TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Popsiclestix1234 Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by Popsiclestix1234 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Sorry my time allocated for listening to people who are happy but still complaining and refusing to follow procedures that will resolve their complaints has been used up. This is not a gendered problem. This is a crybaby problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 02:57 AM
3

Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 09:04 PM
5

Sorry my time allocated for listening to people who are happy but still complaining and refusing to follow procedures that will resolve their complaints has been used up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:59 PM
3

I LIKE MY JOB. No you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:46 PM
4

No you don't. You just complained about the sexism at your job.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:44 PM
4

Gender is a protected class in the constitution. If the HR department fires you for complaining about valid sexism, you literally have a multi-million dollar case and you'd never need a paycheck again after that. But of course you just like to complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:40 PM
2

I'm in main and I'm in charge of knowing all the machines. Also the one's that aren't in main. And the people on other sites know their shit too. When they have a question, it's not an easy answer, not even for me. Again, I have the same problem. My coworkers know I build and maintain the systems on this side of the business unit. But they always send questions to my boss. This is not evidence of a sexism, it is evidence of a subordinate/boss relationship! And my boss does exactly the same thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:28 PM
2

I can't even imagine that. Like you need to massively know your shit for the questions they ask. Nobody here would consider asking a manager technical questions. This is not correct. There are managers who know nothing about technical questions but because they want all client questions fielded through them for the business relationship. Similarly there are clients who only want to deal with the one who has the ultimate resposibility for the whole relationship (i.e. your boss). No. Male co-worke…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:13 PM
2

No. My boss is not a technical engineer. He's a manager. He can't answer their questions. He just comes along to refer them to me. This is the same case for my boss. People ask him the technical questions anyways. With me, you are assuming that I can't notice that there are male co-workers that don't need the boss to come along. Or other obvious signs. If I was a male, you wouldn't assume female hysterics of sexism. Of course I can't, you haven't described any situations where your male coworker…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:06 PM
4

All you've described is that people prefer to talk to your boss. Whether that's because he's the one perceived as in charge or that you are female isn't clear. Your boss is probably tired of hearing those questions so he hints that they should talk to you, but there's no proof this is a gendered problem. My boss also fields all the questions even though I'm the one who actually wrote the software that solves our business needs. Is it racial discrimination because he's a different race from me?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 06:24 PM
1

But just perhaps if you guys stopped ignoring women who give you well considered responses (even if you don’t like them) it could have made a small positive difference to yours. Men: I can't get a girlfriend. Women please help! Women: Be nice to women. Men: I'm already nice regardless. But I ain't got a girlfriend. Women: You guys are being nice to get a girlfriend. That's not being nice. 2 Is just misinformed advice if we're charitable here. And we're telling you to stop saying that. Guys main …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 09:37 PM
1

The only thing a man can gate keep is his money, his time, his resources. I mean that's what he commits right? So if he gatekeep and refuse to give those things, then he is gatekeeping his commitment no?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:16 PM
1

I don't respond to people who don't debate in good faith. Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:51 PM
1

let me define IOI to cater to my specific expectations and then try to prove my point with the definition I just made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:44 PM
1

You didn't even attempt to define it and then made claims on it. If you dont like my definition then propose one yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:37 PM
1

What requirements? Let's define pursuit: A party which offers a proposal (hereforth known as pursuer) and a party which accepts or rejects said proposal (hereforth known as pursued). How is an IOI equivalent to offering a proposal?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:26 PM
1

I have no opinion on either way. All I'm saying is that we currently don't have a dating market free of governmental interference.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:25 PM
–

Nah there is a competing factor. She just hid it well. That factor is that you must look like Idris Elba. SMDH this is a god damn moderator account.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 03:10 PM
–

Blue pill just means anyone who thinks red pill is stupid. Blue pill is not the set of people who think red pill is stupid. Believe it or not there are people who don't subscribe to red pill's manipulative sexual strategies or blue pill's women are wonderful ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:59 PM
1

You aren't saying anything that the OP isn't saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:07 AM
1

You absolutely can't. If a gun is loaded, you literally physically cannot disassemble most of them. At some point you have to treat the gun as unloaded to take the actions to disassemble it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:04 AM
1

It's is accurate. The point she's trying to get across is that male sexuality is dangerous to women. The metaphor is about the hunter/hunted dynamic, nothing else No it's not accurate. Men aren't "hunting" and women aren't "hunted".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:01 AM
0

Every lion is a zebra predator though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:56 AM
0

It's a metaphor, jesus. It's an inaccurate metaphor, jesus. It's accurate in the sense that women need to be cautious of male sexuality No, it's inaccurate because in the metaphor, lions's only view of zebras is as food all the time, but the OP's claim is that men do not view women as sex objects all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:38 AM
1

Do you buy new guns every time you finish firing them? You can't clean your guns if you treat your guns as loaded all the time. https://blog.cheaperthandirt.com/guns-loaded/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:34 AM
1

Which is why the gun and zebra analogies are inaccurate analogies...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:13 AM
0

This kind of uncharitable assumptions is how we got the manipulative strategies with FDS and TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:11 AM
1

You can't clean your guns if you treat your guns as loaded all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 01:01 AM
0

You don't treat all guns as loaded all the time. Only the ones you don't know are unloaded. Lions treat zebras as food all the time though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 12:52 AM
0

This is a terrible analogy because all lions want from zebras IS food, but as the OP says, sex is not all that men want from women. You are proving OP's point that ladies don't understand that "sex isn't all men want".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 12:40 AM
1

I think what we’re actually saying is dont HAVE a “strategy” to have sex with women And you are wrong. We can see that there is a strategy to "persuade" women to have sex with us. It's the core of TRP and it works. and specifically don’t use “being nice” as that strategy Well no shit, that's what we've been saying this the entire thread, but this is what women tell us how we can get a girlfriend. because if you’re being nice to have sex you aren’t really being nice. No "nice" men I know are bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 11:55 PM
1

We all have turned down men whom we found attractive but weren't genuinely nice. This doesn't disagree with my statement. The only statement that would be a counterpoint here is that if you and your friends have turned down ALL guys who don't have niceness trait. Otherwise niceness is not a necessary trait to get sex. In my observation, the vast majority of women do not require "niceness" traits from men to have sex with them - only sexual attraction - so it is disingenuous to advise men to "be …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 11:14 PM
–

There's literally a term specifically for guys who fuck ugly women, dumpster diving. It may as well be the couch for all he cares. If the couch were actually a suitable alternative to fucking an woman they find attractive, we wouldn't have all the incels crying about getting no sex. Marriage is simping lol. That's not what I observe my happily married friends do (male) or receive (female). But you can believe what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 08:39 PM
–

We're not talking about turned on, or boners. Men walk around with boners for no reason at all when they are young. We're talking about actually wanting to fuck. The amount of men actually willing to fuck curvy couches is an argument ad absurdum. He isn't actually attracted to a woman unless he's willing to simp for her. FDS fantasy lol. Most happily married couples I know don't simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 08:23 PM
–

How so? Keeping in mind that just because a guy is willing to fuck her doesn't mean he finds her attractive. What???? Willing to fuck her is the definition of (sexually) attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 08:16 PM
3

My only point is that regulations affect marriage, and since some forms of dating have goals to be in a marriage: Regulations which affect marriage necessarily are also regulations which affect dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:55 PM
3

Marriage is post dating. After. Except marriage is a thing you agree to do when you are dating. It doesn't happen in a vacuum. How the environment for marriage and how the other party acts in the course of dating affects whether or not I marry the other person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:45 PM
4

Dating is like market, and you can´t "try" to reach equality without regulations. So, if people defend that, they are literally talking about laws for dating. I mean we have regulations about marriage which is the result of some forms of dating so we already have regulations that affect dating...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:31 PM
0

Being genuinely nice is a necessary but insufficient trait to get sex. Except that's complete bullshit. Women give out sex to men who aren't nice, so niceness is not a necessary trait to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:18 PM
2

It's written like I intended. How you interpret it depends on whether you believe "friend-zone" exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 06:21 PM
2

Nobody gets fuck-zoned just like nobody gets friend-zoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 06:09 PM
2

Well regardless of whether it is sarcasm or not, to put real numbers behind it: President currently makes $400k/yr while in office and then a pension of $219.2k/yr after they leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 06:02 PM
2

Came here just to say this. Basically every argument she makes she tries to introduce an obvious strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 03:57 PM
–

What this whole comment section has taught me is that people who consider other people "losers" are losers².
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 03:27 PM
1

Most women subscribe to the benefits of feminism and don't even concsiously know they are feminists imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 02:22 PM
1

would get fixed almost magically if especially men waited with sex until marriage. This isn't nuanced enough. The problems would only get fixed if every women made all men wait until marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 01:51 PM
1

If porn = ED = can't get off, then guys who have problems with premature ejaculation (which is the MOST common form of sexual dysfunction in men) should watch more porn right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 01:22 PM
10

And that would be absolutely fine.... as long as they meet the same high level of standards themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/20 05:51 PM
3

I don't/won't be having children so it's not a fucking problem for me. But who the fuck cares? What you decide to teach your daughter about personal safety is your problem. But you better teach your daughter to properly assign blame to rapists and not men or you are going to get downvotes.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 10:12 PM
3

Not having the same problems as another group is not a privilege. But call it what you want, it wouldn't change the fact.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 09:55 PM
2

Except that's not what the picture you are agreeing with is about. "Male privilege is letting workers into your home without fear". Privilege is about advantages gained from oppression. Men aren't oppressing women by walking into their homes. The picture wants to blame the entire gender for the work of a few bad apples.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 09:44 PM
4

I can't understand why I'm getting downvotes. You are conflating fear (an emotion which the subject has the agency to control) with privilege of an entire group gets by oppressing another group. Males aren't oppressing females by raping them when females allow them into their homes. Some bad males are oppressing some females by raping them when allowed into their homes. The rapists are privileged. Not men.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 09:27 PM
0

The boundary of consent is action, not words. The GP said that he wanted to have a girl tell him she wants to suck his dick, not actually do that. It's not the worse feeling to hear that. What is the worse feeling is when people ignore your boundaries and act on it, but that's not what the GP was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 02:51 PM
3

I'm curious about how you became well-adjusted socially if you spent 100% of your waking hours studying to avoid lashings?
/r/TheRedPill27/04/16 06:07 AM
0

Miata Is Always The Answer
/r/TheRedPill27/04/16 05:59 AM
2

The juice (marriage) is not worth the squeeze.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 04:29 PM
2

Self-reporting bias. Some people are aware of this and so they rate themselves with a huge variance to account for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 04:54 PM
1

Risk is grossly overinflated by the media. Do some research and find some reviews (ECCIE is a great site) and you'll find out the risks are next to negligible.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 05:52 PM
1

Just don't proclaim it as such.
/r/askTRP11/12/15 02:17 PM
1

Well just because she is texting some other guy doesn't mean she is necessarily cheating, unless you count emotional validation as cheating (then you might as well ban all guys from her life). Girls will always have tons of orbiters. The real problem here sounds like that you aren't getting laid. It's time to put on some real dread game or simply leave.
/r/askTRP01/12/15 01:41 PM
1

Seen it. I'll let the other guy argue the point since he seems more invested in it, I was merely commenting since his rebuttal to your point wasn't very clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 04:01 PM
2

most men in average had more sexual partners than women Average generally doesn't mean much in statistics. If 10 men each slept with the same 100 women and 90 men are virgins, then it would seem like the men are on average sleeping with 10 women. What you want is median (aka, the average man, the 50th percentile, etc), which in this would be virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 03:30 PM
0

You presume to speak for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 09:44 PM
0

I think some men look hot. I have never looked at a man who was hot and immediately wanted sex with him. Just doesn't work that way. So what you're saying is that you wouldn't do Brad Pitt if he propositioned you until you got to know him? Also, how do you explain getting laid on the first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 08:57 PM
1

You don't think that a significant proportion of the betas will seek the services of professionals and that it is good for them to know the risks and mitigations?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 04:48 PM
28

The interesting thing is that cars can be fixed. Frames can be pulled straight, engines can be rebuilt, transmissions can be swapped if it is worth it. Nothing can be done to fix a broken woman.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 12:57 PM
10

He asked me "are you happy" and I replied "yes", so he said "okay, that's it."
/r/askTRP24/10/15 11:27 PM
3

I'm curious as to why you think this one has any sexual interest in you at all. Because according what you have written she brought a friend along on a date and then she rejected your attempts at another. Also she's using you for emotional validation about her boss and you're falling for it.
/r/askTRP23/10/15 01:25 PM
2

Offers no NEW useful information. What it does do is reaffirm a theory that doesn't really need reaffirmation.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:15 PM
1

why is that e.g. every single Formula 1 pilot (or other racecar driver) has huge amounts of alpha swag That's because as an F1 driver you must have HUGE amounts of balls to pilot that thing inches away from your opponents going 200 mph. yet they are thin. The reason why they are thin is because it saves weight and weight is KING in racing. To consider how extreme they go to saving weight, even the steering wheel is made in carbon fiber and that couldn't possible save more than a pound over alumi…
/r/askTRP21/10/15 02:35 PM
3

Be as beta as possible.
/r/askTRP26/09/15 07:07 PM
3

mythical being, exceedingly rare If it is mythical, it isn't rare. It simply does not exist.
/r/MGTOW24/09/15 11:44 PM
2

Feminists will tell you that it doesn't matter who has drank the milk before you.
/r/MGTOW24/09/15 11:40 PM
2

My cat will only stand by me when I feed her.
/r/MGTOW21/09/15 02:09 PM
2

It's not that the nice guy doesnt know how to say "no". It's that the nice guy has been taught all his life by women that this is how he gets a woman to be attracted to him.
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 04:22 AM
3

Personally I feel like it is a HUGE waste of my time to go through the motions to have sex with a woman. When my urges happen I come read MGTOW and TRP and get completely disgusted with women and my urges go away.
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 04:10 AM
1

I disagree with both you and OP. You don't buy a new car because you shouldn't pay the "drive it off the lot" depreciation, which typically is 15-20%. But you also shouldn't buy a 7-8 year old car because you dont know the car's previous owner's driving habits. And even a car with a complete service history from the dealer isn't fully maintained. For example, most people dont know you're really supposed to flush the brake fluid every year and the coolant every 3 years or so. Modern cars also spe…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 09:03 AM
2

Tried to report as spam (the facebook thing), button didn't do anything.
/r/MGTOW28/08/15 08:38 AM
2

No I'm saying not to give the hope that leaving orbiter status will get her sexually interested.
/r/MGTOW24/08/15 01:29 AM
1

I am guilty of doing things for women in the past myself to try and win their favor. I should have stated that I've done so in the past, albeit I walked after a short time if I realized it wasn't working. It's the chronic, table-dog, waiting for scraps--behaviors I see where men just keep coming back (orbiting) for more active and/or passive-manipulation that's pathetic to see. Almost all of us who haven't been slaying pussy since we were 15 have been there, it takes an extremely strong mental f…
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 10:14 PM
2

I don't know what's more pathetic, these dips**t white knighting douches thinking they're going to "win her over" to get in her pants, or her passively manipulating them as tools with self-deceptive hampstering. I dont think that WKs are pathetic in the sense that they've been lied to about their entire lives about how to get into a woman's pants. It's hard to act otherwise. At least they mean what they say and act accordingly. Women's duplicitous behavior on the other hand, is simply inexcusabl…
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 07:02 AM
2

A lack of a father figure does not excuse women from having agency and responsibility in their actions. This is not completely men's fault. We don't excuse serial killers because "circumstance".
/r/MGTOW22/08/15 04:26 PM
7

The WTF is that all this behavior is completely irrational. Just because we can understand the psychology of a serial killer doesn't mean we can excuse it. The same applies for women.
/r/MGTOW22/08/15 03:41 PM
2

I disagree. Women are cognizant that their orbiters want to get into their pants but will never let them but will keep leading the orbiters on.
/r/MGTOW22/08/15 03:34 PM
11

the government hasn't passed the "forced beta marriage to used up women" legislation yet. So what do you call this IRS raping my wallet because I'm single bullshit then?
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 11:18 PM
2

I find the best way to stop all these "you must be rich" and "nice cars" comments is to NEVER wash your car. It's better for your paint anyways. (Ok, well maybe scrape the bird poop since it'll eat into the clearcoat and clean the windows and mirrors every once in a while for safety reasons).
/r/MGTOW22/07/15 01:21 PM
1

I will say as a gearhead the Lexus will statistically being a more reliable (less unscheduled maintenance) ownership experience. But why do you want an RC-F? The RC350 is plenty of power for someone coming from shitboxes, more fuel efficient and the same luxury level.
/r/MGTOW20/07/15 02:16 PM
2

A 911 is significantly more expensive than a Q60 or an RC-F.
/r/MGTOW20/07/15 02:12 PM
1

Doesnt look shadowbanned to me. But you should really use /r/shadowban to check.
/r/MGTOW13/07/15 06:01 AM
1

I daily drive a 2004 Mazdaspeed Miata, I've always been told it's a girl's or gay person's car. IDGAF. I bought it because it's cheap, easy to work on, and pretty much the best handling vehicle on the planet. I also have a 2012 Lexus IS350 for those times when I need a more "sensible" vehicle. This vehicle I bought because of the legendary reliability of Toyota/Lexus vehicles. We've owned 4 generations of Camry in my family before I bought this vehicle and they were all going super strong at 250…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 05:12 PM
6

In a follow-up article published the next day, Nikkan Gendai undertook a “kosupa” breakdown, hypothetically comparing two men employed in the auto sales industry, one a lifelong bachelor and the other a man who marries at age 30 and fathers two children. Although the overall cost of raising each child exceeds 30 million yen, the married man is still projected to have total assets of 27.19 million yen at age 65, as opposed to the bachelor’s 24.11 million yen. And at age 85, the married man will h…
/r/MGTOW18/06/15 03:28 PM
1

Paintball and work on my car.
/r/MGTOW06/06/15 11:11 PM
13

Kids do this shit all the time. They dont want to get into trouble and they think they can get away with it. Read Sidebar about "Most responsible teenager"
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 04:02 AM
10

You totally missed the point. An alpha doesn't need to make fun of other people. That's just about the unmanliest thing I can think of. Only little children make fun of each other.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 02:02 PM
-12

Such alpha, making fun of people who don't know better to make yourself feel better.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 01:53 PM
0

If you are buying it as a status symbol, then I'm going to have to disappoint you that a 4 series isn't all that impressive... however if you a car enthusiast, bmws handle well and are reasonably expensive to maintain if you don't mind DIY the easy items (fluids, brakes, etc). I myself drive a Lexus IS350 with suspension and boltons mods and take her out about once a month to autocross or track and find her much more rewarding than American women anyways.
/r/askTRP06/05/15 12:10 AM
1

And nothing you said is a lawful defense against assault.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 02:40 PM
10

"I miss that sweet puss." is what you should text back.
/r/askTRP21/04/15 01:55 PM
1

Such a cost-inefficient way of picking up chicks though :\ Unless that car's primary duty is for the racetrack, that's a waste of such a nice car. Come to think of it, I'd rather be at the racetrack than picking up chicks anyways.
/r/askTRP19/01/15 04:54 AM
1

My naturally Alpha friend the other day asked what he should buy for his next car. He was looking to replace his Acura TL (invoice ~$40k) that he bought specifically because he thought a luxury vehicle would help him pick up chicks. He claimed it made no difference in his success rates with chicks, but at least it was nice driving to work in comfort. Then again, the 2005 Acura TL looks Camry boring.
/r/askTRP19/01/15 04:51 AM
0

No, its her benefits. The benefits (sex) come from her. They are very equivalent. A man's benefits come from his resources (time and material). Likewise, a woman's benefit comes from her body (sex). This is where the whole gatekeeper of sex vs gatekeeper of commitment come from. I don't feel bad doing exactly the equivalent of what the other party will if the tables were turned.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 11:18 PM
1

Correct, but the law seems rather unjust in this case.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:55 PM
2

Agreed with what you said. I'm mostly angry with the law (and feminism's influence that enacted these laws), not the woman who is turning down the $1bn for more.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:54 PM
-1

I totally don't agree with the student loans advice. The problem isn't that student loans are bad because private companies give them out and the government guarantees them. The problem is that borrowers don't use that money wisely. I borrowed $30k via student loans and went to the best public university in the state for my major. The difference between me and most of the other borrowers that are now drowning in debt is that I choose a marketable degree (engineering) and I didn't piss away my un…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:50 PM
10

Women have no issues with stringing beta guys along for their (material/time) benefits so I don't see any problem with OP stringing a woman along for her (sexual) benefits.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:41 PM
9

The rationale behind alimony is to compensate the women for her lost opportunities in career advancement because she choose to be the spouse to take care of the house/children/whatever. I highly doubt this woman could have made $1bn on her own, let alone $9bn (50% of his supposed net worth).
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 08:39 PM
9

Agree, there's nothing amazing about a woman able to open her legs.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 01:47 PM
1

No, because if you don't own a house, you have an extra 200K+ to invest in other things.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 09:26 PM
1

The underlying principle of the guideline IS abundance mentality. I'm not changing the definition of anything.
/r/askTRP26/11/14 09:20 PM
1

The ratio is to show (real or fake) that you are busy living your awesome life which she does not dictate. It has nothing to do with how many women you are sleeping with. Nowhere did I mention that abundance mentality has anything to do with how many women you are sleeping with. Abundance mentality is exactly what you said: "busy with living your awesome life". A man will text when he wants, what he wants, however much or little he wants. Betas text when they want, as much as they want. Seems li…
/r/askTRP26/11/14 09:05 PM
1

Unicorns are a MYTH. By definition they cannot exist.
/r/askTRP26/11/14 08:44 PM
2

Abundance mentality =/= Text ratio of 2/3. Your advice has nothing to do with "the golden ratio" Are you kidding me? You really think people take this 2/3 shit literally? The point of the 2/3 texts guideline is to project alpha and not be beta faggot shit and send her 600 texts about how you liked having sex with her. Alphas are aloof and with options. It gives her the tingles since you are scarce and therefore "special". Which is unsurprisingly what abundance mentality projects.
/r/askTRP26/11/14 08:33 PM
1

You've clearly never OWNED a house then. They have pros and cons. It's not just as simple as "own house" > "not own house"
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 08:27 PM
2

I think the important thing here is abundance mentality. Always end the conversation on your terms and leave her wanting more. It's not meant to be taken literally.
/r/askTRP26/11/14 08:20 PM
0

owning a house > not owning a house irrespective of other variables. Again, no. Owning a house will not increase your success with women you want, you need redpill for that. All owning a house does is just attracts a bunch of gold-digging whores, which is actually a disadvantage. I know from experience.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 08:17 PM
0

Yeah, no. It doesn't matter even if you 100% own your house before 26 if you are blue-pill as fuck as most men are.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 07:20 PM
1

There's some ambiguity here. Not sure if you are against house ownership or against mortgages. I own my own house and against being a debtor.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 07:19 PM
3

Knowledge is power. Ignorance is bliss.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/14 02:01 AM
1

AWALT. Not "AWALT but your cousin". Bullshit is a result of her hamster and solipsism. So all women bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 04:34 PM
1

I don't know why you are being down voted to oblivion. In fact, I propose that in highly abstract and technical fields, competence is negatively correlated to grammar. Half my math and engineering professors don't speak or write a lick of decent english but they demonstrate their subject-area competence repeatedly in their teachings and works-published. They don't have time to be bothered with bullshit like grammar because their audience aren't a bunch of grammar nazis and are able to understand…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 08:32 AM
1

So you've got all the ones to eights he attracts left to game for yourself, since if he's really red pill he will stick to his nines. I'm probably going to be down voted for this but I feel this is incorrect. My friend who is naturally an 8 will pull every girl from 5+ and up. It's actually sort of depressing sometimes.
/r/askTRP12/11/14 12:16 AM
6

But today we have women who exploit said contract. Men offer themselves up and they see those men as a platter of goods they've earned. They take all the parts they want and leave the rest, knowing the man has intentions or desires that go beyond mere association. I do have to ask though, should this "social contract" exist in today's society? It seems clear to me that women have overwhelming rejected this contract, but the question is why?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:51 PM
5

I feel you. Been there myself. Multiple times. When women drop the "Let's just be friends" line, most of them aren't interested in actually being in a mutual caring platonic relationship. What they are more interested is more like a religious relationship (you worship her). You get to provides everything she wants (listen to all her feelings and shit), and you get nothing you are looking for in a platonic friendship (loyalty, respect, fellowship, support, etc...) What woman doesn't want to be wo…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter