you 'sexually assaulted' her to people with weaker sensibilities than your solicitor. You should compile as much of your evidence as you can for your solicitor and tell them that you were a victim of repeated spousal violence. Press charges, because the next guy she meets won't know what she's done to you.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:11 PM
1

I appreciate the can of worms such affairs open, obviously the involved parties need to be ejected. However, I don't believe such "crazy dudes" are best fit for service. I understand why it makes you angry, but I just don't think it is any worse than a consensual illicit liaison between two single persons.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:48 PM
1

You should do it if you have any evidence, to make public amongst those who know the two of you that she did this to you. People need to accept the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:24 PM
1

But doesn't any relationship between personnel have similar consequences? The worst punishment this should warrant is honourable discharge.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:12 PM
44

How can anyone justify trash-talk about cancer awareness? You could have a "Stalins for screenings" day where you dress up as your favourite mass murderer* and I'd still support it. *I'd go as a tumour.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:31 PM
1

Obviously not in mine then.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 12:20 AM
1

Well, I don't mean to split hairs. They might have different meanings in your jurisdiction. However, a threat of violence is not an assault. But in this case, breaking the man's property would be criminal damage.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:36 PM
10

From the article linked in the OP; This is our movement And there you have it. The author of that article is not concerned with the betterment of humanity, but of maintaining their own little club.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:41 PM
1

Your definitions are off. It is typically stated as "Assault by Beating (Battery)". Assault is physical violence, battery is said violence performed by striking without a weapon, intentionally and recklessly. Source: I've pressed these as charges.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:16 PM
4

I don't care about replacing the banner based on gender, I care that they replaced Einstein, Dirac, Heisenberg, De Broglie et al with women I don't know about. The only person on the updated banner who is a household name is Curie, and she was already on it (of course). How the hell are people supposed to be attracted to a banner about science when all the famous scientists are taken off?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:43 AM
2

Tell all of this to whoever is in charge of your boss. Get professional legal advice, and a restraining order if she tries to contact you again. STAY AWAY FROM HER.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:47 PM
15

It is actually pretty difficult to prove a rape happened. So? That's how it should be, imagine if it were easy to get convictions for rape (or indeed any crime), it would be a return to the lynch mobs of the 19th century. Let's be real here; the burden of proof lies with the accuser to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:11 PM
4

You might want to try responding to the other comments constructively, otherwise you do appear to be baiting with your original question.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:02 PM
17

Actually, the comments seem fairly balanced.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:50 PM
1

No, you were far too puerile to be taken seriously. It's your attempt to make this childishness credible that is most incredible.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:33 AM
1

FYI I'm a guy. The fact that you feel the need to say that is very telling. Cool story bro
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:04 PM
1

While your premise is not wrong, this is a confrontational image, your conclusion is false. "Cherry picking" is not the right criticism to make. It declares that a falsehood is stated by the picked statistics. In all of the examples given, it is clear that males do not have it better than females in that respect. So it inherently cannot be cherry-picking. The image does not explicitly state "one gender has it worse that the other". Its true statement is "men are not privileged with a desirably b…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:05 AM

Can you bring sources to assert your claim that the info graphic is cherry picking its sources? It provides 9 for 5 statements, several on its most extreme claim.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:06 PM
1

Might be nice if you learned how to read, too. If you saw your former partner continually making frivolous expenditure, following increased demand for money from you, how would that make you feel? /u/dogcrazyjen has only opposed frivolous expenditure for transient benefit. I'm fairly sure that their current experience as a parent makes them well qualified to talk about financial issues.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:29 AM
1

I'm aware of that; I was speaking from the OP's perspective.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:19 AM
1

Costs aren't, expenditure is. There are two criteria meet: can OPs child have enough fiscal provision, and does OP have enough left to live on.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:42 AM
1

Some people aren't the OP. Try again: what fraction of salary is spent by blue-collar workers on their children?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:53 PM
2

But is it more than $1144 each month? That's double what he pays.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:44 PM
1

Well, consider that guardianship enforces restrictions on the minor about where they can spend the night. There's something of a conflict of interest between a minor's sexual partner and the wishes of their guardian. While they are under minor age, AoC law stands to ensure their guardian retains legal control over them. Which is of course the right thing to enshrine in law.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:09 AM
1

So you're saying persons under the age of consent have Carte Blanche to rape? I understand why you object, but I can't see any legal improvement.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:01 AM
1

Why is that an inconsistency? Age of consent is about protecting a vulnerable minor from the legal ramifications of intimacy as well as any moral or psychological argument.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:49 PM
1

I'm certain the jury will refuse to convict her. I cannot believe that there will be sufficient evidence to assert a charge of 'aggravated rape'. Merely entertaining such thoughts does a disservice to victims of rape.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:31 PM
1

The red robes and wig are part of the dress judges wear in court, in the US I believe they have a black gown.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:08 AM
1

The dude is a judge
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:18 AM
2

This. Document everything you can. As a witness, your testimony will support your Dad's case.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:16 AM
1

Splitting hairs. Vernacular is appropriate in this context in its secondary meaning.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:30 AM
6

In common vernacular, ephebophiles are paedophiles.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:34 AM
1

Of course. I just wanted you to clarify your agreement.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:50 AM
12

They could Google "men's rights", click the 6th result (us) and read our FAQ. But apparently it's more fun to crack misandrist jokes on mumsnet.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:38 AM
1

Most women will NOT falsely accuse you of rape. This subreddit has some extremely baseless paranoia about this sometimes Risk = probability x consequence. False accusations of rape can destroy lives, so no matter how infrequently they occur, they are worth being concerned about. While your voice of moderation is welcome in this discussion, you shouldn't try to dissuade people from being cautious.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:03 AM
1

Such is the subjective nature of art.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:22 PM
1

I have serious trouble believing that someone's first thought would jump to sexual favours.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:39 PM
1

Sure, if there was no competition for this 'new world', it would endure, but competition with the current world would kill it. The problem is not that no female engineers or blue collar workers exist, its that there are not enough women with the right skills to maintain 50% of the world's infrastructure. The deficiency would cause a severe drop in the standard of living as the new society adjusted.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:37 PM
3

I'm no longer able to take what you say seriously.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:13 PM
9

It needs explanation as to how it's about DV, so it ultimately failed in its message.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:31 AM
3

For once, someone is using the term appropriately.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:05 AM
3

The state would collapse very quickly, since there would be no market confidence in a state deficient in those areas. Who would they borrow from? How would the citizens be employed?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:39 AM
1

If art is neither enjoyable nor evocative, it is not art.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:30 AM
26

This is what angered me most of all. The staff are withholding a man's medical records from him in order to support a lie.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:28 AM
1

I'm British, and I can say outright that this risks dismissal for them both. It's not that they're coworkers, it's that both interactions took place in the workplace and (I infer) during work hours.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:59 AM
1

Given your first paragraph, you display a disturbing lack of empathy.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:52 AM
2

so why not? Because you could be sacked? Like I said, it's just about the exact opposite of professionalism. Also, what do you think will happen when you're no longer willing to perform these services pro bono? Matey boy is going to be fun to work with.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:49 AM
2

Because heaven forbid a man ever say those words with sincerity. And heaven forbid a girl act notably outside of culturally established 'normal' behaviours. This article is damaging to female agency and male integrity.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 12:03 AM
22

There's only one way to change this, and that's for men to take responsibility over their own dating and expect equal expenditure.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:47 PM
6

Record the events. Every time he's struck, every time you hear her insult him, any truth that he won't admit is occurring. Then confront him with the records after about a month. It that won't convince him, go to social services and report him as vulnerable.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:43 PM
7

I keep reading what you've written and keep asking myself: "why?" Why would you think performing a sex act on a colleague you have zero interest in is a good idea? In my opinion, it's neither manipulation nor persuasion, it's just poor judgement. Do you plan to keep your arrangement up forever? If anybody finds out, you could find yourself disciplined for your lack of professionalism. C'mon. (Edited because I can't into grammar)
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:02 PM
1

There are things you can do to prove the truth to them when they're older. Get written records when you try to establish contact. Put money aside for them each month if you can afford it. Record all the conversations you have with your ex-wife (assuming its legal in your jurisdiction). When your children are old enough, you'll be able to establish contact without going through her and you'll have evidence to set the record straight. Remember, you're their father for life. Please don't throw that…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:44 AM
14

Back in them days, the groups tended to congregate under labels actually related to their clear, achievable aims, such as "suffragette".
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:35 AM
1

Think if it this way. Your regular Joe/Jane will have the mental strength to ignore 95% of the bullshit. But that 5% of the time, if they have a bad day, or something happens that makes the half-baked 'advice' relevant to their circumstances, they become vulnerable and might accept this as adequate advice.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:57 AM
1

That's beside the point, the point is that having this stuff in the public domain means that otherwise sensible people could be changing their perceptions. Eventually, if they're bombarded enough times, anyone will accept that this is an acceptable way to think because "the professional advice columnist said so".
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:56 PM
5

Because the fact that people are given advice this bad is a serious problem.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:58 PM
1

Another emergency caesarean reporting in!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:12 AM
2

Naturally, hence your witticism. But you don't take it seriously, right?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:39 PM
11

How can people take that seriously and exhibit any response that isn't disgust?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:35 PM
3

Well you see, the OP linked to a thread where you can read straight from the horse's mouth. You back up your claims with nothing but as hominem.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:30 PM
1

Presumably if there are witnesses who will support you, you can put them on the phone if they don't believe you. If the bouncers witness the false accusation, they could be witnesses to the false accuser's ID. Then you could report at a police station in person.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:35 PM
2

I don't know how the law works in your jurisdiction, but in mind it's only a crime to intentionally waste police time. Reporting someone falsely alleging a crime in public would fall under "public order offences".
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:27 PM
4

The article is mainstream coverage of both the problems this sub stands against and has cited the same evidence commonly cited on this sub. You don't have to like Cosmo magazine to accept that the article is a great step forward.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:06 PM
4

Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:01 PM
6

Get off Reddit and get a lawyer, then call any family members in state who will support you. Don't leave the house until you've spoken with a lawyer, make sure you talk through the legal impact of leaving the house (some jurisdictions will look upon you as if you are abandoning the house, even if you're fleeing violence).
/r/MensRights09/07/13 10:52 PM
1

I haven't seen any evidence of her complaints, and I dismiss them because I can't comment on them. I won't ever know if the allegation is true or false. I told you I was cynical towards her accusation because she did not report it to the police. You haven't commented on that point. That's not hubris. The case here isn't criminal That's true, but sexual assault is a crime under Canadian law. This case here has potential ramifications in court. But if the case isn't yet in court, why should the ac…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:45 AM
1

I'm not connected to MTA in any way so I couldn't possibly comment about the identities of the people involved. Let me just say that I think the smartest course of action would be to call the police, as the accuser is alleging a serious crime. The campus authorities would then be notified through the official channels on her behalf.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:33 AM
8

You should read her criticisms. They're actually pretty reasonable and articulate. Mostly they have to do with process and not outcome. *Edit: That's ignoring the fact that sexual assault is a crime under Canadian law and the Police should have been made aware of the alleged crime by the accuser. Why didn't she call the police if she had evidence that such a serious crime had taken place? This underpins my cynicism toward the accusation. She chose the wrong process to start with. Interesting. Sh…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:46 AM

Perhaps OP has some sources that might give us a glimmer's chance at telling what really happened, but I doubt it. I for one am not eager to crucify a possible sexual assault victim over the internet without a shred of evidence either way. But you see, that's just the thing. Nobody wants to crucify anyone for allegations of crime. The problem is that the campus authorities were crucified when they did their jobs in closing the investigation once it became clear that there was zero evidence to co…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:12 AM
1

Not doing a good job proving me wrong. Really, if my views are so far from the truth, why can't you prove that? Why haven't you?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:57 PM
1

source Specifically in federal cases, perjury is subject to 3 years limitation in the state of Florida and 10 years in the state of Rhode Island. 5 years in all other states. I presume that puts you entirely in the clear, but don't take my word from it, speak to legal counsel before you consider apologising. I don't want to have you screwed over for doing what you feel is right.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 01:01 AM
2

You seem to me like a perfectly conscientious individual, and your posts here give an impression that you're somehow trying to atone for mistakes you may or may not have made as a child. Good on you, I don't doubt your sincerity and it does credit to your character. However, you have to accept that you were a child when the events transpired. You can't remember the events because the hippocampus is significantly smaller during early childhood. There's nothing you can do to change that. Whatever …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:56 AM
1

Come now. You don't have any evidence to back your argument so you just insult me. Burden of proof is on you to find evidence of a UK epidemic of false rape accusations. false accusations exact MASSIVE tolls on those accused, most of which are extrajudicial, aka, damage to their reputation, job loss, relationship breakdown, loss of children, violent assault, etc. Under UK law it's illegal to dismiss a person form employment based on the accusation of crime, as is interpersonal violence. The fact…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:10 PM
1

If you can't source your allegations, you stand in exactly the same position as a person alleging a crime. Either you can present some evidence to prove that false allegations of rape are frequent and systematically under-reported, or what you say will be held to be false. Don't you understand? You can't have it both ways, a person alleging rape has to prove that they were raped, you also have to prove that there are persons who falsely report rape. That's how UK law operates.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:22 PM
1

You're wrong to include "probably not" as a response. A false allegation is not perjury. Maintaining that before any legal proceeding with the power to convict is perjury.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:14 PM
-1

That depends on the severity of the offense, if it gets to any judicial proceeding, it legally becomes perjury. False Rape accusations are a HUGE problem, even in the UK, and the 'studies' done into it are done in such a way as to minimize the apparent frequency, not find out the truth. Source please?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 11:49 PM
1

They were both drunk. You can't presume he was innocent and she was guilty, that's not how policing works. The fact of the matter is that they were both arrested, he was non-compliant and yelled about how they "only arrest the guys" when his wife was arrested as well. He sounds like a drunken idiot to me.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:14 PM
3

Why is this being downvoted? Quote from the article: Both are in country prison for aggravated and simple assault charges with high bails. Hers is $30,000, his $70,000 because male Idol fans are considered to be way more dangerous than a female. (Actually, he was described at the scene as "argumentative," shouting how police "only arrest the guys.") The emphasis the title of this post is misleading because it doesn't fully quote the article. Within the parentheses it clearly states that the arre…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 10:05 PM
2

Follow this advice. Speak to a solicitor about how you are the primary care giver, and if she ever takes you to court you'll have a wealth of evidence. Keep some sort of record of the care you provide. Family photos of you all eating breakfast, any outings you take them on, receipts, whatever. Document your relationship with your children as best as you can.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 09:58 PM
4

The best revenge you could have is to live a successful life and use your legal rights to try to establish contact with your child however you can. Once your child becomes an adult there is nothing the mother can do to stop them contacting you. You should think up a creative way to document your attempts to make contact, so that if the mother blocks you one way or another, when the child is older you can prove that you weren't a deadbeat who walked out and never made contact because the mother w…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 09:52 PM
3

Either you think retaliation is fine, which makes his retaliation fine a non-issue, or you think retaliation is bad and they both deserve the same punishment. Either way, further retaliation is absolutely unjustified.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:07 PM
1

Yes, and Jesus also taught that nobody was sinless. Since nobody is sinless, only God has the right to judge. It's not a question of living up to a standard, it's that judgement is removed form God's desires upon the world. Jesus' teachings elevate mercy above justice. In the same way, my original point; that Christians need to be merciful towards their neighbours whose lifestyles they do not agree with. As my sins are not the same as your sins, if I pick the speck out of your eye, I miss the pl…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:29 PM
3

Absolutely in agreement with you. "Judge not, lest that ye be judged".
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:07 PM
7

Just because someone invents a potential double-meaning out of thin air or adds words of his own choosing to a sentence does NOT automatically mean it's true. Of course, but they're still able to invent that double meaning. That double meaning can whip up opposition from people with poor critical reasoning abilities. By selecting your phrasing carefully, you can prevent people from twisting your words and making you out to be the bad guy.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:54 PM
3

Hey, there's no need to take it as a personal attack. I'm just trying to point out why he made the post he did, because it is possible to read your original post with the unfortunate implication. There are plenty of less scrupulous people than you in the world who would use that kind of ambiguity to twist well-intentioned comments like yours into something they are not. We're all just trying to look out for one another here.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:36 PM
26

Have a read of the parable of the Good Samaritan. Jews and Samaritans had the same relationship homosexual people and fundamentalist Christians have today. Jesus said to love your neighbour, something which so many Christians today seem to miss the significance of. I really hope this girl didn't start these allegations and that these friends are responsible.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:15 PM
15

That's a much better way of putting it. Don't take what he said the wrong way, he's just pointing out an ambiguity which has an unfortunate implication.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:09 PM
2

I love your name.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter