TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Powerful_Art_1906 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by Powerful_Art_1906 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

It’s just bad advice. It involves spending some money and a lot of time for little gain. There are very few women at bars, they’re usually with men, they won’t be interested anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 09:35 PM
–

My point is that until artificial wombs are very cheap, that sort of thing will not be as prevalent as the natural fertility of other groups. Some will get surrogacy, but overall, they will die out, and then the demand for “post scarcity” will, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 10:27 PM
–

Surrogacy costs at least 50K, so that’s like several years up front. Not going to compete with poor people popping out babies for free/by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:16 PM
1

The women who self-report seeking “commitment” are still either looking for a small subset of men or are after money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:29 PM
–

Unless those things allow men to have their own (genetic) children, they won’t cause post scarcity. They’ll just cause a subset of men to die out faster, to be replaced with theocracy/idiocracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:24 PM
6

Men (well, the smarter, harder working men) provide innovation and tax dollars, but this happens whether or not women want them. When it comes to relationships, women are very demanding and don’t want men as much. Some women will take money, but that isn’t women needing men, it’s women wanting their money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:20 PM
9

Men aren’t “highly sought after” ever, women just lose some of their advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:13 PM
1

Feminists could tell smart women to have babies rather than careers, but they won’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:55 PM
1

Morons and criminals have more children than normal. Society won’t put meaningful effort toward preventing worthless men from reproducing, let alone getting women to choose important traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:23 AM
1

“Society” doesn’t care about old men either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:24 AM
0

At a certain age, they end up as valuable as their male equivalents.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:09 AM
7

Not really, a eugenics handbook would consider psychosis bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:49 AM
9

Who has had more kids and prettier wives?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:42 AM
4

I think you get your view of France from romance novels.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 12:50 AM
1

If you pay people to make bad choices, you incentivize them, and they are made more often. Government acting as a husband makes women more okay with choosing unsuitable men, since even if things work out, they’ll have assured support. There are also long term genetic consequences of subsidizing the unsuitable, though I don’t think this sub is ready for that conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:04 AM
1

Have you ever told women to value or respect their measurable equals?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:21 AM
1

AAs have more sex and children on average than whites. The issue isn’t that black women aren’t getting it. Black men “disappear” at very high rates, but that happens with white women, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 12:53 AM
2

She was complaining about preferences for light skin. I’m just pointing out that it isn’t usually important. Race is, but it’s important for men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 12:05 AM
2

People who aren’t suitable to be parents should not have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:53 PM
7

Most men aren’t going to reject someone of their preferred race if they have a slight tan.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 07:35 PM
7

If they are ethnically similar (women prefer this as well), then no, men won’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:53 PM
0

If the woman is gifted and healthy, and the parents take care of their 13 children, then they have done nothing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:00 AM
1

It depends on who is reproducing. If they are smart, stable and hardworking, they will not be very criminal or abusive. Illegalizing abortions just leads to impulsive simpletons reproducing more. Although forcing reproduction is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:52 AM
8

If the $12/hr guy is taller, has better facial features or has more dark triad traits, then yes. Now, that won’t stop many women from letting the software engineer spend money on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 06:34 PM
–

Women are picky for physical attraction. Poor people having more children has little to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 05:39 PM
1

“Putting a slice of cheese into your mouth is okay for a lactose intolerant person as long as they don’t swallow.”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:02 PM
-1

Or maybe let men be providers and women be mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:24 PM
1

Tate-style arguments in favor of polygamy and infidelity are usually terrible. If men leave their women because they’re “bored” with them, they are 100% at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 06:30 PM
5

Those men leave women. Then decent, kind men get to raise and fund their babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 05:05 PM
4

Most of this is socialist entitlement and pension to old people. It will just raise taxes even higher and force people to fund the elderly even more. It’s not going to raise fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:50 PM
2

That’s feminism’s goal. They haven’t been very successful. Hopefully, it will become discredited enough that no further meddling will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:51 AM
2

Wait, you seriously think that the pervasive myths of women earning 80/75/90 cents on the dollar (or at least the idea that this was sexism and not different carer choices/numbers of hours worked) did not come from feminists? Feminists want to even the pay gap, but the pay gap is gender differences, not sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:13 AM
3

Feminists advocate for better pay for men, they want better pay for women. It’s not everyone getting paid more, it’s women. Right now, both women and men are paid what they should be paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:32 PM
–

Then they make relatively less than you. Of course, if you got a raise, then you probably earned it, but feminists falsely claim that women are significantly underpaid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:21 PM
5

It’s not a perfect meritocracy, no. Due to affirmative action, some groups get preferential treatment in hiring. But it is very close, at least for men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:19 PM
–

Gender-wages is zero sum. Feminists advocate for more pay for women, but not for men (save for maybe some “feminists” who are actually just socialists”.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:12 PM
–

No. Women want higher salaries and better jobs than they can get metitocratically, therefore giving them those things without doing the same for men is anti-male.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:11 PM
–

Feminists advocate for better pay and jobs for women, which means comparatively less for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:32 PM
–

If there are (basically) 2 genders, then pro one is anti the other. More money, jobs and social privileges to one means comparatively less of those to the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:31 PM
3

Feminism will be corrected when religious people who don’t care about feminism are most of the population in about 90 years. Then, the genetics that produced feminism will have largely disappeared, and the culture will follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:23 AM
2

The “normal way” was dumb, lazy, disabled, severely antisocial and unhealthy people dying young or otherwise ending up sterilized. The men who didn’t breed were killed in constant wars with neighbors, or died out in famines because they were not prioritized over women. The idea that human evolution was the “logical” selection of who should breed by society as a whole is nonsense probably conceived by a sociologist. Wanting to raise other people’s kids is simply not hardwired into humans on a lar…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:20 AM
4

They don’t care because men’s standards are lower than women’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:40 PM
1

They won’t get high paying jobs, as they’ll spend all day reading the Bible/Quaran/Torah rather than gaining advanced skills. They’ll still have lots of babies, who will eventually vote against anything other than extreme patriarchy and theocracy, as the culture and genes of more liberal populations dies out. Feminism disappearing will be a good thing, but the loss of secular values and science may be a long-term curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 10:13 PM
1

Look at the nations with high fertility vs. low fertility. The high fertility populations are poor and fanatically religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 08:52 PM
1

Men would love to, but women need to in order to have children, and they usually need a provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:30 PM
-4

Men glorified it because it produced people for families and nations. Men didn’t promote femininity among men because it served no purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:29 PM
0

Productive, low-crime populations are being reduced. Others are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:24 PM
-1

SK’s feminism is more problematic than the west’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:23 PM
4

Secular Jews have around 2 kids. Lower than orthos, but still around replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter