TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PowerWisdomCourage Archive

View 2 posts and 845 comments by PowerWisdomCourage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

All the responsibility. None of the rights.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:56 PM
3

Say what you will about online dating but it's made bypassing these types of women very easy.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:02 PM
0

You say you're depressed and if you got someone pregnant you'd probably commit suicide but are you drowning in so much pussy that's even a possibility? Not to be insulting, I'm legitimately questioning. Doesn't sound like your life is together very well and that usually means you aren't very successful with women (just generalizing). At 21, you're still very young to make a decision like that. You've barely just passed into adulthood (and some would argue aren't even there yet). Consider: you'll…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:08 PM
9

I mean, it makes sense. Think about it: Men have been getting more and more obsessed with physical perfection. Not just physique but health in general. Woman have been sold "HeAlTHy At AnY sIzE." I can't imagine the pincer movement of health isn't affecting it both ways.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:38 AM
13

No. You cannot retroactively revoke consent. Ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/21 02:48 AM
35

Forced sterilization should be the norm in cases like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 06:10 PM
5

To be fair, it wasn't tear gas (just smoke) and it was after protesters started pelting the police with rocks and bottles. Regardless, he shouldn't have been out there to begin with.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/20 10:34 PM
2

Go ahead and pay them: out of the US Women's Soccer funds. In less than a year, when there is no more US Women's Soccer, you can thank these 28 women.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 07:12 PM
61

Unless she can make money off of said person.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 02:19 PM
2

He would but the Democrats abandoned any shred of dignity they had left but there's always some moron spouting "at least they're not killing people" nonsense as if the right exist as roving bands of murderers with legal immunity because Trump is in office so they're able to justify the complete lack of anything resembling standards.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 12:37 PM
7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Is_the_Nigger_of_the_World
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 12:00 PM
1

Maximum self awareness.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 05:49 PM
21

I look forward to her 43 minutes of suspended community service she'll face when found guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/20 03:59 PM
45

Yeah, I think this is the message everyone needs. Boys get the message they must control and suppress their feelings. Girls get the message that every feeling they have is completely valid. The best answer is somewhere in between. Something like: your feelings are valid but you need to be in control of them.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:54 PM
16

"Who let you ladies out? Back to the Girls Power Zone with you. You know you shouldn't be out here."
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:50 PM
10

It's probably a complex owned by them.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:50 PM
3

Neither of these are ADA compliant.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:47 AM
4

Take a red pen and mark up the incorrect parts
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:10 PM
2

They opted not to allow The Red Pill on their streaming service. They'd never allow a documentary that didn't paint the MRM as a shadowy, dangerous movement of incel would-be rapists.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 06:41 PM
1

Last I checked it was on Amazon Prime for free.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 06:38 PM
11

Say it with me: feminism is a cult.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:37 AM
41

It's amazing what you can find when you start to look at psychology from more than 1 perspective.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:42 PM
9

Not for nothing, but that doesn't say it was staged. In fact, he talks about how he would have rejected her if she asked him first and he was immediately uncomfortable, which is consistent with everything I've read up to now. He just didn't think it was harassment. Seems like spreading the idea that it was staged is more false than anything.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:18 PM
11

The kiss wasn't forced, it was staged. Never once heard that anywhere, ever. Good to know though, if true. Although all his interviews immediately afterward stated otherwise. Do you have a reliable source for that? A cursory Duck Duck Go search didn't come up with anything.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:05 PM
11

That's also after her creepy Orlando Bloom comment and the forced kiss on the kid in that talent/singing competition show.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 11:51 AM
2

This comic doesn't illustrate what the artist intended.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:48 PM
5

No, he really didn't. It was a hypothetical about desperate starfuckers. You an do anything you want to them, and they consent to it, because you're famous and they're pathetic nobodies. Read some famous band member's biographies, it's fucking mind blowing what (mostly) women will do just to be fame adjacent for 20 minutes. I remember Marilyn Manson stripping a girl and covering her in raw meat. I think I remember Johnathan Davis talking about a woman using a litter box in front of the band, but…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:51 AM
21

Wasn't the spear just to check if he was dead (which he already was)? Longinus (who did the piercing) is even a Saint. Was he stabbed prior to that?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/19 11:38 AM
9

Resisting arrest. Even if you didn't do anything up to that point, you're now under arrest for resisting. This shit is not a request.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 05:08 PM
8

If we take the "dangerous men" BS as true, isn't this just like raping fish in a barrel? A zone where there's nothing but women? Sounds like the best place to victimize women.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 05:35 PM
2

Great! Thank you for reaching out to them.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:01 PM
6

Also, alimony should have a maximum time limit. 1, no more than 2, years and only if you meet the aforementioned requirements. It should be there to help you get established IF you sacrificed career prospects for children/family but it shouldn't be a lifestyle.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:54 PM
5

Isn't she the one that didn't care to work with white men anymore? I guess a paycheck really changed her tone.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:19 PM
5

newspeak n. Deliberately ambiguous and contradictory language used to mislead and manipulate the public.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:29 PM
42

It is a real problem there, you're absolutely right. And black and Hispanic people commit something like 2/3 of all violent crime in the US but no one but racists are suggesting we go back to segregation to protect people from them.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 03:01 PM
8

If I were to venture a guess, women have such an over-inflated sense of self-worth that, when they rate men in relation to themselves, everyone pales in comparison. Like the whole reacher/settler thing: most women seem to consider themselves the settler. Granted that's a broad generalization (pun somewhat intended) and I'm not basing it on anything but it seems plausible given the current climate.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 05:16 PM
4

I think you're confusing refugee and refuge. A refuge just means shelter.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:26 PM
3

How do you know you're in a feminist bookstore? There's no humor section.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 11:54 AM
2

But they control the media and the media wants us focused on race and sex rather than class.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:42 PM
8

Let's hope she loses custody, at least.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:43 PM
101

Good on him for doing this. Unfortunately, the focus will solely be on his skin. The silver lining to that is that someone will take the case (I'm not sure anyone would jump at the chance had he not been a minority) but unfortunate because it ignores his sex being a contributing factor.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 07:22 PM
222

Male feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/19 11:50 AM
4

I look forward to the feminist lobby fighting this obvious violation of equality.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:15 PM
29

Yes but when they take all of the rape statistics to advocacy groups, the government, or the UN; guess who looks like they're in dire need of support and funding due to the crisis? That's the real kicker.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:02 PM
2

To be fair, this is just one asshole on Twitter. I haven't seen a cascade of articles running with her hot take. Of course, that could be because those journalists have all been fired.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:09 PM
3

Wouldn't be surprised if it was a coordinated effort now that the hit pieces are coming out.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:09 PM
1

Goddamn. Down the rabbit hole I go.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:35 PM
3

Naturally, but I'd expect to hear 1 or 2 stories a year instead of none. The media would love to have that field day. Edit: Although, maybe it does happen and they get away with it so we never hear about it.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:25 PM
7

Not advocating for it, but I don't see why more ex-husbands don't kill their ex-wives because of stuff like this. Maybe not themselves but hiring someone to do it. "People learn to love their chains," I guess.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:11 PM
351

Yeah, happened to me too. Weird that Reddit admins don't know what brigading is.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/18 02:07 PM
3

"I can't be sexist/racist" is just the new "I'm not sexist/racist but..."
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:44 PM
34

And women who don't work earn 0% of what men make!! Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:43 PM
1

Are the bathrooms actually men's? Our dorm had single sex floors but the bathrooms were co-ed (and this was back in 2003/4, before the gender neutral fad). It's worth asking the RA the official designation. The locker rooms are clearly a problem though and I'd report it to the staff and, if it continued, to the resident life/title ix/whatever office. If you feel it necessary, you can absolutely file sexual harassment with the same offices. You don't need names.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:54 PM
34

1) Someone should find the uncensored version and post that on their page. 2) is it me or does that kid's icon have a swastika?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 03:12 PM
28

Funny that even her initial point is completely false.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:15 PM
1

Oddly enough, none of this is true in the slightest.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:28 PM
159

They work harder than girls and go on to become men that work harder and earn more than women. Some women then complain and try to pass laws because their mediocre effort isn't rewarded as much or more than someone who has worked harder their entire life.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:30 PM
15

Boys will be boys held to a higher standard than adult women.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:01 PM
6

Most people are being reasonable and shutting it down. Good on Reddit.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:19 PM
13

It's exactly what you'd expect. They're also barely punches and not to the face. He strikes downward with the bottom of his fist, like a hammer fist strike and to the side of the head (first one kind of catches her near the jaw before she hides her face). Probably more to disorient and distract than actually hurt someone, especially with so little windup. It doesn't feel good but there's no real risk there. There are better ways to make someone compliant but most people don't train for the years…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/18 06:54 PM
25

Men are trafficked less but not an insignificant amount: 36% in 2016. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/02/08/boys-silent-victims-sex-trafficking/1073799001/
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:05 PM
1

My only gripe with DDG is there's no year option for limiting results by a time period. Day, week, and month just don't cut it and I frequently have to use another search engine.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:03 PM
15

Simona Sharoni, a professor of women’s and gender studies Oh boy. No one could ever have seen this coming.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:11 PM
2

Assuming you disproved the golden cow of wage gap with evidence. Then they proceeded to tell you how you can't see the curve of the Earth from a plane. Oh wait. That's flat Earthers. I get them confused with feminists sometimes because they're both delusional zealots.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 06:12 PM
6

Apu is one of the few positive male character portrayals. Sure he has an accent and runs a convenience store but they're harmless stereotypes based in reality.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:42 PM
7

Make sure you are posting this in other hackathon, coding, etc. forums. This behavior is a justified death sentence for EarthxHack. Why would anyone put in the effort required to compete in a hackathon if they were just going to hand the 1st place to a team of lazy, talentless assholes?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:25 PM
3

Maddox covered this back when it was a thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6TiRJNI-Q
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:19 PM
5

Democrats, man. At least Republicans just get caught sucking a dick through a glory hole in a men's room, like any other respectable human being.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 12:09 PM
4

The first person on Mars should probably be Elon Musk.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:31 AM
2

It's nice to see stupid headlines come out of somewhere other than California for once.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 11:43 AM
1

It wasn't just being conservative. He had donated $1000 to California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage. Still a shit reason, especially considering it was such a small amount.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:35 PM
17

Especially true when they're the only ones people take seriously.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:39 PM
3

Why is she even being questioned? Listen and believe, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/18 01:30 PM
1

Request tag for misleading title.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:43 PM
4

Could be a fair with several groups. Seems to be enough people.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:05 PM
6

All I need to know: no one is going to stop the guys kicking my ass for speaking up. Contact the authorities, which is what the sign should be promoting.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:22 PM
14

No, but often times a woman won't face violence, just harassment. If you're a man, and you interject yourself, you'll often times find yourself in a physical altercation, often with disastrous results. The thread is full of examples: comas, permanent disability, even murder; just for saying something. Often times, it's better just to let it go. She'll walk away uncomfortable but alive far more often than not. If you step in, you're almost certainly getting into a fight. Someone harassing a woman…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:16 PM
4

True, but there are rarely exact equivalencies like this. On average, men work harder and longer than women. Potentially, a 36 hour a week, new hire female employee must be paid the same as her 48 hour a week, senior male colleague. (and does that protection extend to men, as well?) Possibly not though, but if there's any truth to Iceland being "the first," it must differentiate from current equal pay acts in some meaningful way, which should raise some suspicion.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:54 PM
3

And, not that it matters on its own, isn't the third picture him grabbing her ass? It, at least, suggests something mutual. Maybe a relationship, previous consent, or just that kind of friendship. Who knows?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:21 PM
25

No, he hasn't. In fact, he explicitly stated he didn't force himself on her. Like a politician, of course. He doens't "remember the rehearsal for the skit in the same way." https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-al-franken-accused-forcibly-kissing-groping-woman-n821381
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:17 PM
2

True. I hadn't thought of it that way.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:44 PM
8

Considering they link to r/againstmensrights to justify why they're against the MRM, I wouldn't hold my breath on them actually being 1) effective or 2) decent human beings.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:01 PM
5

Now if we can just, somehow, let CNN know it isn't just men who commit sexual assault... That would really help quell the misandry rising out of this situation. I'm a little surprised Jennifer Lawrence's story wasn't more newsworthy. I'm guessing because it was a female executive since the internet would have lost its collective shit if a male had forced women to line up nude and told her to lose weight.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:35 PM
1

Aren't all 4 co-creators of Twitter white males?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:06 PM
2

That person should always have their identity protected, however, until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:41 PM
1

That's a small sample. In my experience, it's the complete opposite. Most of the young men I know are far more responsible and adult than the women. The women can barely take care of themselves and have no life skills. They can't cook, their bathroom perpetually looks like they're 12, their home looks like absolute garbage, they "literally can't even," they can't even get up for work on time. It's like the glorification of the slacker is now fashionable, sort of how it was for men in years past.…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:54 PM
5

Get Him to the Greek. He actually says he's just been raped too.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 01:05 PM
8

I've always read that poor people always blow all their money because they never learned to save since they never had the luxury. Money was always spent: bills, food, etc. and as a result they constantly spend, since that's the only way they've ever known. That's why the homeless guy who finds a winning lotto ticket is broke in 3 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/17 01:01 PM
-1

Turns out fish don't need a bicycle but they really want one.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:53 PM
3

some of the boys refuse to believe the wage gap exists lol. Never change, Clem. Bringing attention to men's issues gets a little easier each time she opens her mouth.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:32 PM
143

You know, in comics, this is the kind of thing that results in the Punisher showing up in your home and blowing your head off.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:26 PM
8

The author seems to be one of the rare cases where they don't agree with Jaye but are willing to give her a fair shake. They can't help but put their own spin on a few things (DV, "man's world," etc.) but they represented her fairly, which has been few and far between in Australia so far.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 12:23 PM
5

The healing lodge in Maple Creek, Sask., is under the management and control of Correctional Service Canada. I mean, on one hand she's in the prison system but on the other why isn't she in actual prison for killing a kid? Why not 26 months in the healing lodge to deal with her addiction then 20 years in prison? I mean, I know why but goddamn, Canada.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:44 PM
-6

This is clearly being misrepresented by OP. He was on the couch following an argument because he wouldn't stop working 16 hour shifts, which he was doing to save up money to take her on a surprise trip. You really can't assume she's some horrendous slave driver since there is 0 evidence here to support that. He made the wrong choice, for the right reasons; for a long time, and paid a steep price for it.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:28 PM
3

Not just genitals but bone structure of the pelvis and hips contribute a lot to men's natural sitting position. A user touched on it a while back: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1mnqrk/why_men_sit_with_their_legs_apart_spoilers_its/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:33 PM
1

Spot on. Excellent post!
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:48 AM
3

Agreed this really isn't MR related but $75,560 is what it costs for an individual at, likely, the lowest cost possible. A prisoner. Meanwhile, minimum wage is what it is for free citizens. Not that $15+/hr is feasible either but it just reinforces how fucked the system is.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:08 PM
37

Madrid: saving women from the tyranny of having to say "excuse me" before sitting next to someone.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:40 PM
1

Unsubscribe’s officially. Unsubscribe’s 's
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:42 PM
42

Even if those points are true, it’s completely irrelevant to the criticisms raised about people like Elam. What the author, unsurprisingly, doesn't realize is they have it backwards. Criticisms of Elam are completely irrelevant to those facts.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:49 PM
2

Aren't products labeled 'for men' usually scented in more traditionally masculine scents, even if the ingredients are exactly the same?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 01:54 PM
36

Bringing shame on one's family is still very much a thing in Japan. Maybe not as big as it was, but still more than most cultures.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 01:17 PM
22

Sounds like it until you have to date in your 30s. Gets too fucking real, really damn fast.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:58 PM
67

Is Lacy Green #4 prostitute in all Kazakhstan?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:09 PM
5

They do usually try to weasel claims in a way that is technically true but Farley's claim was a woman is paid less "simply because she isn't a man" and was rated Mostly True.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 06:03 PM
112

Politifact is notoriously inconsistent and biased. For instance: http://archive.is/x6jNP
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:11 PM
6

You have every right to complain to whatever office oversees faculty. Questions and alternative view points are not disruptive.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:57 AM
7

The last one is fucking cringeworthy. The first 2 aren't bad but don't make me think "beer." They look like some abstract painting that happens to have beer in it, instead of making it the focus, and while the first of the original ads don't really put the beer up front, it has the whole beach theme which is common for beer ads so the theme fits.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:31 PM
3

She says there's no excuse for what happened but spends half the time scapegoating Trump and refers to students' "righteous anger." That fanatic sense of moral superiority is the problem, not something to be lauded.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:25 PM
1

Weren't all subs with over a certain amount of subscribers asked if they wanted to be a default? I can absolutely be mistaken here but I swear I read that a while back. Edit: grammar because, although I clock in at 7:30, my brain doesn't come in until noon.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:03 PM
1

"How we think men's lives work" by 2 delusional women.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:45 PM
-2

Although, I'm not sure I agree with this, if this is what it takes to actually make bodily autonomy the norm, it's worth it.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:10 PM
2

Sometimes. In some places, the mother can put the kid up for adoption by herself and isn't required to notify the father. It may go both ways, but I'm not sure if anyone knows for sure since it's likely a rare occurrence.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:51 PM
1

They should probably throw "Again" on the end of this.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:14 PM
20

Here's the BJS' latest study on the highest demographic (18-24) for female victims of rape and sexual assault: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf TL;DR: It's about .61% for students and .76% for non-students. Note this encompasses both rape and sexual assault.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:31 PM
12

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199507/crime-and-punishment
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:19 PM
20

Also not an excuse.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:28 PM
79

This isn't the half of it. She's getting a biographical feature film, starring Rosario Dawson, called A Little Piece Of Light.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 12:44 PM
4

There's no "if." Then there's shit like this: https://www.aei.org/publication/no-country-for-burly-men/
/r/MensRights20/01/17 01:46 PM
1

Wait. This isn't the 2017 NAMBLA calendar?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:30 PM
8

Insecure sad woman: the article.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:17 PM
161

Probably something along the lines of "One person isn't everyone. Why don't all you privileged men get that?"
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:44 PM
3

Cracked has been shit for years but they're making fun of the men's birth control shot nonsense that went around earlier this year. Although the "burden" of birth control is laughable.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:41 PM
4

Not anymore. Women use health insurance more, so they were charged more. Now that is illegal after the Affordable Care Act. Men use auto insurance more, and are charged more. However, they can still be charged more, even when insurance is required to drive.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:23 PM
3

MRAs will always be associated with whatever phantom boogiemen the radical left can dream up. I'm surprised they haven't linked MRAs to the satanic daycares from the 80s/90s.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:20 PM
15

Google "Die cis scum" That's a good start.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:41 PM
9

Around for nearly 100 years. As soon as it's even possible that it might apply to women, it needs to be reviewed to see if it's even relevant anymore. Although, I guess they decided it won't apply to them anyway.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 03:36 PM
451

It's kinda sad that this is something that stands out.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 02:25 PM
1

Considering this was debunked the same day the media picked up the story, the Daily Show is embarrassingly slow on the uptake. Not that they've ever been much for even handed reporting, even for comedy, but it's a pretty far cry from the Stewart days, even if he was pretty far left of center.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:06 PM
10

"How can I make myself somewhat relevant for another 15 minutes? I'll write more bat shit crazy nonsense! Jackpot!"
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:33 PM
13

women have always carried the burden of birth control What fucking burden? Freedom? Moderate side effects and a wealth of options?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:26 PM
12

Some of these people better get a hell of a lot more interesting then. Society's appreciation of the female body is all most of them have.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:26 PM
5

Every TwoX post has been downvoted too. However, TwoX isn't the entire world and there are plenty of morons out there posting plenty of sexist bullshit in regards to this.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:17 PM
1

I'm curious if women are doing that much more around the house or is it that what men are doing isn't being considered "unpaid housework." Or are they not considering paid work and simply rounding both sexes time to be equal, which isn't correct. Lots of questions, for sure.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 03:56 PM
5

Exercising sexual power is what unattractive women call objectification. It's not surprising they don't know anything about it though.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:27 PM
24

It's why Rey is such a boring character. She doesn't earn anything and breaks the established rules of the universe to make it possible.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:23 PM
97

Was it self-defense? All I'm seeing is a shitty picture. Some background information, with evidence one way or another, would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:13 PM
5

98 out of 100 Ugh. How is anyone THIS stupid in %current year%
/r/MensRights19/10/16 12:01 PM
2

Yes. We makes excuses when they fuck up.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:29 PM
1

Although, I despise these kinds of "feel good, do nothing" campaigns; it's great they actually include men. It's sad that adding this is so simple and rarely done. Is it really that fucking hard? Of course, they'd have to see men as human, which is impossible for so many of usual suspects.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:36 PM
1

It may be because of the pervasive myth that men can't be the victims of sexual assault and rape. They may have felt the need to call it out explicitly.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:31 PM
6

It does seem odd that they'd fire so many men only to find so many women, in tech especially, best qualified for the jobs.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:15 PM
6

I really think you've underestimated just how much political power she has.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:53 PM
0

Of course. Center of mass is the largest target. It just so happens to be full of our most important parts, but knowing the consequences of shooting someone and intending to kill them are two completely different things.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:55 PM
4

She drew her weapon, aimed it, shot to kill, and we're supposed to pretend she didn't intend to kill this guy? Actually, yes. The intention of shooting a suspect is to incapacitate them to eliminate the threat they present, death is just an unfortunate side effect sometimes. Now, if she should have shot them is another matter entirely.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:25 PM
2

Are you surprised these people are morons? I mean, what did you really expect? A moment of reflective self-awareness as their fragile reality falls apart around them and they realize they've been perpetrators of hate? I'd sooner believe Jesus and Buddha have returned and are giving out free handjobs at Costco.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 02:54 PM
47

9 times out of 10, if you have to ask that question, the answer is "yes."
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:51 PM
1

I'm kind of surprised there are 8 other people that stupid.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:07 PM
3

He actually wasn't correct, in my understanding. Egon explains that simply shutting the power off would cause an explosion. This implies there is a proper shutdown procedure for their high voltage laser containment system which is perfectly safe but cutting all power immediately causes a chain reaction like dropping a bomb on the city.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:50 AM
1

Does anyone know how this turned out? The article is from January, last year.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:55 AM
15

These women have the right to turn around and go home. That's it. If they can't operate in every day society, then they need counseling to get over their issues. The whole of society doesn't need to cater to them.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:02 PM
3

Given IPV stats, maybe they should be teaching little girls to keep their hands to themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:51 AM
12

Shouldn't there have been some kind of security there to prevent these worthless fucks from getting on stage?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:55 AM
6

Actually, 33 country study. I thought this was widely linked on MR already. It shows the wage gap is about 1.6%. http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/13/equal-pay-for-equal-work-were-almost-the
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:45 PM
13

Surveys have shown that women round the world are paid less for equal work Except they JUST published a 30 country study proving, definitively, the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:39 PM
50

Well she thinks she's worth as much as a male actor the A list star actor.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 12:42 PM
3

Another issue that should be addressed is girls like this grow up to think they can hit a man with impunity only to find out that a man will hit them back. This is a major cause of DV as studies show women initiate most IPV when it is bidirectional (and far more often abuse unilaterally).
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:26 PM
1

So they agree with having to sign up for the SS? Because the pay gap is a myth.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:52 AM
4

It's just as easy, and probably more accurate, to say that we celebrate women's sexuality more than men's, which is why this is viable. It's also easy to say that there's a lower bar for what's considered attractive when it comes to women, considering all these women need to do is be half-way decent looking and wear skimpy clothing, whereas a man would need a far more chiseled physique. So, really, I'm not seeing any legitimate complaints and that's without even considering agency.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:49 AM
5

Not only should be be in prison and registered as a sex offender, she should be forcefully and permanently sterilized.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 12:03 PM
3

Although I'm not a Christian, I have to say this was pretty interesting and relevant to modern times.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:59 PM
0

Interesting! You're absolutely correct too, IMO. Intent and execution make all the difference. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:09 PM
1

Really, who supports forced conscription anyway? You can argue that it's a necessary evil at times, but it's still an evil. That said, it's the complete denial of government support if a man doesn't sign his life over to his government that I disagree with; but, if he must, so should women.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:30 PM
35

Well, this wins my "stupidest content" award for today.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:42 PM
1

Well, that was only a matter of time.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:54 AM
1

In the States, men use their insurance more often so insurers charge them more based on that. However, in many states, insurance is necessary to legally drive. That being the case, I'm not sure why no one has made the link between health insurance, which was recently changed to disallow charging women more for using a necessary service more often, and auto insurance. They're practically identical.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:52 PM
1

Yup, without hesitation or restraint. There's not much to discuss. If you get violent with someone, you have it coming, regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:33 PM
2

Relevance to MR?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:10 PM
1

Anyone who isn't a complete idiot knows unrealistic standards exist for men. They exist for women too, but women's standards are much more relaxed than men's. There is an extremely small selection of "ideal male" physiques but a much wider acceptance of "ideal female" physique.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:32 PM
1

I agree. If they aren't productive, then they need to go because they aren't pulling their weight in what is supposed to be a partnership. If the working spouse comes home and needs to do much of any domestic upkeep, then the stay at home partner isn't pulling their weight. In a 40+ hour week, like the working spouse is pulling, you can take care of everything at home, and kids are no excuse. At one point they're too young to be mobile, at another you can put them in a playpen or other safe area…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 12:34 PM
2

It’s ironic that a film popular with men fearing a world controlled by women turns out to have been made by transgender siblings What movie did they watch? Also "MRAs hate transgender women." Since when? Did anyone tell them? I don't think MRAs know this.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:28 PM
1

No, shit like that is never justifiable, although some people certainly say it.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:54 PM
2

Serial rapist walks, but patriarchy and rape culture against women.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 01:19 PM
4

Well, to be fair, female porn stars bring in the money. The males are largely disposable, like many female athletes.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:26 PM
1

It also says only 5% of scholarships have gender restrictions. Of course, having 4 times the number available skewed towards the majority isn't something to just overlook because they only account for a small number.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:43 PM
1

Feminists like these are just plain stupid. Assuming all their "systematic oppression" nonsense to be true, it can only mean that privileged groups could not be oppressed on a macro level. Since oppression/privilege is almost entirely binary (male/female, black/white, cis/lgbt, etc.) the privileged groups couldn't be oppressed because both sides can't be. However, on a micro level, individuals of either group can absolutely experience racism, sexism, etc. It's like these fucksticks are taking cr…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:20 PM
1

Thanks for the clarification!
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:52 PM
0

As others have said, I'm supportive but any issues you raise must affect all or most men. Not just some. Most often when someone asks what you're asking, they actually have been bringing up other issues without noticing. Of course, with such a diverse group, you could also have encountered less than supportive people.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:56 PM
2

Of course. Everything is sexist towards women. I took a shit this morning, which will eventually mean that my septic system requires pumping, which means that some woman's husband will have to do his (unpleasant) job instead of working around the house and raising children, which feeds into the patriarchy and reinforces the notion that women should be taking care of the home and kids. Defecation is a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:20 PM
1

Are they talking about flexible work schedules, part-time, or are the two the same in Australia? In the States, flexible schedules are full time that allow you to shift your typical 8 or 9 hours slightly to accommodate normal life. Say you work 9-6, but need to leave early. You could work 8-5 that day instead.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:51 PM
3

Such a pleasant cunt. I can't imagine why he would have given her the finger.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:50 PM
19

female students will learn that “if you get raped at UVa and you file a report on it, you are fair game to be viciously attacked years after the attack if the administration feels it is in their best interest,” Only if you lie. If that's the case, boo fucking hoo.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:40 PM
8

Jesus, don't let the feminists find out they can successfully jail someone for dream rape.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:20 PM
9

I'm always amused that these authors lack so much self-awareness or knowledge of the industry. Women are far and above, the vast majority when it comes to purchase and use of sex toys. Yet, she seems to think men will be the (near) sole purchasers of sexbots. Hell, this author almost certainly has several faux dicks of her own that she uses near daily and has near to no embarrassment about it. Meanwhile, I've never met a single man who openly admits to owning or using a fleshlight without some d…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:17 PM
3

As a guy with long hair for nearly 20 years I hope, at least, that becomes standard.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:46 PM
3

When I hear people like this, I assume they're in this situation because they have nothing of value to offer besides sex.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:58 PM
3

All legitimate points about playing the victim but it's also important to remember that not all men are aged, thoroughly lived, individuals. Some are just barely adults, raised with the message that they're horrific oppressors.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 03:00 PM
1

For a long time the legal definition of rape was restricted to women only. "....female against her will...." something along those lines.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:34 PM
1

Man, not to go off topic but wasn't she guarding Jabba's palace in Jedi?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:03 PM
3

It shouldn't be surprising. Trolls have always targets 2 types of people: the easily riled and the profoundly stupid. Feminists almost always fall into both categories. It's low hanging fruit. Not only that but on feminism's holy crusade of re-education, they cannot resist engaging with anyone who says something inconsistent with their beliefs. It's not even that they want to; they HAVE to.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:21 PM
2

The key is that combat roles are OPEN to them. Not that they'll be forced into them, if they can't hack it. They can be drafted, forced through basic training as many times as necessary, then put into a role they can fill adequately. Now that all roles are open to women, there is no legitimate reason they could not be drafted. At the very least, they absolutely should be required to sign up for selective service or be denied nearly any government benefit available, including employment, just as …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:29 PM
70

Good for you, man (no sarcasm). It sounds like you got it off your chest without being cruel. Too many people revel in the opportunity to hurt someone they've had an issue with. Sounds like you were just objective and honest. Still, you can be in a relationship without looking for marriage (I am). You just need to be upfront about that from the beginning. You have more than enough reason to not want to be married. Any good woman (assuming you're straight) would understand that.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:20 PM
2

The problem with the whole transgender bathroom debate is that bathrooms are segregated by sex, not gender. Your identity doesn't mean anything, nor does your comfort. Maybe they just need to switch from male/female to penis/vagina and be done with the debate.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:55 PM
7

This was shared by a female friend of yours, that's why it says "herself." Try a post from a male friend and it changes to "himself."
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:15 PM
4

"Feminist thinks" seems to be a contradiction in this case.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:46 PM
3

It's been 72 degrees at work every summer I've worked there and I find my 90 degree "summer appropriate" attire lacking for warmth in the office? Better wear the exact same thing every day.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:54 AM
1

Oh, the female ego. I think she's explained why she can't find a guy by simply writing this dreck.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:05 PM
3

They think giving the black panthers a safe space is noble goal? Jesus. Might as well tout the fact that neo-nazis and the KKK could benefit from this as well.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:00 PM
0

Considering his off-hand mention of being white has nothing to do with the topic he was discussing, it seems like the problem is yours.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:39 PM
1

Yeah, statements like that bring one's credibility into question, and I am not being sarcastic in the least.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:40 PM
1

Does she have alzheimer's? She seems to be confused as to what year it is and the current state of the world.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:07 PM
2

Without clicking on the video, I imagine they're trying to create some discussion about how talking about your period is taboo. There's a reason it is: it's disgusting. It's part of your body's waste removal process. How about #LiveTweetYourShit or #LiveTweetYourPiss next? No?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:56 PM
6

Eh, I can't consider this promoting sexism. If they do several ads and they're all like this, maybe, but this was one ad. Let's not fall into the same paranoid delusions as feminism and start thinking that every individual perceived slight against men is "promoting sexism."
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:47 PM
3

As soon as I see a thumbnail of Sarkeesian, I know one of two things is happening: 1) She's making up more poorly informed bullshit 2) Someone is coming to her undeserved rescue
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:55 AM
1

Teaching women to communicate effectively instead of expecting their partners to pick up on minor cues (something scientifically proven to be ineffective)? Wow, what a novel idea.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:19 PM
11

Didn't you see John Wick? It was, rightfully, hailed as one of the best action films of 2014. He does the calm, stoic badass extremely well. Not the best in terms of emotional range, but what he does, he does very well; and let's be honest, that's how Hollywood works anymore: typecast.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:35 PM
3

Assistance? How about assisted suicide? (joking, naturally). She should be in prison if they prove it was malicious.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:07 PM
9

So basically it's "I know what I did was wrong but it's been so hard to meeee."
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:19 PM
1

Of course not. He's probably still complaining about violence against women in video games. Which, by comparison, is non-existent.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:53 AM
2

Sarkessian is nice to him because he believes her BS narrative. They're also friends IRL, so it's not surprising she would call him.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:26 PM
2

She's in the right, but still a complete asshole based on how she's going about everything.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:53 PM
4

Just makes me think about that t-shirt that says "what about all the good things Hitler did?" I mean, all she had to do to make one halfway decent video was scam thousands of people, create a hostile and toxic environment, fake being a gamer, steal YouTube footage, and have no knowledge of an industry she was criticizing. Not to mention all her BS contemporary feminist hatemongering that didn't relate to gaming. She's beyond redemption and just needs to go away.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:06 PM
13

And not one legitimate defense of their actions.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:34 PM
37

Solid post. Your only mistake was thinking people already engaged in hysterics were going to step back and look at something objectively. That's not to bash the users of 2x, but as a statement of fact. The expectation of a reasonable and open discourse was actually unreasonable. Although, it was through no fault of your own. At least you tried.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:59 PM
2

Economic Left/Right: -0.5 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.54
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:00 PM
0

But the rest of the civilized world offers paid leave. Waaaaaah! In all seriousness, the rest of the world does. The rest of the world also isn't one of the, or THE, largest economy in the world with the highest earnings. If women alone were given paid 9 months of maternity leave, EVERYONE else's wages lower. That's pretty self-serving, self-important, and selfish.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:19 AM
1

Morally? Absolutely. Physically is up for debate, but it shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:16 AM
1

Dafuq? If Jessica Valenti were the main character, maybe; almost none of this is consistent with the narrative or character.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:07 AM
1

Sent. Considering AMD has a female CEO, that made is on qualifications and experience, Intel really should find better methods or goals. Diversity is great and all, but there's no point in forcing it. They should take that $300 million and invest it into lower income areas; providing people, who have actual hurdles to overcome, an education they would never get otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:09 PM
0

Sounds like an art project taken over by a violent, predatory woman. Whether he stopped it or not, she was not invited to sexually assault him. I hope they investigate it fully and it's not just written off because he's male. Until then, I'm withholding judgment, as everyone should do in any accusation. It is worth noting that this is being handled, by the public, in a much more reasonable fashion than it would be if he were a woman. Or it's simply their lack of interest due to his sex.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:34 PM
1

Never.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:23 PM
1

Guess I'll be switching to Chrome. I stuck with Firefox through Eich even though I disagree with him because he was never pushy or preachy about his beliefs. He followed what he believed in and donated modest amount of money to a cause that supported that belief. Watters on the otherhand is already a preachy scumbag who is behaving unprofessionally and far below Eich. Shitcan her.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:26 PM
40

Good, and the 3 that voted for "guilty until proven innocent" should be stripped of their ability to make decisions for the rest of the population.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:26 PM
1

Personally, I'd rather not point fingers with the environment. Can't we just fix the damn problem regardless of who is screwing the planet more?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:45 PM
1

I don't really consider good science a MR perspective, but if you Google "wage gap myth" you will find a wealth of mainstream sources. Time, Forbes, CBS, even Huffington Post. You know it's an embarrassing falsehood when even the most socially liberal sites publish facts on the wage gap.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:44 PM
1

Not really sure why this is labeled 'discrimination'. I guess being a male swinging a sword at the cops might slightly increase your chances of being shot.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:29 PM
2

I refuse to even click on this garbage. Nothing that comes from this woman has ever been worth my time or attention. She's a self-serving, manipulative con-artist that has had success because internet feminists are plentiful and moronic. She doesn't care about gaming or gamers. She wants to spit thinly veiled misandry under the guise of equality and get rich off of people too stupid to see through her BS.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:21 PM
12

It's interesting that most of the comments only reinforce the point he's made.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:53 PM
12

Why women need to start asking men out... because too many women view an unwanted advance as harassment. The end.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:49 PM
4

Nice catch. I took that a completely different way.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:15 PM
6

Ah, good call. I didn't really get that from it, but Thunderf00t is clever. I wouldn't put it past him. Unfortunately, it seems like a lot of people also didn't get that from the video either.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:31 PM
-2

Solid video until he gets to his criticisms of Whedon's work (which is most of it, unfortunately). I'm not sure if he'd just never seen them, is intentionally misrepresenting them, or honestly doesn't see the obvious; but he's really far off base. Which is pretty rare for Thunderf00t. The only thing he really needed to use to deflate Whedon's statement was 30+ years of video games. Some women are getting cut up in a video game? Welcome to the party. It's been men, and only men, for the last 3 de…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:33 PM
5

Kinda sucky, but it's in Japan. I have no interest in forcing western gender politics on another country. If only Hilary Clinton could get her ass on board with that type of thinking...
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:25 PM
2

Anonymous is credited with making sure everything went to trial, but they also misidentified several individuals and made sure that completely innocent and unrelated people were treated as if they were rapists. I don't consider that "help" as much as reckless.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:46 PM
6

Women become girls when they expect men to:
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:21 PM
-1

I had thought about that myself, but this turned me off to the idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-vasectomy_pain_syndrome Unfortunately, that would mean dealing with nutjobs. Your call either way, but not everyone has heard of PVPS and I wanted to toss that bit of information your way.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:26 PM
3

Hey, whatever works for the two of you. Openly tell everyone else to eat a bag of dicks and mind their own business, if they don't respect your decisions.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:21 PM
2

You obviously can't fucking read.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:20 PM
1

A friend mentioned this law firm to me and I thought I would share it here.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:06 PM
1

haha. I could have been more clear in my wording too. So not entirely your fault, mate.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:29 PM
0

The consequences of Feminist-influenced 'creep hysteria' Can't be much plainer than that.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:11 PM
4

Unfortunately, it's pretty fair, but also incomplete. We do spend a lot of effort being anti-feminist, sometimes when it's not warranted, but that user seems to think being anti-feminist isn't often justified. If they weren't so small-minded, they'd be open to the idea that feminist policy, lawmakers, and victim advocacy dollars are one of the leading reasons men get "the shit end of the stick" a lot of times.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:44 PM
2

I'm still not sure why people think that girls should be "embracing bossy." If people are calling your kid bossy, maybe you should consider your kid is being an asshole and needs some adult intervention. If you can't be a leader without being an asshole, you don't need to be a leader. Your sex doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:29 PM
-2

Really isn't the fault of feminism, although feminism most certainly would have exacerbated the problem, it was not the cause.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:18 PM
11

The worst part is they had the beds for men, but they refused to use them. Now it's being renovated to expand services for women.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:50 PM
4

There's no justification for her actions. It was premeditated and, given her unusually brutal murder of a presumed innocent man, she should be executed or thrown in jail. She could have just as easily drugged him and went to the police, or just went to the police even without drugging him. All of that is assuming a rape even happened, which will now be difficult to prove since she killed the alleged perpetrator.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:46 PM
3

Excellent blog post.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:27 PM
7

This actually doesn't perpetuate the wage gap myth. "However, the 77-cent gender gap that Obama is criticizing is calculated workforcewide and does not represent a comparison of equivalent positions." "The report by the White House Council on Economic Advisers says Obama's proposal to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 would shrink the gender wage gap by nearly 5 percent, since women are more likely to earn minimum wage." What they're suggesting is that by raising minimum wage,…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:15 PM
6

Interesting article. Bad title (the article's, that is)
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:37 PM
0

The previous version included "for the same work." Previous version: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/21/barack-obama/barack-obama-ad-says-women-are-paid-77-cents-dolla/
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:24 PM
2

Their justification is because they've dropped "for the same work." Women do make 77 cents to a man's dollar, however women work less, have less experience, go into lower paying fields, don't negotiate salary aggressively, etc.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:24 PM
67

And nothing of value was lost by her refusal.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:26 PM
2

As I see it, there are a few problems with your argument. One is NAFALT. Yeah, a lot of them aren't being bigoted assholes, but a lot are; and the good ones are doing nothing to stop them. There are also too many assholes of their ilk in positions of power. Second, some of the things they view as "equality for themselves" are actual privilege (a special right) and do not promote equality. Sometimes, those things actually push equal rights backwards. As far as courts occasionally letting a guilty…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:12 PM
1

Sommer's book is very well respected, as is she. That is, as much as a controversial view can be respected. At one time, a book supporting inter-racial marriage wouldn't have been respected either. So, your professor's argument doesn't hold water. Furthermore, the critique given is by someone who already has firm beliefs differing from Sommer's; going as far to say that contemporary ideals of manhood signify a "turning away from women." Something your instructor failed to research. That aside, y…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:44 PM
1

Google "Wage Gap Myth." You'll find all the information you need.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:42 PM
3

I think you missed the entire point of the article. Not only that, but the title you've written is completely off-point.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:38 PM
42

I would probably just reply "Please check your privilege." But that's if I ever intended to continue any association with this person, which I probably wouldn't after such blatant idiocy.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:55 PM
19

Femsplaining at it's finest.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:18 PM
6

I actually came in to question something others already have: who is Emma Roberts? Granted, that shouldn't matter, but a barely D-list celebrity against 2 up and coming celebrities (at the time of their DV incident) isn't a very good comparison. No question about it, it wouldn't matter which female celebrity did what she did, everyone would forget about it immediately. It's just not a very good comparison, IMO.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:22 AM
7

There most certainly are LGBT MRAs, but most of the LGBT community has a collective of issues all their own that are often, but not always, at the forefront of their struggle. Typically, at least IMO, a gay man is seen as a moral and spiritual abomination long before he's seen as a pedophile rapist who needs to be taught to check his privilege and not to oppress. Although, perhaps the widely recognized disadvantage of gay men prevent them from being as sensitive to the different problems straigh…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:19 AM
1

I'm kinda interested in how that IP was traced. Looks like Facebook, but users can't trace IPs on Facebook without access to secure servers. Questionable at best.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:38 AM
1

Interesting. Although, I'd prefer the original article. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find it even via Google.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:22 AM
1

Uploaded in 2011.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:56 AM
6

Probably not the right sub, but make it clear that she and her son are no longer welcome in your apartment until she gets her little shit under control.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:34 PM
2

Interesting, if true, but it wouldn't be the first study to have been botched.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:40 PM
3

I think you mean the accuser. In that case, the claim is not at all anonymous. Considering the students have complained that the administration has followed up on the claims, it is very apparent that they want the ability to claim rape completely anonymously (with absolutely no follow up to their claim - only punishment for the accused), as I've been protesting this entire time.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:13 PM
4

Those are the ropes. Our justice system, be it criminal or otherwise, is based on the conviction to come forward and to have your claim challenged, as it should be. If you can't stand behind your claims, you shouldn't be making them.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:07 PM
6

The undue mental anguish for the accused is more than enough to make it serious.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:42 PM
3

The problem is its very existence. No one, man or woman, need to be making anonymous accusations about anything. Least of all, one of the most heinous crimes in human history. More so considering the mishandling of rape cases by universities at present. Feminist tool be damned, it's just plain idiotic to allow someone to levy criminal allegations without any proper examination. Especially a crime like rape which almost always hinges on a he said/she said. The only way to make anonymous accusatio…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:19 PM
7

Anonymous reports are nonsense. When you can accuse someone of rape a year or more after the event has happened, anonymity has no place. What you seem to be missing is these students want to anonymously report a rape, have the accused punished, and not be any part of the process other than the anonymous report. No questioning, no examination, no proof required, only an anonymous online form and punishment. They don't want to be contacted in any way what-so-ever. It's an absolute load of bullshit…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:58 PM
5

TL;DR acquaintance was raped, won't report it because of rape culture TL;DR acquaintance was raped, won't report it because of rape hysteria. FTFY. It's not rape culture that causes these people to not report rape. It's the incorrect assumption that a rape culture exists.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:08 PM
3

Is 45% of the fan base being women a problem? I don't think so. Furthermore, these men choose to go into the UFC. Let's not start removing their agency and choice the way feminists have with the porn industry.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:33 PM
1

Not sure how this is MR related. Yeah, taxpayers shouldn't be paying for abortion but the restrictions the law puts in place are just moronic. That aside, it's completely off topic.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:19 PM
7

Yeah, this one was pretty bad and will surely be cherry-picked for the next decade as both evidence of the "patriarchy" and "MRA bigotry."
/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:46 PM
9

The toys marketed to girls have 2 things to do with their career choices: jack and shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:51 PM
121

Apparently, feminists don't know shit about ska (or MRAs for that matter).
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:46 PM
50

I'm not convinced this isn't another "woman, writing about another woman, who studied a woman, who talked to some men." Seems like they've defined "real" friends as the kind that sit around sharing their problems with one another. I'm beginning to believe women define friendships by sharing bad times, men define friendships by sharing good times.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:10 PM
12

I find myself questioning that constantly. Especially when considering that dreadful Sarkeesian woman. She disables comments for her videos but, miraculously (for her wallet), the one time she enables them; she's overwhelmed with rape and death threats.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:28 PM
1

This may as well be askWBC.tumblr.com They're just as crazy and bigoted.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:19 PM
40

She may have received "death threats," but I doubt they are from MRAs. Feminists often will say anyone is an MRA, if they exhibit any kind of negative behavior. I doubt the conversation went "I'm going to kill you, by the way here are my personal opinions on gender politics and how men are being treated in modern society."
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:15 PM
-2

This is a race issue, not a men's issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:52 PM
14

We really don't need to link to every idiotic thread on Reddit. But since we have, the whole thread is just a bunch of people screaming "STOP EXERCISING BODILY AUTONOMY!!" then hiding behind "lack of trust" because they can't logically justify their discomfort. The guy has every right and reason to do what he does and what he does with his own sperm, for any reason at all, is no woman's concern. Is he being paranoid? Probably, but his girlfriend needs to get over herself and realize: if she has …
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:37 PM
1

It's linked to their Facebook profile. A lot of sites are starting to do that. You can comment on a site using your Facebook profile. It's up to the mods, but it's the same thing as a Facebook post (revealing real life names and photos); something the mods, for good reason, aren't too keen on.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:35 PM
2

You need to delete and resubmit. As per the mod policy: "Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names."
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:26 PM
1

Only considering hard, empirical evidence; men are the majority victims of rape and violence (not sure about abuse). More men are raped yearly in prison alone than women in general society and men have always been the primary victims of violence. You can easily find reports on both online. The problem is framing victimhood from a female perspective, which often denies male victims legitimacy. Of course, that's not to play oppression olympics, both sexes have their fair share of issues, but femin…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:01 PM
2

Sounds dangerous. At least you made it out before you were seriously injured or otherwise harmed. Not that being pushed around and punched is at all minor but, in the grand scheme of things, you're going to make it and you're going to be better off. Good head on your shoulders, good future prospects. Seems she almost did you a favor by cutting her dead weight from your coattails.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:40 PM
2

Good for you, man (no sarcasm). A lot of people don't have the strength to make a decision like that, even when it is in their best interests. Perhaps this was one of those "darkest just before the dawn" times. Sounds like things are looking up. Best of luck with your newfound success.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:26 PM
3

Good. Although I can't agree with your decision to not press charges, it's your decision. I respect that. At least you will have documentation of the assault so she can't use it against you. There would be nothing worse than being assaulted, then being treated like the aggressor, dragged through the court system, and demonized by society. I really hope you've ended the relationship and won't be going back to her though.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:04 PM
2

I think you may be able to file a report without pressing charges, but I'm not a legal expert or police officer.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:44 PM
2

I don't believe so. Either way, if you wait it just makes your story look weaker. I see you mentioned above you are currently pursuing the assault charge. Best of luck. I'm sure many here would encourage you to update throughout the process too. Hopefully, few here will ever have to deal with what you have and sharing your experiences may help someone else down the line.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:12 PM
-1

It's a double standard. There's no reason. No one ever accused feminists of being logical or consistent.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:56 PM
4

File your own assault complaint, and do it before either of them file their bullshit claim. If you wait, you won't have any evidence and it'll just seem like you're being retaliatory.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:53 PM
1

You haven't talked about or thought about a damn thing. Just provided a link to the video. If you want a discussion, start it by providing some kind of comments with the submission. Thoughts, arguments, impressions; hell, a synopsis of the video would be better than nothing - which is exactly what you've provided and exactly why you won't be receiving the responses you're looking for. You've put no effort into the submission so it should be of little surprise you're not receiving any. Although, …
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:02 PM
7

Feminist Frequency has never had any legitimacy, much less the tropes vs women series. It's one non-gamer, scam artists', confirmation bias laden analysis of videos other people have played. In fact, within 48 hours, any video she releases will be absolutely torn apart by several channels with legitimate arguments. Hence, why comments are always disabled.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:25 PM
2

While it's completely and undeniably true, don't forget that many feminists use male-on-male violence, often the most prevalent kind, to justify why men's issues are irrelevant. You know, since we're just doing it to ourselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:37 PM
7

So, most users on this sub seem to believe that advancements in women's rights will cause men to lose their own rights, and that as more women gain power, men will face more sexism directed against them. Clearly, no time was ever actually spent in this sub. Next.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:23 PM
19

Funny that most of the comments only prove the author's point.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:30 PM
3

The Betchdel test never had any legitimacy.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:17 PM
3

HuffPo's UK site often has male-positive articles and deal with issues facing both sexes. Even their readers comments are often of an egalitarian nature. The US site, on the other hand, is often filled with the standard poorly written and supported feminist agenda followed by readers commenting, ad nauseam, about it being so true, the patriarchy, and "what about teh menz."
/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:31 PM
0

The latter.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 12:03 AM
19

Always hard to believe the difference in HuffPo's US and UK sites. Even their audiences.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 07:03 PM
5

Get it in writing, but I also have no desire to be a parent at this point in my life.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 07:38 PM
2

An incredibly douchey feminist writer/blogger. If you Google her, you'll find no shortage of her inane BS on sites like Alternet, Slate, and Jezebel.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:46 PM
8

"By Amanda Marcotte" Alt+F4. Next.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:37 PM
1

How many feminists have penis envy then? Although I'm sure this study is incredibly flawed, I wonder if the result is the same for homophobic women. In the media, homophobia is often spoken of as the exclusive realm of bigoted men when nothing could be less true.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:35 PM
2

Biology. Whatever rights you may think you have are not more important than another's ability to determine their own life. That should also include parental surrender in the case of men who don't want to be parents.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:29 PM
5

Yes, she's a masterful troll, but she needs to fade into obscurity as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:02 PM
3

Nope, but they should have the right to legally surrender their obligations and rights (ha!) to the child within a certain period after being notified of pregnancy/birth.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:32 PM
3

The internet is not about action. You can't take a collective of people who are hundreds and thousands of miles apart, who rely on anonymity, and start slinging accusations about inactivity. It's unrealistic and dishonest. The internet is only good for a handful of things, regarding these matters: consciousness raising, bringing people together, sharing ideas, and basic communication. There is no possible way to amass any form of action short of spending millions of dollars to bring people toget…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:29 PM
6

As always, a fantastic piece.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:10 PM
-2

/r/Feminism is probably posting them because the articles/pics support their beliefs. /r/MensRights are probably posting the same articles/pics because they're blatantly sexist. I often see articles posted on MR simply meant to bring awareness to how saturated and blind our culture is to misandry.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:03 PM
10

Would you expect anything different from a blog with the URL IHateMen.org?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:47 PM
1

You could find that in several dozen places every day. No need to link any of them. They're, typically, uninformed idiots who prefer it that way. There's no point in even lowering ourselves enough to engage them.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:29 PM
2

Relevance?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:11 PM
2

Sounds more like they're referring to "delivery" more than "guys." You can get some outsiders to work well with your organization due to your pleasant disposition is what they're driving at, but it's worded more casually.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:32 PM
1

You're just going to have to put your emotions aside and do it. Temporary discomfort is better than years of getting fucked by the legal system. A mediator is the way to go.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:42 PM
2

It is not the right place to post about it. That said, it's clear no one even knows what blackface is anymore. It isn't simply covering your face in a darker pigment so you can appear to be of a different race. Blackface was this: http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/blackface_3910.jpg Now THAT shit is offensive. Whoever Julianne is, she was not doing blackface.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:17 PM
1

Obviously lawyer up and start collecting any evidence of your own. There's already a lot of good advice here, but one thing I would urge you to do is, if and when you're found innocent, take the fight to her. Don't just put it all behind you and move on. Women like this will never learn their lesson if everyone just shrugs their actions off and goes on pretending nothing happened in an attempt to "put it all behind them." Not only would I, at least, attempt a sexual assault charge (intoxicated t…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:02 PM
1

They do see it. They just don't care because it serves their purpose. To them, people that don't agree with their beliefs deserve to be silenced. That's why it seems like they don't see it.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:40 PM
6

You're likely to just receive downvotes because you're about the thousandth individual to start a thread like this and people are tired of typing out the same answers. The short version is 'patriarchy theory = no common ground. ever.' Why would a movement dedicated to the advancement and fair treatment of men ally themselves with a group whose core belief structure is based on demonizing men as a whole? Could we find common ground on certain topics? Of course, but you may as well try to get a Je…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:32 PM
1

The text is a little self-righteous and goofy, but the situation is completely messed up. Hopefully, he gets justice.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:27 PM
2

That's really a matter of personal ethics and beliefs, and is the exact reason why abortion is not primarily a women's rights issue. It's a matter of when life begins and when said life has any rights first and foremost. Bodily autonomy is a distant second. Especially when women have so many good and reliable methods of birth control.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:05 PM
2

GWARGWARGWARGWAR
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:02 PM
9

Upvote for GWAR mention.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:39 PM
3

A culture that tolerates rape (even to the point of encouraging it). So, nothing like most of the cultures on Earth.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:33 PM
1

Legally, no, and that's how it should be. However, no man should be forced into financial slavery for a child he doesn't want either. Ideally, we all would have the ability to make choices regarding our own lives, but not the lives of others. Currently, women enjoy a bit of tyrannical freedom. Both free to make choices about their own lives, and the lives of others.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:27 PM
3

Inb4 ABC screencaps this as "evidence" of misogyny in the "Manosphere."
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:05 PM
3

Legitimately, they can't. However, if they continue to spin half-truths, they can complain to no end.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:41 PM
5

Nothing. It is her body, after all. Your input should be valued, but you shouldn't have authority over her decision. Conversely, she shouldn't be able to force you into financial slavery if you didn't want it and she did (but we know that isn't the case). You have the option of leaving her if she goes through with it, but that's really it. You certainly have every right to your opinions and feelings on the matter, but it's not your decision.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:53 PM
8

One post 3 months ago? Your great contribution to the community, that warrants a thread announcing your leaving, will be missed so very, very much.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:39 PM
-2

It's funny how intolerant the supposedly tolerant become once you fall out of step slightly. What they mean to say is "I'm tolerant of anyone who agrees with me all the time." Although I wasn't surprised the person who submitted the picture was the least educated on the subject.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:52 PM
2

You most certainly can offend the white male, but society tells him he's not allowed to be offended and to check his privilege.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:39 PM
6

Yup. I've had a woman nearly twice my size pin me to a table and give me several dozen hickeys and although I explicitly asked several individuals for help (the majority of which were friends) most laughed, congratulated me in some form, and ignored it. Mind you, this was also a table outside, in a public area, at a college. So, it's not as if people were scarce. Eventually it did end, when her friends were ready to head home, but only after an hour or two of forceful advances. I'm sure I could …
/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:42 PM
9

Defensive homicide applies where a person kills with the belief that their act of lethal violence was necessary to defend themselves, or another person, but where it is shown that they had no reasonable grounds for that belief. It doesn't sound like that should ever have been passed anyway. It's not defensive at all. It's incompetent homicide.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:23 PM
3

Interesting piece. Pretty fairly written, on the MRM side. However, I always viewed the red pill stuff as just a Matrix reference. Referring to really viewing how men are treated and being unable to unsee it, no matter how uncomfortable. I wasn't aware it was considered another fringe group like MGTOW or PUAs.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:16 PM
4

Not really, no. It is meant for pregnant women, postpartum women (6 months after pregnancy), and children under 5. Individuals who honestly do need nutrition. That said, I've seen some women using it that well past their fertile years. However, I suppose it's possible they were just doing the shopping for someone else.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:29 AM
1

Man, I feel like this should be linked on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:13 PM
10

I rarely identify with a group and I probably wouldn't even identify myself as an MRA. I've always been the devil's advocate, looking at both sides of a larger picture, and I've looked out for the little guy; eventually that became men. When feminism went from "women have problems" to "women have problems, men are the cause, and men have it easy," and it went unchecked, I began to identify with the MRM. As for why I don't identify with another group, you answered your own question: "why identify…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:22 PM
7

Originally, his comments could certainly be taken as offensive, but what he meant to say is: the literature he prefers happens to be written by men and he has no desire to teach material he doesn't feel passionately about simply because the author has a vagina. Completely legit, but it's more the "interviewer's" fault than his. Of course, no one will see it that way.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:23 PM
3

Probably, yes. As far as I know, most states consider unwed mothers to have sole custody until the father files for it. If you haven't, you may want to get on that now. edit: there also may be some form of paternity test too, so don't wait. You won't be getting DNA once your daughter is gone, I assure you.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:32 PM
1

Censorship and combating hypocrisy are two very different things.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:23 PM
2

The description alone doesn't make me want to waste 8 minutes of my life only to reaffirm that no, we don't, and her vocal proponents only prove how misguided the idea is.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:01 PM
5

This is one reason why the presumption of innocence and the need for evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt" is important in any case.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:18 PM
14

Same thing happens for "Men are alway slaves" and "I hate men."
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:20 PM
1

Yes they do. Plenty of women (you know, the sex without a penis) seem to think they know everything about one; which includes that an erection only happens when you're aroused and willing.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:29 PM
9

Magic Mike comes to mind as well. And 50 Shades was ridiculed; not protested, attacked, an criticized ad nauseam. It was recognized as the fantasy that it was (even if it was pedophilic Twilight fan fiction). Not that I mind any of these but, if feminists want a level playing field, they're going to have to adopt a scorched earth policy instead of ruining everyone else's fiction/fantasy while conveniently ignoring (stereotypically) women's.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:13 PM
6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUbPok1Ajq8
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:04 PM
31

Now he can ignore her forever. Ex-girlfriend mode engaged. Hopefully, at least.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:49 PM
9

Sounds about right. Someone recently got footage from one of her bullshit lectures (pre-kickstarter) where she admits to never playing games and having no interest in them. Everyone definitely got conned.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:12 PM
22

Dear god. What a waste of server space. As a lot of people are pointing out, it seems like Sarkeesian wrote it since it's filled with her usual BS and it's clear the writer hasn't played half the games or actually interacted with any of the community.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:02 PM
5

Obviously the tests are tainted by patriarchal bias. We all know schools cater to male behavior and thought patterns. /s
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:52 PM
3

I was going to say that this post is probably better suited to a rant sub, but that video was entirely too funny. Have an upvote and carry on.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:45 PM
3

By the quote in the title, it sounds like he's just comically commenting on the pure energetic chaos of young boys, which is 100% true, far more than he means it to be derogatory. However, I didn't watch the video so there may be more to it.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:03 PM
5

3 years ago, Dave Easton had a solid article but, you're right, they are often exactly as you have described. Here's Dave's article, btw: http://www.cracked.com/article_18760_6-things-everyone-knows-about-women-that-arent-true.html
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:52 PM
1

Luckily, the voltage only runs through the two barbs in her back. It's actually completely safe to touch someone while they're being tased or hit with a stun gun.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:36 PM
4

When tased, you lose control of your muscles. Therefore, it cannot be considered sexual harassment. Just an unpleasant accident.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:14 PM
3

It's nice when the first line is such provable bullshit that I don't have to waste my time reading the rest.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:51 PM
14

Very cool. Glad to see this.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:01 PM
2

Sad feminazi is sad.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:55 PM
2

I don't use Twitter, but my reply would have been something along the lines of "#killallmen ? #killyourself instead."
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:27 PM
3

It's almost like he's trying to prove their point.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:10 PM
7

I'm sure you hate hypocrites no matter their sex.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:41 PM
15

Someone trying to scream over you is as close to winning an argument over the internet as you can get.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:18 PM
1

Interesting, but that happens to every single individual that is the most visible in a perceived entertainment failing. She may not be aware of it, as someone who has only been in the limelight a few years, but it's hardly a uniquely female obstacle. Could you imagine being one of the men who worked on the ending for Mass Effect 3? Fuck. That.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:38 PM
1

Did anyone else notice that, when everyone thought females were the majority of victims of sexual assault in the military, it became a huge federal issue and everyone was outraged. Seems like the day it was revealed men are the majority of victims, everyone immediately lost interest. I mean, how much mainstream press has the issue seen since?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:26 PM
2

It's lol worthy, but not really suitable for this subreddit. Maybe /r/MRmemes
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:16 PM
1

Oh how quickly they turn on one of their own as long as he has a penis.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:16 PM
2

Ah. Well, at least that gives reason for hope. Best of luck in your endeavor and, please, keep us updated.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:32 PM
5

I can't recall which universities exactly but some student unions have blocked men's websites from being accessed through campus servers and gone as far to officially define any type of men's rights groups as misogynistic by nature, and therefore hate groups (thus banning them from campus). Hopefully, your university is a tad more progressive and open minded.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:09 PM
4

You may want to look into the issues the Men's Centre at Simon Fraser University faced when they opened.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:00 PM
45

Better than the gendered ones. Still, it's a lot of rhetorical nonsense.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:12 PM
0

Man, I went to read some of the comments and I immediately regret it. Someone should explain to their readers that you never go full retard.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:13 PM
2

Talking to her about it is usually a good place to start. There isn't going to be any one answer since relationships are personal and intimate. Let her know your needs and desires, while respecting hers. If you guys can't work together, why are you even dating?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:04 PM
3

Assuming the privilege exists, it's not privilege that's the problem. It's jealousy.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:03 PM
36

I really don't think a sperm donor has any right to a child. However, it seems like Jason Patric wasn't that. He was in a relationship with the woman, they used in vitro, and he maintained a presence in the boy's life. That's not a donor, that's a father. Donors provide their sperm and have nothing further to do with the process or child, let alone a romantic relationship.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:11 PM
4

I feel like, if you can't pay your dues, you don't deserve the benefits. Thinking otherwise is just entitlement. It's why I went into business for myself and why I don't want to have children. The things I would have to give up to raise kids properly, or climb a corporate ladder, are worth more to me than procreation or "success." I don't have some delusion that I should be able to work 40 hours a week or less, make $250,000 a year, and have kids; while still doing whatever I may feel like, simp…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:52 PM
-2

Stop advocating trolling.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:01 PM
-10

And reported.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:32 PM
24

"Why aren't more women working?" "Because we're not doing enough to cater to them." I really couldn't have predicted that answer...
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:07 PM
5

Kinda odd he'd find this type of thing the same day (I'd wager mere hours after) it was posted by a user with absolutely no history or presence on Tumblr. That's not to say it couldn't possibly be true. Just unlikely.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:14 PM
23

Have to admit I loled.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:41 PM
21

Meanwhile, groups like "I hate men" and "men are slaves" still exist. Not only do they exist, but report them and you'll receive a response explicitly saying they don't violate the terms of service.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:28 PM
16

She should be holding her sign so the person to her left can read it. They might learn something.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 06:11 PM
1

Relevance?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:28 PM
11

Really old, but worth it if new people get to see it.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:26 PM
2

It's Huff Po. Did you expect any better?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:13 PM
0

Although that ad does contain only women, and their statistics are wrong, Verizon does recognize male victims: http://aboutus.verizonwireless.com/commitment/community_programs/hopeline/
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:13 PM
35

Hopefully, he presses charges against her. 10 weeks of wrongful imprisonment is no laughing matter. Not to mention the negative publicity.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:40 PM
9

If you go in expecting the other person to pay (male or female), you're probably a jerkoff. However, if someone wants to pay, I certainly wouldn't tell them what they can and can't do with their own money.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:52 PM
5

I wouldn't take her any more seriously than these kids and their swag nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:48 PM
13

In the majority of child support payments, mistakes are made. Unfortunately, your payments are hardly rare. I have a friend who does the same, even though the child is not enrolled in daycare, and most of the money goes to the mother's shopping (while the child wears ragged hand-me-downs). During the annual review, he was told to keep his mouth shut, by the judge, when presenting incontrovertible evidence of these facts.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:14 PM
39

40 Days and 40 Nights has one of the most blatant depictions of female on male rape in modern cinema.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:10 PM
1

Same as others have said: terrible site. Near Gawker level BS. GMP was started with good intentions, but the pro-male element was forced out and is now run by feminists under the guise of a once semi-legitimate site.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:24 PM
8

You should have torn the paper in half, in front of the doctor, and gone somewhere else. Tell them you won't be getting any signature from your wife and, if they have an issue with it, you will take your business elsewhere. I'd then write my local paper.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:32 PM
17

Oh, Jezebel. Nazi Germany called, they want their writers back.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:02 PM
1

I, most certainly, support LGBT rights. I can't say that everyone in the MRM/MHRM is as supportive, since acceptance of LGBTs in soceity is relatively new, but most of the individuals I've come across are very supportive. It may never be the central concern for MRAs, but ending prejudice/hate/etc. against men will benefit all men, regardless of orientation.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:31 PM
9

That's the problem with letting shithead mods run entire forums. They can't separate their own personal bias from a community. Formally known as having one's head up their ass. It's hard to tell where the insecurity ends and ego begins.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:39 PM
8

I wouldn't think so. It may come off as protesting too much, if you know what I mean. You may also consider contacting Google regarding the site. They may be obliged to pull it from their database.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:01 PM
-3

Some MRAs maybe. A mistaken claim can be even more serious since it can be linked directly to a real crime (and evidence that a crime occurred, itself, can be damning). If the proper investigative work isn't done, not only is an innocent person sent to jail to be victimized, but the rape victim may have to live it all over again once they find the actual perpetrator (not to mention the guilt of destroying an innocent life). Furthermore, many rapists are repeat offenders, meaning it's only a matt…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:59 PM
-4

That actually is a false claim. False claims include all incorrect claims, even honest mistakes.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:40 PM
2

It's actually the study I thought it was. The very first paragraph states it's a 9 year study of a small community, not a nationwide study. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that it holds true everywhere. Certainly something to be mindful of, but it's also certainly not indicative of the larger picture.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:54 PM
2

Unfortunately, the 9 year study link is broken so I can't check it.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:28 PM
198

That site is illegal. Should it ever effect your life, you are able to sue her for damages. Before that happens, I suggest you pursue some form of legal action and have it removed due to libel and defamation.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:35 PM
18

Good for him. Especially since it sounds like he had some evidence to corroborate his account. He should sue the bastards. Of course, pieces of trash like Laura Dunn aren't interested in justice or even basic fairness.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:49 PM
7

I've seen it said to be between 8% and 50% of all rape claims. I tend to go with 25% since it's fairly reliable and reported by the FBI: "Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where results could be obtained (primarily by State and local law enforcement), the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing." (source: https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt) These are only cases with results that could be obtained, mind you. Not "h…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:57 PM
3

The policy actually applies to all adults. Not only men. You could argue for ageism, but not sexism.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:15 PM
14

Glad to see so many people call out the bullshit claim that "it never happens" regarding false claims of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:47 PM
19

To be fair, there's nothing to indicate that commenter was a feminist. Just an asshole. Granted, they're often one and the same on the internet though.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:05 PM
7

Because tits are marketable and people like to be seen donating to breast cancer charities.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:13 PM
5

Goddamn, I love their blog posts.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:07 PM
140

She's about to be very unpopular.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:08 PM
13

Having to think differently than you're told must be too much for some people. I can't imagine being so willingly brain dead.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:17 PM
5

Sodomy is both oral or anal.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:46 PM
9

It applies to all adults. Not a MR issue.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:27 PM
22

Reason # 654,893 not to be friends with a "typical feminist."
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:21 PM
0

It's adults, not men. They didn't welcome the daughter in either. They were both turned away.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 06:51 PM
2

The greatest thing about this interview, IMO, is every time the interviewer tries to turn the conversation to sexism, gender, etc.; the author has a well thought out answer and keeps the conversation sensible. Not to mention that her intent is to bring awareness to predatory females and male statutory rape victims.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:38 PM
12

Right from the start it's clear the author has no idea what sexism is.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:23 PM
-2

I enjoy his channel. He has to have some kind of personality to really stand out so he yells, is somewhat abrasive, and can be eccentric. His content is usually pretty great. However, some people can't get past the idea of having to stand out to be successful.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:44 PM
1

No problem. Glad to help.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:16 PM
4

The best way to get an answer to your question is to check out the FAQ page. It should more than answer most of your questions. Although, feel free to ask any questions you find necessary. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:14 PM
2

Reported for trolling.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:00 PM
26

In that case, his best interest should be his to determine. If you don't circumcise him at birth, he can choose to get a circumcision later. If you do circumcise him, he can't make his own decision or determine his own best interest. He's stuck with the decision you made for him, and it's a decision you can never fully understand being female.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:59 PM
46

Since the penis normally has its foreskin, maybe the question you should be asking is why should you have him circumcised? There really isn't any reason other than aesthetic (and why would you care what your son's penis looks like when you'll, hopefully, never be sexually active with it) and a few extra seconds inconvenience when cleaning it.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:27 PM
4

Yes! Glad someone caught that.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:20 PM
4

It's not rape. In fact, I haven't seen a single person here agree that trickery is rape (quite the opposite when delusional feminist types make the argument). Consent based on falsehoods is still consent. Of course, that's not to say that faking birth control shouldn't be incredibly illegal in some way.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:24 PM
15

The Huffington Post comments section - you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:55 PM
1

I don't have much of an opinion on women's reproductive issues, aside from their freedom to choose them. Abortion on the other hand is not solely a woman's issue. It also brings into questions a father's right to his child that he helped create (after all, if she keeps it, we sure as hell hold him responsible) and if a fetus has a right to life. Unfortunately, the feminist shaming bullshit seems to keep most people from considering it anything but a woman's issue, which is self-serving, dishones…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:22 PM
2

It sounds like these women just used their sex to make a case. In reality, they wanted the same benefits for nursery workers and classroom assistants as manual labor workers are getting. Seems to me that "female" and "male" really had no relevance, they were just playing a "sex card."
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:20 PM
11

They really do not. The vast majority of it is still done by hand. Even in major metropolitan areas. The hours are also long. You don't leave until your entire run is finished. It's also done primarily outdoors, in all weather. Including snow, rain, sleet, intolerable heat, and freezing cold. It is a rarity to find any city or town primarily using a lift system.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:08 PM
3

All positions bound by laws and public opinion. Not a one of these have anything to do with men being underrepresented in legal matters.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:53 PM
1

Kinda funny that the title implies that we only care about something once men are affected, but no one has cared about sexual assault in the military until women started sharing their stories. Of course, it's Marcotte. Delusional as she ever was.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:45 PM
5

Bit of an extreme false equivalency, isn't it? I think the irony here is that these girls will grow up into the hatemongers that contemporary feminism is so infected by. Remember how you were treated when you were 17 girls? Welcome to speaking up for men's issues when you're an adult.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:58 PM
5

It actually says 38% and 6% of all women and men, who are murdered, are killed by their partner. Men are murdered far more often than women in any country. 6% of all murdered men could easily be more than 38% of all murdered women.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:32 PM
4

I think that's probably due to the prevalence of lesbian feminists. I always thought the MRM was completely supportive of the LGBT community as long as they weren't anti-male. At least, I really hope we are. I would have to seriously reconsider allying myself with any group that wasn't, well, allies.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:30 PM
6

On the whole, don't we accept anyone who supports the MRM?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:46 PM
-1

Whether you have trouble accepting it or not is really of no consequence. It happens. Obviously more often than you believe (or you overestimate how often it happens to women). Physiologically, it would be more difficult to take advantage of a man when he's incapacitated due to alcohol, but that is far from any evidence that it does not happen. There have been men here who have seen women fellate an incapacitated man (or had it happen to them). I've heard similar stories from men over the years,…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:44 PM
7

If he drinks to incapacitation, yes. One should only be drinking that much with their peers. Not strangers or acquaintances. Of course, 16 is a young and stupid time and the pressure to fit or be perceived as "cool" can be strong for a lot of teens. The likelihood that teens will drink responsibly is one reason we have a minimum drinking age.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:53 PM
5

She definitely should not have put herself in that position but that doesn't make it her fault. However, 16 isn't exactly a responsible period in most people's lives. Hell, some people never figure it out.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:15 PM
1

I do so love having a balanced conversation with feminists. Their self-righteous indignation really makes their argument more convincing. /s
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:34 PM
8

It could increase false claims and also trap a lot of men into fatherhood (real or otherwise). I can't imagine any abortion ban will ever pass though.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:14 PM
3

I'm more surprised that Amanda Marcotte writes a cohesive, intelligent, and male-positive paragraph than I am by the content of Hinds' article.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:11 PM
2

Most of the time, you just have to walk away or not engage idiots. No amount of reasoning will make an individual like that less delusional, hostile, or irrational. You shouldn't even waste your time. Your time is worth more than debating with an individual like that.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:55 PM
7

"Why take such an anti-feminist stance?" Because feminism outright lies about facts. Lies that only promote it's anti-male narrative. If it was more concerned with facts, and done in a male positive way (or even male neutral), it wouldn't be an issue. We could work together, or at least side by side, but the crux of feminism is that men are causing the majority of the issues women face, or men don't have it as bad, or men this or that; which is untrue. "Do you believe that feminism can help alle…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:45 PM
1

It's just rhetoric that claims rape is normalized in the western world. Why it's considered one of the most heinous crimes one can commit, prosecuted aggressively, and its prosecution often supersedes the Constitution; I can't fathom. But, you know, oppression somehow.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:47 PM
6

I don't think a combative tone or being abrasive is a great example of how NOT to spread awareness. In CMV, the commenter must use logic and evidence to change someone's mind. One of feminism's biggest failings is that it assumes itself to be correct before a discussion starts. Similar to the way it draws conclusions, then looks for evidence. Taking that away and forcing people to justify their claims, in order to change someone's views, is not a bad thing in the slightest.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:15 PM
3

Check the paragraphs on page 9 for their guidelines.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:40 PM
3

I'll take it over delusional, naked, terrorists who aren't open to discussion.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:03 PM
7

You're perfectly right to be upset about it. Imagine a campaign that said "FSU women measure up when it comes to responsibility" regarding drinking and false rape claims. Unfortunately, I guarantee at least 90% of the people in that organization are total morons and will label you a "rape apologist" if you criticize their BS.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:42 PM
11

I think they're perfectly fine without ulterior motives (i.e. bachelorette parties as an excuse for infidelity, guy's night out to pick up women, etc.). In fact, I love having "guys night." It's healthy not to be attached to your significant other every second.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:38 PM
21

As abrasive as Paul's messages usually are, the image in question did not violate Facebook's guidelines in any possible way. Love him or hate him, the image should have remained. It's indicative of a larger problem when this doesn't surprise anyone.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:34 PM
6

I did not intend for him to use those words exactly. It is a generalized statement. He should say something, at least. Only he knows his sister well enough to know what she would listen to. Maybe "OMFG, you're, like, soooo creepy" might be what she'd need to hear. It will vary from one to the next.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:29 PM
21

You could speak up and tell her to stop being a creep. I didn't get the feeling you did though.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:34 PM
5

Awesome blog post.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:26 PM
3

Yeah, this person is a complete fucking idiot. The depth of their delusion is astounding. I really see no issue telling them to fuck off if they're just going to come in and harass you with patriarchy/misogyny derailing bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:39 PM
0

I've never really seen this behavior enough to warrant this post. Maybe it's just the time of day I'm online but I've never seen a "man, what a bitch" when it wasn't completely, 100% warranted.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:26 PM
14

Probably because there's no chance of them having a biological child with you. You know, because you exercised your reproductive freedom without their consent. The nerve.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:56 PM
12

I knew this was going to come apart when she referred to women as "the half that collectively has far less political and economic power." Instead of actually tackling it as an issue that also affects men, she just complains about 2 other articles while saying men don't have to face as much as women (including sexism and violence).
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:33 PM
2

FYI, /r/mrmemes
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:02 PM
2

This is what happens when you dilute sexual harassment so much that people can't even tell when it's actually happening to them. "I need feminism because..."
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:12 PM
2

Female characters are based on the female sensuality fantasy. If such a thing didn't exist, books like 50 Shades of Grey and shows like Sex and the City would never have become massive successes. If there is such a thing as a "male power fantasy" then the same method of "proof" could easily reveal a "female sensuality fantasy."
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:39 PM
17

Not to mention "Facebook also pledged to work to make sure the posters of such material were made to "stand behind the content they create" so that other users could hold them accountable." Basically making it policy to allow the harassment of anyone outside of the feminist hivemind.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:21 PM
5

Funny to hear this author claim anything was "a load of bullshit" as she wrote a steaming pile herself.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:25 PM
1

More senseless rhetoric based in Imaginationland.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:14 PM
11

I think they meant that they'll hold the media accountable when they don't respect women. You know, because "fuck bitches, get money" is the motto of 100% of media outlets everywhere.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:36 PM
1

You don't understand English.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:27 PM
1

Consumer. Fucking. Electronics. What part of that don't you guys get? He could have invented a black hole generator and it would have no less application to billions of consumers than a conceptual improvement to the self-driving car. It's a great improvement.... to self-driving cars. The self-driving cars that there is no market for because they don't exist commercially. The supercapacitor could be put in devices that exist, are sold to billions; across the world, tomorrow. That is why the artic…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:38 PM
2

The top winner used AI to create a model for a low cost, self driving car. He in no way created a self-driving car, nor did he originate the concept. He created a proof of concept for an improvement to a product, at least, a few decades from introduction to the market. The superconductor vastly improves upon hundreds of billions of products currently on the market, worldwide, and could be brought to market almost immediately. Again, the superconductor has a wider application and market. Therefor…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:39 PM
1

The article is about this specific technology since it has a wide variety of applications to the mainstream population. Astrophysics and a self-driving car are both great advancements, but not to the average consumer. A superconductor that allows for incredibly fast charging of mobile devices could be in billions of devices, worldwide, in the next couple years.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:21 PM
4

Not a MR related issue. It's about the technology, not the fair.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:51 PM
47

Statically, this is true. What they don't tell you is that they often don't charge women (and the NCVS definition of rape requires penetration).
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:27 PM
25

"Privilege." She keeps using that word but apparently needs a dictionary.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:59 PM
13

The movement is not concerned with women's rights. There are already countless organizations and billions of dollars pumped into women's rights. We do not need to feed into that while men's rights are routinely marginalized. On the individual level, I've never met a legitimate MRA (not a troll) who hasn't supported women's rights. That doesn't mean unlimited power and control, like so many women's rights advocates push for, but equality. Equal opportunity, not outcome; opposing forced FGM, etc.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:55 PM
0

Pushing anyone in one direction is no different than pushing them in another. People need to be able to decide for themselves. I'm not even convinced anyone is pushed one way or another. I find it more likely that people follow their parents, peers, and statistical suggestion than they've had any small part of their free will taken from them.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:44 PM
6

Most definitely. It's as if they're doing damage control because something that didn't fit their narrative made it out to the public.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:44 PM
12

It's the Huffington Post. They may as well be part of Gawker half of the time.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:38 PM
2

That's a completely legitimate criticism of what I said. I really meant it from my own perspective (and so many others I've spoken to). I didn't mean to imply it was true consistently. I know some people who bust their asses all day in a ditch and come home with a sense of accomplishment too. Confuses the hell out of me, but it's pretty awesome when someone enjoys their work.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:20 PM
9

The simple answer is check the sidebar. There are tons of great resources. The "gap" in STEM fields is nothing to be resolved. If women choose not to enter STEM fields, so be it. The hours are long and the work is thankless and unfulfilling. A lot of people don't work in STEM fields. If women want to get into STEM, there are absolutely no barriers (in fact, there are many advantages they have over men going into STEM fields). It's really time to stop thinking of every imbalance as a result of so…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:13 PM
2

It's not assuming anyone is a rapist, you're right. It's assuming all men are rapists and must be educated or else they will go with their natural tendencies and naturally learned behavior that rape is normal.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:31 PM
2

If that's their choice, good for them. I fully support it.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:06 PM
7

"Barbie has again become a tool for some to advance their own agenda." They're on to us, Patriarchy! Quick! To the OppressionMobile™!
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:45 PM
59

Look at the insecure little girls just come out of the woodwork when someone suggests that rape isn't an gendered issue. If you even suggest they can't blame all their issues on jews blacks hispanics men, it's blasphemy.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:01 PM
12

He should get it back. Engagement rings are promissory gifts. If the marriage is broken off, the ring should be returned or paid for.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:47 PM
5

It'll be an interesting (if rage inducing) debate, for sure. Physically, look at manual labor jobs and that men do them almost exclusively (construction, infantry soldier, fire fighters, etc.). Often these jobs have minimal physical requirements (and women routinely fail the minimum skills tests in the military). Mentally, look at past and present scientific advancements. Of course, no one is really superior in the workplace. Certain individuals may be more productive than others, but sex certai…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:26 PM
3

Gotcha. Since I can't review your post history, I can't even make a guess. However, the mods are usually really tolerant, but I see there have been a lot of mod changes lately. That may have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:25 PM
18

Just post this in response: http://imgur.com/WfWre0s
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:23 PM
2

That user doesn't exist. Usually, /MR doesn't ban people for anything but obvious and repeated trolling.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:35 PM
1

Ah, gotcha. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:05 PM
3

Links to subreddits with <30k subscribers must be to posts >24h old. Young accounts are given no tolerance.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:25 PM
8

I'd say write up more. It's so rarely put in a neutral light that this is refreshing. Still absolutely false, but most certainly worth reading and discussing.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:54 PM
1

Ah, there we go. Thanks for the info. I was always curious about that.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:30 PM
2

Using Norton Internet Security, I've never had any of these sites blocked nor are any of the ones listed below. Which product causes this?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:00 PM
4

"A group of men who feared the progress of feminism revived the word and used it to undercut the movement." And I suppose there's no way feminists created this faux history around the word to reduce it's legitimacy. It's kind of funny that this is exactly what feminism is doing currently when men and women have decided to address men's issues in a male positive way.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:37 PM
5

That last paragraph was masterful.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:51 PM
8

That isn't anywhere close to a synopsis of what is actually being said over there.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:32 PM
2

True, letting it go only invites the crazies to stay, but it's impossible to rule over an entire movement. However, most (all I've seen here anyway) MRAs do openly denounce the crazies and call out/downvote bullshit. We can't stop them from speaking their opinions everywhere, or even calling themselves MRAs, but we can say they are in no way representative of the movement. Since we have no powerful, influential, and political arm; NAFALT doesn't really apply. However, let's be honest. MRAs will …
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:43 PM
7

Sounds like this professor was on a power trip and wanted shit done her way or no way at all. Glad things worked out for the student though.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:30 PM
2

True, but those individuals aren't numerous. They're certainly a cancer on a really solid idea and movement, but they haven't managed to completely corrupt the MHRM. Unchecked, they will, sure; but they haven't yet. That, I think, is a massive difference between the MHRM and feminism. Feminism needs to be torn apart and reassembled in a way that reflects reality due to irreparable corruption. The MHRM hasn't, as a whole, hasn't gotten to that point. Although, at present, even if it did; it would…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:19 PM
12

Feminism is one of those things that looks good on paper. When you get into its practice (mostly dealing with it's proponents), things can go to hell quickly. I feel lucky that the MHRM hasn't grown into some grotesque, Akira-like, abomination the way I feel feminism, as a whole, has. It's exactly like religion. Lots of really great ideas, morals, lessons; put to paper. Then humans get involved and foul it up and start killing one another.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:08 PM
2

"Discretion is the better part of valor." Always choose your fights wisely. You were hopelessly outnumbered and speaking up would have made no difference to this tiny, petty individual. You also aren't your gender, so you can't apologize for them. You're one woman, and a great one at that. Thank you for sharing, and don't beat yourself up over it.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:34 PM
2

Dang. I'm glad you had the ability to withstand that sort of barrage, especially after such a trying event. Thanks for taking the time to do this AMA.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:57 PM
1

How did the police handle two men? Are/Were there mandatory arrest policies in the area, in which, it occurred?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:52 PM
6

You don't find it interesting as much as you, incorrectly, believe them to be exclusive. You're under the impression that one must be correct and the other must be wrong. In truth, both views could be wrong. Being painfully aware of feminism's shortcomings, and stating such, does not imply a lack of reflection on my own belief. I'd say I find such absurd "reasoning" interesting, but I don't. I've come to expect it.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:31 PM
19

I think it's a perfectly healthy question that more people ought to ask themselves, and you won't have an answer immediately if you're being honest. We used to call it soul searching. Now, society at large is too arrogant, complacent, and apathetic to question themselves. People can't even challenge their beliefs within themselves to see the issues with more clarity. It's why there are so few mainstream egalitarian feminists. Contemporary social justice is blind. Willingly. Its proponents refuse…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:06 PM
13

Nicely explained. Comically, I guess we could say "Matriarchy hurts women too."
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:50 PM
22

Sometimes I think these women are under the assumption that men, all men, group think as much as themselves.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:46 PM
5

It's an interesting discussion but fatally flawed from the start with the inclusion of patriarchy. No concept that rigidly excludes possibilities can ever be taken seriously. It's just a narrowly defined, self-serving, bunch of nonsense to perpetuate an agenda.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:47 PM
5

Very true. I just think people should be free to make their own decisions. Even if they are poor ones. Sometimes we don't give kids enough credit though. They can be smart as often as they can be stupid, and there are an increasing number of teenage boys and girls noticing the hypocrisy of feminism and the need to address issues men and boys face. I would almost say we ought to stay the course because the anti-male attitudes that permeate almost every facet of contemporary feminism reaches a wid…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:25 PM
3

Their beliefs do not constitute fact. So much bullshit it's hard to even know where to start.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:12 PM
21

Luckily, it's completely optional so I don't see much of a problem. It allows someone to choose to take it or not. By high school, these kids are already making decisions that effect their futures and are nearly full legal adults. I don't see a problem with letting them choose parts of their education. Especially, if it shows them the contradictory and hypocritical nature of contemporary feminism. It's up to the kids to be smart enough to see a con-person when they see one.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:36 PM
1

Ah, gotcha. Thanks. I didn't see that.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:45 PM
2

Relevance?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:42 PM
95

The title of the article should be "We Were Protesting a Men's Rights Lecture in Toronto and Threw Together This Bullshit."
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:46 PM
83

Oh how I hope that young woman enters politics. We could use a few rational people there.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:05 PM
3

The fastest way to get ignored is to adopt a set of beliefs that half, or more, of the population doesn't agree with and has nothing to do with our cause. You would effectively half our possible supporters and lose many of the ones we already have. I can already see it "Man, those MRAs have some decent points but they don't think gays should be able to get married, so fuck them." "Men are committing suicide at alarming rates? I guess they should stop opposing gun laws!" etc. Considering that con…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:34 PM
2

Because of all the stupid, laughable things they do on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:19 PM
8

No, we should not entrench ourselves in a party. Political parties encompass more than just a single cause. The fastest way to completely destroy this movement would be to side with a party.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:06 PM
6

Both do need to improve, but only one needs to be removed from the influential positions in society (and the other doesn't even have a voice there).
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:48 PM
6

She kinda goes on tangents throughout but, overall, it's a really great article giving a truthful look from the inside. Not just someone reading a narrative and making judgements from the outside.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:41 PM
6

That person needs professional help. They sound irrationally and destructively paranoid, possibly even psychotic.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:35 PM
7

I loled because it's 100% true, but I don't think it is really relevant to this sub.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:37 PM
13

Looks like that graph can change depending on how you rank the topics (on the right). Would be interesting to play with though.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:14 PM
44

It is a logic fail, but it's not indicative of your entire gender. Some of the people I like most in this world are female and nowhere near this daft.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:40 PM
3

Most definitely, but I said "mother" not "person."
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:38 PM
9

It's interesting to see what people find when they step out of their protective bubble. At least this was a caring and wonderful mother, instead of some hardline feminist bigot.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:17 PM
14

Creepiest. article. ever.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:15 PM
13

I think having our own version would be a great idea, but not solely as a reactionary site meant to illicit a response from them. Having a quick and easy site like that might be beneficial to show the types of things men do face.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:29 PM
15

They don't publish men's stories on the site. You can submit them, but they won't make it in.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:04 PM
-20

The women are where they have always been throughout history during crisis: behind the men.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 12:51 PM
1

No opinion, and we shouldn't have one. This subreddit is about men's rights. Not about religion. There may be aspects here and there that we discuss, like any other topic, but that is hardly a view on Islam as a whole.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:32 PM
1

Overview of Mod Policy: No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 02:16 PM
3

Came in just to propose the same question as the person below. Are men catching up or are women falling behind? One should have them concerned. The other just further proves many of the things posted here daily.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:58 PM
3

Oh, most certainly, but none of that helps him now. The best case scenario is that he gets help however he can or he may not be alive long enough to make a difference. After he's healthy, he can worry about equality. Worrying if it was advertized enough is a luxury for us healthy, internet spectators.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:16 PM
14

I meant "best case" in terms of his health, not social justice.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:44 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:28 PM
1

Why not start it yourself? Tumblr is a free service, isn't it? With all the stuff that passes through here on a daily basis, you would have unlimited content. I'm not sure if you'd need more than 1 person running it anyway.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:16 PM
47

Go anyway. Worst case: record which places turn you away for your sex and write about it. Publicize the shit out of it and tell anyone who will listen. Mediocre case: they can direct you to someone who will take you (still, write about it - it's bullshit). Best case: they do take men, they just don't publicize it. Inform them that you've been waiting to get the care you need (and almost didn't) because they don't explicitly state that men can be treated too.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:08 PM
0

The original article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2151921/Revealed-Tear-streaked-mug-shot-Ultimate-Fighting-Championship-ring-girl-jailed-kicking-boyfriend-nose.html#ixzz1wLVGVwyt
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:19 PM
5

So it's another woman telling men the proper way to be men through masculinity shaming? I'd wager she was also one of the people so against people without vaginas making any law that was even tangentially connected with vaginas.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:13 PM
0

The entire concept of patriarchy stems from hate.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:31 PM
0

I would have asked when complaining started being considered work. She shouldn't dish it out if she can't take it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:46 PM
4

You can delete your posts. Should stop those notifications. The hate mail will eventually stop, just don't respond.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:14 PM
1

http://www.snopes.com/crime/prevent/rape.asp Just copy and paste that in the comments.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:47 PM
0

You have to remember the tradition was steeped in the fact that men bore all the legal and financial responsibilities of this wife's actions (which is more utter bullshit than changing one's name). So, there's more than just bullshit to it's history, but it's pointless in modern society. Although society has given him an unfair expectation of marriage, it's not up to you to conform to his expectations any more than he needs to conform to yours (that second bit is extremely important). If you two…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:41 PM
2

If they cut off women's clits and gay men are routinely killed, then women need to shut up and stop complaining because someone has it worse, right? There is never a "worse." There's only "you both got the short end of the stick."
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:29 PM
14

VAWA is a pretty big one, and recent. For all of the talk of it being gender neutral, it certainly hasn't proven to be. It needs reformed, and reform isn't always a bad thing. Nearly a third of the failed economic reform funds being diverted from infrastructure, for being male dominated, and put into industries, that actually grew in the recession, because they're female dominated. That is a pretty far reaching one. Wage gap myth is another. As is the concept of a patriarchy and rape culture. Th…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:26 PM
-1

Obstacle? Self-fulfilling prophecy? True? All yes. It's an observation, not my design.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:07 PM
13

"While some threads have certainly sparked my anger, more often I find that there is some valuable insight." I think that's exactly how most of us feel here regarding feminism. There is valuable insight to be had. There's also a lot of "that is fucking bullshit!" to be had. We do have a sort of meme here though: NAFALT (not all feminists are like that). It's true that most feminists don't hate men, we all openly admit that, but the politically powerful and most vocal arm of feminism is, at the v…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:00 PM
5

I really don't have a preference on issues. I think they're all important. The thing that holds us back? Being anti-feminist. However, it's also feminism that consistently stifles us (making it impossible for us not to be anti-feminist while still pursuing equality). Even conversations amongst ourselves, talking about our own problems, are a problem for many feminists. When this subreddit is updated tonight, after the protests in Canada, it'll be clearer than ever.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:55 PM
-1

Being reformed is a farce. Even though the legal system treats people as if they can be reformed, and sometimes people can, they're never accepted back into society. Their life is defined by their crime from that point. They will forever be treated as a criminal. They're almost better off in prison. Child sex offenders, murderers, rapists; none of them will get a fair chance once they're out. I often theorize that is why so many child sex criminals are multiple offenders. If you treat someone li…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:51 PM
2

Gonna have to disagree. Why it is done is of no consequence. That it is done is the issue. If you woke up tomorrow without your arms, are you going to question why or lament the loss of your limbs? Why it is done doesn't matter. It all should stop, and if conversations about FGM is the only place men and women can address MGM, then maybe more people (like Anne Rice) need to get their heads out of their asses and deal with the issue as a whole instead of only the side they feel like dealing with.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:09 PM
-7

Morons. Morons everywhere. http://i.qkme.me/36idb0.jpg
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:05 PM
24

In that case, she deserved an indefinite prison sentence. Thanks for the information too.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:57 PM
20

She deserved nothing less than the death penalty. Plain and simple. As a tangential question, for my Northern neighbors, does Canada practice the death penalty?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:47 PM
6

“Judging from his recent speculations on the legality of rape, it would appear that Professor Landsburg’s ‘thought experiments’ are becoming more and more aggressively offensive.” So, basically they're saying "STOP THINKING! IT'S OFFENSIVE!" No surprise. Thought experiments on controversial topics are necessary and not offensive what-so-ever. These women need to get their shit together. They are everything wrong with "higher" education.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:45 PM
6

Dammit, bot! I specifically did that to NOT link them. Wait. Why am I talking to a bot?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:09 PM
1

I'm pretty sure you can't. It's similar to running your own forum. They get absolute control, you can shut up and take it or leave. I think that's why r/feminisms started. It wasn't radical enough and people started leaving to form their own subreddit when they realized they couldn't take r/feminism over.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:51 PM
44

Welcome to the system you created, ladies. Now help abolish it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:49 PM
5

I'm sure it'll be "men getting themselves killed" too. Not the female soldier's ineptitude.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:24 PM
8

It happens to the best of us. There are always delusional assholes that blindly hate on, well, anything. Pick something. I promise you someone hates it. In fact, it's probably rule 33. We just don't talk about it. Love your name, btw.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:20 PM
1

You have to read the original context. He is doing drugs with someone specifically to lower her inhibitions in hopes of having sex with her. Not a girlfriend or a hook up that is totally into it beforehand. He just wants to use drugs to make his chances better.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:10 PM
1

Most certainly. No one should be subservient to anyone, for any reason.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:02 PM
4

I totally agree, but men were never treated like princes. They were treated like workhorses that didn't have to do all of the work.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:56 PM
8

Let's hope that never happens. Fingers crossed.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:54 PM
4

Well, that certainly wouldn't be rape. It's a scummy thing to do, but certainly not rape if she makes the decision to do it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:54 PM
2

Uh, yeah. No one disagrees with "Drugging someone to lower their inhibitions for sex is rape."
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:49 PM
11

Why would we celebrate women failing?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:45 PM
2

No need for it. I am, admittedly, abrasive. I certainly took no offense. For my part in antagonizing you, I also apologize. The impersonal nature of the internet often makes that too easy.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:31 PM
9

Glad to see so many people call her out for her BS. FGM does deserve discussion, but MGM is, not only practiced, but embraced by first world cultures. When people embrace something like that, it takes precedent.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:29 PM
8

There's a rather humorous entry on him in the Encyclopedia Dramatica: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Dick_Masterson He's a master troll, apparently. edit: also, that sponsored link is over a year old (check the comments). Not sure how it's showing up in r/MR today.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:05 PM
2

Abortion is only a women's rights issue as a secondary priority. First and foremost, it's an issue about right to life, murder, and when life begins. Women do not have the monopoly on those.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:31 PM
2

I actually have to run out for the rest of the day, but it's been an interesting conversation. I will most certainly be thinking about it. Thanks for keeping it civil. That's a rarity now a days.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:53 PM
1

I actually have to run out for the day, but it's been an interesting conversation. Something I will most certainly be thinking about. Thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:52 PM
13

Don't all adopted children feel that way? Why do we let women give up their children then?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:51 PM
8

Probably no worse than hearing "he's a deadbeat dad" for the next 18 years, when any child is given up for adoption by the mother, or even when the father's just not around but still financially supportive.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:47 PM
1

There are, literally, hundreds of internet videos of someone violently defending themselves or someone else and they are hailed a hero, even when it's excessive. I see your point, but it's no reason to sacrifice your safety or life. I tend to use "ass kick" rather liberally, I've been told (this really isn't the first time). Often it's used to refer to an excessively violent beating. I've always meant it to be a one-sided fight where someone is clearly outclassed. It's never a beating that teach…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:44 PM
1

And when you are surrounded by dozens of militant supports who want nothing more than to see you, possibly, dead? What happens when running is not an option? I'm not talking about a 90 lb. women's studies major throwing a fit. What happens when it's a 200 lb. man? Someone with a weapon? How about 2 people? 4 or 5? What happens when a group of 20 decides you're rape apologizing, scum? A genetic defect and should be exterminated. When I hear "radical," "militant," and with the intent to "physicall…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:34 PM
2

I thought that was when you put passion before principle (just referencing the Karate Kid Part II).
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:57 PM
15

Fantastic news. Really great of them to publicly recognize men do face sexual assault and actually do something with that knowledge.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:45 PM
3

I can't see how the obituary would be sexist. Just poorly written. She had contributed great things to science. Something most definitely worth mentioning.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:32 PM
1

That is a completely warranted and fair concern, but do we value individual men less than our reputation? It seems like the very antithesis of what the MRM stands for.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:24 PM
1

Don't worry, I won't be there. I am many thousands of miles away from Canada. Still, you would value a man's safety less than a reputation? It seems counter-productive.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:23 PM
2

Often it is, yes, but I can also respect the immovable object. Sometimes you have to plant yourself and make the world move around you. Maybe it's a mixture of pride and stupidity, but to stand up for what you believe in, not just move when pushed, is a powerful message. Most likely, yes, they will be trying to provoke. However, there are a myriad of situations that can arise so it's impossible to analyze them all. If someone throws something at you, move. If someone throws a punch at you, move …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:21 PM
1

I have no doubt that you are able, but you shouldn't have to unless you choose to. I certainly respect passivism if you choose it, but it should not be mandatory in matters of self-defense. And only self-defense, never aggression.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:55 PM
1

No doubt, but I value personal safety over news coverage. I do value a person's right to health and safety too though (even an attacker). I can't stress enough that I'm not condoning gratuitous violence. Only the absolute minimum needed to ensure your safety.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:42 PM
1

I agree. The least amount of force necessary to maintain your safety is all one should need (but that does vary by training, strength, etc.). Sometimes that's just a simple matter of moving, other times you may need to push them away or restrain them. Luckily, there should be law enforcement at the event so any altercation should be short lived. edit: spelling
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:37 PM
1

Of course, but I mean in terms of practicality here, if someone is wrongfully assaulting you physically, are you going to focus on how it might look or focus on protecting yourself? I, for one, will always put safety above appearances. After that, all you can do is cooperate, speak the truth, and (hopefully) present evidence you were in the right. I would never presume to represent an entire movement, but I would also never passively allow someone to beat on me for the movement's benefit.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:34 PM
1

Best of luck. I do hope it all goes well. Unfortunately, I'm a few thousand miles away, but you all will be in my thoughts.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:55 PM
1

Not sure if English is your first language.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:41 PM
3

Oh, of course. I don't mean to imply aggression. I've been a martial artist for a couple decades now. I simply would not make the decision to meet physical assault (when someone actually puts their hands on you) with passivism. I admire those that do, but I don't feel as if I need to severely injure someone to kick their ass. I mean to meet physical violence with the least amount of force necessary to defend one's self. Unless it gets physical, you never resort to violence. Ever. Sometimes, it s…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:39 PM
2

Fair enough, but that attitude is one thing that keeps many MRAs confined to the internet.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:37 PM
-1

And if they want to provoke that with a punch in the face, I will take whatever measures necessary to protect myself. You are more than welcome to stand there and take an ass beating to make a political or social statement. I think it's admirable when some people do, but it's not my way. I would neither engage in gratuitous violence nor gratuitous passivism. Appearances be damned.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:33 PM
2

Maybe you'd take an ass beating to look good. I wouldn't. I'm not talking about when protesters yell at you. I'm talking about physical assault ("physically challenging" someone could mean a lot of things). If someone gets physically violent with you, take steps to protect yourself. You don't need to hospitalize them, but you shouldn't have to take physical violence simply because it might be twisted later to make you look like the bad guy.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:25 PM
2

I'm really not interested in "looking good" for you. When they say "physically challenging" MRAs, I take that as anything from yelling at them (which is easy to walk away from), to punching them in the face (which no one should have to tolerate if law enforcement doesn't step in). You're misrepresenting what I actually am saying, which is that no one should have to sit and take someone physically assaulting them (which is when they actually put their hands on you) simply to look like the good gu…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:22 PM
12

Arale is a public figure. A vice president for an organization. With that comes a higher level personal accountability for one's words and actions. Scum girl was just being a complete bitch, but also a private citizen.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:07 PM
12

That is true, but she also was not a public figure as far as we know. Arale is the vice president of an organization that is openly, and proudly, protesting men's right to even discuss issues that affect them. With that office comes personal accountability. You're totally right about being held to the same standard as men though. A man that did that would have been routinely shamed into the ground.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:06 PM
10

Then that's where we'd have a differing opinion. I wouldn't stand idly by while being physically assaulted. I'd take the most minimal action possible in order to cease it. From walking away to defensive violence. You don't need to hospitalize someone, but you also don't need to passively take an assault so you can be a social justice martyr.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:03 PM
23

Guled Arale is already a public figure who has no intent to be anonymous.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:30 PM
14

I'm not talking about indiscriminately kicking asses, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with self-defense when someone assaults you. Even if they are radical and militant feminists.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:21 PM
12

I would LOVE for these kids to "physically challenge" me. As much as I am against violence, there is merit to the idea that some people just need their ass kicked one good time to learn respect for others.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:13 PM
8

Interesting data. Thanks for taking the time to pull all this together. Have you thought of checking out /r/feminisms? Apparently, it's for the "real feminists" because /r/feminism is run by MRAs (apparently people actually believe that).
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:27 PM
17

From what I remember, the boy's mother refused to press any charges. 2 years old and we're just now really hearing about it. I can only imagine how quickly it would have exploded if 3 boys held down an 11 year old girl and kept lifting her dress and pulling her tights down while putting their knee on her throat.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:19 PM
0

Exactly. Semantics are pointless when the result is the same. The diagnosis for ADHD is going to get looser this year too so expect a jump in children diagnosed with it.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:46 PM
5

Attack requires some form of intended harm. It's an unintended consequence of such a bullshit definition of ADHD. It's too broad and general, which results in misdiagnoses.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:31 PM
7

Attack? No. Poor diagnosis? Absolutely. It's just that the supposed symptoms of ADHD are typically more common in boys than girls.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:21 PM
4

Really great piece.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:28 PM
3

Not really anything to do with feminism, but yes; it needs addressing.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:34 PM
2

I don't really see an issue with focusing on how modern sexism affects young women (other than the self-serving bit). MRAs really should be trying to start public conversations like this with a focus on boys because it's certainly the underrepresented sex. Is it unfair when Warren Farrell doesn't use half his lecture time to discuss females? I certainly don't think so.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:14 PM
1

This is not a Men's Rights subreddit problem, it's an internet problem. The lazy, cheap shots get the most recognition. You've completely overlooked that fact. That said, it would be nice to spread knowledge of organizations, activism, etc. but it's also important to provide a place for men to air their grievances. Chances are, they don't have anywhere else they can speak openly about these issues.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:05 PM
4

"We, as citizens and human beings, have a moral duty to refuse to participate in this cynical game." Truth.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 01:53 PM
2

Then that person is a moron. Plain and simple. They've defined things in such a way to maker their argument correct. It's no less absurd to say "blacks can't face racism because racism is white + love of mayonnaise." The problem with social science is that it isn't concrete so there's no way to prove -isms are power + prejudice or they aren't. You just need to convince enough people that they are.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:38 PM
11

"So much for men not being allowed to complain." Hey guys! One person was welcomed to speak up about their experience and had a positive experience. The double standard is over for all men everywhere. We can stop bitching because, as we all know; if one man makes it, we all have. Your experience is not representative of everyone's. Furthermore, your subjective views of men's rights may not be everyone else's. For all I know, you're a total fuckoff and deserved every downvote you got. Pointing ou…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:39 PM
7

1) the majority does support gay marriage (somewhere around 60% or higher) 2) we do not allow citizens to decide civil rights issues, especially ones based on bias or bigotry 3) men and women should be able to have multiple spouses 4) there's a reason we don't let siblings marry - severely disabled children Both of the above are also false equivalencies.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:05 PM
5

Legitimate arguments? No.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:30 PM
14

I talk about it when it comes up, but don't make it a point to go out of my way and subject everyone to my morality, regardless of how correct I find it. For instance, I made a remark about a male character in some game/show/movie possibly being raped by a female. A female friend said that men couldn't be raped because erections meant they wanted it. Perfect time to bring it up.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:41 PM
4

I was pretty certain we do consider GBT men our allies, but I see 55 downvotes which is disheartening. Regardless, I always have and always will consider them my ally and be one to them.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:31 PM
50

Talking about issues men face, even on the individual level, is not playing victims. The biggest hurdle men's rights faces is that no one thinks men have a right to complain. Bringing stories to light by linking them and sharing them with those people (while discussing them within the community), is a framework for action. The first step is to break the cycle of denial by society at large. Sadly, without millions of supporters, you can't make a change. Showing concrete examples of men's issues, …
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:57 PM
4

I missed it. Seems like he was more touched by the story than the law. The law is a piece of garbage and desperately needs reform.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:45 PM
8

ex-girlfriend* You should fix that for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:04 PM
6

The wage gap myth always seems to be a good debate topic.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:03 PM
3

Good that you ended it, but that was rather lacking compassion. Of course, she shouldn't have put you through all that bullshit to begin with so I understand your reasons.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:46 PM
2

No one was asking her to stay silent. In fact, most people seem to think she should have politely stated that she was offended instead of snapping a picture and posting it with a one-sided, inaccurate account of what happened. Had she handled it like an adult, everything would have been fine. Instead, she acted like a child. She got what she deserved after dragging her employer into her petty business that ended up creating massive hardship for a individual. I'd say I hope she learns from this, …
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:47 PM
3

Self-righteousness that followed? Did he miss the entire beginning?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:17 PM
2

As far as I know, there is nothing you can do but watch what you send people next time.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:27 PM
35

Probably in response to the recent de-funding of the NIKK after simple research debunked it's "scientific" claims. http://www.menshealthaustralia.net/content/nordic-countries-defund-gender-ideology.html
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:25 PM
1

Since lengthy trials re-victimize survivors due to evidence standards, we should obviously just throw out trials with no physical evidence or that are more than 48 hours old. Maybe all trials that aren't entered with a guilty plea should be ruled not guilty. That would most certainly shorted the re-victimization period. This would be no less unjust than removing rights of the accused in attempts to hasten a trial to avoid re-victimization. It just points the proverbial gun in the other direction…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:53 PM
9

1978 survey published by feminists. No way this could be BS. http://www.fearus.org/
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:47 PM
17

You should have a right to legal surrender, but not everything is fair 100% of the time. One day the world might get with the times, but it's not today. The only thing you can do is be really careful about birth control. Your own. Never rely on someone else's to be fool proof.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:13 PM
10

I completely agree with you. I think Adria herself reinforced the idea that women can be unreasonably bitchy, but the reaction from the community really impressed me. I feel like moving into the tech sector, as I am now, is going to be more pleasant than I initially thought.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:10 PM
2

Relevance?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:24 PM
5

Considering what she was tweeting during the conference, she was just being a hypocritical, petty bitch (as in someone unpleasant, not a female....for those lurkers). There's no other way to describe it.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:34 PM
5

You want to make a public spectacle, don't be surprised if it doesn't go the way you want and you have to face the consequences. She got what she deserved. End of story.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:20 PM
1

She tweeted/blogged a picture of 2 guys who candidly told a mildly off-color joke about "forks" and "dongles" which resulted in one of them being fired. The internet basically told her to go to hell and SendGrid got a lot of negative feedback, so they had to let her go.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:15 PM
4

She sounds like a real prize.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:12 PM
18

They should decapitate this woman in hopes that women will take a lesson from it. Sarcasm, of course, but no less ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:45 PM
5

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:42 PM
1

We have one: Webster's. Because we're not children. We say what we mean.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:02 PM
0

I saw this bit of crap too. Immediately called it out for what it is: a bunch of shitty opportunists trying to use a tragic event to further their own agenda.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:48 PM
5

You can pretty much ignore anyone that subscribes to the patriarchy myth. It certainly weeds out a lot of stupid that exists on the internet.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:00 PM
8

You can't stop them completely, only deter them. However, I also have to call BS on there being no solutions offered. They're offered just about every time we discuss false accusations. Anonymity, punishing malicious false accusers with criminal charges, returning presumption of innocence to the accused, overturning the Dear Colleague standards, recognizing that sex can be a confusing mess of awkward interactions resulting in an outward consent with an internal rejection, ending victim blaming f…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:56 PM
2

I don't really find it sexist. Inaccurate, but not sexist.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:03 PM
29

The only MR issue was their identity not being shielded should they have been innocent. Now that it's over and they're guilty, it's not an MR issue. Thus, doesn't belong here. I don't really see the need to grab pitchforks just to appease feminists.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:18 PM
5

We shouldn't have known anyone's names until there was a verdict, and anyone who revealed those names should have faced some form of charge. Now that it's over, names being released is fine, but we don't need to know the victim's name. Same if the guys were innocent. We wouldn't need to know the victim's name (of course, they would have been the victims then).
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:37 PM
2

We had this discussion yesterday. What he means is the analogy of "a woman being vigilant about rape is the same as a man being vigilant in a bad neighborhood." assumes that women have to be vigilant at all times in society, thus perpetuating the rape culture myth. A better analogy is women must be as vigilant of avoiding rape as a man must be of random violence. Men are far and above more likely to be the target of random violence than a woman is to be raped, but we do not let it control our li…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:16 PM
3

Agreed with AeneaLamia. This is unfortunate but not a men's rights issue. I'd rather the subreddit stay focused on it's intent than accept content like this. "This man is guilty while innocents are convicted" isn't at all related to the topic.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:56 PM
4

If they did it, they deserve to be in jail, but they need to get their fair trial just like anyone else should get. I hope they get to the bottom of it though.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:21 PM
4

Read #1. Stopped reading. Already nonsense considering the gender pay gap myth is just a myth.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:19 PM
5

Transparency of actual information often does. Transparency of speculation does not.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:36 PM
8

That's exactly the problem. You can't legislate morality, but you can legislate what information is released. It's not of any public interest until guilt is established anyway. It really doesn't have any business being public until such a time that someone is guilty and that information is useful dictating social interactions with that person. Until then, it's another anonymous innocent citizen no one would otherwise have any knowledge of, and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:08 PM
16

Nope. 100% against it until they are found guilty. There are simply too many negatives that are too far reaching.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:41 PM
10

I know this is a radical concept to most people in today's society, but maybe you're wrong and you're not arguing for equality at all. Radical feminists say they are arguing for equality when they suggest eradication of the male half of the human race too. Or maybe the people responding are wrong. Most likely, you and them just have different opinions (in a community of over 60000, that's bound to happen). Sounds like you're too defensive, easily agitated, and argumentative. Especially for the i…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:34 PM
23

You aren't missing anything. Next time you're in class, ask questions and point out the double standard. Ask if a man and woman were both drunk. Or just the man. Is it still rape?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:01 PM
5

A single day of actually posting, no one agrees with a couple posts, and you throw a tantrum and quit? Your devotion to equality is astounding.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:59 PM
0

I see what you mean and I agree. To be honest, it took me several re-reads to get that from your initial post though. I think some readers may simply be confused as to what you're saying.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:32 PM
2

Kinda surprised this didn't get more upvotes. I can only assume it was posted late Monday night. Someone should resubmit it during the prime hours. If there are no objections by the mods, of course.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:30 PM
9

You're saying that women shouldn't have to be vigilant all the time while a rich man would only have to be vigilant some of the time. Which makes sense, however they're two different situations and most rape doesn't happen that way. It's only the ridiculous notion of rape culture and rape hysteria that forces women into that mindset of having to be vigilant all the time. What MRAs, at least, should be saying is a man is more likely to be the target of random violence than a woman is to be raped.…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:10 PM
2

TBH, I don't see objectification in games. Just stylized over-exaggeration. The feminerds do need to stop inventing things to be upset about though. As long as men are portrayed in an equal light (which they are), there's no reason to complain. Especially when games clearly are not representative of reality.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:40 PM
3

It's just a double standard. Something either men shouldn't have to put up with or women need to be just as chastised for. It's what some people call the "feminine imperative." Women tend to define morality in a way that suits them because too many men stay silent and let them (not because they need a man's approval, but because men also live in the same culture). Either they don't care or men aren't allowed to be offended by such things. Combined, that's a majority of men and too few women spea…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:06 PM
1

I say that stuff anyway and tell anyone with a problem with it to kiss my ass. I know what I like. I'm not going to eat shit wishing it was prime rib because someone has a problem with my preferences.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:52 PM
1

Google suggestions now reality! Although men shouldn't drink soy milk (probably not great for women in large amounts either). It elevates the body's estrogen level. Stick to almond milk instead.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:29 PM
16

Where in the hell are these women hearing these things? Are they themselves flooding the streets and forums asking rape victims what they were wearing, etc.? It's not happening anywhere but their imaginations from what I see. I live in the same culture as most of these white, suburban, college educated, privileged feminists; yet, I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to support these claims of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:13 PM
22

Sounds an awful lot like they're projecting their own negative behavior.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:41 PM
3

Next up: men breathing are stealing air from women. Thus, oppressing them.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:09 PM
1

Generalizing all individuals like that is exactly what a legitimate movement should NOT be doing.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:48 PM
11

Yeah, that is moronic. How about "Rape Culture: The day men start acting the way you treat them."
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:29 PM
27

Yeah. Wong's article wasn't very good. Luke McKinney is pretty terrible too. However, Dave Easton gave us this little gem: http://www.cracked.com/article_18760_6-things-everyone-knows-about-women-that-arent-true.html
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:49 PM
3

Meh. Opinions, opinions everywhere. Unfortunately, like feminism, the author has adopted the notion that his particular brand of Men's Rights is the one true and correct brand. Reddit is a buncha libruls. Hurr durr. Fart. Not interested.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:38 PM
3

It would obviously be false since we know women do not make such a small fraction of what men make. It's explicitly illegal. What the author means to say is "The Worst-Paying Cities for Female Dominated Industries." Which is probably due to high demand in technical fields and fields demanding manual labor. Get a hard hat and a shovel, ladies. There are plenty of great paying manual labor jobs. They're tough, but they pay decently enough. We should be encouraging women to pick up trades as much, …
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:44 PM
43

As far as I'm concerned, men have every right to kick women out of their restroom. I have to piss. I don't want some random skank looking at my junk. I also don't want to see them using the toilet. The answer? GTFO. Seems pretty simple to me. It sucks that they have a line, but that's partially due to their biology and partially due to socialized behavior. None of which is my fault.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:12 PM
4

Pretty much how I live every day, with one minor difference: I don't tell others they need to live their life my way.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:09 PM
24

Interesting how delusional they are believing the facts (provable facts, even) to be inaccurate. I have no doubt they actually believe that, which is what makes them so willingly ignorant.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:14 PM
20

It's a nice sentiment he did for his kid, but nothing newsworthy.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:24 PM
3

Downvoted for trolling. That's why you're getting downvoted, and rightfully so.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:40 PM
7

Kinda interesting that someone who lived a year in Japan manages to completely misread the culture. I guess that's what happens when you try to learn about the culture through clip art. Completely valid criticism of Sarkessian's "work" though.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:21 PM
5

Glad to see some of the most insane, out of touch feminists in the spotlight while none of their masses call her out on her bullshit. Business as usual.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:01 PM
14

Sure would be nice if men had the luxury of telling the opposite sex not to define, regulate, and legislate their lives. Must be men oppressing themselves again.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:56 PM
6

I think it's kinda funny, and kind of sad, that instead of being featured and enjoying it; coming in and actually discussing some legitimate issues, it's descended into Oppression Olympics already. OP needs to learn about privilege and oppression, there's male mods on r/feminism, OP can't understand what they're saying because he's privileged, etc. It's like a train wreck though. Can't look away.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:14 PM
3

Ah, thank you. I shouldn't be reading so early in the morning.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:29 PM
10

If /r/feminism wasn't really /r/feminazi I'd support it, but I'm sure as fuck not going to go in there and start harassing people in the same fashion they come here and start shit. People have every right to be uneducated asshats without harassment. They just shouldn't be making decisions and laws for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:12 PM
12

So they drug him through bullshit for a year because they're fearful bigots? I can't imagine this becoming more common as feminism's fear-mongering extends it's reach to combat equal rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:17 PM
7

I see it fine without any subscription.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:16 PM
1

What is this "again?" Kick her to the curb.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:42 PM
6

The answer you're likely to get: "Patriarchy."
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:32 PM
4

Naturally. Just a heads up in case of downvotes or the typical "WTF is wrong with you? This is old and was just posted!"
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:02 PM
7

I hate to be that guy, but this was posted an hour ago.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:23 PM
3

I looked into freezing some and it gets a little pricey. Not as much as a kid, but more than I have lying around currently.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:47 PM
27

Quite possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Glad they don't require it anymore. If it weren't for PVPS, and the possibility of changing my mind down the road, I'd be getting one myself.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:15 PM
28

What if 1 in 1 comments on Facebook, regarding rape, quoted completely made up and unfounded statistics? BULLSHIT CULTURE EXISTS. DO NOT LET IT.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:12 PM
55

Nice to see some parts of the world making steps to get with this whole equality thing. Although my hopes for the States remain low since we're still on a witch hunt for rapists.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:13 PM
6

Looked at the icon in the corner, saw "Trigger Warning" was the first sentence, closed the window. Waste of my time.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:21 PM
2

It places them in a superior position to argue for their privilege, that's all. Just a silencing tactic. I always counter with gay men have always, and still, have it infinitely worse than any woman. It's irrefutable. From that point, if they wish to discuss their woes, they have no choice but to acknowledge the issues faced by others.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:16 PM
0

That wasn't due to his guilt. That was holding before his trial. They don't release you on bonds after you're found guilty. Regardless, not all sexual assault cases result in jail time, a lot do, but not all (and especially not women's cases).
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:17 PM
5

http://herald-review.com/news/local/man-gets-two-years-probation-in-sexual-abuse-plea-agreement/article_b17be9ac-2ba1-11e1-9fb2-0019bb2963f4.html It's far less common than with female rapists, but it does happen. What the female teacher got is common, not counting the jail sentence.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:26 PM
26

Yes, you were harassing him because you don't want him covering a subject of interest to MRAs. Covering a subject and "sending in the goons" are two completely different things. You seem to be confused about your own actions.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:20 PM
9

I'm just happy she got what she got. Not all sexual assault of minors result in jail time even for men, but what she got seems pretty standard in any case.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:30 PM
-2

Neat. Thanks for the info!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:26 PM
47

You mean he didn't let you harass him in private.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:16 PM
32

Really not helping your case.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:53 PM
3

Occasionally, it's nice to not have someone pull a punch. Kudos to Dr. Helen. It's important to study these things appropriately and present them in a objective fashion, but sometimes it's just as important to step back and ask "what the fuck is wrong with you?"
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:17 PM
5

I think that might just be an annoying deterrent to fair minded people.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:14 PM
1

Singing about something and supporting it are two different things. Anyone who thinks the things Cannibal Corpse sings about are meant to be taken seriously, is delusional. It's more GWAR-esq, tongue in cheek satire than serious subject matter. They fully admit there's nothing serious about their songs.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:55 PM
1

That's interesting. I wonder what the underlying cause is. I also had to laugh at this: "During the month prior to the survey, men claimed to have sex an average of 5.2 times and women 5.6 times."
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:06 PM
-2

Standing for something while doing nothing about lies, half-truths, and unfounded beliefs; especially when they're as pervasive as the feminist narrative, serves no purpose but to let yourself get drowned in the tyranny of the majority.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:03 PM
5

Gotta love Ms./Mrs. Sommers. She is unparalleled in the realm of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:44 PM
1

Nothing wrong with a joke or two. Let's not follow suit with the "feminist library." You know how you're in a feminist library? There's no humor section. What would be something to get upset about would be 1000 comments of "OMG your right so tru"
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:57 PM
3

That it is, but the one thing common among all people who overcome the difficulty of change is perseverance. So hang in there. All is not lost. We're just getting started.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:46 PM
35

Doesn't sound like it. Sounds like you did exactly what you wanted to, it just wasn't an entirely pleasant experience afterward.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:40 PM
3

You may always have to deal with it. If the ribs and lifting night show anything, it's that there can never be any events without 1000 jerkoffs trying to tear it down because it doesn't fit their insecure, bullshit view of society.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:37 PM
1

As I said before, those things simply make someone a more likely target. The only thing it assumes is that rape is not 100% power focused (that there is a sexual element to it as well). That given the choice between raping someone dressed provocatively, who has been drinking, and has no inhibitions; rather than the alternative, they'll take the former. It's the path of least resistance. A simple fact of the criminal world.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:34 PM
2

I will take one step in the right direction over one step backwards any day.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:23 PM
5

Scapegoating. When you encourage people, usually women in the western world, to blame everyone else for their problems, this is the natural consequence. Both sexes are masters of their own destiny, but it works to perpetuate the feminist narrative if people believe women are just along for the ride.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:11 PM
1

When men stop paying the increased price.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:06 PM
6

Not enough information to go on, but the fake caller ID programs have been around forever and are incredibly easy to get and use, so it's certainly not out of the question.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:12 PM
3

That would be true if it's what anyone meant when they said to take proactive measures to avoid being a victim. Fortunately, it's no where close. What those things presume are that a rapist is a rapist. Not a man's natural state is a rapist.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:42 PM
2

The sidebar is where you want to look. You'll have more than enough information to walk in Wednesday and be able to state your case if you read even half of it.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:00 PM
9

Glad to hear it! Hopefully everything continues to go well. As well as can be expected anyway.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:57 PM
2

Ditto. I'm not sure if employers know what "entry level" means anymore. Good luck with your search.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:53 PM
6

Priority? No. Beneficial? Yes. Also, sure they didn't "lower standards," they just started looking for lower positions because women weren't meeting the senior level qualifications. After they got the experience under their belt, they could then come into a more standard position. Like back in the day when employers trained employees instead of simply demanding everyone know everything before they're hired. However, it's really the same thing as lowering standards. It's just creating lower level…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:17 PM
7

"By not including how rape affects men and boys, we construct schema and frameworks that do not fit reality." That is the very thing wrong with feminism as a whole, not just the examination of "rape culture."
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:43 PM
5

I would be interested in how quick the entire nation would condemn this if they were female but, since we'd never even consider punishing a female this way, we'll never know.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:34 PM
5

That's my fault. I should have added the "parents of school age children" qualifier. Small children that don't nap regularly are like those little plastic balls with a motor in them and the raccoon tail attached to it. Then trying to catch it while drunk, blindfolded, and inside one of those American Gladiators cage ball thingys.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:17 PM
1

No, they don't, but other groups and individuals have. I didn't mean to imply they did. For one, the WBC thinks gays should be dead along with anyone that tolerates their existence, let alone supports it. The FRC, although misguided, close-minded, bigots; aren't doing what they do because they hate gays. They do what they do because they're trying to keep marriage "traditional." That certainly excludes gays, but their target isn't gays. It's marriage. Are there supporters of theirs who hate gays…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:14 PM
1

"God hates fags." Protesting funerals. Physical violence. That's hate. Misguided, provably false, bullshit is not hate any more than pushing the wage gap myth under the belief of some magical patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:11 PM
7

Damn. Good for this guy. Still, singles without kids do what he does and work. It's much more difficult than parents make it out to be. Especially when there's two parents.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:45 PM
3

No worries. It's an important day. Fingers crossed.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:32 PM
7

haha. I think you posted to the wrong sub. Neat skull though.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:29 PM
2

Gotcha. The title and link together are a tad confusing.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:28 PM
2

Really old (9/2011), but what a complete load of shit. I wonder how everything turned out.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:13 PM
1

The date listed says it was 3 days ago. What's up with that?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:07 PM
3

The evidence is the hundreds, or thousands, of cases when a man has been charged with the exact same crime and treated completely different. It's more common for women to abuse children in their care, but look at any situation when a man molests a girl and the legal outcome. Even a man that is not placed in a position of power is railroaded (if he's guilty, rightfully so), but her punishment? Less than a year in prison, no registering as a sex offender, and 3 years probation (after which, she ca…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:36 PM
8

Why the hell aren't these pedophiles having to register as a sex offender? I mean, I know the answer, but it's astounding the blatant double standards here.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:31 PM
2

I have always thought homosexual couples should have the right to marry and I still think the FRC should not be labled a hate group. They have an opinion they stand by, as do I, but hate? A hate group is the Westboro Baptist Church. A group advocating against same sex marriage is not hate, as much as I disagree with them. Seems like we need to sit some of the social justice narcissists down and explain what hate is, considering they perpetrate a large portion of it.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:28 PM
2

They're not all bad. Some are just poorly educated in actual sexism. Some are perfectly egalitarian but tend to buy into the media regarding how "bad" women have it and they focus almost exclusively on that. Some are sorry excuses for people and have been guilt tripped and duped into thinking their own sex is oppressive. Some really are just bigot feminazis. You have to take individuals at the individual level, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't take issue with feminism on a larger scale. It's …
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:59 PM
2

I actually use Norton (not by choice - work computer), with it's default settings, and it's not blocking the site at all.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:48 PM
1

This was definitely during their period of poor quality. Right up there with Luke McKinney's article about sexism in comics. Lately, I think the editors realized the dip in quality and got their shit together. For a while, it didn't even seem like they were doing their job at all and just let any bullshit through.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:33 PM
130

Since MRAs support logical thought and facts, if you oppose MRAs, you must be a moron. Sad that it's often so true.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:31 PM
9

Crap. This is a list of decent things to do to anyone, mixed with attempted male guilt-tripping, dressed up in an attempt to get the reader laid. None of these turn anyone one who doesn't have a very unique fetish.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:05 PM
2

That would be very interesting as well. A hard look at this legal debtor's prison is long overdue.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:42 PM
3

Really love her stuff.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:41 PM
3

It would be interesting to see if there is a link between the two, but no one has so I can't really form an opinion on it. I would be interested in the results though.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:31 PM
1

"The author probably did what many authors do and wrote it from their own perspective (a woman) instead of a neutral one."
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:29 PM
2

Assholes writing about other assholes. Why bother?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:37 PM
3

I don't think this is a big deal either. If they had mentioned fathers instead, would you be thinking they were going out of their way to exclude mothers? Probably not. The author probably did what many authors do and wrote it from their own perspective (a woman) instead of a neutral one.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:04 PM
30

Man, I know this isn't said enough, but I really enjoy and appreciate your work.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:44 PM
26

She uses the word "oppress" to describe what men do to women. You can be sure it has no roots in legitimacy.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:32 PM
6

It's a matter of perspective. "Playing the victim" could also be seen as "highlighting sexism most people assume can't happen." As long as they don't make up the bulk of what goes on here daily, and they don't, I don't see a problem with someone looking for advice/input, or just venting a little frustration with what may be the only community that will allow them to vent said frustration. The rest of the world isn't exactly sympathetic to a man airing grievances. Less so if they're rooted in his…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:00 PM
15

Calling a bitch a "bitch" is perfectly justifiable.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:40 PM
2

You should make it. It wouldn't be too hard to find someone to volunteer to make the site (especially here), assuming you couldn't, if you paid for the domain.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:30 PM
3

Everyone should post this to Twitter with the #1ReasonWhy hashtag.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:03 PM
5

That isn't entirely true, but I've seen less votes on disagreements here than almost anywhere else. /r/games aside.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:33 PM
5

True, but it would be good for them to have it on file so they could be mindful of it when/if it happens again.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:32 PM
13

Hopefully, someone on that campus finds this post and reports it to the police.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:51 PM
2

You'll probably have to cut and paste. The link just takes you to the outlook page.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:11 PM
2

You are correct, this is not victim blaming. It's simply stating what should be obvious. Self-preservation in an imperfect world. Things can make you a more or less obvious target, but it's usually not your fault when/if something happens to you.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:02 PM
10

Dr. T has her PhD in Clinical Psychology and approaches it from a, relatively, gender neutral stance. Check her out. I'm sure she'd love to speak with you. www.shrink4men.com
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:48 PM
3

It's being held for 60 days to see if racism was a factor in her guilty verdict. If no evidence in support of this theory is found, they will move forward on the execution.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:11 PM
6

I've never heard this before, but I'll keep an eye out for it now. I love the people at Snopes. Thanks for the heads up!
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:05 PM
3

You probably shouldn't link the download directly. No one with any experience on the internet will read this otherwise. Try linking to the page with the download on it. That way, everyone can view the page first to see if it's legit.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:28 PM
4

Did not know men could not change their name as a result of marriage. At least in Florida. I wonder if it's different elsewhere.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:22 PM
1

That's pretty old and has already been debunked countless times. Sad that it's still making the rounds.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:48 PM
11

By men that are forced to think a certain way for men that are forced to think a certain way. Also, you are unqualified to say what women generally find attractive. You're not the general female public. I have a friend who is bodybuilder and women swarm on him like flies on shit any time he goes anywhere in public simply due to his physique. Most are open about it too so there's no confusion what they want. First, men don't have the purchasing power in western society. That statement is provably…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:37 PM
20

First, assuming this "male fantasy" nonsense to be true, the "male fantasy" would only be their fantasy because of the sexism men face to actually conform to that stereotype. Which, is hardly the work of men exclusively. Second, the female character appearance comes from the female fantasy. They cake on make up, starve themselves, stuff themselves into outfits that don't fit, trying to emulate impossible goals of beauty. That's in real life. Not the games. The characters are reflections of that.…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:02 PM
2

Interesting, although a poor example. It sounds like the husband was just feeding her insecurity about her weight. However, it also sounds like she was too lazy to get her ass in gear to fix her own insecurity until somewhat recently.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:17 PM
2

Feminist smoke and mirrors. If they weren't such capable magicians, we may have accomplished gender equality by now.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:35 PM
5

There is 8 things wrong with sending you that while talking about "male privilege." F-E-M-I-N-I-S-M. You can never actually discuss the concept of male privilege within feminism because it's assumed to be 100% true and the cause of much wrong in society. It's like discussing equal rights using Nazi standards. However, that's the funny thing about privilege. By a neutral definition, it defines women's stance in society. In practice and by law. There exists no such thing for men. It's only assumed…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:20 PM
1

There's always been some desire to see women on the battlefield from feminists, but it's always been with a ho-hum enthusiasm and little motivation or action. I'm 100% sure they'll be protesting the Selective Service requirements that come with it though.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:10 PM
1

I'm all for it. There is no reason for them not to be allowed to be front line infantry unless we begin to acknowledge differences or faults that should also limit other capabilities.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:28 PM
11

I hope you reported her so they could take her profile down.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:26 PM
8

Glad everything worked out. Not glad the majority of people think this never happens.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:12 PM
3

I hope all goes well for you.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:18 PM
1

Ah, yes. I believe the term is maanpuolustusvelvollisuus.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:09 PM
5

Right on track to Fahrenheit 451.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:33 PM
1

I predict the question will get downvoted to hell and will be ignored.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:27 PM
21

One step forward, already considering steps back. "Ministers are also considering giving property rights to unmarried couples who have lived together for a certain period of time."
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:29 PM
47

Goddamn. That takes some serious balance and strength.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:24 PM
5

You do know America doesn't have a draft, right? The Selective Service registration is just a fail safe for if they ever have to instate a draft again, in the event of a catastrophic war.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:21 PM
8

I'll believe it when I see the first woman, who doesn't register, being denied any type of federal aid.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:11 PM
1

A "draft" is when the government gives you two choices: join the military or go to prison.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:51 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:46 PM
1

Ah, the old eye for an eye. I see the relevancy, but not sure I agree with it. However, I do think if abortion were tied to paternal surrender, then women would line up en mass to support it.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:20 PM
1

Can we start enforcing a policy of explaining the relevancy of things like this (if they're relevant to MR at all)? After reading it, I'm not sure why this is in /MR.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:29 PM
2

I've been here for a year or more and I've never seen any racism save once or twice. I'd be surprised to find out it's actually as rampant as the article says. Or maybe reddit just self-polices better than other sites.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:25 PM
1

With the intent to have sex? It would not be rape. Without the intent to have sex? It would be rape. In practice, both would be prosecuted as rape as long as no one came forward with the knowledge of the intent mentioned in the first scenario.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 02:42 PM
2

Helps. With society at large beginning to take notice to feminism's hypocrisy, being the opposition to that is actually helpful.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 02:22 PM
21

And this is why I don't donate to Wikipedia when they beg for money every year. The lack of integrity is laughable.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 02:11 PM
2

Considering the demand for males to be more competent than females and the excessive backlash for mistakes (compared to females), it's not entirely surprising. However, how is it relevant to men's rights?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:43 PM
1

Boyfriends have always been the primary victims of rape. /s (as a side note, this is a jab at Hillary Clinton's comment "women have always been the primary victims of war" because their husbands die.)
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:49 PM
1

Delete and post the original article. No Gawker media sites on /MR.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:15 PM
1

Couldn't even read this nonsense. Neither of them should be allowed to breed.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:11 PM
2

There's room for every man in the MRM. Gay, straight, trans, any gender, any orientation, any sex. Welcome!
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:53 PM
7

We are inclusive of gay and trans individuals. We face the issues they face as men. The issues they face being anything but cis and straight is not a men's rights issue. It's unfortunate they have to face those issues but we can't adopt every good cause that comes along because it's a good cause.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:01 PM
3

If you thought we'd like it, then you know nothing about /MR. I'd put money on most of the upvotes coming from someone reading the title alone and thinking this was some legit pedo pervert who finally got her comeuppance.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:32 PM
8

Did women ever have it worse? That's debatable. 1) It's all subjective. A caged bird has it better than the canary in the mine. 2) Saying one is "worse" devalues another person's life and experiences. 3) It's a slippery slope. If we assume that women had it worse, as a silencing technique against men, what's to stop us from telling white women to quit bitching because they have it better than blacks. Or anyone who is straight to stop complaining because they're not gay. Or lesbians to quiet down…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:55 PM
0

It's only bad when a man is doing it. It was perfectly fine for women to do it, and it was expected. However, there really isn't a counterargument. Men being looked down on for doing "women's work" has always been an issue for men. What was considered a woman's work was cleaner, safer, less strenuous, etc. The fact that men weren't allowed to do those things without ridicule should be a perfect example of how men were forced into gender roles just as often as women. It's not because it was work …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:28 PM
1

They're looked down on by doing "women's work," but it's only considered that because it's not a "man's work" he's doing. One unfair stereotype doesn't exist without the other.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:44 PM
-1

Relevancy?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:42 PM
-1

Funny, but not MR related and certainly gives off the wrong vibe. Maybe better off in /r/mrmemes.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:50 PM
5

To be fair, that article is from '91. I wonder if anyone has tried it recently.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:43 PM
3

Abortion is not (should not be, anyway) a female issue. It's an issue of recognizing a right to life, when that starts, what constitutes killing a human, and when is it acceptable. Second to that, it can be a female issue of bodily autonomy, but not primarily.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:49 PM
4

I wish she would get sick like E.T.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:41 PM
1

Legally, they have to if they meet the FMLA requirements. There's really no "depends" about it. If they're not required to offer it to men, they're also not required to offer it to women.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:37 PM
1

Oddly enough, in the US, men are given the same parental leave as women. They just don't often take it since having no income is really difficult or their employer doesn't meet the FMLA requirements to be required to offer leave.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:30 PM
2

It's called "egalitarian." You don't buy into the usual feminist bullshit but still support women's right to be a fully realized and independent individual. Which you can't really do and be a feminist, actually.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:23 PM
0

Honestly, were you surprised? It's not a class based no discussion or facts. It's a hardline, fanatical, draconian, religion.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:00 PM
8

This was amazing.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:20 PM
0

Well, at least they're starting to be honest.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:37 PM
2

Oh damn. I didn't actually count them. I just assumed it was 100 since that would have made sense. Good call. I wouldn't have caught that.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:34 PM
2

I wouldn't consider it the best estimate ("best" is a pretty relative term and the FBI estimates false reports at 8%), but it does highlight the fact that false rape claims are more common than widely believed (which is funny because this graph asserts that the majority of the population thinks every rape claim is false. Which, itself, is false.) There really is no difference. They just differentiate between to two to make the graph support the untrue notion that 2% of rape reports are false.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:22 PM
2

Technically, that 40% or so was from a small town sample. It's doesn't represent the whole picture, but you're right. It's more than 2%. The FBI even estimates it at 8%. Basically, the graph does all it can to 1) manufacture more rape hysteria 2) make a baseless claim that the general population thinks false rape allegations are so rampant that it stifles rape reporting, conviction, etc. It's the same old feminist BS we've been hearing for years but no one no intelligent person is buying.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:47 PM
4

Oh, nice! Carry on then. Unfortunately, I don't have a link for you.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:22 PM
4

I can't imagine why you'd want a 2-4 minute speech other than to just read it verbatim and try to pass it off as your own. Why not read some of his books, website articles, etc. and write your own speech? I'm sure that's what your instructor has in mind.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:14 PM
1

The friends I have that pay child support pay for daycare costs in their child support payments. So, don't pay for it twice if it's included.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:37 PM
22

Aren't most things only a problem when they happen to women? At least, it often seems that way.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:01 PM
6

We do need some standard. To be sure we're not giving out bad advice. According to US federal law, only one person need be aware of the recording. However, each state also has their own laws. There are 12 states that require all parties being recorded be aware and give consent (this is anywhere, even a private residence). They are: California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. Hawaii requires both parties give co…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:14 PM
2

To be fair, the description does say he was trying to smack her around. However, I doubt we'd be as accepting of a man dragging a woman out into the street and making an example out of her.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:32 PM
23

Can we stop telling people to secretly record conversations? Since we have no idea where this guy is from, we should assume it's illegal (as it is in several states).
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:23 PM
151

Let them throw their tantrums. It makes for fantastic MRM advertisement.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:36 PM
9

You can't link to Gawker media sites. Imgur is not a Gawker site.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:35 PM
1

It may have been staged considering they were making this little film thingy. He does laugh, after all. Although, that may just have been due to being embarrassed.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:14 PM
51

This was the funniest article I've read in a long time. .....oh wait. She was serious? Hopefully, she's writing it from an asylum.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:09 PM
2

From the mod policy: "No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites."
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:00 PM
25

Most likely because of the tons of resources we use to give them shelter (even preferentially) and that there are many people willing to take them in because they're viewed as helpless and victims instead of a loser, drug addict, or unstable. Like we view homeless men.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:49 PM
-2

No, there's no truth in it. You're just an asshole like the Westboro Baptist Church, the Ku Klux Klan, or Nazis. The question is "what do you plan to do about it?" You can continue to live under the ridiculous delusion that half of the population is a poorly developed characture of sexism, violence, and oppression; or you can educate yourself and realize that broad generalizations based on a very small part of the population are an asinine way to form opinions.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:05 PM
21

Dear god that was neutral (as it should be in his position). Well written.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:41 PM
2

Too vague and one sided to accurately tell. Given the reactions everyone supposedly had, it sounds like she got drunk and cheated on her boyfriend then tried to use her drunkenness as an excuse why it "wasn't her fault" and how he took advantage of her, but no one bought her bullshit. If that wasn't the case, then it was a fucked up situation and hardly an accurate representation of society.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:45 PM
3

This was brilliant.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:38 PM
2

Stop replying to her.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:09 PM
3

I'm on the fence about it. I can see how it can be taken as a slight against men, and it may well be. We generally don't care about men's health in most countries. However, it does also ignore every other sort of cancer that both men and women get. I do take issue with the breast cancer industry though because it is in an industry. The CEO of Komen makes over $500,000 a year. You can market tits and rake in a buttload of cash. I'm just not sure why the government also dumps millions into breast …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:13 PM
4

The issue is that breast cancer is (mostly) sex selective. As is testicular and prostate cancer. On average, there are as many or more deaths from prostate cancer as there are from breast cancer, yet the funding is painfully skewed. That's usually the issue.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:33 PM
5

I read this today and thought it was a really fantastic read: http://orwellwasright.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/feminism-in-the-21st-century/ Some of the issues raised there are a good place to start.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:23 PM
5

It's Luke McKinney. Cracked.com's resident assclown. You can pretty much ignore any article he writes because it's just going to be butthurt over some incredibly minor inconvenience to female geeks.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:11 PM
10

It also states the penetration is limited to vagina, anus, or mouth. edit: the UCR official definition is “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:00 PM
26

Rape of men is legal in all states, as far as I know, so long as the rapist doesn't penetrate him. The legal definition of rape doesn't dictate sex but does explicitly state that the victim must be penetrated.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:48 PM
4

Ahhh generalizing half the population. You've completely missed the point of /mensrights.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:12 PM
74

Loved this response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZueOCLGt1tw
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:41 PM
0

They can't handle anything that isn't a circle jerk. It's either "parrot what we say" or banhammer.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:22 PM
2

Make sure you take screen shots or post the text from Jezebel and all Gawker Media sites. Linking directly to them is against the mod policy.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:42 PM
2

I actually think that's a fair difference.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:29 PM
2

No memes or rage comics. (Mod Policy on the right) You may just want to make a self-post describing the situation instead of a meme.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:24 PM
-1

S'ok. Just take a few screenshots and upload them in imgur, or your site of preference, and link to those. Alternatively, you can just copy and paste the text to a self-post.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:58 PM
4

Do not link to Jezebel or any Gawker sites here. Post screenshots, if you must.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:44 PM
17

I'm mixed on the doxing too. I understand it's purpose. To fight fire with fire, using the same BS tactics some people use to silence human rights activists, but to stoop to the same low? I firmly believe you can see someone's character by how they treat their enemies, but I also believe in teaching someone a lesson about their treatment of others. So, I'm torn. Maybe doxing a few of these people would be a good idea. It may be the wake up slap in the face some of these people need. Maybe it wou…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:41 PM
10

They mention the updated definition of rape which, unfortunately, is still completely contingent on penetration and not being forced to penetrate. Meaning female rapists are few and far between, technically.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:49 PM
2

In the event that you come back, you can register online. You don't need to do it the day you turn 18 or anything. I did mine a few months later. https://www.sss.gov/
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:29 PM
0

I find death to be much worse than rape. In modern western society, we regard rape as something worse than death that a person never recovers from. Some special interest groups need this to be true to further their agendas, but I can say without a doubt that the human spirit can over come anything if they want to. It's when you convince them that they can't, that they accept weakness. I would rather be recovering than dead.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter