TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PornoWizard Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by PornoWizard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, you are correct. An oversight on my part.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:09 AM
2

we all know the boy must have consented He can't consent as a minor. In these situations the kids always "consent". Consent is not an issue as he CANNOT give consent. There is no concern for what the kids want in ANY of these cases as it does not matter; they are kids. put blame on the boy Do you have any examples where this has happened in a similar context? I've never seen or heard of this happening in these cases.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:08 PM
3

Agreed. There is too much of an "Us vs. Them" mentality around here. A female doing something bad to a man is not an issue. It becomes an issue only if she does it because of his gender, nothing else.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:04 PM
2

Not in the slightest.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:31 AM
6

I don't find porn misogynistic. Do you? If so, why? Porn comes in all varieties. I would love to hear how hot man on man action misogynistic.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:31 AM
26

Christ, these statistics, or ones that are similar, come up about once a month. Not only is a repost, but the statistics do not SAY anything about one gender or the other. Statistics need proper context and oversight to become useful, otherwise they are just numbers. Look at the other posts that deal with similar statistics to see examples of both. And: "LOL, FEMALES"? I don't care where you found this or if you made this yourself. We don't need misogynistic bullshit like that.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 09:10 PM
-5

It's just an ad hominem. It's a crappy post no matter how relevant the core topic is.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:21 AM
6

Even if the topic is relevant it's still just an ad hominem that does not contribute anything meaningful.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:20 AM
29

This post is in no way conducive to this sub reddit and is in fact detrimental to anything it might try to accomplish.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:50 AM
15

The two pictures are separate and one was created after the fact in response to the other.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:43 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights. A man being a victim of something, even if his kids are involved, even if he is innocent or anything else not involving a clear gender issue, does not belong here.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:05 AM
49

What's with the "LOL FEMALES"? That does nothing but undermine your point, regardless of it's content, by acting in a manner that can easily come off as misogynistic. Also, that picture really has nothing to do with feminists, now does it? It makes no mention of any claims made by them but just keeps throwing around the term "women". The whole thing is more of an attempt at an attack with data against women in general than a counterpoint to feminist claims. This data could be correct, I am not e…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:58 AM
13

Calories do not necessarily correlate to weight. Simplest example is me eating a bunch of rocks. A more realistic example involves water retention.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 11:51 PM
1

Dis shit dumb. That's all.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:28 PM
1

Fuck you, you hateful cunt. Love it. Really, I do. Emotion, pure emotion. I love how it works. Nothing else, I have done the same. What you are saying is if she 'meant well', then her rank sexism is excusable, and moreover, that he should 'understand'. I never said he should "understand" I only said it is understandable, as in it is possible to see a rationale behind the sexism. Sexism occurs all the time and some times it is warranted. Do I think it was warranted here? No, not really. I suppose…
/r/MensRights15/06/11 07:14 AM
1

I couldn't possibly disagree more. What would be the point of turtling? He would have a slam-dunk discrimination case against the school, hospital, etc. And they know it. Because it may come off as uncouth, it is much simpler to simply present the issue then introduce something that may be seen as bias into it. The bias is there, it does not mean you go around screaming about it. Use tact. Picture it this way to help you see your bias: "In our society a nurse is traditionally white, that is chan…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:31 AM
3

From my point of view, the worst thing that this person did was deny you some education. Were I a mother in labor I would much prefer assistance someone who has been through this procedure before as opposed to not. You are a health care provider, people's lives depend on you. By denying you some form of education or experience that person would have negatively impacted, to some degree, your ability to not only perform your job but to provide adequate care. Your inexperience could have both led t…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 09:14 PM
1

Makes sense, although I know that even people with stupid names might not change them because they have grown up with the name. Still, if the list is comprehensive enough I imagine this is not as terrible an idea as it sounds.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:24 PM
1

Even if those chemicals are in semen that means nothing about their effect on a woman when present in the vaginal canal in the form of semen. How much of each chemical is needed to have an effect? And how much is present in semen? How much is absorbed by any woman during intercourse? How much time is required? How much semen is required? How do other forms of birth control affect this? And are other forms of birth control taken into account? I can take data and make it appear that women who do n…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 09:27 PM
2

What on earth are you talking about, how was this taken personally by nanomagnetic? And he was providing context, not downplaying anything. If there is data that shows the contrary then by all means let's use it. The contrarian view point is on the foundations of the scientific method.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 08:37 AM
7

Wow, whole lot of possible mistakes there. This is purely correlation. The causes of which are not necessarily the ones given in this article. I can see people who are abstinent being less happy than others as they have less intimacy in their lives, and those that use condoms being less happy and less intimate those those not using condoms. I see not using condoms in a relationship as a set up in intimacy and trust in a relationship. No relationship status was given, but I can imagine this being…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 08:34 AM
1

Keep in mind, on campus crimes mean just that and nothing more. It does not need to involve students.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 03:36 AM
1

killed himself in protest Either the article is stupid, the title is stupid or that man was stupid. But I do know that this does not belong in this sub reddit.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:07 AM
13

In our society it is common that the mother takes the role of primary care giver. It is not surprising that the number of deaths attributed to neglect or abuse would be higher in one gender over the other if there is a significant difference in the number of people in said role. According to this article: http://moneynews.com/InvestingAnalysis/US-Census-Working-Moms/2010/01/15/id/346519 It seems as though there are 150k stay-at-home fathers out of a total of 5.3m stay-at-home parents. That is a …
/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter