TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Popular-Cabinet-3039 Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by Popular-Cabinet-3039 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

“Prove to me that you actually have trauma” is not a request for open dialogue, you literally admitted you wanted to judge her. This is specifically what males to do women, especially around sexual assault and gendered violence. Being judged is a consequence of being equal. If women do not want to be judged, then they cannot be equal to men, under any circumstances. It’s not a popularity contest, I’m just reminded that the rest of us are normal. You’re a female Redditor that became a janitor for…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:57 PM
-2

An egalitarian frame of mind like yours is admirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:49 PM
-2

I’m not pearl clutching I’m letting you know how bizarre your request was, it’s like so devoid of human social norms I don’t even know what it is. Men discuss their experiences with violence openly. Should women be held to a different, unequal standard? getting ratio’d This isn’t a popularity contest. Don’t project your need for external validation onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:48 PM
1

The ones upon which one bases their understanding of the world. This is your opportunity to shine a light on how threatening men were toward you, and to provide actual value to a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:44 PM

Don’t talk to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:43 PM
-2

So “traumatic” that she glibly and casually answered my first question without a hint of trouble. She’s welcome to know the story of when a man threatened to shoot me if she wants it. I’m certainly not going to pearl clutch and shut down open discussion like you’re doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:42 PM
1

No, it isn’t. I’ll tell a story of the time a man threatened to shoot me if you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:40 PM
-2

I’m not holding a gun to her head. She could’ve easily ignored my first question if it was so traumatic, but didn’t. Acquiring knowledge allows one to check their premises.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:39 PM
2

Acquiring knowledge allows one to check their premises.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:38 PM
1

You asked to look at my sweaty balls while I work out naked. You may not be a cheater, but most people would be put off to hear that their spouse did something like that. And telling a coworker you’re attracted to him when you’re married is insane behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:37 PM
-15

It’s not a trick question. I’m gathering information, as one who cares about the truth does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:28 PM
-24

Describe the threats, including setting and dialogue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:23 PM
4

Being “The World’s _____est Man” carries with it status. And in terms of sheer numbers, it exposes him to many more women than he otherwise would be. This isn’t rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:19 PM
-7

Men aren’t as neurotic, and they aren’t indoctrinated to fear men like women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:17 PM
-7

How many times has a man threatened to shoot you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:17 PM
1

You’re clearly very upset. I’ll leave you to have the last work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:15 PM
1

I accurately ascribed cowardice to cowardly actions. As a woman, society will tolerate and celebrate your cowardice. The only consequence is that men with integrity, like me, will judge your actions negatively. This is a consequence of equality: being judged for your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:15 PM
1

That’s not a personal attack. Words have meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:12 PM
2

This just in: the world isn't perfect and people are going to say things neither of us likes. Except the privileged sex heavily enforces its own biases through a mixture of censorship and tone policing. Men are expected to just take it, and if a man has the audacity to object to being villainized, it’s used as proof of his villainy against him. Men will care what women think of their language when women can act like equal adults instead of endlessly tone policing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:09 PM
2

The vagina naturally lubricates as it self regulates and cleans. In other words, women are often wet during rape. Why are you arguing with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:06 PM
1

Personal attacks mean you lose the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:05 PM
1

That’s not what cowardice means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:05 PM
1

You made it personal when you called women cowardly for valuing their personal safety over undeserved and hypothetical clarity for men. That’s not what a personal attack is. And lying to avoid an outcome you’re afraid of is textbook cowardice. Also, you care enough to try to shame women for not answering why. I don’t shame anyone. I state facts, and women get upset about them. Probably a result of their coddled upbringings.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:04 PM
1

You’re not having fun. You’re upset, and using personal attacks (something that women aren’t punished for on PPD, as the privileged sex) as a salve for your ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:03 PM
1

Many do. You yourself admit lacerations are not ubiquitous.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:49 PM
0

Personal attacks mean you lose the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:48 PM
0

You’re very upset, and deep in your feelings. You refuted nothing. Don’t be a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:47 PM
1

You don’t know anything about me, which means your personal attacks are a result of hurt feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:45 PM
0

I have never in my life asked a woman “why” after she rejected me. I don’t care. Unlike women, apparently, I am capable of having opinions on things that don’t personally affect me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:17 PM
0

Your odds of being divorced go up by 50% when your wife gets a promotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:14 PM
1

You can win both.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:11 PM
0

No matter how many times you claim it’s dishonest, it is not dishonest. “I don’t want to date you” is NOT a lie. I didn’t say it is. If you have to erect a straw man to argue with me because you’re too weak to argue with what I actually said, then concede the argument. And if you ask why, “because I don’t want to” is also not a lie. It is a lie, because it’s circular logic, and therefore wrong. Just don’t reply instead of being a liar. And you know this. You know you don’t have to give some rand…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:25 PM
2

My favorite story of couples therapy is the woman whose therapist began FaceBook stalking her husband while spending every session complimenting him and telling her how to be a “better wife.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:16 PM

Because she holds herself to low standards, as do most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:14 PM
3

That kind of emotional volatility isn’t conducive to being on a debate sub. You are not someone worth talking to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:11 PM
1

Personal attacks veiled as innocuous questions are the kind of passive aggression typical of someone that does not value integrity, particularly when those questions are meant to provoke while shifting the responsibility of instigation onto the insulted party. You lose the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:02 PM
2

Actually, I just analyzed your language, and the results aren’t good. Goose/gander. Since you aren’t arguing in good faith, I have no reason to talk to you. You may have the last word.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:01 PM
0

I don’t affiliate with soft people. Sounds like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:00 PM
0

You’re not obligated to be honest, just as you’re not obligated to be a good person. Especially as a member of the more privileged sex. But members of the less privileged sex are free to judge you for your decision to be dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:59 PM
-4

“I’m not interested” is honest. Just don’t lie if asked why. Answer honestly or don’t answer at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:59 PM
-3

You aren’t LISTENING to the no. You aren’t really considering the reason. Here, fine, it’s a debate, but my decision to decline a date is NOT a debate subject to discussion with the guy. No one said it needed to be. Just don’t be a liar. They certainly won’t take what we say to heart. So there is NO point. Why should I continue a social interaction where I’m having to defend my reasons or deal with an angry man (no fun) in some vain attempt to improve HIS LIFE? No one said to have a conversation…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:58 PM
-1

If men care about the future of boys in their society, why can't they take the hit and become teachers even if it means gasp being paid as much as a woman? Because unlike women, men can’t subsidize their terrible career choices with a higher earning mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:40 PM
-1

The average teacher makes $80,000 a year, despite getting extremely generous benefits and only working 10 months. Meanwhile, high school classes graduate functionally illiterate, and women regularly leave their teaching jobs to become babysitters (which is what they already were, just not in name). If anything, teachers should be paid less. Particularly the female teachers currently plaguing our public school system and having enough sex with underage males to make a Catholic priest blush.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:37 PM
3

Enjoy paying $500 for a carton of milk.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:34 PM
1

Personal attacks veiled as innocuous questions are the kind of passive aggression typical of someone that does not value integrity, particularly when those questions are meant to provoke while shifting the responsibility of instigation onto the insulted party. You lose the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:25 PM
2

If I treated women the way women treat men, I would be in prison. Being a member of the less privileged sex means that I don’t get to have my feelings subsidized by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:23 PM
2

“If I darkly hint that you’re a rapist, then my passive aggressive language allows me to personally attack you, break the rules of the subreddit with impunity, and shift the blame to you when you justifiably defend yourself after I’m the one who chose to start shit.” I know what you are. Let the world see it laid bare.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:21 PM
2

And fortunately, not all women are misandrists like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:17 PM
-5

And there we have it. The confession. Women value their comfort over integrity. This is why men will never respect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:16 PM
0

Her point was terrible, and I shut down her attempts to excuse women’s lack of integrity with the kind of direct, no-nonsense language of someone that does value integrity. Nothing was missed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:16 PM
2

Yes, and your laughter is an insult to the friendships I formed with men in the military, as well as the emotional vulnerability we shared. I feel sorry for any man that chooses to be vulnerable with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:08 PM
1

Integrity carries with it risks for everyone. If women value their own comfort over integrity, then it is valid to criticize them for it. Women are not similarly cautious in other aspects. They drive while applying makeup, texting, and not using turn signals. They cause more accidents per capita than men. But they are indoctrinated to be uniquely risk avoidant and cowardly in male-female interactions for reasons having to do more with social conditioning and less with reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:07 PM
0

Nuclear reactor meltdowns are very rare. But when they happen, they are very very veeerrry bad. Not really. TMI’s fuel melted, and it resulted in 0 deaths. Chernobyl caused 3 unavoidable deaths. Nothing you said is relevant to the point that women will lie because they value their own comfort over integrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:03 PM
0

The subject was women lying to make the rejection less uncomfortable for them, not the rare occasion when they’re refreshingly direct. If you can’t win the argument without erecting a straw man, then simply drop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:53 PM
2

Your inferences and half-veiled accusations aren’t my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:51 PM
2

And men aren’t going to stay “friends” with a woman that doesn’t meet their emotional investment halfway. Women don’t understand this, because they’re passive in nature and put the onus on men to maintain a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:50 PM
1

If women will not stop lying (and the women in this thread admit that they never will value integrity as a principle), then men are not obligated to value their input on how men behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:45 PM
2

Men aren’t fulfilled by shallow acquaintanceships like women are. They don’t care about your favorite flavor of ice cream or your hobbies. They want to be understood, not humored with vacuous small talk and low stakes group activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:44 PM
0

You don’t need to voice this as though I’m personally affected by your decision to be dishonest as a result of cowardice. You merely need to accept the reality of what you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:43 PM

Because it’s not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:37 PM
-4

You can just admit that you don’t want to be honest because it makes things awkward, and you value social cohesion over discomfort. Especially since women usually reject men they’re already familiar with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:36 PM
4

You hand picked one category to avoid admitting an uncomfortable truth about what arouses women. You are not arguing in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:32 PM
2

Yes, people usually resent being personally attacked. Women included. I said nothing about consent. Don’t darkly hint at things I never said or implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:23 PM
2

You’re describing the consequences of a low trust society. And 1% is greatly exaggerating the actual likelihood of a violent outcome. But anyway, the way to fix a low trust society is by being more honest with one another, not less. If women prioritize their own feelings over integrity, then they deserve to be called out for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:22 PM
1

If you didn’t care about hurting him when you rejected him, then you weren’t much of a friend, either. See why that’s a ridiculous argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:16 PM
2

Because men care when women don’t like unattractive things like sexism, misogyny and selfishness None of these things stop men having sex with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:14 PM
2

Because men don’t generally want 100 friends. They want a small, close-knit group of a handful of men, at most. And female friends are particularly low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:12 PM
3

Something tells me if a three hundred pound gay guy covered with prison tattoos cornered you in a dark alley and asked you for a kiss, you wouldn’t assume he would prefer the second response. How many interactions of this nature do you think women experience daily? For that matter, why are women hanging out in dark alleys? Both answers are pretty accurate in conveying “no thanks”. That’s all the information the recipient needs or is entitled to. Which has nothing to do with the fact that you ask…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:11 PM
-5

“I can’t be honest with people because there’s a vanishingly slim chance they’ll hurt me.” So women are cowards?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:08 PM
-6

Your odds of being strangled by a man against your will are extremely low. You are much more likely to be hurt in your car on the way to meeting said man. And you likely drive while texting, not using turn signals, and checking your appearance in the mirror, which, unlike being honest, are risky behaviors that you can easily avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:06 PM

No, for three reasons: I don’t cultivate my appearance for women’s benefit. I interact with women as little as possible. If I wanted feedback on my appearance, a woman’s would be much less valuable than a man’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:04 PM
8

I understand math, and you used an irrelevant, imaginary example to obfuscate the truth being discussed: That rape porn is a very popular category with women, and doesn’t even scratch the top 20 in categories of porn men consume. This is an observable fact, and the fact of relevance being discussed. You’re deflecting to a discussion about gross numbers to obfuscate things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:02 PM
15

I know this because I’m not a rube who bought into a lie that rape is about “power” and not lust. A lie so pervasive and insidious that most people accept it as fact, including my father, who taught it to me. Chemical castration is highly effective at reducing recidivism in sex offenders: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3565125/#:~:text=Chemical%20castration%20using%20LHRH%20agonists,to%20sexual%20offending%20(10) Furthermore, we can dismiss this ridiculous claim with a simple thought e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:54 PM
1

spider-man-pointing-meme.jpg A simple understanding of how sex works makes your claim fatuous, but considering the subject matter, I know that you’re incapable of arguing about it objectively. You may have the last word.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:50 PM
5

Women occasionally treat men badly, and plenty of women back burn men precisely the way as described in the worst case friend zone scenario. The onus is on the man to distance himself from the woman, but that does not make the woman’s behavior blameless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:41 PM
2

The friend zone doesn’t exist. The friend zone absolutely exists, when used to describe the very real phenomenon of people developing attraction for a friend that does not reciprocate. The only reason this is controversial is because women have a tendency to “back burn” men and resent being called out on it. Also, women simultaneously claim to be mind readers that can reject men based on latent, buried misogyny, then simultaneously claim “unwelcome surprise” when their male friend confesses. Mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:38 PM
4

So you concede that you were making shit up. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:30 PM
1

Women obviously don’t want to actually be raped, because it would be incredibly painful to get fucked in a dry unprepared pussy. It’s painful for both men and women. Most women are wet when they’re raped. Hence, shameful arousal. Women engage in FANTASY for the same reason anyone else does - it helps them orgasm. A thought-terminating attempt to shut down the conversation with just-so claims isn’t compelling. If a majority of women get off on the fantasy of being raped (a distinctly feminine phe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:29 PM
3

I don’t even know what “grifters” you’re talking about. If you have a specific point, make it. I’m not compelled by vague hand gestures at imaginary people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:22 PM
1

Distinction without a difference. A rape fantasy fetishizes male-on-female violence, and most women possess it. You’re clutching at straws to avoid conceding.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:19 PM
10

When guys play violent video games does that mean they wish they were being killed in real life? Men aren’t trying to die. Death in these games is a failure state they aim to avoid. When you watch a scary movie, does that mean you want your child to be possessed by demons? Consuming fictional stories is not the same thing as being aroused by them. Humans engage with the things that scare us as forms of entertainment. This is gender neutral. Men don’t masturbate to things that “scare” them. That’…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:15 PM
22

A lot of women use violent sex and fantasies as a way of reclaiming their own bodies, or control. It has nothing to do with “control.” A woman flicking her bean to porn of a man raping a woman isn’t exercising control over anything except her wrist. She’s shamefully aroused and hamstering up a narrative that doesn’t cause her too much cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:12 PM
15

Distinction without a difference. If the most vile, rape-fetishizing porn is being consumed mostly by women, then it is fair to say that it’s mostly women getting off on violent, misogynistic porn. We don’t need to bend ourselves in mental pretzels going “not all women” when what matters in these discussions is the primary audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:10 PM
2

Thanks for quoting Google at me, but you didn’t refute anything I said. If a fatherless man recognizes that being fatherless was ruinous for his social and moral development, he is not wrong to criticize fatherless behavior in others. It’s only hypocritical if he were to tell fatherless men to do things he doesn’t himself do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:08 PM
7

That’s a naive outlook. What most blue pill men actually believe is something between “red pill men exaggerate women’s promiscuity” and “red pill men are hypocrites for judging others for sexual behaviors similar to the ones they practice.” It’s not a principled stance, and neither opinion is valid. Blue pilled men would lose their minds if women had to walk around with their body counts above their heads. And when men become sluts, it’s usually because their preferred alternative of hot, headbo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:04 PM
13

Old women aren’t expendable. Grandmothers are highly valued in intelligent herd species. Elephant grandmothers help their daughters, for example. Men are more expendable than any woman that isn’t a potato.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:00 PM
5

We’ll stop using that term when women don’t start blanket insulting men with snide jabs about “mommy issues.” There is no value in being the “bigger man” in a fight when the enemy will just keep nut tapping you and the referee does nothing to stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 12:59 PM
3

That’s not how hypocrisy works. Someone telling you that alcohol is bad for you after they gave themselves liver cirrhosis isn’t a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 12:57 PM
5

These people have no principles. It’s all who, whom. Being a piece of shit is fine if you’re properly vetted as a member of The Right Side of History. Concede nothing, lest those awful right wingers seem like they may have a point.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/25 01:47 PM
14

Filtering words out from the common parlance is a common tactic used by propagandists. The average man can’t fight a concept that he can’t even put a word to. There’s a reason every adult has heard the word “misogyny” while “misandry” is one of the least propagated words in existence for a very evident current problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/25 12:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter