TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PoundnColons Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by PoundnColons on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Now you're just throwing a tantrum. You along with these professionals are promoting bad science. Many professionals have promoted bad science in many practices throughout history as well as recent times. That's why correct research is required especially in a case like this. You clearly don't understand how this sort of thing should go before starting to change childhood development.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:49 PM
0

that don't yet exist) when this boy would be a case study Bc who doesn't want to run experiments on children without properly studying the situation first? Let's just let a few professionals use single cases and anecdotal evidence as enough to move forward rather than running proper case studies on large groups of developing children with gender dysphoria! That's what you're promoting. Bad science. My opinion changes all the time based on new information and scientific collective agreement. When…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:04 PM
1

You're trusting some, not a collective. Where are the studies these doctors use to base their opinion that delaying puberty doesn't cause any long term effects? Where are the studies showing that gender identity solidifies in a prepubescent brain? Individuals professionals, and many at that, have made all kinds of stupid decisions throughout history based off what they think based on their limited knowledge. That's what we're seeing right now. We won't have actual answer for decades after this h…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:25 AM
1

Do you not understand what a source is? You just claimed "that's not how it works" therefore you must have a source of collective research and findings from doctors, psychologists, and surgeons, that granted you this knowledge no? Seeing as we collectively know so little about it I very much doubt you know "that's not how it works"; if it truly doesn't then great but I need the scientific community backing that claim not a random person on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:40 PM
1

You'll have to provide sources that can prove how it works then and that development and puberty do not continue to affect this. Because that's the crux of the matter here.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:48 PM
13

Don't believe that's possible. Different mechanism cause its' tissue development.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:07 PM
3

I'm not saying gender identity is a decision mind you, transitioning is the decision I'm talking about. Oh look, right there I already addressed that..... I'm aware of everything you've stated. That's also why I think it's important to let development fully occur, the brain may naturally correct through development. This is what I've been expressing throughout this thread. I'm more than aware gender identity isn't a choice which is more reason to let natural development finish before saying some…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:05 PM
2

I'm generally very supportive of trans issues. This is something I would hope we could all agree is an issue that should be discussed at great lengths before we as a society decide its ok the start transitioning a prepubescent child's gender due to their currently undeveloped brain's gender identity. This isn't just a trans issue but a child's right issue as well, should we protect children from their parent's decisions when it may be detrimental to them? When it infringes on their right to sove…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:48 PM
1

Yes and it would then make sense that their body's natural male development may "correct" this. It also may not. If not they can then be fully equipped with the required knowledge as an adult to make their own decisions.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:32 PM
4

I'm aware of the general age designation. My point is that disrupting natural development is likely not the correct choice. We don't fully understand development especially when it comes to gender identity. Prepubescent gender identity may not be something we should be making decisions on especially since so much more physical and mental development occurs after puberty. Why would we interrupt their natural course of development just because of their undeveloped prepubescent brains idea of gende…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:30 PM
33

Hormones are very powerful even later in life past our natural developmental phase. The introduction of more hormones will spike development according to those hormones. If it didn't anabolic steroid and HGH usage wouldn't work to develop unnatural amounts of muscle.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:54 PM
22

No, we actually don't know enough. The human brain is still developing. We don't know enough about brain development let alone gender identity in the brain to say a young child's gender identity will be maintained through adulthood once the brain has fully developed. Best way to on the moral safe side is to let them behave how they please but don't take procedures to alter them because it messes with natural development. If their idea of gender identity is naturally occurring and not caused by o…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:50 PM
32

I understand it's "too late", however the child's brain is not fully developed. Therefore it's safe to think their gender identity is not fully developed. Which means making life changing decisions like this could be very inaccurate. We have to think of these things pragmatically not on emotion. While it's "too late" plenty of adults transition. Let them behave and dress as they please while young and transition later in life. We simply have no idea if the child's brain is developed enough to ma…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:42 PM
21

You want to permit adults to sexually assault middle schoolers? k
/r/MensRights30/06/16 08:00 PM
7

Not to mention Mark Hamill lost weight to reprise Luke as well. Who the fuck in acting complains about this shit? You went into a business centered around appearance. This ridiculous quote from Carrie They might as well say get younger, because that’s how easy it is. Yes losing weight is just as hard as becoming younger....
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:47 PM
1

It was sent out by his company's HR department...... What about that is appropriate in anyway?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 12:30 AM
-4

What's your point?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:26 PM
1

You claim the possibility of something without creating a valid form of argument or providing evidence to back up the initial idea of your hypothesis. Everything requires evidence, or at least some valid logical structure with arguments.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:42 PM
3

You've provided no evidence for your claims.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:06 PM
0

This is a raid. This shit needs to stop. Anytime non-usuals enter into another forum for a reason such as this it Is a raid. You are raiding their community. Their community interaction will be skewed and the downvotes and upvotes will not represent the community. You are promoting SRS type action, MRA will go in disrupt the conversation and whether you like it or not mass downvote what they don't like. This is simply the fact of the matter. We are not SRS stop linking to others threads.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:16 AM
8

Why are so many people coming here and acting like the posts on this subreddit are about "'x' is happen because of women"?! The post is simply about male suicide, no one is saying "women cause male suicide rates to skyrocket". Please take your lack of cognitive ability elsewhere.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:03 AM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? I haven't even remotely suggested that she represents all women nor have I suggested that women are pushing men into war. Hillary Clinton's words represent a mentality, a horrible and flawed mentality. That is what is being discussed here.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:17 AM
4

You don't understand the difference between privilege and physiological differences.... It's not nitpicking, there is a clear difference. Privilege is created via social structure not physical abilities. They are two completely different concepts of advantage. No she didn't mean living with the death of loved ones is as hard as dying. She specifically calls women the victims. Mothers losing sons and daughters losing fathers, because we all know the fathers who lost sons and the sons who lost fat…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:48 PM
6

You mistake the word privilege with biological differences. The point of this whole thread is that feminist cry out about male privilege while it is men who are sent to die and kill in war yet somehow people like Hillary Clinton still manage to claim that women are the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:35 PM
1

We have two very close relatives: The Chimpanzee and the Bonobo. Humans split from the common ancestor ~ 6.5 millions years ago and chimpanzees and bonobos split ~ 1.5 millions years ago. The Bonobos did not travel as much as chimpanzees, stayed in the trees and have a more matriarchal social construct. The Bonobo did not go through as many evolutionary changes as chimpanzees or humans. Which also means bonobos may give better insight as to what the Homo-Pan ancestor was like. The chimpanzees ha…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:00 AM
2

First you make the dumbest mistake: "I haven't experienced it therefore it does not exist" That is the logic you built your entire argument on. Then: Victim blaming. You have just claimed that every man who has ever been convicted via false rape accusations to be a misogynist creep and therefore he deserved it. That's just the start of who your flawed logic blames for the wrong that has been done to them. You then go on to use more personal experiences which are utterly meaningless when discussi…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:04 PM
2

I think the point here is still why get married? If you aren't like this crazy woman why not cohabitation? Marriage is a risk for men.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:03 PM
3

Major props to this kid. He has some major backbone especially showing up to school in a skirt since he was probably mocked and harassed by his schoolmates for it. Young boys recognizing discrimination against males is a good step forward.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:53 PM
2

You're arguing two wrongs make a right. Returning sexism for sexism is hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:47 PM
20

Always on a power trip. Always wrong. Why the hell would you marry someone like that?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 02:56 AM
2

People will always be displeased with those in power. I think you might be being judgmental although I haven't been around very long and wouldn't know anything about his actions around here.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 02:37 AM
7

A comparative researched and sourced article??? How dare you! You're just victim blaming! Women are gentle flowers that could never commit violence! Also this should be added to the side of the front page. Great read, extremely well written minus a "then" where a "than" should be but I'll let it slide this time :p
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:09 PM
7

This isn't an argument over the fact that women get away with lying while men don't. This Is about a woman getting off when she is clearly insane or a lying murderer. She gets off because she claims he beat her, even though there is no evidence to prove this. The issue here is someone not being punished for their actions because society believes their lies without evidence because it's a woman. Not that men can't do the same. You're misdirecting the issue.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:21 PM
2

At the moment I can not watch this video(on my phone with friends) but I will add my view point on the intrinsic nature of humans for now. I don't believe humans are evil or good by nature. Humans are animals and instinctual. I don't think you can claim evolved instincts are good or evil. Good and evil are ideas produced by our conscious. It's often subjective since morality can be programed via environment. Its one of the reasons I lean towards libertarian views. I don't know whats completely r…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:36 AM
27

It's important to realize that it's not just a lot of women who are vermin. All people are equally corruptible and evil and that's what we need feminists to start realizing.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:49 PM
3

Actually it is a far fetched leap in logic. Because it's not logical it's an emotional response. It has nothing to do with logic or reasoning because any proper thought process is completely shattered when emotions grab hold and when you don't have the ability to separate reason and emotion you get these situations.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:34 PM
1

I can definitely see where you are coming from. I don't particular agree with you nor the comedy but I do see your point and would say you are right in many regards.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:10 AM
5

Nothing about this article is serious. At one point it suggests setting someone on fire because they gave you unwanted advice in the gym. It's cracked.com so much on that website is just pure comedy.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 09:54 AM
1

Knew who it was before clicking the link. Love Jim Jeffries! He is so under appreciated in the states.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:56 PM
1

Oh, well then I have been horribly mistaken. Thank you for the correction.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 08:10 PM
-4

Those aren't quotation marks. 'rapist' vs. "rapist".
/r/MensRights06/01/12 01:10 AM
2

I'll look that one up. During college my room mate always watched the show but I haven't seen this one. I actually really liked the one about the lesbians being in an abusive relationship. It had a lot of deep gender topics. It's a good show all in all.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 10:03 PM
12

I dislike the radfems that drive the ideological movement but I also dislike these kind of comments. They are rather tasteless insults that do no good. Just my thoughts on it.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:54 PM
2

I realize you're being sarcastic but a comment to people who actually say or think those things in seriousness: We are an Internet forum. This is a place to spread information about Men's rights issues and a lot include the misandric beliefs at the core of the feminist movement. So these things need to be talked about and not everything here is going to be high priority things being an Internet forum and all. /mini rant.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:52 PM
5

Richard Dawkins is a brilliant evolutionary biologist who has written quite a few books, so what the fuck is this Watson lady standing on besides a bigoted soapbox?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:14 PM
5

"Every girl is capable of murder, if you hurt her. Watch out you don't push me any further." Just perpetuating the idea that women aren't responsible for their violent actions. It must have been the guys fault.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 03:22 AM
6

She doesn't want true political, social and economic equality because she doesn't want the equality to exist where it should, in opportunity. She wants the equality to exist in the out come only. In many cases for this to happen the game has to be rigged and cause other inequalities. Giving women things easy in order to produce an equal outcome is not equality.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 03:07 AM
1

mgtow? Also I'm pretty sure sexuality is hard wired. It's not something you can just change.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 05:25 PM
16

She could have ripped off all his clothes and started blowing him and none of the females would have thought it inappropriate.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 05:05 AM
2

Racism is not the systemic oppression of a different race. Reverse racism is a bullshit word. Racism is racism. It's hate or belief that someone is lesser because of their race.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 10:25 PM
3

He never said they don't have the right to. He is implying that you have a poor choice in friends if this guy that has bought into the women's study bull shit is your friend.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 10:23 PM
2

Right so have an abortion if you don't want the baby or give it up for adoption. You have two options after becoming pregnant where as the man has no options and must live with your choice which could make him a father having to pay child support. Even if he wore a condom.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:20 PM
1

Just wait till SOPA.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:36 AM
-3

So brave
/r/MensRights10/12/11 05:14 AM
-1

I was considering posting something similar....but I think I can see the degree of denial we've hit around here from the downvotes you've received.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 04:23 AM
10

I agree with Oy_vey_Sarah. This woman has a delusional sense of entitlement but how is she a skank? Why are we name calling?
/r/MensRights10/12/11 04:16 AM
1

Luckily I saw it with [+20] so I automatically assumed it was sarcastic. Saved me a lot of head ache.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 11:01 PM
1

Ok I understand now. Many thanks.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:44 PM
2

Sorry I'm trying to figure out how this is relevant to my comment, could you clarify?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 08:48 PM
1

This isn't an english paper. In order to get a point across and to hopefully make it stick; You tell people what you're about to tell them, you tell them in detail, and then you tell them what you just told them.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:13 AM
1

Man stabbed 200 times by wife? Must have been an asshole!
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:09 AM
3

Rape Victim's Parents Need to Accept Her Role in Her Assault.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:01 AM
1

Would you ever consider making a throw away account and doing an AMA? I know it's probably tough to discuss but I would be interested in it and the more exposure for these types of incidents the better. I understand of course you not wanting to though.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:55 AM
7

Don't get me started on crowds of women blocking door ways! I have to push my way through even going as far to say "excuse me" in a polite tone. They just stand there chatting away and barely make room as I push my way through. It's ridiculous. Same thing with hallways, they always just stop and take up as much space as humanly possible, I don't get it. Also as far as the sidewalk thing goes, people need to understand it's the same rules as a road, stay on your right for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:53 AM
3

The science seems fairly interesting. The article is horrible but the science can help tell us a lot about our selves. However I noticed they aren't examining female's egg genetic structure in the same way. Perhaps we are getting the same RNA changes for both overweight sexes?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:34 AM
1

That was the point of the post that you originally responded to..... Those things have been there for a long time and he was saying how shocking it is that justice made it through without getting trampled by such things.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:22 AM
1

Take is medical license! It's obvious he doesn't need to be practicing anymore.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 10:28 AM
1

Great story from my counselor, i struggle with depression so don't worry I don't see a counselor because im crazy: His boss once asked him if he would see a child molester, he refused at first but his boss said "no, I'm not asking if you will, im asking you to go do it." So he goes in with the preconceived notion of hating this man for what he did and thinking of him as a monster. The man was 26, I believe, and there with his girlfriend who was doing most of the talking. After a while the girlfr…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 10:06 AM
2

Sounds like someone is trying to put words into this poor child's mouth. Children are easily manipulated when they don't fully understand a situation like this.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 09:43 AM
2

I can't even begin to wrap my mind around the pian and mental anguish he is experiencing from this. I'm surprised he hasn't tried to kill himself again, I know I would.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 09:35 AM
1

Can someone fill me in? There are a lot of deleted posts in the OP's link. I did visit the SRS post about it but that's just usual bullshit they spew, so as someone looking at pieces of the aftermath what exactly happened.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 06:05 PM
2

/r/Shitredditsays Approach with caution. They find posts on reddit they, being self righteous glorious angels of all that is right and true, and then circle jerk to how horrible it is. Most of the posts are ones they label misogynistic and most of their comments are idiotic slurs against men because most of them view men as having an opinion as ridiculous. They absolutely despise /r/Mensrights and make fun of it whenever they can. Don't bother posting with rational arguments it is a self proclai…
/r/MensRights02/12/11 04:47 PM
3

Post it to SRS = instant shit storm.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 08:55 AM
38

OP should reply with this, just the gender roles reversed, and post the replies.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 12:32 AM
12

That's how an understanding human being thinks. I don't think there are many of those in the system.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:23 PM
1

I don't hold resentment towards my parents for it. I know people that do. I know that my parents are blinded by their religious idiocies, however if their excuse was like your excuse I would probably never forgive them. And yes they are good people, to an extent just like many. That doesn't change what they did. This isn't a small issue, I used to think it was until I really looked into it and watched the procedure. This is a serious issue and one that literally changes your child's life.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:21 AM
1

Please read the article. It is not simply one instance.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:16 AM
5

How about the point that what she did was clearly unacceptable?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:13 AM
1

So what you're saying is any negative emotion = hate. You greatly misunderstand the meaning of the word hate.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:43 AM
2

Holding resentment something they did is different than hating the person, if you can't understand that then I can see this entire conversation was pointless.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 05:12 AM
2

I don't get how you possibly think it's no big deal to cut off a piece of someone's body. Your parents committing an immoral crime against you is a very valid reason to have resentment towards them. It's an UNNECESSARY procedure. There is no legitimate reason to force it upon your child.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 01:31 AM
3

So you're going to mutilate your child's genitals simply because you prefer the look of a chopped penis? Do you not realize how demented that sounds? This is your child! His genitals are HIS! You are willing to take away his choice in the condition of a very personal part of his body? The procedure is not reversible however it can be done later in life, let him decide when he is old enough, please don't deprive him of ownership over his own body. I beg that of you in the name of the love you wil…
/r/MensRights21/11/11 08:57 PM
1

Thank you for taking your time to clarify. Very well written and has definitely made me rethink my tactics.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 05:04 PM
3

The first two question were your personal preference and did not truly matter because the subject at hand is letting people do it to infants who don't get a choice. I used that structure to make a point not actually ask you. I wanted: why you would accept such a thing just because you wanted it others whom are circumcised definitely did not want it.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 05:01 PM
8

Probably a troll but. Why would you have it done? Yours telling me you would want your foreskin cut off? Your answers don't really matter because thats personal, and you see your personal view if yours. Just because you want it done doesn't mean others do. It's a disgusting act and if you want it done to you fine but I would rather it not have happened to me and I had no say.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 08:05 AM
8

I understand your sentiment but you don't want a law telling people they can't mutilate babies?
/r/MensRights21/11/11 08:01 AM
6

You mean the part of a males penis that protects the glans is a disadvantage? I think eyelids are an evolutionary disadvantage because things like eyelashes are always getting stuck behind them and scratching my eye, we should start removing infants eyelids!
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:54 AM
7

Is slavery wrong? By whose standards? Because at one point most everyone thought it was fine. Just because people think it's ok to slice off part of a male infant's penis doesn't make it ok.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:50 AM
2

No one ever claimed parents shouldn't tell their Kids not to do things others don't like. Two children are playing and playing doctor which is in itself something they don't understand. This isn't sexual assault as you claim that's the issue this is a child doing something he thought a doctor was supposed to do because he was a doctor. You don't seem to understand the horrible severity of the situation with the parents pressing charges like this.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:20 AM
1

A 6 year old can not grasp understanding of the situation! It's like charging a mentally handicapped person with sexual assault for slapping a girls ass because he saw it in a movie, he doesn't understand!
/r/MensRights19/11/11 07:48 AM
1

Trust me it's not the "sexual assault clearly isn't harmless" part you said. It's your idiotic spew about this situation that's getting you downvotes. You're an idiot. This is a 6 year old child.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 07:45 AM
6

Where are you getting all this? Why are you interjecting things no one has said or even hinted at and acting like that's our message?
/r/MensRights17/11/11 01:15 AM
3

This post was not pointing out a societal double standard but an institutionalized double standard. However incorrectly and with out back up, he is comparing this case to a hypothetical situation, one with swapped gender roles. I simply request that any such assumptions be compared to real situations eg. Produce a similar case in the same state with a man as the offender and prove that system is biased(I know it is but we still need solid evidence).
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:11 AM
1

You miss the point I was making. I'm talking about the way society treats men's and women's sexuality in this situation. And I should have said statutory rape. The way society views it is if a boy is a victim of statutory rape it's not a big deal he enjoyed it he can brush it off because he is male. if the gender role is reversed it's treated as if the girl was horribly emotionally damaged, even if she was underage and consented, as opposed to the male version. Society treats male sexuality as i…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:05 AM
-4

Please do not make such assumptions unless you have provided another similar situation for us to compare. I don't know what would happen if you switched the genders. I know the public would view it different but that doesn't mean much since it's automatically assumed that boys enjoy and benefit from anything sexual(including statutoryedited rape) while girls hate and are hurt by anything sexual. EDIT: To clarify I'm simply asking that posts aren't made making assumptions about what would happen …
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:21 PM
-1

The way you have been wording your replies seems very combative. Sorry if I took it the wrong way.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:17 PM
2

You don't understand what true solidarity is then. If this was truly gender based solidarity no woman could stand in solidarity with /r/mensrights. Gender is something men here have in common, the solidarity however comes from bringing awareness about equality issues feminism and other social norms have created against men.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:14 PM
-1

No one has grounds to sue but stop being an ass about it when trying to explain it to someone. This is at best an HR issue in which the party sending the e-mail simply needs to be told not to send out such private e-mails to everyone in the office. It is a private party and only those invited should be getting e-mails pertaining to it, especially since it is a gender specific event. If this is an in office event it makes it even more inappropriate.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:08 PM
4

I thought the issue was sending out an e-mail through business addressees about your personal girls only night....to everyone....telling all the boys to stay away. It's one thing to ask a bunch of female co-workers to a secret Santa gathering it's another to send an e-mail out informing all the boys, whom haven't been invited in the first place, that they are not invited.....It's more incredibly retarded than sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:02 PM
5

So you're going to send out an e-mail to everyone in your office explaining to people in your office who aren't white not to be offended because it's not personal, the white people just need a night to be away from all you colored folk?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:55 PM
3

/r/mensrights is not Gender based solidarity.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:50 PM
1

I'm not denying the existence of jersey shore assholes. That doesn't mean they deserve what this app is doing nor will this app only be used for such men. The women I know give out fake numbers to all sorts of "creeps" not just the ass hole depicted there. Some of these guys are just shy or don't know what they are doing and may come off creepy, or they are simply not as attractive as the girl would like and are labeled creeps. These people will end up becoming victims of this app as well.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:29 PM
0

Calm my beard? I don't know how to explain something to someone who does not understand the answer. It seems more like you have your own view and are unwilling to look at it any other way. This Is clearly an attack against men. It is an app for women so that they may publicly mock and trick men who have asked for their number simply because they want to and don't know how to act like an adult. This is a mens rights issue because it is something that can be very dangerous or harmful to men. It is…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:24 PM
8

It's quite clearly a social equality issue as well as a straight attack against men for doing what is considered natural and going after women, the social norm. Not to mention a disgusting disregard for privacy and common decency.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:46 AM
2

This might fall under specific states wire taping laws. That's just a thought.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:41 AM
7

This is disturbing no matter which gender is doing it to the other. You grow up and you reject the man like a grown ass woman.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:08 AM
2

Because violence against men has become a social norm when a woman's SO does something she doesn't like. If a man got mad at his wife for cheating on him then proceeded to take a knife to her breasts there would be public outcry at his horrible and misogynistic crime.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:49 PM
1

If you watched the movie crazy stupid love it says a lot about this double standard being true. The main characters wife cheats on him and then asks for a divorce and gets the house. The movies premise is that she cheated on him because he lost sight of himself as a man such as not dressing as nice. The movie paints it out as his fault for everything, he is in the wrong, it is his job to win her back and he apologizes. Never in the movie does she apologize for cheating on him it's irrelevant bec…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:44 PM
4

After many years of not being taken seriously I imagine an extremist group will make us take them seriously.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:12 AM
1

I'm now in love with you.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:47 PM
1

Sigh* I'll notify /b/.......
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:46 PM
1

And why is that? Can you produce a non-pathos argument?
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:30 PM
-9

I'm not entirely sure what the point of this article here is. We all already knew that lady was crazy, the sad fact is that there are plenty of other equally crazy women.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 03:04 PM
2

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:26 PM
0

If I recall under California law once she says yes the ring is hers. But I read that in one of those stupid articles that bothers writing about this type of crap so who knows if that's true. I just figured the ring worked the same as a gifted item but I could be wrong. True that's it's a social norm to give the ring back, but there is nothing normal about the whole thing.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:50 PM
2

Absolutely ok.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:44 PM
11

Money isn't an object to either party involved. She isn't a gold digger. The ring is legally hers as a gifted item. This is all just bull shit celebrity gossip. Sorry to go against the grain on this one but this is just stupid.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:46 AM
7

You go r/Feminism for putting that crazy woman in her place! Reading those posts made my day.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:38 AM
3

Great video I will be sharing.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:12 AM
22

Their pitying reactions seemed to indicate a broader cultural bias against boys: a failure, in our increasingly feminised world, to appreciate the masculine qualities of vigour, risk-taking and smashing things with sticks. My hat off to her and this is probably the reason she felt guilty about being happy it was a girl instead of a boy. But she shouldn't feel guilty it's perfectly normal for a parent to wish to preferably have a male or female child.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:54 AM
7

Completely agree. This is a non-issue. We should be concerned over institutionalized discrimination not someone preferring to hire a female, that's their business.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:47 AM
5

Thank you, was probably a troll from SRS.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:45 AM
8

Circumsized man here (as an infant) Right there is a reason on its own to ban it. Women often tell me they prefer my circumcised penis to uncircumcised ones In no way justifies slicing off part of an infants genitals. Many people also associate what you've said with a social thing that mainly exists in america since girls are told circumcision is the norm what they should look for, or is typically the first kind the see. Lucky this is dying with the passing generations. My circumcision has been …
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:23 AM
0

A 2001 survey revealed that 42 per cent of women would lie about using contraception in order to get pregnant in spite of their partners’ wishes. If that's in any way accurate I'm getting a vasectomy now!
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:58 PM
1

A 2001 survey revealed that 42 per cent of women would lie about using contraception in order to get pregnant in spite of their partners’ wishes. If that's in any way accurate I'm getting a vasectomy now!
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:57 PM
10

stating that Bieber is the father of her three-month-old child. A paternity test will clear this case up real quick.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:51 AM
9

Because someone, or the women themselves, have brought it out into the public now that he is running for president. Like I have stated before in this forum: Claiming sexual assault against a male public figure has become a form of political assassination.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:50 PM
3

I believe they were also dealt with during that time.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:42 PM
13

I'm glad there was a camera. He should counter sue. However I do not condone his behavior after she got angry with him. His verbal response was far out of line when speaking to anyone and only escalated the encounter. From reading the gibberish he wrote I can tell he doesn't have much going for him upstairs.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:26 PM
7

I second the book idea.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:58 PM
3

This is disgusting on both parents accounts. They should both be punished. Also /b/ has already gotten a hold of the video and are doing their thing which will probably turn out pretty badly.... 4chan link for those who can get inb4 404. EDIT: I've seen many comments such as this "Hillary Adams is a /b/-tard. This is a personal army request. She was breaking the law, and the responsible adults in the house disciplined her within legal limits. She planted the camera and knew the best way to "act"…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:25 AM
4

How does this in any way validate the double standard? Is it only acceptable for women who have trouble masturbating with their hand to own personal pleasure products? And I have heard of a few that have difficulties yes.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 10:17 PM
3

I don't see a real problem here. It is true that men completely dominate the IT field. They are just trying to get women to think about about it as a job option as it is generally a good field to go into.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:31 PM
2

I can agree with both of y'alls points. This is a fairly good sized forum so somethings others may think is a worthy issue while others wont. We just have to accept what some think is an issue since there are a lot of us. Also to add to his point police brutality affects men more so than women.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:47 PM
4

If you want to come around here and post why not make it productive and have an actual intelligent conversation? You are merely acting like a child instead.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:40 PM
1

haha thank you kindly my good man.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:23 AM
1

I cried. This breaks my heart.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:17 AM
1

But I like the look of circumcised penises betterrrr!
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:01 AM
9

I believe the issue here is 'underage pupil'. I wouldn't say charge her with anything but she should lose her job.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 05:52 AM
9

Because fuck this baby that I've decided to keep even though I could get an abortion! If they end up having the child and you can prove they knew they were pregnant and drank and smoked regardless and the child has been harmed because of it then I am all for charging her with child abuse.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 05:49 AM
9

It's relevant to gender equality issues. It is not bashing men for the issue and it is pointing out that whats been happening to women in advertising is even now happening to men. We need to focus on actual equality right?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 05:43 AM
3

So basically you just lack the ability to think critically.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:40 AM
10

I've seen one of her other lectures for a communications class, I don't remember which one though possibly the 1st or 2nd. She makes some great points about advertising and the damages it causes to both sexes, more so to women. However there were a few things she harps on that rubs me a little wrong. What's great is she doesn't point it out as men's fault(or at least I haven't heard her say so). So over all I enjoy her lectures though.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:39 AM
6

It's a form of political assassination. You want to get rid of a male public figure? Grab a low working female to claim sexual assault charges.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:24 PM
6

Just because china has equality issues in other areas in no way makes this a bad law.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:57 AM
0

He clearly meant a paying job.....
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:48 AM
1

Relevant [Long]
/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter